HB 10-1188: Rafting bill faces uncertain outcome in State Senate

A picture named raftingarkriver.jpg

From The Denver Post (Jessica Fender):

Opponents of the bill have upped their lobbying firepower, started a full-court press on committee members scheduled to hear the legislation later this month and made the vote much tougher for some lawmakers who once favored the legislation. The turning tide has bill-backers threatening to put the question directly to voters with a 2010 ballot initiative if they fail in the legislature.

Sen. Evie Hudak, D-Westminster, said the bill has so stirred tensions among river users and property owners that she doubts a long-standing and sometimes uneasy truce — where local companies and residents work out private agreements — will ever return. “This reopens a wound that we had a couple of Band-Aids on. Now we’re scratching the heck out of it,” she said. “People are angry on both sides. There’s the threat of lawsuits and ballot initiatives.” Viewed by some as the swing vote on the Senate Judiciary Committee, slated to hear the bill March 17, Hudak has faced more pressure than many of her colleagues, including a robo-call to her constituents from bill supporters…

Meanwhile, scores of private rafters, kayakers and anglers have clamored to be covered by the bill. That outcry should give lawmakers pause, said Jim Idema, head of the Creekside Coalition formed in 1994 to fight off a ballot initiative to open private land to river users. “To bestow a navigation right on a single class of citizens is not going to sit well with the rest. They will be coming up behind and saying what about us?” Idema said. “Time has allowed the senators to say, ‘Now wait a minute. The implications here are very, very broad.’ ” Idema’s group opposes the bill, but he’s not counting on its slowed progress as a sign of sure defeat.

The legislation’s first blow in the Senate came with its committee appointment, said sponsor Sen. Mary Hodge, D-Brighton. HB 1188 landed in the judiciary committee, which focuses on the legal aspects of bills, instead of the business affairs committee, which may have been more sympathetic to arguments that the bill would save business owners and protect tourism…

The sudden turbulence surprised Bob Hamel, who heads a rafting industry group and saw a sportsman governor and a Democrat-controlled legislature as his industry’s chance to settle a long-standing dispute in their favor. He’s nonetheless confident of public support, though opponents argue Coloradans are just as eager to prevent the government from taking private property. “We didn’t think it would be an easy fight, and if we lose, there are huge potential risks,” Hamel said. “But if this goes to the open public, these people have no idea what’s coming their way.”

From The Pulse – Of Colorado Farm Bureau (Garin Vorthmann):

The controversial right-to-float bill has been scheduled to be heard in the Senate Judiciary Committee for March 17. Watch for more information. Keep up the good work and contact your Senators asking for a NO vote.

More 2010 Colorado legislation coverage here.

Colorado to release 303d list on Tuesday

A picture named mercuryincoloradodp.jpg

From The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel (Emily Anderson):

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment on Tuesday will adopt a lengthy list (pdf) of Colorado waters it has deemed impaired.

Despite the city of Grand Junction’s attempts to reverse the decision, the list likely will include Juniata Reservoir on Grand Mesa, which provides a majority of Grand Junction’s drinking water. The city temporarily closed the reservoir to visitors and fishermen before opening it again in late February, when the Health Department told the city the closure would not get the reservoir off the impaired-waters list…

Steve Gunderson, director of the state Health Department’s water-quality division, said most items on the list have water-contamination problems, but some areas get listed just for having active fish-consumption advisories, such as the one Juniata has…

City Attorney John Shaver said the city likely will offer suggestions to the Health Department staff about changing the methodology for listing bodies of water on the impaired list so the list would reflect water, and not fish, contamination.

More mercury pollution coverage here and here.