#Denver Water #snowpack and water supply update: March 16, 2026, snowpack update for Denver Waterโ€™s collection area — News on Tap #SouthPlatteRiver #ColoradoRiver

Click the link to read the article on the Denver Water website:

March 16, 2026


Esta historia estรก disponible en espaรฑol a continuaciรณn.


Denver Water depends on mountain snowpack for 90% of its water supply, which serves 1.5 million people in Denver and surrounding suburbs. 

Snowpack as of March 16, 2026, was at or near record lows: The Colorado River Basin within Denver Waterโ€™s collection system was at 71% of normal. The South Platte River Basin within Denver Waterโ€™s collection area was 54% of normal. In Denver Waterโ€™s decades of records for its watershed collection areas, as of March 16, Colorado River snowpack ranked the third-worst on record, and the South Platte River snowpack remains ranked at the worst.

No matter what, Denver Waterโ€™s annual summer watering rules will always be in place during the irrigation season. And, it is likely that we will need to implement additional drought response measures this year. Denver Waterโ€™s response to drought conditions uses a layered approach, including the potential for additional watering restrictions, in order to preserve water supplies. Denver Water is developing recommendations on a potential drought response for the Board of Water Commissioners to consider over the next several weeks. 

Since 2000, Denver Waterโ€™s response to dry conditions in previous years included issuing a Drought Watch (voluntary restrictions) in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2012 and 2013. In some of those years (2002, 2003, 2004, 2013), Denver Water levied additional drought restrictions as part of declaring a Stage 1 level response, which required mandatory reductions in outdoor water use. 


Denver Water snowpack update for March 16, 2026 

  • Conditions remain highly concerning. Poor snowfall combined with warm temperatures have left us roughly 3 feet to 4 feet of snow short of where weโ€™d prefer to be in the Denver Water collection area at this time. To reach the normal spring snowpack peak, which typically occurs in April, we need to see an additional 7 feet to 7.5 feet of snow this spring.
  • Reservoir storage conditions are below average, but in reasonably good shape: as of March 16, 2026, the reservoirs were 80% full versus an average of 85% full for this time. Those levels are also temporarily affected by the need to keep Gross Reservoir low duringย construction to raise the dam, a project designed to increase the storage capacity of the reservoir.ย 
  • Denver Water has been here several times over roughly 50 years of reliable records. On the positive side, we have experienced years that started dry and conditions dramatically improved in March, April and May. This year, however, we are running out of time to build the snowpack.
  • Weโ€™re reminding customers to do their part byย making water-efficient upgrades, inside and outside, including rethinking their yards. These steps preserve water supplies and create moreย adaptable and drought-resilient landscapesย that fit naturally into our climate.ย 
  • No matter what, Denver Waterโ€™sย annual summer watering rulesย will always be in place during the irrigation season.ย Additional drought restrictions, voluntary or mandatory, will depend in part on how the rest of the snow season shapes up and will be aimed at preserving water supplies in case this unusually dry stretch deepens into a multiyear drought. ย 

Comment from Greg Fisher, Denver Water’s manager of demand planning:ย 

โ€œAnother weekend snowstorm was welcome, though it mainly benefited lower elevations along the Front Range. Unfortunately, mountain regions didnโ€™t receive significant snow. The good news is that moisture we get in the Denver region should give our yards and landscapes a good dose of moisture, limiting the need for any watering this week,โ€ said Greg Fisher, Denver Water’s manager of demand planning.

โ€œOverall, weโ€™ve had an extremely dry winter, and that continues this week โ€” the last week of winter โ€” with unusually warm temperatures expected across the region. That could lead to snow melt even at high elevations and highlights the need to conserve water and limit the pull on our reservoir storage. We continue to emphasize the need to keep irrigation systems off until mid-to-late May at the earliest, and to be prepared for outdoor watering restrictions this spring.

โ€œItโ€™s a good time to consider landscape changes to your yard, with plants and grasses that require far less water and are far more adapted to Coloradoโ€™s dry stretches. Such landscapes, once established, can get through dry stretches like this far easier, and with far less water, and still give your yard a colorful and vibrant look.โ€

Denver Water has many resources for homeowners looking for inspiration and information about landscapes that fit naturally into our dry climate. Click here forย conservation and efficiency tipsย for outdoor irrigation and toย get more details on ways to ColoradoScapeย your property, including through rebates for turf removal and a DIY guide for landscape changes, among many other potential water-saving steps.ย 


This chart shows the cumulative snowpack on March 16, 2026, in the area of the Colorado River Basin where Denver Water captures its water supply. The snowpack is 71% of normal, which ranks third-lowest on record for March 16. Image credit: Denver Water.
This chart shows the cumulative snowpack on March 16, 2026, in the area of the South Platte River Basin where Denver Water captures its water supply. The snowpack is 54% of normal, which ranks as the lowest on record for March 16. Image credit: Denver Water.

To learn more about the work Denver Water employees do to monitor the snowpack, read this TAP story about Denver Water employees snowshoeing into the forest near the top of Vail Pass in late February 2026 to conduct a monthly โ€œsnow survey.โ€

Additional information on Denver Waterโ€™s drought planning can be found here. Additional information on Denver Water reservoir levels, customer water use and snowpack can be found in the Water Watch Report, which is updated regularly during winter, spring and summer.


Novedades de Denver Water sobre el deshielo de la montaรฑa y el suministro de agua

Novedades sobre el deshielo de la montaรฑa del 16 de marzo de 2026 para el รกrea de recolecciรณn de agua de Denver Water.


16 de marzo de 2026 | Escrito por: ย Personal de TAP


Denver Water depende del deshielo de la montaรฑa para el 90โ€ฏ% de su suministro de agua, el cual da servicio a 1.5โ€ฏmillones de personas en Denver y en los suburbios de alrededor.

En 16 de marzo de 2026, el deshielo de la montaรฑa se encontraba cerca de niveles histรณricamente bajos: La cuenca del rรญo Colorado dentro del sistema de recolecciรณn de Denver Water estaba al 71โ€ฏ% de lo normal. La cuenca del rรญo South Platte dentro del รกrea de recolecciรณn de agua de Denver Water estaba al 54โ€ฏ% de lo normal. En las dรฉcadas de registros de Denver Water sobre sus cuencas hidrogrรกficas de recolecciรณn, al 16 de marzo el deshielo de la montaรฑa en la cuenca del rรญo Colorado ocupaba el tercer peor lugar y el deshielo de la montaรฑa en la cuenca del rรญo South Platte ocupaba el peor de todos.

Pase lo que pase, lasโ€ฏreglas anuales de riego en veranoโ€ฏde Denver Water siempre estarรกn vigentes durante la temporada de riego.โ€ฏAdemรกs, es probable que este aรฑo sea necesario implementar medidas adicionales de respuesta ante una sequรญa. La respuesta de Denver Water a condiciones de sequรญa utiliza un enfoque por niveles, que incluye la posibilidad de aplicar restricciones adicionales de riego para preservar el suministro de agua.  

Denver Water estรก preparando recomendaciones para la Junta de Comisionados del Agua de Denver sobre una posible respuesta a la sequรญa en las siguientes semanas.

Desde 2000, la respuesta de Denver Water a condiciones secas en aรฑos anteriores incluyรณ la emisiรณn de una alerta de sequรญa (restricciones voluntarias) en 2002, 2003, 2004, 2012 y 2013. En algunos de esos aรฑos (2002, 2003, 2004 y 2013), Denver Water impuso restricciones adicionales por sequรญa como parte de la declaraciรณn de una respuesta de Nivelโ€ฏ1, la cual exigรญa reducciones obligatorias en el uso de agua en exteriores.

Novedades sobre el deshielo de la montaรฑa de Denver Water al 16 de marzo de 2026

  • Las condiciones siguen siendo motivo de gran preocupaciรณn. Las escasas nevadas, combinadas con temperaturas cรกlidas, han dejado aproximadamente entre 3 y 4โ€ฏpies de nieve por debajo de lo que serรญa deseable en el รกrea de recolecciรณn de Denver Water para esta รฉpoca. ย Para alcanzar el pico normal de deshielo de la montaรฑa en primavera, que por lo general se produce en abril, necesitamos ver entre 7 y 7.5โ€ฏpies adicionales de nieve esta primavera.
  • Las condiciones de almacenamiento en los embalses estรกn por debajo del promedio, pero razonablemente en buen estado: al 16 de marzo de 2026, los embalses estaban llenos al 80โ€ฏ%, frente a un promedio del 85โ€ฏ% para esta รฉpoca. Estos niveles tambiรฉn se ven afectados temporalmente por la necesidad de mantener bajo el nivel del embalse Gross durante laโ€ฏconstrucciรณn para elevar la presa, un proyecto diseรฑado para aumentar la capacidad de almacenamiento del embalse.โ€ฏ
  • Recordamos a los clientes que tambiรฉn puedenย colaborarโ€ฏrealizando mejoras para un uso eficiente del agua, tanto dentro como fuera del hogar, incluyendo replantear el diseรฑo del patio. Estas medidas ayudan a preservar el suministro de agua y crean paisajes mรกsโ€ฏadaptables y resilientes frente a la sequรญa, que se integran de forma natural en nuestro clima.โ€ฏ
  • Pase lo que pase, lasโ€ฏreglas anuales de riego en veranoโ€ฏde Denver Water siempre estarรกn vigentes durante la temporada de riego.โ€ฏLas restricciones adicionales por sequรญa, voluntarias u obligatorias, dependerรกn en parte de cรณmo evolucione el resto de la temporada de nieve y estarรกn orientadas a preservar el suministro de agua en caso de que este perรญodo inusualmente seco se convierta en una sequรญa de varios aรฑos.

Comentario de Greg Fisher, gerente de planificaciรณn de la demanda de Denverโ€ฏWater:

“Le dimos la bienvenida a otra tormenta invernal este pasado fin de semana, aunque solo beneficiaron รกreas con elevaciรณn bajas en el Front Range. Desafortunadamente, las regiones montaรฑosas no recibieron cantidades de nieve significativas. Las buenas noticias es que la humedad que recibimos en la regiรณn de Denver le dio a nuestros jardines y paisajismos una buena dosis de humedad y asรญ limitar el riego esta semana.

“Hemos tenido un invierno muy seco y estas condiciones continuaran esta semana, la รบltima semana de invierno, con temperaturas inusualmente altas anticipadas a travรฉs de la regiรณn. Continuamos enfatizando la importancia de mantener sus sistemas de riego apagados hasta mediados o finales de mayo y estar preparados para posibles restricciones de riego esta primavera.”

Denver Water cuenta con muchos recursos para propietarios de viviendas que buscan inspiraciรณn e informaciรณn sobre paisajes que se integren de forma natural en nuestro clima seco. Haga clic aquรญ paraโ€ฏobtener consejos de conservaciรณn y eficienciaโ€ฏpara el riego exterior yโ€ฏconocer mรกs detalles sobre maneras de aplicar ColoradoScapesโ€ฏen su propiedad, lo que incluye reembolsos por la eliminaciรณn de cรฉsped y una guรญa para realizar cambios en el paisajismo por cuenta propia, entre muchas otras medidas para ahorrar agua.

Puede encontrar informaciรณn adicional sobre laโ€ฏplanificaciรณn ante sequรญas de Denver Water aquรญ (en inglรฉs). Puede encontrar informaciรณn adicional sobre los niveles de los embalses de Denver Water, el uso de agua de los clientes y el deshielo de la montaรฑa en el informeโ€ฏWater Watch Report (en inglรฉs), que se actualiza con regularidad durante el invierno, la primavera y el verano.

Denver Water’s entire collection system. Image credit: Denver Water.

#Drought cueing #Aurora water restrictions in April, possibly dire limits this summer: โ€œThis is not a good situation this year at all,โ€ Marshall Brown said — Aurora Sentinel #SouthPlatteRiver #ColoradoRiver #ArkansasRiver

West Drought Monitor map March 17, 2026.

Click the link to read the article on the Aurora Sentinel website. Here’s an excerpt:

March 19, 2026

City water officials are sounding increasingly urgent alarms about Auroraโ€™s water supply, warning that worsening drought conditions and poor snowpack could force early and potentially escalating restrictions this year. Aurora Water General Manager Marshall Brown told city leaders yesterday that the situation has deteriorated enough that staff will likely recommend a formal Stage 1 drought declaration as early as April 6, nearly a month ahead of the cityโ€™s typical seasonal watering restrictions. If approved by the City Council, new limits on water use would take effect April 7, officials said.

โ€œOur water supply situation is actually bleak enough that, if things donโ€™t improve, and we donโ€™t get a community response that we need during a Stage 1 restriction, the forecast indicates we may be in a Stage 2 restriction by the end of the year,โ€ Brown said. โ€œThat would be really dramatic.โ€

Aurora breaks water supply and restrictions into four categories:

  • Normal: Current permanent rules limit landscape irrigation from 10 a.m. โ€“ 6 p.m. for a maximum of three days per week.
  • Stage I: Considered when reservoir levels are lower, often reducing outdoor irrigation to two days per week.
  • Stage II: More stringent, potentially reducing irrigation to one day per week.
  • Stage III: Emergency conditions with severe restrictions, including no landscape irrigation.

The warningย marks a notable shift from just weeks ago, when city leaders said conditions were concerning but not yet dire. Now, officials say a combination of record warmth, minimal precipitation and dwindling snowpack has pushed the system closer to critical thresholds. According to the latest Aurora Water report, conditions across Colorado remain deeply dry. More than 75% of the state is classified as abnormally dry, with over half in moderate drought and significant portions in severe to extreme drought. February and March so far have offered little relief, statewide water officials reported. Those trends are expected to continue. Long-range forecasts from federal agencies indicate warmer and drier-than-normal conditions through the spring, further reducing the likelihood of meaningful runoff to replenish reservoirs.

The latest Seasonal Outlooks through June 30, 2026 are hot off the presses from the #Climate Prediction Center: Ruh-Roh!

Resolution Copper to start drilling at Oak Flat after court decision — AZCentral.com

Henry Muรฑoz, a former miner and resident of Superior, Arizona, overlooks a portion of Oak Flatโ€”part of Tonto National Forest and a sacred site for the San Carlos Apache. Credit: Wyatt Myskow/Inside Climate News

Click the link to read the article on the AZCentral website (Debra Utacia Krol). Here’s an excerpt:

March 16, 2026

Key Points

  • A U.S. Court of Appeals denied a request to halt a land exchange at Oak Flat, clearing the way for mining work to begin.
  • Resolution Copper now owns the land, which is sacred to the Apache people, and plans to begin exploratory drilling.
  • Opponents, including the San Carlos Apache Tribe, have appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, citing religious freedom.

Resolution Copper told the U.S. Supreme Court it would begin exploratory drilling in the Oak Flat area on March 16 after the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals turned down a bid from a coalition of environmentalists, the San Carlos Apache Tribe and a group of Apache women to halt a contentious land exchange. The three-judge panelย issued its decisionย late Friday, March 13. Resolutionย relayed documentsย to the high court affirming the land exchange occurred shortly after the court rendered its decision. Resolution now owns Oak Flat, a location sacred to the Apaches and other Native people. The Forest Service issued theย final record of decisionย March 16 finalizing the land exchange.

โ€œThe national security of America depends on our ability to harness the abundant natural resources we are blessed with in this country,” said Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins in a statement. “The Resolution Copper project is a prime example of bureaucratic and legal chokeholds preventing our rural communities, supply chains, and defense industry from producing the minerals we need right here in America.โ€

The appeals court denied an injunction in three cases, blocking a legal move that could have halted progress on the handover of the 2,200-acre site and another 211 acres currently within Tonto National Forest to Resolution, the British-Australian mining company, while the lawsuits continue to make their way through the court system. Miles Coleman, one of the attorneys representing the Brown-Lopez family and other Apache women, said the firm filed anย appealย with the U.S. Supreme Court over the weekend.

“The transfer and destruction of Oak Flat would be a tragic departure from our nationโ€™s founding promise of religious freedom,” Coleman told The Arizona Republic. He said the emergency application with the Supreme Court asked to preserve the status quo and protect Oak Flat.

The ruling came more than two months after the judges heard the three cases on Jan. 8. The judges turned the three down because they said the cases were “unlikely to succeed on the merits.”

A shrinking #ColoradoRiver is forcing farms to change: From low-flow nozzles to baling hay at night, see how farmers are adapting to less water — Caitlin Ochs (High Country News) #COriver #aridification

Lamar Fields, a tribal member, gathers blue corn to sample. With increasingly unreliable access to water, flexible crops like corn have become integral to the farmโ€™s survival. To increase revenue, the farm built a mill to process crops like blue corn. Caitlin Ochs

Click the link to read the article on the High Country News website (Caitlin Ochs):

March 12, 2026

For a century, the Colorado River has been managed in pieces. Legally and politically, itโ€™s divided into two basins, with each state and community focused on securing its respective water supply. But that is not how a river functions. The Colorado River is an interconnected system, sustained by Rocky Mountain snowpack, rainfall and groundwater.

It is fragile, and under increasing stress. Two and a half decades into this century, the river that built the modern West has 20% less water flowing through it than it did on average in the last century. As heat and drought intensify, so do the stakes: Failure to recognize the severity of changing conditions, managing the river in parts without considering needs of the whole and inadequate planning for long-term shortages put the future of all the basin at risk.

For the last five years, I have documented how the Colorado River Basinโ€™s farmers are navigating water shortages and uncertainty amid deep political divisions about the riverโ€™s future. This project, called American Adaptation, examines three agricultural communities whose survival is threatened by a shrinking river, examining what happens to people when policies and water management struggle to keep pace with a changing climate. 

In one of the riverโ€™s northern watersheds, the Ute Mountain Farm and Ranch Enterprise is adapting its management as the water it relies on becomes less dependable. In central Arizona, farmers have returned to well water after becoming the first communities to have their supply cut off completely due to the basin-wide shortage. And in Californiaโ€™s Imperial Valley, the farms that receive the riverโ€™s largest water allocation are under growing pressure to share the burden of shortage. 

Together, their stories illustrate the stakes โ€” and rising tensions โ€” of the  current negotiations over the riverโ€™s future management. States, tribal nations and the federal government are reckoning with 100 years of developing water infrastructure based on assumptions of continuing abundance and expansion. These ideas โ€” and the legal frameworks built around them โ€” are colliding with the reality of a river with much less water than expected, raising complex questions about what the Colorado can sustain, how its water should be used and who will shoulder the necessary cuts.

The Dolores Project, located in the Dolores and San Juan River Basins in southwestern Colorado, develops water from the Dolores River for irrigation, municipal and industrial users, recreation, fish and wildlife, and hydroelectric power. It also provides vital water to the Dove Creek area, central Montezuma Valley area, and to the Towaoc area on the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservation. McPhee Dam and Reservoir is the principle storage feature of the Dolores Project which includes a system of canals, tunnels, and laterals to deliver water to over 61,000 acres of land. Photo credit: Kenny Browning/Flickr

When Water is Uncertain

On 7,600 acres painstakingly carved out of desert brush, the Ute Mountain Farm and Ranch, a tribally run enterprise of the Ute Mountain Ute nation, produces cattle, alfalfa, corn and wheat. Its operations are led by Simon Martinez, Eric Whyte and Michael Vicente, who have deep personal connections to the enterprise. Martinez helped build the dam for the reservoir that provides the farmโ€™s water, while Whyte cleared desert brush and mapped where the fields would go. Vicente, as the lead irrigator, can account for every drop of water thatโ€™s used.

In good years, the farmโ€™s circular fields flourish in brilliant green bursts. But the past decade has brought increasingly erratic access to water. Each spring, the local irrigation district announces potential cuts after assessing snowpack runoff and the available water stored in nearby McPhee Reservoir. In 2021, the farm received just 10% of its water allocation and was forced to leave 6,000 acres unplanted. In 2022, 30% of the water came in, and last year, 34%, which the farm was able to increase to 50% after leasing shares from other water users.  

To survive, they adapted. Every year, the farmโ€™s leadership creates numerous plans for different water scenarios. They have applied for grants, implemented low-flow nozzles in the irrigation system, installed small-scale hydropower generators. They joined a Land Institute pilot program to test crops that use less water. 

On a day in late May [2022] when wildfire smoke obscured the throat of an ancient volcano called Shiprock in the distance, I visited the Ute Mountain Ute farming and ranching operation in the southwestern corner of Colorado. Photo credit: Allen Best/Big Pivots

โ€œWe still havenโ€™t thrown the towel in,โ€ said Simon Martinez. โ€œNobody ever thought, when the reservoir was built, that there wouldnโ€™t be enough water to supply the farms that have been put out here. Itโ€™s not only us; itโ€™s happening all through southwestern Colorado.โ€

Low-water years leave their mark. Brush and scrub quickly reclaim unplanted fields. Employees laid off during dry years are hard to replace. During consecutive years of heat and drought, farms that rely on the basinโ€™s many smaller reservoirs become even more vulnerable. As the number of dry years grows, it is increasingly uncertain how much shortage the Ute Mountain Farm and Ranch Enterprise can sustain in the long term, despite the farmersโ€™ determination to adapt. 

โ€œWe still havenโ€™t thrown the towel in,โ€ said Simon Martinez. โ€œNobody ever thought, when the reservoir was built, that there wouldnโ€™t be enough water to supply the farms that have been put out here. Itโ€™s not only us; itโ€™s happening all through southwestern Colorado.โ€

Low-water years leave their mark. Brush and scrub quickly reclaim unplanted fields. Employees laid off during dry years are hard to replace. During consecutive years of heat and drought, farms that rely on the basinโ€™s many smaller reservoirs become even more vulnerable. As the number of dry years grows, it is increasingly uncertain how much shortage the Ute Mountain Farm and Ranch Enterprise can sustain in the long term, despite the farmersโ€™ determination to adapt. 

Arizona Rivers Map via Geology.com.

When Water Disappears

Hundreds of miles south, Will Clemens manages his uncleโ€™s 2,100-acre farm, cultivating cotton, alfalfa and Bermuda grass. Farmers in this region operate with a year-round growing season punctuated by dust storms and summer monsoons. 

In this intense environment, wells were the only water source before Colorado River water became available. Until the 1980s, farmers drew their water from deep underground, contributing to fissures, land subsidence and drying wells. The completion of the Central Arizona Project alleviated the pressure, delivering farmers cheap imported river water that was classified as lower priority and the first to be cut during shortages. Deliveries continued until 2022, when low water levels at Lake Mead triggered federal cuts, and central Arizona farms lost access. In response, Clemensโ€™ local irrigation district drilled a dozen new wells. 

Without the river, Clemens and his neighbors have seen the canalsโ€™ water drop. At times, their irrigation district will cut off water before a field is fully irrigated, or struggle to keep up with the farmersโ€™ water orders. More pressure on groundwater raises questions about what is sustainable in the future. Large parts of Arizona have no legal limits on pumping water from the ground. Even areas with legally protected groundwater have failed to meet a safe yield goal set in the 1980s to balance groundwater taken each year with naturally replenished water by 2025.

Some central Arizona farmers are selling or leasing their farmland to solar developers, as water dwindles and energy demands grow. Miles up the road from where Clemens farms, sleek black grids of solar panels gleam next to green alfalfa. For years, Arnold Burruel, Clemensโ€™ uncle, has been in talks with a solar developer about selling the land. 

โ€œIโ€™ve been asking myself: Does America really need to be in the agriculture industry?โ€ Burruel said. โ€œAmerica is not totally enamored with agriculture when it comes to pesticides, herbicides, groundwater, GMOs โ€” all of the above. We are at a crossroads. Are we going to continue to farm the way we are farming and heavily subsidize growers that canโ€™t make ends meet? Society has to come up with an answer.โ€

California uses the most water of any state in the Colorado River Basin, partly for its cities along the Pacific Coast but a substantial amount for agriculture in the Imperial Valley. Photo December 2015/Allen Best

When Water is Abundant

From above, the All American Canal forms a stark blue line, slicing through the Algodones Dunes. One of the worldโ€™s largest canals, it is fed by the Imperial Dam, which diverts up to 6.8 million gallons of water each minute from the Colorado River.

This is the only water source for 500,000 acres of Imperial Valley farmland. Farms here are protected by senior rights at low risk of cuts and receive regular releases from Lake Mead, the largest reservoir in the United States. During summer months, the sun looms over the valleyโ€™s dusty, flat horizon, and temperatures often climb above 100 degrees. Despite decades of drought and growing water shortage, water has flowed uninterrupted to the Imperial Valley. 

Fourth-generation family farmer Jack Vessey, who oversees a 10,000-acre produce operation, knows the canal system well. Growing up, he searched for places to swim on hot summer days.

โ€œWe take water seriously,โ€ said Vessey, who added sprinkler systems, which are more efficient than flood irrigation. In recent years, the Imperial Irrigation District joined other communities throughout the basin in voluntarily cutting water through 2026 in exchange for federal funds. The districtโ€™s compensation was several hundred dollars more per acre-foot than other participants. But as funding set aside for Western water by the Biden administration is drawn down, it is unclear how much will be available to pay for future voluntary cuts.

Vessey is aware of the growing pressure on the river and the valleyโ€™s farms, but he emphasizes that the community has helped with shortages and is protective of its water.

โ€œI have a responsibility for the people who work here to make sure we survive,โ€ he said. โ€œI have to be a little selfish at some point and say, โ€˜Keep giving us the water we need.โ€™ I know weโ€™ve got to do our part, but I can look in the mirror and say we are not wasting water, we are growing food people need. 

โ€œIf it wasnโ€™t for that canal coming off the Colorado River, this would just turn to desert.โ€

This project was supported by the National Geographic Societyโ€™s World Freshwater Initiative.

We welcome reader letters. Email High Country News at editor@hcn.org or submit a letter to the editor. See our letters to the editor policy.

This article appeared in theย March 2026ย print edition of the magazineย with the headlineย โ€œThe Shrinking River.โ€

Colorado River “Beginnings”. Photo: Brent Gardner-Smith/Aspen Journalism

#Colorado Water Conservation Board Invests in Critical Water Projects as Demand for Funding Remains High

Colorado Drought Monitor map March 17, 2026.

Click the link to read the release on the CWCB website:

March 19, 2026

Yesterday, at itsย March Board Meeting, the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) approved more than $13 million in funding for 48 water projects across the state through itsย Water Plan Grant andย Water Supply Reserve Fund programs, bringing the totals for the fiscal year to more than $40 million for 136 locally-driven projects across the state. These advance critical efforts to help communities be more prepared for drought and wildfires, improve water resilience, and secure Coloradoโ€™s water future.

โ€œOrganizations across the state are implementing these projects to do their part in moving Coloradoโ€™s Water Plan Partner Actions forward,โ€ said CWCB Director Lauren Ris. โ€œThese locally driven effortsโ€”from agricultural producers to municipalities to watershed groupsโ€”demonstrate a collective commitment to building a resilient, and water-wise future. The importance of this work is underscored by worsening drought conditions. We are putting efforts to protect water resources front and center.โ€

The funding reflects both the urgency of Coloradoโ€™s current water challenges and the overwhelming demand for resources. Funding requests far exceeded available dollars, highlighting the volume of high-impact projects ready for implementation across the state.

These investments are made possible through sports betting taxes in Colorado, a funding stream that continues to play a critical role in advancing Coloradoโ€™s water priorities.

โ€œThis level of demand for our Water Plan Grants shows just how much water users across Colorado rely on these investments,โ€ said Colorado Department of Natural Resources Executive Director Dan Gibbs. โ€œIt also speaks to the incredible work happening on the ground to conserve water and build more resilient systems that will serve communities and our water resources  for generations to come.โ€

Funded projects reflect key priorities of the Colorado Water Plan, including water conservation, wildfire resilience, and water storage. This includes projects focused on conserving water and improving efficiency, such as funding for new Water Efficiency Plansโ€”an essential tool for long-term water supply planningโ€”as well as initiatives like urban turf replacementresilient school landscapes with smart irrigation, and comprehensive outdoor water budgeting.

The CWCB also continues to invest in projects that help communities prepare for wildfire impacts through watershed restoration and implementation of Wildfire Ready Action Plans, helping protect critical water resources from post-fire risks.

And in Coloradoโ€™s current warm, low-snowpack water year, investments in water storage are critical. Funding this grant cycle supports projects that increase or evaluate storage capacityโ€”an essential strategy for capturing and managing water when supplies are limited. These efforts include feasibility studies and improvements to reservoirs and dams in communities across the state.

Finally, the Water Supply Reserve Fund grant investments this grant cycle includes projects such as post-fire diversion infrastructure improvements in Rio Blanco County and enhanced groundwater monitoring efforts in the South Platte Basinโ€”both of which strengthen local water resilience and inform long-term water management.

#Drought news March 19, 2026: The Sangre de Cristo Mountains and portions of the San Juan Mountains in southern #Colorado and northern #NewMexico saw widespread worsening conditions this week

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

This week, a powerful storm system crossed from the Great Plains into the Great Lakes, bringing widespread rain and thunderstorms to parts of the Midwest, and a historic blizzard to portions of the Upper Midwest, especially in northern Wisconsin and Michigan near Lake Superior. Total precipitation amounts exceeded 2 inches in a large area of the western Great Lakes, while lighter amounts, mostly 0.5-3 inches of precipitation, fell across parts of the southern and eastern Contiguous U.S. Improvements to ongoing drought and dryness occurred across large portions of the Midwest, parts of the lower Mississippi River Valley, and in the Northeast outside of northern New England. Heavy rain and, in some areas, mountain snow, fell across parts of the Northwest, locally improving drought conditions. However, significant deficits in snow still exist in many parts of the West, including the Pacific Northwest, which limited the longer-term benefits of the precipitation that fell. Much of the Southwest, and the central and southern Great Plains, missed out on precipitation, and instead dealt with a dry, warm and windy week. Precipitation deficits, and lack of snowpack in the mountains, continued to worsen amid high evaporative demand, leading to widespread worsening of abnormal dryness and drought, especially in South Dakota and Nebraska, southwest Kansas, southern Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, and parts of Oregon that missed out on precipitation. A kona low delivered heavy precipitation to all of Hawaii this week, leading to widespread 1- and local 2-category improvements to ongoing drought conditions from Molokai eastward…

High Plains

In the southern half of the High Plains region, warmer-than-normal weather continued this week amid mainly dry and frequently windy conditions. Degradation in drought conditions was widespread across Nebraska and southern parts of South Dakota. A deadly wildfire in western Nebraska, the Morrill Fire, has burned a record amount of land for Nebraska wildfires. This fire, and others across Nebraska, occurred amid weather conditions favorable for fire growth and a background of worsening drought conditions. The Great Plains of southwest Kansas and southeast Colorado also saw worsening drought and abnormal dryness this week, as precipitation deficits continued to mount along with warmer-than-normal temperatures this winter and early spring. Large precipitation deficits and above-normal evaporative demand over the last several months led to extreme drought development in parts of the Black Hills in southwest South Dakota. Colder temperatures and some precipitation kept conditions unchanged (and mostly free of drought or abnormal dryness) in North Dakota and northern South Dakota…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending March 17, 2026.

West

Current drought conditions in the West continued to be headlined by snow drought this week. The Sangre de Cristo Mountains and portions of the San Juan Mountains in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico saw widespread worsening conditions this week. Overall dry and warm conditions worsened both precipitation deficits and snowpack conditions in these areas. Some snow-water monitoring sites in the region have seen near-full or full melting of snowpack. Degradations to ongoing drought and dryness were also widespread in Arizona this week, where warmer-than-normal temperatures combined with dry weather to worsen short-term precipitation deficits, increase evaporative demand and support low streamflow levels. High-elevation parts of Arizona that usually have snow on the ground in mid-March are also suffering from snow drought. This combination of drier- and warmer-than-normal weather and snow drought may set the state for drought conditions to worsen in the coming weeks if weather conditions remain warm and dry. Warmer-than-normal and dry weather occurred this week in Nevada, worsening conditions in some areas, especially in the north, where impacts are being reported as a result of unusually warm and dry weather over the last several months and meagre mountain snow. Due to locally heavy precipitation or lack thereof, a mix of small-scale improvements and degradations occurred in Oregon. Amid the snow drought, localized degradations occurred in southwest Idaho, while heavier mountain snows improved snowpack in some mountain ranges in parts of western Montana, leading to localized improvements. The effectiveness of this locally renewed snowpack in improving soil moisture will be analyzed further in the weeks ahead…

South

This week, parts of east Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee benefitted from localized rains of at least 2 inches. Elsewhere, deep south Texas, western Texas, and northern and western Oklahoma were mostly dry this week. Temperatures across the region were warmer than normal, with readings varying widely from a degree or two above normal to 9-12 degrees above normal. Soil moisture levels improved and precipitation shortfalls lessened in parts of east-central Texas, Louisiana and southeast Arkansas, leading to localized improvements to drought conditions in these areas. Despite heavier rains, a small area of extreme drought shifted northeast in southeast Tennessee due to very large precipitation deficits that continued this week. Growing short-term precipitation deficits led to the development of severe drought in a small area of northwest Tennessee. Heavy rain in Dallas improved local conditions. Warm, dry and windy conditions were the rule elsewhere in the southern Great Plains and deep south Texas, leading to localized degradations in central and northern Texas, deep south Texas, south-central and northwest Oklahoma, and the Oklahoma and Texas panhandles…

Looking Ahead

Through the evening of Monday, March 23, the National Weather Service Weather Prediction Centerโ€™s forecast depicts mostly dry weather across a large swath of the Contiguous U.S. Precipitation totaling 0.5-1 inch may fall from West Virginia into New York, and in spots in New England. Similar precipitation amounts are forecast in parts of northwest Montana and the Idaho Panhandle. Western Washington is forecast to receive widespread precipitation amounts of at least 1 inch, with some favored mountainous areas forecast to receive 2.5-5 inches of precipitation (or locally more). Elsewhere, the forecast calls for precipitation amounts to remain at or below 0.5 inches, with most of the Great Plains, Mississippi and Lower Ohio River Valleys, and the Gulf Coast states likely to remain completely dry.

Looking ahead from March 24-28, the National Weather Service Climate Prediction Center forecast strongly favors warmer-than-normal temperatures in most of the West, especially in the Southwest, and across much of the Great Plains and South. Near- or below-normal temperatures are favored from northern North Dakota eastward through the Great Lakes into much of the Northeast. Above-normal precipitation is favored in Washington, northern Oregon, the Idaho Panhandle and northwest Montana, and from northern Michigan eastward across the northern half of the Northeast. Wetter-than-normal weather is also forecast in central and southern Florida. Elsewhere in the contiguous United States, below-normal precipitation is more likely, especially from the Great Plains to Utah, Nevada, the Desert Southwest and California.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending March 17, 2026.

Data Dump: Oak Flat land swap finalized: Plus — The Monster March Melt is upon us — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org)

Mining mural on a wall in Superior, Arizona, the proposed site of Resolution Copperโ€™s massive mine. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

March 17, 2026

โ›๏ธ Mining Monitor โ›๏ธ

The U.S. Forest Service late last week completed the transfer of 2,422 acres of emory oak-studded and boulder strewn public land in central Arizona to Resolution Copper, a subsidiary of global mining corporations BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. The newly privatized land includes Chรญchสผil Biล‚ Dagoteel, or Oak Flat, a 760-acre parcel that President Dwight D. Eisenhower withdrew from mineral entry in 1955. The land transfer removes one of the biggest regulatory obstacles blocking the companyโ€™s bid to mine a massive copper deposit that lies about one mile below the surface of Oak Flat.

Some conservation groups initiallyย withheld oppositionย to the land swap because of the ecological value of the land Resolution was giving up, some of which lies along the San Pedro River, anย important corridor for migratory birds. In 2015 Congress passed a bill, with bipartisan support, allowing the swap to proceed. But the company and its politician enablers failed to recognize the significance of Oak Flat to the San Carlos Apache and other tribes in the regionโ€”and underestimated the fierceness of theirย resistance.

Over the ensuing decade, completion of the land exchange has been held up by legal challenges and widespread opposition from Indigenous and environmental groups. Apache Stronghold, a non-profit devoted to protecting sacred sites, took its case up the legal ladder, calling on federal courtsย to halt the land exchangeย on the grounds that privatizing and destroying Oak Flat with mining and resulting subsidence would violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Ultimately the Supreme Court refused to take up the case, and other legal challenges also were shot down by the courts.

The fight is not over, however. Shortly after the transfer was announced, a group of Apache womenย appealedย to Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan to intervene and block the exchange. Even if that fails, Resolution will still need to obtain numerous permits before it can proceed. The land exchange removes most of the project from USFS jurisdiction, leaving it in the hands of state regulators.

Because of the depth of the deposit, the mine would be underground rather than open pit, and would use the cave panel method. This may make it less visible initially, but the magnitude of the endeavor will ultimately have significant impacts on a large swath of public and private lands. As material is removed from underground, the surface will sink, or subside, creating a huge crater and destroying Chรญchสผil Biล‚ Dagoteel. Dewatering the mine workings will affect the regionโ€™s hydrology, diminishing or drying up springs and โ€œgroundwater dependent ecosystems.โ€ And the tailings pile is expected to cover thousands of acres in Dripping Springs Wash, basically filling a desert waterway with a mountain of acid-generating, metal-laden waste.

Mining, ore processing, and slurrying operations would require large amounts of additional water. The company plans to acquire at least some of that from the Central Arizona Project, which is currently facing potentially significant cutbacks due to Colorado River water shortages.

Map showing the locations of the mine and associated facilities, along with the tailings depository (the teal and gray blob on the right side, which will totally fill in the Dripping Springs Wash valley. Source: USFS EIS.

Here are some data from the Environmental Impact Statement for Alternative 6, which was chosen in the record of decision:

  • 1.8 billion metric tons: Estimated size of the copper ore deposit under Oak Flat, one of the worldโ€™s largest.
  • The subsidence crater at Oak Flat will eventually be about 1.8 miles across and between 800 and 1,115 feet deep.

  • 1.37 billion tons: Estimated volume of tailings produced over the life of the mine
  • 20 miles: Length of slurry pipeline that would carry tailings from the ore processing facility to the Dripping Springs Wash tailings depository.
  • 4,002 acres; 490 feet: Area and height of the proposed tailings depository.
  • 9,900 to 17,000: acres of soil and vegetation expected to be disturbed. The analysis notes: โ€œโ€ฆ impacts to soil health and productivity may last centuries to millennia โ€ฆ โ€
  • 377: Number of National Register of Historic Places-eligible sites directly affected by the project.
  • The project would result in the reduction ofย 13,781 acresย of livestock grazing leases andย 2,797 animal unit monthsย overย 9 allotments, andย 14 grazing-related facilitiesย (water sources) would be lost along with infrastructure at the Slash S headquarters.
  • 87,000 acre-feet: Estimated volume of water that would be pumped from the mine (dewatering) over the projectโ€™s life. (Some hydrologists have questioned this estimate, saying it is too low).
  • Dewatering would affectย 18 to 20 groundwater dependent ecosystems, i.e. springs.
  • 540,000 acre-feet:ย Estimated amount of water that would be pumped from the Desert Wellfield in the East Salt River valley for mining and processing operations over the life of the project.
  • 1,400; $149 million: Estimated number of full-time workers at the peak of the project and total annual employee compensation.


On a related note,ย Iโ€™m looking into water use at existing Arizona mines for a futureย Land Deskย dispatch. Stay tuned. And in the meantime, if yโ€™all have any good, reliable sources for this sort of information, Iโ€™d appreciate you sending it along to me.


๐Ÿฅต Aridification Watch ๐Ÿซ

Typically I wouldnโ€™t depress you all with any snowpack/water news until early April, when mountain snowpacks typically peak, and when we should have a fairly clear picture of what weโ€™re facing as far as spring runoff. But the Bureau of Reclamation released their projections for Lake Powell on Friday, and the heat wave thatโ€™s bearing down on the Southwest is threatening to melt whatever snow is still remaining. Without some cooler weather combined with big snows, a lot of areas may have already seen their peak snowpack, which would mean spring runoff is beginning now. 

Yikes! 

First, the Lake Powell projections. Notice that the probable minimum inflow (the red line) reaches 3,500 feet in July. Dam engineers really donโ€™t want it going below that level (3,510 feet would be safer). And even the green line, or the most probable inflow, would drop to that point in September. Keep in mind that these projections are often over-estimates, meaning we could hit that critical level even earlier โ€” especially given this frigginโ€™ heat wave. And yet, the general public still has no idea how the Bureau of Reclamation might handle the situation. 

One thing you can probably bet on: The Bureau will try to buoy Lake Powellโ€™s levels by drawing down the Upper Basin reservoirs that are in the Colorado River Storage Project. That would be Flaming Gorge on the Green River, Navajo Reservoir on the San Juan, and the Wayne Aspinall Unit (Blue Mesa, Crystal, and Morrow Point) on the Gunnison. This will, of course, affect recreation on those reservoirs as well as downstream irrigators.

And on to the heat wave. Here are some forecasts for the next few days.ย 


The earliest 100ยฐF day on record in Phoenix was on March 26. That record will fall this week, along with many others, Iโ€™m sure. I mean, extreme heat warnings in March? Come on! 

Then thereโ€™s the far-less blistering, but equally concerning temperatures in the mountains. Silverton, at 9,318 feet in elevation and near the headwaters of both Colorado River and Rio Grande tributaries, is looking to have a full-on March thaw โ€” even at night. Look at those lows for Wednesday through Friday: All above freezing. No bueno.

Oak Flat, Arizona features groves of Emory oak trees, canyons, and springs. This is sacred land for the San Carlos Apache tribe. Resolution Copper (Rio Tinto subsidiary) lobbied politicians to deliver this National Forest land to the company with the intent to build a destructive copper mine. By SinaguaWiki – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=98967960

Romancing the River: The Era of Conquest Part 2 — George Sibley (SibleysRivers.com) #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification #ClimateChange

Click the link to read the article on the Sibley’s Rivers website (George Sibley):

March 18, 2026

The hard news about the Colorado River since my last post here is not good; we had a storm that dropped around two feet of snow above the 8,000-foot elevation โ€“ well, maybe the 9,000-foot elevation. But that was followed by a couple weeks of ridiculously warm weather for February and early March, with more 50-degree weather forecast into the near future, and overnight lows often in the 20s, rather than down around zero. Forecasts for the runoff this year range around a third of the โ€˜historic normal,โ€™ which is an increasingly meaningless number โ€“ and dangerous too, MAGA-thinking, keeping alive the hope that eventually the Colorado River will be great again if we just wait it out, or close our eyes and wish real hard, with real violence toward realistsโ€ฆ.

The Bureau bases its โ€˜averagesโ€™ on the recent 30-year average going by decades โ€“ so now the โ€˜long-term averageโ€™ is based on 1991-2020. Back as recently as 2019, it was based on the average from 1981-2010, which was more than a million acre-feet per year higher than the current 30-year average. God help us when weโ€™re figuring in the decade of the 2020s into a 2001-2030 average โ€“ the new average would probably make this years runoff look better than it looks by the 1991-2020 average, but thereโ€™s certainly an element of delusion in that.

The โ€˜soft newsโ€™ about the Colorado River recently has been a declaration of โ€˜personhoodโ€™ for the river by the Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT). This is a lovely gesture by people who have been struggling for โ€˜personhoodโ€™ themselves for 150 years in the riverโ€™s region, and still are not quite at the table in negotiating over the riverโ€™s future, even though they have โ€˜usedโ€™ the river, often in fairly โ€˜civilizedโ€™ ways, for many hundreds if not thousands of years more than the white masters of the river.

But it seemed naive (or maybe just cynical) for the โ€˜lamestream mediaโ€™ to ask if this declaration of personhood was going to โ€˜help save the river.โ€™ We probably need to face the fact that, until we get serious about slowing down the warming of the planet, we can do nothing by way of nomenclatter to โ€˜help save the riverโ€™ โ€“ and even then, the best we could do would be to maintain the river where it is now, or at least not a whole lot worse โ€“ which is whatโ€™s going to happen if every year we continue to put more new greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than we did the year before. I do not see how considering the river a โ€˜personโ€™ is going to change that much.

I think we should also consider that granting โ€˜personhoodโ€™ to another set of  living ecosystems might be kind of anthropocentric. I can barely contemplate what goes into โ€˜riverhood,โ€™ for example, but watching a stream one sees a system very much engaged in interaction with its whole neighborhood โ€“ giving water to the surrounding land when the landโ€™s water table is low, and taking on water the land canโ€™t hold when it is wet. โ€˜Riverhood,โ€™ I infer, has aspects of sharing, giving and receiving, that might have things to teach us about improving โ€˜personhood,โ€™ rather than operating on the assumption that all life on the planet would love to be reduced to โ€˜personhoodโ€™โ€ฆ. Just thinking out loud, sorry.

ten tribes
Graphic via Holly McClelland/High Country News.

Our real question today is whether we can โ€˜save the river systemโ€™ โ€“ the structure for storage and distribution we have laid over the river โ€“ a question with which we need to actually spend some constructive time. And that kind of leads into the second part of my second โ€˜eraโ€™ in updating Fred Dellenbaughโ€™s 1903 Romance of the Colorado River: the โ€˜Era of Conquest.โ€™ (First, remember, was the โ€˜Era of Exploration and Discovery.โ€™)

World War II, where I left the story last post, is a natural break in the Era of Conquering the Colorado River. Prior to World War II, we saw the Bureau do its greatest work: overseeing the construction of Hoover Dam, Imperial Dam and the All-American Canal under the Boulder Canyon Project, as well as Parker Dam to back up water for the 250-mile Colorado River Aqueduct to the West Coast cities. It is hard not to call it a masterpiece of regional urban-industrial development. In our six or eight thousand-year history of humans trying to create โ€˜civilizationsโ€™ to constructively deal with exploding populations, the Boulder Canyon Act stands tall as a public work, fitting for a state struggling to become a mass-society democracy (possible?) rather than putting people to work on massive tombs for the self-proclaimed โ€˜God of the Sunโ€™ or maybe โ€˜The Son of God.โ€™

Advocates for private-sector industry will be quick to say it could not have been done without the private contractors, โ€˜the Six Companiesโ€™ and most notably Henry J. Kaiser. Critics of private-sector industry will be as quick to say that the private sector has not produced very many large-scale industrial organizers like Henry J โ€“ who demonstrated than you can do big work and also take good care of the people doing it. He did not rest on his laurels but capitalized on that regional system with his Fontana steel and aluminum plants and Liberty Shipyards up the West Coast.

Green Mountain Reservoir, on the Blue River between Kremmling and and Silverthorne, was built for Western Slope interests. Photo/Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District via The Mountain Town News.

The war effort cut off most domestic development โ€“ but the Bureau of Reclamation did complete two dams on the Colorado River during the war years. One was the Green Mountain Dam and Powerplant on the Blue River high in the riverโ€™s headwaters, part of the equally massive Colorado-Big Thompson Project. More about this in the next post.

The other was a modest diversion dam below Parker Dam on the Lower Colorado: Headgate Rock Dam โ€“ for the Colorado River Indian Tribes! With all the tribes in the Colorado Basin feeling โ€“ righteously โ€“ left out of river development, one might think the Bureau would make a bit of a big deal about the fact that their first Colorado River project completed after the Boulder Canyon Project was a diversion dam for irrigating Indian agriculture. Yet I can find none of the usual historical and statistic evidence in the Bureau websites about the Headgate Rock Dam, like they have for all of the other Colorado River projects, each getting its own website. Possibly this is because the operation of the dam was turned over to the Bureau of Indian Affairs Office after construction was finished.

It is, however, an interesting story. The tribes along the river were farming like Nile Valley Egyptians, planting in the new layer of silt laid down annually by the snowmelt floods, crops that needed little further irrigation. That worked until the federal Indian agents started moving Hopi and Navajo bands onto their reservation in the 1860s โ€“ the reservations truly were โ€˜concentration camps,โ€™ forcing the move to โ€˜civilizedโ€™ agriculture. This had moved the Indian agents to acquire some pumps round the turn of the century, to water land beyond the riparian floodplain. But when the gates on Hoover Dam were closed in the mid-1930s, that ended the annual snowmelt floods, also ending the traditional agricultural economy.

So the Bureau plotted out a gravity-flow diversion dam and canal in 1938, and began construction. But construction did not really accelerate until 1941, when in one of Americaโ€™s most shamefully hysteric events 17,000 Japanese-Americans were โ€˜relocatedโ€™ to the Colorado River Indian Tribes (CRIT) reservation โ€“ undeniably a concentration camp at that point, if only for the concentration of people. But that added not just a lot of hungry mouths, but a proven workforce that joined the First People in working on the Headgate Rock Diversion Dam and the canal works to carry the water.

It would be both insensitive and naive to speak of a โ€˜happy ending,โ€™ but as the interred Japanese did in many of the desert places they were sent to, their concentration camp became a very livable village system; some stayed on after the war, and today there is a memorial monument and periodic celebration commemorating the positive relationship that developed between two โ€˜unwanted peoplesโ€™ โ€“ the uprooted Japanese and the Indians who forcibly shared their homeland. A story that, for some reason, the Bureau is not interested in tellingโ€ฆ.

Meanwhile, however, the Bureau was not lying dormant. Immediately after the warโ€™s end, the Bureau released what amounted to a smorgasbord of opportunities, under the title The Colorado River: A Natural Menace Becomes a National Resource. This proposed 134 possible projects for the development of the entire river basin for human uses โ€“ cautioning that there was not enough water in the river to build them all, thereby intruding the good old all-American element of interstate competition. Fifty-eight of those proposed projects were for the Lower Basin states, but the other 88 were for the Upper Basin states. If the pre-war Colorado River development had all been about the Compactโ€™s Lower Basin states, the post-war development would begin with controlling the โ€˜natural menaceโ€™ in the Upper Basin states and putting the water to work.

The 1946 Bureau report divided the Upper Basin into three different divisions, based on the Riverโ€™s three main tributaries above the canyons: there were 33 projects for the Green River Division out of Wyoming and Colorado but flowing mostly (but not entirely) through eastern Utah; 35 projects for the โ€˜Grand Divisionโ€™ (the Upper Colorado-Gunnison Rivers, originating in Colorado but flowing into Utah (using the older name for the Upper Colorado); and 20 projects for the San Juan Division, most of whose tributary waters flowed out of Coloradoโ€™s San Juan Mountains but the river itself flowed mostly through northern New Mexico and southern Utah.

The Little Snake River is about to join the Yampa River on Oct. 8, 2020. Photo credit: Allen Best/Big Pivots

An obvious challenge lay in the absence of any coordination between those natural divisions of the Upper Basin and the geographically-irrelevant state boundaries. Every major tributary except for the Gunnison River crossed at least one state boundary. The Little Snake River in the Yampa River Basin is the extreme example, crossing the Colorado-Wyoming border seven times.

Grand River Ditch in Rocky Mountain National Park. Photo credit: Greg Hobbs

Nonetheless, the first task for the Upper Basin, before the Bureau could go to work, was to divide the use of the waters among the states in an Upper Colorado River Basin Compact. This task was made the more difficult because the state boundaries bundled the relatively water-rich Upper Colorado River Basin with other drier river basins โ€“ the Platte, Arkansas and Rio Grande rivers in Colorado, Wyoming and New Mexico; and the Great Basin in Utah. And water law โ€“ plus fervent belief in big-project technology โ€“ accommodated the notion of moving water from one river basin to another. The Grand Ditch from high on Coloradoโ€™s West Slope to the Poudre River on the East Slope was already being dug by the turn of the century. Unlike water for either agricultural or municipal uses within a basin, nothing flows back into the basin of origin from a transmountain diversion โ€“ a total depletion.

The task of dividing the use of the Upper Basin waters was also complicated by vague writing in the Colorado River Compact โ€“ Article III(d), stating that โ€˜the States of the Upper Division will noteย (sic)ย cause the flow of the river at Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 75,000,000 acre feet for any period of ten consecutive years.โ€™ Was this aย cautionย to the Upper Basin states to make sure their uses did not start cutting into the Lower Basinโ€™s shares? Or was it aย mandateย to those states to deliver that much water even if it meant cutting their own uses โ€“ essentially turning the Compact into a โ€˜senior water rightโ€™ to the Lower Basin?

This was not really foreseen as an issue in 1922, with a river that early 20th-century optimism assumed would run at around 18 million acre-feet (maf) forever. But after the drought of the 1930s and the middling flows of early 40s, plus the mid-war treaty with Mexico to deliver 1.5 maf across that border every year, it was evident to the Upper Basin state negotiators, who gathered in 1946 to work on an Upper Basin Compact, that the river might not always produce the 7.5 maf the Compact promised to them.ย Theirย preferred interpretation of the Compactโ€™s Article III(d) would obviously be the โ€˜cautionaryโ€™ interpretation โ€“ donโ€™t be the cause of the river flow declining. But they also knew that California and Arizona would interpret it as a โ€˜mandateโ€™ โ€“ and since Congress would have to ratify their Compact, they chose to not โ€˜waken the bear,โ€™ as Californiaโ€™s current governor would put it.

So rather than dividing the use of the Upper Riverโ€™s hoped-for allotment of 7.5 maf in four set figures, like the Lower Basin has, they chose to divide it into percentages: 51.75% for Colorado (which provides around 70% of the riverโ€™s water), 23% for Utah, 13% for Wyoming, and 11.25% for New Mexico. They also chose to calculate their usage by their depletions of a streamโ€™s flow rather than adding up consumptive uses, as the Lower Basin does. I will not pretend to know exactly how this works โ€“ except to note that a measure of depletions by users also includes evaporation and transpiration, while the Lower Basinโ€™s measures allows such considerations to get lost in their calculations of usage. (The Bureau calculates Lower Basin evaporation and transpiration on a separate spreadsheet from recorded uses.)

Meanwhile, however -โ€ฆ  Donโ€™t you just love it when a writer intrudes โ€˜Meanwhile, howeverโ€™ into an already complicated mess?  This is my secondmeanwhile in this post, so it is probably time to give you a break, with only a teaser about the next step in this growing ganglia of complexity.

While the still somewhat beloved Bureau of Reclamation, creator of Hoover Dam and the New West, was just cranking up the mill for the development of the rest of the Colorado River Basin waters, the Upper Basin states had already been working out their separate peace over the transmountain diversion issue between the wet Colorado River basins of origin with low populations, and drier basins of destination with large populations across the mountains. This is a story that goes back to the 1930s, with the โ€˜New Dealโ€™ federal government putting out large amounts of funding for public projects in all the states โ€“ but with the caveat that for any state to tap into that funding, theย wholeย state had to want the projectโ€ฆ. Stay tuned for the next thrilling episode in The Westโ€™s Romance with Conquest.

Colorado transmountain diversions via the State Engineer’s office

What other nations are doing to restore their rivers

by Robert Marcos

Nations around the world are restoring their over-taxed river systems by establishing basinโ€‘wide flow targets, by reserving large quantities of water to maintain riverine environments, by making major cuts in consumptive use, and by removing man-made infrastructure that impeded the natural flow of water.

Australiaโ€™s response to the “Millennium Drought” is often cited as a blueprint for the recovery of America’s Colorado River. The Water Act 2007 was Australia’s primary federal legislation for managing the Murrayโ€“Darling Basin. Enacted during the Millennium Drought, it shifted water management from a state-by-state approach to a centralized federal framework to ensure long-term water security and environmental sustainability.

Australia’s Water Act 2007 included –

Water Buybacks: The government spent billions to “buy back” water entitlements from willing farmers to return them to the environment, thereby restoring river health.

Water Markets: Australia pioneered “unbundling” water from land, allowing it to be traded as a commodity. This incentivized a shift from low-value, water-heavy crops like rice to high-value ones like almonds.

Legal and remedial reforms: Basinโ€‘wide laws or plans that set enforceable extraction limits and prioritize maintaining minimum environmental flows. Explicit recognition of ecological flow requirements in allocation agreements, sometimes including reserved environmental flow shares in international draft treaties.

Reducing consumptive use: Cutting irrigation diversions and changing crop patterns or technologies so that more water remains in the channel, as highlighted for the Baakaโ€‘Darling. Using pricing, buyโ€‘backs of water rights, and efficiency programs to retire or shrink highโ€‘impact uses while compensating users.

Restoring environmental flows and reโ€‘operating infrastructure. Dedicating a defined volume of water each year as environmental water and delivering it strategically to key river reaches and wetlands.

Reโ€‘operating reservoir cascades to mimic aspects of natural flow regimes (e.g., Yellow River WSRS using coordinated reservoir releases and artificial flood waves for sediment and flow objectives).

Ecological and landโ€‘use restoration: Largeโ€‘scale reโ€‘vegetation and landโ€‘use change in upper basins to reduce erosion, improve infiltration, and stabilize hydrology. Floodplain, marsh, and wetland restoration to increase โ€œspongeโ€ capacity, store water during high flows, and sustain baseflows, as in Rhine marsh and broader European river projects.

Infrastructure removal and natureโ€‘based solutions: Removing or modifying barriers (small and large dams, weirs) to reconnect fragmented river sections, restore sediment and fish passage, and improve overall river health; the EU has set a goal to reconnect 25,000 km of rivers by 2030 through such measures.

Implementing local, lowโ€‘tech retention structures (e.g., โ€œbeaver damsโ€), to enhance groundwater recharge, moderate extremes, and empower communityโ€‘based management.

#Coloradoโ€™s dust-free snow is a bright spot in an otherwise poor winter — Shannon Mullane (Fresh Water News) #snowpack #runoff

Click the link to read the article on the Water Education Colorado website (Shannon Mullane):

March 12, 2026

An otherwise dismal snow year in Colorado has one clear upside: At least the snow that has fallen on the state isnโ€™t dusty.

Each year, storms pick up dust from across the Southwest and drop it on Coloradoโ€™s mountain snowpack, where it can hasten melting. Earlier snowmelt has ripple effects on water supplies, forecasts, irrigators and ecosystems. But this year, the snow is white and clean all the way through, at least at the test locations observed by Jeff Derryโ€™s team at the Center for Snow and Avalanche Studies.

What gives? Derry chuckled. Itโ€™s storms that bring dust โ€” and snow, he said.

โ€œWe havenโ€™t had the dust because we havenโ€™t had the storms,โ€ Derry said. โ€œThey kind of come hand in hand.โ€

Since mid-January, Colorado has experienced its lowest snowpack since 1987. The winter storms that have dumped snow on the mountains have been quickly followed by warm temperatures, leaving a relatively shallow layer of snow at higher elevations. The snowpack is scarce, if present at all, at lower elevations.

Derry, executive director of the centerโ€™s Dust-on-Snow Program, spent early March traveling around the state, digging pits in the snow, and looking for rusty, brownish layers of dust.

The programโ€™s snow monitoring sites are close to other data collection sites that are part of the federal snow telemetry, or SNOTEL, network. These stations, basically sheds outfitted with antennae and an array of scientific instruments, help track precipitation, temperature and other climate information across the West.

โ€œThis tour so far, after doing three sites, has been easy on my back,โ€ he said. โ€œSNOTEL stations arenโ€™t lying. Itโ€™s a skimpy snowpack.โ€

The dust that typically mars Coloradoโ€™s snowpack is dropped by winter storms, which carry it from arid regions in Arizona, New Mexico and Utah. Some of that dust was loosened by human actions, like overgrazing and developing land.

Dark dust layers on the snowโ€™s surface absorb more solar radiation, which causes the snow to melt faster and earlier in the season. When that happens, it changes how plants use water. They send more moisture into the air, which reduces the amount of water entering streams and rivers, according to researchers.

In some years since 2003, these dust events, as scientists call them, have blown over Colorado as early as October or November. Scientists observed 12 dust events in 2009 and in 2012, the most per year since 2003

But what Derry saw on his tour this year โ€” from Rabbit Ears Pass near Steamboat Springs to Red Mountain Pass in southwestern Colorado โ€” was a layer of white, even after a storm Friday cast a new layer of snow over much of Colorado.

Derry hoped the recent storm will help keep the snowpack from melting too early. Or, this year could offer something new, he said: A dust-free, albeit โ€œskimpy,โ€ snowpack.

But after 20 years of tracking dust-on-snow events, researchers have found that there are no seasons without dust. Derry will be watching out in March, April and May when about 80% of dust events typically happen, he said.

โ€œEven though things might be looking good now. It just takes one nasty storm to change everything. With the shallow snowpack, weโ€™ll see early melt anyway,โ€ he said. โ€œAdd some dust and it could make it even worse.โ€

An early spring melt

Derryโ€™s team started checking their snow monitoring sites seven to 10 days earlier than usual. Theyโ€™re expecting an early spring melt, Derry said.

Coloradoโ€™s statewide snowpack typically reaches its peak around April 8, although the peaks typically occur earlier or later, depending on the watershed.

The melt starts soon after. Reservoirs help pace the flow of water as it rushes out of the mountains, storing water that becomes vital to farmers and ranchers later in the summer.

Coloradoโ€™s 2026 snowpack, depicted by the black line, continues to be the lowest on record since 1987, according to federal data. The snowpack normally peaks around April 8 as marked by the green โ€œx.โ€ It is measured as the snow-water equivalent, or the amount of liquid water in snow. (Natural Resources Conservation Service, Contributed)

Dust can accelerate that melt by two to four weeks or 50 days in more extreme years. (Scientists are still trying to understand what factors cause extreme years and whether dust events can be better predicted.)

So can warmer temperatures, like the exceptional heat wave in the forecast for Colorado starting March 16. Some areas are pushing 20 degrees above normal this week and next week, according to the National Weather Service in Grand Junction.

โ€œThis heatwave may be the final nail in the coffin for any hope of snowpack recovery this season in Coloradoโ€™s Rockies and elsewhere across the West,โ€ Bouldercast Weather, a team of Denver and Boulder weather experts, said on social media Monday.

A weekend storm could bring up to 6 inches of snow to the northern Rockies in Colorado, said David Byers, a meteorologist for the weather service in Grand Junction.

The water that runs out of Coloradoโ€™s mountains serves communities in 19 states before it eventually reaches the Gulf of Mexico and the Pacific Ocean.

Not much snow translates into very little water, Derry said. That could affect fire season, forest health and water resources for everyone in all the basins that Colorado serves.

When there are too many low-snow years in a row, reservoirs can struggle to keep up their water storage. Between 2020 and 2025, Colorado has had three below-average winters, two average winters and one above-average winter, according to federal data from SNOTEL stations.

Colorado is heading into this yearโ€™s spring runoff with about 87% of its usual reservoir storage, according to federal data.

โ€œItโ€™s great not to see any dust of course,โ€ Derry said. โ€œBut itโ€™s pretty scary to see the skimpy snowpack around the state.โ€

More by Shannon Mullane

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map March 15, 2026.

The March 12, 2026 Intermountain West Climate briefing is hot off the presses from Western Water Assessment #snowpack #runoff

Click the link to read the briefing on the Western Water Assessment website:

March 12, 2025 – CO, UT, WY

Much of the region experienced its warmest February on record, and Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming ended the season with the warmest December-February on record. As temperatures were much above average throughout the region, precipitation was below to much below average for much of the region, with record-dry conditions along the Front Range, as well as pockets in southeastern Colorado and southern Wyoming. As of March 1, snow drought continues to persist as below to much below normal snow-water equivalent (SWE) was observed for Colorado, Utah, and eastern Wyoming. Seasonal streamflow volume forecasts for regional river basins are below to much below average, except in northern Wyoming where there are near to above average forecasts. Regional drought coverage increased to 76% by early March. The NOAA Seasonal Outlooks for March-May suggest below average precipitation and above average temperatures. 

Regional precipitation was below to much below average in February, particularly in northeastern Colorado, with a large pocket of less than 2% of average conditions in Denver, Arapahoe, Adams, Washington, and Weld Counties. Another large pocket of less than 2% of average conditions occurred in southeastern Colorado in Baca County. In contrast, scattered pockets of above average precipitation occurred in each state, with two large pockets of 150-200% of average precipitation in southeastern Colorado and western Wyoming. One small pocket of 200-400% of average precipitation occurred in southeastern Colorado in Kiowa and Bent Counties, and a pocket of 400-800% of average precipitation occurred in western Wyoming in Fremont County. Record-dry February precipitation occurred in many counties along the Front Range in Colorado, including Denver, Boulder, Larimer, Jefferson, Douglas, Adams, Arapahoe, Broomfield, El Paso, Weld, and Park Counties, as well as Baca County in southeastern Colorado. Record-dry conditions also occurred in Carbon and Albany Counties in southern Wyoming, and Tooele County in western Utah.

Regional temperatures were much above average to record-warm in February. Large swaths of 9 to 12ยฐF above average temperatures occurred in each state, particularly in Wyoming and Colorado, and a large pocket of 12-15ยฐF above average temperatures occurred in southwestern Wyoming. Colorado and Wyoming experienced the warmest February on record, and Utah experienced the third warmest February on record.ย All three states experienced the warmest meteorological winter (December-February) on record.ย These records are ranked by NOAA NCEI from 1895-2026.

Below to much below normal snow-water equivalent (SWE) continues in Colorado, Utah, and eastern Wyoming as of March 1. River basins with 50% or less of normal SWE include the Upper Arkansas (45%) in Colorado, and the Lower Colorado-Lake Mead (50%), Upper Colorado-Dirty Devil (47%), Escalante Desert-Sevier Lake (46%), and Lower San Juan (23%) in Utah. In contrast, western Wyoming river basins have near normal SWE, including the Snake Headwaters (96%), Upper Yellowstone (95%), Big Horn (94%), and the Upper Green (91%). Due to record-warm temperatures and below average precipitation for most of the region this winter, snow drought continues to persist.

Seasonal streamflow volume forecasts for river basins in Colorado, Utah, and southeastern Wyoming are below to much below average. Near to above average seasonal streamflow volumes are forecasted for northern Wyoming. In Colorado, seasonal streamflow forecasts suggest 45-60% of average runoff for all major river basins. Runoff in most major Utah river basins is forecasted at 35-55% of average, except for the Bear River Basin (72%). Wyoming has a mix of streamflow forecasts, with below average forecasts in the Little Snake (46%), North Platte (52%), Cheyenne (57%), Upper Green (64%), and Laramie (69%) River Basins, near average forecasts in the Tongue (93%), Wind (93%), Powder (95%), and Yellowstone (108%) River Basins, and above average forecasts in the Shoshone (113%) and Big Horn (123%) River Basins. Below average inflow is forecasted for many regional reservoirs, including Lake Powell (36%), Navajo (44%), McPhee (47%), Blue Mesa (50%), Guernsey (52%), Deer Creek (53%), Scofield (56%), Deerfield (57%), and Flaming Gorge (64%) Reservoirs.

Dry and warm conditions during February caused regional drought coverage to increase to 76% by March 3 (drought covered 63% of the region on February 3). Drought conditions especially deteriorated in Wyoming, where moderate (D1) drought coverage increased by 33%, severe (D2) drought coverage increased by 14%, and extreme (D3) drought emerged in southwestern and southeastern Wyoming. In Colorado, D2 drought coverage increased by 11%, and D3 drought coverage increased by 3%, emerging in the Denver Metro region and northwestern Colorado. Utah drought coverage remained the same, with an emergence of D3 drought in northeastern Utah.

As of mid-February, La Niรฑa conditions are declining and there is a 90% probability of transitioning to ENSO-neutral conditions during March-May. The NOAA March Precipitation Outlook suggests equal chances while the March Temperature Outlook suggests an increased probability of above average temperatures throughout the region. The NOAA Seasonal Precipitation Outlook for March-May suggests an increased probability of below average precipitation in Colorado, Utah, and southern Wyoming, and particularly in the Four Corners region. The NOAA Seasonal Temperature Outlook for March-May suggests an increased probability of above average temperatures in Colorado, Utah, and southern and western Wyoming, and particularly in southern Utah and southwestern Colorado.

Significant weather event: Extremely warm and dry winter for the Front Range.ย Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming experienced the warmest meteorological winter (December-February) on record, and Colorado and Wyoming experienced the warmest February on record. Coloradoโ€™s statewide average temperature for December-February was 33.6ยฐF, surpassing the previous record of 32.0ยฐF during the 1980-1981 winter season. Coloradoโ€™s Front Range had a particularly warm and dry February, causing extreme (D3) drought to emerge in the Denver Metro region. Denver, Adams, and Arapahoe Counties experienced their driest February on record. Denver experienced its second warmest winter on record, with an average temperature of 39.6ยฐF, just short of the 40.1ยฐF record from the 1933-1934 winter season. For context, the average winter temperature for Denver is 31.9ยฐF, which this winter season significantly exceeds. Denver also experienced its driest winter, with only 13.4 inches of snow recorded by the end of February, well below the average of about 35 inches of snow for December-February. These warm and dry conditions were due to many factors, but the persistent high-pressure ridge that stayed over the western U.S. coupled with La Niรฑa conditions was particularly notable in keeping moisture and cold temperatures out of the region.

Record high temperatures compound low-#snowpack problems: 75% of days from November to February were warmer than average — Laurine Lassalle (AspenJournalism.org)

Snowpack in the Roaring Fork Valley basin is at 65% of normal as of March 13 โ€” the lowest level recorded since the modern snowpack telemetric system started collecting data in 1981. The North Star Nature Preserve east of Aspen, typically snowcovered in March, was nearly bare on March 12. CREDIT: LAURINE LASSALLE/ASPEN JOURNALISM

Click the link to read the article on the Aspen Journalism website (Laurine Lassalle):

March 13, 2026

Temperature and precipitation data in the Roaring Fork Valley shows that most of this winter has experienced above-average temperatures with below-average precipitation, making this season one of the hottest and driest on record.

โ€œWe notice [the lack of snow] because [itโ€™s visible], but we keep on having these crazy-warm years, and at the end of the day, thatโ€™s whatโ€™s going to be the driver of change,โ€ said Adam McCurdy, forest and climate director at Aspen Center for Environmental Studies (ACES). He predicts that big snow years will return, but that the long-term warming trend will continue in a way thatโ€™s โ€œgoing to move spring runoff, itโ€™s going to change water availability even if we, say, keep the same snowpack.โ€

According to NOAAโ€™s Climate at a Glance tool, Pitkin County experienced its second warmest and 10th driest winter on record, with data going back as far as 1895, as average daily temperatures from November through February reached 26.9 degrees this winter, or four degrees above normal, behind the winter of 1906-07โ€™s record high of 27.5 degrees. The county received 6.9 inches of precipitation, including rain and snow, behind 1903-04โ€™s 3.55 inches, 1980-81โ€™s 5.16 inches and 1976-77โ€™s 5.21 inches. 

February average temperatures at the Aspen-Pitkin County Airport reached a record high this year, at 31.6 degrees Fahrenheit, which is about six degrees above normal, according to data from the local National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) station, which began collecting climate data in 1998.

Although this winterโ€™s lack of snow is striking, with measured levels reaching record lows, rising temperatures might be cause of greater concern as part of a larger trend, impacting spring runoff and local forests. Experts hope that precipitation this spring and summer can still bring the necessary moisture to mitigate current drought conditions. 

Snowpack in the Roaring Fork Valley basin is at 65% of normal as of March 13, according to SNOTEL, which is the U.S. Department of Agricultureโ€™s automated mountain weather network, and Aspen Journalismโ€™s snowpack dashboard. Itโ€™s the lowest level recorded since the modern snowpack telemetric system started collecting data in 1981. At Independence Pass, snowpack reached 56% of normal on March 13, but state climatologist Russ Schumacher told Summit Daily on March 4 that monthly hand measurements, which go back nearly a century, show that this yearโ€™s snowpack at Independence Pass was among the lowest 3% of the 88 years on record.

The SNOTEL station at McClure Pass in 2023, when snowpack held 23.6 inches of snow water equivalent on March 13, well above the 8.3 inches on March 13, 2026. CREDIT: HEATHER SACKETT/ASPEN JOURNALISM

According to a climate sensor located at the city of Aspenโ€™s water department in the Castle Creek Valley, where snowfall, temperature and precipitation data has been tracked since 1934, a total of 71.5 inches of snow fell from November through February, making this winter the driest in the past 30 years and the 12th driest on record, behind the winter of 1976-77, which received 47.5 inches of snow from November through February, and the 1980-81 season, when city records recorded 40.9 inches of snow. Itโ€™s worth noting that the station at the cityโ€™s water plant has moved locations over the years and changed its equipment in the 1980s, so comparisons using data collected before those changes may be skewed.

A total of 6 inches of precipitation, including rain and snow, fell on the Roaring Fork Valley between November and February, according to Gridded Surface Meteorological (or gridMET) data that goes back to 1979. Thatโ€™s below last yearโ€™s 8.5 inches and represents 55% of the 30-year average, making the 2025-26 winter season the second driest, after 1980-81. Although precipitation has been below average, McCurdy said wide variations in rain and snow totals year over year are expected. โ€œWhile this is an exceptionally dry winter precipitationwise, itโ€™s not outside of the range of historic variability,โ€ McCurdy said. โ€œWhat weโ€™re seeing temperaturewise is โ€ฆ certainly where weโ€™re heading and weโ€™ve seen it again and again. So I think thatโ€™s not just one data point, itโ€™s another data point in a long-term trend.โ€

While this winterโ€™s lack of snow is striking, rising temperatures might be cause of greater concern as part of a larger trend, impacting spring runoff and local forests. CREDIT: LAURINE LASSALLE/ASPEN JOURNALISM

Above-average temperatures are becoming more common

NOAAโ€™s 2018 modeling trend shows that average daily temperatures from November through February in Pitkin County have increased by 0.3 degrees every 10 years, mostly driven by rising low temperatures that have gone up by 0.5 degrees every decade. According to the 2024 Colorado Climate Change Report from the Colorado Climate Center, annual average temperatures across the state warmed by 2.3 degrees from 1980 to 2022 and are expected to keep rising due to climate change. By 2050, statewide annual temperatures are projected to increase by 2.5 to 5.5 degrees compared with 1971-2000, and between 1 degree and 4 degrees compared with 2022, under a medium-low emissions scenario.

Colorado statewide annual temperature anomaly (ยฐF) with respect to the 1901-2000 average. Graphic credit: Colorado Climate Center

โ€œColorado has warmed at a faster rate than the global average and is expected to continue to warm,โ€ Peter Goble, assistant state climatologist at Colorado State Universityโ€™s Colorado Climate Center, told Aspen Journalism. โ€œHaving said that, not every winter going forward is going to be as warm as this winter. And, in fact, I think this winter was so unusual that I think this winter will be considered a much-warmer-than-normal winter for some time to come.โ€ 

The impact of this warm and dry winter will be seen in the spring runoff as a much-lower-than-average peak runoff is to be expected, but summer conditions are still uncertain as experts hope for spring and summer precipitation that would lessen drought conditions. CREDIT: LAURINE LASSALLE/ASPEN JOURNALISM

The NOAA sensor at ASE recorded 94 days with above-average minimum temperatures out of the 120 days from November to February, and 89 days with above-average maximum temperatures, for a total of 81 days with both above-average minimum and maximum temperatures. In other words, about three-fourths of the days were warmer than normal. In comparison, November 2024-February 2025 had 54 days with above-normal temperatures.

Looking at the Roaring Fork Valley as a whole, gridMET data shows that this winter counted 92 days with above-average daily temperatures, above 2005โ€™s 85 days. The GridMET dataset from scientists at the University of California Merced combines data from weather stations in a given area and uses modeling to generate surface climate datasets instead of relying on one specific weather station. 

The data also shows that warm winters have become more frequent since the mid-1990s. According to gridMET data, which goes back to 1979, winters in the dataset in prior years with the highest number of days with above-average temperatures include 2018 and 1981, but 1981 was followed by a decade of mostly cooler temperatures and above-average precipitation. โ€œOn the other hand, 2018 and 2026 are both part of consistently hotter-than-average winters and, more recently, drier starts to the season,โ€ according toย ACES.

Although the entire state of Colorado is experiencing drought conditions, the upper Roaring Fork Valley has been experiencing โ€œexceptionalโ€ drought conditions since Dec. 23, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor, with about 28% of Pitkin County and 19% of Eagle County experiencing such conditions as of March 10. (โ€œExceptionalโ€ is the most severe level.) The Roaring Fork watershed is one of the only two places throughout the entire West to experience this level of drought. 

Colorado Drought Monitor map March 10, 2026.

โ€œOne of the main reasons that, when you look at the U.S. Drought Monitor, the Roaring Fork Valley stands out is because of the mix of both short- and long-term drought conditions in place,โ€ Goble said, adding that the Roaring Fork Valley was very hot and dry last summer, while other areas around the Colorado Rockies received some decent moisture. โ€œThe Roaring Fork Valley was already en route [to drought] going into this winter season,โ€ he said.

Average daily temperatures, or the average of high and low temperatures, in the Roaring Fork River watershed have been 5 degrees above 1991-2020 historical average this winter (November-February), surpassing the previous record year of 1981, when temperatures were 4 degrees above normal. For February, average temperatures for the Roaring Fork Valley were the fourth highest on record, at 27.6 degrees.

Maximum and minimum temperatures are getting closer

On average, maximum and minimum temperatures recorded at ASE have both been approximately 6 degrees higher than normal in February. From November through February, maximum and minimum temperatures have also been roughly 6 degrees above normal. Last winter, maximum and minimum temperatures were, on average, 1 degree below normal.

GridMET data shows that, on average, maximum and minimum temperatures are getting closer, a trend that has been particularly noticeable in the past five to six years. The gap for November through February reached an average of 19.7 degrees for the Roaring Fork Valley, the lowest reading on record. 

Rising low temperatures can affect the ability to make snow at ski resorts, as reported byAspen Journalism in 2019 and The Sopris Sun in January, while the need to rely on snowmaking to compensate for the lack of snow increases. 

McCurdy explained that snowpack maintains and accumulates โ€œcold contentโ€ during the winter and that low nighttime temperatures allow this thermal buffer to form and keep snowpack colder longer, preventing it from melting too fast. 

โ€œBefore the snow starts to rapidly melt, the snowpack needs to become isothermic; in other words, the entire [snowpack] column is about 0 degrees Celsius [32 degrees Fahrenheit] and ready to melt,โ€ he said. โ€œBecause of the warm winter [and the rising low temperatures], the snowpack is entering spring closer to isothermic, which could result in a pretty rapid melt-off.โ€

Historically, the gap between high and low temperatures averages 22.6 degrees. According to NOAA, 25.5 degrees separate high temperatures from low temperatures at ASE for this winter, lower than last yearโ€™s 26 degrees but higher than the nearly 25 degrees recorded in the winters of 2023-24 and 2022-23.

Possible impacts

โ€œThe real impact of this warm, dry weather will be seen in the spring runoff,โ€ McCurdy said, adding that a much-lower-than-average peak runoff is to be expected. 

He said most trees are dormant during the winter until spring runoff, when they pull up a lot of water to use for the rest of the summer, but if their water supply is low, theyโ€™re not going to be able to grow as much or be able to produce resins and chemical defenses to fend off things such as bark beetles and other invasive insects.

โ€œTrees have a long hydrologic memory,โ€ he said. โ€œOne year isnโ€™t as impactful to them as some other species where theyโ€™ll build up water. They have deep roots. They can pull up groundwater, but by the same token, multiple years of drought is a hard hole for them to get out of.โ€

McCurdy said the aspen population, for example, has declined and dry winters tend to negatively affect them. โ€œAssuming we donโ€™t get more precipitation, we could lose more aspens.โ€

Pitkin County experienced its second warmest and 10th driest winter on record, with data going back as far as 1895, as average daily temperatures from November through February reached 26.9 degrees this winter. A sensor on Castle Creek recorded a total of 71.5 inches of snowfall from November through February, making this winter the driest in the past 30 years. While most of the terrain on Aspen Mountain is still covered enough for skiing, some slopes have begun to melt out. CREDIT: CURTIS WACKERLE/ASPEN JOURNALISM

Goble said the lack of snow will probably lead to below-normal water supplies and impact river recreation, and it could lead to higher fire danger. Major factors that contribute to a large wildfire season in Colorado are low snowpack, early snowmelt and a hot summer. As of early March, snowpack is certainly low and early spring runoff is expected, but the severity of summer conditions is still uncertain. 

โ€œJust because things have been dry recently doesnโ€™t mean that weโ€™ll continue to be dry in summer,โ€ Goble said. โ€œLarge wildfires are not a guarantee yet at this point, but I do think that with the very low snowpack numbers that we have in place now, itโ€™s a higher probability than a normal year.โ€

Although the entire state of Colorado is experiencing drought conditions, the upper Roaring Fork Valley has been experiencing โ€œexceptionalโ€ drought conditions since Dec. 23. The Roaring Fork watershed is one of the only two places throughout the entire West to experience this level of drought. An almost snow-free south-facing hillside above the North Star Nature Preserve is shown here on March 12. CREDIT: LAURINE LASSALLE/ASPEN JOURNALISM

Although a change in the weather that would bring precipitation levels closer to average would not be unprecedented, it is also statistically unlikely.

โ€œIn our 47-year record, there is only a single year that had enough precipitation to dig us out of the hole weโ€™re currently in. In 1995, from this point in February until the end of May, there were 22 inches of precipitation; thatโ€™s about double the average precipitation that normally falls over that period,โ€ according to an ACES blog post. โ€œBased on a model of total precipitation for this period, we have a roughly 1% chance of ending the year with a normal amount of precipitation.โ€

Goble agrees that the chances to get back to normal snowpack this year are slim. โ€œWe just donโ€™t have enough winter left to make up the deficits that are already in place. It would take a record kind of mid-to-late March through April in order to get us back up to normal,โ€ he said. โ€œBut that doesnโ€™t mean that spring and summer precipitation isnโ€™t important. If we have a wet spring or and we have a wet or cooler-than-normal summer, those types of things could mitigate some of the drought impact that we might otherwise see this summer.โ€

Record heat could put #ColoradoRiver closer to crisis — Tucson.com #COriver #aridification

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2025. Note the tiny points on the annual data so that you can flyspeck the individual years. Credit: Brad Udall

Click the link to read the article on the Tucson.com website (Tony Davis). Here’s an excerpt:

March 14, 2026

The record-breaking heat in this month’s forecastย is likely to help push the Colorado River Basin to the edge of “disaster,” in which drastic cuts in water use will be necessary next year, experts say.ย  The heat is almost certain to slash river flows even more than already expected after the snowpack in key sites above Lake Powell hit record lows this winter. The upshot: Lake Powell is likely to get less than one-third the water from the river that it would in an average April to July. The unusually low flows won’t be bad enough to push the basin into immediate disaster this year. But several experts said it is virtually inevitable that major cuts in river water use will be needed next year in Arizona and other Western states โ€” unless the winter of 2026-27 is far cooler and wetter than the current one.

“We can survive this year, no problem. What’ll be interesting to see is if this year puts enough scare into the states to begin real serious rethinking about how we manage water,” said David Wegner, a retired U.S. Bureau of Reclamation planner and congressional staffer who now sits on a National Academy of Sciences board that reviews water issues.

The Bureau ofย Reclamation already projected, in February, that Lake Powell is likely to fall below the level at which the turbinesย at adjoining Glen Canyon Dam can generate electricityย โ€” 3,490 feetย โ€” by December 2026. Given the trend toward lower snowpack, higher temperatures and less runoff of water into the river, it’s very possible if not likely, thatย future forecasts will show the lake falling below 3,490 feet sooner than December. But most observers, including Kuhn and Wegner expect the bureau to try to forestall that possibility in advance by releasing extra water from reservoirs upstream of Lake Powell, led by Flaming Gorge reservoir at the Utah-Wyoming border. Powell is at the Arizona-Utah border.

Not looking good at all — Allen Best (BigPivots.com) #snowpack #runoff

Click the link to read the article on the Big Pivots website (Allen Best):

March 6, 2026

Might the Colorado River runoff be as bad as 2002? March could bring snow and rain. Almost certainly it will bring warm temperatures.

What if March brings temperatures suitable for flip flops in places like Steamboat, Vail and Telluride? And what if the snow that does fall on the headwaters of the Colorado River is average or less?

Things could get much more grim in the Colorado River Basin this year, conceivably as bad as 2002. That year was memorable for the pitiful runoff, the peak barely discernible in Glenwood Canyon in April and May. Worse came in June when three fires erupted at very nearly the same time.

The Hayman Fire (2002) was the stateโ€™s largest recorded wildfire. Smoke from the massive blaze could be seen and smelled across the state. Photo credit to Nathan Bobbin, Flickr Creative Commons.

Bill Owens, who was then Coloradoโ€™s governor, toured the state by plane, visiting the Hayman fire that started near Colorado Springs, the Coal Seam Fire at Glenwood Springs, and the Missionary Ridge Fire north of Durango. โ€œAll of Colorado is on fire,โ€ he said, a remark that some, concerned about impacts to tourism, derided as an overstatement. But within that statement was a certain truth.

This week, NOAAโ€™s Colorado River Basin Forecast Center released its projected flows into Lake Powell. It doesnโ€™t look pretty. Jeff Lukas, the principle at Lukas Climate Research and Consulting, assembled this graphic that shows how the projections visually compare to other years since 1991.

โ€œDespite better snowfall in February, the most probable forecast remains bleak at 36% of average,โ€ he said on LinkedIn. That, he added, would put runoff in the observed flows into Powell in 2012, 2013, 2018, 2021, and 2025. โ€œIn other words, a bad neighborhood,โ€ he said.

An unusually wet and cool March through May would only get the inflow to 65% of average. On the other hand, it could go in the other direction. A warm and dry March could eviscerate the existing snowpack.

James Eklund, a water attorney and former director of the Colorado Water Conservation Board, pointed out that the long-term average has been 6.7 million acre-feet. The March forecast projected runoff of around 2.3 million ace-feet.

Colorado transmountain diversions via the State Engineer’s office

โ€œThe river cares not about our legal arguments,โ€ he said in a LinkedIn post, a reference to the intense squabbling about how to share a river that has been rapidly diminishing in average volume in the 21st century. Even in places like Arvada, people who donโ€™t realize that they are watering their lawns and taking their showers with water imported from a Colorado River tributary do realize the Colorado River has problems.

The runoff could conceivably be worse than 2002. Thereโ€™s a big difference, though. In 2002, the reservoirs held a great deal of water. Not completely full, but within a good water year of being full. Total runoff that year was 25% of average. Most years since then have been below average, leaving water levels of Powell within striking distance of deadpool.

From his post in the Glenwood Springs area, Eric Kuhn sees March storms having potential to bump up the runoff numbers. โ€œThis is one of those years where March could make a big difference. But when I look at the outlook for three or four weeks, it looks like March will definitely be above average in temperatures, which is not good news. I think itโ€™s too soon to tell whether we will have average or below average precipitation. But warm temperatures will not be good to the snowpack.โ€ [ed. emphasis mine]

This yearโ€™s runoff will add tension to the already fraught situation in the Colorado River Basin. Kuhn, a former manager of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, said he wouldnโ€™t be surprised if the Bureau of Reclamation โ€” an agency within the Department of Interior that oversees operation of the federal dams โ€” finds it must release one million acre-feet less than the base 7.5 million acre-feet release.

This could trigger a legal fight. The Colorado River Compact imposes a requirement upon the upper Colorado River Basin states to deliver 75 million acre-feet on a rolling 10-year average. This would take the upper-basin states below that threshold.

That provision in the compact has been debated almost since Congress approved it in 1929. But, under the most aggressive interpretation by lower-basin states, this could put the upper-basin out of compliance. As such, this could be the year that puts the basin states on long road to a U.S. Supreme Court review.

A meager runoff this year will also put the Department of Interior into an uncomfortable position of having to make decisions. Kuhn says the federal agencyโ€™s water officials have traditionally tried to mediate disputes among the seven basin states. This year the agency might have to make decisions that leave people upstream and down unhappy.

โ€œThey could sit back (in former days) and say we are not going to take a position because we donโ€™t want to upset either side. We have to work with both sides. Those days have come to an end, unfortunately.โ€

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

#Snowpack news March 16, 2026

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map March 15, 2026.
Colorado snowpack basin-filled map March 15, 2026.

Note that the NRCS graphs have not updated since Saturday, March 14, 2026 and that many of the graphs are showing an early melt-out or sublimation from the warm and windy weather.

Metro #Denver cities begin enacting mandatory outdoor watering limits for spring as #drought, warmth continue — The Denver Post #snowpack

Click the link to read the article on The Denver Post website (John Aguilar). Here’s an excerpt:

March 15, 2026

Thornton is first to adopt restrictions; Denver Water, others prepare similar measures

When Thornton enacted a Stage 1 drought declaration last week, it became the first city in metro Denver to place a mandatory twice-weekly limit on outdoor watering for the upcoming hot season. But the northern suburb likely wonโ€™t be the last. Metro cities and utilities are starting to lay out various defensive strategies against what has become a crispy-dry 2026, starting with anย alarmingly warm and dry winter in Coloradoย thatโ€™s been marked byย one of the worst snowpacks in recorded state history. Denver Water, which serves 1.5 million people, could follow a similar track to Thorntonโ€™s by monthโ€™s end. Aurora Water, which is relied upon by 400,000 people, may be right behind with its own Stage 1 drought declaration in early April…Locally, that also translates to abysmal conditions in the Clear Creek basin, where Westminster gets most of its water. Last week, the Westminster City Council discussed enacting a drought watch โ€” a less severe step than a Stage 1 declaration that would rely on voluntary cutbacks.

…theย latest monthly bulletin from the National Weather Serviceย painted a grim weather picture based on conditions in Denver. Last month was the third-warmest and second-driest February in the city, while it was the least-snowiest February on record for Denver, tying 2009โ€™s equally snow-starved February…

What water managers can control sits on the demand side of the water ledger. Thornton gets the bulk of its water from the Upper South Platte River and Clear Creek watersheds, which are both at โ€œrecord low levels,โ€ according to a memo accompanying last Tuesdayโ€™s council meeting. Emily Hunt, Thorntonโ€™s interim infrastructure director, says the concern lies not so much with the summer ahead but with the summers to follow, assuming precipitation stays meager. Coloradoโ€™s sixth-largest city is presently at 83% of storage capacityย across the 19 reservoirs that hold its water. It stores a large portion of the water it consumes in Standley Lake, which is also a water source for Westminster and Northglenn.

โ€œWeโ€™re going into the summer with good storage, but with this snowpack, weโ€™re not going to be able to top off our reservoirs the way we normally would,โ€ Hunt said. โ€œWeโ€™re basically trying to keep the year in balance so that if the drought continues into next year, weโ€™ll be in pretty good shape.โ€

Colorado snowpack basin-filled map March 15, 2026.

Irrigation season to begin March 16: Warmer weather brings early increased streamflows; March opened with record-setting temperatures — AlamosaCitizen.com #RioGrande #SanLuisValley

Potato truck Carmel district March 2026. Credit: The Citizen

Click the link to read the article the Alamosa Citizen website:

March 13, 2026

An early start to the irrigation season in the San Luis Valley is coinciding with the arrival of springโ€™s first heat wave.

Craig Cotten, Division 3 engineer for Colorado Division of Water Resources, announced a staged approach to opening the water year for producers in the Upper Rio Grande Basin. 

The water season will begin on March 16 for surface and groundwater irrigators in the Conejos River area (Water District 22), the Culebra Creek area (Water District 24), the Trinchera Creek area (Water District 35) and the La Jara Creek area. The irrigation season will begin on March 23 for all surface and groundwater irrigation structures in the Rio Grande area (Water District 20).

โ€œI decided to start the irrigation season earlier than the presumptive April 1 date for many valley areas due to the very warm, dry spring and the low current snowpack. We are already seeing an increase in streamflows due to the warmer weather, and it is beneficial for water rights holders to be able to use this water while it is available,โ€ Cotten said in an email exchange with Alamosa Citizen.  [ed. emphasis mine]

On the Conejos River and Rio Grande, another reason is that Colorado is projected to meet its compact obligation without needing to deliver water during the irrigation season, Cotten said. 

โ€œIn order to avoid a significant over-delivery of water to the stateline, I have decided to begin the irrigation season on these rivers prior to April 1.โ€

The coming week of March 16 could see record-setting temperatures to the official start of spring. The forecast calls for midweek daytime highs in the low- to mid-70s. March has seen 21 of its 31 days establish new record high temperatures since 2004, a heating trend that accentuates the warming winters and spring months.

This March opened with back-to-back days of new daily high records. More heat records could fall in the coming week. The irrigation season canโ€™t open soon enough.

Upper Rio Grande SWE March 14, 2026. Note the early melt-out.
Chart showing water use trends in US and Mexico. Credit: Overconsumption gravely threatens water security in the binational Rio Grande-Bravo basin. Map via Springer Nature.

The Alfalfa Fallacy: There are no “obvious” solutions to the #ColoradoRiver crisis — Jonathan P. Thompson #COriver #aridification

Idle sprinkler system in southwestern Colorado. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

March 10, 2026

๐Ÿฅต Aridification Watch ๐Ÿซ

Oh dear. Youโ€™d best get your skiing in now, because it looks like the spring melt will hit a lot earlier than usual. A big heat wave is on its way to the West, with the most unseasonably warm temperatures occurring in the Southwest and Four Corners regions, further dimming hopes for a spring snowpack-bolstering miracle. This could mean that mountain snowpack in the Colorado River Basin has already peaked, which would be dire for streamflows. 

My apologies for bringing you more doom and gloom climate news. At least itโ€™s cold in Alaska, though.

And thatโ€™s topping off the warmest winter on record in the Upper Colorado River Basin.


โ˜˜๏ธ Annals of Alfalfa ๐Ÿ€

As the Colorado River shrinks, the โ€œsimpleโ€ and โ€œobviousโ€ solutions to the crisis seem to multiply.

You know, itโ€™s a lot of: โ€œWhatchya gotta do is โ€ฆ. โ€œ

  • โ€œโ€ฆย stop watering them golf courses.โ€
  • โ€œโ€ฆย stop population growth.โ€
  • โ€œโ€ฆย keep people from moving to deserts.โ€
  • โ€œโ€ฆ shut down dem data centers!โ€

And then, the most common one: โ€œ โ€ฆ stop raising cattle and hay in the desert.โ€

Kenny Torrella, who writes for Vox, brought up that last one on the social media platform Blue Sky recently:

While this fix holds more water (so to speak) than the preceding ones, it is not actually a solution โ€” at least not a workable one.

There is only one obvious remedy for the Colorado River crisis, and that is for its collective users to consume less of the riverโ€™s water. Since irrigating alfalfa takes up a larger share of the riverโ€™s water than any other single use, it seems to follow that growing less of the crop would leave more water in the river. But this does not account for the way water law works.

Letโ€™s imagine that California could designate alfalfa as an illicit crop and ban cultivation of it and other livestock forage crops. That would force a bunch of big farmers in the Imperial Valley โ€” home of the largest single water user on the entire river โ€” to tear up about 200,000 acres of water-guzzling alfalfa.

Problem solved? Not quite.

The Salton Sea (pictured above ) straddles the Imperial and Coachella valleys. (Source: Water Education Foundation)

The Imperial Irrigation District has senior rights to use a buttload of Colorado River water for โ€œbeneficial use,โ€ which in this case means agriculture. Specific farmers may decide that without alfalfa, theyโ€™ll simply throw in the towel and stop irrigating altogether. But thereโ€™s no way the irrigation district as a whole is going to stop diverting that water without some sort of compensation, because while farmers pay the irrigation district a negligible amount for water, the irrigation district gets it virtually for free. That means the district is incentivized to continue using all of the water to which it has rights, and rather than leaving it in the river, they would most likely sell it to another farmer growing another crop. The result: No net reduction in water consumption.

Torrellaโ€™s claim that alfalfaโ€™s water use gets โ€œalmost no air timeโ€ is a little off. Iโ€™ve written about it at least a zillion times at the Land Desk and at High Country News, but many a mainstream news outlet has done the same. Even the Paris Review had a pieceon it. The reason โ€œgrowing less alfalfaโ€ doesnโ€™t show up in talks about negotiations over the Colorado River, or as an alternative in the fedsโ€™ proposed operating plan, is not because of โ€œagricultural exceptionalism,โ€ but because these arenโ€™t crop-level negotiations.


Data Dump: The alfalfa question — Jonathan P. Thompson


The two Colorado River basins and the feds are currently looking at the macro level, and trying to hash out which basin will take what level of cuts, how those cuts will be determined, and what if anything will be done to fend off dead pool at Glen Canyon Dam. Only when all of that is settled can the individual states in each basin duke it out over respective consumption cuts, followed by the biggest users within each state. Finally, those users can make decisions about how to use their now smaller share of water, and really just about anything goes so long as it fits the definition of โ€œbeneficial use.โ€ 

Maybe theyโ€™ll continue to grow alfalfa using less water via deficit irrigation, maybe theyโ€™ll opt for a higher-value, less water-intensive crop like broccoli, maybe theyโ€™ll use it to grow cacti, but what counts is that theyโ€™ll be taking less water out of the Colorado River, regardless.

Itโ€™s not that the alfalfaphobes are wrong; it probably is a good idea to grow less alfalfa and fewer cows in the desert. For that matter, we should fallow golf courses, restrict urban growth, and take other steps to live within our means. But whatโ€™s needed now is an agreement on drastic and immediate cuts in water consumption. What that means for alfalfa or golf courses or Arizona suburbs will be dealt with later. 

Now for a little data dump re alfalfa and other irrigated crops in Imperial County, California1:

  • $238,752,000: Gross value of alfalfa hay harvested in Imperial County, California, in 2024.
  • 183,252: Harvested acres of alfalfa hay in 2024.
  • $1,300/acre: Per-acre value of alfalfa hay harvested in 2024.ย 
  • 6 acre-feet: Approximate amount of water required to irrigate one acre of alfalfa in the Imperial Valley for a year.
  • $20/acre-foot: Amount Imperial Valley farmers pay for water.
  • $134,822,000: Gross value of broccoli harvested in Imperial County in 2024.
  • $12,136/acre: Per-acre value of broccoli harvested in 2024.
  • 3 acre-feet: Approximate amount of water required to irrigate one acre of broccoli in the Imperial Valley.
  • $259,861,000: Gross value of head and leaf lettuce harvested in 2024.
  • $9,012/acre:ย Per-acre value of head and leaf lettuce harvested in 2024.ย 
  • 2-3 acre-feet:ย Approximate amount of water required to irrigate one acre of lettuce in the Imperial Valley.

๐ŸŸ Colorado River Chronicles ๐Ÿ’ง

Todayโ€™s vocabulary term is: Present Perfected Rights, a term you may be hearing a lot more of in coming months. 

Article VIII of the Colorado River Compact states:

Later, the Boulder Canyon Project Act of 1928 decreed that the โ€œdam and reservoirโ€ of the title (which would become Hoover Dam and Lake Mead) shall be used for the โ€œsatisfaction of present perfected rights โ€ฆ .โ€

Thatโ€™s fine and good, but what are present perfected rights, or PPRs? The Compact never says what that term means. In fact, it wasnโ€™t clearly defined until the Supreme Court laid it out in its 1964 Arizona v. California decision, a key document in the Law of the River:

Clear as mud, right?

Generally speaking, PPRs are the most senior rights on the Colorado River, they predate the Colorado River Compact, and are the last rights subject to curtailment in times of shortage. They are the โ€œfirstโ€ in the โ€œfirst in time, first in rightโ€ summation of the prior appropriation doctrine, which is the foundation of Western water law.

Arizona v. California goes on to say that โ€œin any year where there is fewer than 7.5 million acre-feet available for use in California, Nevada, and Arizona, the Secretary of the Interior must first supply water to the PPRs in order of priority, regardless of state lines.โ€ Similarly, the Upper Basinโ€™s PPRs will be the last to be cut if curtailments are necessary to meet its non-depletion/minimum-delivery obligation to the Lower Basin. 

The Supreme Court required the Lower Basin to submit a list of its PPRs, and here they are from the document itself as submitted in 1967. Some of these, especially the tribal rights, were updated and added to later on. 

The first set is for tribal nations in the Lower Basin only:

These are the top six non-tribal PPRs in the Lower Basin by order of size of diversion. There are many more smaller PPRs that are not listed here:


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Messing with Maps ๐Ÿงญ

Iโ€™m not sure if Iโ€™ve featured this one before, but if so, itโ€™s worth re-upping due to its heightened relevance this year. Itโ€™s the Open ET mapping tool, with ET standing for evapotranspiration. It uses satellite imagery to calculate evapotranspiration from individual fields, which is an indicator of how much irrigation is being used and what crop is being grown. Hovering over a field will bring up a chart showing ET for each month, the acreage, and the crop type. 

The screenshot below is of the Montezuma Valley between Dolores and Cortez. The fields, a vast majority of which are planted with alfalfa or other hay crops, are irrigated from the Dolores River and McPhee Reservoir. Try it out here: https://etdata.org/


1 Source: Imperial County Agricultural Commissioner

Small Navajo community confronts a 110-year expansion of a coal mine — AZCentral.com

The Navajo Mine, which supplies coal to the Four Corners Generating Station; aerial view looking west. Wikimedia Commons: User Dicklyon licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.

Click the link to read the article on the AZCentral website (Arlyssa D. Becenti). Here’s an excerpt:

March 13, 2026

Key Points

  • Residents of the Navajo community of Burnham, New Mexico, have raised concerns about the expansion of a coal mine, including its environmental impact and a lack of transparency .
  • The Navajo Transitional Energy Company has proposed expanding the Navajo Mine, potentially extending its life by 110 years.
  • Opponents question the need for a 110-year expansion, as the mine’s only customer is a power plant set to close in 2031.

Dailan Long, with his relatives and other members of the Navajo community in Burnham, New Mexico, has long worked to defend their community from coal industry efforts to expand access to the areaโ€”an ongoing struggle that has led him to ask, โ€œAre we always going to keep fighting?โ€ The latest threat is a proposed expansion of the Navajo Mine by theย Navajo Transitional Energy Company, a plan that could keep the operation running for 110 years, even though the only coal-fired power plant in the area is set to close in 2031. Long, his relative Joni Lapahie, and other community members are working to raise awareness about the proposal, which they say surfaced only recently despite assurances from their chapter administration. NTEC has submitted an application for the โ€œNo Name Permit,โ€ after the No Name arroyo runs through the permit area. It would expand coal mining operations across about 11,526 acres. NTEC proposes to mine 9,042 acres of the area, with a maximum annual production rate of 5 million tons of coal per year, starting in 2031. The total mined coal would be approximately 503 million tons, extending the mineโ€™s life to 2136. In late January, the Office of Surface Mining held a scoping meeting at the Burnham Chapter House, where members of the community, environmental justice groups and employees voiced their concerns or support for the expansion. The office said during the meeting that it intends to prepare a draft environmental impact statement by August less than a year after NTEC submitted its permit application package application. Many critics of the expansion say that’s too quick of a turn around.

Mining Monitor: #Arizona projects advance — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org)

Viewing platform at the Ray Mine in central Arizona. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

March 13, 2026

โ›๏ธ Mining Monitor โ›๏ธ

While the Four Corners Country uranium mining โ€œrenaissanceโ€ advances in starts and fits and hyped up press releases, copper and critical mineral extraction in southern Arizona moves forward in more substantial ways.

Last week, the U.S. Forest Service published the final environmental impact statement for South32โ€™s proposal to re-open and expand the Hermosa Mine in southern Arizona to extract battery materials such as manganese and zinc, along with silver and lead. This opened the 45-day objection period.

The mine is on patented claims (private land), but would be expanded onto unpatented claims (public land) in the Coronado National Forest in southern Arizonaโ€™s Patagonia Mountains, an area long inhabited by the Sobaipuri Oโ€™odham and Hohokam people. The mountains occupy the nexus of several different biological provinces and are home to hundreds of species of birds, bees, bats, and butterflies, as well as the unique Madrean Pine-Oak Woodlands.

The proposed action, an underground mine, would play out on about 442 surface acres and would restrict access to about 578 acres of public lands. Mining would be done by the long-hole open stope method.

Area residents and advocates worry this sort of industrialization will harm the delicate and unique ecosystem and the diverse array of wildlife that depends on it. As is often the case with underground hardrock mining, a primary concern is for its effects on water quality and quantity.

Under South32โ€™s proposed action, it would pump about 2,790 acre-feet of groundwater per year to dewater the mine, which would draw down the aquifer and water levels of area wells. Some of this water would be used for other mining purposes, some would be discharged into area streams, and some would be discharged into rapid infill basins in order to slow the aquiferโ€™s drawdown.

Acid mine drainage is expected to occur in the sulfide ore body, which, if not treated properly, could contaminate groundwater or streams in the arid region.

For more info and to object, go here: https://www.fs.usda.gov/r03/coronado/projects/65668


Canada-based Faraday Copper has signed a letter of intent to acquire the shuttered San Manuel copper mine in southern Arizona from BHP Group Limited. The San Manuel mine, just outside Mammoth, Arizona, was once the nationโ€™s largest underground copper mine and a significant producer up to its closure in 1999.

Faraday hopes to reopen the mine and associated infrastructure and pair it up with its proposed Copper Creek venture nearby.

The proposed Copper Creek mine covers about 78 square kilometers in the Galiuro Mountains about 9 miles east of Mammoth. Last June, the Bureau of Land Management approved Faradayโ€™s plan to construct 67 drill pads, along with associated roads and infrastructure.

The development has sparked pushback from residents, advocates, and tribal nations, who worry about the drillingโ€™s potential impacts to water quantity and quality in the Lower San Pedro River, which flows nearby, not to mention the prospect of a giant open pit mine in the biodiverse mountain range. The proposed mine site is also near the Aravaipa Wilderness Area, a stunning canyon and desert riparian zone.

***

Mining company press releases tend to be vapid pronouncements about purportedly successful prospecting efforts. But every once in a while, they say something interesting. Such was the case with a bulletin sent out with this header:

American Atomics Bets $18 Million on Utah Uranium: Will It Break Free from Coloradoโ€™s Regulatory Grip and Capitalize on the Nuclear Surge?

What the heck is this about? American Atomics, nรฉe Great Northern Energy Metals, is looking to acquire an 80% interest in 217 mining claims in the Lisbon Valley in Utah. In the process, they are apparently abandoning a project near Slick Rock, in San Miguel County, Colorado, because the county recently implemented new mining regulations.

I knew that San Miguel County was working on mining regulations โ€” which were adopted this January โ€” but Iโ€™m honestly a bit surprised that they chased this company away from a viable project. Which could indicate that the project wasnโ€™t actually all that viable in the first place.

American Atomics would acquire the Lisbon Valley claims from Big Indian Prospecting LLC, which is run by none other than Mark Steen, the son of Moabโ€™s uranium king Charles Steen.


Lisbon Valley Blues Images from a sacrifice zone — Jonathan P. Thompson

My first impulse upon seeing the faded and tattered windsocks as I motored along a southeastern Utah backroad in early November was to look for the landing strip. There was none. Then I saw the distinctive infrastructure of an oil and gas well surrounded by WARNING POISON GAS KEEP OUT sโ€ฆ


๐ŸŸ Colorado River Chronicles ๐Ÿ’ง

The incredible shrinking Lake Powell is having a tough time of it lately. First, itโ€™s growing smaller and smaller, thanks to acidification and folks pulling more water out of the Colorado River than it carries, which is causing some boat launch ramps to be unusable. As the reservoir subsides, it leaves big sand and mudflats behind, which leads to nasty quicksand that can suck in unsuspecting beachgoers. The National Park Service is warning visitors about those two hazards, and now thereโ€™s a new one: harmful algal blooms containing cyanotoxins have been detected at dangerously high concentrations in parts of the reservoir. The NPS recommends avoiding water that has algal blooms.

โ˜˜๏ธ Annals of Alfalfa ๐Ÿ€

For those of you interested in the alfalfa, irrigation, and Colorado River issues, I recommend going back and checking out the comment thread on Tuesdayโ€™s โ€œAlfalfa Fallacyโ€ dispatch. At last count there were 26 comments, all of which add context and insight to this tangled issue.

Anyone can read the comments, but only paid subscribers can contribute to the comment section and become part of this smart community. So sign up now!

The Alfalfa Fallacy: There are no “obvious” solutions to the Colorado River crisis — Jonathan P. Thompson


๐ŸŒต Public Lands ๐ŸŒฒ

Thereโ€™s a lot of press on Sen. Mike Leeโ€™s and Rep. Celeste Maloyโ€™s attempts to use the Congressional Review Act to axe Grand Staircase Escalanteโ€™s management plan. Thereโ€™s a good reason for all of the attention: Itโ€™s another bid by the senator to diminish public lands protections, which seems to be his primary mission and the consequences could be far-reaching.

That said, it seems that a lot of the coverage is slightly overblown, and maybe gives the wrong idea of what, exactly, this might mean for the national monument if it is successful. So Iโ€™m going to try to offer some clarity here. Iโ€™m not doing this to criticize these media outlets โ€” which I do respect โ€” but hopefully to explain what a national monument designation does and the role its management plan plays.

Inside Climate News headlined their story on the move like this:

A Little-Used Maneuver Could Mean More Drilling and Mining in Southern Utahโ€™s Redrock Country

More Than Just Parks wrote this:

The monument would still exist on paper. But the framework governing what happens on 1.87 million acres of southern Utah canyon country would be gone. Camping, grazing, road access, mineral extraction, cultural site protections. All of it. And BLM would be legally prohibited from replacing it with anything substantially similar.

A monument without a management plan is a legal shell. A name on a map with no rules governing what happens on the ground.

Okay, this move could mean a lot of things somewhere down the road, including perhaps more mining and drilling somewhere, and it would set a scary precedent. But eliminating the management plan for the national monument will not by itself lead to more drilling and mining within the national monument. Thatโ€™s because even without a management plan, a national monument does have meaning and certain restrictions that are inherent in its national monument-ness. It is not, as MTJPs puts it, merely a โ€œlegal shell.โ€

When a president designates a national monument under the authority of the Antiquities Act, they typically withdraw all federal land within the boundaries from new mining claims and energy leases. When re-establishing GSENM after it had been shrunken by Trump, President Biden proclaimed that the land would be withdrawn โ€œfrom all forms of entry, location, selection, sale, or other disposition under the public land laws, from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws, and from disposition under all laws relating to mineral and geothermal leasing.โ€

Existing, valid leases and claims are grandfathered in, but in the case of GSENM, the feds bought out the only existing lease โ€” for a coal mine on the Kaiparowitz Plateau โ€” shortly after the original designation in 1996.The proclamation designating the national monument also contains other, overarching guidelines. For example, when Biden restored GSENM and Bears Ears in 2021, he added this to the proclamations:

โ€œThe Secretary shall โ€ฆ ensure the protection of sacred sites and cultural properties and sites in the monument and provide access to Tribal members for traditional cultural, spiritual, and customary uses โ€ฆ including collection of medicines, berries and other vegetation, forest products โ€ฆ .โ€

And he added this:

โ€œShould grazing permits or leases be voluntarily relinquished by existing holders, the Secretary shall retire from livestock grazing the lands covered by such permits or leases โ€ฆ Forage shall not be reallocated for livestock grazing purposes.โ€

These things are baked into the national monument from the beginning, and stand apart from any management plan. They canโ€™t be altered without revoking the proclamation or replacing it with another one.

The management plan then zooms in and develops a more detailed regulatory framework, such as which areas of the monument might be off limits to grazing, or if and where recreational target shooting is allowed, or which roads are designated for motorized use. While they are usually more restrictive than the pre-monument resource management plans, this isnโ€™t always the case. And they typically donโ€™t address oil and gas drilling or mining because those uses are prohibited by the national monumentโ€™s proclamation.

Lee and Maloy are looking to revoke the management plan, not the national monument itself (although Iโ€™m sure theyโ€™d like that, too). If they succeed, they will not clear the way for drilling or mining within the monumentโ€™s boundaries. Nor will it create some kind of anarchic free-for-all in the canyons of southern Utah.

Most likely the monument would revert back to the previous management plan, which was developed under Trump I for a significantly diminished national monument. This is problematic because that plan was more lax, sought to reinstate suspended grazing leases, and allowed extractive uses in the removed parts of the monument. If nothing else, it will cause confusion and leave some parts of the national monument in regulatory limbo.

However, all of the land will still be overseen by the BLM, and would still be subject to federal environmental and historic preservation laws. Camping, grazing, and road access rules and cultural site protections wouldnโ€™t just vanish. And, of course, new mining claims and energy leases would continue to be banned within the monument, because those withdrawals supersede the management plan.

That said, the prospect of eliminating this management plan is alarming. The agencies spent years developing it in consultation with tribal nations, they incorporated oodles of public comments and concerns, and ended up with a solid, compromise blueprint for overseeing a vast and varied and spectacular landscape. Lee would just be tossing all of that effort and all of the resources that went into making it into the trash, while sowing confusion for both the national monument managers and its many visitors. And all for what?

Iโ€™m guessing Leeโ€™s just trying to score points with his base. But also, it seems that his long-term agenda is to force public land management into a state of utter dysfunction in hopes of gaining support for his mission to turn over public lands to private hands.


The Meaning of Monuments: Pondering the on-the-ground effects of a national monument designation — Jonathan P. Thompson


***

On a related note, one reader asked how the Congressional Review Act could be applied to a management plan that was finalized over a year ago. After all, the CRA is intended to be used on new rules, and has a set time limit. Great question! For an answer, I consulted an explainer by Sarah Hart-Curran of the Harvard Law Schoolโ€™s Environmental & Energy Law Program.

Hart-Curran writes: โ€œFor 60 legislative days after Congress receives a rule, Congress can use โ€˜fast trackโ€™ procedures to issue a joint resolution of disapproval, meaning Congress needs only a simple majority in the Senate to veto the rule.โ€

Obviously, it has been more than 60 days since the plan was finalized. So what gives? Well, like all such plans, this one was not submitted to Congress, simply because these plans have not been considered โ€œrulesโ€ in the past. So really, they shouldnโ€™t be subject to the CRA at all, time limit or no. Hart-Curran explains:

โ€œIf an agency does not submit a rule that Congress thinks should be subject to CRA review, congressional practice is to request an opinion from the GAO. If the GAO finds the action is subject to the CRA, the GAO opinion serves as submission of a rule, beginning the 60-legislative-day clock.โ€

Yeah, so Lee and Maloy submitted this to the GAO, the GAO said it was a rule, and so the 60-day clock is now ticking.


๐Ÿ“ธย Parting Shotย ๐ŸŽž๏ธ

The now defunct Hatch Trading Post back when it was still running. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Why is it so warm so early in the season?

By Robert Marcos

A serene sunset over a river, with golden rays shining through the clouds and reflecting on the water, surrounded by lush greenery.
The Colorado River passing Grand Junction, Colorado. Photo by Robert Marcos.

The summer-like heat in the American West is being caused by a combination of persistent highโ€‘pressure systems, longโ€‘term warming from climate change, and an ever-worsening drought.1

The main condition behind the current weather is the development of strong, stagnant highโ€‘pressure ridges, often called โ€œheat domes,โ€ over the western United States. In these patterns, air sinks over the region, compresses, and warms (adiabatic warming), while clear skies allow intense solar heating of the surface. Because the high pressure suppresses cloud formation and storm systems, the hot air remains parked in place for days or weeks, letting temperatures climb far above normal.2

These weather patterns are occurring on top of a background of humanโ€‘driven climate warming, which raises the baseline temperature so that heat waves start from a hotter average and break records more easily. Studies of recent western and Pacific Northwest heat waves show that such extremes would have been virtually impossible, or far less intense, without anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions. Warmer air also increases โ€œevaporative demand,โ€ meaning the atmosphere pulls more moisture from soils, vegetation, and water bodies, further drying the landscape.3

At the same time, much of the West has been in a longโ€‘running drought or โ€œmegadrought,โ€ with declining rain and snowpack, especially in the Southwest and Colorado River basin. Low snowpack and early melt remove a natural cooling reservoir, so land surfaces heat up faster and earlier in the warm season. With drier soils and sparse vegetation, more of the sunโ€™s energy goes directly into raising air temperature rather than evaporating water, amplifying surface heat and extending fire season.4

Finally, oceanโ€“atmosphere patterns over the Pacific, such as persistent ridging and a positive phase of broader circulation patterns, help steer and reinforce these highโ€‘pressure systems over the West in summer. Together, these intertwined conditionsโ€”blocking high pressure, climateโ€‘driven warming, deepening drought, and altered atmospheric circulationโ€”have produced the unusually intense and frequent summertime heat now characterizing the American West.5

March 2026 Water Supply Briefing — Colorado Basin River Forecast Center #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification

Click the link to read the article on the NOAA website:

Happy Pi Day!

Mrs. Gulch’s cherry pie creation for Coyote Gulch’s birth anniversary March 2020. She also grew the cherries.

February 2026 was #Earthโ€™s fifth-warmest February on record — Jeff Masters (YaleClimateConnections.org)

Land and Ocean Temperature Percentiles for Januaryโ€“December 2025 (ยฐC). Red indicates warmer than average and blue indicates colder than average.

Click the link to read the article on the Yale Climate Connections website (Jeff Masters):

March 11, 2026

February 2026 was the worldโ€™s fifth-warmest February in analyses of global weather data going back to 1850, NOAAโ€™sย National Centers for Environmental Information, or NCEI, reported March 11. The Europeanย Copernicus Climate Change Serviceย also rated February 2026 as the fifth-warmest February on record, while NASAย had it tied for fourth-warmest. The global-average temperature for December 2025 to February 2026 was the fifth-highest on record.

Figure 1. Departure of temperature from average for February 2026, the worldโ€™s fifth-warmest February since record-keeping began in 1850. Record-high February temperatures covered 5.1% of the Earthโ€™s surface. No land or ocean areas observed record-cold February temperatures. (Image credit: NOAA/NCEI)

Global land areas had their sixth-warmest February on record in 2026, while global oceans had their second-warmest February, falling just 0.16 degrees Celsius (0.29ยฐF) shy of the record set in 2024, NOAA said. Africa had its second-warmest February, and South America and Asia experienced their seventh- and eighth-warmest February, respectively. While North America, Europe, Oceania, the Arctic, and the Antarctic all experienced above-average February temperatures, none ranked among the top 10.

Snow cover in February was well below average over the Western U.S. and much of Asia and Europe. Overall, Northern Hemisphere snow cover during February 2026 was the third-lowest since records began in 1967.

Remember all that snow that fell from the Carolinas to Boston? I bet you assume this has been quite a snow season overall. Well, for the Lower 48, this is the least snowy season (through February) for any year since at least 1940-41 when looking at all years through February. Thanks humans!

Climatologist49 (@climatologist49.bsky.social) 2026-03-09T01:19:05.902Z

Warm and dry in the U.S.

As detailed in our post from Tuesday, in the contiguous U.S., winter 2025-26 was the second-warmest and fifth-driest in records going back to 1895. February was the fourth-warmest and fifth-driest February on record. According to the March 5 U.S. Drought Monitor report, about 55% of the continental U.S. was in drought at the beginning of March, up from the 43% coverage at the beginning of the year. Snow-covered area across the Western United States was 38% of the average for February, ranking last in the 26-year satellite record. It was the second month in a row to reach a record low.

Folks still thawing out might be wondering: How bad a U.S. winter was it overall? Very bad โ€“ that is, if youโ€™re concerned about long-term warming and intensified drought impacts. (2nd warmest and 5th driest on record.) @climateconnections.bsky.socialyaleclimateconnections.org/2026/03/we-j…

Bob Henson (@bhensonweather.bsky.social) 2026-03-09T22:05:42.867Z

An El Niรฑo event looking more likely to develop this year

A weak La Niรฑa event continues in the Eastern Pacific, NOAA reported in its February monthly discussion of the state of the El Niรฑo/Southern Oscillation, or ENSO (the next discussion is scheduled for March 12). La Niรฑa conditions are expected to end in the February-April 2026 period (60% chance), with ENSO-neutral conditions then persisting through August (56% chance). An increasing chance of El Niรฑo conditions is predicted as 2026 progresses, according to the Columbia University International Research Institute for Climate and Society forecast issued February 19. Update: On March 12, in its monthly ENSO discussion, NOAA issued an El Niรฑo Watch; they noted that if El Niรฑo does materialize later this year, there is now a 1-in-3 chance that the event will be a strong one.

The forecast for the August-September-October peak of hurricane season called for a 61% chance of El Niรฑo, a 34% chance of ENSO-neutral, and a 5% chance of La Niรฑa. NOAA is giving a 35% chance of moderate or stronger El Niรฑo conditions if an El Niรฑo event develops. El Niรฑo conditions tend to suppress Atlantic hurricane activity through an increase in wind shear, but La Niรฑa conditions tend to have the opposite effect. The most recent ENSO forecast from the European model was very bullish on a significant El Niรฑo event developing by late spring or summer and continuing through at least fall 2026.

Seeing this ENSO forecast shared a bit. Let me put my ENSO hat on for a sec to say a couple things.1. This uses a 1981-2010 climo which will boost the anomaly numbers.2. This doesn't use the Relative Oceanic Nino index (RONI), which would slash these anomaly numbers by, my guess, 0.5C1/2

Tom Di Liberto (@tdiliberto.bsky.social) 2026-03-06T16:42:12.286Z

Last month, NOAA switched to using the Relative Oceanic Niรฑo Index, or RONI, as its standard ENSO monitoring tool. This tool uses sea surface temperatures across the tropics to adjust the Oceanic Niรฑo Index, making it a better gauge of how ENSO is expressed in a warming climate.


Read: A new and better way to keep tabs on El Niรฑo


Arctic sea ice: third-lowest February extent on record

Arctic sea ice extent during February 2026 was virtually tied with February 2017 as the third-lowest in the 48-year satellite record, behind only February 2025 and February 2018, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center. Overtopping this depleted ice was an atmosphere more frigid than the recent norm, as the Arctic had its 45th warmest February since 1850 โ€“ but the coldest since 2009.

 Antarctic sea ice extent in February 2026 was near the long-term average, ranking as the 21st-lowest in the 48-year record. The Antarctic had above-average temperatures in February, ranking as the 13th-warmest since 1850. Antarctic sea ice reached its minimum extent for the year, at 2.58 million square kilometers (996,000 square miles) on February 26, 2026, ranking 16th-lowest in the 48-year satellite record.

The latest El Miรฑo/Southern Oscillation (#ENSO) diagnostic discussion is hot off the presses from the Climate Prediction Center

Click the link to read the discussion on the Climate Prediction Center website:

March 12, 2026

ENSO Alert System Status:ย La Niรฑa Advisoryย /ย El Niรฑo Watch

Synopsis: A transition from La Niรฑa to ENSO-neutral is expected in the next month, with ENSO-neutral favored through May-July 2026 (55% chance). In June-August 2026, El Niรฑo is likely to emerge (62% chance) and persist through at least the end of 2026.

La Niรฑa continued in February 2026, with below-average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) persisting in the east-central equatorial Pacific Ocean. The latest weekly Niรฑo-3.4 index value was -0.5ยฐC, with the westernmost (Niรฑo-4) and easternmost (Niรฑo-1+2) indices at -0.2ยฐC and +0.6ยฐC, respectively. The equatorial subsurface temperature index (average from 180 -100ยฐW) continued to increase, reflecting the strengthening of above-average subsurface temperatures across the Pacific. Over the east-central equatorial Pacific, low-level wind anomalies were easterly, while upper-level wind anomalies were westerly. Convection was suppressed over the Date Line and convection was enhanced over Indonesia. The traditional and equatorial Southern Oscillation indices were positive. Collectively, the coupled ocean-atmosphere system remained consistent with La Niรฑa.

The North American Multi-Model Ensemble (NMME) average, including the NCEP CFSv2, points toward ENSO-neutral through the late Northern Hemisphere Spring 2026, with a transition to El Niรฑo thereafter. Even though model forecasts are relatively less accurate this time of year, the increasing odds of El Niรฑo are supported by the large amount of heat in the subsurface ocean and the expected weakening of the low-level trade winds. If El Niรฑo forms, the potential strength remains very uncertain,ย with a 1-in-3 chanceย that it would be โ€œstrongโ€ during October-December 2026 (Niรฑo-3.4 โ‰ฅย +1.5ยฐC). In summary, a transition from La Niรฑa to ENSO-neutral is expected in the next month, with ENSO-neutral favored through May-July 2026 (55% chance). In June-August 2026, El Niรฑo is likely to emerge (62% chance) and persist through at least the end of 2026.

#Colorado ski towns see โ€˜strongโ€™ decline in spring break bookings due to low-snowfall season, market study shows: Steamboat reservations for March down 10%; Western Slope towns promote off-mountain spring break activities — Steamboat Pilot & Today #snowpack

The Yampa River Core Trail runs right through downtown Steamboat. Photo credit City of Steamboat Springs.

Click the link to read the article on the Steamboat Pilot & Today website (Andrea Teres-Martinez). Here’s an excerpt:

March 12, 2026

Fewer families are booking spring break vacations to Colorado resort destinations, as weaker-than-normal ski conditionsย cause drops in reservationsย made later in the season. Amid the potential for a lower-revenue spring break tourism season, some Western Slope ski towns are focusing on promoting off-mountain activities for families. For most resort towns across Coloradoโ€™s western mountains, spring break is a strong period for tourism. Travelers from both in and out of state book trips to the mountains in hopes of hitting the slopes before the end of ski season, and businesses organize seasonal events to draw in visitors. This yearโ€™s near historically dry conditions, however, have meantย fewer winter bookings to Coloradoโ€™s resort destinationsย โ€” and spring break bookings are seeing the impacts…Coloradoโ€™s spring break season, though still bringing in bookings, will likely end with lower revenue for mountain destinations compared to previous years, Foley said. Soard added that the considerable decrease in bookings will likely also lead to impacts for the townโ€™s sales tax collections.

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map March 13, 2026.

Navajo Dam operations update March 13, 2026: Bumping down to 250 CFS Monday #SanJuanRiver #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification

Navajo Lake

From email from Reclamation (Conor Felletter):

Due to the increasing severity of the ongoing drought, and in an effort to conserve as much water as possible, the Bureau of Reclamation will decrease the release from Navajo Dam to 250 cubic feet per second (cfs) on Monday, March 16, at 8:00 AM.

West Drought Monitor map March 10, 2026.

This change provides an opportunity to conserve approximately 1,500 acre-feet of stored water during the remainder of March while downstream targets are being met by side inflows.

Releases from Navajo Dam are made for the authorized purposes of the Navajo Unit and to support base flows through the endangered fish critical habitat reach of the San Juan River (Farmington to Lake Powell). The San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program recommends a target base flow of between 500 cfs and 1,000 cfs through the critical habitat area. The target base flow is calculated as the weekly average of gaged flows throughout the critical habitat reach from Farmington to Lake Powell.

This scheduled release change is subject to adjustment based on river flows and weather conditions.

If you have any questions, please contact Conor Felletter (cfelletter@usbr.gov or 970-637-1985), or visit Reclamationโ€™s Navajo Dam website at https://www.usbr.gov/uc/water/crsp/cs/nvd.html

Map of the San Juan River, a tributary of the Colorado River, in Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah, USA. Made using USGS National Map data. By Shannon1 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=47456307

Snow #Drought Current Conditions and Impacts in the West — NIDIS

Click the link to read the update on the NIDIS website. Here’s an excerpt:

March 12, 2026

Record Snowpack Deficits Worsen in February; Conditions Expected to Deteriorate Further with Chances for Record Heat

Key Points

  • Snow drought worsened from February into early March due to record warmth, despite near-normal precipitation across much of the West. Some locations, such as the central and northern Cascades in Washington, were also drier than normal during this period. Every major river basin and state in the West is experiencing aย snow drought.
  • Record-breaking high temperatures are forecasted for large parts of the West. Further, theย 6-10ย andย 8-14 dayย outlooks from NOAAโ€™s Climate Prediction Center lean toward drier-than-normal conditions for almost all of the West along with a strong probability of warmer-than-normal temperatures through March. Record-breaking snow drought conditions are expected to further deteriorate as snow melt begins much earlier for some.ย 
  • Every major river basin in the West experienced its first or second warmest winter (December, January, and February) on record. The Great Basin, Rio Grande, Arkansas-White-Red, and Upper and Lower Colorado River Basins experienced their warmest winter on record, while the Missouri and Columbia River Basins recorded their second warmest.
  • As of March 8, Colorado reported record-low statewide snowpack. Stations in the Cascade Range in Oregon and Washington are reporting the greatest snowpack deficits in the West. Some states, such as California, are already experiencing an early melt out of snow.
    • The Colorado River Basin reports record-low snow water equivalent (SWE).ย 
    • Basins like the Deschutes, Humboldt, Yakima, and Rio Grande continue to see snow drought conditions deteriorate.ย 
  • Snow drought impacts are occurring and are expected to worsen. Municipal and agricultural water supply concerns and restrictions are increasing.
    • The Bureau of Reclamation’s most probableย forecastย for Lake Powell shows minimum power pool elevation being reached by December 2026. If the water drops below this point, the Glen Canyon Dam may no longer generate hydroelectricity.
    • The Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s initial Aprilโ€“September water supplyย forecastย for the Yakima Basin has those with pro-ratable water rights only receiving 44% of their full water allotments.ย 
    • The North Platte River Basin is underย priority administration issued by theย Wyoming State Engineerโ€™s Officeย based on the Modified North Platte Decree.

Snow Drought Conditions Summary

This update is based on data available as of Monday, March 9, 2026 at 12:00 a.m. PT. We acknowledge that conditions are evolving. 

Quantifying snow drought values is an ongoing research effort. Here, we define snow drought as snow water equivalent (SWE) at or below the 20th percentile, which is a baseline guided by partner expertise and research. Note that reporting of SWE by Snow Telemetry (SNOTEL) stations may be unavailable or delayed due to technical, weather or other issues, which may affect snow drought depiction in this update. 

Current Conditions

The last three months (December, January, and February) were the warmest or tied the warmest winter on record dating back to 1895 for Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. Arizona and New Mexico broke their previous records set in 2015 and 1907, respectively, by over 2ยฐF. California, Idaho, and Montana experienced their second warmest winter on record; Washington experienced its fourth warmest. 

Coming off of a record-dry January, near-normal precipitation fell over most, but not all, of the West in February and early March. Precipitation deficits are increasing in parts of Colorado, the Washington Cascades, New Mexico, Arizona, and the plains of Wyoming and Montana. 

This winter brought record flooding, rain-on-snow events, record-warm temperatures, and record dryness across the West. Because of these conditions, snow melted early in many places and failed to accumulate in middle and lower elevations. Snow fell and is currently present at higher elevations where temperatures were cold enough to produce snow, but high-elevation snow does not offset overall deficits from the absence of middle and low-elevation snowpack. As a result, snowpack remains extremely low across the West. Some minor improvements occurred in some basins over the last month, but there was not enough snow to offset the substantial deficits.

If Precipitation Fell, It Fell as Rain for Many

February 1โ€“March 9, 2026 precipitation for Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) 6 basins across the West, shown as a percentage of the 1991-2020 median. Red hues indicate basins that received less than 50% of normal precipitation for this period. Only stations with at least 20 years of data are included in the station percentiles. Values are averages of high-elevation precipitation at SNOTEL stations and are not representative of all portions of the HUC, which extend to lower-elevation valleys. For an interactive version of this map, please visit the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). Source: USDA NRCS.

Winter Concludes as the Record Warmest for Much of the West

December-February mean temperature percentiles based on an 1895-2026 period of record. Red hues indicate temperatures in the top third (warmest) of historical conditions, while blue hues indicate temperatures in the lowest third (coldest) of historical conditions. Graphic is from the Western Regional Climate Centerโ€™s Westwide Drought Tracker and the source data are from the PRISM Climate Group.

Winter Ends With More Record-Low Snow

SNOTEL and Cooperator Snow Sensor sites in the Western U.S. with snow water equivalent (SWE) values at or below the 30th percentile as of March 8, 2026. Stations above the 30th percentile are shown with a black โ€œx.โ€ We define snow drought as SWE below the 20th percentile (red, orange, and tan hues). This analysis only used stations with at least 20 years of data. This map does not show stations where the median SWE value for the date is zero. Data source: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service.

Rocky Mountain Snow Conditions (Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Utah, Wyoming)

Northern Rocky Mountains

  • 54% of stations in Montana are in snow drought
  • 59% of stations in Idaho are in snow drought
  • 42% of stations in Wyoming are in snow drought

Snow drought conditions continue to be widespread across the region. Lower to mid-elevation and plains snowpack is almost non-existent across Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. February precipitation was near-to-above normal, except over northern Montana, as well as central and eastern Wyoming, which saw substantial precipitation deficits. Record-breaking warm temperatures in February worsened snow drought as precipitation that fell did so as rain. Snow accumulated mostly at the highest elevations across the Northern Rocky Mountains.

Snow water equivalent (SWE) in Idaho is 58-87% of median, with many SNOTEL stations in southwestern Idaho reporting record-low values. Record-low SWE is occurring at many SNOTEL stations across Wyomingโ€™s Big Horn and Laramie Mountains. In western Montana, SWE is 78-95% of median, with several stations reporting record-low SWE values across the state.  

Central Rocky Mountains

  • 74% of stations in Utah are in snow drought
  • 97% of stations in Colorado are in snow drought

Despite snowfall in February, snow drought continued across the Central Rocky Mountains of Colorado and Utah. Colorado experienced its warmest February on record, and Utah its third warmest on record. Though snow water equivalent (SWE) as a percent of median improved over the last month, seasonal deficits are so great that snow drought and record-low SWE persists in much of the region. For example, from February 10-20 several snow storms brought substantial, needed snow across the state of Colorado. However, the snow was not enough to alleviate deficits, and statewide average SWE remained at a record low.

Both the Upper and Lower Colorado River Basin are reporting record-low SWE. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service’s SWE projections for the Upper Colorado River Basin indicate that the most likely scenario peak SWE is around 10-30% of normal. These values could change depending on how conditions evolve. In Colorado, SWE in 1977 and 1981 was lower than in 2026, according to long-term snow course records with at least 50 years of data. However, this was due to less precipitation. Winter 2026 was much warmer than the winters of 1977 and 1981, while those years were much drier than this year. 

Colorado statewide average SWE is at its record low, 63% of median. Utah statewide average SWE is the second lowest on record at 65% of median. All basins in the Central Rocky Mountains are below 70% of median SWE, except small portions of the Green River Basin in northeast Utah. 

Record-Low Snow Water Equivalent Since Mid-January in the Upper Colorado River Basin 

Water year observed (black line) and projected (dashed red line) accumulated snow water equivalent (SWE, in inches) in the Upper Colorado Region HUC 2 watershed. Water Year 2026 conditions are compared to the 1990-2020 median (gray line) and to the bottom 10th percentile of historical conditions (red), 10th-30th percentile (yellow), 30th-70th percentile (green), 70th-90th percentile (light blue), and 90th-100th percentile (dark blue). Valid March 9, 2026. SWE projections are based on historical observations and do not include future forecast data. The 50th percentile SWE projection is indicated by the dashed red line and the likely (30th-70th percentile) range by gray shading. Source: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS).

Looking Ahead

Temperature and Precipitation Outlooks

Record-breaking high temperatures are forecasted for large parts of the West next week. Further, theย 6-10ย andย 8-14 dayย outlooks from NOAAโ€™s Climate Prediction Center lean toward drier-than-normal conditions for almost all of the West along with a strong probability of warmer-than-normal temperatures through March. Record-breaking snow drought conditions are expected to further deteriorate as snowmelt begins much earlier for some. Additional, early snow loss at middle- and low-elevation stations is likely to occur over the next two weeks. Some basins may melt completely weeks earlier than normal. These forecasted conditions would increase already critical water supply concerns across the West…

Water Supply Forecasts

Many regions are likely to see earlier and lower than usual runoff. Water supply forecasts from the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center are well-below average, with most sites forecasted to see less than 70% of average season runoff. The forecasted unregulated inflow into Lake Powell is only 35% of average, which would be the fifth driest over the historical record. Seasonal water supply forecasted volumes from the California-Nevada River Forecast Center dropped significantly after the late February snowmelt event in the Sierra Nevada, and most locations are forecasted to receive less than 70% of median Aprilโ€“July runoff. In the Northwest, Aprilโ€“September runoff volume forecasts are mostly near to below normal, according to the Northwest River Forecast Center. Forecasts from the Missouri Basin River Forecast Center range around 78% of average for the Missouri Basin above Fort Peck, Montana. 

Wildfire

Without the presence of snow across the landscape, soils and plants may begin to dry out earlier than usual. Due to the record-breaking warmth this year, high temperatures can lead to increased and rapid dry down of the landscape, again leading to an early start to the fire season. An extended fire season is a critical concern but does not guarantee large fires, as ignitions would still be required to generate large wildfires. 


For More Information, Contact:

Dan McEvoy 
Desert Research Institute, Western Regional Climate Center
daniel.mcevoy@dri.edu

Jason Gerlich
University of Colorado Boulder Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences / NOAAโ€™s National Integrated Drought Information System 
jason.gerlich@noaa.gov

Amanda Sheffield 
University of Colorado Boulder Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences / NOAAโ€™s National Integrated Drought Information System 
amanda.sheffield@noaa.gov

One year after landmark $100M #PoudreRiver settlement, work faces delays — Jerd Smith (Fresh Water News) #NISP #SouthPlatteRiver

Fly fishing on the Poudre River west of Fort Collins. Photo credit: Colorado Water Trust

Click the link to read the article on the Water Education Colorado website (Jerd Smith):

March 12, 2026

More than a year after a landmark $100 million environmental settlement designed to improve the Poudre River was OKโ€™d, little progress has been made to put the agreement into action.

The settlement, signed last February, came after Save The Poudre sued to stop the $2.7 billion Northern Integrated Supply Project (NISP). The deal was crafted to allow NISP to move forward while paying to improve the Poudre and protect it from any harm the project could cause.

The Northern Integrated Supply Project, currently estimated at $2 billion, would create two new reservoirs and a system of pipelines to capture more drinking water for 15 community water suppliers. An environmental group is now suing the Army Corps of Engineers over a key permit for Northern Waterโ€™s proposal. (Save the Poudre lawsuit, from Northern Water project pages)

NISP is designed to serve roughly one dozen fast-growing cities along the Northern Front Range and will include two reservoirs and a pipeline.

The Community Foundation of Northern Colorado is leading the effort to implement the settlement, which includes projects that will make the river healthier for fish and aquatic habitat, improve water flows and water quality, and increase recreational opportunities.

The foundation is overseeing a six-member committee that began meeting last August. The committee will decide how to implement the ambitious environmental projects outlined in the settlement.

โ€œWe are taking time to be intentional,โ€ said Jodie Riesenberger, the foundationโ€™s vice president for community impact. 

But work has also been slow because key payments from NISP participants to the foundation are tied to benchmarks in building the massive reservoir and pipeline system. The committee received its first $5 million payment last year when the settlement was signed and is supposed to get its next $5 million payment when construction begins, something that could have happened later this year but has since been delayed. The full $100 million is to be paid out over a 20-year period, Riesenberger said.

Since the settlement was approved, though, the projectโ€™s largest customer, the Fort Collins-Loveland Water District, has dropped out of NISP. A handful of other cities, including Evans, have also dropped out, citing concerns about soaring design and construction costs, as well as the cost of the environmental settlement.

In response, Northern Water, which is overseeing project construction, temporarily halted design work as it re-examined NISPโ€™s size.

Now, construction isnโ€™t likely to begin until 2027 or later, according to Northern Water spokesman Jeff Stahla.

โ€œWe did slow things down,โ€ Stahla said, โ€œbut there is still a chance we can start in mid-2027.โ€

Save The Poudre River President Gary Wockner said the delays arenโ€™t surprising.

The committee has โ€œbeen moving slow because there is a lot to learn. If you want to fix problems on the river, you have to understand the river and know what the problems are,โ€ he said. 

Since the river committee began meeting in August, Riesenberger said work has focused on analyzing what the issues are and trying to figure out how and whether to spend the money they have on hand now.

The delays โ€œdonโ€™t impact what weโ€™re doing yet, but it could if it drags on longer. The dream is that these dollars could do transformational things for the river,โ€ Riesenberger said.

More by Jerd Smith

The South Platte River Basin is shaded in yellow. Source: Tom Cech, One World One Water Center, Metropolitan State University of Denver.

#Arizona tribal leaders testify in support of Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement — KJZZ #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification

The Colorado River flows beneath Navajo Bridge in Arizona on Dec. 27, 2019. Three tribes in Arizona are pushing for a settlement that would solidify their access to the River’s water and provide billions of dollars for water infrastructure. Photo credit: Mitch Tobin/The Water Desk

Click the link to read the article on the KJZZ website (Alex Hager). Here’s an excerpt:

March 11, 2026

Coverage of tribal natural resources is supported in part byย Catena Foundation

Tribal leaders and U.S. senators spoke out in support of a measure that would solidify access to water for three tribes with land in Arizona during a Wednesday [March 11, 2026] hearing at the Senate Indian Affairs Committee.ย  The Northeastern Arizona Indian Water Rights Settlement, or NAIWRSA, would settle claims to water by the Navajo, Hopi and San Juan Southern Paiute tribes, and provide $5 billion to build new water delivery systems and help the tribes access their water. The settlement would need to be authorized by congress to go into effect. At Wednesdayโ€™s Senate committee hearing, impassioned pleas to bring water to tribal communities ran up against federal concerns about the cost of a settlement, and talks of hesitation from some states that use the Colorado River.

โ€œThis settlement is more than a legal agreement,โ€ said Lamar Keevama, chairman of the Hopi Tribe. โ€œIt is a path forward. It allows the Hopi tribe to remain and protect our homeland, supports economic development and ensures that our communities have the basic resources necessary to thrive.โ€

An official with the Interior Department said he was supportive of the settlementโ€™s aims, but was concerned with the cost.

โ€œ$5 billion is a lot of money,โ€ said Scott Cameron, Interiorโ€™s principal deputy assistant secretary for water and science. โ€œWe look forward to working with the committee and with the three tribes and the other interested parties, of which there are quite a few, to see if we can’t creatively come up with some ideas to still satisfy the purposes of the bill at somewhat less cost.โ€

Lamar Keevama, chairman of the Hopi Tribe, testifies in front of a U.S. Senate Committee on March 11, 2026. โ€œThis settlement is more than a legal agreement,โ€ he said. โ€œIt is a path forward.” Photo credit: U.S. Senate Committee On Indian Affairs

NAIWRSA has partially been hung up by a unique geographical challenge and longstanding tensions between states that share the Colorado River. The river, which is at the heart of settlement talks, is divided into two regions โ€” the Upper Basin and the Lower Basin. Its water is managed by the seven states that use it, and they have been deeply split about new policies to share water. They generally fall into two camps โ€” the Upper Basin states of Colorado, Utah, Wyoming and New Mexico, and the Lower Basin states of Arizona, California and Nevada. The Navajo Nation straddles both basins, with land in Arizona, New Mexico and Utah. Some of its land falls within a portion of Arizona that is technically part of the Upper Basin. Some Upper Basin states worry that the settlement would allow the Navajo Nation to take water from the Upper Basin and lease it for use in the Lower Basin, creating a precedent that could open the door to more transfers out of the Upper Basin. Buu Nygren, president of the Navajo Nation, pushed back on that suggestion.

โ€œIt is hard to imagine that any Upper Basin state would object to my people being able to use water that they have used for decades simply because of the fear of a potential precedent,โ€ he said.

From the 2018 Tribal Water Study, this graphic shows the location of the 29 federally-recognized tribes in the Colorado River Basin. Map credit: USBR

Record-low #snowpack tests #Colorado’s recreation economy — Katy Marquardt Hill (CU Boulder Today)

Photo credit: University of Colorado at Boulder

Click the link to read the article on the University of Colorado website (Katy Marquardt Hill):

March 11, 2026

Coloradoโ€™s snowpack is at its lowest in over 40 years this winter, raising alarms not only for skiers but for the many communities whose economies depend on outdoor recreation. While the lack of snow is highly visible on ski slopes, its effects stretch far beyond lift lines and even beyond Coloradoโ€™s borders.

Natalie Ooi. Photo credit: University of Colorado at Boulder

Natalie Ooi, a teaching professor who is the director of the Masters of the Environment (MENV) program andย leads theย Sustainability in the Outdoor Industryย specialization, studies sustainable tourism and recreation economies.ย CU Boulder Today recently spoke with Ooi about why this season stands out, how towns built around outdoor recreation can adapt, and what longer-term conversations communities across the Mountain West and beyond should be having.

How unusual is this winterโ€™s snowpack, and what makes it significant?

Mountain and recreation-dependent communities are seasonal by nature, so they expect some year-to-year variation and understand that weather influences visitation. But as Russ Schumacher, the state climatologist at Colorado State University, has reported, this winterโ€™s lack of snow is the most severe since SNOTEL data began in the early-mid 1980s. (SNOTEL, which stands for snowpack telemetry, is a network of backcountry weather stations that gather and transmit snowfall data.)

One of the challenges in talking about the outdoor recreation economy is that while we often focus on mountain resort communities, there are recreation-dependent communities across the entire state. Whatโ€™s unique about this season is that all of Colorado is effectively experiencing drier than normal conditions. Typically, you might see some areas below average, others at or above average. This year, itโ€™s widespread. That scale is worth highlighting.

Itโ€™s easy to focus on mountain resorts because snowโ€”or the lack of itโ€”is so visible. But itโ€™s just as important to think about river-based and other recreation-dependent communities and what this will mean for them in the spring.

Beyond skiing, which activities feel the impact of a low-snow winter?

River-dependent activities like rafting, tubing and fly fishing are also affected. At these record low snowpack levels, some rivers may limit recreation from a conservation perspective to protect aquatic species and overall river health if water levels drop too low. That creates a difficult dynamic for communities whose economies depend heavily on outdoor recreation and visitation. This isnโ€™t just about ski townsโ€”businesses tied to camping, backpacking, guiding, gear rental, retail and campground operations also feel the effects when visitation patterns shift.

In mountain resort and ski communities, thereโ€™s always season-to-season variation. Many ski industry managers will tell you average snowfall years are actually the best for business. Too much snow can create operational challenges and even deter some visitors. But in an average year, thereโ€™s enough snow to keep serious skiers happy while still being manageable for beginners and intermediates.

Why is this season particularly hard for ski resorts?

I think this season is more challenging because you have that double whammy of not just a lack of snowfall, but high temperatures as well. If itโ€™s cold and thereโ€™s a lack of snowfall, most ski areas can make enough snow to build a solid base and open a good percentage of terrain that the majority of visitors and residents will use. They can still operate at a capacity where people continue to ski and arenโ€™t canceling vacations.

This year, though, the combination of low snow and high temperatures makes that much harder. Itโ€™s just not feasible to make enough snow when it wonโ€™t stick around. The energy and water demands required to make snow that quickly melts simply arenโ€™t a sound management decision.

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map March 11, 2026.

What does low snowpack mean for spring and summer river economies?

Low snowpack affects not just total water levels but also runoff timing. Shorter, earlier runoff windows can compress rafting and fishing seasons, making it harder for outfitters to plan staffing and reservations.

How does wildfire complicate the picture?

Wildfire is a real challenge for Colorado and the West. One of the biggest issues is how far-reaching the impacts are because of smoke. There are legitimate public health and safety concerns about being outside and inhaling that level of smoke.

Even if Colorado doesnโ€™t have a wildfire in a major tourism region, a fire in Wyoming, Utah or elsewhere can still affect the tourism season. As the climate warms and wildfire risk increases, that disruption could become more common across multiple states.

How do resorts try to adapt in the short and long term?

Itโ€™s hard to pivot in the short term. That kind of rapid adaptation is challenging. But over the years, many ski resorts have adopted diversification strategies to reduce their reliance on winter and ski tourism as their sole focus.

If you look at Alterra Mountain Company and Vail Resorts as examples, thereโ€™s a reason they own and/or manage resorts across the U.S. and internationally. This season, for instance, the East Coast is having a phenomenal year. That likely means above-average visitation and revenue there, which can help offset declines in places experiencing poor snow conditions. Geographic diversification is one key strategy.

What ripple effects are communities seeing beyond lift ticket sales?

Lift ticket revenue is obviously a key part of a ski resortโ€™s business, but itโ€™s not the only one. This season provides a clear illustration of that dynamic.

For example, Vail Resorts reported that season-to-date skier visits were down 20% compared to the prior year. But lift revenue was down just 1.8%. That gap is largely due to season pass sales, which provide more stable, upfront revenue.

At the same time, other categories saw much steeper declines: Ski school revenue was down nearly 15%, dining revenue down almost 16% and retail and rental revenue down about 6%.

So even when lift revenue appears relatively stable, the broader resort ecosystem is feeling much sharper impacts. 

Lower visitation can also affect seasonal employment, reducing hours or shortening contracts for workers who rely on winter tourism income. That hurts resort companies, but it also impacts the supporting businessesโ€”often mom-and-pop shops or other chainsโ€”that rely on visitation. When overall visitation drops, all of those businesses feel it. The ripple effect across the entire community is significant.

What conversations should communities be having right now?

Economic diversification is key. Outdoor recreation is a powerful way to bring in visitors and outside dollars, especially in rural places that canโ€™t attract manufacturing or may never become the next tech hub. But communities need to think strategically about broadening their economic base and leveraging their outdoor recreation infrastructure as a quality of life attractor for other industries.

Some places are already doing this. Steamboat Springs, for example, has built out an entrepreneurial ecosystem that is rooted in outdoor recreation and the mountain lifestyle but is separate to the tourism economy. Grand Junction has leaned into mountain biking and its access to public lands, while also seeking to attract outdoor recreation brands to diversify its economy beyond traditional extractive industries. These kinds of investments help communities spread risk across seasons and industries.

Itโ€™s also about managing the visitation they do have and maximizing visitor spending. How do you encourage people not just to camp on adjacent BLM (Bureau of Land Management) land and leave, but to come downtown? How do you design trail systems so they start or end downtown, prompting visitors to buy an ice cream, a coffee or a meal?

Ian Billick on the favored mode of transportation at Crested Butte.

#Drought news March 12, 2026: The low #snowpack throughout the Central Rockies, especially #Colorado, remains a major concern heading into the spring

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

Following a drier-than-normal winter, a pattern change at the beginning of March resulted in widespread heavy precipitation (1 to 3 inches, locally more) and a 1-category improvement to parts of the Ohio and Middle to Lower Mississippi Valley. This drought improvement extended east to the Central Appalachians and the Northeast. However, a long-term drought continues for much of the Northeast. Despite the much-needed rainfall for portions of the Southeast and Southern Great Plains, severe (D2) to extreme (D3) drought persists for many areas. A low snowpack and early onset of snowmelt are a major drought concern for the West. As of March 10, drought of varying intensity was designated for parts of Hawaii. Alaska and Puerto Rico remain drought-free…

High Plains

Widespread drought of varying intensity continues across much of the Central Great Plains and Central Rockies. Drought expanded this past week to include all of southwestern Colorado and intensified for northwestern parts of the state. The low snowpack throughout the Central Rockies, especially Colorado, remains a major concern heading into the spring. As of March 10, snow water equivalent for the river basins of Colorado is running below 70 percent of the 1991-2020 average. There were a couple exceptions to the worsening conditions. A wet snow (1โ€ or more, liquid equivalent) supported the removal of extreme (D3) drought across parts of the Denver metro area. Heavy rainfall (more than 1.5 inches) prompted small 1-category improvements to eastern Kansas and southeastern Nebraska…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending March 10, 2026.

West

The low snowpack throughout much of the West is a major concern heading into the spring. As of March 10, snow water equivalent (SWE) is less than 40 percent of normal from the Cascades of the Pacific Northwest southward through the Great Basin and Four Corners region. 14-day temperatures, valid from February 25 to March 10, have averaged 5 to degrees F above normal. This warmer-than-normal end to February and start to March has led to an early onset of snowmelt for parts of the West. Although California remains drought-free, SWE is 53 percent of normal statewide according to the California Department of Water Resources. Overall, only minor changes were made this past week to the West Region. Based on increasing 60-day precipitation deficits and to reflect the low snowpack, abnormal dryness (D0) was added to parts of northern California. Drought expanded into southeastern Utah while intensifying to severe (D2) and extreme (D3) drought across northeastern and western portions of the state. Moderate (D1) drought was expanded across north-central to northeastern Washington along with central Oregon due to 30 to 90-day precipitation deficits and low snowpack…

South

Despite the locally heavy rainfall across the Lower Mississippi Valley along with eastern Oklahoma and Texas, only modest improvements were warranted as a favorable response among the various indicators was not enough to justify more widespread 1-week changes. However, targeted 1-category improvements were made to parts of northwestern Arkansas, eastern Oklahoma, eastern Texas, and the Lower Mississippi Valley where weekly precipitation amounts exceeded 2 inches. In areas that missed out on the beneficial rainfall, drought intensified for parts of west-central Oklahoma and the Oklahoma Panhandle. A majority of the South Region has received less than half their normal precipitation with a temperature departure of more than 6 degrees F above normal during the past 90 days. These 3-month precipitation and temperature observations are consistent with a La Nina wintertime pattern…

Looking Ahead

In the wake of a cold front, sharply colder temperatures are forecast to overspread the eastern U.S. on March 12. A second and even stronger cold front is expected to progress east from the Great Plains to the East Coast by March 16. Following this strong March cold front, subfreezing temperatures are forecast to extend as far south as Oklahoma and the Texas Panhandle. According to the Weather Prediction Center, 5-day precipitation amounts from March 12-16 are forecast to exceed 1 inch, liquid equivalent, across the Great Lakes and New England. Much needed rainfall is also anticipated for drought-stricken Florida. Elsewhere, drier weather is forecast for the Ohio Valley, Middle to Lower Mississippi Valley, and Great Plains. During mid-March, dry weather will be accompanied by an increasing chance of record heat across California, the Great Basin, and Southwest. A powerful Kona low will bring heavy to excessive rainfall to Hawaii through at least March 14.โ€ฏ

The NWS 6-10 day outlook (valid March 17-21) leans toward below-normal temperatures for the East, while above-normal temperatures are likely from the West Coast to the Great Plains. Above-normal temperature probabilities exceed 90 percent across most of California, the Great Basin, and Southwest. In contrast to the warmerโ€“than-normal temperatures over the West, Alaska is likely to be colder-than-normal. A majority of the lower 48 states are favored to have below-normal precipitation from March 17-21 with the largest below-normal precipitation probabilities (greater than 50 percent) forecast across the Central to Southern Great Plains, Southwest, and much of California. The wet pattern is forecast to persist for Hawaii with enhanced above-normal precipitation probabilities.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending March 10, 2026.

#Utah Senator Mike Lee and Representative Celeste Maloy look to Congressional Review Act to crush Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument, plan: Plus: Another #ColoradoRiver wonkfest; more public lands and #aridification news — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org) #COriver

Glen Canyon Dam, January 2022. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on The Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

March 6, 2026

๐ŸŒต Public Lands ๐ŸŒฒ

Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. Celeste Maloy, both MAGA Republicans from Utah, have formally introduced legislation to use the Congressional Review Act to revoke the Biden-era management plan for Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. If successful, the move would also bar the feds from developing a new management plan that resembles the current one.

The current management plan is not draconian by any means. It was fashioned over years, with oodles of input and compromise, and is far less restrictive than the preservation-oriented alternatives It allowed for motorized vehicle use on designated routes and added almost no new restrictions for livestock grazing. Revoking it is not the same as rescinding the national monument or shrinking its boundaries, and will not open up any of the monument to new mining claims or oil and gas leases.

So itโ€™s not clear what Lee and Maloy hope to achieve, except to strike a blow to a national monument that they donโ€™t like and to throw oversight of 1.9 million acres of public land into disarray. Or maybe theyโ€™re just trying to build up their anti-public-land credentials to head off challenges from even more extreme candidates such as, say, Phil Lyman, who just challenged Maloy for her 3rd District congressional seat.

You still have time to let your representatives in Congress know how you feel.


Ugggg.

While well-intentioned greens are parsing BLM director nominee Steve Pearceโ€™s words for indications he might be inclined to sell off public land, the Trump administration is orchestrating a massive de facto transfer of public lands to oil and gas companies.

Iโ€™m talking about oil and gas leasing. And no, itโ€™s not an actual transfer of public land; the lessee does not take title to the land, nor can they block public access, but they do get the rights to drill that land and preclude other uses on it. And, once it is drilled, the land is scraped of all vegetation, covered with heavy equipment, poked with a massive drill, hydraulically fractured, and becomes an industrial-scale, methane-, hydrogen sulfide-, and VOC-oozing hydrocarbon factory for many decades to come.

On the auction block this June is a good chunk of slickrock-studded landscape northwest of Moab, between Hwy. 191 and the Green River, along with some parcels in the Lisbon Valley. All in all, the BLM proposes selling off 39 parcels covering some 71,600 acres. You have until March 30 to give your two cents. https://eplanning.blm.gov/Project-Home/?id=6fad61fa-a7f2-f011-8407-001dd80bcf93

***

Of course, sometimes the BLM holds an oil and gas auction and no one comes. That was the case with the Big Beautiful Cook Inlet Oil and Gas Lease Sale (yes, that is the official name) held March 4 in Alaska, in which more than 1 million acres of offshore leases were put on the block. There were zero bids. Zilch. Nada. Someday, maybe every oil and gas lease sale will be like that.

***

A federal judge has halted construction of the Northern Corridor Highway through the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area near St. George, Utah, while an advocatesโ€™ lawsuit proceeds.

The BLM approved the contested project earlier this year. The Utah Department of Transportation, apparently wanting to get started before a legal challenge could take hold, began erecting fencing along the project, even though their development plan hadnโ€™t been approved. This activity would have disturbed desert tortoise habitat.

The court did not approve, blocking further work until the lawsuit is resolved.

***

In other Utah road news, Garfield County began chip-sealing the first ten miles of the Hole-in-the-Rock Road in Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, drawing protest and a lawsuit from environmental groups.

The county has been aching to pave the gravel road, which often becomes riddled with potholes and washboards, for years, but failed to gain BLM approval. Environmental groups have resisted, saying that improving the road could lead to more paving or widening of primitive byways in the area, and would increase the number of people and their impacts on the fragile landscape.

The county has also wielded RS-2477 โ€” an 1866 statute โ€” in an attempt to wrest control over the byway, which leads to the famed Colorado River crossing of the 1879 Latter Day Saint expedition to Bluff. Last July, a federal court granted Garfield County quiet title to the section of the road within the county.

Garfield County interpreted that as a green light to chip seal the road.

That triggered a lawsuit from the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, pointing out that because the road crosses BLM land, the county must still get the agencyโ€™s go-ahead for major improvements. It didnโ€™t, but the BLM has done nothing to stop the action, which SUWA says violates federal environmental laws.


๐Ÿฅต Aridification Watch ๐Ÿซ

I was accused recently of being all โ€œdoom and gloomโ€ when it comes to this yearโ€™s snow levels, so I set out to find some good news to report. It didnโ€™t go so well, but I did uncover a few tiny nuggets, including:

  1. After the February storms, the Center for Snow and Avalanche Studies reported: โ€œThis is rare, but currently we do not have any dust on the snowpack.โ€ Thatโ€™s good news because dust on the snow decreases albedo (reflectivity), leading to faster snowmelt. We need what little we have to stick around as long as possible. Buzzkill: The really big dust events tend to come in the springtime.
  2. I tend to rely on a handful of high-elevation SNOTEL sites as indicators of how the mountain snowpack is doing. One of them is in Columbus Basin in the La Plata Mountains. Like everywhere else, the snow water equivalent there is way below normal. However, itโ€™s still above 2002 levels for early March, so thatโ€™s kind of heartening. I guess?
  3. Hope lies in 1990: That year, snowpack levels in the Animas River watershed were lower on March 6 than they are today. But beginning in mid-March, storms pummeled the region, resulting in a May 3, 1990, snowpack peak that was 94% of normal and bringing runoff up to decent levels. We could see a repeat of that March-April-May miracle!
  4. And โ€ฆ oh. Iโ€™ve just been informed that there is no more good news.
As grim as this may be, it also offers a glimmer of hope: The snowpack could still recover like it did in 1990. Source: NRCS.

Now back to our regularly scheduled doom and gloom, bullet style.

  • The late February-early March heat wave across most of the West shattered thousands of daily high temperature records and dozens of monthly ones, topping off the Westโ€™s warmest winter on record. Monthly records (121 tied or broken nationwide during the last week of Feb.) include:
    • Dinosaur National Monument in Utah hit 68ยฐ F on 2/26;
    • Imperial County, Californiaโ€™s airport reached 97ยฐ on 2/28;
    • Albuquerque airport, 77ยฐ on 2/25;
    • Hovenweep National Monument in Utah, 70ยฐ on 2/28;
    • Havasu, Arizona, and Malibu Hills, California, were both 93ยฐ on 2/27;
  • Sampling of daily records (845 broken or tied during the last week of Feb) include:
    • Mancos, Colorado, hit 50ยฐ F on 2/28; the aforementioned Columbus Basin (elev. 10,784 feet) reached 48ยฐ and Mineral Creek, Colorado, hit 51ยฐ that same day;
    • McClure Pass, Colorado, reached 49ยฐ on 2/28;
    • Needles, California, and Phoenix both hit 92ยฐ on 2/28;
    • South Lake Tahoe airport, 60ยฐ on 2/28.

Those kinds of temperatures melt the snow, even on north faces, causing this yearโ€™s snow water equivalent graph lines to uncharacteristically dip during a time of year when they normally would be shooting upward. They also heighten risk of wildfires in the low country. On the last day of February,ย a blaze broke outย in Chautauqua Park in Boulder, forcing some evacuations before it was contained. Another one was sparked west of Boulder on March 4.

The North Fork of the Gunnison, which feeds the ditches in and around Paonia and Hotchkiss and the orchards, vineyards, and farms there, is in trouble. This yearโ€™s snowpack so far is in the same boat as it was on this date in 2002 and 2018, two very dry years when irrigation ditches were shut off early in the growing season.

Aside from the entire Upper Colorado River watershed, Iโ€™m also especially concerned about the North Fork of the Gunnison. Snowpack levels are at a record low for this date, or about the same as they were in 2018, and Paonia Reservoir is currently utilizing just 22% of its storage capacity (note the record high temp on McClure Pass above, at the headwaters of Muddy Creek, which feeds the reservoir). This does not bode well for the many small farmers who rely on the river for irrigation. In 2018, downstream senior rights holders made a call on the river in June, forcing junior irrigators in the North Fork to lose water perilously early in the season.

This bad situation could be exacerbated if the feds were to decide to release water from Paonia Reservoir in an attempt to buoy Lake Powell water levels. While this is hypothetical, it is not beyond the realm of possibility by any means.

And, saving for some sort of April-May miracle, the Colorado River runoff will be extraordinarily scant this spring and summer, almost certainly pushing Lake Powell to critically low levels.

***

That demands a plan, and the Bureau of Reclamation came up with several alternatives last month. Most of the major players have commented on the alternatives, and itโ€™s safe to say that almost no one is satisfied with any of them โ€” albeit for different reasons.

One of the more universal critiques is that none of the alternatives adequately address dry and critically dry scenarios on the river, like the one that is likely to occur this summer. The draft environmental impact statement itself states, โ€œIn critically dry periods, all alternatives have unacceptable performance.โ€ That leaves many wondering what, exactly, the Bureau of Reclamation plans to do to keep the system from collapsing over the next nine months.

There is a lot here, and it gets pretty darned deep in the wonk weeds. Still, what Iโ€™ve included is a mere sampling of some of the comments from just a few of the commenters in the hope that it will give readers a better idea of where different stakeholders stand, and how complicated and difficult this situation really is.

For those who donโ€™t like weeds, hereโ€™s the short version: Itโ€™s a tangled mess with a bunch of moving pieces and stakeholders who are digging in their heels to ensure that their constituents get the water they need to drink, irrigate crops, run industries, or whatever. And theyโ€™re all butting up against the reality that there simply isnโ€™t enough water in the river to go around.

Ian James has a slightly less crunchy version for the Los Angeles Times.

Here are the comments and commenters:

Fourย Democratic members ofย Arizonaโ€™s congressional delegationย feel that the Lower Basin is getting the dry end of the stick (their comments are similar to those of theย Arizona Department of Water Resources):

  • Arizona is understandably displeased because they would take the greatest hit under any alternative. This is not because they are somehow inferior, but because the water rights to the Central Arizona Project, which delivers Colorado River water to Phoenix and Tucson, are junior to most other big users in the Lower Basin.ย โ€œโ€ฆ each alternative, though broad in scope, will translate in practice specifically as drastic reductions to Arizonaโ€™s water supply.โ€
  • โ€œWe are deeply troubled that Reclamation all but abandons its increasingly critical role in ensuring the Upper Basin States fulfill their delivery obligations under the Colorado River Compact of 1922 (Compact).โ€ย This refers to the non-depletion or minimum-delivery obligation that Iโ€™ve written about before.
  • โ€œThe DEIS itself acknowledges that โ€˜widespread impacts on social and economic conditions may also be possible,โ€™ including circumstances in which municipalities may need to pursue alternative or even hauled water sources to maintain basic services. Drastic cuts could have cascading consequences for human health and safety and destabilize the lives and livelihoods of Arizonans, tribal communities, and critical industries that rely on Colorado River supplies.โ€
  • They say the cuts will damage the stateโ€™s agriculture, manufacturing, and aerospace industries and that it will put at risk: โ€œโ€ฆ the largest concentration of advanced semiconductor manufacturing investment in the country, representing roughly $200 billion in announced projects since 2020.โ€ Semiconductor production is extremely water-intensive, with the average factory consuming up to 10 million gallons of ultra-pure water daily.
  • They call on any plans toย โ€œinclude verifiable Upper Basin conservation measures commensurate with Lower Basin conservation measures, including identifying tangible metrics that demonstrate Upper Basin water conservation.โ€

The Colorado River District, which represents water users on Coloradoโ€™s Western Slope, wasnโ€™t so psyched about the alternatives, either:

  • โ€œWe believe that Reclamation must institute bold and meaningful changes but that those changes must be implemented in a manner that is consistent with the 1922 Colorado River Compact, the 1944 binational treaty with Mexico, the 1948 Upper Basin Compact, and the other foundational elements of the Law of the River.โ€
  • โ€œReclamation must prioritize hydrologic reality over predictability for Lower Basin users. The Draft EIS places undue emphasis on predictability1 for water users, a goal that is unattainable under future climate conditions unless system storage is replenished and overall demands are permanently reduced to match the supply.โ€
  • โ€œโ€ฆ several alternatives include Upper Basin water conservation ranging from zero to 500,000 acre-feet annually โ€ฆ <but> โ€ฆ fails to analyze the environmental or socioeconomic impacts associated with these conservation volumes.โ€ย It adds that a 200,000 acre-feet reduction in the Upper Basin would require fallowing 52,000 acres on the Western Slope.
  • โ€œLower Basin water use must be reduced by 1.5 million acre-feet at all times, regardless of the alternative. This amount represents system losses (i.e., transit losses and reservoir evaporation) and should not be classified as shortage.โ€ย This is a longstanding issue. Reservoir evaporation and other such losses are counted against the Upper Basinโ€™s consumptive use, in part because of the non-depletion obligation. The same is not true for the Lower Basin; when they say they use 7.5 million acre-feet, that does not include evaporation or seepage or other system losses, only what they pull out of the river.
  • โ€œThe range of alternatives must include option(s) that perform under critically dry hydrology. Currently, none of the alternatives in the Draft EIS perform under critically dry hydrology. At least one alternative must protect critical infrastructure and respond effectively to significantly lower river flows than historically observed.โ€ย We are approaching a critically dry situation this summer, when the feds will have to decide whether and how to keep Lake Powell from dropping below minimum power pool. So far there is no plan for this.
  • โ€œHydrology must drive Post-2026 operations. Operating guidelines based upon comparative reservoir elevations which do not factor in real time hydrology have been disastrous for protecting storage in Lake Powell and thus, have failed to provide the water supply certainty for the Upper Basin intended by the Law of the River โ€ฆโ€
  • โ€œInterbasin transactions must not be allowed in the proposed action.โ€ย That is, Upper Basin users with senior rights should not be able to sell their water to Lower Basin users.

Theย team of Anne Castle, John Fleck, Eric Kuhn, Jack Schmidt, Katherine Tara, and Kathryn Soren,ย river experts and academics who arenโ€™t representing any specific water user, state, or basin, alsoย weighed in. Their comments, as Fleck put it in hisย Inkstain blog, could be summed up as: โ€œTell us what youโ€™re going to do.โ€ย And, also:

  • The group calls on Interior toย โ€œprimarily focus on the Dry and Critically Dry scenarios. โ€ฆ We think it important to be mindful of the underlying year-to-year hydrology of the 21st century as we look to the future. โ€ฆ we are struck by the fact that 50% of the individual years of the 21st century have been Dry or Critically Dry, and only 27% of the years (including 2017, 2019, 2023) have been Moderately Wet or Wet.โ€
  • โ€œWe suggest that the DEIS include a description of an alternative that performs sufficiently well during Dry scenarios and an alternative that performs sufficiently well during Critically Dry scenarios.โ€
  • โ€œ โ€ฆ it is imperative that Reclamation provide a clear picture of what actions will be implemented in the near term (i.e., next year, next 3 years, next 5 years) to protect critical infrastructure, and to protect public health and safety.โ€
  • Noting that lawsuits are inevitable regardless of which alternative the feds choose, they urge them to avoid โ€œsafeโ€ options and go with a plan with โ€œโ€ฆ the broadest possible interpretation of Reclamationโ€™s and Interiorโ€™s authority to provide a predictable and resilient Colorado River so that the system can continue to operate in a reasonable manner while the lawsuits proceed.โ€
  • Call on the feds to โ€œโ€ฆ explore these areas for possible inclusion in the preferred alternative:
    • Reduction of deliveries in the Lower Basin in excess of 1.48 MAF when insufficient water is available for release.
    • Provision for releases of water from the Colorado River Storage Project initial units as necessary to protect critical elevations in Lake Powell and ensure continued Upper Basin Compact compliance.
    • Operation of federal projects in the Upper Basin to store or use less water during critical periods.
    • Continuation, expansion, and modification of Assigned Water programs (such as Intentionally Created Surplus and Mexican Water Reserve) with improvements to ensure operational neutrality and minimize adverse impact to priority water.
    • Establishing a conservation pool in Lake Powell for storing Upper Basin conserved water to be utilized for Compact compliance purposes. For more on conservation pools, check out the Shannon Mulaneโ€™sย explainerย in theย Colorado Sun.
  • The group finds fault with the plan for not addressingย โ€œthe need for enforceable reductions in the Upper Basin.โ€ย They go with the Lower Basinโ€™s interpretation of theย non-depletion/minimum-deliveryย obligation, saying that the Colorado River Compact does not guarantee that the Upper Basin gets half of the water in the river. Plus, they point out that the planโ€™s demand forecasts for the Upper Basin are unrealistically high, putting more of the burden for cuts on the Lower Basin.

Theย Southern Nevada Water Authorityย andย Colorado River Commission of Nevadaare especially critical, writing:

  • โ€œSince the onset of drought in 2002, <Nevada water users> have reduced their overall Colorado River water consumption by more than 40 percent even as our population grew by more than 875,000 people. And they, unlike so many others, have not ignored the reality facing the basin by making the flimsy argument that our economy cannot prosper while water consumption decreases.โ€
  • Like Arizona, they bring up the minimum-delivery/non-depletion clause of the Colorado River Compact and call on the Upper Basin to comply with it.
  • Interiorโ€™s โ€œโ€ฆ approach to protecting the Glen Canyon Dam river outlet works by reducing releases from Lake Powellโ€”rather than making infrastructure repairs and improvementsโ€”is shortsighted and harms Nevada and the Lower Basin States.โ€

Theย Upper Colorado River Commissionย emphasizesย the Lower Basinโ€™s history of exceeding its Colorado River Compact allocation and failing to account for evaporation and other system losses. Coloradoโ€™sย Upper Colorado River CommissionerBecky Mitchell submitted similar, very detailedย commentsย that emphasized the Colorado River Compactโ€™s equitable division of the river between the Upper Basin and Lower Basin. She points out that the Lower Basinโ€™s interpretation of the minimum-delivery/non-depletion clause contradicts and even negates that division.

๐Ÿ“– Reading (and watching) Room ๐Ÿง

Must read: Teal Lehtoโ€™s and Len Neceferโ€™s speculative fiction take on what might happen on the Colorado River, and to the people who rely on it, in 2030 if current climatic trends continue. Itโ€™s dramatic and sensational and catastrophic, but itโ€™s also very well informed, smart, and not at all far-fetched, in my humble opinion.

In a tiny #Colorado town, infighting dissolved the government. Now the waterโ€™s running out: State officials are scrambling to help #Hartman, a town of 30 near the #Kansas border — The #Denver Post

Welcome sign and water tower (2013) in Hartman. By Jeffrey Beall – Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=28063112

Click the link to read the article on The Denver Post website (Seth Klamann and Sam Tabachinik). Here’s an excerpt:

March 8, 2026

The mayor had quit and three active trustees resigned, too. They locked up the townโ€™s sole public building and dropped boxes of records off with the county. The town government had ceased to exist. There was no clerk to hold an election to replace the trustees, and there were no trustees to hire a clerk…More than a century after its founding, division among Hartmanโ€™s few dozen residents has led to the dissolution of their government, dropping the town into a bitter legal limbo with few analogs in Coloradoโ€™s recent history, all while its water supply stands on the brink of collapse. A tangled web of interpersonal feuds, played out in letters to the local newspaper, in social media posts and via legal filings in county court, has left the town with no clear path out of a situation thatโ€™s not covered by state law. The imbroglio has even reached the state Capitol, where Gov. Jared Polis directed state officials to visit the area and lawmakers are scrambling to devise possible solutions…

…unlike many other small towns, Hartman has its own water supply, and one of the trusteesโ€™ responsibilities was paying for and overseeing it.

After years of limping along, Hartmanโ€™s troubled water system is on the brink of failure. The money to keep its pump running โ€” paid in advance before the trustees quit โ€” will lapse in the coming months. The water will be unusable before it runs dry: The chlorine that cleans it will be exhausted as soon as next month. Without elected representatives, no one can hire a new operator to test the water, nor is there anyone to pay the local power company to keep the pump running. The town has been on a boil order since September. Whatโ€™s more, the townโ€™s combative reputation has made nearby authorities wary of stepping in to help.

โ€œItโ€™s a bad situation,โ€ said Ty Harmon, a Prowers County commissioner whose district includes Hartman. โ€œItโ€™s a very bad situation.โ€

[…]

State officials and lawmakers are now scrabbling to find a way to help a town with no money, no government, a dwindling water supply and a wariness of outsiders. That effort may ultimately include rewriting state law, redirecting grant money to a water authority willing to help, and charting a future for a town whose democracy has collapsed under the weight of its residentsโ€™ mutual distrust. Some have argued that Hartman has already tried to work together, without success.

โ€œWe shouldnโ€™t be a sovereign town,โ€ said Glenn Packer, a town resident whoโ€™s married to one of the recently resigned trustees. โ€œItโ€™s obvious it doesnโ€™t work here.โ€

Arkansas River Basin — Graphic via the Colorado Geological Survey

Report: Big Central #Arizona Project supply cuts would trigger huge economic hits, major job losses in Arizona — Tucson.com #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification

A screenshot from a new Central Arizona Project video, which says if water deliveries to the canal system are cut too much it will “cripple our state, flatten our economy and weaken our national defense.” Provided by Central Arizona Project

Click the link to read the article the Tucson.com website (Tony Davis). Here’s an excerpt:

March 9, 2026

Arizona will take nearly a $3 trillion total economic hit and lose millions of jobs that would have come to the state by 2060 if Central Arizona Project deliveries are halted by the federal government,ย a new report from the project’s governing agency says. A CAP consultant’s report said the state’s total economic output would by 2060 be 11% to 14% lower than it otherwise would have been, under two proposed federal alternatives for managing the Colorado River. At worst, the state’s total jobs would shrink by 7.9% if the project’s supplies were eliminated, the report said.ย  In addition, the state would see substantial declines in population and housing growth by then with massive CAP cuts, compared to what would have happened without them, said the report.

The three-county agency that runs the CAP’s canal system, stretching from Lake Havasu on the Colorado River to just south of Tucson, commissioned this report from the consulting firm WestWater Research, based in Boise, Idaho. The agency, known as the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, has managed daily operations for CAP since it was under construction in the 1970s. CAP submitted this report as part of its comments sharply criticizing the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s draft environmental impact statement onย proposed alternatives aimed at curbing excessive water useย by cities and farms in the seven-state Colorado River Basin. It comes out shortly after project officials releasedย a video warning that such cuts would “flatten” Arizona’s economy. At the time the video came out, some outside water experts said it oversimplified and overestimated the impacts of CAP cuts, in part because the state and local governments have already stored huge amounts of CAP water underground to prepare for such emergencies. But the new report says those supplies will eventually be exhausted, forcing many cities to return to groundwater pumping, and that some shortages of groundwater supplies themselves also could begin in some regions as soon as the early 2030s.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

Why wind & solar power won’t easily replace the energy being produced by the Glen Canyon Powerplant

Aerial view of a large concrete dam with water flowing below, surrounded by red rock formations.
Photo of South Lake Powell and Glen Canyon Dam provided by The Water Desk. Photo by Alexander Heilner. Aerial support from LightHawk

by Robert Marcos

The electrical power that’s being produced by new wind and solar farms cannot fully replace the power being lost as the output of the Glen Canyon Powerplant continues to fall.

As of March 11, 2026, the Powerplant is producing only 60% to 65% of its maximum output. At full capacity the plant can produce 1,320 megawatts. But because of Lake Powell’s low water level it’s currently producing between 800 and 870 megawatts. While new wind and solar power will cushion the impact of Glen Canyon’s decline, the hydroelectric power is a critical component of the regional power grid. Electricity from the Glen Canyon Powerplant is operationally superior to wind and solar mainly because it is dispatchable, highly flexible, and provides critical gridโ€‘stability services that variable renewables cannot provide on their own.

Dispatchability and reliability

Glen Canyon can generate on demand, ramping output up or down quickly to follow load; flows and generation are deliberately increased during weekday business hours to match demand.

Hydropower at Glen Canyon is not dependent on realโ€‘time sun or wind conditions, so it can produce power at night, during calm periods, and in cloudy weather, as long as water is available in Lake Powell.

The plant provides both energy and dependable capacity for resource adequacy, which is essential during extreme heat waves and other systemโ€‘stress events when solar and wind output may not align with peak demand.
โ€‹
Flexibility and ramping

Glen Canyon is explicitly operated for load following: its turbines adjust automatic generation control signals to continuously balance supply and demand, so actual output can be above or below the hourly schedule at any moment.
โ€‹
The dam is allowed to fluctuate releases to provide about 40 MW of regulation capacity, with shortโ€‘lived flow changes of roughly 1,200 cfs up or down that help stabilize the grid against secondโ€‘toโ€‘second and minuteโ€‘toโ€‘minute imbalances.

Turbines can ramp thousands of cubic feet per second within an hour (subject to environmental constraints), providing fast ramping that complements slower, weatherโ€‘dependent changes in wind and solar output.
โ€‹
Gridโ€‘stability and system services

Conventional hydropower units like those at Glen Canyon provide inertia, frequency regulation, spinning reserve, voltage support, and blackโ€‘start capability, all of which are necessary to keep the system stable as variable renewables grow.

These services are inherently available from large synchronous hydro generators without needing extensive additional powerโ€‘electronicsโ€‘based equipment that wind and solar typically require for similar functions.
โ€‹
Glen Canyonโ€™s participation in automatic generation control helps maintain area control error near zero, directly supporting system frequency and reliability.
โ€‹
Scale, efficiency, and cost characteristics

Glen Canyon has a total capacity on the order of 1,300 MW and produces roughly 4โ€“5 billion kWh per year, enough for hundreds of thousands of households across seven Western states.

Modern hydro units have high conversion efficiency and very long lifetimes (often 50โ€“100 years), which spreads capital costs over decades and yields low longโ€‘run levelized cost of electricity compared with many newer wind and solar plus storage builds.

Revenues from Glen Canyon hydropower also fund environmental and riverโ€‘management programs in Glen and Grand Canyons, a coโ€‘benefit not typically associated with individual wind or solar plants.

As Coloradoโ€™s winter dries up, so do revenues for weather dependent businesses — #Colorado Public Radio

Clear Creek rafting via MyColoradoLife.com

Click the link to read the article on the Colorado Public Radio website (Haylee May). Here’s an excerpt:

February 16, 2026

The only thing snow shovels have been gathering recently is dust as Metro-Denver finds itself more than a foot behind its normal snowfall total this winter. Boulder National Weather Service Meteorologist, Russell Danielson, said the normal snow total through the end of January for metro-Denver is 27 inches. This year, just 13.4 inches fell. Thatโ€™s a sharp drop from 2025, when the region saw 38 inches of snow over the same time frame. In the mountains, itโ€™s even starker. Breckenridge typically sees 101.7 inches by the end of January. This year? Just 34 inches. The lack of snow has largely been framed as a ski industry problem. But across the Front Range and into Coloradoโ€™s river corridors, itโ€™s become something broader โ€” and more immediate. From car washes in southwest Denver to rafting guides scanning snowpack data in the high country, the dry winter is rewriting balance sheets in real time…For other weather-dependent businesses, the impact is far more dramatic.

โ€œWe calculated that we’re about 70% down,โ€ said Amy Campbell, office manager for Bear Creek Tree Service in Englewood. In a typical winter, her crews plow at least every other week โ€” sometimes multiple times depending on the storm…

West Drought Monitor map March 3, 2026.

The economic ripple from a dry winter wonโ€™t stop when the season changes. And that has small business owners who rely onย summerย tourism also worried. In Kremmling, co-owner of Downstream Adventures, Jonathan Snodgrass, is already watching the snowpack charts โ€” not for ski conditions, but for river levels.

โ€œI’m feeling a little worried,โ€ he said. โ€œIf it stays on this track, we’re looking at not a lot of water to work with for rafting. That could have some big impacts on the duration of our season and the quality of our product.โ€

Rafting on Clear Creek and the upper Colorado River depends heavily on snowmelt. In low years like 2018, Clear Creek trips ended around the third weekend of July. In stronger years, they run into late August โ€” sometimes up to Labor Day. Those final weeks are critical.

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map March 8, 2026.

A record warm winter could send #LakePowell to a historic low. Flaming Gorge may be its lifeline — The Salt Lake Tribune #GreenRiver #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification

A chart from the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center shows projected water supplies for the Colorado River basin compared to normal in 2026. (Provided by Colorado Basin River Forecast Center)

Click the link to read the article on The Salt Lake Tribune website (Brooke Larsen). Here’s an excerpt:

March 7, 2026

โ€œRight now the hydrology that we have in front of us puts us in a very, very precarious situation,โ€ said Gene Shawcroft, Utahโ€™s Colorado River negotiator. Utah just wrapped up its warmest winter on record. Salt Lake City broke its previous maximum average winter temperature by 2 degrees Fahrenheit โ€” a significant increase, according to the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. While the state received similar precipitation compared to last year, much of that fell as rain, leading to the worst snowpack since 1981 in parts of the state. Now, the water supply outlook is โ€œwell below normal,โ€ according to the center.  The Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s latest most probable forecast for Lake Powell shows it sinking below โ€œpower poolโ€ โ€” 3,490 feet โ€” by December. At that level, water canโ€™t make it through the turbines at Glen Canyon Dam that generate hydropower and keep the lights on across Utah and six other states. Powell could hit that dangerous low even sooner, though. The bureauโ€™s most recent forecast was based on the Colorado Basin River Forecast Centerโ€™s February report. Since then, the centerโ€™s projection for water flows into Powell has dropped by 100,000 acre-feet. The bureauโ€™s most probable forecast can also be optimistic. The agencyโ€™s minimum probable forecast, which shows a dry scenario that would statistically happen only 10% of the time, sometimes aligns more with reality. Last year, the April 2025 minimum probable study forecasted Lake Powell to hit 3,535 feet in elevation by the end of February 2026. The lake currently sits at 3,530 feet. The bureauโ€™s latest minimum probable forecast shows the lake dropping below 3,490 by the end of August. 

โ€œItโ€™s safe for us to assume that, unless Mother Nature is uncharacteristically generous, that Lake Powell elevations are going to fluctuate at elevations that weโ€™re not comfortable with,โ€ Wayne Pullan, Upper Colorado regional director for the bureau, said at a Glen Canyon Dam meeting last week…

To prop up Powell, the bureau will likely rely on another popular Utah reservoir: Flaming Gorge. The reservoir that straddles the border of Utah and Wyoming has the best water outlook in the basin, at 64% of normal, according to the forecast center. The Upper Green River, which flows into Flaming Gorge, is the โ€œlone bright spotโ€ for snow water equivalent โ€” the amount of water snow holds…Under a 2019 plan, the bureau may form an agreement with Utah and the other states in the Upper Colorado River Basin โ€” Colorado, New Mexico and Wyoming โ€” to release water from Flaming Gorge and a few other reservoirs, such as Blue Mesa in Colorado, to maintain hydropower at Glen Canyon Dam.  Thatโ€™s what happened the last time forecasts showed Powell dropping to a dangerous low level in 2022. A record wet winter followed that dry year, though, boosting the reservoirs.

States blast USBR draft EIS of potential #ColoradoRiver options — Scott Franz (KUNC.org) #COriver #aridification

Lake Mead and the big โ€œbathtub ringโ€ as seen from next to Hoover Dam. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on the KUNC website (Scott Franz):

March 6, 2026

The sluggish Colorado River negotiations have entered a new phase: Long and fiery letter writing.

Politicians, water negotiators and environmental groups recently submitted hundreds of pages of comments on the Interior Departmentโ€™s playbook for how to manage the waterway. There are currently five possible options to deal with the river in the absence of a deal between the seven states in the basin.

The alternatives were published in January and could result in a variety of scenarios, ranging from significant water reductions in lower basin states to creating new incentives for states to conserve water. 

And after the states missed two deadlines for reaching an agreement themselves on how to share and conserve the water, itโ€™s becoming increasingly likely the federal government will piece together its own plan before the current guidelines expire in August. 

Public comment on the Interior Departmentโ€™s menu of alternatives ended Monday. And leaders from both the upper and lower basins are blasting them.

In a 45-page letter, Coloradoโ€™s water negotiator said the federal government lacks the legal standing to enact the alternatives itโ€™s put on the table. 

The state is generally calling for a plan that forces states in the lower basin to cut back more of their water use in the face of drought.

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2025. Note the tiny points on the annual data so that you can flyspeck the individual years. Credit: Brad Udall

โ€œThe Colorado River has changed dramatically over the last two decades, and our operating rules need to change with it,โ€ Colorado River Commissioner Becky Mitchell said in a statement. โ€œThe current rules have not done enough to protect Lake Powell and Lake Mead, and itโ€™s clear that a future management framework must better respond to todayโ€™s reality.โ€ 

Mitchell said the river is nearing a crisis point. She wrote that under current operating guidelines for the two reservoirs, which have been in place since 2007, Interior has been releasing water to the lower basin โ€œbased on demand, largely ignoring worsening hydrology and dropping reservoir levels.โ€

Downriver in Arizona, leaders are also blasting the Interiorโ€™s list of proposals, saying they would result in disproportional and severe water cuts to the lower basin states. 

The stateโ€™s Democratic congressional delegationย said the cuts could hurt national security.

โ€œArizonaโ€™s agriculture, semiconductor and advanced manufacturing, aerospace and defense industries rely on the Colorado River,โ€ the delegation wrote. โ€œReductions of the magnitude contemplated in the (feds playbook) would reverberate across rural communities and throughout the domestic food supply chain.โ€

The lower basin states of California, Arizona and Nevada are calling for mandatory water cuts in the upper basin states of Colorado, New Mexico, Wyoming and Utah. 

Leaders in those states have countered that they already enact water conservation measures during times of drought. 

A coalition of conservation groups, including The Nature Conservancy and Trout Unlimited, also weighed in on Interiorโ€™s draft proposals. They wrote that stabilizing the Colorado River in the face of drought โ€œdepends on early, proactive management; flexible and coordinated use of storage; meaningful Tribal participation; and integration of ecological integrity and mitigation into operational considerations.โ€

โ€œFrameworks that delay action, rely on rigid rules, or institutionalize emergency operations consistently perform worse under the hydrologic conditions the Basin is most likely to face.

The Interior Department plans to review the public comments and identify which option it prefers to manage the reservoirs sometime this spring. 

Environmental groups have warned negotiators in the seven states against taking their fight to court, saying that path could hold up conservation plans that are needed to protect places like the ecosystem of the Grand Canyon.

#ColoradoRiver district head: Deal between states still possible, necessary — The #GrandJunction Daily Sentinel #COriver #aridification

General Manager of the Colorado River Water Conservation District Andy Mueller speaks at the districtโ€™s annual seminar in 2018. Photo credit: Brent Gardner-Smith/Aspen Journalism

Click the link to read the article on the Grand Junction Daily Sentinel website (Dennis Webb). Here’s an excerpt:

The general manager of the Colorado River District says that despite blown deadlines, a deal between states is still possible and needed to deal with the crisis regarding the riverโ€™s management. But Andy Mueller says time is running short to do so with an existing agreement due to expire later this year and drought and Lower Basin overuse of the river putting water levels in Lake Powell at perilously low levels.

โ€œThe best alternative from our perspective is still to have the seven states find an agreement that provides certainty. Itโ€™s really hard to do that in the middle of a really terrible drought. Itโ€™s a multi-decadal drought,โ€ Mueller said…

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2025. Note the tiny points on the annual data so that you can flyspeck the individual years. Credit: Brad Udall

Mueller said everyone has been good at pushing off the crises in the Colorado River. But the buffer at Powell and Mead in terms of stored water has disappeared due to the Lower Basinโ€™s overuse and failure to account for system loss, and a changing river hydrology coming amidst warming temperatures, and as a result โ€œwe donโ€™t have that buffer anymore, so it truly is hitting a crisis,โ€ he said. The river has been beset by long-term drought for much of this century, reflecting what some refer to as aridification resulting from a warming climate…While Mueller remains hopeful that the states will continue to talk and keep the federal government from having to act on its own, the government needs to be prepared to move forward, he said. He said the next-worst alternative it is analyzing, which is called the basic coordination alternative but he considers to be the federal authoritiesโ€™ alternative, imposes cuts first on Arizona, and specifically its Central Arizona Project as a junior water right in the Lower Basin. Mueller said that alternative also says the goal will be to deliver at least 7.5 million acre feet a year from Powell. He said that under most reasonably foreseeable hydrologies, that will put Powellโ€™s infrastructure at risk. The water level would be in danger of falling below the intake tubes used to make power, which would leave the damโ€™s bypass tubes as the only way of getting water out of Powell and down into Grand Canyon. Those tubes have proven structurally problematic, subject to what is known as cavitation when a lot of water is moving through them, which has resulted in damage to them. Mueller said Reclamation has done a lot of work to try to repair them but no one he has talked to wants to rely on those tubes to get water below the dam..,Mueller said the federal alternative says that, to keep levels in Powell high enough to keep producing power and delivering water to the Lower Basin, it might have to take unspecified actions in the Upper Basin.

โ€œEverybody in the Upper Basin, everybody in western Colorado should be very concerned about that statement because the question is, what do they mean by that?โ€ he said.

He said that if the environmental impact statement is going to refer to contemplated actions, by law it needs to identify them and analyze their environmental and socioeconomic impacts. Because it doesnโ€™t, the entire EIS process is legally flawed when it comes to the alternative most likely to be adopted by the federal government, and if it goes that route it could get sued not just by Arizona, which is facing the biggest cuts, but by the Upper Basin, Mueller said. He said the unspecified actions probably would start with massive releases of water from primarily Flaming Gorge Reservoir but also Blue Mesa and Navajo reservoirs.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

#ColoradoRiver may deliver just a third of normal water supplies this spring, projections show: Record winter heat across basin has sapped water supplies, forecasters say — The #Denver Post #COriver #aridification

Click the link to read the article on The Denver Post website (Elise Schmelzer). Here’s an excerpt:

March 9, 2026

Extended warm weather across the Colorado River basin may reduce the amount of water delivered during the spring runoff to just a third of normal, according to federal forecasters. Modeling released late last week showed the river system on track to deliver a scant 2.3 million acre-feet to Lake Powell, one of the river systemโ€™s largest reservoirs. Thatโ€™s 36% of the median of 6.4 million acre-feet recorded between 1991 and 2020. If the forecast comes true, it would be the fifth-lowest inflow to Lake Powell since the reservoirโ€™s establishment in 1963, according to the National Weather Serviceโ€™sย Colorado Basin River Forecast Center.

โ€œItโ€™s not a pretty picture here,โ€ Cody Moser, a hydrologist with the center, said of the basinโ€™s snowpack during a briefing on the forecast Friday.

A chart from the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center shows projected water supplies for the Colorado River basin compared to normal in 2026. (Provided by Colorado Basin River Forecast Center)

Already,ย federal officials predictย water levels could fall so low at Lake Powell by August that water will no longer flow through the intake tubes for Glen Canyon Damโ€™s hydroelectric turbines. Lake Powell at the beginning of March was 24% full, while Mead โ€” which is in Nevada and Arizona โ€” was 34% full. Much of the Colorado Riverโ€™s water begins as snow in Coloradoโ€™s mountains, which have been plagued by record-low snowfall this winter. The Colorado River headwatersโ€™ snowpackย sat at 66% of the median for this time of year on Mondayย โ€” the lowest recorded level since measurements began in 1986.

โ€œThe Colorado headwaters are the worst this water year; theyโ€™re well below normal,โ€ Moser said, noting that many winter storms missed the area.

Assessing the U.S. Temperature and Precipitation Analysis in February 2026 — NOAA

Courtesy of a NOAA employee

Click the link to read the analysis on the NOAA website:

March 9, 2026

Key Points:

  • February was the fourth warmest and fifth driest on record for the contiguous U.S. (CONUS) in the 132-year record.
  • Winter (December 2024โ€“February 2025) ranked as the second warmest for the CONUS and was the driest in 45 years.
  • Arizona, New Mexico and Utah each broke their previous warmest-winter record by more than 2ยฐF.
  • A historic โ€œbomb cycloneโ€ during Feb 22โ€“24 brought blizzard conditions, hurricane-force wind gusts and heavy snowfall from the Mid-Atlantic to New England.
  • Alaska saw a particularly cold winter, recording much-below-average temperatures across parts of the central Interior.
  • Drought conditions expanded by more than 10% in February to cover more than half of the CONUS.
Map of the U.S. notable weather and climate events in February 2026.

Other Highlights:

Temperature

The CONUS average temperature during February was 40.4ยฐF, 6.6ยฐF above the 20th-century average. Extensive portions of the country west of the Mississippi River experienced much-above-average temperatures, while portions of the eastern seaboard observed below-average temperatures that ranked in the lowest third of their historical records. Seven states experienced one of their two warmest Februaries on record, including Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado and Oklahoma, which each set new statewide records.

February 2026 U.S. Mean Temperature Percentiles Map.

The CONUS average temperature for meteorological winter (Decemberโ€“February) was 37.1ยฐF, 4.9ยฐF above the 20th-century average, ranking as the second-warmest winter in the 131-year record. Based on average temperatures across NOAA climate regions, the West and Southwest each experienced their warmest winter on record, while the Northwest, Northern Rockies and Plains as well as the South each ranked second warmest. In contrast, the Northeast climate region was cooler than average, ranking in the lowest third of its historical record.

Nine states recorded their warmest winter on record, with an additional five experiencing their second warmest. Daytime high temperatures were particularly notable, with the CONUS averaging 48.3ยฐFโ€”5.6ยฐF above averageโ€”marking the warmest winter for daytime highs in the 131-year record and the first time the seasonal average exceeded 48ยฐF. Eleven states also recorded their warmest winter for average maximum temperatures. At the county level, 585 countiesโ€”home to more than 116 million people, or roughly one-third of the U.S. populationโ€”experienced their warmest winter on record for daytime highs. Illustrating this exceptional warmth, Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport recorded 16 days with maximum temperatures of at least 80ยฐF, the highest seasonal total on record (since 1898) and about 60% above the previous record set in 2016โ€“17.

Despite the widespread warmth, eight states stretching from Ohio to Massachusetts experienced below-average winter temperatures that ranked in the lowest third of their records.

The Alaska statewide temperature in February was 4.0ยฐF, 0.8ยฐF below the 1925โ€“2000 average and ranked in the middle third of the 102-year period of record for the state. Much of mainland Alaska had below-average temperatures, contrasting with above-average conditions in southeast Alaska, the Aleutians and the lower Alaska Peninsula. Alaskaโ€™s average temperature for winter was 0.8ยฐF, 2.8ยฐF below the 1925โ€“2000 average, ranking in the coolest third of the record. Much of the Alaska Interior recorded below- to much-below-average temperatures for the season, with Fairbanks Airport recording its coldest winter since 1970โ€“71.

The Hawaiสปi statewide average temperature during February was 63.2ยฐF, 0.2ยฐF above the 1991โ€“2020 average, ranking in the middle third of the 36-year record. For winter as a whole, the statewide average temperature was 64.4ยฐF, 0.7ยฐF above average, placing it in the warmest third of the record.

Precipitation

February precipitation for the CONUS was 1.37 inches, 0.76 inch below the 20th-century average and the driest since 2002. Significant precipitation deficits stretched from the northern Rockies and central Plains through the Midwest, Ohio Valley and Northeast, and from parts of the Southwest and southern Plains across much of the Deep South and Southeast. In total, 11 states recorded one of their 10 lowest February precipitation totals, including Mississippi, which broke its 1947 record receiving less than 30 percent of its average February precipitation. In contrast, above-average precipitation was largely confined to a narrow corridor from the northern Plains into the Upper Great Lakes, with isolated areas across parts of the West and Northwest.

February 2026 U.S. Total Precipitation Percentiles.

A historic blizzard on February 22โ€“24 brought heavy snowfall and hurricane-force winds to portions of the Northeast. Providence, RI, reported its largest snowstorm on record, while several other cities recorded February totals not seen in more than a decade. The storm was classified as a major snowstorm based on NOAAโ€™s Regional Snowfall Index (RSI), which estimates that snowfall affected more than 115 million peopleโ€”about one-third of the U.S. populationโ€”including about 28 million people who received over a foot.

The CONUS received an average of 4.95 inches of precipitation during winter, 1.84 inches below the 20th-century average, ranking as the fifth-driest winter in the 131-year record. Large portions of the central and eastern U.S. experienced much-below-average precipitationโ€”18 states recorded one of their 10 driest winters on recordโ€”while much of the western U.S. had near-average totals. A notable exception was Michiganโ€™s Upper Peninsula, which received much-above-average to record winter precipitation.

Alaskaโ€™s average monthly precipitation in February ranked in the middle third of the 102-year period of record. For winter as a whole, precipitation across Alaska was also near average.

The Hawaiสปi statewide precipitation total during February was 8.11 inches, 3.01 inches above the 1991โ€“2020 average, ranking in the wettest third of the 36-year record. Several records were set during the month as powerful Kona Lows delivered extreme rainfall, including over 25 inches in a single day on Oahu and a 72-hour total surpassing 30 inches on the Big Island. For winter as a whole, the statewide precipitation total was 16.22 inches, 0.33 inch below the 1991โ€“2020 average, placing it in the middle third of the record.

Drought

According to the March 3 U.S. Drought Monitor report, about 54.9% of the CONUS was in drought, an increase of about 10.4% from the beginning of February. Drought persisted across much of the Rockies and the eastern seaboard and expanded or intensified across portions of the northern Rockies, Plains, Mississippi Valley, South and Southeast.

Monthly Report

Most of the CONUS is favored to see above-average temperatures in March, with the highest probabilities (exceeding 60โ€“70%) centered over the South and Southeast, while Alaska is forecast to experience below-average temperatures, particularly in the Alaska Interior. Above-average precipitation is likely for a broad swath extending from the southern Plains through the Mississippi Valley and into the Great Lakes. Drier-than-average conditions are favored for much of California and Florida. Visit the Climate Prediction Centerโ€™s Official 30-Day Forecasts for more details.

Drought is expected to persist across much of the interior West, Southwest and High Plains, along with the eastern seaboard. However, significant improvement or drought removal is forecast for parts of the Southern Plains, across much of the Mississippi Valley and Hawaiสปi. Visit the U.S. Monthly Drought Outlook website for more details.

Significant wildland fire potential is above average across a wide region including the southern Plains, the Gulf Coast and the Southeast, extending northward into Virginia. For additional information on wildland fire potential, visit the National Interagency Fire Centerโ€™s One-Month Wildland Fire Outlook.


For more detailed climate information, check out our comprehensive February 2026 U.S. Climate Report scheduled for release on March 12, 2026. For additional information on the statistics provided here, visit the Climate at a Glance and National Maps webpages.

#ColoradoRiver outlook ‘not a pretty picture’ after warm, dry winter — AZCentral.com

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map March 8, 2026.

Click the link to read the article on the AZCentral website (Brandon Loomis). Here’s an excerpt:

March 7, 2026

Key Points

  • A warm, dry winter has resulted in a disappointing snowpack across the intermountain West, affecting the Colorado River’s water supply.
  • Projected inflow to Lake Powell is at a near-historic low, complicating efforts to manage water shortages among states.
  • Arizona’s local water supplies, on the Salt and Verde rivers, are in better condition than last year, though still below average.

The federal governmentโ€™sย Colorado Basin River Forecast Centerโ€™s March reportย noted much of the drainage, especially in the mountains of Colorado and Utah, had experienced their worst snowpack since at least 1981.ย When meteorological winter endedย on March 1, both Phoenix and Salt Lake City had broken records for maximum mean winter temperatures by 2 degrees Fahrenheit. The warmth that pervaded the West had melted much of the existing snowpack or caused it to fall as rain instead, encouraging evaporation and plant uptake and reducing the amount that will reach reservoirs this spring and summer.

โ€œItโ€™s not a pretty picture here,โ€ forecast center hydrologist Cody Moser said while reviewing a color-coded watershed map emblazoned with red to indicate vast areas projected to deliver relatively little runoff.

The result, as of early March, was a projected Colorado River inflow to the critical storage pool in Lake Powell of just 2.3 million acre-feet, or 36% of the 1991-2020 average. If that projection holds up, it would be the lowest April-July boost for Lake Powell since the disastrous year of 2002 firmly entrenchedย this age of megadrought...This profound snow drought comes at an especially awkward time, compounding a quarter-century of regional aridification that has drained the nationโ€™s two largest reservoirs to precarious depths.ย Lake Powell started March at just 24% of capacity,ย with much of that water functionally unavailable to flow downstream to Lake Mead and the Southwest because itโ€™s below Glen Canyon Damโ€™s hydropower and bypass intakes. Lake Mead began the month at 34% of capacity. Both began this century essentially full. The lack of storage complicates the U.S. Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s efforts to adoptย new dam-operating and shortage-sharing guidelinesย without triggering a lawsuit from states and water users. Unless they do that by October, the current rules imposing cutbacks on Arizona and others will lapse, potentially worsening the shortage. Yet Arizona has panned the options that the agency initially studied because, officials say, theyย unfairly target the state for bigger lossesย while not enforcing the Colorado River Compactโ€™s call for upstream states to let a minimum amount of water pass through.

#Snowpack news March 9, 2026

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map March 8, 2026.
Colorado snowpack basin-filled map March 8, 2026.

#Colorado, upper basin entities call for โ€˜durable,โ€™ supply-driven management of #ColoradoRiver in federal comment period — Sky-Hi News #COriver #aridification

Coyote Gulch’s Leaf in Byers Canyon, cut by the Colorado River, on the way to Steamboat Springs August 21, 2017.

Click the link to read the article on the Sky-Hi News website (Ali Longwell). Here’s an excerpt:

March 8, 2026

The state of Colorado, Upper Colorado River Commission, the Colorado River Water Conservation District, the Southwestern Water Conservation District and several Front Range water providers were among those that submitted comments, asking for the Bureau to finalize an agreement that legally fulfills all water rights while making bold and sustainable changes that align with the hydrologic reality of the river.ย 

โ€œThe Colorado River has changed dramatically over the last two decades, and our operating rules need to change with it,โ€ said Becky Mitchell, Coloradoโ€™s water commissioner and lead negotiator in the post-2026 operations, in a statement. โ€œThe current rules have not done enough to protect Lake Powell and Lake Mead, and itโ€™s clear that a future management framework must better respond to todayโ€™s reality. Coloradoโ€™s comments provide constructive, legally grounded recommendations to bring the system into balance.โ€ย 

[…]

Since the reservoirsโ€™ current operational guidelines were set in 2007, the Colorado River Basin has experienced deepening drought conditions, declining inflows to the reservoirs and shrinking storage in Powell and Mead. As ofย March 1, Lake Powell and Lake Mead were 25% and 34% full, respectively.ย  As the upper and lower basin states sought to reach a consensus on the post-2026 guidelines for the reservoirs, disagreements were rooted in where cuts needed to be made to deal with these worsening conditions. Through the deadline for consensus, the Lower Basin states offered up some cuts and pushed for basin-wide water use reductions. The Upper Basin states, however, have pushed back, claiming they already face natural water shortages driven primarily by the ups and downs of snowpack. In February, the upper division said thisย winterโ€™s critically low snowpackย will result in natural reductions โ€œgreater than 40% of the proven water rightsโ€ across the four states.ย  In the draft, the Bureau recognizes that with โ€œcritically low storage in Lake Powell and Lake Mead, significant hydrologic variability and the anticipation of drier future conditions,โ€ an agreement must strike a balance between โ€œpotentially profound impacts of water-delivery reductionsโ€ and โ€œthe need to maintain reservoir storage.โ€

The latest Upper Colorado River Commission and Colorado comments to the Bureau of Reclamation called on the federal agency to root the post-2026 guidelines on what the river actually supplies.ย  In itsย comment, the state of Colorado said that the โ€œfailures of the current set of guidelines developed in 2007 have driven the current crisis on the Colorado River.โ€

โ€œWe can no longer rely on the management strategies of the past to solve the challenges of the present and future,โ€ said Lauren Ris, director of Coloradoโ€™s Water Conservation Board. 

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2025. Note the tiny points on the annual data so that you can flyspeck the individual years. Credit: Brad Udall

Coyote Gulch’s excellent EV adventure: 2026 #MonteVista Crane Festival

Sandhill Cranes just before sunrise March 8, 2026, Sange de Cristo Mountains in the distance.

We woke up to clear skies and very cold temperatures (6ยฐF) for Sandhill crane viewing on March 8, 2026. The Sandhills spend the night on the ground, usually in shallow water as they do not perch, and then start stirring and looking for a good breakfast spot like the field in the foreground in the photo above.

Video of Sandhill cranes in the early morning on March 8, 2026, San Juan mountains in the background. Sound up!

Charging during the festival was easy as pie at the Colorado Welcome Center in Alamosa. For the trip home I charged in Salida (excellent food at Mojo’s Eatery) and Bailey. Charging to and from the San Luis Valley from Denver is convenient and reliable. There is no reason any longer in Colorado to drive a vehicle with a tailpipe and pollute the atmosphere.

Here’s a writeup from The Alamosa Citizen:

Monte Vista saw big crowds for the 43rd annual Crane Festival. The Outcalt Event and Conference at Ski Hi Complex was teeming with people participating in the crane tours and nature work sessions. The retail vendors reported healthy sales. The sandhill cranes themselves didnโ€™t disappoint. The majestic long-legged creatures were in the tens of thousands in the fields around the Monte Vista Wildlife Refuge. The cranes will stick around a bit longer.

Video of Sandhill cranes at breakfast. After flying around looking for breakfast great numbers of Sandhills settle down for breakfast March 8, 2026. Sound up!

“A different way of managing water in the west”

by Robert Marcos

Even though the San Diego County Water Authority’s MOU has proposed an initial water transfer of only 10,000 acre feet annually, General Manager Dan Denham said the agreement, (if approved by other agencies), could clear the way for the first-ever interstate transfers of Colorado River water starting next year. He said, โ€œIt’s just a different way of managing water in the Westโ€.1

Claude "Bud" Lewis Carlsbad Desalination Plant
The Claude “Bud” Lewis Desalination Plant in Carlsbad, California. Photo by Robert Marcos

California Govenor Gavin Newsom has supported the idea, telling governors of the other six states in a recent letter that California would welcome joint investments in water recycling and desalination. Denham said Scott Cameron – the Trump administrationโ€™s acting head of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, also supports the idea.2

The laws which forbid or limit the transfer of water across state or county lines originated in the early 20th century as states sought to protect their local resources from being diverted to rapidly growing urban centers. The Colorado River Compact of 1922 was a landmark agreement that effectively “locked” water within specific basins to prevent faster-growing states like California from claiming the entire river under the “prior appropriation” (first-come, first-served) doctrine.

But the San Diego County Water Authority, Arizona Department of Water Resources, the Central Arizona Water Conservation District, and the Southern Nevada Water Authority, are exploring a strategy that could bypass these legal barriers to interstate water transfers by using “paper water” transfers rather than physically moving desalinated water across state lines.3

While this method avoids the physical impossibility of moving ocean water to the desert, it still requires federal approval from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and from existing rights holders like the Imperial Irrigation District and the Metropolitan Water District which will have to ensure that these transfers do not negatively impact their own legal entitlements.

The March 1, 2026 #Colorado Water Supply Outlook Report is hot off the presses from the NRCS

Click the link to read the report on the NRCS website (and to visit the data for the individual basins). Here’s an excerpt: