Colorado Invests in Healthy Forests, Rivers, and the Places We Love: Proposition 137 creates new opportunities to strengthen #Colorado’s watersheds, conserve bird habitat, and sustain outdoor recreation for generations to come. — Abby Burk (Audubon.org/Rockies)

Western Tanager (Male), Cabin Lake Viewing Blinds, Deschutes National Forest, Near Fort Rock, Oregon

Click the link to read the article on the Audubon Rockies website (Abby Burk):

November 6, 2026

Colorado’s forests, rivers, and open spaces are more than remarkable landscapes. They are connected natural systems that sustain our water, wildlife, communities, and way of life. The health of one influences the health of another, from snow-covered mountain headwaters to the cottonwood forests lining our rivers.

On November 3, Colorado voters approved Proposition 137, dedicating existing state sales tax revenue from sporting goods to conservation, wildfire risk reduction, watershed health, and outdoor recreation. The measure is expected to direct approximately $175 million annually, beginning in the 2027โ€“28 state budget year, without increasing the state sales tax rate. It will deliver funds through existing state programs supporting land and water conservation, wildfire risk reduction, watershed health, and outdoor recreation.

This is a significant opportunity for Colorado. And now comes the important work of ensuring these investments deliver meaningful, lasting benefits for healthy habitats, birds, wildlife, and people.

Healthy Forests and Rivers Are Connected

What happens in our forests doesn’t stay in our forests.

Mountain snowpack feeds streams and rivers that sustain wetlands, riparian corridors, agricultural lands, and communities downstream. When forests experience severe wildfire, subsequent storms can carry ash, sediment, and debris into waterways, affecting water quality, aquatic habitat, and watershed function.

These connections matter tremendously for birds.

Western Tanagers depend on forest habitats, while Lewis’s Woodpeckers use open woodlands and standing dead trees for nesting and foraging. Along our rivers, Yellow Warblers nest among willows and other streamside vegetation, while Bald Eagles rely on healthy aquatic ecosystems and large trees for nesting and perching. Each species reminds us that healthy landscapes are not uniform. They are dynamic, diverse, and shaped by natural ecological processes.

As explored in our recent article, What Birds Reveal About Fire, Forests, and Resilience, science-based forest management must recognize these differences. Prescribed fire, managed wildfire, and carefully designed thinning can support forest resilience in appropriate settings, but approaches must be tailored to ecological conditions and wildlife needs.

Protecting watershed health means understanding these relationships across entire landscapes, not treating forests, rivers, and wildlife habitat as separate priorities.

Investing in Conservation and Our Connection to Nature

Proposition 137 also recognizes something Coloradans understand well: resilient natural landscapes sustain the outdoor experiences we cherish. River corridors provide essential habitat for migratory birds alongside opportunities for fishing, paddling, and birdwatching. Forests and wetlands support diverse wildlife while offering places for hiking, camping, exploring, and connecting with nature.

The measure directs funding through established programs, including Great Outdoors Colorado, Department of Natural Resources, Colorado State Forest Service, Colorado Parks and Wildlife, and the Outdoor Recreation Industry Office. Together, these programs  support wildfire risk mitigation, forest and watershed restoration and conservation projects, outdoor recreation, and opportunities for more Coloradans to experience the outdoors.

These investments could help advance conservation projects, strengthen watershed resilience, and support the outdoor recreation economies that many Colorado communities depend upon.

Conservation and outdoor recreation need not be competing values when approached thoughtfully. Both depend on functioning ecosystems, healthy watersheds, and stewardship that protects sensitive habitats while providing opportunities for people to connect with nature.

The Work Ahead

At Audubon Rockies, we see what thoughtful investment and collaboration can accomplish. Across Colorado, partnerships among landowners, restoration practitioners, agencies, conservation organizations, and local communities are helping reconnect streams to their floodplains, restore wetlands, and strengthen habitat for birds and wildlife. Proposition 137 offers an opportunity to build upon this work.

But dedicated funding is a beginning, not an ecological outcome. Success will depend on sound science, meaningful local engagement, transparent decision-making, and accountability for results. Investments must reflect the needs of individual landscapes and the people who live and work within them.

Colorado has taken an important step toward sustained conservation funding. The responsibility now is to translate that opportunity into healthier forests, functioning rivers, resilient wildlife habitat, and outdoor spaces that future generations can continue to enjoy.

When we protect Coloradoโ€™s forests and rivers, we protect the birds, communities, and ways of life that depend on them.

Lewis’s Woodpecker, Cabin Lake Viewing Blinds, Deschutes National Forest, Near Fort Rock, Oregon

U.S. Senate votes to proceed with permitting reform debate (BAAJA) — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org)

A tiny house that ended up in Junction Creek after early November torrential rains turned the normally modest-sized stream into a raging monster that crushed bridges, wrecked roads, ripped the foundations from under homes, tore up hundreds of large trees, jumped its banks and turned a Durango street into a river, and left tons of thick, dense, muck in its wake. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

November 9, 2026

๐Ÿ”ญ OVERSIGHT (or lack thereof) ๐Ÿ‘ฎ๐Ÿผ

The U.S. Senate just voted today to proceed with debate on the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, aimed at streamlining and accelerating federal environmental reviews and permitting for major projects.

The legislation has opened a nasty rift within the environmental movement, one that was not soothed by the billโ€™s sponsorโ€™s recent amendment attempting to address concerns. In recent days, opposition has mounted, with even Al Gore coming out against the legislation as itโ€™s currently written. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump urged the billโ€™s passage in a social media post, calling it a โ€œBIG WIN for U.S. ENERGY INDEPENDENCE and DOMINANCE.โ€

After the bill was first introduced, many climate hawks, Abundance adherents, and clean energy industry leaders threw their weight behind the bill, saying it is necessary to rapidly decarbonize the power grid and address the climate crisis. But more traditional green groups, tribal nations, and historic preservation advocates have pushed back hard on the legislationโ€™s provisions that weaken bedrock environmental laws and the National Historic Preservation Act.

While the legislation likely would make it easier and quicker to build solar and wind projects and the transmission needed to ferry that energy from where itโ€™s generated to where itโ€™s needed, it would do the same for fossil fuel projects, such as natural gas or oil pipelines. It would also bar a future administration from nixing a project that a previous administration authorized. This would have blocked the Trump administration from cancelling permitted wind projects, but also would have kept the Biden administration from axing the Keystone XL pipeline.

As more of these details have emerged, prominent clean energy advocates, such as Bill McKibben, and climate activists, including Al Gore, have come out in opposition to the legislation. A major concern is that the Trump administration would use the reforms to push through destructive energy projects.

At its core, the legislation tweaks major laws, including the Endangered Species Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Clean Water Act, and even the 1872 General Mining Law in ways that not only accelerate permitting timelines for major projects, but also makes it more difficult for tribes, states, advocacy groups, and the general public to stop or force changes to the proposed development.

I wrote about some of this for High Country News last week.

In May of 2023, the Biden administrationโ€™s Bureau of Land Management issued a final approval to Pattern Energy to construct its long-planned SunZia transmission line, which was designed to carry wind power from eastern New Mexico to a major grid hub in the Phoenix area, where it could then be transmitted across the Southwest. Clean energy advocates lauded the move, since it would enable Southwestern states to tame the solar โ€œduck curveโ€ โ€” or fill in the power gap left when the sun goes down โ€” with wind power rather than natural gas generation, thus reducing the gridโ€™s carbon footprint.

But SunZia was also held up as a prime example for why permitting reform for these kinds of projects is necessary. The approval came after 17 years of review by various federal agencies, and after a previous 2015 BLM approval was scrapped and the project sent back to the drawing board after New Mexico regulators balked due to potential impacts to migratory birds. The climate crisis needs to be addressed now, advocates said, and there wasnโ€™t time for these clean energy-enabling projects to wade through the bureaucracy for a decade or more โ€” only to be potentially blocked by a post-approval lawsuit. They called on Congress to clear a path through the morass of red tape to speed up such projects.

The call was heeded in September, when a group of Republican and Democratic senators, including public lands champion Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM) and hard right Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), introduced the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, aimed at streamlining and accelerating federal environmental reviews and permitting for major projects. Groups as disparate as Americans for a Clean Energy Grid and the American Petroleum Institute got together to support the legislation in concert with the Abundance movement and climate hawks. The Breakthrough Instituteโ€™s Marc Levitt called it โ€œa heroic breakthrough for permitting reform โ€ฆ that opens the door to a new era of climate policy, infrastructure, and long-term price stabilization.โ€ The NRDC praised the billโ€™s transmission-related provisions, saying the red-tape-slashing policies, which the Columbia Center on Global Energy Policy estimates would cut the average transmission permitting timeline by 96 months, โ€œare an essential component of accelerating the electrification and decarbonization of the power sector and achieving greenhouse gas reduction targets.โ€

Yet one personโ€™s red tape is another personโ€™s environmental safeguards. In order to achieve its goal of accelerating transmission and other energy projects, the legislation takes aim at bedrock environmental laws such as the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the Clean Water Act, and the National Historic Protection Act. And to get Republicans on board, the billโ€™s provisions had to be extended to apply not just to clean energy projects, but also fossil fuel ones. To more ecology-minded green groups, tribal nations, and more progressive federal lawmakers, the gutting of these laws goes too far, and could result in damage to communities, landscapes, and cultural sites. Western Environmental Law Centerโ€™s Erik Schlenker-Goodrich called the bill a โ€œturd grenade.โ€ Even the NRDC called these provisions โ€œdeeply flawed,โ€ and vowed to get them changed before the bill goes to a vote on Nov. 9.

Hereโ€™s a rundown of some of the more significant changes under the proposed bill, and what they might mean:

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)

NEPA, signed into law in 1970, requires federal agencies to consider the potential environmental impacts of major federal developments through environmental impact statements (EIS) or environmental analyses (EA). It is considered the bedrock environmental law, is most often blamed for project delays and would be subject to the most significant changes under BAAJA. Those include:

  • While the 2023 Fiscal Responsibility Act put a two-year time limit on completion of an EIS and one year for an EA, it did not set a limit for a final decision. BAAJA would require the lead NEPA agency to issue a decision within 45 days of the EISโ€™s completion, and also speed up federal authorizations for other participating agencies. If the agencies failed to meet the deadline, the lead officers on the review would essentially be tied to their desks until the analysis was completed. This would significantly accelerate timelines, as the median completion time for an EIS is currently about 4.5 years.
  • BAAJA would limit organizationsโ€™ ability to file lawsuits against NEPA decisions and for what reasons, and sets a higher bar for who has โ€œstandingโ€ to bring such a suit. It also significantly shortens the statute of limitations for lawsuits, and would skip district courts and go straight to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, potentially putting plaintiffs at a disadvantage.
  • A court would not be allowed to put an injunction on a project based only on a violation of NEPA or the National Historical Protection Act (NHPA). This means construction could go forward โ€” and the environmental, human health or cultural impact realized โ€” even while a lawsuit was pending. And even if a court rules against the agency and finds it has violated NEPA, it will merely send the EIS or EA back to the agency and ask for fixes, not vacate the approval, meaning, again, that development could continue along with its impacts.
  • BAAJA would exempt from NEPA: projects already subjected to state or tribal reviews; repair, maintenance, replacement, upgrading, rebuilding, or modification of electricity transmission or distribution lines or substations and natural gas facilities; energy storage projects if built โ€œat or nearโ€ a transmission line.

โ€œIn short, BAAJA would pull NEPAโ€™s principal teethโ€”the possibility of a court order blocking a project for violating NEPA,โ€ writes Michael B. Gerrard, Andrew Sabin Professor of Professional Practice at Columbia Law School.

National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)

Congress passed NHPA in 1966 to protect historic, cultural and archaeological sites, and requires the jurisdictional agency to determine whether a proposed development might affect historic properties. If so, it triggers Section 106 of the law, often called โ€œidentify and avoid,โ€ which requires the agency to consult with tribal nations or other potential stakeholders to identify potentially affected properties, and to work to avoid, minimize or mitigate adverse effects on those properties. Section 106 is often the only thing standing between a bulldozer blade and an ancient pueblo or other cultural site. Changes under BAAJA include:

  • The bill would require that Section 106 reviews are finished by the deadline for the NEPA EIS or EA, potentially significantly shortening the timeline for tribal consultation and cultural inventories and archaeological surveys, which can take years for major projects such as pipelines or transmission lines. Also, if a tribal historic preservation officer misses the deadline, they could be penalized and the tribal nation could lose federal funding.
  • BAAJA would raise the threshold for triggering Section 106 reviews, effectively limiting the scope of and exempting some projects from the analyses, while also removing the requirement that tribal nations be consulted before identifying a historic property (they would only be consulted after the determination). That, in turn, would limit tribal nationsโ€™ involvement in reviews of proposed developments that may adversely affect their lands or cultural sites.
  • As with NEPA, the bill would block courts from issuing injunctions or vacating approvals for proposed projects, even if the court finds against the agency.
Native land loss 1776 to 1930. Credit: Alvin Chang/Ranjani Chakraborty

The National Congress of American Indians, along with other tribal organizations, in an Oct. 9 letter, called on the legislationโ€™s sponsors to withdraw Title III โ€” the section concerning NHPA โ€” from the bill altogether, saying these provisions are โ€œin deep conflict with federal trust and treaty obligations to engage sovereign Tribal Nations in government-to-government Tribal consultation and to protect our irreplaceable cultural heritage. โ€ฆ Tribal Nations should not be forced to bear the brunt of these cultural and spiritual harms so the nation can further develop and transport its energy resources. We have already sacrificed the majority of our lands and natural resourcesโ€”oftentimes through force or coercionโ€”upon which the United States has become the world power it is today.โ€

Clean Water Act:

When a pipeline, transmission line or other project crosses over, under or otherwise affects a jurisdictional body of water, the Clean Water Actโ€™s Section 401 requires that the development be certified by the relevant states or tribal nations to protect water quality. States and tribes have used this authority to block projects or to push the developers to reroute them or redesign them to mitigate impacts. BAAJA would:

  • Limit Section 401 powers by narrowly defining the kinds of water quality impacts that could trigger a stateโ€™s or tribal nationโ€™s denial. It puts the burden of proof on the state or tribe to show that the proposed project would harm water quality regardless of modifications or mitigation.
  • Curtail the amount of time the Environmental Protection Agency has to veto Army Corps of Engineers Clean Water Act permits for major projects. The EPA used this veto power to halt the Pebble Mine in Alaska. By shortening the time frame, it would preclude a new administration from blocking a project approved under a previous one.

Endangered Species Act (ESA)

BAAJA would:

  • Reduce the Fish and Wildlife Services ESA consultation time limit from 90 days to 60 days.
  • Exempt activities within rights of way of certain federally funded highways from the ESA, and allow states to take over the consultation process. This would create inconsistency from state to state, sometimes even for the same project, and could imperil endangered species in states that are hostile to environmental protections.
  • Hamper judicial review via tighter timelines and sending any lawsuits straight to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

General Mining Law

This is not an environmental protection law. Itโ€™s quite the opposite, actually, having allowed mining companies to ravage public lands since 1872. However, in 2022 a federal judge blocked the proposed Rosemont copper mine in Arizona from dumping tailings and waste rock on public land on which it had staked mining claims.

The Rosemont Decision, as it has come to be known, relied on a provision in the law that says a mining claim is not valid unless the claimant proves it contains valuable minerals, and therefore cannot be used for those purposes. The exception are a type of claim called mill sites, which are no larger than five acres and intended to be used for mills or other mining-support facilities (including waste disposal), must be non-contiguous with the mineral claims, and to which the valuable mineral requirement does not apply. A mine is usually limited to just one mill site.

BAAJA would allow a mining firm to stake as many mill sites as โ€œreasonably necessary for its operations โ€ฆ and โ€ฆ use or occupy public land in accordance with approved plan of operations.โ€ This would effectively nullify the Rosemont Decision and allow large mining companies to claim hundreds or even thousands of acres of public land for waste disposal and storage.

Project Certainty

BAAJA would block a president from cancelling energy projects approved by a previous administration by prohibiting โ€œany new action that would revoke, rescind, withdraw, terminate, suspend, amend, or alter a Federal authorization or permit in effect on or after Sept. 16, 2026, or take any other action to interfere with or prevent the construction or operation at full capacity of a project that has secured all necessary Federal authorizations.โ€

This is clearly aimed at the Trump administrationโ€™s penchant for cancelling onshore and offshore wind projects and solar projects on public land. But it also would have prevented the Biden administration, for example, from cancelling the contested Keystone XL pipeline on his first days in the Oval Office.

Also, the provision barring an agency from taking โ€œany other actionโ€ to prevent โ€œoperation at full capacityโ€ could be used to block regulators from enforcing pollution limits, worker safety rules and human health and safety protections.

Is Permitting Reform Really Necessary?

The aforementioned SunZia project is certainly a good example of how long the NEPA process can take. But it also demonstrates how the currently arduous permitting path can improve a project and yet still not be rigorous enough to protect important cultural and environmental sites. In New Mexico, for example, conservationists and state officials were able to use the process to push the developers to reroute the path to avoid harming migratory bird flyways, garnering the project โ€” and the process โ€” Audubon Southwestโ€™s endorsement as a case study of how permitting works.

But in Arizona, when Indigenous nations and conservation groups tried to get SunZia to reroute the line away from the fragile, biodiverse San Pedro River Valley to protect birds and other wildlife along with culturally significant sites, Arizona regulators shrugged them off โ€” not surprisingly, since they tend to be more amenable to such projects and less responsive to environmental concerns than their New Mexican counterparts.

So when Arizona regulators unanimously approved the project in November 2022, they removed any incentive for SunZia to reroute the line in Arizona the way it did in New Mexico. The BLMโ€™s preferred route remained alongside the San Pedro River, despite the objections of tribal nations and conservationists. An ensuing lawsuit continues to work its way through the courts, but has failed to stop or pause construction โ€” even under the current, more rigorous permitting regime.

Now the San Pedro River faces another challenge: A proposed natural gas pipeline called Desert Southwest, which would carry methane from the Permian Basin to Arizona, passing right through the Pedro River Valley north of Tucson. Under the current permitting regime, the project would be subjected to rigorous NEPA and National Historic Preservation Act reviews, while tribes and states would have more say under the Clean Water Act. But if the permitting reform legislation becomes law, the project could be exempted from these reviews, meant to protect people and places, altogether.


โ›ˆ๏ธ WACKY WEATHER WATCHโšก๏ธ

Iโ€™ll be doing a big overview/data dump/historical context dispatch on the Four Corners flooding in a dispatch later this week. But for now, here are a few images I captured while traveling around the region, gazing with awe and dismay at the destruction inflicted.

Overturned tanks at an oil and gas facility near Montezuma Creek, Utah. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.
Wrecked Forest Service road in the Junction Creek drainage near Durango. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.
A bridge used to cross Hermosa Creek just beyond the pictured gate. It was carried away by the flooding. Jonathan P. Thompson photo

#Nevada Judge Could Dictate Wyoming’s Future Share Of #ColoradoRiver Water — Cowboy State Daily #COriver #aridification

Wyoming State Engineer Brandon Gebhart, left, and state water attorney Chris Brown updated lawmakers on Friday about escalating tensions over Colorado River water rights. (Courtesy Wyoming Legislative Service Office)

Click the link to read the article on the Cowboy State Daily website (Mark Heinz). Here’s an excerpt:

November 6, 2026

As Nevada and Arizona prepare for a federal court battle with the U.S. Department of the Interior over dwindling water supplies from the Colorado River, state officials are warning legislators that Wyoming could be impacted by the fight. State Engineerย Brandon Gebhardt represents Wyoming on the Upper Colorado River Commission. On Friday in Casper, he told the Legislatureโ€™s Select Water Committee that the commission hadnโ€™t yet decided whether the four Upper Basin states will intervene in the court battle.

Water committee co-chair Rep. Martha Lawley, R-Worland, said the potential effects of the federal court battle involving Nevada on Wyoming canโ€™t be taken lightly.

โ€œWe could end up in a situation where a federal court in the state of Nevada could be taking over the (water) management. Really, the job of the Bureau of Reclamation,โ€ she said.

Gebhardt was joined in updating the committee by Chris Brown, supervising attorney general for the water section in the Wyoming Attorney Generalโ€™s Office. At one point, Lawley asked Brown if her assessment of the situation was accurate.

โ€œMadame Chair, from my personal perspective, you are on target,โ€ Brown responded.

Brown at one point suggested that tensions over the Colorado River could end up before the Supreme Court.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

The latest #ElNiรฑo/Southern Oscillation (#ENSO) Diagnostic Discussion is hot off the presses from the #Climate Prediction Center

Figure 7. Official ENSO probabilities for the Niรฑo-3.4 relative sea surface temperature index
(5ยฐN-5ยฐS, 170ยฐW -120ยฐW) minus tropical mean (20ยฐN-20ยฐS). The relative index is re-scaled to
match the variance of the traditional index. Figure updated 12 November 2026. Higher resolution
image/table: https://cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/enso/roni/probabilities/

Click the link to read the discussion on the Climate Prediction Center website:

ENSO Alert System Status: El Niรฑo Advisory

Synopsis: El Niรฑo continues to strengthen, with a strong-to-very strong El Niรฑo likely through January-March 2027 (remaining greater than a 79% chance).

Compared to last month, El Niรฑo strengthened as sea surface temperature anomalies exceeded 4.0ยฐC, extending farther westward across the eastern equatorial Pacific Ocean. The Niรฑo indices increased, reaching +2.5ยฐC in Niรฑo-3.4, +3.6ยฐC in Niรฑo-3, and +4.4ยฐC in Niรฑo-1+2. The equatorial subsurface temperature index (average from 180ยฐโ€“100ยฐW) remained significantly above average, associated with a deeper-than-average thermocline and anomalies exceeding +10.0ยฐC at depth in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Low-level westerly and upper-level easterly wind anomalies extended from the western to the east-central equatorial Pacific. Convection and rainfall remained enhanced from the central to the eastern Pacific, while suppressed conditions persisted over Indonesia. The traditional and equatorial Southern Oscillation indices were consistently negative. Collectively, the coupled ocean-atmosphere system reflected the ongoing evolution of El Niรฑo.

The CPC Official ENSO outlook, which synthesizes multiple models from North America and abroad, indicates El Niรฑo will continue to strengthen before beginning to weaken in early 2027. Chances for a historic event exceeding previous El Niรฑos dating back to 1950 (+2.5ยฐC or more for a 3-month RONI value) are now ~60% for the Octoberโ€“December and Novemberโ€“January periods, remaining at better than even odds. Even with a very strong El Niรฑo, the chances of experiencing impacts consistent with El Niรฑo are higher, though not guaranteed (see CPC outlooks for probabilities of seasonal anomalies). In summary, El Niรฑo continues to strengthen, with a strong-to-very strong El Niรฑo likely through Januaryโ€“March 2027 (remaining greater than a 79% chance).

Figure 8. ENSO strength probabilities for the Niรฑo-3.4 relative sea surface temperature index
(5ยฐN-5ยฐS, 170ยฐW-120ยฐW) minus tropical mean (20ยฐN-20ยฐS). The relative index is re-scaled to
match the variance of the traditional index. Figure updated 12 November 2026. Higher resolution
image/table: https://cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/enso/roni/strengths/

#Drought news November 12, 2026: Despite little rainfall in the Four Corners region of the S.W., additional improvements were made as a result of substantial rainfalls over the last several weeks, leading to tremendous flooding in some places and rapidly-filling reservoirs

Click on a thumbnail graphc to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

This week’s drought picture featured a mixed bag of conditions with worsening drought in the lower Mississippi valley and the lower Great Lakes region. Meanwhile, prolific rainfall continued in parts of the Southwest, South, and Southeast, leading to significant drought improvement across southern and western Texas and parts of the Southern Appalachian region. Additional drought improvement was found over the western Great Lakes in Minnesota and Wisconsin and parts of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Despite little rainfall in the Four Corners region of the Southwest, additional improvements were made as a result of substantial rainfalls over the last several weeks, leading to tremendous flooding in some places and rapidly-filling reservoirs…

High Plains

The High Plains States were the least active in terms of drought category changes this past week as little precipitation fell. With evaporation rates reduced this time of year, any worsening drought moves at a much slower pace. Only spotty drought improvements from rainfall occurred in Eastern South Dakota into Northeastern Nebraska, and Southwestern Kansas…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending November 10, 2026.

West

Despite an overall lack of substantial rainfall in the West this past week, continued drought improvements were made across many states from Southeast Montana southward to New Mexico and westward to Southern California and Nevada. Near-record soil wetness has resulted from the recent weeks of tremendous El Niรฑo-influenced rainfall. It hasn’t been all good news in the West, as some drought degradation was introduced in northern Idaho and northwestern Montana this past week.

Many reservoirs have been filling up at an exceptionally rapid pace in the Desert Southwest, making up for months of declining levels over just the last few weeks. The Navajo reservoir in Northwestern New Mexico has added over 600,000 acre-feet of water since mid-September from recent rain and flooding events, and now sits at 110% of average storage for this time of year. Lake Powell behind the Glen Canyon dam has also benefited tremendously with the addition of almost 1.4 million acre-feet of water since mid-September. However, Lake Powell is still only at 42% of average storage for this time of year…

South

The drought pattern continued to be quite polarized across the Southern States, with exceptional drought worsening across Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Southeastern Oklahoma, and Eastern Texas. According to the National Centers for Environmental Information, 20 to 30 inches of rainfall is required over the span of 3 months to end the exceptional drought in these states. In stark contrast, substantial rains fell in Southern and Western Texas resulting in one and two categorical reductions in drought intensity, especially over South Texas where up to 9 inches of rain fell. Significant drought relief occurred across much of Western and Central Tennessee where several inches of rain fell in some places this past week helping to reduce the extreme drought to some extent…

Looking Ahead

Over the next week, a potential Norโ€™easter could bring substantial rainfall to interior portions of Pennsylvania, New York, and Southern New England. A series of potent weather systems should impact the West Coast from Central California up to Washington, with up to 5 inches or more of precipitation being predicted by the NOAA Weather Prediction Center through next Tuesday. Another axis of substantial rainfall is predicted from Eastern Texas into Oklahoma and Southern Kansas. The Northern Plains and the Southeast are predicted to stay mostly dry. The NOAA Climate Prediction Center depicts well above normal temperatures across much of the Plains States, with below normal temperatures in the Southeast. Precipitation is projected to be above average in the Southwestern U.S. and below average over the eastern half of the country.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending November 10, 2026.

A monstrous #ElNiรฑo has arrived. Hereโ€™s what it means for where you live. From torrential rain to overwhelming tides, this yearโ€™s growing El Niรฑo could make for a warmer, wetter, and weirder winter — Grist.org #ENSO

Click the link to read the article on the Grist website:

November 9, 2026

A monster is growing in the Pacific โ€” not the kraken, but something far scarier and deadlier. El Niรฑo is a natural phenomenon in which a band of warm water forms every three to five years off the coast of South America. It raises ocean water temperatures by just a few extra degrees for typically nine to 12 months and ends up injecting an extraordinary amount of energy into the sky. Itโ€™s already the strongest El Niรฑo on record, and it might not even peak for about another month or two.

โ€œThose are actually really big changes for the ocean,โ€ Art Miller, a climate scientist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, told Grist in September. โ€œThe ocean has a lot of heat content โ€” 1,000 times more ability to hold heat than the atmosphere โ€” so slight changes in the ocean surface temperatures can actually do a lot for the atmosphere.โ€

While scientists are still trying to figure out how climate change might be influencing El Niรฑo, some research suggests that rising temperatures have led to stronger El Niรฑo events. At the very least, we can use this eventโ€™s temporary warming to imagine what the climate will look like by default in two decades, as planetary temperatures continue to rise.

The effects of the current El Niรฑo will be global, and they will be severe. Scientists have estimated that the additional heat alone could kill around 450,000 people worldwide. Drought is gripping some places, like the Amazon rainforest, while extreme rainfall hits others, like the Greater Horn of Africa. And the polar vortex โ€” another phenomenon that periodically blasts the eastern and central United States with frigid air โ€” interacts with El Niรฑo in ways that can scramble weather even further. El Niรฑo, then, wonโ€™t just fire heat into the atmosphere โ€” it will fundamentally shift weather patterns the world over.

The atmospheric changes are so complex that different parts of the U.S. will endure vastly different impacts from El Niรฑo. (Thereโ€™s also a lot of uncertainty here: Models can predict general changes across regions, but no one can tell you what the weather will be in a given spot a month from now.) California, for example, typically sees increased rainfall and flooding. The Midwest might be relatively better off with a milder, drier winter, whereas the Southeast could get colder and wetter.

Which is all to say: Things are going to get very weird, and often very dangerous, across the U.S. To break it all down by region, Grist spoke to state climatologists and meteorologists. Hereโ€™s what they expect in the months ahead.

This winterโ€™s outlook, region by region

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationโ€™s outlook for December through February predicts a warm North and a wet South. Darker shading means higher confidence in the forecast…

Source: NOAA Climate Prediction Center seasonal outlook for December 2026 through February 2027. โ€œSlightly favorsโ€ means a 33โ€“50 percent chance, โ€œfavorsโ€ means 50 percent or more, and โ€œequal chancesโ€ means no category is favored. Hawaiสปi is shaded from CPCโ€™s Hawaiian Islands outlook. Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands are unshaded; NOAAโ€™s outlook suggests warmer temperatures in this region but publishes no corresponding probability. Clayton Aldern / Grist

Alaska

Alaska is Americaโ€™s largest state and home to all of its Arctic territory. That makes it uniquely vulnerable to the effects of climate change, which is warming the region several times faster than the rest of the planet. El Niรฑo years add a blast of heat on top of that warming, intensifying local effects in the short term.

A strong El Niรฑo, like the current one, tends to strengthen the Aleutian Low, a broad area of low pressure over the North Pacific that helps shape Alaskaโ€™s winter weather. But El Niรฑo is only one of many factors influencing the Lowโ€™s strength and location. Depending on how these conditions line up in any given year, the state could experience vastly different outcomes. That makes the effects of El Niรฑo especially difficult to predict in Alaska, said Martin Stuefer, the state climatologist and director of the Alaska Climate Research Center at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

โ€œWe have to be on the lookout for more intense events, thatโ€™s for sure,โ€ Stuefer said. โ€œBut we should be cautious about making conclusions based on what we know now.โ€

Evidence from previous El Niรฑo events indicates that populated regions along the Gulf of Alaska and the stateโ€™s southeast might experience warmer winter temperatures, and precipitation may fall as rain instead of snow, Stuefer said. According to the National Weather Service, most strong El Niรฑo years have resulted in below-average snowfall in Alaska.

Anything that intensifies warming in the state isnโ€™t welcome news. Climate change is already melting away sea ice, leaving Alaskaโ€™s vast shorelines exposed to erosion during storms. Itโ€™s also thawing permafrost โ€” the frozen ground found across much of Alaska โ€” to collapse. Meanwhile, warmer waters are setting the stage for harmful algae blooms and changing the distribution of fish species that Native Alaskans have depended on for generations. A strong El Niรฑo in the coming months could add to these pressures.

โ€” Sachi Mulkey

Hawaiสปi and the Pacific Islands

Hawaiสปi and the Pacific have had a tough year already, and El Niรฑo threatens to cause even more disruption. Low-pressure storms known as Kona lows and hurricanes have hit Hawaiสปi throughout the summer and fall, leading to severe flooding and power outages. Elsewhere in the region, super-typhoons like Sinlaku made landfall, causing 17 deaths in the western Pacific.

In the coming months, Pacific islands are broadly expected to face drier conditions and stronger storms. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, for example, Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands are facing an above-normal typhoon season, which will build on an already destructive summer and fall period. The threat is in addition to the rising probability of storms, fueled by warming ocean waters due to climate change.

โ€œIt only takes one storm to come over the island to cause crazy rainfall and devastation,โ€ said Ryan Longman, who is the consortium program director at the University of Hawaiสปi at Mฤnoa for the Pacific Islands Climate Adaptation Science Center.

The Pacific islands are also bracing for a drier winter and spring. In Hawaiสปi, a strong El Niรฑo can lead to a drier wet season, which typically lasts from October to March. That could mean less water available for residential, agricultural, and commercial uses and elevated wildfire risk.

The landscape is currently thick with grass and other vegetation from a historically wet summer. As the climate shifts toward drier conditions, those fuels on the landscape will dry up, increasing the chances of wildfires. Longman suggested that residents clear dry grasses and other fuels from their properties to reduce their risk.

For some Pacific islands, historic patterns suggest that the worst drought effects come the year following El Niรฑoโ€™s onset, meaning the most severe impacts could arrive in early to mid-2027.

โ€” Joseph Lee

Midwest

The Midwest may catch a break when El Niรฑo peaks this winter.

The cyclical climate pattern is mostly associated with milder, drier winters in the Midwest. El Niรฑo shifts the polar jet stream โ€” the band of fast-moving Arctic air high in the atmosphere โ€” farther north, making it less likely that cold winds will dip into the region, resulting in warmer temperatures.

That doesnโ€™t rule out snow and winter storms, though. It only means that average temperatures between December and February tend to be somewhat warmer. During recent strong El Niรฑo events, winter temperatures ranged from 3 degrees Fahrenheit to more than 8 degrees F warmer than the 20th-century average, according to the U.S. Geological Survey.

The Midwest has already experienced a warmer fall this year, said Daria Kluver, a professor in the Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Central Michigan University. Average September temperatures across the region were the highest in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationโ€™s 132-year record. Illinois and Missouri had their warmest September on record; Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, Indiana, and Michigan also saw above-average temperatures.

That warmth will continue into the winter. And reduced ice cover on the Great Lakes could contribute to the warmer temperatures, Kluver said. Without as much ice, warmth stored in the lakes over the summer is likely to slowly dissipate into the surrounding air. The changes in ice cover could impact Great Lakes economies, recreation, and the ecosystems that depend on it.

Fall has been dry so far, but winter might not be. Kluver said precipitation levels will depend on other dynamics like Arctic sea-ice levels and Atlantic Ocean currents. But the El Niรฑo typically tilts the odds toward less snowfall and more rain or ice.

โ€œWhether you find that good or bad maybe depends on what you do for winter recreation,โ€ Kluver said.

El Niรฑo could also mean a reprieve from the Midwestโ€™s record-setting tornadoes next year, according to Chris Callahan, a climate scientist and assistant professor at Indiana University Bloomington.

โ€œWe are likely to have a relatively quiet tornado season in the spring, because those tornadoes are shifted south into [states] like Arkansas, Georgia, and so they might have a more active tornado season,โ€ Callahan said.

โ€” Vivian La and Juanpablo Ramirez-Franco

Northeast

The Northeast has so far avoided El Niรฑoโ€™s impacts โ€” but thatโ€™s about to change.

Brad Pugh, a meteorologist with the National Weather Serviceโ€™s extended prediction division, said the unusually strong El Niรฑo this year gives the Northeast more than a 50 percent chance of a milder-than-normal winter. There could also be more precipitation, he added, though those odds will vary within the region.

While areas farther east are generally more likely to be wet, he said, โ€œitโ€™s hard to tell how much is going to be rain or snow.โ€

Government outlooks donโ€™t include snow totals because snow is difficult to predict far ahead. But the winter outlook from AccuWeather, a private forecasting company, projects fewer flakes for the Northeast. That, however, doesnโ€™t mean the region wonโ€™t see snow, Pugh added.

โ€œThe forecast leaning on the wetter side does raise the prospects that there could be some high-impact winter storms,โ€ he said, pointing to the I-95 corridor between New York and Boston as one area that could be hit. He suggested keeping an eye on the NWSโ€™ eight- to 14-day forecasts to get a more accurate and timely sense of what weather may be on the way.

Even water that falls as rain could be concerning, said Auroop Ganguly, a hydrologist and co-director of Northeastern Universityโ€™s Global Resilience Institute. โ€œIf I were an urban planner, Iโ€™d plan more for the possibility of flooding in urban areas,โ€ he said. A mix of rain, snow, and ice on the roads could also make driving dangerous. โ€œIโ€™d prepare for somewhat more hazardous conditions on the roads.โ€

Still, many in the region may welcome El Niรฑoโ€™s arrival, especially after last winter, which was the coldest in a decade. Milder temperatures this year could, for example, lower heating needs at a time when heating oil and electricity prices are spiking.

As for the prospect of a warmer winter in the Northeast, said Ganguly, โ€œMost people would say, โ€˜Iโ€™ll take it.’โ€

โ€” Tik Root

Northern Great Plains

There is less certainty about the total El Niรฑo impacts for the Northern Great Plains compared to the rest of the country. Nebraska, Montana, and the Dakotas are expecting a warmer-than-average winter, but rain and snowfall forecasts across these states are less conclusive.

In Nebraska, some of those effects may already be emerging. Earlier this fall, the eastern part of the state experienced milder temperatures and heavy rain, leading to flash flooding. Wetter-than-normal conditions are likely to continue in eastern Nebraska through winter, increasing the risk of additional floods, said Eric Hunt, a University of Nebraska-Lincoln agriculture meteorology and climate resilience extension educator. The state could still see intense winter storms, and western Nebraska could experience a wetter winter, though those forecasts are less certain.

Farther north in the Dakotas, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration has forecasted a 40 percent to 60 percent chance of higher average temperatures from December to February. For North Dakota, that still means average temperatures below freezing. Winter also tends to be dry in both states, and forecasts for precipitation are variable, according to both statesโ€™ climatologists.

In South Dakota, a snowy winter could alleviate drought, replenish surface water, and reduce fire risk in the Black Hills, said state climatologist Laura Edwards. A dry winter in the state could be a tipping point for drought conditions next spring.

In North Dakota, itโ€™s not clear if any precipitation this winter would improve drought conditions, said Daryl Ritchison, North Dakota state climatologist and director of the North Dakota Agricultural Weather Network. One winter storm could push seasonal totals above average for precipitation for the season, but if the winter remains dry and spring rains are slow to arrive, fire risk might increase.

Montana faces much of the same uncertainty. In the Northern Rockies, the odds favor a below-average snow year โ€” but only slightly, said Kyle Bocinsky, the director of climate extension with the Montana Climate Office. Montana has experienced four strong El Niรฑo events in the past 40 years; three saw below-normal precipitation and snowpack, but one saw above-normal snowpack. โ€œItโ€™s a small sample size,โ€ Bocinsky said, which makes it hard to definitively say what the impacts will be. โ€œItโ€™s still a 50-50 chance,โ€ he said.

Bocinsky said warmer temperatures could make for a rainy winter similar to last year, particularly at lower elevations. Like much of the Great Plains, eastern Montana is still in drought carried over from last yearโ€™s mild winter. Farmers and ranchers are hoping snow settles on the landscape this year, but itโ€™s just too soon to tell, he said.

โ€” Ellis Juhlin and Anila Yoganathan

Northwest

The Pacific Northwest typically sits in the center lane of a storm highway. Every winter, ocean storms travel across this familiar route, delivering a steady supply of the cool, drizzly weather that gives the region its gloomy charm. But El Niรฑo is likely to reroute this storm track to the south, dumping rain onto sunny California instead. This often leaves the Northwest warmer, and sometimes drier, than usual.

That combination could be a double whammy for mountain snow, which is the main source of water for much of the Northwest, since snow canโ€™t form if itโ€™s too warm or too dry. โ€œIf we were to get both of those this year โ€” both the warmer temperatures and less precipitation โ€” that could spell trouble for our snowpack,โ€ said Jacob Genuise, an engagement climatologist at the Washington State Climate Office.

Climate change is also slowly chipping away at snow levels. Since the mid-20th century, snow levels in Washingtonโ€™s Cascades have been steadily decreasing in both El Niรฑo and La Niรฑa years alike. These factors could lead to less snow stored in the mountains for next spring and summer, driving up the risk of drought or wildfires, and leaving less water available for irrigation, drinking water, or hydropower.

Source: Washington State Climate Office
Nick Bond / Washington State Climate Office / Clayton Aldern / Grist

On the coast, El Niรฑo can also lead to more tidal flooding. As ocean and wind patterns shift across the Pacific, seawater can get pushed toward the West Coast, raising high tide levels by several inches. This extra tidal boost could also combine with sea level rise, storm surges, or winter king tides to drive up the flood risk in Washingtonโ€™s and Oregonโ€™s coastal communities. โ€œItโ€™s not a huge effect,โ€ said Genuise. โ€œBut that can mean the difference between a property getting flooded or not during these El Niรฑo years.โ€

โ€” Jesse Nichols

Southwest

El Niรฑo often delivers rain and snow to the Southwest and could bring a glimmer of hope to a region suffering historic drought. Jon Meyer, assistant state climatologist at the Utah Climate Center, expects the weather pattern to bring โ€œfavorable storm activityโ€ to the desert Southwest, including Arizona and New Mexico, with effects bleeding into Nevada and parts of southern Utah and southern Colorado.

But northern Utah, which is home to most of the stateโ€™s population, โ€œis right in the bullโ€™s-eye of being very unpredictable,โ€ he said. Coloradoโ€™s outlook is also mixed. El Niรฑo tends to bring more precipitation in spring and fall, but it also typically creates drier conditions for the Northern Rockies, said Peter Goble, assistant state climatologist at the Colorado Climate Center.

โ€œThe strong El Niรฑo, as interesting a story as itโ€™s been,โ€ he said, โ€œdoesnโ€™t guarantee us anything.โ€

The region is in dire need of snowpack in the winter months ahead. Utahโ€™s Great Salt Lake hovers just a few inches above eclipsing the record-low elevation it set in 2022, and its vast exposed lake bed is drying into a dust source impacting the health of the roughly 2.5 million residents living in cities near its shores. Meanwhile, Lake Mead and Lake Powell, the nationโ€™s largest reservoirs, saw a fraction of their normal inflows from the Colorado River and set their own record lows over the fall. Around 40 million people in the West depend on water supplies delivered by the Colorado River system.

The early autumn run-up to the super El Niรฑo has already brought downpours, sending torrents through city streets and arroyos across the region. Arizona is already facing flash flooding and could now see tornadoes and other extreme weather, according to meteorologists at AccuWeather.

More moisture would boost desiccated reservoirs and reduce sleepless nights for farmers, but experts are already repeating an all-too-familiar warning: One good year wonโ€™t solve the regionโ€™s water woes. Western states saw record-breaking snow in 2023. Today, that moisture is gone, and both the Rio Grande and Colorado River basins look more stressed than ever. Climatologists say those extreme oscillations will become more common as climate change heats up the region.

โ€” Austin Corona and Leia Larsen

Early November brought even more heavy rainfall and destructive flooding in southwest #Colorado — Russ Schumacher (Colorado #Climate Center) #SanJuanRiver

Click the link to read the article on the Colorado Climate Center website (Russ Schumacher):

November 11, 2026

This update is later than I had intendedโ€”last week was busy, with an excellent Lower Arkansas Valley water summit in Rocky Ford, and our fall Colorado Climate Center staff retreat. (Rest assured that you have an outstanding group of people committed to being the best a state climate office can be here in Colorado!)

But us being busy at work is nothing compared to what the communities in southwest Colorado have gone through lately. Major flooding followed from a truly extreme rainstorm in late October. Then, around ten days later, another wave of tropical moisture moved into the southwestern United States and caused even worse flooding in many locations. At Pagosa Springs, the San Juan river crested even higher than in the flood the week before (or the flood last October). Itโ€™s possible that the flood crest was even higher than shown here owing to issues with the stream gage.

Hydrograph for the San Juan River at Pagosa Springs, showing the flood crests in late October and on November 2. From water.noaa.gov.

The damage was widespread, with homes lost and many crucial roadways washed out. The fate of the Pagosa Springs museum became one of the images that defined the flood.

The Durango area also saw extensive damage in the early-November flood; Mitch Tobin from the Water Desk has been sharing his photos documenting the situation in that area.

The aftermath of flooding in the Trimble area, north of Durango, Colorado, on November 4, 2026. Photo by Mitch Tobin. See more of his photos at https://www.waterdesk.photos/Colorado/Durango-Flooding-Nov-4-2026/n-6gCSqj

The details of the flooding have been extensively covered in local media like the Colorado Sunand the Durango Herald. Alan Gerard reviewed some of the challenges with the flood forecasts in this event, and I talked with Cory Reppenhagen of 9News about that topic as well. I expect that this event will motivate a lot of research going forward, because of the high impact of the floods and the unique forecasting challenges it highlighted.

Relentless rainfall since September

The early-November flood was (hopefully) the last in a string of heavy rainstorms that have affected southern Colorado going back to September. The first big storm was in mid-September, which caused some flooding around La Plata and Archuleta Counties, but was mostly viewed as welcome drought relief after many months of hot, dry conditions. Then, a couple weeks later, the remnants of Tropical Storm Polo moved across the southwest, with more heavy rainfall for southern Colorado. Then another storm in the middle of October. And then the extreme rainstorm and flood from October 22-25. And finally, the storm on November 1. The rainfall totals from the November 1 storm were not nearly as extreme as the late-October event, generally representing โ€œonlyโ€ a 10 to 25-year rainstorm for southwestern Colorado. But the precipitation totals since September have been staggering.

We just released our October monthly climate summary. It was the 4th warmest and 4th wettest October statewide โ€” please read it for more of the weather and climate numbers from the last month. For much of southern Colorado, it was the wettest September-October period on record.

Precipitation rank for September-October 2026 in Colorado. The darkest green color is where it was record-wet for these two months. Based on NOAA nClimGrid data, map from https://climate.colostate.edu/co_cag/rank_maps.html

But these numbers donโ€™t even include the early-November storm. Letโ€™s add the rain from that storm for some truly outlandish numbers in southwestern Colorado. The map below shows the total precipitation from September 1 through the morning of November 5. The San Juan mountains received over 20 inches of precipitation in that time period, and a couple locations in the San Juans near Wolf Creek Pass recorded over 30 inches. Several stations around Pagosa Springs observed over 20 inches of precipitation in this just-over-two-month period. This is a huge amount of precipitation for this area, especially at lower elevations and when itโ€™s not from big snowstorm cycles in the winter.

Total precipitation (inches) across Colorado since September 1 from gridded PRISM data along with CoCoRaHS and SNOTEL station observations.

How huge are those amounts? In Archuleta County (home to Pagosa Springs), we already saw that it was the wettest September-October period on record. When we add in the early November storm, it will be the wettest September-October-November period on record. But it wonโ€™t just be a record for those three months: it has been wetter than any previous three-month period, period. The map below shows that for parts of Archuleta County since September 1, itโ€™s been more than 6 inches wetter than any previous three-month period. In southern La Plata County and northern Rio Arriba County in New Mexico, itโ€™s also been easily the wettest 3-month period on record (with a few weeks yet to go in November). A few areas around the Four Corners even surpassed their average precipitation for an entire year, in just over two months.

Margin by which the precipitation from September 1 through November 4, 2026 exceeded the previous record for any three-month period back to 1895 in the PRISM precipitation dataset. The San Juan River is shown in blue.

Drought relief

The upside is that there has been drought relief, at the cost of the major flooding. Almost all of southern Colorado is now drought-free on the US Drought Monitor, a remarkable turnaround after the winter, spring, and summer we went through. Storage in Navajo Reservoir, on the San Juan River in northern New Mexico, went from nearly record-low in early September to above-normal in early November. McPhee Reservoir on the Dolores River saw a similar turnaround, as did Lemon and Vallecito Reservoirs in southwest Colorado. The story on the huge reservoirs downstream on the Colorado River (Lakes Powell and Mead) is more complex, however. The good news is that Lake Powell has come up more than 20 feet in the last month; the bad news is that itโ€™s still lower than it was at this time last year. Lake Mead has only seen a small increase in storage recently. So, despite some major drought relief in parts of the Colorado River basin (and again, at the great cost of destructive flooding), the impact on the broader water challenge with the Colorado River hasnโ€™t been that significant.

Time series of storage in Navajo Reservoir (in millions of acre-feet). Historical percentiles are shown by the color-shaded bands, and the current level is shown with the black line. From https://climate.colostate.edu/drought/#reservoirs

Where to help

The team at Pagosa Weather, which once again has been doing a phenomenal job of both weather/flood updates and recruiting CoCoRaHS observers to collect data in the area, put together an excellent list of resources if you want to support the communities in La Plata and Archuleta Counties that have been hit so hard in the last two months.

Monitoring U.S. Temperature and Precipitation in October 2026 — NOAA

Rainy weather and storm clouds near Vermillion Cliffs National Monument, Arizona. Courtesy of Canva.com

Click the link to read the article on the NOAA website:

November 9, 2026

Key Takeaways:

  • Warm October: The contiguous U.S. (CONUS) recorded its fourth-warmest October in the 132-year record.
  • Record nighttime warmth: For the fourth consecutive month (Julyโ€“October 2026), the CONUS average nighttime minimum temperature set a new monthly record (1895โ€“2026).
  • Southwest tied its fourth-wettest October: The Southwest climate region averaged 2.68 inches of precipitation, 233% of its average October total.
  • Hurricane Isaias makes landfall: Isaias became the latest first hurricane to form in the Atlantic basin during the satellite era (since 1966), making landfall near Destin, Florida, as a Category 2 hurricane and bringing strong winds and heavy rainfall across the Southeast.
  • Drought improvement: According to the U.S. Drought Monitor, CONUS drought coverage fell from 59% on September 29 to 44% on November 3, its lowest level since January 2026.
Map of the U.S. notable weather and climate events in October 2026.

Other Highlights:

Temperature

The average temperature for the CONUS in October was 58.7ยฐF, 4.6ยฐF above the 20th-century average, ranking as the fourth-warmest October in the 132-year record. October marked the 21st consecutive month (February 2025โ€“October 2026) with CONUS temperatures above the 20th-century average.

October 2026 U.S. Mean Temperature Percentiles Map.

Above-average temperatures spanned the entire CONUS during October, with all 48 states recording average temperatures above their 20th-century baselines. Thirty statesโ€”extending from Oregon to North Carolina and Texas to Minnesotaโ€”experienced much-above-average October temperatures.

Nighttime minimum temperatures were especially notable, averaging 46.3ยฐF, 4.9ยฐF above the 20th-century average, and surpassing the previous October record, set in 1947, by 0.1ยฐF. October marked the fourth consecutive month (Julyโ€“October 2026) in which CONUS average nighttime minimum temperatures set a new monthly record.

Alaskaโ€™s average temperature was 30.4ยฐF, 4.9ยฐF above the 1925โ€“2000 average, ranking in the warmest third of the 102-year record. While temperatures across southeastern Alaska and the Panhandle were near average, western portions of the state and the Aleutians experienced above- to much-above-average conditions.

Hawaiสปiโ€™s average temperature was 69.0ยฐF, 0.7ยฐF above the 1991โ€“2020 average, ranking in the warmest third of the 36-year record. While average daytime maximum temperatures were slightly below average, average nighttime minimum temperatures were 1.8ยฐF above average, tying the record for the warmest October minimum temperature in the 36-year record.

Precipitation

Total precipitation averaged across the CONUS in October was 2.35 inches, 0.19 inch above the 20th-century average, ranking in the middle third of the 132-year record.

October 2026 U.S. Total Precipitation Percentiles.

Much-above-average precipitation was widespread across southern California and much of the Southwest and Great Basin, extending into parts of the central and northern Rockies. Utah, Colorado, Arizona and Nevada each ranked among their 10 wettest Octobers on record. Portions of the central and southern Plains also experienced above-average precipitation, while rainfall associated with Hurricane Isaias contributed to above-average totals across parts of the Southeast. In contrast, northern California and the Pacific Northwest received below-average precipitation, along with portions of the northern Plains, Mississippi Valley, Midwest and Northeast.

Alaska’s average precipitation was 5.06 inches in October, 0.67 inch above the 1925โ€“2000 average, ranking in the wettest third of the 102-year record. Above-average precipitation occurred across portions of the Northwest, southern mainland and southeast Interior, while the Aleutians, western Alaska Peninsula and Panhandle received below-average precipitation.

Hawaiสปi received 8.65 inches of precipitation in October, 3.53 inches above the 1991โ€“2020 average, ranking as the third-wettest October in the 36-year record. Heavy rainfall associated with the southern passage of Hurricane Nolo contributed to the above-average totals. With statewide precipitation above average for the ninth consecutive month, year-to-date precipitation through October reached 95.31 inches, 46.23 inches above the 1991โ€“2020 average, marking the wettest Januaryโ€“October on record.

US Drought Monitor map November 3, 2026.

Drought

According to the November 3 U.S. Drought Monitor, about 44% of the CONUS was in drought, down about 15 percentage points from the end of September and the lowest CONUS drought coverage since January 27.

Drought persisted across much of the Pacific Northwest and Great Basin, parts of the central Rockies and northern Plains, the Upper Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, far Northeast and Puerto Rico. Drought expanded or increased in intensity across portions of the Lower and Middle Mississippi valleys and the Lower Ohio and Tennessee valleys. Drought conditions improved across much of the Southwest and southern Rockies, portions of the central and southern Plains and Southeast.

Monthly Outlook

Above-average temperatures are favored across much of the CONUS and Alaska during November, except for parts of the Southwest and southern Plains. The highest probabilities (exceeding 50%) are forecast across much of the northern tier. Above-average precipitation is favored across much of the West, Plains, South and Southeast, while below-average precipitation is favored across portions of the northern Rockies, Great Lakes and western Alaska. Visit the Climate Prediction Centerโ€™s Official 30-Day Forecasts for more details.

Drought is expected to persist across parts of the Northwest, northern Rockies and Plains, northern Great Lakes, the eastern Carolinas and far Northeast, while improvement is expected across parts of the Southwest and much of the southern Plains, Lower Mississippi and Tennessee valleys. Visit the U.S. Monthly Drought Outlook for more details.

Significant wildland fire potential for November is above normal across Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Visit the National Interagency Fire Centerโ€™s One-Month Wildland Fire Outlook for more details.


For more detailed climate information, check out our comprehensive October 2026 U.S. Climate Report scheduled for release on November 13, 2026. For additional information on the statistics provided here, visit the Climate at a Glance and National Maps webpages.

#Parker Water Pipeline — Floyd Ciruli (The Buzz) #SouthPlatteRiver

Platte Valley Water Partnership project overview. Credit: Parker Water

Click the link to read the article on The Buzz website (Floyd Ciruli):

November 9, 2026

In 2021, Ciruli Associates joined with Frank Jaeger, manager, and the engineers and lawyers with Park Water in a long series of trips to Sterling and Logan County to talk water and farming. Jaeger, an entrepreneurial water manager, needed some water rights for environmental requirements for permitting Rueter-Hess Reservoir in Douglas County. But he also saw the long-term benefit with building a relationship with the agricultural community along the Northern Colorado South Platte River. Parker Water built that trust by operating farms without โ€œbuy-and-dryโ€. They supported the community and were a part of the agricultural economy.

Ron Redd, current manager of Parker Water, and Joe Frank, manager of the Lower South Platte Water Conservancy District, built on the relationship to develop a $1.1 billion reservoir and pipeline project that will provide water to Parker, Castle Rock and storage for the northeast farm community. They just received a 2019 water right which will allow permitting and construction to begin as financing is established.

Water development in Colorado takes decades and requires patience. Moving water west toward the metro area is as hard as moving it east over the Continental Divide. Congratulations to Parker Water and the entire team.

Read article:
Pipeline to share water between Parker, Castle Rock and northeastern Colorado farms OKโ€™d in water court Colorado Sun, Oct 30, 2026

Related:
Protecting Coloradoโ€™s Water Jan 6, 2022

The South Platte River Basin is shaded in yellow. Source: Tom Cech, One World One Water Center, Metropolitan State University of Denver.

Coloradoโ€™s anemic water flows could have been worse if not for a vote 6 years ago — #Colorado Public Radio

The Colorado River in McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area, near Grand Junction, Colorado, on April 26, 2019. Photo by Mitch Tobin/The Water Desk

Click the link to read the article on the Colorado Public Radio website (Tom Hesse). Here’s an excerpt:

November 9, 2026

Western Colorado saw paltry water flows this summer, but in some parts of Western Colorado, that depressed runoff highlighted infrastructure improvements that are slowly making the region more resilient to drought.

โ€œWhen you really see the difference is in summers like this โ€” when we just have a little bit of water, and we have to be extremely intentional and efficient with it,โ€ Melissa Wills, a program manager with the Colorado River District, said. โ€œIf you are relying on 100-year-old infrastructure, it’s going to be a difficult summer.โ€

Wills manages the Community Funding Partnership, a program funded through a 2020 ballot question. That measure increased property taxes by almost $2 for every $100,000 in value to support water projects and passed with more than 70% support during the 2020 general election. In the five years the program has been funded, itโ€™s dolled out around $34 million in grant funds across Western Colorado, funding everything from canal improvements to studies researching alternative forage plants better suited to drier climates…Wills said most of the grants are meant to give local entities a leg up on applying for bigger-dollar prizes. An irrigation district may not stand out in the Bureau of Reclamation grant field, but an irrigation district with a $50,000 head start on their proposal is a different story…

In the Roaring Fork Valley, funds generated by the 2020 ballot measure contributed to a multi-agency effort to restore a part of the Crystal River that runs through Carbondaleโ€™s Riverfront Park. The restoration included removing invasive plants, stabilizing the riverbank and creating a low-flow channel for the river that served to improve fish habitat and flow to one of the townโ€™s major ditch diversions. Heather Lewin with the Roaring Fork Conservancy said the restored river saw better streamflows this year, despite the poor snowpack, compared to past low-water years. Notably, Lewin said, the improvements allow the city to avoid having to create temporary โ€œpush-upโ€ dams in low-water years when heavy equipment was needed to divert meager flows to keep water going where it needed to.

โ€œIn those low flow years, that cobble push-up dam spanned the whole reach of the river along with the damage that it did moving about a quarter mile upstream, instream, pushing cobbles in a stretch where you only had maybe an inch or two of water to begin with,โ€ Lewin said. โ€œThe instream benefits of not creating that additional stressor in a year when we’re dealing with low flows and high temperature already has a huge benefit to that reach as well.โ€

Water savings from the project are difficult to measure, but Lewin said the improvements in fish habitat and flows to the diversion ditch have been notable. Sheโ€™s hopeful the restoration effort can be replicated in other places.

Map of the Roaring Fork River drainage basin in western Colorado, USA. Made using USGS data. By Shannon1 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69290878

La Plata County estimates $7.5 million in flood damage to private properties: Federal government has yet to declare Southwest #Colorado a disaster area — The #Durango Herald #SanJuanRiver #AnimasRiver #JunctionCreek

Junction Creek in Durango on the morning of Nov. 2, 2026. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Durango Herald website (Tyler Brown). Here’s an excerpt:

November 10, 2026

La Plata County estimates about $7.5 million in flood damage to private properties based on 412 submissions to the countyโ€™s Crisis Track Disaster Survivor Portal. As of Monday, the county was still assessing damage to public infrastructure, including buildings, roads and bridges, and had not yet determined an estimated cost of repairs. County spokeswoman Emily Spencer said the county is awaiting a federal disaster declaration from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which would make federal assistance available to help residents affected by the flooding. Spencer said a federal disaster declaration would make two types of FEMA assistance available: public assistance and individual financial assistance.

โ€œPublic (assistance) is the infrastructure finance and funding that would go to governments to rebuild their roads,โ€ Spencer said…

Individual assistance would go directly to those whoโ€™s properties have been damaged by the flooding. La Plata County was not included in Coloradoโ€™s initial request for a federal major disaster declaration following last monthโ€™s flooding. Gov. Jared Polis initially requested the declaration for Archuleta and Rio Grande counties, where the state had identified nearly $27 million in damages eligible for federal public assistance. La Plata County officials are gathering information on damage to homes and public infrastructure, including roads, bridges and public buildings, and sharing those assessments with state officials for consideration. County-level damage assessments help Colorado officials evaluate the extent of the impact and provide information to the federal government as part of the request for a major disaster declaration.

Coloradans have approved Proposition 137, creating a $175 million pool for conservation and outdoor programs: Prop 137 is expected to reduce residentsโ€™ tax refunds by between $26 and $83 — Steamboat Pilot & Today

Pile burning at Colorado State Forest. Photo: Matt Schiltz, CSFS

Click the link to read the article on the Steamboat Pilot & Today website (Ryan Spencer). Here’s an excerpt:

November 9, 2026

Proposition 137 has passed, dedicating sales tax from outdoor goods to conservation and outdoors programs. The ballot measure passed by a slight margin, with about 52% of Coloradans voting in favor of the measure, according to unofficial results from the Colorado Secretary of Stateโ€™s Office as of Saturday evening. With about 98% of the vote counted, there were 1,347,245 โ€œyesโ€ votes to 1,249,749 โ€œnoโ€ votes. The Associated Press called the race on Friday…

โ€œIt was close,โ€ [Scott] Fitzwilliams added, โ€œbut that is the most critical thing that has passed in decades in the state. Itโ€™s going to provide a funding stream that is consistent โ€” it wonโ€™t always be the same based on where the (state) budget is โ€” that can be invested in fuels reduction, wildfire management, water protection, which is just so critical.โ€

Proposition 137 instructs the state government to direct a portion of taxpayer refunds collected from this sales tax to create a pool of about $175 million for conservation, wildfire risk mitigation projects โ€” such as slash pile burning and selective thinning โ€” and outdoor recreation programs. The ballot measure is expected to reduce Colorado Taxpayer Bill of Rights, or TABOR, refunds by between $26 and $83 for single filers, or double that for joint filers, in some years…The ballot measure would dedicate 47.5% of its funding to the Great Outdoors Colorado program, known as GOCO, which currently funds parks, trails and wildlife projects through lottery revenues; another 47.5% toward wildfire risk mitigation, forest management and watershed restoration projects; and the remaining 5% to outdoor recreation, economic development and equity programs. Prop 137 was supported by a coalition known as โ€œProtect Coloradoโ€™s Land and Water, Prevent Wildfires,โ€ and has received support from The Nature Conservancy, Denver Waterโ€™s board of water commissioners, local groups such as the Routt County Wildfire Mitigation Council, Eagle Valley Land Trust and SOS Outreach, as well as major political players in Colorado, including former Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, former U.S. Sen. Mark Udall and former Gov. Bill Ritter.

Exactly how much water is my crop using? — (USGS.gov)

Click the link to read the article on the USGS website:

October 20, 2026

Agriculture and the Landsat program have a long history together. The satellite Earth observations that began in 1972 provided a vital ability to monitor how crops were growing around the worldโ€”and whether shortages might be looming that would affect the food supply.


When later Landsat satellites carried thermal instruments to measure land surface temperatures, scientists gained an important tool for estimating how much water was being consumed by crops because evaporation and transpiration (plant โ€œsweatโ€), collectively known as evapotranspiration (ET), cool down an area.

Today, U.S. farmers and water managers rely on past and current Landsat data as the backbone of models that help them determine how much water the crops are using. This knowledge informs farmersโ€™ decisions about the efficient and wise use of water, along with their responses to reporting requirements.

With drought a recurring reality in some areas and water resources becoming increasingly scarce, improvements in water monitoring are crucial.

Yun Yang, an assistant professor at Cornell University, wants to help make the data even betterโ€”more accurate, detailed and timelyโ€”to help farmers with their water management decisions.

โ€œThis is a really interesting time and also a really urgent time because of increasing water stress,โ€ she said.

Yun Yang is a member of the Landsat Science Team. USGS photo.

A Plan to Improve Evapotranspiration Estimates

Yangโ€™s work involves trying to further enhance ET at the field level. She also serves as a consortium partner and member of the nonprofit board for Landsat-based OpenET, a platform that provides ET information by using six respected ET models to derive an ensemble model that is used throughout the United States.

In addition, ET is the focus of Yangโ€™s interest as a member of the new 2026-2030 Landsat Science Team, a group of federal, academic, international and industry scientists and engineers committed to supporting the scientific integrity, data quality and continuity of the Landsat mission.

Yang sees great potential in integrating data from other remote sensing sources with Landsat data to improve ET products.

As a first step for her work related to the Landsat Science Team, Yang and her colleague Zhuosen Wang want to enhance the estimation of Landsat albedo to use, for demonstration, as an input to ET model ALEXI/DisALEXI, one of the OpenET models. Albedo is a measure of how much incoming solar radiation is reflected by the Earthโ€™s surface. Bright reflective surfaces, such as snow and ice, typically have a high albedo, while darker surfaces, such as forests or dark soil, generally have lower albedo and absorb more solar radiation. Albedo helps determine how much energy is available at the surface for processes such as evapotranspiration.

Together, the Landsat 8 and 9 satellites revisit land and coastal surfaces around the globe every eight days. Adding Europeโ€™s similar Sentinel-2 optical satellite observations via the Harmonized Landsat Sentinel-2 (HLS) product would increase the number of albedo observations to several times a week, allowing changes in surface conditions to be captured more quickly.

As a next step, Yang would like to incorporate the enhanced albedo product into the ALEXI/DisALEXI model, replacing the simpler approach currently used by the model. The work could demonstrate whether more precise albedo information improves ET estimates and could potentially serve as a proving ground for other ET models.

In addition, Yang intends to refine her system that fuses Landsat thermal observations with those from other remote sensing instruments for more frequent observations at a resolution that reveals more detail.

Landsat 8 captured this image of center-pivot irrigated fields in southwestern Kansas on August 24, 2026. The town of Garden City is in the upper right quadrant portion of the image. Landsat satellites provide a key source of data for estimating evapotranspiration. Photo credit: USGS/LandSat

Focus on Farmers

Yang sees mutual benefits to serving with both OpenET and the Landsat Science Team. OpenET puts her in touch with data users, โ€œto really understand what they want and what they need and learn how we can better support them,โ€ and that provides valuable insight for the Landsat Science Team.

Ultimately, the ET efforts aim to give farmers a better idea of how much water their individual fields require. โ€œThey can use this ET information to help determine when to start irrigation, how much to irrigate and whether thereโ€™s any stress signal from their fields,โ€ Yang said.

While Yang believes other satellite data can help improve ET estimates, Landsatโ€™s unique combination of features still provides the core data.

โ€œLandsat is the gold standard for ET estimation,โ€ Yang said.

#Colorado #Climate Center: October 2026 Monthly Climate Summary

Click the link to read the summary on the Colorado Climate Center website (and to dive into the detail).

#Colorado Sports Betting Revenue Ticks Higher For September 2026 — TheLines.com

Click the link to read the article on The Lines website (Chris Altruda). Here’s an excerpt:

November 9, 2026

The Colorado Department of Revenue reportedย $47.7 millionย in gross sports betting revenue for September on Friday, with operators posting a small year-over-year gain. Winnings rose 3.8% from the previous year, while the 8.7% hold was nearly 1.2 percentage points higher. That jump helped offset a 10.2% decline in handle to $546.8 million, pushing year-to-date handle down 0.6% to $4.5 billion at close. The state levied taxes on $46.4 million in adjusted gross revenue, redirecting $4.7 million to its coffers. The elimination of promotional deductions for operators has notably affected receipts collected in the new fiscal year, with the first quarter’s $12.5 million up $2.8 million from the first three months of Fiscal Year 2025-26. Colorado also became the 13th state to surpass $2.5 billion in gross operator revenue in the post-PASPA era with September’s total.

New bill slashes tribesโ€™ role in projects that impact ancestral sites, water and wildlife: Native nations have come out against a Senate permitting reform bill, Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (BAAJA) — Anna V. Smith (High Country News)

Art inspired by three landscapes experiencing threats of mining: Mount Taylor, New Mexico, Fajada Butte, New Mexico and Devils Tower, Wyoming. Marty Two Bulls, Jr./High Country News

Click the link to read the article on the High Country News website (Anna V. Smith):

November 5, 2026

In 2024, a subsidiary of the mining company Energy Fuels revived its plans to open the Roca Honda Uranium Mine in New Mexico near Mount Taylor, a place of cultural significance to at least 30 Native nations. The company had received expedited permitting under the Trump administration last year, and in mid-September, the Forest Service announced that it would begin to analyze the mineโ€™s potential impacts under the National Environmental Policy Act, or NEPA.

That process includes tribal consultation, which is critical to upholding tribesโ€™ ability to protect cultural landscapes, wildlife and water, would change dramatically under the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, a permitting reform bill introduced by Western Republican and Democratic senators, including Sens. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., and Mike Lee, R-Utah. The Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources is expected to vote on it after Congress returns on Nov. 9.

The legislation is sweeping in its proposed changes, affecting core environmental laws well beyond NEPA, like the Endangered Species Act, Clean Water Act and National Historic Preservation Act. The permitting reform is meant to speed up industryโ€™ s ability to build mines, wind turbines, solar arrays, data centers, pipelines and more on federal lands. It has drawn fierce opposition from Native leaders and organizations, who argue that the increased speed comes at the cost of tribal sovereignty, and that they were not consulted before it was introduced.

Mt. Taylor and La Jara Mesa, where Laramide Resources is hoping to build a major uranium mine. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Mount Taylor in New Mexico and the greater Chaco landscape in Colorado, Arizona and Utah are among the many places that would be impacted by such legislation. โ€œMany of these places are outside our reservations. Federal law is how we have a voice when a mine, a pipeline or a transmission line is proposed that impacts our cultural resources, our sacred sites and our communities directly,โ€ said Acoma Pueblo Gov. Charles Riley at a national conference of tribal leaders in October. โ€œThis bill would take away most of that.โ€

If the legislation passes, a federal agency could choose not to consult with tribal nations about cultural sites at risk of being damaged by projects like the Roca Honda Mine โ€” a project that the Acoma Pueblo does not oppose, though the Navajo Nation and Isleta Pueblo do. General Counsel for the Acoma Pueblo, Aaron Sims, wrote in an email that the tribeโ€™s position comes as the result of a settlement, where the company made major concessions and changed the project. Timelines for reviewing complex documents would be shortened, and federal agencies would only be required to consider the impact of mining activities on federal land, even if a project covers both state and private lands, as the Roca Honda Mine does. In all, the legislation further distances tribes from federal decision-making on their ancestral lands and limits their options should a proposed project violate their rights.

โ€œThis is one of those extreme, existential threats thatโ€™s in front of us right now,โ€ said Mark Macarro (Pechanga), president of the National Congress of American Indians, at the organizationโ€™s conference. If senators donโ€™t make dramatic changes ahead of the November vote, Macarro said, โ€œthis bill needs to be killed.โ€

TRIBAL LEADERS AND ORGANIZATIONS ARE RAISING ALARM about proposed changes to Section 106 in the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), which currently requires federal agencies to consult with a tribe if a project could impact a cultural site. The proposed alterations are expansive: Tribal consultation would become optional and the scope of what would trigger it would narrow, while cultural sites would not need to be considered at all if they werenโ€™t formally identified before a review process commences.

The proposed changes are โ€œa direct assault on tribal sovereignty,โ€ said Ira Matt (Sรฉliลก), executive director for Indigenous Diplomacy and Federal Relations for the National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers. The organization, along with the National Congress of American Indians and others, has called for senators to remove the NHPA section from the bill entirely.

According to Matt, the legislation would restrict how tribes define and protect their cultural heritage and undermine their rights to participate in decisions that affect their histories and futures. โ€œIt also places wholly unqualified federal agencies in the position of making decisions about our sacred places while threatening to assume control over tribal preservation programs developed to reflect each tribal nationโ€™s unique knowledge and lifeways,โ€ Matt said โ€œThese are not simply changes to a permitting process. They are deliberate attempts to undermine tribal self-determination.โ€

The Section 106 process is currently โ€œone of the most powerful toolsโ€ tribes have to inform federal decision-making, said Wesley Furlong, a senior staff attorney at the Native American Rights Fund who specializes in Section 106 reviews. State and tribal staff go through hundreds of thousands of Section 106 reviews every year, and many of those conclude without any changes needing to be made to a project. At other times, the reviews give tribes a chance to tell federal agencies how a project could damage sacred sites and cultural landscapes, many which are not on any federal agencyโ€™s radar. Even then, however, a review doesnโ€™t ensure that a place will be protected, and tribes cannot expect a specific result.

Furlong said the portion of the proposed bill involving Section 106 is a โ€œtotal dumpster fire and an absolute hatchet jobโ€ that clearly did not involve anyone familiar with tribes or the existing consultation process. Native nations are being โ€œforced to take the brunt of this โ€˜compromise.โ€™ Itโ€™s permitting reform at the expense of Indian County, tribal rights, and tribal resources.โ€

The importance โ€” and inadequacy โ€” of Section 106 for tribal nations was on display during the permitting process for the 550-mile-long SunZia Southwest Transmission Project, which would funnel wind energy from New Mexico to California. In 2024, tribal nations sued over the lack of tribal consultation. Last year, courts agreed and ordered the Bureau of Land Management to re-do consultation for the project, enabling tribes to mitigate possible harm to cultural sites in the San Pedro Valley in Arizona, though most of the transmission line has already been built.

AS WRITTEN, TRIBAL ADVOCATES worry that the bill could also limit federal agenciesโ€™ consideration of Indigenous knowledge by changing the definitions of the information that agencies must consider under the Endangered Species Act. It also shortens comment timelines and limits tribesโ€™ ability to pursue NEPA violations through the courts, and it lessens federal agenciesโ€™ mandate to incorporate as much relevant scientific information in their decision-making as possible. This could have on-the-ground effects in places like New Mexico, since the Forest Service would not have to incorporate any research published after it began its environmental impact statement for the Roca Honda Mine.

Tribes often need to bring up their own data or information about the impacts of a project after federal analysis has begun, said Daniel Cordalis (Navajo Nation) a staff attorney at the Native American Rights Fund who focuses on tribal water rights. When Cordalis was working on the Klamath River, tribal nations had to challenge the federal data that governed the flow of water and affected salmonโ€™s survival. Across the Western U.S., tribes are experts in fisheries science, forestry and hydrology, and their data may well differ from the federal governmentโ€™s. โ€œTribes often have the best scientists doing a lot of this work,โ€ said Cordalis. But rather than acknowledge tribesโ€™ knowledge and scientific research, the bill includes no โ€œrecognition of the role of another sovereign government whose rights and resources may be at stake.โ€

Tribes often need to bring up their own data or information about the impacts of a project after federal analysis has begun, said Daniel Cordalis (Navajo Nation) a staff attorney at the Native American Rights Fund who focuses on tribal water rights. When Cordalis was working on the Klamath River, tribal nations had to challenge the federal data that governed the flow of water and affected salmonโ€™s survival. Across the Western U.S., tribes are experts in fisheries science, forestry and hydrology, and their data may well differ from the federal governmentโ€™s. โ€œTribes often have the best scientists doing a lot of this work,โ€ said Cordalis. But rather than acknowledge tribesโ€™ knowledge and scientific research, the bill includes no โ€œrecognition of the role of another sovereign government whose rights and resources may be at stake.โ€

These changes could mean that tribal nations are not adequately included or considered in large-scale federal projects. And under a provision in the legislation called โ€œproject certainty,โ€ it would be much harder for the federal government to change or revoke a permit once a mine, solar array or wind project has one. That is exactly what the Biden administration did to halt the Keystone XL pipeline in 2021, after it was permitted under the first Trump administration despite the objections of numerous Native nations. Similarly, the Trump administration has sought to stop Biden-era offshore wind projects.

U.S. Senator Martin Heinrich. Credit: https://www.heinrich.senate.gov/contact

As of early November, tribal leaders along with environmental, archaeological and community organizations were still seeking to make changes to the bill and encouraging people to contact their senators to voice their concerns before the Senate votes on Nov. 9.

In an emailed statement, a spokesperson for Sen. Heinrich said that the senator doesnโ€™t believe the bill as written hurts tribal consultation, and that the bill โ€œdefends against the Trump administrationโ€™s efforts to make all Tribal consultation discretionary and eliminate consultation altogether on cultural landscapes. All of this means stronger Tribal consultation protections, lower utility bills, more good-paying jobs, and a path toward unlocking our clean energy future.โ€

Tribal nations already have very few laws at their disposal to protect ancestral lands or culturally important wildlife, or water, and the proposed legislation chips away at all of them, Cordalis said. โ€œThe positive and the real good things that tribes have been able to protect over the years โ€” probably wouldnโ€™t be able to have been protected under this.โ€

Native land loss 1776 to 1930. Credit: Alvin Chang/Ranjani Chakraborty

Why did Andy Mueller drive to Rocky Ford?: Manager of Colorado River District agreed to talk to farmers and ranchers in lower #ArkansasRiver Valley. He had a reason — Allen Best (BigPivots.com) #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification

Crowley County 40 years after water transfers dried up farmland. Photo credit: LexNichols

Click the link to read the article on the Big Pivots website (Allen Best):

November 7, 2026

Rocky Ford has long been known for its cantaloupes, of course. Best in Colorado, and many places beyond.

Cantaloupe season is long past. So why was Andy Mueller willing to drive all the way from Glenwood Springs this week to speak at a water meeting in Rocky Ford?

The simple answer is that because Mueller, the general manager of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, was asked. The ask occurred last winter in the hallway of a conference center in Loveland where the Colorado Cattlemenโ€™s Association was meeting. Muellerโ€™s district includes much of Western Colorado which, other than the ski valleys, remains heavily agricultural.

Making the request was Jack Goble, who has an office in Rocky Ford, headquarters for the Lower Arkansas River Water Conservancy District. He was planning to stage the districtโ€™s first water summit, and he thought Mueller would be a valuable speaker, to lend perspective.

After all, they share a water source: the Colorado River.

Colorado has four water conservation districts, all of them created by state legislators. The Colorado River District was created in 1939 and encompasses 15 of the 20 Western Slope counties.

Southwestern Colorado also has a conservation district, as do the San Luis Valley and the Republic River Basin. They are charged with protecting and developing their water resources. In all cases, with diminishing river flows or, in the case of the Republican River Basin, declining groundwater levels, protecting is the operative word.

Conservancy districts, in contrast, can be formed by local communities, subject to approval of district courts. They are typically formed to build, finance, and operate local dams, reservoirs, and other water infrastructure. Colorado has more than 50 water conservancy districts, and sometimes there are several within the confines of a conservation district.

Cantaloupes gett harvested in lower Arkansas River Valley. Photo/LexNichols

The Lower Arkansas River Water Conservancy District was formed in 2002, a notorious drought year, but in response to what even then was a growing concern.

Since the 1970s, Front Range communities have looked covetously at the water flowing down the Arkansas River to be used for agriculture. Crowley County, located northeast of Pueblo, has become the poster child for buy-and-dry. See above photo.

The cities โ€” including Colorado Springs but also Aurora โ€” have found willing sellers from among the farmers. But taken together, the communities in the district worry about being left with only enough water to flow into Kansas as necessary to meet the compact obligations governing the Arkansas River. That would gut their already thin and struggling economies.

The inaugural Ark Valley meeting drew maybe 150 people, reported Goble, including farmers and ranchers up and down the valley but many from outside the district. State Sen. Cleave Simpson, the manager of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District (and Senate minority leader), was there from Alamosa, as were Jim Yahn and Joe Frank from Sterling.

In creating this water summit, said Goble, the intent was to โ€œhelp those in Lower Arkansas River Valley get engaged and informed on water issues, because it will determine our future, what happens with water.โ€

The Colorado River District holds similar meetings. The first was held in 2004 and attracted just a few dozen people. It now attracts about 300 to Grand Junction each September with dozens more watching remotely.

In Rocky Ford, Russ Schumacher, the state climatologist, spoke about the warming and mostly drying climate. Sean Cronin, manager of Boulder Countyโ€™s St. Vrain and Left Hand Water Conservancy District, also spoke.

A highlight was the unveiling of a new interactive website called โ€œWhen Water Leaves: The Story of a Buy-and-Dry in Coloradoโ€™s Lower Arkansas River.โ€ The website is part history lesson, part polemic. It tells the story of how communities took root in the 19th century, how canals were built, how farms were created.

It also tells about how more than 100,000 acres of historically irrigated farmland have dried up in the five-county area from Pueblo downstream to the Kansas border. Of those, 40,000 acres dried up due to water that now goes to Front Range cities.

The StoryMap identifies 40,000 additional irrigated acres at high risk of permanent dry-up. Models provided by The Freshwater Trust estimate $184 million in lost economic output.

โ€œOne community should not be sacrificed for the growth of another,โ€ said Goble in the press release that was issued concurrent with the meeting in Rocky Ford. โ€œColorado should not grow its cities by drying up the agricultural communities that feed them.โ€

The website is nifty. If you are at all curious about the Lower Arkansas River Valley, you will want to check it out.

The Arkansas River originates near Leadville. There, the flows of the river are augmented by several transmountain diversions, most of them small in quantity but two notably bigger. Largest is the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, a federal diversion launched in 1963 to divert 55,000 acre-feet annually (on average) from the Fryingpan River above Basalt. The somewhat older Twin Lakes project diverts 38,000 acre-feet from the Roaring Fork River headwaters above Aspen.

Water imported into the Arkansas River Basin is prized because it can be used without having to deliver return flows into the river. In other words, it can in turn be diverted out of the basin to Aurora, for example, which can then recycle the water. Colorado Springs, too, can recycle the water.

These diversions use Colorado River water, which is where Andy Mueller comes in. At his districtโ€™s annual meeting in Grand Junction, speaker after speaker has laid out the science of the warming climate.

Andy Mueller, general manager of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, has used the districtโ€™s annual forum in Grand Junction as a way to convey the need for planning for a time of less water. Photo credit: Brent Gardner-Smith/Aspen Journalism

Mueller himself said two years ago that those who depend upon the Colorado River need to start planning for the day that it delivers only 9 million acre-feet. During the 20th century, it delivered an average 15.2 million acre-feet. In this century, the annual average has been 12.5. In recent years, it has fallen further to 10 million acre-feet.

The question then becomes: where will cities get their water? The simple answer is from agriculture, which uses 75% of the water in the Colorado River.

After returning from Rocky Ford, Mueller told me that his Western Slope district has policies focused on protecting agriculture, especially within its 15-county district. โ€œBut identifying the threat to agriculture in our state is really important,โ€ he said.

The seven basin states have infamously come up short in agreeing how to address the reality of a river that is dramatically underdelivering what was assumed by the 1922 compact and the infrastructure subsequently built to deliver the water to farms, especially, but also cities.

Consider, for example, that two tunnels from the Colorado River headwaters (Roberts, from Dillon Reservoir, and Moffat, from Winter Park) deliver roughly half of Denver Waterโ€™s supply for its 1.5 million customers in Denver and suburbs). These diversions are junior to the 1922 compact.

If the disagreement between the seven basin states ends up before the Supreme Court, how will that court rule?

โ€œThere is a risk that the Supreme Court will disagree with us,โ€ explained Mueller. โ€œAnd because of that risk, I am concerned that water mangers throughout the state will need to go look for replacement water for their Colorado River Water.โ€

That gives the Glenwood Springs-based conservation district commonality with the farmers in the Lower Arkansas River as well as those in the Rio Grande Basin and the South Platte.

โ€œI donโ€™t want the lower Ark to be dried up, and I donโ€™t want the lower South Platte to be dried up, and I certainly donโ€™t want the Colorado Basin to be dried up,โ€ said Mueller.

โ€œI will also say this: The River District does its best work when it builds coalitions of like-minded partners, and I think the areas I just mentioned all have values very similar to the River District policies in terms of preserving agriculture. We are only impactful when we operate in coalitions.โ€

Mueller worries that the negotiations among the states will erupt into overt bitterness. โ€œIt will make the battle over the wolf reintroduction look like childโ€™s play,โ€ he said, referring to Coloradoโ€™s intra-state dispute.

Colorado Rivers. Credit: Geology.com

Mancos issues boil/bottle water advisory after flooding disrupts treatment plant: Water from the Mancos municipal system is not safe to drink following flooding — The #Cortez Journal

Mancos middle and high school students volunteered to help fill sandbags for community members in need of them following recent flooding. The town of Mancos was also required to issue a boil/bottle water advisory on Friday due to unsafe water in the municipal water system. (Courtesy of Town Hall of Mancos Facebook)

Click the link to read the article on The Cortez Journal website (Bailey Duran). Here’s an excerpt:

The town of Mancos issued a boil/bottle water advisory Friday for customers of its municipal water system after flooding forced the release of โ€œinadequately treatedโ€ water. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment required the advisory.

โ€œDue to ongoing impacts from the recent flooding, the town was required to allow inadequately treated water into the distribution system to maintain system pressure,โ€ the town said on its Facebook page.

The advisory will remain in effect until the health department determines the water is safe again and issues written authorization. All water in homes and businesses served by the town system is not considered safe and should only be used for flushing toilets until further notice. Residents on Mancos Rural Water or private wells are not affected.

How protection of public land shapes political strategies in the Americanย West

An aerial view of a rocky landscape showing layers of sediment, evidence of erosion and tall peaks.
Parts of the Grand Staircase National Monument were removed from federal protection under the Trump administration, opening the way for mining and drilling. David McNew/Getty Images

Erika Allen Wolters, Oregon State University and Monica Hubbard, Boise State University

Public lands are intricately woven into the fabric of America. Years of data confirms that a majority of Americans, regardless of their political beliefs, want public lands to remain in federal hands โ€“ though not everyone agrees on how exactly those lands should be managed. And while itโ€™s not clear that public lands were a crucial factor in the 2026 midterm election results, survey data suggests that it is an important issue in deciding whom to vote for.

Federal conservation efforts began in the late 1800s, with Yellowstone becoming the first national park in 1872. Today, 640 million acres, nearly 30% of the countryโ€™s land area, are administered by the federal government for a wide range of purposes, including conservation, forestry, grazing and energy production. These lands are held in trust by the federal government for the American people.

In our studies of the politics of the American West, where the vast majority of U.S. public lands are located, we are seeing efforts to make voters aware of candidatesโ€™ views on land protection and to use grassroots political tactics to influence management decisions.

People stand on a staircase holding signs promoting public land and wilderness.
In 2017, moves to privatize public land sparked major protests, including in the Montana State Capitol. William Campbell/Corbis via Getty Images

Land transfers

Protesting government efforts to turn turn public spaces into private property, or to allow development on public land, are key ways people show the value they place on public lands.

In 2017, at the start of Donald Trumpโ€™s first term as president, U.S. Rep. Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican, proposed that the federal government transfer land to individual states. The states, underfunded and understaffed to manage the land themselves, would likely have sold the land to private interests. The response created the #KeepItPublic social media campaign and mobilized conservation groups against the bill. Land Tawney, president of Backcountry Hunters and Anglers, said, โ€œOnce that bill was introduced, the hornetโ€™s nest was kicked.โ€ Chaffetz pulled the bill and left Congress five months later.

And in 2025, after Trump returned to the White House, U.S. Sen. Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, proposed that Congress require the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service to sell between 2.2 million to 3.3 million acres of public land in 11 Western states. He said the land sale would help โ€œaddress local housing needs.โ€

But conservation groups and other Western lawmakers, including fellow Republican U.S. Sen. Tim Sheehy and Republican U.S. Rep. Ryan Zinke, also of Montana, declared the proposal a โ€œthreat to the Montana way of lifeโ€ and forced Lee to withdraw the proposal.

Public land management

There isnโ€™t available evidence to suggest that voters choose members of Congress based solely on their views or action about the management of public lands.

But elected officials often swiftly distance themselves from or outright oppose efforts to modify or eliminate public land protections. That response signals they believe their land protection stances play a role in how the public views them.

For example, Trump administration efforts to reduce Bears Ears National Monument and to swap a parcel in Yosemite National Park with a private developer met with opposition from both parties in Congress.

However, that opposition is not always successful at preventing development or natural resource extraction on public lands. In March and April 2026, both houses of Congress passed a resolution supporting mining near the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness in Minnesota, despite public outcry about the potential pollution of a vast wilderness.

Two people paddle a canoe across water toward a rocky tree-lined shore.
Protests in support of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness have not stopped a nearby mining proposal. Anthony Souffle/The Minnesota Star Tribune via Getty Images

Public lands in election politics

In 2026, two new groups emerged to call attention to threats to public lands. Protect Wyoming and PAC for Public Lands in Idaho both formed specifically to compile and publicize elected officialsโ€™ public lands voting records, especially when those votes affect peopleโ€™s rights to hunt, fish and enjoy the outdoors.

These groups may be able to tap into core land protection values broadly shared by many voters across the political spectrum. That could put more direct and consistent pressure on politicians to protect public lands.

Political headwinds

The Trump administration has moved to limit people from mobilizing in support of public lands.

For instance, Trumpโ€™s Jan. 20, 2025, executive order declaring a โ€œnational energy emergencyโ€ has led the Department of the Interior to accelerate its review of proposals for oil and gas drilling, production and refining, and mining, along with other energy-related natural resource development.

A process that used to take one to two years has been reduced to no more than a month. That provides less time for people to review documents, understand what they say and decide how they feel about the proposals. However, 15 states are now suing the Trump administration, saying that fast-tracking violates federal law and seeking court orders to restore the previous process.

And in January 2026, the White House Council on Environmental Quality revised the rules around public comments on proposed federal land management actions. Government agencies are required under the National Environmental Policy Act to give the public a chance to comment on rule changes. It is the primary way the public can raise objections, question the thoroughness of the options, or to provide other evidence to help inform policy. The council significantly shortened, or in some cases eliminated, the time period during which the public may submit comments โ€“ though that decision has also been challenged in court, saying the Administrative Procedure Act requires the original amount of public comment.

A person stands next to an open area of land.
A data center proposal initially meant for private land near Boulder City, Nevada, was moved to nearby federal land in the face of public opposition. AP Photo/John Locher

Retaining the public trust

How the government handles data center development may shed further light on the political power of public lands. Back in July 2025, Trump issued an executive order seeking to โ€œutilize federally owned land and resources for the expeditious and orderly development of data centers.โ€

In fall 2026, media outlets and advocacy groups called attention to efforts to develop data centers on public lands, including at least 17 computing campuses in six states.

Nearly two-thirds of Americans oppose data centers being built in their communities. Some politicians have questioned the deals on federal land.

These centers were on the minds of voters in the midterm elections, nowhere more than in the Nevada gubernatorial race, where the Democratic challenger won on a platform to oppose projects on federal land. Voter discontent may not stop the Trump administration from moving forward, but it all but guarantees that data centers on public lands will be an issue in the 2028 general election. The degree to which the opposition gains political momentum could be another indicator of how the American public will act to continue to demand that public lands remain in public hands.

Erika Allen Wolters, Associate Professor of Political Science, Oregon State University and Monica Hubbard, Professor of Public Policy and Administration, Boise State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

South Platte River Basin #climate for the week ending November 9, 2026 #SouthPlatteRiver

Below is the Snow Water Equivalent in South Platte graph from the NRCS for November 9, 2026. Snowpack is 36% of the median (up 8% one week, wild swings this time of the accumulation season) and 4% of the median peak (up 2% one week). There are 168 days until the median peak. Iโ€™ve added the lines for 2026, 2018, 2012, and 2002 since drought in the South Platte River Basin is still very pronounced.

There is a gradient from south to north in the South Platte River Basin. Check out the graphs for the Upper South Platte (74% of the median) and the Cache la Poudre (12% of the median).

Below is the Precipitation Accumulation in South Platte graph from the NRCS for November 9, 2026. This morning precipitation, at the SNOTEL stations, is at 68% of the median (no change one week), and 7% of the water year median (up 1% one week), There are 326 days left in the water year. Iโ€™ve added the lines for 2026, 2018, 2012, and 2002 since drought in the South Platte River Basin is still very pronounced.

The gradient from south to north is even more pronounced in accumulated precipitation.

The forecast for the central and northern mountains is sunny and warm through Sunday. It will also be sunny and warm down here, about 101 miles from the Leadville Irish Miners Memorial. From The Conversation:

Local Irish and Irish American communities unveiled a significant public history space near Leadville, Colorado, in 2023. Roughly 600 people gathered to pay tribute to the Leadville Irish Minersโ€™ Memorial. The memorial is impressive and symbolic. A spiral walkway acts as a labyrinth that ushers visitors to statues of a kneeling miner holding a harp and a pickax, and a woman holding a baby The statues are surrounded by glass panels that feature the names and ages of the 1,339 people who were buried in the Catholic Free Section of Evergreenโ€™s pauper cemetery in the late 1800s. I am a political scientist and historian who has spent decades researching the history of Leadvilleโ€™s Irish immigrant community. The idea for this memorial grew out of my doctoral dissertation research conducted between 2001 to 2010. Based on surnames and archival church, cemetery and newspaper records, Iโ€™ve determined that as many as two-thirds of those buried in the pauper cemetery were Irish or Irish American โ€“ and half were babies and young children. Their deaths tell a hidden story of the toll that industrial labor took on immigrant communities…

The silver rush in Leadville led to a massive influx of immigrants. The cityโ€™s population exploded from a few hundred gold miners during the early 1870s to as many as 35,000 people during the mid-1880s, according to the Federal Census. The Irish became the largest ethnic group in the city and one of the largest in the American West. Upward of 5,000 Irish and Irish Americans lived in or near Leadville in the 1880s. Nearly two-thirds of Irish men in the 1880 Federal Censuswere miners. Leadville became an important Irish cultural space, attracting figures such as author Oscar Wilde and Michael Davitt, founder of the Irish Land League in 1879. The Land League was a transatlantic political movement, funded largely by Irish Americans, to reshape Irish land law and protect Irish tenants from exploitation by landlords. But for Irish immigrants and their families, Leadville was a death trap, claiming the lives of countless miners, women, children and infants. Irish workers responded by organizing and making demands through massive strikes.

This statue of a mother and baby โ€“ added in 2026 โ€“ sits on the edge of the Leadville memorial plinth. James Walsh photo CC-BY-ND
California Gulch back in the day

Hereโ€™s a look at the Colorado 7-Day precipitation map through November 8, 2026 from the High Plains Regional Climate Center. Precipitation in the South Platte Basin along the Continental Divide of the Americas ranged from 0.00โ€ to 1.00โ€ณ.

Hereโ€™s the Colorado 7-Day percent of normal precipitation map through November 8, 2026 from the High Plains Regional Climate Center. Precipitation in the South Platte River Basin along the Continental Divide of the Americas ranged from 0% to 800% of normal.

Hereโ€™s the most recent 7-Day Departure from Normal Temperature (F) for Colorado through November 8, 2026 from the High Plains Regional Climate Center.

Below is the 7-day Quantitative Precipitation Forecast for the week of November 2, 2026. No precipitation is anticipated for the mountains of the South Platte River Basin.

Below are the 8-14 day outlooks from the Climate Prediction Center, issued November 8, 2026, for temperature and precipitation, for the week starting November 16, 2026. The CPC expects above normal temperatures and above normal precipitation for the mountains of the South Platte River Basin.

Below is the Colorado Drought Monitor map from November 3, 2026. There was a one category degradation in Boulder County. Drought and abnormal dryness covers 57.81% of Colorado. The South Platte Basin is experiencing Abnormally Dry, Moderate, Severe, Extreme, and Exceptional drought conditions.

Below is the Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending November 3, 2026.

Hereโ€™s the US Drought Monitor Map from last week along with the one week U.S. change map.

Finally, various water providers in the South Platte River Basin import a significant volume of water from the Colorado River Basin. Climate Scientist Brad Udall spoke recently at a forum in Jefferson County that was sponsored by the Colorado Renewable Energy Society and New Energy Colorado. From Big Pivots:

Colorado State Universityโ€™s Brad Udall makes the case that the Colorado River Basin is the worldโ€™s first place where climate change is โ€œforcing a complete redo of water management.โ€ The climate change component of that statement seems unassailable. Flows in the Colorado River have declined 21% this century. A river that averaged 15.2 million acre-feet in flows during the 20thcentury has fallen to 12.2 million acre-feet in the 21st. It has further tapered off to 10 million acre-feet in the last few years. Temperature increases of 3.3 degrees Fahrenheit since 1970 explain much of that decline. A one-degree Fahrenheit rise in temperature results in 5% loss due to increased evaporation. โ€œHot drought,โ€ the phrase Udall favors, will only worsen, he says, as the process he and others call aridification will continue to worsen. Temperatures, said Udall at a recent forum, can continue to rise.

โ€œThe latest science tells us that the rate of warming has almost doubled. And the fossil fuel industry is showing no signs of exit or no signs of transformation to some other business model that doesnโ€™t involve polluting the Earth,โ€ he said.

Existing greenhouse gas emissions will, he added, continue to incrementally heat the Earth into the 22nd century even if humanity can reduce greenhouse gas emissions to zero. As for the water management redo, itโ€™s still early. Colorado River runoff has been in decline for the last quarter-century.

Colorado transmountain diversions via the State Engineer’s office

#Snowpack News November 8, 2026

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map November 7, 2026.
Colorado SNOTEL basin-filled map November 7, 2026.

From the Pagosa Springs Sun website:

As of the afternoon of Wednesday, Nov. 4, the Natural Resources Conservation Service SNOTEL snow measurement site on the summit of Wolf Creek Pass indicated that the pass had a total 7.4 inches of snow water equivalent, up from 4 inches last Wednesday, Oct. 28. Wolf Creek Ski Area reported a total of 12 inches of snow in the latest storm, bringing the yearly snow total to 39 inches so far.

Colorado Parks and Wildlife offices, properties impacted by severe flooding in southwest #Colorado #SanJuanRiver #AnimasRiver #JunctionCreek

The Animas River at Santa Rita Park on Nov. 2, 2026, when it was running at about 12,100 cfs. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the CPW release on the Pagosa Springs Sun website. Here’s an excerpt:

November 2, 2026

CPW staff are responding to the natural disaster in a multitude of ways across the San Luis Valley, at Navajo State Park and areas west of Wolf Creek Pass. CPW has also deployed its swiftwater rescue team to Archuleta County to assist with operations.

Navajo State Park

Staff at Navajo State Park have had a front-row seat to the devastation but have worked tirelessly both at the park and in surrounding communities while the San Juan River and Piedra River hit historic highs with as much as 45,000 cfs pouring into the reservoir. The reservoir has raised 51 feet since Sept. 18, an incredible amount for a 35-mile long reservoir with 15,600 surface acres. At this time, all Piedra River access at Navajo State Park is closed. The Sambrito Wetlands area is also temporarily closed. Access to the park is limited to Colo. 151 on the west side of the park in Arboles. Access on Colo. 151 from the north between Chimney Rock and Arboles is completely cut off. The visitor center at Navajo State Park will be indefinitely closed Mondays and Tuesdays. The boat ramp and aquatic nuisance species station are closed for the season. Several major road closures exist across southwest Colorado. For the latest highway closures, go to cotrip.org. Be advised that conditions continue to change rapidly. The latest road and trail conditions for the Rio Grande National Forest and San Juan National Forest can be found online. CPW continues to determine access to and condition of state wildlife area (SWA) properties. At this time, closures are in place of Devil Creek SWA, Higel SWA, Hot Creek SWA, Rio Grande SWA and Shriver-Wright SWA. Additional closures may be put in place as conditions warrant…

The Durango Fish Hatchery has experienced catastrophic flooding from the Animas River and Junction Creek. The Animas River reached 13,000 cubic feet per second mid-morning, the second-highest level ever recorded and highest since the flood of 1911. As of Nov. 2, hatchery staff was working around the clock to pump water away and position sandbags to protect the property and fish.

โ€œConditions are extremely dangerous,โ€ said CPW Area Wildlife Manager Rick Basagoitia of Monte Vista. โ€œEven in places where the Forest Service has been able to punch through and open some roads and develop workarounds, we strongly advise against traveling into these places. While many hunting areas will still be accessible, a large number of hunters will all be funneled into the same areas because of access routes being closed off in other areas. Hunters need to make the decision for themselves if they want to crowd into these open areas.โ€

CPW Water Quality Program Manager Melynda May reported multiple major spills or complete destruction of sewage treatment plants across southwest Colorado. As a result, much of the flood water is contaminated.

โ€œPlease avoid coming into contact with floodwaters as much as possible, keep any open wounds away from water, and wash any skin that comes into contact with floodwaters with soap and water as soon as possible,โ€ May said. โ€œAlcohol gels are better than nothing, but are not a substitute for soap and water.โ€

Map of the San Juan River, a tributary of the Colorado River, in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah, USA. Made using USGS National Map data. By Shannon1 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47456307

Travel is not advised to the San Juan National Forest: Severe flooding has damaged Forest roads and infrastructure, extent unknown — Lorena Williams (USFS) #SanJuanRiver

Credit: San Juan National Forest

Click the link to read the release on the USFS website:

November 2, 2026

Travel on San Juan National Forest System Roads is strongly discouraged and not advised due to life-threatening hazards. Record flooding across Southwest Colorado has left San Juan National Forest roads, trails, and other infrastructure inaccessible, severely damaged and, in many cases, unpassable. Highways across multiple counties are closed, and evacuation and shelter-in-place orders have been issued for multiple communities. Donโ€™t become a statisticโ€”rescue will not be readily available due to the current demand for search and rescue services.

โ€œPublic safety is our top priority, which is why we do not recommend travel on the San Juan National Forest at this time,โ€ said Forest Supervisor Steve Hattenback on Monday morning. โ€œWe will not begin to assess the extent of the damage until flood waters recede and our staff can begin to assess forest conditions. What we do know is that flood waters are extremely high, many roads and bridges are completely destroyed, and unsafe conditions persist on all three San Juan National Forest districts. We encourage the public to monitor the situation closely, and to postpone or cancel plans to visit the woods until conditions improve.โ€

Offices Closed: All offices are closed at this time:

  • Pagosa District Office (phones and internet also down)
  • Durango Forest Headquarters
  • Dolores District Office
  • Columbine District Office is closed Mon โ€“ Thurs, and is expected to be open for its regular office hours on Friday.

Additional Resources:

If you know of a forest visitor trapped down an unpassable road who needs evacuation help in:

  • Archuleta County, call 9-1-1 or the non-emergency dispatch line at 970-731-2160 when they are ready to be evacuated.
  • La Plata County, call 9-1-1 if an emergency, or non-emergency dispatch at 970-385-2900.

Please report abandoned property information if you are forced to leave vehicles behind by emailing the San Juan National Forest at: sm.fs.sanjuannf@usda.gov with the subject line of Personal Property. Please provide your name, phone number, license plates, description of property, and a detailed location, in addition to any other pertinent information.

For information on the San Juan National Forest, call (970) 247-4874, visit the forest website, or follow us on Facebook.

The Nature Conservancy, with Great Salt Lake Sentinel Landscape Partners, Receives $8.2 Million Federal Partnership Award to Launch First Agricultural Easement Program — Claire Cornell #GreatSaltLake

GILLMOR AUDUBON SANCTUARY This Audubon Sanctuary protects 3,597 acres of habitat on the south shore of the Great Salt Lake. ยฉ Evan Barrientos

Click the link to read the release on The Nature Conservancy website (Claire Cornell):

November 3, 2026

The Nature Conservancy (TNC) in Utah with other partners of the Great Salt Lake Sentinel Landscape announced today an award of $8.2 million in federal funding from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to launch the Great Salt Lake Agricultural Easement Program, the first effort of its kind in Utah. A win-win solution for agricultural producers and Great Salt Lake, the program seeks to sustain working farms, ensure that agricultural return flows reach Great Salt Lake, and strengthen economic and ecological resiliency across the Great Salt Lake watershed. Project partners are providing a required non-federal match of $8.6 million, for a total investment of $16.8 million in agricultural preservation, watershed health and community resilience.

Working with partners and producers, the program will identify farm-specific water conservation actions while supporting long-term production amid increasing pressure to convert agricultural lands. By focusing on lands with high conservation value, the program will help preserve vital wetland habitat created by agricultural return flows that support some 12 million migratory birds every year.

To implement this innovative program, TNC will collaborate with other Great Salt Lake Sentinel Landscape partners across the region. These partners include the Great Salt Lake Watershed Enhancement Trust, National Audubon Society, Ducks Unlimited, Bear River Land Conservancy, Utah Department of Agriculture and Food, Office of the Great Salt Lake Commissioner and Utah State University.

American avocet. Great Salt Lake is one of the Western Hemisphereโ€™s most important stopovers for migrating birds. ยฉ Mary Anne Karren

โ€œProtecting Great Salt Lake requires collaboration at an unprecedented scale, and this program is only possible because of the extraordinary commitment of many dedicated partners,โ€ said Danna Baxley, TNC’s water and agricultural strategy director in Utah. โ€œTogether, we have assembled one of the largest and most diverse partnerships focused on delivering water to the lake. This funding will allow us to pilot a new approach, learn from producers and continue working toward solutions that demonstrate how agriculture and Great Salt Lake can thrive together.โ€

The Great Salt Lake Sentinel Landscape focuses on enhancing military readiness and national security through nature-based solutions, such as safeguarding agricultural land around Utahโ€™s military installations to preserve critical open space buffers for testing and training. The Great Salt Lake Sentinel Landscape also supports securing water for Great Salt Lake to conserve vital wildlife habitat and mitigate hazardous dust events that threaten community health and disrupt military operations.

By pairing agricultural land protection with farm-specific water management, this pilot has the potential to become a model for other Western watersheds where agricultural production and water security align to provide significant benefits to lakes, rivers and wildlife as well as agricultural producers and local communities.

โ€œKeeping agricultural lands in production is essential to the long-term resilience of the landscapes we all depend on,โ€ said Travis Mote, Acting State Conservationist for the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. โ€œThis project is a demonstration of how the Regional Conservation Partnership Program promotes strategic partnerships to turn shared priorities into lasting conservation benefits for Utahโ€™s farm families and future generations.โ€

Sunset from the western shore of Antelope Island State Park, Great Salt Lake, Utah, United States.. Sunset viewed from White Rock Bay, on the western shore of Antelope Island. Carrington Island is visible in the distance. By Ccmdav – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2032320

The calculated soil moisture anomaly indicates much drier than normal soil in much of the Eastern U.S. and Pacific Northwest. The soil is much wetter than normal in the Southwest, eastern #Nebraska, #Iowa and #Florida — Denise Gutzmer www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/Soi…

Extreme flooding in the Southwest foreshadows a wild #ElNiรฑo winter — Matt Simon (Grist.org) #ENSO

A view of San Juan River flooding in downtown Pagosa Springs on Friday, October 23, 2026. (Photo courtesy of Jacque Aragon)

Click the link to read the article on the Grist website (Matt Simon):

November 5, 2026

The Southwest just got way too much of a good thing. Last weekend, a ferocious storm inundated communities and killed at least four people. Though precipitation is an essential component of Arizonaโ€™s desert climate, the state got two or three monthsโ€™ worth of it in just a few days โ€” far more than human infrastructure could handle all at once. Since September 20, an astonishing 28.84 inches of rain has fallen on Clovis, New Mexico, compared to its historical average of just 3.3 inches.

โ€œThis weekend was just adding more on the rough times that those communities in Southwest Colorado and Arizona and Utah and New Mexico have been having recently,โ€ said Russ Schumacher, director of the Colorado Climate Center at Colorado State University, whoโ€™s also the state climatologist. โ€œI think the El Niรฑo connection is pretty clear.โ€

Indeed, that band of warm water in the Pacific could be priming much of the southern United States for a winter of increased precipitation, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationโ€™s seasonal outlook. โ€œCould an event like this have happened in a non-El Niรฑo year?โ€ asked Michael A. Crimmins, a climatologist at the University of Arizona. โ€œIt could have, but it would have been a lot harder to pull all of the ingredients together at the same time, and would have been a lot less likely.โ€

โ€œSlightly favorsโ€ means a 33โ€“50 percent chance of the favored category, and โ€œfavorsโ€ means 50 percent or more. Hawaiสปi is shaded from CPCโ€™s Hawaiian Islands outlook. Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands are unshaded; NOAAโ€™s outlook suggests warmer temperatures in this region but publishes no corresponding probability. Source: NOAA Climate Prediction Center
Clayton Aldern / Grist

The looming problem this winter is heat, oddly enough. The unfolding El Niรฑo is already the strongest on record, and it could get stronger still in the next few months. Although that amounts to just a handful of extra degrees in the Pacific, it injects a tremendous amount of energy into the atmosphere, scrambling weather the world over. The phenomenon is so influential, in fact, that it has helped cancel hurricanes over in the Atlantic, by messing with winds high up in the atmosphere. Accordingly, this year shattered the recordfor the latest first hurricane in a season by nearly a month. Normally by this time of year weโ€™d have seen six of these cyclones, but 2026 has still only produced one.

The Southwest, though, gets no such relief from inclement weather. In addition to adding heat to the sky, the warmer waters of El Niรฑo also increase atmospheric moisture. Even beyond the El Niรฑo, temperatures in the Pacific have been running extra hot, which explains why the western part of the ocean has produced 10 hurricanes this season even as the Atlantic has remained quiet. (Overall, more than 90 percent of the excess heat that humans have pumped into the atmosphere has been absorbed by the oceans.)

All this warm water means more moisture for the weather patterns that have been moving into the Southwest over the last month. A separate system in late October, for instance, became one of the most extreme storms in Coloradoโ€™s history, pelting higher elevations with up to 8 inches of rain in four days, causing widespread destruction. โ€œItโ€™s just really extreme amounts of water vapor in the atmosphere that have been aimed into the Southwest in each of those storms,โ€ Schumacher said.

This autumn precipitation primed Arizona, Colorado, and other Southwestern states for yet more destruction this past week. For one, rivers were already running high, then ran all the higher. And two, if soils are soaked, a follow-up bout of rain will run off and cause flooding. โ€œWe get the second storm, just a little bit after the first one, then everything was primed for even worse flooding this time around,โ€ Schumacher said.

Shaded relief map of the US via Learner.org

In mountainous terrain, this gets especially dangerous, as the topography funnels rainwater into raging torrents. โ€œIf you hike around the Southwest, youโ€™re going to see out-of-place boulders all over the place,โ€ Crimmins said. โ€œWater put it there. Maybe it was 5,000 years ago or something like that, but water moves. We can have really epic flash flooding.โ€

The one silver lining here is that any increased precipitation from this El Niรฑo could bring drought relief to much of the southern U.S., according to NOAAโ€™s projections. Climate change is not only exacerbating these ongoing dry spells โ€” hotter temperatures also increase evaporation from reservoirs. At the same time, populations are growing in the Southwest, meaning more people demanding more water.

Source: NOAA Climate Prediction Center U.S. Seasonal Drought Outlook, Clayton Aldern / Grist

With these factors conspiring, the Colorado Riverโ€™s two largest reservoirs, Lake Powell and Lake Mead, are approaching the point of collapse. The potential for more rainfall this winter might help fill them, Schumacher said, but it canโ€™t reverse the systemโ€™s precipitous decline. โ€œItโ€™s a long way to go to get even back to where we were a year ago,โ€ he said. โ€œLet alone when it was in good condition decades ago.โ€

The wildcard this year is snowpack: Itโ€™s still too early to tell, Schumacher said, how much snow will fall in Colorado. Whereas rainwater flows quickly into rivers, making it harder to store without overwhelming infrastructure โ€” hence all the destructive flooding of late โ€” snowpack slowly releases water as things thaw in the spring. With a record low snowpack earlier this year, Colorado is in desperate need of bountiful flakes in the months ahead.

Water agencies canโ€™t change the weather, but they can at least change how they manage precipitation. Down in Arizona, cities like Tucson have been installing green infrastructure โ€” basically dirt spaces that hydrate native plants โ€” which slow down the flow of water, thus preventing flooding. โ€œThereโ€™s really cool and clever ways of thinking about stormwater as a resource,โ€ Crimmins said, โ€œrather than a nuisance.โ€

Guided by resident input, the award-winning 39th Avenue Greenway project at the edge of Denverโ€™s RiverNorth neighborhood is an example of One Water in action. The project restored a discontinued rail corridor to improve the aesthetic, create an accessible recreational amenity, and provide stormwater conveyance and filtration as well as 100-year flood protection for the area. (Blake Gordon, Courtesy DHM Design)

2026 Election Roundup: Voters approve water measures amid Democratic Party rout, ballot measures target water infrastructure funding and policy — Brett Walton (circleofblue.org)

Kaleb Danndels directs an excavator as it pushes a pipe segment into a hole drilled through the clay. He watches to make sure the existing 6-inch diameter water main he is standing above is not damaged. The existing water main will be abandoned after the new 8-inch water main is installed. The excavator on the left pushes the pipe into the small tunnel, while the excavator on the right holds the pipe steady. Photo ยฉ J. Carl Ganter / Circle of Blue

Click the link to read the article on the Circle of Blue website (Brett Walton):

November 4, 2026

Control of Congress headlined a historic 2026 midterm election.

Democrats took power in the House and Senate, tallying victory after victory to repaint the electoral map in broad swaths of blue. Those victories included triumphs in the Senate and governor races in Iowa where water pollution from industrial agriculture and the stateโ€™s rising cancer rate were prominent campaign issues.

Down the ballot, voters in state and local elections were asked to approve new spending on water infrastructure or changes in water policy.

Voters, as they typically do, supported public funding for water infrastructure.

In Arkansas, voters endorsed a measure to authorize the state Natural Resources Commission to issue $500 million in general obligation bonds to finance water and wastewater systems, pollution reduction, flood control, and irrigation. The measure passed with 56 percent support after being put on the ballot by the Republican-controlled Legislature.

In Louisiana, voters approved an amendment to the state Constitution that will allow public funds to be spent on removing the part of a lead service line that rests on private property. Advocates say that the change will unlock federal funding for lead pipe replacement and speed the process of eliminating lead from drinking water in homes and businesses.

The ability of local governments to raise revenue via property taxes was at stake in Florida. Voters, by a margin of 62 to 38, approved a constitutional amendment to limit the taxable portion of a propertyโ€™s value.

The change, championed by state Republican lawmakers, will cut local government property tax revenue by roughly $5 billion in 2027-28, according to a Florida House of Representatives budget analysis. An expected $8.8 billion reduction will come in 2028-29.

Some of that property tax revenue funds local water districts. Opponents argued that the amendment represents a โ€œcost shiftโ€ โ€“ local governments will have to raise money by other means, or cut services.

Local water funding was also on the ballot in a Texas city that was recently on the brink of a water-supply emergency. Voters in Corpus Christi overwhelmingly passed a citizen-led measure to institute mandatory drought surcharges on industrial water users.

Proposition B, which passed with more than 68 percent of the vote, cancels a voluntary program that was expected to generate $6 million this year. The target of the surcharges is the Coastal Bend regionโ€™s industrial corridor โ€“ the chemical processing facilities and oil refineries whose past water payments are already the source of legal action. Corpus Christi is seeking new water sources to accommodate its industrial growth after the cityโ€™s main reservoirs nearly dried up earlier this year.

Lastly, in California voters seem likely to reject a measure to establish a new environmental review for โ€œessential projectsโ€ like certain water, clean energy, transportation, and housing developments. The new California Environmental Quality Act process would have firmer deadlines for these projects and more restrictions on legal challenges.

With ballots still being counted, 54 percent of voters have said โ€˜Noโ€™ to Proposition 45.

What Birds Reveal About Fire, Forests, and Resilience: Research from Colorado shows how thoughtful forest management can support bird habitat — Abby Burk (Audubon.org/Rockies)

The Cache la Poudre River runs through an area burned by the 2020 Cameron Peak Fire. Photo: Evan Barrientos/Audubon

Click the link to read the article on the Audubon website (Abby Burk):

October 20, 2026

In the 2025 State of the Birds report, a status assessment of the health of the nationโ€™s bird populations, more than 50% of western forest species are declining due to habitat degradation from fire suppression and industrial timber management. The report emphasizes that conservation efforts can succeed when adequately supported by science-based planning and collaborative investment.

Scientific research shows that prescribed fire, managed wildfire, and carefully designed thinning can help restore forest resilience in appropriate settings. But forest restoration and wildfire mitigation aren’t interchangeable.

Restoration focuses on ecological health, including habitat, soils, and regeneration, while mitigation primarily reduces risks to communities and infrastructure. Together, these approaches can support healthier forests while helping protect nearby communities from destructive fires.

For birds, that distinction matters.

A 2020 Colorado Front Range study found that forest restoration treatments can benefit bird communities, although individual species respond differently. Some birds favor more open conditions, while others depend on mature forests, shrubs, or standing dead trees.

Audubon Rockies and Weminuche Audubon Society have monitored bird responses to dry mixed conifer forest treatments near Pagosa Springs for eight years. Their monitoring helps document how birds respond to forest treatments that create openings and encourage understory vegetation, providing habitat and food resources during the breeding season. This monitoring also helps inform forest management with the San Juan National Forest.

Research following the 2018 416 Fire near Durango offers another important perspective. Five years after the fire, researchers found similar overall bird species richness across burn conditions, but differences in which species were present. Standing dead trees in heavily burned areas provided valuable nesting and foraging habitat.

The lesson? Fire has ecological benefits, even as severe wildfires can pose serious risks. Healthy bird communities depend on a mosaic of habitat types and natural processesโ€”not simply the number of trees on the landscape. Managing these landscapes thoughtfully can also help safeguard homes, support outdoor recreation, and protect the natural places Coloradans value.

When forests burn, rivers feel it

Colorado’s mountain forests collect the snow that feeds our rivers, supports agriculture and communities, and sustains wetlands and riparian habitats essential to birds.

Severe wildfire can disrupt those connections. When intense rainfall follows a fire, ash, sediment, and debris can wash into streams and reservoirs, affecting water quality, aquatic ecosystems, and drinking-water infrastructure. Changes to vegetation and soils can also alter runoff and increase flooding.

A 2023 study in Science Advances highlights how wildfire risks cascade through water quality, water quantity, and infrastructure, sometimes for years after a fire.

Wildfire impacts extend downstream. Severe wildfire can affect water quality, water quantity, and water infrastructure through interconnected processes, with consequences for watersheds, communities, and wildlife like birds. Photo: Belongia et al. (2023), Science Advances, โ€œBuilding water resilience in the face of cascading wildfire risks.

Forest management may also influence snowpack. A recent University of Washington and The Nature Conservancy study found that carefully designed thinning increased snow storage by approximately 30% on north-facing slopes and 16% on south-facing slopes in Washington’s eastern Cascades. While results vary by landscape and greater snow storage doesn’t necessarily translate into increased streamflow, the findings underscore the importance of considering forest management within larger watershed systems.

For Audubon, forest health and watershed health are inseparable. How we manage forests affects the rivers, wetlands, and floodplains downstream that sustain wildlife like birds while providing clean water, recreational opportunities, and other essential benefits for communities.

Investing in resilience before disaster strikes

Research increasingly demonstrates the potential benefits of proactive wildfire management.

A 2026 study published in Science examined 285 wildfires across 11 western states. Researchers estimated that fuel treatments helped avoid approximately $2.8 billion in damages, including property losses and impacts associated with carbon emissions and smoke. The study estimated $3.73 in benefits for every dollar invested.

These are modeled benefits, not guaranteed outcomes for individual projects. But they reinforce the value of investing in carefully designed, science-based approaches before severe wildfire occurs.

Additional Resources

The following resources offer additional information on forest management, wildfire resilience, water resources, and habitat for wildlife like birds.

2025 State of the Birds Report

North American Bird Conservation Initiative U.S. Committee (2025). The State of the Birds, United States of America, 2025. https://www.stateofthebirds.org/2025/

Colorado Bird Research

Latif et al. (2020). Dry conifer forest restoration benefits Colorado Front Range avian communities. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2142

Scott & Korb (2024). Birds of the Burn: Avian Community and Functional Guild Variation Five Years Post-Fire in Warmโ€“Dry Mixed Conifer, Southwest Colorado. Fire. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire7030062

Weminuche Audubon Society, Audubon Rockies, and partners (2023).Effects of Prescribed Fire and Shrub-layer Mastication on Bird Communities in Ponderosa Pine Forests. https://sanjuanheadwaters.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/2023-BMP-Report-FINAL.pdf

Colorado Front Range bird habitat modeling study (2022). Simulated treatment effects on bird communities inform landscape-scale dry conifer forest management. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9285579/

Forest Management, Snowpack, and Watershed Science

Prichard et al. (2021). Adapting western North American forests to climate change and wildfires: 10 common questions. Ecological Applications. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2433

Lumbrazo et al. (2026). Can we maximize snow storage through fire-resilient forest treatments? Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/forests-and-global-change/articles/10.3389/ffgc.2025.1707812/full

University of Washington (2026). Research summary on forest thinning, snowpack, and wildfire resilience. https://www.washington.edu/news/2026/03/03/forest-thinning-snowpack-snow-drought-wildfire-resilience/

Belongia et al. (2023). Building water resilience in the face of cascading wildfire risks. Science Advances. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10881079/

Colorado State University. Fast-moving wildfires leave forests less able to recover. https://warnercnr.source.colostate.edu/fast-moving-wildfires-leave-forests-less-able-to-recover/

High Country News. Does thinning work for wildfire prevention? https://www.hcn.org/articles/wildfire-does-thinning-work-for-wildfire-prevention/

The Nature Conservancy. Western Dry Forests and Fire. https://www.nature.org/en-us/about-us/where-we-work/united-states/western-dry-forest-and-fire/western-dry-forests-fires-stories/

Science (2026). Wildfire damages and the cost-effective role of forest fuel treatments. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea6463

Inside Climate News (2026). Reporting on the economic and carbon benefits of wildfire fuel treatments. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/20052026/wildfire-management-prevents-carbon-emissions-and-billions-in-damages/

Great Blue Heron. Photo: Michael Rodock/Audubon Photography Awards.

The 2026 Deluge: Aftermath; Day of the Dead Flood moves into third biggest on record on the #AnimasRiver in #Durango — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org) #SanJuanRiver

The Animas River at Oxbow Park in north Durango on Nov. 2. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

November 4, 2026

Oh, Water, you give and take away. Following one of the driest years on record, the water once again came pouring out of the sky and raging through the streams and rivers, setting new high-water records, bringing new life to the parched earth, and wreaking havoc and destruction wherever waterways and humanity intersected.

The rains stopped two days ago, but streams in southwestern Colorado continue to run at levels that would have been considered abnormally high a month ago. North of Durango, a tree careening down Hermosa Creek got wedged underneath the railroad bridge, creating a dam of sorts and forcing the muddy waters to jump the bank and run through a trailer park and neighborhoods, forcing more evacuations and closing Highway 550. Several other Durango area roads remain closed due to washouts or debris.

Junction Creek in Durango on the morning of Nov. 2, 2026. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Other roads remain closed throughout the region. Highway 160 between Bayfield and Pagosa is shut down because the Piedra River โ€” which exceeded 17,000 cfs yet again โ€” washed out the highway bridge. Hwy 151 from Chimney Rock to Arboles remains closed after being wrecked by the previous flood. Hwy 160 over Wolf Creek Pass is shut, as is Hwy 17 over Cumbres Pass between Chama and Antonito. These closures have basically marooned Pagosa, which suffered serious damage during this round of flooding.

In Utah, State Road 162 north of Montezuma Creek remains closed โ€” this is one of the stretches of road that was totally overhauled over the last couple of years. And Hwy 163 between Mexican Hat and Bluff is shut down after Comb Wash took a big bite out of the highway bridge.

Meanwhile, hundreds of affected residents are just beginning the long ordeal of cleaning up and attempting to cope with this disaster.

Having lived through a flood that filled my home with nine feet of water, I can imagine what these people have gone through, and the difficult journey they face ahead of them. Itโ€™s heartbreaking to consider, and pains me even to write it down, yet it seems necessary. (Itโ€™s equally heartening to see the communities come together to rescue and support those most affected).

After the sheer panic that hits when you realize the water is rising in your front yard; the adrenalin that sets in as you try to gather up loved ones, pets, important documents, and the phone and the laptop and wade through thigh-deep water in the yard; the elation that follows your escape and survival, comes the devastation of returning to your home, walking inside, and seeing furniture and appliances and books and possessions strewn about as if a mischievous god had picked up the house and shook it. If your home is still there, that is.

Every surface that was under water will be blanketed with fine, dense, tenacious mud. It will coat clothing. In many cases the mud itself will be tainted with sewage or other waste, and as the waters subside, a fecund odor infuses everything. Particle wood rots, drywall deteriorates, hardwoods warp, mold grows. When the mud dries it becomes quasi-sandstone that can be near impossible to remove; break it up and it turns to fine dust that is hazardous to inhale. For months or even years after the cleanup and renovations are done, people who were flooded will find the mud embedded in items or clothing.

Floods donโ€™t discriminate, and are as likely to damage multi-million dollar homes as they are to inundate trailer parks. But the financial burden of recovery and cleanup weighs far heavier on low- and even middle-income folks. Many standard homeowners insurance policies do not include flood insurance, and your average homeowner or renter is likely to forego supplemental flood coverage because itโ€™s very expensive, especially for homes in historic floodplains or near waterways.

Iโ€™d like to believe this was an anomaly, something we can look back on as a sort of freak occurrence that, eventually, will be so unusual that it will feel as if it were unreal, something that became exaggerated by the passing of time. The 1911 Flood feels that way to me sometimes. How is it possible that the Animas River carried nearly twice the flows we saw on Nov. 2? Surely that could never happen again. Right?

And yet, we know this was not an anomaly because the early November deluge was the fifth abnormally high precipitation event of the previous six weeks, which was capped off by two record-breaking, catastrophic flooding events. On the one hand this is historic, unprecedented, a once-in-a-century event; on the other hand it could become nearly routine in our rapidly changing climate.

Either way, if my experience is any indication, one thing is almost certain: The people affected by these floods will feel a tinge of anxiety every time the weather forecast calls for heavy rain.

The Animas River at Santa Rita Park on Nov. 2, 2026, when it was running at about 12,100 cfs. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

The second flood of 2026 (and water year 2027) was the third largest on record at the USGS streamflow gage on the Animas River in Durango, with a peak flow of 13,000 cubic feet per second. That puts it ahead of both 1949 and 1970, but still well behind both 1911 (water year 1912) and 1927.

โ€ Peak flow on Nov. 2, 2026. โ€ โ€ Peak flow on Oct. 23, 2026. This is listed as 2027 because it occurred during the 2027 Water Year, which goes from Oct. 1, 2026, to Sept. 30, 2027.

Itโ€™s interesting to see how the Animas Riverโ€™s streamflows change over the course of the 45 miles or so between the Durango gage and the Farmington one. On Nov. 2, the Animas appears to have gained about 6,900 cfs over that stretch of river, while on Oct. 23 it only gained 800 cfs. A lot of this came from the two major tributaries โ€” Lightner Creek and the Florida River โ€” joining the Animas downstream from the Durango gage, along with numerous washes and arroyos adding their load.

Meanwhile, back in 1970 the peak streamflow in Farmington was 700 cfs lower than it was in Durango. Iโ€™m not sure how to explain that one.

Hereโ€™s some video and commentary I made at Santa Rita Park in Durango when the river was around 12,100 cfs. It would still gain another 900 cfs before peaking later that day: https://www.landdesk.org/p/live-with-jonathan-p-thompson

Election update: Clean water wins big in key ballot measures, recent clean water ballot measure victories show how communities are investing in healthier rivers, safer drinking water, and stronger protections — Sinjin Eberle (AmericanRivers.org)

Vinica Brook watershed, Massachusetts | ยฉ 2022 Jerry and Marcy Monkman/EcoPhotographyVinica

Click the link to read the article on the American Rivers website (Sinjin Eberle):

November 4, 2026

The midterm election showed that voters are clamoring for practical solutions to their communitiesโ€™ problems. So, while some of the results were a surprise, it is no surprise that voters approved nearly a billion dollars for clean water and healthy rivers on election day, demonstrating once again that water is a powerful unifying value with strong bipartisan support.

Action for water has taken on new urgency in recent years, as pollution threatens drinking water sources, infrastructure is crumbling nationwide, and communities are at risk of weather extremes from flooding to water scarcity.

Where water policy won on the ballot

This November, the American Rivers Action Fund supported five ballot measures to advance solutions at the local and state level:

Buffalo River, Arkansas | Angela Peace

In Arkansas, voters across the state approved Issue 4, authorizing a $500 million bond to provide critical funding to upgrade or build new clean water infrastructure for communities and agriculture. Other supporters of the measure include the Arkansas Farm Bureau, Arkansas Water and Wastewater Managers Association, Agricultural Council of Arkansas, and The Nature Conservancy, among many others.

In Massachusetts, the Action Fund supported the statewide Yes on 6 campaign to redirect an existing tax on sporting goods into conservation programs and projects, including those working for clean, safe, reliable drinking water, floodplain and river restoration, and open space. We partnered with Massachusetts Audubon, The Nature Conservancy, and Trust for Public Lands among a wide array of local conservation and land trust organizations to support this measure.

The American Rivers Action Fund also supported two county measures where water was on the ballot. In Dubuque County, Iowa, voters strongly approved a measure to provide $18 million for floodplain restoration, agricultural clean water projects, and riverside open space along the Mississippi River. We worked with the Iowa Natural Heritage Foundation, numerous land trusts, and Dubuque County to promote this important initiative in a rural county. And in Delaware County, Pennsylvaniathe Action Fund supported partners including Natural Lands, Trust for Public Lands, and others in passing an initiative to provide a $120 million dollar bonding authority to protect the water, natural areas, and wildlife across a county with increasingly urgent development pressure.

Upper Colorado River, Colorado | Russ Schnitzer

Similarly in Colorado, the Action Fund supported Proposition 137, which also will redirect a previously established tax on sporting goods into conservation purposes, including healthy rivers, wildfire prevention, and wildfire-ready watersheds. This measure will provide around $175 million per year for substantial investments across the state. Other supporters included The Nature Conservancy, Western Resource Advocates, Trust for Public Lands, and many others.

What recent clean water ballot wins tell us about the future

This latest round of successes builds on recent momentum. In July, Texas voters approved Proposition 4, with a record $20B for water over the next 20 years โ€“ the largest statewide ballot initiative to be passed in the country โ€“ was led by the National Wildlife Federation, Environmental Defense Fund, and others. And this past August, voters in Missouri overwhelmingly approved a measure to renew the stateโ€™s constitutional fund for state parks, agricultural water conservation programs, and healthy rivers and floodplains. The measure was backed by financial and communications support by the American Rivers Action Fund and won with over 82% approval statewide. Partners included the Missouri Farm Bureau, Trust for Public Lands, hunting and sporting groups, and land trusts and State Parks organizations across the state.

โ€œFamilies feel the consequences when their water isnโ€™t safe and their rivers arenโ€™t healthy,โ€ said Heather Taylor-Miesle, Executive Director of the American Rivers Action Fund. โ€œThey feel it in their pocketbooks, they worry about the safety of the water their kids are drinking, and theyโ€™re tired of mucking out their basements when it floods. These latest ballot wins prove that voters want real action. Nationwide, weโ€™re seeing a growing wave of momentum across the political spectrum demanding clean water and healthy rivers. When water is on the ballot, water wins.โ€

Created by Imgur user Fejetlenfej , a geographer and GIS analyst with a โ€˜lifelong passion for beautiful maps.โ€™ It highlights the massive expanse of river basins across the country โ€“ in particular, those which feed the Mississippi River, in pink.

Relentless rain, stubborn saturation: Historic flooding hits the Four Corners region once again — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org) #SanJuanRiver #AnimasRiver

A slough in the west Animas Valley north of Durango. The wetlands pictured here have been mostly drylands in recent years, but filled up and saturated surrounding ground during the previous high water in late October. Now itโ€™s rising again as torrential rains pound the region. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

November 1, 2026

โ›ˆ๏ธ WACKY WEATHER WATCHโšก๏ธ

Itโ€™s Sunday afternoon, the first day of November, and if tomorrow is the Day of the Dead, today is the Day of the Deluge here where I sit, a couple miles north of Durango. A hard rain has fallen relentlessly for the past 15 hours or so, only occasionally easing up for a few minutes at a time. An hour ago, the La Plata County Sheriff sent out an alert closing all county roads due to flooding conditions. While the segment of county road Iโ€™m on remains passable, numerous other roads have shut down themselves as debris flows bring mud, silt, and high water onto the roadways.

In need of provisions, and with a journalistic desire to see what the hell was happening out there, a friend and I ventured out to find waterfalls spilling off of Animas Mountain onto the highway into town, bringing rocks and silt with them. The liquor store, abiding by the shelter-in-place order, was just closing up for the day as we arrived.

Reports poured in about flooding around town: Highway 160 just east of town had turned to a river after Lightner Creek apparently jumped its banks; Junction Creek also was flooding, affecting some homes and forcing evacuations. To the south, San Juan County, New Mexicoโ€™s Office of Emergency Management urged all residents within a half mile of the San Juan, Animas, and La Plata rivers to head to higher ground. As the text alerts reached phones, and the serious of the situation became apparent, the roads emptied out.

So far, the flooding is mostly limited to arroyos and smaller waterways, but the major rivers continue to rise. Parts of Pagosa Springs and surrounding areas along the San Juan River are under a mandatory evacuation order as I write this, and the river is forecast to crest around 19.71 feet, or about four feet higher than the Oct. 23 peak (9,100 cubic feet per second). If it reaches that point, it will not only cause catastrophic damage, but would also be larger than the 1911 flood, making it the largest on record, by far.

Even if the river levels donโ€™t meet or exceed those of October 1911, this autumnโ€™s deluges are still historic. Autumn storms and floods are not uncommon in this area. But to have a succession of storms this big, dumping this much moisture, and bringing multiple rivers and streams to record or near-record levels over just a few weeks, is very unusual and possibly unprecedented, at least over the last 130 years or so. Itโ€™s also extraordinarily challenging for those who live in the path of these rivers, arroyos, and streams โ€” people who are only beginning to muck out the sewage-tainted silt from the last flood a week ago.

Also somewhat freakish is the timing: Flooding on Nov. 1 is odd because typically the moisture would be falling as snow by this time of year, which would keep the moisture on the ground rather than in the streams. Yet as of Sunday afternoon, it was still coming down as rain and Schneeregen up to about 11,000 feet in elevation, melting existing snow and leading to big streamflows in high country creeks and rivers. The snow-line is expected to drop considerably later tonight, snarling travel while also creating a nice base for the snowpack. If it comes soon enough, it may even keep some of that moisture out of the streams โ€” at least until next spring, when itโ€™s needed.

In the meantime, we sit and wait and watch nervously to see what the rivers will do.

Some notable streamflow data from around the region, as of Nov. 1 at about 5 p.m. (keeping in mind this is all provisional, real-time data):

  • McElmo Creek near the Colorado-Utah state line hit 1,610 cfs at 2:45 pm on Nov. 1, which is about 30 cfs higher than the Oct. 22 high mark.
  • The Piedra River near Arboles was at 16,800 cfs at 8 p.m. on Nov. 1, just 200 cfs short of its peak during last weekโ€™s floods (when the gage was knocked out of commission).

  • The San Juan River at Pagosa Springs was at 11,000 cfs at 7 p.m. โ€” 2,000 cfs higher than last weekโ€™s flood โ€” and still rising. The gage height is on track to exceed 1911โ€™s, though itโ€™s not yet clear that the streamflow will beat 1911โ€™s 25,000 cfs. Either way, it will be devastating.
  • The Animas River at the gage in Durango was at 4,790 cfs and still rising at 4:30 p.m. At the same time, the gage just downstream (below the confluence with Lightner Creek) 7,010 cfs, indicating that Lightner Creek was somewhere around 1,200 cfs (thereโ€™s no gage on that stream).

Thatโ€™s nothing compared to what was going on further south and west โ€ฆ

  • Oak Creek near Cornville, Arizona, jumped from 165 cfs to over 27,000 cfs in a matter of hours on Nov. 1.
  • The Salt River just upstream from Roosevelt Reservoir was at 107,000 cfs and rising at 5 p.m. on Nov. 1. Thatโ€™s an insanely huge amount of water. Itโ€™s also the third highest flow on record in over a century.

  • The Agua Fria River near Rock Springs, Arizona, was virtually dry a few weeks ago. Today, it reached 22,900 cfs.
  • The Verde River below Tangle Creek in central Arizona was at 89,000 cfs at 6:14 p.m. on Nov. 1.

Thatโ€™s it for now. Iโ€™ll be trying to put this all into context if and when the waters subside โ€ฆ

#Drought news November 5, 2026: Widespread precipitation (0.5 to 2 inches, locally more) resulted in 1-category improvements to the western third of #Colorado along with parts of the Northern to Central Great Plains

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

The very wet fall continued across the southwest quarter of the contiguous U.S. to end October. Based on the additional heavy precipitation (more than 1 inch) from October 27-November 2 and a positive shift in the long-term metrics since September, a broad 1-category improvement was made to the Southwest and Great Basin. Although short-term drought has ended, lingering long-term drought remains designated for parts of these areas. The remnants of Hurricane Vance from the East Pacific brought drought-improving precipitation to western and central Texas. At the start of November, heavy precipitation prompted improvements to the Great Plains and Upper Mississippi Valley. Drought coverage continued its late summer and fall decline across Florida. Drought expanded and intensified for parts of the Lower to Middle Mississippi Valley, Ohio Valley, Mid-Atlantic, and New England. Alaska and Hawaii remain drought-free, while drought continues to improve across Puerto Rico…

High Plains

Widespread precipitation (0.5 to 2 inches, locally more) resulted in 1-category improvements to the western third Colorado along with parts of the Northern to Central Great Plains. Recent precipitation and the โ€œconvergence of evidenceโ€ supported discontinuing the D3 in most of the Nebraska Panhandle…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending November 3, 2026.

West

A low pressure system at an unusually low latitude for this time of year resulted in anomalously wet conditions across southern California and the Desert Southwest over Halloween weekend. During the past 60 days, precipitation has averaged well above normal (200 to 400%, or more) across southern California, southern Nevada, and most of Arizona and Utah. This fall wetness is related in part to the El Nino driven active tropical cyclone season in the East Pacific. Precipitation amounts of more than one inch prompted a 1-category improvement from Arizona north to Nevada, Utah and southeastern Idaho. Please note that short-term drought has ended for the Southwest and Great Basin. Despite multiple short-term metrics on the wet side, long-term drought of varying intensity persists across parts of these areas. Precipitation (0.5 to 1 inch, locally more) this past week led to small improvements for parts of Montana. Drought coverage and intensity remained steady for the Pacific Northwest and much of California…

South

The remnants of Hurricane Vance in the East Pacific brought heavy rainfall to western and central Texas. A 1-category improvement was made roughly to areas that received more than 1 to 1.5 inches of rainfall. Also, SPIs at various time scales were considered. The unusually wet fall continued in New Mexico where a broad 1-category improvement was necessary. Additional improvements may be needed in subsequent weeks to be more consistent with long-term metrics. Please note that short-term drought has ended for New Mexico. Near or more than one inch of precipitation supported improvements across the western third of Oklahoma. Since this precipitation occurred on November 2nd, additional improvements may be made to a greater coverage of Oklahoma next week once a full assessment of the latest metrics is completed. The D2, D3, and D4 coverage across Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Tennessee is generally consistent with SPEIs at various time scales and soil moisture indicators. Impact reports from Mississippi include poor to very poor pastures along with dry farm ponds. The lack of precipitation the past two months (60-day deficits of more than 4 inches) coupled with above-normal temperatures (+6 to 10 degrees F since early September) has led to rapid intensifying drought across the Lower Mississippi Valley. Heavy precipitation (1.5 to 2 inches, locally more) resulted in a 1-category improvement to southwestern Tennessee and northern Mississippi, while a 1-category degradation was warranted for northeastern Tennessee…

Looking Ahead

A much drier multi-day period (Nov 5-9) and more typical for fall is forecast for a majority of the lower 48 states. A cold front will trigger a period of wet weather along the East Coast with the heaviest amounts (more than one inch) from the coastal Mid-Atlantic north to southeastern New England. Along the tail end of this front, heavy precipitation may occur across the Lower Rio Grande Valley. The only other area forecast to receive significant precipitation is the coastal Pacific Northwest.

By mid-November, there is an increasing chance that an atmospheric river affects the West Coast. The NWS 6-10 day outlook (valid Nov 10-14) depicts more than a 60 percent chance of above-normal precipitation for much of California and the Pacific Northwest. The largest probabilities (> 70%) are forecast across northern California and southwestern Oregon. Above-normal precipitation is also favored across the Great Basin, Southwest, Rio Grande Valley, and Florida. Below-normal precipitation is more likely across the Northern to Central Great Plains, Midwest, and Northeast. The enhanced Pacific flow strongly favors above-normal temperatures for nearly all of the contiguous U.S. which is typical for a strong El Nino during the fall.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending November 3, 2026.

Just for grins here’s a slideshow of early November US Drought Monitor maps for the past few years.

How this #ColoradoRiver disaster can be averted: Brad Udall remains hopeful a settlement will be negotiated but warns that huge changes will be needed in response to #ClimateChange — Allen Best (BigPivots.com) #COriver #aridification

Brad Udall. Photo credit: Allen Best/Big Pivots

Click the link to read the article on the Big Pivots website (Allen Best):

November 3, 2026

Brad Udall remains hopeful a settlement will be negotiated but warns that huge changes will be needed in response to climate change. Might prior appropriation be one of them?

Colorado State Universityโ€™s Brad Udall makes the case that the Colorado River Basin is the worldโ€™s first place where climate change is โ€œforcing a complete redo of water management.โ€

The climate change component of that statement seems unassailable. Flows in the Colorado River have declined 21% this century. A river that averaged 15.2 million acre-feet in flows during the 20thcentury has fallen to 12.2 million acre-feet in the 21st. It has further tapered off to 10 million acre-feet in the last few years.

Temperature increases of 3.3 degrees Fahrenheit since 1970 explain much of that decline. A one- degree Fahrenheit rise in temperature results in 5% loss due to increased evaporation. โ€œHot drought,โ€ the phrase Udall favors, will only worsen, he says, as the process he and others call aridification will continue to worsen. Temperatures, said Udall at a recent forum, can continue to rise.

โ€œThe latest science tells us that the rate of warming has almost doubled. And the fossil fuel industry is showing no signs of exit or no signs of transformation to some other business model that doesnโ€™t involve polluting the Earth,โ€ he said.

Existing greenhouse gas emissions will, he added, continue to incrementally heat the Earth into the 22nd century even if humanity can reduce greenhouse gas emissions to zero.

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2025. Note the tiny points on the annual data so that you can flyspeck the individual years. Credit: Brad Udall

As for the water management redo, itโ€™s still early. Colorado River runoff has been in decline for the last quarter-century. California and Arizona, the two lower-basin states with great thirst, were able to live off water banked in the two giant reservoirs, Mead and Powell, for many of those years. Only as the storage has ratcheted down to dangerously low levels have meaningful reductions in use begun, some only temporary in nature but others permanent.

The two states plus Nevada last year used about 6.8 million acre-feet from the river, less than the 7.5 million apportioned them the Colorado River Compact of 1922 and far less than the 8.5 million acre-feet they had averaged for several decades.

Upper-basin states had also been allotted 7.5 million acre-feet by the 1922 compact, but they have never come close to using that much water. Lacking the certainty of large upstream reservoirs, they have used about 4.5 million acre-feet.

Big cuts ahead

But big changes necessarily lie ahead, certainly for the lower-basin states but also Colorado and the other upper-basin states, Udall said in in a recent 90-minute plus presentation called โ€œDancing with Deadpool: a 27-Year-Long Colorado River Crisis.โ€ The forum in Jefferson County was sponsored by the Colorado Renewable Energy Society and New Energy Colorado.

โ€œWe gotta get rid of those old agreements,โ€ said Udall, the senior water and climate research scientist/scholar at Colorado Water Center.

โ€œWe in the Upper Basin must share this risk and not increase our use. The Lower Basin needs to plan on bigger cuts, more than 3 million acre-feet,โ€ he said, citing a paper he co-authored called โ€œWhat will it take to stabilize the Colorado River?โ€ that was published in 2022 in Science. In addition, he wrote a related paper along with New Mexicoโ€™s John Fleck that iin 2021 was published in Science.

โ€œAg has to bear the brunt of the cuts, because theyโ€™re 75% of the use, but M and I have to help,โ€ he said, referring to agriculture, municipal and industrial.

Strong disagreements exist between the two basins, upper and lower, beyond a general agreement to cut 1.2 million acre-feet in use. โ€œThe lower Basin really wants the Upper Basin to share, maybe on the order of 200,000 acre-feet a year, maybe 5%. And the Upper Basin says no way, and until recently has said weโ€™re going to even increase our use. โ€œ

Native America in the Colorado River Basin. Credit: USBR

Amidst all this, the claims of the 30 or so tribes in the basin need to be resolved. A 1907 Supreme Court ruling found that when the U.S. government ordered Native Americans onto reservations that it guaranteed them the water necessary to be farmers. They control about 25% of the water with some claims, importantly those of the Navajo Nation, still in question. โ€œTribal water is a really big deal,โ€ said Udall.

And Arizona, he said, with two-thirds of tribes, has a disproportionate burden of figuring out how to satisfy rights of the tribes while making everything else work reasonably well, too.

Arizona, he emphasized, is โ€œcentral to the problem and central to the solution.โ€ The Central Arizona Project will necessarily get less water, but it will not be zero, he added.

As for the unprecedented low river flows โ€” and unprecedented high temperatures โ€” of the 2025-26 water year, he predicted โ€œit wonโ€™t be the last time we see this. When it comes back, itโ€™ll be worse.โ€

As Udall spoke those words, it was raining hard in Coloradoโ€™s San Juan Mountains, water that helped raise the water levels of Lake Powell by about 15 feet going into November compared to a mid-September low. Still, Powell was little more than 25% full. The Colorado River problems go far deeper than can be solved by even an extraordinary storm cycle.

โ€œTrue,โ€ said Kathryn Sorensen, director of research at Arizona State Universityโ€™s Kyle Center for Water Research, responding to a New York Times story posted today,  โ€œbut theyโ€™ve helped pull us from the brink at Lake Powell, doubling or perhaps tripling the amount of realistically accessible storage there.โ€

Prior appropriation

Many analyists have concluded that the doctrine of prior appropriation, the legal structure for determining who gets how much water and when, must be modified. It is commonly called first in time, first in right.

The lower basin has roughly 100 diversions, nearly all very large and many of them administered through use of federal infrastructure. There, this principle is less important than in the upper basin, which has thousands and thousands of diversions, many small. Even so, it is the basic principle that allows California a bigger ladle for the Colorado River than Arizona. Arizona got in line as a result of federal legislation in 1968, the Colorado River Basin Project Act.

That law stipulated that water for the Central Arizona Project would be subordinate to Californiaโ€™s 4.4 million acre-foot annual allocation in case of  shortage.

Prior appropriation โ€œdoesnโ€™t really fit with the 21st century,โ€ said Udall. He described it as a โ€œwinner take allโ€ legal system developed in the 18th century by the farmers and miners who were the first colonists of Colorado and other parts of the West.

โ€œYou know, first in time makes first in right,โ€ he explained. โ€œAnd I argue all the time that 4-year-olds around the globe discover this rule every day. โ€˜Itโ€™s mine. I was here first.โ€™ And most parents step in and say, โ€˜No, no, you need to share that.โ€™ Thatโ€™s the system we have. And some people now own vastly expensive water rights because of this, and weโ€™re not going to overturn it.โ€

The doctrine did, he conceded, make sense in the 20th century. โ€œIf you were a junior water right holder, you could actually develop resilience and firm that water right by building storage, so that in really big years youโ€™d capture some water. And then, in the low years, when you werenโ€™t entitled to any water, youโ€™d use your storage to make up that deficient. Well, in a climate change world, that strategy now becomes next to impossible to deal with. Because we donโ€™t have these big years to fill up your reservoirs.โ€

The doctrine is โ€œembedded in how the Colorado River works, including the Central Arizona Project and its junior status to California,โ€ he continued. โ€œAgricultural rights are generally senior to cities, and โ€ฆ this creates problems because you end up potentially with a situation where Denver could get called out by agricultural water rights on the West Slopeโ€ of Colorado, especially those ag rights with appropriation dates prior to the Colorado River Compact.

โ€œIโ€™ve been arguing that we canโ€™t have 1,500 farmers depriving 20 million people in California and 7 million in Arizona and 2 million in Nevada and 2 million in Colorado with these senior rights,โ€ he said.

In 2010, working with Jonathan Overpeck, a researcher then affiliated with the University of Arizona (and now Michigan), Udall had begun to warn of dry times ahead. In a paper published in 2017 by Water Resources Research called โ€œThe twenty-first century Colorado River hot drought and implications for the future,โ€ they predicted 20% losses in river flows by mid-century and 35% by end of century. Those, they said, were conservative estimates.

The backstory is that for nearly a century the Colorado River Basin states โ€” importantly abetted by the federal treasury โ€” had created the infrastructure that assumed far more water even than what optimistically was assumed by the Colorado River Compact of 1922.

Deep family history

Udall brings to the Colorado River discussion perspectives informed by his unusual circumstances.

โ€œIโ€™m a great -great grandson of John D. Lee, the founder of Leeโ€™s Ferry,โ€ Brad at his presentation on Oct. 22. โ€œYou might think thatโ€™s kind of special. Turns out Lee had 21 wives, and thereโ€™s a chance he had 800,000 descendants, which might in fact be part of the problem right now.โ€

A long-time resident of Colorado, Brad grew up in Arizona, the son of Morris Udall, who represented Arizona in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1961 to 1991. His uncle Stewart Udall had represented the same district before becoming the secretary of Interior in the Kennedy and Johnson administrations from 1961 to 1969.

In other words, Udallโ€™s relatives were involved in creating at least some of the agreement infrastructure that now looks ill-advised. That includes the Central Arizona Project, which delivers Colorado River water via a system of canals and pipes that pumps water up 3,000 feet in elevation and across 336 miles to Phoenix, Tucson and farms between. Even then, during the debate in the 1960s, Mo Udall and other supporters realized the Colorado River would not have sufficient water. They were betting that water could be imported, such as from the Snake River in Wyomingโ€™s Jackson Hole. That never flew.

Alex Hager, formerly a reporter in Colorado for Greeley-based KUNC, probed the history in a story for KZJJ in Arizona title โ€œArizonaโ€™s lifeline to the Colorado River is drying up. Were warnings from history ignored?โ€

โ€œI think Stewart and Mo sort of blew it on some of this,โ€ Brad told Hager. But he also counseled some compassion. They had grown up on a farm in Arizona during the Great Depression. By the time they came to power after World War II, an era of booming national optimism may have colored their political thinking.

โ€œThe 1968 idea was we could build our way out of anything,โ€ Brad said. โ€œWe could engineer our way out of every crisis. Weโ€™re smart. Weโ€™re rich. The worldโ€™s our oyster.โ€

Udall gives many slide shows, each building on the last one. The best of them need at least an hour to deliver, because the story is that complicated. This was the third presentation by Udall heard this year by this writer. Unlike some others, though, this audience consisted of people most attentive to the energy transition. To his credit, Udall was able to craft his presentation in a way that did not require vast knowledge of the arcane world of water. He did this without sacrificing details.

Udall sees himself as a truth-teller with an unpleasant message. โ€œAs a scientist, I kind of feel like itโ€™s my job to tell people how it is. And if I can tell it with a little humor and a smile on my face, even if itโ€™s a tough message, maybe theyโ€™ll hear that message,โ€ he said.

The truth he sought to share was the need for great changes in how this declining source of water is shared by 40 million people โ€” changes necessary very, very soon. Those changes will likely include Colorado and other headwaters states, probably an agreement to conservation measures that reduce use by 2% to 5%.

Important, he said, will be better accounting of volumes of use in the upper-basin states. Lacking hard numbers, itโ€™s hard to judge equities. The counter argument has been that Colorado, in particular, has so many small users that this accounting poses an extremely difficult challenge.

What also must be noted is that Udallโ€™s critique inevitably is easier to deliver than setting out a precise outline of what this new future must entail. That, of course, likely would have required another hour or more.

โ€œI still think weโ€™ll get a negotiated solution,โ€ he said as he wrapped up his presentation. But then he added an asterisk, referencing the lawsuit filed by first Nevada in August, then joined by Arizona in October, challenging the federal governmentโ€™s order for cuts in water use. โ€œAlthough every day these lawsuits continue I get more depressed,โ€ he added.

After Udallโ€™s presentation, in the cafeteria where munchies were delivered, I heard one listener who suggested that Phil Weiser, when governor, might consider making Udall the representative of Colorado on the Upper Colorado River Commission. That is not a rap against Becky Mitchell, the current representative, who by all accounts has represented Colorado well in the difficult discussions. It is, though, an interesting idea.

You can watch/listen to Udallโ€™s presentation (and see his slides).
In late October, 100 people turned out at the Unitarian Church between Wheat Ridge and Golden to hear Brad Udall share his thought and knowledge about the Colorado River.

Following are a few more highlights:

Fuzziness of 1922 compact

The 1922 compact has several fuzzy components, most troubling being what was meant in Article 3D, the non-depletion clause, which says the upper basin states โ€œwill not causeโ€ the flows at Lee Ferry to drop below 75 million acre-feet across every rolling 10-year average.

โ€œIn the 20th century, there was only one way for that number to fall below 75 million. acre-feet, and that was if the basin used the water. But in the 21st century, we have a second way for those flows to fall below 75 million acre-feet, which is climate change, of course, and no one knows what this (delivery obligation) means,โ€ said Udall.

Too, the compact โ€œtotally excluded tribal water rights, despite a critically important Supreme Court decree in 1908 (Winters Doctrine), saying that tribes were entitled to water.โ€

As for the abundance of annual flows in the river, โ€œThey actually thought in 1922 that they were going to come back in 1962 and allocate a whole bunch of water because they hadnโ€™t allocated all of it.โ€

On deadpan

โ€œThere would be real harm if we hit deadpool. I mean, there would be a lot of people hurt. You hit Deadpool, you turn control of these reservoirs over to Mother Nature, away from us, and thatโ€™s a fundamental mistake.โ€

Getting into the mess

โ€œWeโ€™ve made a whole bunch of mistakes through time,โ€ he said. โ€œWe allocated water permanently. We assumed too much water. And there are a whole bunch of unrealistic policies. We now have a solution in sight for the next two years, but it will not be enough. And litigation (Nevada and now Arizona suing the federal government) just announced clouds what might really happen.โ€

Musical chairs

While the compact apportioned 7.5 million acre-feet to the upper basins states, they have never used more than 5.5 million acre-feet and mostly have stuck to around 4.5 million ace-feet.

โ€œThey feel like theyโ€™re still entitled to it, but itโ€™s also a little bit of a game of musical chairs, right? I mean, the music stopped here, and because you never grew into that, itโ€™s really hard to figure out how you possibly can use more given the facts on the ground., Weโ€™re sitting on a 2 million acre-feet per year imbalance.โ€

An acre-foot

An acre-foot is 325,000 gallons of water, enough for 10 people for a year. In the upper basin, a farmer might put one or two acre-feet of water on top of a field to get a crop of hay in the summer. In Arizona and California, where itโ€™s hot, they might put 10 feet on top of their field to get 10 different cuttings of alfalfa.

A high desert thunderstorm lights up the sky behind Glen Canyon Dam — Photo USBR

The big reservoirs

In January 2000, Powell and Mead were about 95% full, with 47 million acre-feet. In August 2026, they were 24% full.

No analog

Our high-flow years on Colorado River are now half as frequent, and our low-flow years are about two and a half times as common. โ€œThe take-home here is that thereโ€™s no analog in the 20th century to what weโ€™re seeing now,โ€ he said.

Colorado, the headwaters

Of the water that originates in Colorado, 90% flows out of the state.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

Democrats Seize Congress, Statehouses in Referendum on the Economy: Voters sought action on energy costs, corruption and data centers in an election environmentalists believe sets the stage for renewed climate policy — Marianne Lavelle, Dan Gearino (InsideClimateNews.org)

The Alpine Loop is a rugged 4×4 road in Coloradoโ€™s San Juan Mountains. Climb to 12,800 feet, explore old mines and ghost towns, wildflowers and abundant wildlife. With no services or cell signal, itโ€™s a pure backcountry adventure. Photo by Bob Wick/BLM

Click the link to read the article on the Inside Climate News website (Marianne Lavelle, Dan Gearino):

November 4, 2026

This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.

Democrats on Tuesday won control of both houses of Congress and a decisive mandate to put a check on Donald Trumpโ€™s tumultuous presidency, a victory propelled by voter anger over high prices, corruption and the unchecked spread of data centers.

Some of the same concerns helped to lift Democrats to victories in statehouses, where they gained a majority of the countryโ€™s governorships for the first time in more than a decade.

Voters in Ohio, South Carolina and Texasโ€”states Trump won by double digits two years agoโ€”put Democrats over the top in the U.S. Senate. And the Democratic wave surmounted a seawall of money: the unprecedented spending the GOPโ€™s tech industry allies poured into the races in recent weeks to protect the status quo and their freedom from regulation.

Activists believe the result sets the stage for renewed environmental and climate policy, even though candidates seldom mentioned those issues by name in their campaigns. They argue that any action Congress takes on votersโ€™ top issuesโ€”soaring energy prices, undue industry influence and the surge of artificial intelligence infrastructureโ€”will curb the upward trajectory of U.S. fossil fuel consumption that Trump has encouraged.

โ€œVoters rejected the Trump administrationโ€™s failing energy policies, which have pushed electricity bills higher,โ€ said David Kieve, president of EDF Action, the political arm of the nonprofit Environmental Defense Fund, which invested $18 million in the midterms. โ€œFamilies know that blocking clean energy raises rates. Paying companies to abandon wind projects, canceling grants meant to lower rural utility bills, and using emergency orders to keep coal plants running when cleaner, cheaper options are available all moved us in the wrong direction.โ€

A Broad Reaction to Republican Policies

A presidentโ€™s party typically loses seats in Congress in midterm elections, and in the face of that history, Trump urged voters to โ€œpretend Iโ€™m on the ballot.โ€ The results indicated that voters listened. Trumpโ€™s sagging approval became a millstone Republicans were forced to carry, as opponents attacked them for their complicity in an unpopular war that had caused U.S. energy prices to soar. (The decision to unilaterally join Israel in airstrikes against Iran on Feb. 28 resulted in โ€œincalculable political damage for Trumpโ€™s party,โ€ political pundit Charlie Cook wrote on the eve of the election.)

In unfortunate timing for Republicans, the U.S. oil industry last week reported its profitsโ€”$130 billion over the past six months, or triple the earnings of one year ago, all due to the war-related run-up in prices. On the campaign trail, Trump tried to frame the oil industryโ€™s boon as a blessing for Americans.

โ€œTheyโ€™re making hundreds of billions of dollarsโ€”our country isโ€”on oil,โ€ Trump said at an Oct. 26 rally in Georgia. Trump said his advisers warned him not to mention that โ€œbecause people are paying a little bit higher,โ€ but he said he didnโ€™t care how his words would be portrayed. โ€œI donโ€™t give a damn,โ€ he said. โ€œWeโ€™re making a freaking fortune!โ€

But Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) seemed to better capture the mood of his stateโ€™s voters in his last days of campaigning for reelection: โ€œUnder failed president Donald J. Trump, it costs more than ever in American history to fill up your truck, stock your fridge, visit the doctor or power your home.โ€ Ossoff coasted to re-election as expected, and former Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms defeated Republican Rick Jackson to win the Georgia governorโ€™s race.

Opposition to data centers helped Democrats in many races, such as in Ohio, where Democrat Sherrod Brown staged a political comeback and defeated Republican Sen. Jon Husted. Brown dubbed his opponent โ€œthe face of data centers,โ€ and sought to tie Husted to tax breaks and other policies that have attracted the giant computing centers to Ohio.

Trumpโ€™s foesโ€”including environmental groupsโ€”blanketed the airwaves in swing states and districts with ads tying the pain of high gasoline and electricity prices to cozy Republican relationships with oil and utility companies, tech giants and the insurance industry. โ€œVoters are not simply frustrated, theyโ€™re angry at monopoly utility companies, Big Tech, and Big Oil, who are making record profits while families struggle,โ€ said Sara Schreiber, senior vice president of LCV Victory Fund. The super PAC of the League of Conservation Voters became one of the leading outside issues groups supporting Democrats on both state and federal ballots, with a $110 million investment in the midterms.

Cabinet members like Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin and U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins fanned out into states like Iowa where Republicans were in deep trouble. They touted Trump deregulatory policies and offered aid to farmers. But pre-election polling showed key Trump administration messages on environmental protection fell flat. More than 70 percent of likely voters in Iowa, Ohio and Texas felt rollback of environmental regulations would have either no impact on making their lives more affordable or would make things more expensive, according to early October polling by The Cook Political Report, New River Strategies and GS Strategy Group.

And the polling showed voters were more worried about the inflationary impact of Republican energy policies than Democratic climate policies. About 60 percent blamed โ€œRepublicansโ€™ support for the war with Iran, trade wars, and billions in giveaways for data centersโ€ for high energy prices; only about 40 percent said they were more concerned about โ€œDemocratsโ€™ radical environmental policies like the Green New Deal.โ€

James Talarico overcame a fusillade of tech industry money to become the first Democrat that Texas will send to the U.S. Senate in 33 years. The worldโ€™s richest man, Elon Musk, alone contributed an unprecedented $445 million to super PACs, much of it to bolster Talaricoโ€™s scandal-plagued Republican opponent, Attorney General Ken Paxton. Talarico made Muskโ€™s effort to buy the seat an issue in the campaign, which resonated in a state that has been convulsed over the spread of Big Tech facilities.

Across the country, 56 percent of voters said data centers were a crucial or major factor in their picks for Congress, according to polling by The Wall Street Journal. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, seeing the tidal wave of opposition grow, imposed a temporary moratorium on new facilities in Texas. But his moves were not enough to win him re-election. State Rep. Gina Hinojosa will become the first Democratic governor of Texas since Ann Richards left office in 1995.

After pulling off her surprise victory in the South Carolina Senate race, Democrat Annie Andrews spoke of the moment as a rebellion against the status quo. โ€œYou have shown the nation that in this era of partisan divides, of vitriol and name calling, in a politics dominated by billionaires and special interest groups and insiders in Washington, D.C., that we will not bow down, that we will not back down, and we will chart our own course,โ€ she told her supporters.

As Washington enters a period of divided government, governors and state legislatures will have an opportunity to lead on climate and energy policy in ways that the federal government wonโ€™t or canโ€™t.

Democrats retained governorsโ€™ offices in Arizona, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, flipped control from Republicans in Iowa, Georgia, Ohio and Texas, and were on track to add other wins in closely watched races.

โ€œBecause of your hard work, Ohio has chosen unity and decency over division and hate,โ€ said Ohio Governor-elect Amy Acton, a former director of the state public health agency.

Democrats also won the two open seats on the Georgia Public Service Commission, a utility regulator, giving the party a 3-2 edge. The panel had been controlled by Republicans for decades and the new majority has an opportunity to address consumer concerns about rising utility bills.

Oversight Ahead

A key win for climate came early in the night with the re-election of Rep. Kathy Castor (D-Fla.), despite Florida Republicansโ€™ failed efforts at redistricting to favor the GOP. Castor, who represents storm-prone Tampa, served as chair of the House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis during Trumpโ€™s first term and has been leader of a project to develop a legislative agenda on the economy and environment for the new Congress. The so-called Thriving Economies Project unveiled a menu of 800 policy recommendations in September designed to win bipartisan support, many of them tapping into the concerns that animated voters in the midterms. (One example: Creating a Strategic Energy Affordability Reserve, drawing from windfall oil and gas profits.)

Although Democrats were on track to exceed projections and net nearly 30 House seats, they wonโ€™t be able to pass legislation without Republican support. There simply were not enough seats in play to give them a veto-proof majority. The most immediate and concrete change they can force in Washington is the kind of oversight of the Trump administration that has been missing for two years. Democratic House leaders already have signaled plans to call Zeldin and other cabinet members to task over their deep cutbacks in staff and science investments. And investigations are expected to examine the growing influence of the tech industry in reshaping American landscapes, life and even foreign policy. A leading target is the man who invested more money than anyone else in a failed effort to fend off Tuesdayโ€™s Democratic wave: Elon Musk.

Credit: Halle G./Colorado BallotTrax

DOGE cuts cost tribes $470M, gutting funding for climate projects — Joseph Lee (Grist.org)

The city of Kotzebue is seen from an MH-60 Jayhawk helicopter forward deployed to Kotzebue from Air Station Kodiak, July 17, 2013. The Coast Guard and its federal, state, local and tribal partners held a workshop and exercise in Kotzebue July 10 to test the agencies’ ability to respond to a mass rescue operation on Alaska’s northwest coast. (U.S. Coast Guard photo by Petty Officer 1st Class Shawn Eggert)

“This story was originally published by Grist. Sign up for Grist’s weekly newsletter here.”

Every year, Kotzebue, a small city in northwest Alaska, has a three-month window to receive all the diesel fuel it will use throughout the following year. It sits on a gravel spit that juts into Kotzebue Sound just north of the Arctic Circle, and is accessible only by air and sea. Ice keeps freight barges from reaching it for most of the year.

The community relies on diesel for 75 percent of its power, and residents put about 20 percent of their income toward buying it. Thatโ€™s more than three times the average energy burden for low-income households nationwide.

โ€œWeโ€™re pretty much at the mercy of world markets,โ€ Chad Nordlum, who is the energy project manager for the Native Village of Kotzebue, told Grist. โ€œRight now, with the Iran war going on, the diesel prices are very high and weโ€™re locked in to much higher prices than weโ€™ve had in the past. Thereโ€™s really nothing the community can do about diesel prices, but what we can do is produce our own energy.โ€

Thatโ€™s why Nordlum was so excited about a $20 million grant from the Environmental Protection Agency to support a wind energy project. The funding, announced in 2024, was part of a larger $150 million allocation for tribal infrastructure in Alaska. Nordlum says it would have lowered the communityโ€™s reliance on diesel to about 40 percent to 50 percent and given the tribe more control over energy and economic decisions.

But the Trump administration canceled the grant in May 2025. More than a year later, the project remains paused.

That cut was among hundreds of millions of dollars the Department of Government Efficiency pulled from Indian Country, and part of a broader pattern of funding rollbacks and underinvestment in Indigenous communities. Two new reports from the Brookings Institution show that the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act killed many of the funding streams established by the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, while DOGE eliminated another $468 million, about half of which was allocated for environmental and natural resources. Another 11 percent targeted agriculture. Those projects include climate resiliency plans, renewable energy projects, and jobs programs.

According to Brookings, despite historic investments flowing into Indian Country after the pandemic, a massive underinvestment in Indigenous communities continues. Not only is that a violation of the federal governmentโ€™s trust and treaty obligations to tribes, it is hindering Indigenous efforts to protect the environment and address climate change. The report authors are calling for policy changes that would ensure tribes receive funding, regardless of political winds.

Rob Maxim, who is Mashpee Wampanoag and a fellow at Brookings Metro, said climate and environmental funding is especially crucial for Indigenous communities because they are often the most severely impacted by climate change, especially after years of underinvestment.

โ€œThe actions that the Trump administration is taking are particularly significant, but itโ€™s not totally out of trend with previous administrations,โ€ he said. โ€œAnd what we wanted to show was that actually this underinvestment is kind of the default for the U.S. rather than a blip.โ€

The true aberration was the unprecedented levels of funding after the pandemic. That funding, which came under the Biden administration, included over $700 million in climate, energy, and infrastructure funding for tribes. It covered projects like development of climate action plans, food systems analysis, and more. For example, the Hopi Tribe was to receive a $25 million grant to install solar panels for 600 homes. That grant, and the entire $7 billion Solar for All program, were cut.

Maxim says that funding for Indigenous communities is a federal obligation based on treaties and other agreements with tribes and should be standard and irrevocable. โ€œThe funding that was flowing to Indian Country was not being done on the basis of race or DEI, and it was absolutely not illegal,โ€ he said. โ€œIt was aimed at the promotion of tribal sovereignty and the well-being of tribal citizens and tribal communities, and so that is, you know, an obligation that the U.S. government maintains.โ€

The White House and the EPA did respond to requests for comment.

Glencora Haskins, a senior research associate and applied research manager at Brookings Metro, said that the administration had targeted funding to tribes, with โ€œtribalโ€ being the most frequently flagged term. โ€œI think that there was a very surface-level view of what a lot of these programs were doing, rather than any deep interrogation of the types of systemic infrastructure deficits that programs were trying to fix,โ€ Haskins said.

In Native communities throughout Alaska, and around the country, energy and infrastructure needs are especially acute because of increasingly frequent and destructive storms, wildfires, and other climate-driven disasters.

Haskins and Maxim recommend that Congress pass legislation that bars the cancellation of grants and contracts for tribes, and stipulates that all funding for Indigenous nations and communities is in service of trust and treaty obligations even if it is from a program with a different stated purpose. They also call for a statutory requirement that money should flow directly to tribes rather than having them seek reimbursement from the U.S. Treasury.

In Kotzebue, Chad Nordlum hopes the political tide will turn enough to get the funding for the wind project moving. In the meantime, he is working on a smaller solar project that he hopes will help alleviate the communityโ€™s energy challenges.

โ€œOur main goals are energy security and economic development for the tribe, which is ultimately being able to invest in our own community, help make the lives of people here a little more sustainable,โ€ Nordlum said. โ€œWe want our community to continue on into the future. We have to get a handle on our energy prices and availability.โ€

This article originally appeared in Grist at https://grist.org/indigenous/doge-cuts-cost-tribes-470-million-gutting-funding-for-climate-projects/.

Arizona water agencies are in court over the #ColoradoRiver. What comes next? — KJZZ #COriver #aridification

The Colorado River’s Horseshoe Bend. Photo credit: Gert Boers/Unsplash

Click the link to read the article on the KJZZ website (Alex Hager). Here’s an excerpt:

November 2, 2026

The Arizona Department of Water Resources filed a motion to intervene in Nevadaโ€™s lawsuit against the federal government. The Central Arizona Project โ€” which operates a 336-mile canal system that carries Colorado River Water to the Phoenix and Tucson areas โ€” did the same less than two weeks later. The legal moves represent an escalation in a contentious, yearslong saga over how to respond to increasingly dry conditions along a river that supplies nearly 40 million people across seven Western states…Nevadaโ€™s original lawsuit chiefly argues one thing. It says the Interior Department needs to go back and redo its plans for cutting back water use in three Colorado River states โ€” Arizona, California and Nevada, collectively known as the Lower Basin…With states at an impasse, the federal government reluctantly came up with its own plan. The Interior Department decided that the Lower Basin would have to cut back, but did not force any new cutbacks on the Upper Basin. The plan gives Interior the option to cut Colorado River supplies for Arizona, California and Nevada by up to 40% per year, with Arizona being the hardest hit. Those states were quick to call that plan unfair. Now, theyโ€™re going further and arguing that it was illegal…

Photo credit: Central Arizona Project

The lawsuit argues that federal authorities are legally obligated to consider the impact of new water management plans while drawing up required environmental paperwork. A plan that slashes so much water for millions of people and major industries, it explains, has not done enough to consider the harm of those cutbacks. Arizonaโ€™s top water official, Tom Buschatzke, said the new river plan would โ€œdevastateโ€ Arizonaโ€™s economy, and โ€œignores basic elements of the law of the riverโ€ to do so…Those agencies, alongside Nevada, are asking Interior to come up with a new cutback plan that considers that harm and spreads water cuts more evenly across the region…That ask for a redo is only part of the reason Arizona joined Nevadaโ€™s lawsuit. Between the lines of the filing, the state is making a bigger point. The Lower Basin is in this mess, the state explains, because its upstream neighbors are violating the foundational laws that have governed the river since 1922. If that doesnโ€™t change, Arizona has the ammunition it needs to take an Upper Basin state, or states, to the Supreme Court sometime soon. It is using this lawsuit to put those ideas in writing…Now, some water officials say the conditions are right to bring that bigger lawsuit. Arizona could sue a state or states in the Upper Basin for failing to deliver a legally-mandated amount of water downstream. CAP officials say the upstream states have already fallen below that amount…

Itโ€™s impossible to predict exactly how long a case over the 1922 Colorado River Compact would take to work its way through the legal process, but other water disputes can provide some hints. In Texas v. New Mexico and Colorado, a dispute over water from the Rio Grande spent 13 years in court before it was finally settled in early 2026. In 1985, Kansas sued Colorado for taking too much water from the Arkansas River. That case wasnโ€™t resolved until 2009, more than two decades after it began. A Colorado River case would be highly complex, considering the riverโ€™s connection to seven states, 30 federally recognized Native American tribes and the country of Mexico. Because of that, Eklund said, it could take even longer than two decades, a perilously long time given the record-setting low levels at the nationโ€™s largest reservoirs.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0
Map of the Arkansas River drainage basin. Created using USGS National Map and NASA SRTM data. By Shannon1 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=79039596
The Rio Grande Basin spans Colorado, New Mexico and Texas. Credit: Chas Chamberlin

Archuleta County faces lasting challenges after severe flooding: Road closures, damaged infrastructure and communication outages affect residents across region — The #Durango Herald #SanJuanRiver

Pagosa Springs recorded 1 to 1.5 inches of rainfall from Sunday afternoon through Monday morning, according to National Weather Service data. (Courtesy of Matthew Martin and @thisispagosa)

Click the link to read the article on The Durango Herald website (Tyler Brown). Here’s an excerpt:

November 2, 2026

[Vicki] Shaffer said cellular service was down, leaving residents to rely on landline phones or internet connections to communicate. T-Mobile service was restored at about 4:45 p.m. Monday. She could not provide updated figures on the number of people rescued or evacuated, or the number of structures destroyed. Videos circulating on social media showed floodwaters carrying a home down the San Juan River and into a pedestrian bridge, destroying the structure. Another post showed part of the foundation of the Pagosa Springs History Museum building torn away by floodwaters. According to Shaffer, National Guard helicopters returned to Pagosa Springs on Monday to aid in rescue and recovery efforts. U.S. Highway 160 remained closed from both directions entering Pagosa Springs on Tuesday, as CDOT crews tended to a portion of the Piedra River Bridge which had been completely washed away from the floods…

An aerial view of Colorado Highway 151 flood damage from the previous week, between Ignacio and Pagosa Springs. (Courtesy of Colorado Department of Transportation)

State Highway 151 near Chimney Rock also remained closed because of flood damage.

#Mancos residents asked to conserve water after flooding: Significant damages to wastewater facility and Cottonwood Park — The #Cortez Journal #MancosRiver

Flooding in Mancos. Credit: Facebook via Google (I could not locate the poster.)

Click the link to read the article on The Cortez Journal website (Anna Watson). Here’s an excerpt:

November 2, 2026

Residents are being asked to conserve water because the flood levels have caused an increase in sediment levels. A town news release said residents are required to limit nonessential use to help maintain an adequate supply while treatment conditions improve. Goodall said there is no indication the townโ€™s main drinking water supply has been contaminated, but he said officials must manage the high sediment levels, ensuring they build up a reserve of potable water. Goodall estimates residents will need to conserve water for one to two weeks or until the sediment dissipates…

He said officials were still assessing the damage of the wastewater treatment facility. In a post on Facebook, the town said floodwaters topped the wastewater treatment lagoons, causing water to overflow into and out of the ponds. The incident impacts the wastewater system, not the townโ€™s infrastructure upstream that treats drinking water…โ€œOur crews remain on the scene to manage the situation. Out of an abundance of caution and in compliance with safety protocols, we have already notified downstream partners, including the CDPHE, the Ute Tribe, and federal oversight agencies, to ensure a coordinated response,โ€ the post read. Out of safety, the town asked that people avoid contact with the Mancos River downstream of Cottonwood Park.

Map of the San Juan River, a tributary of the Colorado River, in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah, USA. Made using USGS National Map data. By Shannon1 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47456307

Evacuations, road closures continue as flooding peaks in southwest #Colorado: #SanJuanRiver peaked at 16.81 feet Sunday night in #PagosaSprings, river gauges show — The #Denver Post

Click the link to read the article on The Denver Post website (Lauren Penington and Katie Langford). Here’s an excerpt:

November 2, 2026

Dangerous floodwaters threatened homes and communities across southwestern Colorado on Monday, causing widespread damage to towns and counties already incapacitated by flooding from rain-swollen rivers one week earlier. The San Juan River in Pagosa Springs rose to nearly 17 feet on Sunday as an estimated 3 to 4 inches of rain fell over land already saturated by heavy precipitation. The river did not hit the record-breaking 22-foot crest that forecasters expected, but the 16.81-foot crest recorded Sunday night is the second-highest on record and two feet higher than one week ago, according to preliminary data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationโ€™s river gauges. Southern Colorado officials ordered mandatory evacuations for people living in parts of La Plata, Archuleta, Rio Grande, Mineral, Conejos and Montezuma counties, including parts of Pagosa Springs, Durango, Del Norte, Ignacio and Mancos…Sundayโ€™s storm brought similar or slightly less rain than the storm that caused widespread flooding in the area more than a week earlier, but the water had nowhere to go, National Weather Service meteorologist Eric Petersen said. The ground was still saturated from the previous floods, unable to absorb much more, and reservoirs were already filled to the brink, pushing water downstream, said Petersen, who works in the weather serviceโ€™s Pueblo office…

Mandatory evacuation orders are also in effect for residents along the South Fork of the Rio Grande River, including in Del Norte, Monte Vista and South Fork. Part of southern Del Norte remained on pre-evacuation status. An updated evacuation map is available online. Roughly 2,773 people were evacuated, according to South Fork Fire Rescue. As of Monday morning, no injuries or missing people had been reported…The South Fork of the Rio Grande hit โ€œmajorโ€ flooding of 8.88 feet late Sunday night near South Fork and held relatively steady overnight. As of Monday morning, the river was still expected to rise near Del Norte and Monte Vista, according to NOAA flood gauges.

Animas River Flooding

NEWSWIRE: White Mesa Spiritual Walk; uranium hype ramping up; President Trump goes all in on public lands grazing — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org)

Protesters walk in the 10th Annual White Mesa Ute Community Spiritual Walk and Protest on Oct. 17. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

October 30, 2026

On a sunny and warm October day between storms, Ute Mountain Ute Tribal Council Member Marilynn House stood before a large crowd gathered at the White Mesa Community Center for a spiritual walk to protest the effects of Energy Fuelโ€™s nearby White Mesa Uranium mill. Itโ€™s about โ€œgetting the word out about what this mill is doing to our community and our children and the people that live here,โ€ she said.

The spiritual walk, from the Ute Mountain Ute community of White Mesa to the entrance of the mill, has taken place for ten years to rally support and raise awareness of the issues surrounding the mill. It is not only built on sacred ground, but its tailings ponds have been known to leak and contaminate groundwater aquifers. The concern is that the contaminants will migrate into the communityโ€™s drinking water and culturally significant springs.

โ€œMe and my family are fighting for the mill because we care for our kids, our grandkids, we care for them โ€ฆ Theyโ€™re ruining our water, we got well water here, every time we run the water it donโ€™t smell good,โ€ said Thelma Whiskers, who, along with her daughter Yolanda Badback, founded White Mesa Concerned Community to push back on the mill.

Recording credit: Jonathan P. Thompson

The speakers โ€” and singers โ€” were emotional, impassioned, and their words and songs poignant and moving. More than a protest, it was a demonstration of solidarity with the White Mesa communityโ€™s cause.

This yearโ€™s turnout was substantial, and included members of the American Indian Movement from southern California and the Navajo Nation, as well as Havasupai tribal members who are grappling with the other side of the uranium fuel cycle. They have been pushing back on Energy Fuelsโ€™ Pinyon Plain Mine near the Grand Canyon for years. Pinyon Plain has been trucking ore to the White Mesa Mill via accident-prone highways for the last couple of years.

Copper Point in San Juan County, Utah, was right on the original boundary of Bears Ears National Monument until Trump shrunk the monument this summer. Shortly after the shrinkage, Land Survey Associates staked mining claims just below and on this side of the point on historically mined areas. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

โ›๏ธ MINING MONITOR โ›๏ธ

  • DISA Uranium considers establishing a headquarters โ€” with an associated 118 jobs โ€” in Grand Junction, Colorado, after the Colorado Economic Development Commission approves nearly $1.6 million in tax credits. The firm plans to use its patented high pressure slurry ablation method to extract uranium from historic and abandoned mine waste piles in the Four Corners Region and has signed agreements with various firms to try its technology; it is still awaiting BLM approval to use the method at a Montrose County mine. Thirty-six of the new mining claims staked in areas removed from Bears Ears National Monument were on historic mining sites with associated waste piles, leading to speculation that Disa is behind the claims. Disa did not respond to Land Desk queries concerning the matter. (Hoodline)
  • Dan Proctor, a self-employed exploration geologist from Pleasant Grove, Utah, stakes more than 40 new mining claims in areas President Donald Trump illegally removed from Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, including several right on the boundary of the remaining monument. (Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance)
  • A new analysis finds that average arsenic levels in groundwater in the Pinyon Plain uranium mineโ€™s monitoring wells near the Grand Canyon are uncharacteristically high, again raising concerns of more widespread contamination of area aquifers. (Grand Canyon Trust, Inside Climate News)
  • Anfield Energy says the Utah Department of Environmental Quality has sent it draft copies of its proposed radioactive materials license and groundwater discharge permits necessary to restart its Shootaring Canyon uranium mill near Ticaboo. (Mining)
๐Ÿ‘ฉ๐Ÿฝโ€๐Ÿ”ฌ SCIENCE! ๐Ÿงซ
  • Utah Geological Survey paleontologists find a new species of dinosaur near Arches National Park in the Ironstone Bonebed, believed to represent the aftermath of a mass extinction event during the Jurassic-to-Cretaceous transition some 140 million years ago. (SFGate)
๐Ÿฎ GRAZING GAZETTE ๐Ÿฅฉ
  • Interior Secretary Doug Burgum issues a Secretarial Order to โ€œsupport domestic livestock production by expanding grazing opportunitiesโ€ on public lands by making vacated allotments and other lands available for grazing, expediting grazing permit renewals, reinstating inactive or suspended animal unit months, weakening regulations that โ€œunnecessarily limitโ€ grazing, and making it easier to kill predators that may threaten livestock. (Western Watersheds Project, Interior Department)
  • Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins sends a letter to U.S. Forest Service grazing permittees introducing its Ranchers First webpage and reaffirming the administrationโ€™s commitment to open more public lands to livestock operators, gut regulations, and to be the โ€œmost pro-rancher administration in history.โ€ (USDA)

Trump looks to Make America Graze Again — Jonathan P. Thompson

The West’s Sacred Cow — Jonathan P. Thompson


๐Ÿ›ข๏ธ FOSSIL FUEL FOLLIES ๐Ÿ“ˆ
  • Navajo Transitional Energy Company signs up to export $100 million worth of coal from its Spring Creek Mine in Montana to a Malaysia firm. (US Energy Department)
โ›ˆ๏ธ WACKY WEATHER WATCHโšก๏ธ
  • Archuleta County, Colorado, officials estimate last weekโ€™s flooding affected 800 structures, shut down 13 Forest Service roads, and rendered 150 miles of county roads impassible after the San Juan River rose 15 feet and sent some 44,238 cubic feet per second of water into Navajo Reservoir. (Colorado Sun)
  • Floodwaters in the Rio Puerco swept away and killed a woman in the San Francisco area of Socorro County, New Mexico, after heavy rains lift the waterway high above flood stage last weekend. (KKOB)
๐Ÿค– DATA CENTER DIGEST ๐Ÿ‘พ
  • Peabody Energy considers building coal-fired generating plants at its mines in the Powder River Basin to power data centers to offset declining coal sales.(Cowboy State Daily)
  • Prometheus Hyperscale drops plans to build a 1,250-MW data center complex near Casper, Wyoming, amid widespread opposition to the facilities, but says it is moving forward with its $32 billion data center and power plant near Evanston. (WyoFile)
  • The Center for Western Priorities launches an interactive map tracking data center proposals on public lands that is currently tracking 35 cases on 24,000 acres in six states. (Center for Western Priorities)
๐Ÿ”‹ENERGY TRANSITION ๐Ÿ”Œ
  • Western Colorado electric cooperatives estimate that buying power from Accelergenโ€™s proposed 125-megawatt solar-plus-storage facility east of Cortez could save ratepayers $20 million, but the development has raised concerns over impacts to views and property values and the risk of battery fires. The project would use lithium-iron-phosphate batteries, which are less susceptible to thermal runaway and fires than more conventional lithium-ion batteries. (CPR)
  • Boulder, Colorado-based Scout Clean Energy proposes two huge utility-scale solar-plus-storage projects on public and private land southeast of Pyramid Lake in northern Nevada. With a combined capacity of 2,000 megawatts, they would dwarf even the largest existing arrays. (Nevada Independent)
๐Ÿ“ COMMENTARY
  • Dinรฉ leaders categorically reject President Donald Trumpโ€™s proclamations shrinking Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante national monuments,saying, โ€œNo sitting president has the right to disregard the voices, leadership and land-management practices of tribal sovereign nations, including the ones that comprise the Bears Ears Commission, or to sideline the meaningful consultation owed to the tribes who are inextricably tied to these ancestral lands.โ€ (High Country News)
๐ŸŒž ANNOUNCEMENTS ๐Ÿ˜Ž
  • The Wright-Ingraham Institute begins accepting applications for its Field Workshop 2027, a three-week advanced fellowship for graduate students and early-career practitioners from any field. The workshop will be centered in the San Luis Valley and Taos Plateau in Colorado and New Mexico. (Wright-Ingraham)
  • The Bluff Community Foundation is accepting donations to assist flood-recovery efforts for residents of Bluff and neighboring communities that were affected by the recent storms and high water. (Bluff Community Foundation)
๐Ÿ“ธ PARTING SHOT ๐ŸŽž๏ธ
Homes and Monument Valley. Jonathan P. thompson photo.

As October flooding recedes, the #SanLuisValley pins its hopes on a wet winter: The 3-month forecast predicts a better water year, and there are other encouraging early signs that a more beneficial spring runoff is in the cards — AlamosaCitizen.com #RioGrande

After the floods of October, the mountains surrounding the Valley are capped with snow. Looking east from the La Garita church toward the Sangre de Cristo range. Credit: Ryan Michelle Scavo

Click the link to read the article on the Alamosa Citizen website:

November 1, 2026:

The historic rains of Oct. 22-25 increased the annual flow of the Rio Grande by nearly 100,000 acre-feet and the Conejos River by around 60,000 acre-feet, according to preliminary data by the Colorado Division of Water Resources.

As fast as those rivers rose, though, they are receding just as quickly.

For the second straight October, the San Luis Valley found itself in historic flooding conditions, with this yearโ€™s fall storm delivering the fastest cubic-feet per second flow on the Rio Grande in nearly 80 years at 11,000 cfs.

โ€œWe saw very high flows in the past week or so, and we got a lot of recharge to the aquifers from those flows. However, we will need many, many more high-flow years to recover the aquifers and the water system as a whole,โ€ said Craig Cotten, DWR division engineer in the San Luis Valley.

San Luis Valley Groundwater

The state is estimating the flooding allowed around 50,000 acre-feet of recharge to the closed basin area, which Cotten said is great. But understand, he said, that the unconfined aquifer has lost an estimated 72,000 acre-feet in the past year.

โ€œThe high precipitation event this past week is an encouraging sign for next year (spring 2027 runoff). However, recall that we had a similar high precipitation event last October that caused large streamflows and flooding, and yet it didnโ€™t correspond to a good streamflow year this year,โ€ he said. โ€œIn fact, this year would have been one of the driest on record if not for the increased precipitation over the past month.โ€

The same was said just ahead of the October 2025 storm, with the unconfined aquifer measuring at its lowest point at the time, and whatever water in the river at a near standstill. Then the Rio Grande hit 9,000 cfs and grew by 80,000 acre-feet and the Conejos by 20,000 acre-feet from the October 2025 storm. Only to be followed by the second warmest November on record and the first warmest December on record, according to National Weather Service data.

Will 2026 be any different? The next 3-month forecast says it will, and there are other encouraging early signs that a more beneficial 2027 spring runoff is in the cards.

The Rio Grande has receded from its record-high flows, and the mountains have snow at last. Credit: The Citizen

For starters, and this is a big one, the 14ers that surround the Valley are all forming snow caps, including on the south face of Mt. Blanca, which hasnโ€™t been the case in a couple of years.

Ask the irrigators who rely on Trinchera Creek about that. Theyโ€™re having a better October, like the rest of the Valleyโ€™s agricultural community.

The irrigation season has been extended to Nov. 6 on the Rio Grande and Conejos River, and Cotten said it may be extended on the Alamosa River as well.

Currently, the Rio Grandeโ€™s forecasted annual flow at Del Norte is 440,000 acre-feet, or 68 percent of average. Of that, 109,000 acre-feet belongs to the Rio Grande Compact with New Mexico and Texas, according to Cotten. For the Conejos, the projected annual flow is 220,000 acre-feet or 82 percent of average, and a water compact obligation of 57,000 acre-feet.

Those totals likely grow in the coming weeks, should November storms arise.

The October storm couldnโ€™t have been timed more perfectly to hold the moisture, with clocks set to turn back an hour Nov. 1. The return to standard time marks earlier and darker evenings, which allows for longer nights and the cold to settle in before the rise of the morning sun.

Lush green fields in Conejos County. Credit: The Citizen

Overnight temperatures are key moving through November and December if there is to be true benefit to the Valley floor going into 2027. The National Weather Service forecast remains encouraging for the type of snowy winter the Upper Rio Grande Basin desires, with climate maps showing above-normal levels of moisture December through February and an equal chance for winter-like temperatures.

โ€œWe will see what actually happens,โ€ said Cotten, mindful of the currently warm temperatures that, mixed with the October rains, have left the Valleyโ€™s growing fields looking lush and ready for another cut.

The growing fields and marshes will most certainly โ€œgo to bed wetโ€ as they say, just like an October ago. Only this time, with more moisture potentially on the way in the first days of November, there is hope again for a change in the Valleyโ€™s fortunes.

Rio Grande and Pecos River basins. Map credit: By Kmusser – Own work, Elevation data from SRTM, drainage basin from GTOPO [1], U.S. stream from the National Atlas [2], all other features from Vector Map., CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11218868

South Platte River Basin #climate for the week ending November 2, 2026 #SouthPlatteRiver

Below is the Snow Water Equivalent in South Platte graph from the NRCS for November 2, 2026. Snowpack is 28% of the median (down 16% one week, wild swings this time of the accumulation season) and 2% of the median peak (down 2% one week). There are 175 days until the median peak. Iโ€™ve added the lines for 2026, 2018, 2012, and 2002 since the statewide drought is still very pronounced.

Below is the Precipitation Accumulation in South Platte graph from the NRCS for November 2, 2026. This morning precipitation, at the SNOTEL stations, is at 68% of the median (down 11% one week), and 6% of the water year median (up 1% one week), There are 333 days left in the water year. Iโ€™ve added the lines for 2026, 2018, 2012, and 2002 since the statewide drought is still very pronounced.

There is a chance for snow showers today, and snow showers are likely Wednesday, in the central mountains. Rain/snow is likely today, with a chance for rain/snow Wednesday, in the northern mountains. Showers are likely today, with a chance for showers Wednesday, down here about 13 miles from South Table Mountain, where Ku Klux Klansmen burned crosses to celebrate Denver Mayor Ben Stapleton surviving a recall election in August 1924. From Wikipedia:

As chronicled by Robert Alan Goldberg in his book Hooded Empireย : The Ku Klux Klan in Colorado, Stapleton was the Klan candidate for mayor of Denver in 1923 and won the election with Klan support. When Stapleton declared his candidacy for mayor in March 1923, he was Klan member number 1,128 and a close friend of the Colorado Klan Grand Dragon, John Galen Locke. Rumors of Stapleton’s Klan membership circulated during the mayoral campaign. Stapleton responded by denying that he was a Klan member and condemning the Klan, “to appease his Jewish and Catholic supporters.”โ€Š Stapleton declared, “True Americanism needs no mask or disguise. Any attempt to stir up racial prejudices or religious intolerance is contrary to our constitution and is therefore un-American.” The voters believed Stapleton’s denial and he was elected, defeating an unpopular incumbent, Dewey Bailey. Stapleton then appointed fellow Klansmen to multiple positions in Denver government, though he initially resisted Klan pressure to appoint a Klansman as chief of police.

An anti-Stapleton backlash developed due to the Klan’s infiltration of Denver government. The anti-Stapleton coalition began the process of petitioning for a recall election. Stapleton knew that to survive the recall he would need Klan support. He capitulated to the Klan demand that he appoint a Klansman as police chief, with the result that the police department became in effect a Klan organization. This galvanized the anti-Stapleton forces and they succeeded in forcing a recall election of Stapleton in August 1924.

According to Goldberg’s description of the recall election, “[t]he Klan dominated the Stapleton campaign, contributing more than $15,000 and scores of election workers.”โ€Š “On July 14, 1924, Mayor Stapleton addressed a Klan gathering on South Table Mountain and reaffirmed his commitment: ‘I have little to say, except that I will work with the Klan and for the Klan in the coming election, heart and soul. And if I am reelected, I shall give the Klan the kind of administration it wants.'”โ€Š The anti-Stapleton coalition had run a poor candidate against Stapleton in the recall election (Dewey Bailey, the incumbent mayor Stapleton defeated in 1923), and Stapleton won the recall election by a landslide. On the night of the election, Denver Klansmen burned crosses on South Table Mountain to signify their victory.

Benjamin Stapleton. By Harry Mellon Rhoads – Denver Library Digital Collections, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=72155568
South Table Mountain. Date: 1910-1920. View from evergreen lined Lariat Loop Road on Lookout Mountain east over Golden. Credit: Denver Public Library Digital Collections

Hereโ€™s a look at the Colorado 7-Day precipitation map through October 30, 2026 from the High Plains Regional Climate Center. Precipitation in the South Platte Basin along the Continental Divide of the Americas ranged from 0.00โ€ to 1.50โ€ณ.

Hereโ€™s the Colorado 7-Day percent of normal precipitation map through October 30, 2026 from the High Plains Regional Climate Center. Precipitation in the South Platte River Basin along the Continental Divide of the Americas ranged from 0% to 800% of normal.

Hereโ€™s the most recent 7-Day Departure from Normal Temperature (F) for Colorado through October 30, 2026 from the High Plains Regional Climate Center.

Below is the 7-day Quantitative Precipitation Forecast for the week of November 2, 2026. Precipitation is anticipated for the mountains of the South Platte River Basin and may total up to 0.25โ€ณ

Below are the 8-14 day outlooks from the Climate Prediction Center, issued November 1, 2026, for temperature and precipitation, for the week starting November 9, 2026. The CPC expects above normal temperatures and near normal precipitation for the mountains of the South Platte River Basin.

Below is the Colorado Drought Monitor map from October 27, 2026. There were one category improvements in Weld, Adams, Denver, Arapahoe, Douglas, Elbert, Logan, and Sedgwick counties in the South Platte River Basin. There were one category degradations in Morgan, Weld, Larimer, Boulder, Adams, Park, and Logan counties. There were two and 3 category degradations in Morgan County. Drought and abnormal dryness covers 65.13% of Colorado. The South Platte Basin is experiencing Abnormally Dry, Moderate, Severe, Extreme, and Exceptional drought conditions.

Below is the Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending October 27, 2026.

Hereโ€™s the US Drought Monitor Map from last week along with the one week U.S. change map.

Finally, Russ Schumacher Colorado’s State Climatologist, posted about the the rains and floods in southwest Colorado last week and there was this tidbit about El Niรฑo:

Where does El Niรฑo fit in to this story, and whatโ€™s coming next?

As Peter [Goble] outlined in this post, the fall season is when we see some of the most robust connections between El Niรฑo and precipitation in Colorado, with falls tending to be wetter than average in southern Colorado during El Niรฑo. It is quite remarkable how closely this fallโ€™s precipitation patterns thus far match the historical correlations: on the figure below, look at how similar the green shading in the map on the left is to the areas that have seen above-average precipitation this fall!

(left) Map showing the historical correlation between El Niรฑo-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and fall precipitation in Colorado, with areas shaded in green showing where fall tends to be wetter during El Niรฑo. (right) Percent of average precipitation from September 1 through October 27.

#PagosaSprings water and wastewater service providers report at least $13 million in flooding damage — The Pagosa Springs Sun

A view of San Juan River flooding in downtown Pagosa Springs on Friday, October 23, 2026. (Photo courtesy of Jacque Aragon)

Click the link to read the article on The Pagosa Springs Sun website (Josh Pike). Here’s an excerpt:

October 29, 2026

Pagosa Springsโ€™ water and wastewater service providers โ€” the Pagosa Area Water and Sanitation District (PAWSD) and the Pagosa Springs Sanitation General Improvement District (PSSGID) โ€” suffered more than $13 million in damage to their systems in last weekโ€™s flooding event, according to Wednesday estimates. The PSSGID suffered about $9 million in damage, stated Pagosa Springs Town Manager David Harris, while PAWSD Programs Manager Renee Lewis indicated that, on Wednesday morning, PAWSD estimated damages at $4,005,000. Lewis emphasized that this is a โ€œVERY preliminaryโ€ estimate since some PAWSD infrastructure is still inaccessible. According to Harris, the PSSGID, which provides sewer service for downtown Pagosa Springs and is operated by the Town of Pagosa Springs, primarily suffered damage to all three of its lift stations, its two pumping stations on the line that moves wastewater from downtown to PAWSDโ€™s Vista wastewater treatment plant, and to the sewer line that runs under the 1st Street bridge on U.S. 160. He explained that the pumps and electrical equipment at these stations all suffered damage due to being inundated with water and that at least some of the equipment in all these stations will likely need to be replaced. Harris stated that the pump stations on the line to Vista are currently operating with one set of dry and submersible pumps each, when they normally use two sets of pumps that alternate operations to give each set downtime. He indicated that the inundation during the flooding also led to the system overflowing raw sewage into the San Juan River once its pumping capacity was exceeded at the Vista pipeline. The forced main for the Vista pipeline handled 1.7 million gallons of water on Thursday, Oct. 22; 1.58 million gallons on Friday, Oct. 23; and 1.32 million gallons on Saturday, Oct. 24, Harris stated. He added that the pipeline usually handles about 350,000 gallons of wastewater per day…

The damage to the 1st Street bridge pipeline was due to the water rising high enough to destroy the pipe that runs under the bridge, Harris stated. Prior to the flooding, the PSSGID implemented a bypass using a flexible pipe running along the sidewalk on top of the bridge and a temporary pump on the east end of the bridge, Harris explained, which is still in operation since the normal pipe has been destroyed. He added that this incident accounts for a significant portion of the cost of the damages that the PSSGID suffered. Harris also stated that the PSSGID suffered other miscellaneous damage, including to work that was in progress to replace sections of the McCabe Creek sewer line, which is a large source of inflow and infiltration of outside water into the PSSGID system…Connor states in his update that the district will likely have to replace the exposed lines at Mockingbird Lane and North Pagosa Boulevard in the future, but that this will occur in conjunction with the county repairing the road washouts that cause the exposures. His update states that the Snowball and Hatcher Lake water treatment plants are fully operational and that the diversion on the San Juan River that provides water to the Snowball plant and its associated reservoir has been cleared sufficiently to allow water to flow into the reservoir. The San Juan water treatment plant, located at PAWSDโ€™s offices at 100 Lyn Ave., which also contains the Vista wastewater treatment plant, was shut off before the flooding began, according to Lewis. In an Oct. 23 update to the PAWSD board, Connor also states that the Vista wastewater treatment plant โ€œheldโ€ during the flooding and remains operational. He adds that the plant treated 5.7 million gallons of wastewater during the Oct. 22 and Oct. 23 flooding events. In her update, Lewis states that damage to the river and creek diversions that feed PAWSDโ€™s water treatment plants is yet to be fully determined.

โ€˜Unprecedentedโ€™: Area experiences historic flooding, damage — #PagosaSprings Sun #SanJuanRiver

Click the link to read the article on the Pagosa Springs Sun website (Clayton Chaney and Randi Pierce). Here’s an excerpt:

October 29, 2026

The San Juan River peaked at 15.02 feet at about 5:45 a.m. on Friday, Oct. 23, becoming the second highest flooding event in recorded history for the river, short of only the 1911 flood which peaked at 17.8 feet. Extensive damage was caused to roads, homes and other critical infrastructure all throughout the county…There have been no known fatalities or injuries, according to incident officials. Archuleta County Commissioner Warren Brown indicated at a community meeting on Tuesday, Oct. 27, that 800 structures in the county have been impacted by the flood, with 540 of those structures being homes…

During a joint meeting held by the Archuleta County Board of County Commissioners and Pagosa Springs Town Council on Monday, Oct. 26, Archuleta County Sheriff Mike Le Roux and Pagosa Springs Police Chief Bill Rockensock addressed the BoCC and town council, providing a review of how the community prepared and responded throughout the disaster event. Le Roux explained that the Archuleta County Sheriffโ€™s Office (ACSO) began receiving forecasts early in the week, working with the Pagosa Weather team. He explained that based on the flooding that occurred in 2025, โ€œWe understood what a forecast level in that flood zone would look like.โ€

[…]

Le Roux explained how this yearโ€™s flooding event was different than last yearโ€™s, with the majority of rainfall received during last yearโ€™s flood falling in the โ€œcatchment area.โ€ He noted there was more localized rain this year.

โ€œThe volume and intensity of rain that we received down low started creating localized flooding and which we were starting to see the impact to the community prior to the river level getting to high flood,โ€ he said. Le Roux explained that response crews continued working through the night on Thursday, with the San Juan River peaking the morning of Friday, Oct. 23.

โ€œOne of the most amazing things Iโ€™ve ever seen, to be honest with you,โ€ Rockensock said.

While the San Juan River hit its second highest level on record, the other three rivers that run through Archuleta County experienced record flows on Friday, Oct. 23, according to National Water Predictions Service data. The Piedra River near Arboles surpassed its previous record of 6.4 feet, hitting 10.48 feet at about 5:45 a.m. The Navajo River near Chromo hit 7.8 feet at about 4:15 a.m., surpassing the previous record of 5.1 feet. The Rio Blanco near Pagosa Springs hit 5.56 feet at about 7 a.m., besting the previous record of 5.26. Late Wednesday morning, Navajo State Park reported the lakeโ€™s current elevation is 6,045 feet โ€” 66.29 percent full pool. In a statement on Facebook, the park states that, on Oct. 21, the reservoirโ€™s elevation was 6,022.

Tracked Colorado River system reservoirs in flow order, each drawn filled to its percent-full reading as of October 31, 2026. Blue Mesa (Gunnison), Flaming Gorge (Green) and Navajo (San Juan) are upper-basin tributary storage; their water reaches the mainstem through Lake Powell. Rendered at build time from the gauge record. Credit: ReservoirBench.com

โ€œThe reservoir has risen 23 feet in 7 days!ย ย On Friday, October 23, in one day, the lake rose 8.89 feet.ย ย Unbelievable! The inflow on that day was 45,205 cfs,โ€ the statement reads…

Rain totals

According to reports entered into the Community Collaborative rain, Hail and Snow Network (CoCoRaHS), more than 6 inches of rain fell across all parts of Archuleta County fromย  Oct. 22 through Oct. 26. The highest report was 6.92 inches in the eastern part of the county. A total of 6.55 inches fell south of Pagosa Springs, and 6.56 inches fell near Hatcher Lake. Totals in town ranged from 5.18 inches to 5.83 inches. Higher elevations received snowfall during that time, with Wolf Creek Ski Area reporting 20 inches of fresh snow. According to CoCoRaHS, parts of Archuleta County have received anywhere from 7.52 inches to 10.06 inches of total rainfall from Oct. 1 through Oct. 28. The October rainfall average for Pagosa Springs is 2.27 inches…

[Harris] also provided more information on estimated damage costs, indicating that the town is facing approximately $38 million in damage as of now, compared to $6 million in damage from last yearโ€™s floods. Harris also explained that the townโ€™s sewer system is expected to have about $9 million in damage including everything from a missing pipe on the 1st Street bridge and multiple lift stations. He noted that those lift station facilities were not able to keep up with the flood waters.

Map of the San Juan River, a tributary of the Colorado River, in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah, USA. Made using USGS National Map data. By Shannon1 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47456307

Arizona’s lifeline to the Colorado River is drying up. Its designers warned us decades ago — KJZZ.org

Photo credit: Central Arizona Project

Click the link to read the article on the KJZZ website (Alex Hager). Here’s an excerpt:

October 28, 2026

…this tense moment and this 21st century crisis are not showing up as a complete surprise. In fact, the architects of that canal system gave explicit warnings that its position near the front of the line for cutbacks would mean lower flows in the future. The warnings they issued in the 1960s appear to have been largely ignored in the decades since, and the fingerprints of their ambition are still shaping the headlines of today…Phoenix and Tucson as we know them today wouldn’t exist without a gravity-defying, 336-mile system of canals, pipelines and pumping plants that cut through the desert, collectively known as the Central Arizona Project, or CAP. Today, water shortages threaten the expensive, improbable system, and a series of warnings about the canal’s future from the 1960s, seem prescient.

How does dedicated water reach Great Salt Lake?

Fresh as the microplastic-laden Sierra snow: Scientists quantify exact amounts, types of plastics in snowfall — Jules Bernstein (University of #California, Riverside)

Photo credit: Sonya Maple/CDFW

Click the link to read the release on the UC Riverside website (Jules Bernstein):

October 28, 2026

For the first time, UC Riverside scientists have measured how much microplastic pollution falls on the Sierra Nevada during snowstorms and were surprised to find significant amounts even in the most remote locations.

Toxicologist Aleksandra Karapetrova sampling snow in the Sierra Nevada, measuring microplastics. (Sonya Maple/CDFW)

Lead researcher Aleksandra Karapetrova, a UCR environmental toxicologist, could not access any of the snowfall collection sites by car or even on foot. She expected plastic to be harder to find or even nonexistent in at least a few of these locations, given their distance from human activity.

“One site was accessed by chairlift. I had to ski to the rest of the remote sites. Thatโ€™s how isolated they are,โ€ Karapetrova said. โ€œBut no matter how far out the site, I always found microplastics there.โ€

Details about the particles, the seven locations at which they were collected, and the method used to verify their chemical properties are described in the journal Environmental Science and Technology.

Though the study did not determine how much plastic ultimately reaches drinking water, the findings have significance beyond the mountain, as the Sierra Nevada snowpack supplies about 30% of Californiaโ€™s freshwater.

The study also describes how snow scavenges airborne plastic from the atmosphere and carries it to the ground, far from population centers and places where the plastic is produced or used.

Microplastics enter the air when plastic products shed fibers or wear down into small fragments. Clothing can emit fibers directly into the atmosphere, including through dryer vents or just daily wear, while wind lifts particles from the ground and transports them elsewhere.

As snowflakes fall, they collect some of these tiny plastic particles suspended in the air. This process, called scavenging, helps explain why researchers measured substantially more plastic arriving with the falling snow than during dry weather.

Flow chart depicting the process by which microplastics get into the atmosphere and snowfall. (Aleksandra Karapetrova/UCR)

“We are at a point where microplastics are in our atmosphere, not just the ocean, not just rivers. It comes down with the snowfall, making its way to places humans typically donโ€™t go,โ€ Karapetrova said.

At remote sampling locations, during the height of the storm, the snow deposited between 270 and 3,200 plastic particles per square meter, per day. At one site in the Mammoth Mountain ski area, the amount of pollution was roughly three times that found in remote sites. Between 2,600 and 7,500 particles per square meter per day there deposited in the snow. Nearby human activity and greater snowfall accumulation there are possible explanations.

โ€œI didnโ€™t think the plastics would stay suspended so much in the town,โ€ Karapetrova said.

Even the large particle counts at Mammoth represent small amounts of material. At the highest estimated rate, snowfall over an acre would deliver about 1.5 grams of plastic per day.

To explore where the plastics may have originated, the researchers traced masses of air that ushered in the storms sampled in the study. Most of the storm air passed over Fresno and Madera counties, suggesting the Central Valley may be a region contributing these particles.

Computer models could not identify exact sources or exclude plastic arriving in the Sierra from even farther away.

The snow appears pristine, but analysis paints a different picture. (Sonya Maple/CDFW)

Earlier research had already established that microplastics occur in Western U.S. snow. This study examined how much is being deposited on the ground during individual storms, allowing researchers to connect measurements with particular weather events.

Confirming the particlesโ€™ identities required more than looking through a microscope. Researchers used infrared light to read chemical signatures, then compared those signatures with a reference library to distinguish plastic from soil and plant material.

Most commonly, the researchers found polyethylene, polypropylene, and polyester/PET, which are plastics commonly used in clothing and packaging. The team also found cellulose derivatives, a group of chemically modified, plant-based materials used in consumer products.

This study did not assess health effects of microplastics in the environment. However, some chemicals used in plastics have documented health effects including hormone disruption, inflammation, and cellular damage.

The particlesโ€™ familiar ingredients point to the reach of everyday plastic use far beyond the products themselves.

โ€œWeโ€™ve reached a point where plastic pollution is falling out of the sky every day, across this entire region, even when it isnโ€™t snowing,โ€ Karapetrova said.

Shaded relief map of the US via Learner.org