Monsoon news: ‘All monsoons are caused by temperature differences between the land and the sea’ — Peter Shelton

precipforecastjuly25to31.jpg

From The Watch (Peter Shelton):

The North American monsoon arrives every summer about this time, and blessedly so, following a baking-hot June with its smoke and fires and nervous fireworks bans.

The term monsoon comes, of course, from the famous Indian monsoon weather pattern that drenches much of the Asian subcontinent like clockwork every (well almost every) year. The root is an Arabic word, mausim, which means “wind-shift.” Sailors on the Arabian Sea noticed centuries ago that dry northeast winds in the winter suddenly turned southwest during the summer, bringing with them torrential rains. A similar wind-shift drives our mid-summer pattern.

All monsoons are caused by temperature differences between the land and the sea. The Indian summer heats the vast Rajasthan Desert. Ours is similarly driven by the hot, dry Sonoran/Mojave complex, stretching from western Mexico to eastern California. As the deserts heat up in June and July, surface low-pressure forms over Arizona triggering the wind-shift and sucking moisture up from the south. You can see it on the satellite pictures: moisture pumping northward from the Gulf of California.

The pattern starts along Mexico’s tropical Pacific coast and builds gradually to the north. When the plume bumps up against the high country, daytime convection builds those towering cumulus clouds, and the rainy season begins. In Asia, the barrier is the great Himalayan Range. In Arizona, the Mogollon Rim serves the same lifting/cooling function. When the moisture finally reaches Colorado (near the northern limit of most monsoons) the southern mountains especially present an impressive rain-generating barrier.

Parts of Mexico and Arizona receive 80 percent of their annual rainfall in July and August. Nearly a quarter of Telluride’s yearly total falls courtesy of the monsoon. As important perhaps as the wetting of the soil is the cooling of the psyche, the relief felt by flowers and wild things and the humans who tramp among them…

The worst days were the result of mesoscale convective complexes (MCCs). These super-size groupings of cells organize into monster storms capable of dropping furious amounts of water. These are the cells that cover Hwy 145 in red mud, that wash thousands of tires into the Uncompahgre River.

This is what happened on July 31, 1999, in the Dallas Creek drainage west of Ridgway.

An MCC got stuck between the Uncompahgre Plateau and the Sneffels Range and dropped about three inches of rain in three hours. Little Dallas Creek, which was flowing at a lazy 130 cubic feet per second the day before, leapt up to 3,960 cfs on the 31st – almost eight feet above flood stage. The flood took out bridges and hayfields and rural roads for miles around.

From the National Weather Service Pueblo office:

MONSOON RAINS BRING SOME RELIEF IN THE DROUGHT FOR PORTIONS OF SOUTHERN COLORADO…

SYNOPSIS…UPDATED

THE ONSET OF THE SOUTHWEST MONSOON HAS BROUGHT SOME MUCH NEEDED AND BENEFICIAL RAIN TO PORTIONS OF SOUTH CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST COLORADO…WITH WIDESPREAD PRECIPITATION TOTALS BETWEEN 3 AND 4 INCHES RECORDED ACROSS THE SOUTHEAST MOUNTAINS SINCE THE BEGINNING OF JULY. THIS MOISTURE…HOWEVER…HAS NOT BEEN AS MUCH OR WIDESPREAD ENOUGH ACROSS THE REST OF SOUTH CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST COLORADO TO BRING ANY LONG TERM RELIEF TO THE DROUGHT GRIPPING THE REGION OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.

WITH THIS IN MIND…THE CURRENT US DROUGHT MONITOR INDICATES IMPROVEMENT IN THE DROUGHT ACROSS THE SOUTHEAST MOUNTAINS AND NOW DEPICTS SEVERE DROUGHT (D2) CONDITIONS IN PLACE ACROSS MOST OF CUSTER COUNTY…EXTREME SOUTHWESTERN PUEBLO COUNTY….WESTERN AND CENTRAL PORTIONS OF HUERFANO COUNTY AND EXTREME WESTERN LAS ANIMAS COUNTY.

EXCEPTIONAL (D4) DROUGHT CONDITIONS REMAIN DEPICTED ACROSS MOST OF THE SOUTHEAST COLORADO PLAINS AND INCLUDES SOUTH CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST PORTIONS OF EL PASO COUNTY…CENTRAL AND EASTERN PORTIONS OF PUEBLO COUNTY…CENTRAL AND EASTERN PORTIONS OF LAS ANIMAS COUNTY…AS WELL AS ALL OF CROWLEY…OTERO…KIOWA…BENT…PROWERS AND BACA COUNTIES.

EXTREME DROUGHT (D3) CONDITIONS CONTINUE TO BE INDICATED ACROSS EXTREME NORTHEASTERN CUSTER COUNTY…EASTERN HUERFANO COUNTY AND WEST CENTRAL PORTIONS OF LAS ANIMAS COUNTY. EXTREME DROUGHT (D3) CONDITIONS REMAIN DEPICTED ACROSS MOST OF FREMONT COUNTY…MUCH OF TELLER COUNTY…MOST OF THE REST OF EL PASO COUNTY AND THE REST OF PUEBLO COUNTY. EXTREME DROUGHT (D3) CONDITIONS ALSO REMAIN INDICATED ACROSS EXTREME SOUTHWEST MINERAL COUNTY.

SEVERE DROUGHT (D2) CONDITIONS CONTINUE TO BE DEPICTED ACROSS SOUTHERN CHAFFEE COUNTY…EXTREME WESTERN FREMONT COUNTY…NORTHERN TELLER COUNTY AND EXTREME NORTHWESTERN EL PASO COUNTY. SEVERE DROUGHT (D2) CONDITIONS ALSO REMAIN ACROSS THE REST OF MINERAL COUNTY…AS WELL AS ALL OF SAGUACHE…RIO GRANDE…CONEJOS…ALAMOSA AND COSTILLA COUNTIES.

MODERATE DROUGHT (D1) CONDITIONS REMAIN DEPICTED ACROSS THE REST OF CHAFFEE COUNTY AND LAKE COUNTY.

MORE INFORMATION ON THE US DROUGHT MONITOR CLASSIFICATION SCHEME CAN BE FOUND AT: WWW.DROUGHTMONITOR.UNL.EDU/CLASSIFY.HTM

SUMMARY OF IMPACTS…UPDATED

THE VERY DRY CONDITIONS ACROSS THE STATE CONTRIBUTED TO THE START OF SEVERAL NATURALLY CAUSED AND HUMAN INDUCED WILDFIRES OVER THE PAST FEW MONTHS…INCLUDING THE BLACK FOREST FIRE…WHICH HAS BECOME THE STATES MOST DESTRUCTIVE WILDFIRE ON RECORD…WITH NEARLY 500 HOMES DESTROYED.

WITH THE ONSET OF THE SUMMER MONSOON…AREAS IN AND AROUND THESE NEWLY CREATED AND OTHER RECENT BURN SCARS ACROSS SOUTH CENTRAL AND SOUTHEAST COLORADO…HAVE ALSO EXPERIENCED DESTRUCTIVE FLASH FLOODING DUE TO THE LOSS OF VEGETATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT O HYDROPHOBIC SOILS CAUSED BY THE FIRES.

HOWEVER…THE BENEFICIAL MONSOONAL RAINS HAS PROVIDED SOME SHORT TERM RELIEF TO THE AREA…WITH SEVERAL LARGE MUNICIPAL WATER PROVIDERS EASING OR HAVING PLANS TO EASE THE STRICT WATER RESTRICTIONS IMPLEMENTED THIS PAST SPRING…INCLUDING DENVER WATER AND COLORADO SPRINGS UTILITIES.

THE STATE HAS SETUP THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE TO GIVE INDIVIDUALS INFORMATION ON WHAT THE CURRENT WATER RESTRICTIONS IN THEIR SPECIFIC COMMUNITY ARE: WWW.COH2O.CO

Drought news: Colorado Springs Utilities backs off tough water restrictions #COdrought

usdroughtmonitorcolorado07092013.jpg

usdroughtmonitor07092013.jpg

From The Colorado Springs Gazette (Monica Mendoza):

In a reversal from its “hold the line” stance earlier this month, Colorado Springs Utilities water experts now say the city has enough water in its reserves to relax the lawn watering restrictions and recommended going from two days a week to three days a week. They also recommended changing the amount of water each household can use per month, from 2,000 cubic feet to 2,500 cubic feet, before higher rates apply. And, they are asking to lower the penalty rate by almost half. The proposed changes were presented to the Utilities board on Wednesday. “The reason for that is a really late snow pack,” said Gary Bostrom, utilities chief water services officer. “It had accumulated and built, even well into June.”

The city tried to save water and hoped that lawn watering restrictions, coupled with penalties, would keep more water in the reservoirs. The program sailed through April and May, when spring rain showers kept people from turning on sprinklers. But in June, about 22 percent of Colorado Springs residents opened their water bills and found they had crested the threshold that triggers higher water rates. Outraged about their high water bills, residents bombarded City Council with hundreds of angry calls and emails.

Bostrom said that is not why Utilities is recommending the changes mid-summer. The city now has 1.8 years of water in storage and he feels comfortable with that, he said. “Looking at the end of June and looking at our reservoirs level and how they had responded, we went up 5,000 acre feet in one week, we didn’t expect to see that level of increase,” Bostrom said. “We are in a much better place.”

City Council is expected to vote on the issue July 23. If approved, the changes would go into affect Aug. 1…

As of early July, the city was out of runoff from this past winter’s snow pack. The city’s reservoirs are about 57 percent full. From 1970 to 2011, those reservoirs were 74 percent full. “We are in a good place to get through 2013, and our focus now is to get through 2014,” Bostrom said. “The big unknown is snow pack and where will we land in snow pack?”

From The Pueblo Chieftain (Chris Woodka):

Pueblo’s water storage has rebounded in the past two months, nearly back to the point where it was a year ago. Overall water use has dropped, despite the hot, dry weather that continued until a downpour earlier this week.

As of Monday, the Pueblo Board of Water Works had stored 38,550 acre-feet of water, more than a year’s supply for treated water, in four reservoirs. That compares with more than 42,000 acre-feet at the same time last year. “So, we’re within 5,000 acre-feet of last year?” water board President Mike Cafasso asked Water Resources Manager Alan Ward during a presentation at Tuesday’s monthly meeting.

“Yes,” Ward responded.

After the meeting, Ward said it was unlikely any more water would be stored and supplies could begin to be drawn down. That depends on weather.

Last year, there was little rainfall between June and November, and Pueblo’s storage dropped by 15,000 acre-feet. There was concern earlier this year that it could fall even more as the drought continued, and the water board slashed the outside leases of raw water it typically makes to farmers. No water restrictions inside the board’s service area were applied, however.

Still, water consumption in Pueblo through the first six months of 2013 was 3.28 billion gallons, down 4.7 percent over a five-year average, and less than 2012. That’s significant, because 2013 was even drier than 2012 through June. The major reason is an effort by the city of Pueblo to apply less water to parks and greenways, said Seth Clayton, director of administrative services. Residential use, which spikes in summer for lawn watering, is up.

Revenues should keep pace with this year’s budget because the water to the city is provided at no charge, he added.

Geothermal system at the state capitol is coming online

geothermalopenloop.jpg

From The Denver Post (Howard Pankratz):

The new geothermal heating and cooling system at the Colorado state Capitol, consisting of water pumped from two wells drilled into the Arapahoe Aquifer more than 850 feet underground, is being brought on line this week and should bring hefty savings on utility bills for the Capitol, officials said Wednesday…

The open-loop geothermal system will save an estimated $100,000 in heating and cooling costs in the first year. The savings should escalate each following year by 3 percent…

Gov. John Hickenlooper said the project will make the Colorado Capitol “the first LEED-certified capitol building in the country.” Hickenlooper listed a handful of reasons for the new system. “Several things — one, it (the Capitol) needs it, and there is a high return on the investment and resources,” he said. “Two, it is symbolic. Third, in terms of branding, the next time we are going out for Ardent Mills or another company to move here, it becomes part of that attraction to get people to move here.”

More geothermal coverage here and here.

MCWC: July 19 tour to learn about the water quality and quantity aspects of oil and gas #ColoradoRiver

roandrillingoilgaswesternresourceadvocates.jpg

Here’s the announcement from the Middle Colorado Watershed Council (Click through to register):

You are invited to join the MCWC for its July tour to learn about the water quality and quantity aspects of oil and gas extraction, transmission and production. This will include information on produced water treatment and management in the drilling and completion process.

When: Monday, July 29th, 2013

Time: 9:00 to 11:00 AM

Who: WPX Energy, Inc. will be our tour host and guide for the morning

Where: We will meet in Parachute at a pre-determined location. Additional details will be provided via e-mail to those who RSVP.

More Colorado River Basin coverage here and here.

It turns out the Colorado Springs did need a stormwater enterprise after all, Fountain Creek water quality has declined

ecoli.jpg

From The Pueblo Chieftain (Chris Woodka):

Stormwater flows, sedimentation and E. coli counts on Fountain Creek increased after Colorado Springs eliminated its stormwater enterprise in 2009. That’s not idle speculation, but an analysis provided by Colorado Springs to the Colorado Water Quality Control Division.

Preliminary results of the analysis were given to the Lower Arkansas Valley Water Conservancy District board Wednesday by Peter Nichols, the district’s water attorney. “At the same time, staffing and budgets have decreased, despite what they say their plans are,” Nichols told the board. “Funding has declined and bottomed out in 2012.”

Water quality data from Colorado Springs Utilities required by the state for the city’s stormwater permit from 2008-12 was used in the study by Nichols, a former director of the state water quality agency.

Flows on Fountain Creek increased from an average of 149 cubic feet per second in 2009 to 419 cfs in 2012 at Security, despite drier overall conditions in 2011-12. Similar increases were seen elsewhere in Colorado Springs.

At the same time, E. coli levels and sediment loads increased. Staffing for stormwater by Colorado Springs dropped from 47 in 2007, the first year of the stormwater enterprise to just 9 by 2012. Spending declined from $16.7 million in 2007 to just $1.8 million in 2012.

From the Colorado Springs Independent (Pam Zubeck):

Mayor Steve Bach seems hellbent on forcing Colorado Springs Utilities to fund the city’s stormwater needs, and he’s made yet another maneuver that could harm the city’s $1 billion Southern Delivery System pipeline project from Pueblo Reservoir.

Bach and City Council President Keith King, who is against a tax increase for stormwater, wrote a letter last month to Pueblo County Commission Chairman Sal Pace saying that Utilities had promised years ago to spend $17.6 million annually on stormwater mitigation to secure a construction permit from Pueblo County. Written as a follow-up to a meeting Bach had with Pueblo County officials May 3, it states the city has made “excellent progress” on the stormwater issue.

The city this week confirmed that the letter’s $17.6 million claim is accurate. But according to records and sources, it’s not — which would represent the second time in less than a year that Bach’s administration has used inaccurate statements while trying to foist stormwater funding onto Utilities…

This time around, on June 6, Bach and King sent Pace a letter saying the city submitted a five-year funding and project-priority plan “as part of” the 1041 process. “Colorado Springs and CSU submitted a five year funding and project priority plan for our stormwater capital projects during the review of the 1041 permit,” the letter states. “This plan contemplated spending approximately $88 million over the court of five years, for an average of $17.6 million per year. We have attached a copy of that funding summary for your review.”

But the attached list of Stormwater Enterprise projects is dated January 2010, which is eight months after the 1041 permit was issued. In addition, no such list shows up in the filings made as part of the 1041 process. The permit itself mentions the Stormwater Enterprise, but fails to state dollar figures or outline projects tied to SDS. Instead, the permit says the city “shall maintain stormwater controls and other regulations intended to ensure that Fountain Creek peak flows resulting from new development served by the SDS project within the Fountain Creek basin are no greater than existing conditions.” (Emphasis added.) In other words, as SDS project manager John Fredell says in a statement: “The SDS permit requirements related to stormwater are intended to mitigate the actual impacts of the project, not pre-existing conditions.”[…]

Neither Bach nor King consulted Utilities before writing the June 6 letter, according to Utilities spokeswoman Janet Rummel. King says the mayor’s office asked him to sign it, but he’s now “working with” Utilities officials “about an explanation of that particular letter, to make sure everything is copacetic on this.”

In response to a request for a comment from Bach, Melcher, the city attorney, writes the following via email: “The City confirmed that the June 6, 2013 letter to Pueblo County was accurate, and that early and later drafts of the attachment to that letter (a draft list of proposed Stormwater Projects, totaling $88 million) were communicated to Pueblo County by City and Stormwater Enterprise staff during the 1041 Permit process. The Mayor and City Council will continue to coordinate efforts to address Stormwater, and to communicate those efforts to our neighbors to the south in Pueblo County.”

It’s worth mentioning that Council, not Bach, has authority over Utilities.

Meanwhile Colorado Springs is hosting a public meeting about Fountain Creek Flooding in the wake of the Waldo Canyon Fire. Here’s a report from J. Adrian Stanley writing for the Colorado Springs Independent. Click through for the information for the meeting. Here’s an excerpt:

If you live along Fountain Creek, you’re probably worried about flash flooding. And you should be. The mud, water and debris that came roaring out of Williams Canyon on July 1 and claimed three homes, could have just as well come racing down Fountain Creek. And, in that scenario, who knows how many structures it would have claimed.

Where and when a flash flood happens is a matter of chance — it all depends on which area a storm decides to dump on, how much it rains, and how quickly the rain comes. Thus, the city of Colorado Springs is offering a meeting to help Fountain Creek residents prepare for the worst.

From the Colorado Springs Independent (J. Adrian Stanley):

For months now, the Stormwater Task Force has managed to be two things: (1) a group of interested citizens and government workers striving to fully identify the region’s stormwater problems and identify a funding solution, and (2) an enduring focal point for angst between El Paso County and Colorado Springs Mayor Steve Bach.

At a July 15 meeting of the Task Force, El Paso County Commissioner Amy Lathen said Springs City Attorney Chris Melcher had met with her weeks ago and stated unequivocally that the city would not work with the task force. But at the same meeting, task force member John Cassiani said he’d been talking with the executive department of the city and hoped that a meeting would be possible toward the end of the year.

Lathen said she hoped the meeting would happen, though she doubts it will. “The message that you just gave us is very different than the one we were given just a few weeks ago,” she told Cassiani.

Given that the area has as much as $906 million in stormwater capital needs, plus an estimated $11.5 million in annual stormwater maintenance needs, the ongoing political squabble is no small problem. The mayor believes that the city should solve its stormwater problems independently, and that the scope of the problems is exaggerated. He’s hired Englewood-based firm CH2M HILL to identify the city’s most pressing needs. It could report back as early as October.

Meanwhile, the Stormwater Task Force has been moving forward without the help of the city or its staff. At the July 15 meeting, leaders said they hoped to ask voters to fund a stormwater remedy in the fall 2014 election. What voters would be asked to approve is not yet clear — the task force has not decided whether to pursue a tax, or create a special enterprise that would charge a fee.

More Fountain Creek coverage here and here.