Colorado Water Congress Annual Convention Day 2 #CWCAC2025

Coyote Gulch near the confluence of the Little Snake and Yampa Rivers July 2021.

Click the link to view my posts on Bluesky (Click the “Latest” tab).

#Arizona Prepares for Legal Clash Over #ColoradoRiver With $1 Million Bill — Newsweek #COriver #aridification

The Colorado River’s Horseshoe Bend. Photo credit: Gert Boers/Unsplash

Click the link to read the article on the Newsweek website (Tom Howarth). Here’s an excerpt:

January 29, 2025

A bill advanced Tuesday by the Arizona House Committee on Natural Resources, Energy and Water aims to allocate $1 million to defend the Grand Canyon State’s water rights as part of the ongoing battle over the Colorado River. The bill, known as House Bill 2103, seeks to set aside the funds to support litigation in the event that negotiations among the seven states dependent on the river break down. Arizona is preparing for the possibility of legal action if the ongoing discussions fail to resolve water allocation disputes. The bill passed with unanimous support from the committee, thoughย Democratsย indicated they will propose an amendment to increase the allocation to $3 million, in line with Governorย Katie Hobbs‘ proposed budget…

At the center of the debate are two factions: the Upper Basin statesโ€”Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyomingโ€”and the Lower Basin states, which include Arizona, California and Nevada…But as the clock ticks down toward 2026, when potential cuts could be enforced by the federal government, tensions are mounting over the distribution of the river’s limited water supply…Arizona’s position is clear: it wants to be able to fight its corner if necessary and needs funds to do it. The request for funds to potentially fight a legal battle was first proposed in September 2024 by Tom Buschatzke, the director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

#Colorado water experts push for agreement on managing the #ColoradoRiverโ€™s future — Shannon Mullane (Fresh Water News) #COriver #aridification

Glen Canyon Dam creates water storage on the Colorado River in Lake Powell, which is just 27% full. Credit: U.S. Bureau of Reclamation

Click the link to read the article on the Water Education Colorado website (Shannon Mullane):

January 28, 2025

Itโ€™s time for an agreement in the Colorado River Basin, Colorado water and climate experts say.

Colorado River officials are at odds over how to store and release water in the basinโ€™s reservoirs when the current rules lapse in 2026. Publicly, state negotiators stick close to their original, competing proposals, released early in 2024. Colorado experts watching the process understand the difficulty โ€” itโ€™s painful to talk about cutting water use โ€” but time is of the essence.

Jennifer Pitt, the National Audubon Society’s Colorado River program director, paddles a kayak through a restoration site. (Source: Jesus Salazar, Raise the River)

โ€œI have no idea whatโ€™s going to get them to agreement,โ€ said Jennifer Pitt, the Colorado River program director for the National Audubon Society. โ€œTo me, the biggest pressure seems like time is running out.โ€

But there seems to be a lack of trust between the state negotiators, said Jennifer Gimbel, senior water policy scholar at the Colorado Water Center at Colorado State University.

โ€œNot only is there this lack of trust, but there almost seems to be this effort to promote your own proposals by denigrating other proposals,โ€ Gimbel said. โ€œThat frustrated me to no end. Itโ€™s like they have these political rallies.โ€ [ed. emphasis mine]

If states are going to propose a united plan, then they need to do it by the end of 2025, preferably sooner, experts said.

Two new reports offer glimpses into how officials envision the riverโ€™s future: a revised proposal from four states, including Colorado, submitted Dec. 30, and a new, in-depth report on the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s strategies, released Jan. 17.

โ€œWe continue to stand firmly behind the Upper Division Statesโ€™ Alternative, which performs best according to Reclamationโ€™s own modeling and directly meets the purpose and need of this federal action,โ€ Coloradoโ€™s negotiating team said in a prepared statement Tuesday.

The basin is also about to see new leadership at the federal level. Colorado water experts are waiting to know who President Donald Trump will appoint to key positions, like the commissioner of Reclamation and the assistant secretary for water and science.

โ€œTheyโ€™re in a really tough spot. I would understand that,โ€ said John Berggren with the environmental group Western Resource Advocates. โ€œI hope theyโ€™re continuing to negotiate and have productive conversations, and I hope theyโ€™re open to some more creative options.โ€

Planning for the extremes

So what options are they considering? In the absence of a seven-state agreement on how to manage the basinโ€™s water supply, the Bureau of Reclamation outlined five possible plans in November:

  • No action: Included as a formality and shows the risk of doing nothing
  • Federal authorities: Includes maximum Lower Basin cuts of 3.5 million acre-feet in extremely dry years
  • Federal authorities hybrid: Includes maximum cuts of 3.5 million acre-feet in the Lower Basin and conserving up to 200,000 acre-feet in the Upper Basin
  • Cooperative conservation: Includes maximum cuts of 4 million acre-feet in the Lower Basin and conserving up to 200,000 acre-feet in the Upper Basin
  • Basin hybrid: Includes maximum cuts of 2.1 million acre-feet in the Lower Basin and conserving up to 100,000 acre-feet in the Upper Basin

Colorado experts want to make sure the federal planning process is broad enough to include the  worst possible conditions.

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2024. Credit: Brad Udall

The Colorado River Basinโ€™s flows are about 20% lower now than in the 20th century, said Brad Udall, senior water and climate research scientist at the Colorado Water Center at Colorado State University. Thatโ€™s a drop from about 15.2 million acre-feet per year to about 12.4 million acre-feet, he said.

Thatโ€™s not enough for the 15 million acre-feet allotted to the seven U.S. states, much less the additional water owed to Mexico and tribal nations.

Udall wants to make sure officials are planning for scenarios in which the riverโ€™s flow drops by an additional 10%, or down to 11 million acre-feet.

โ€œThe question is โ€ฆ who takes the pain? Is it all Lower Basin? Is Upper Basin sharing that?โ€ he said.

Main takeaways and lingering questions

The Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s options include more than just how to cut back on water use, as explained in detail in the new alternatives report, released Jan. 17.

One new detail for the Colorado experts who reviewed the report was the duration of the next management plan: Reclamation wants it to last for at least 20 years after 2026. It is unlikely to be a short-term, interim plan to give negotiators more time to reach a unified agreement.

The revised proposal submitted by the Upper Basin states โ€” Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming โ€” also highlighted conserving up to 200,000 acre-feet of water (depending on river conditions), which seemed to move the states closer to alignment with Reclamation, experts said…

The Upper Basinโ€™s revised proposal, and the federal options, include different โ€œpoolsโ€ in Lake Powell on the Utah-Arizona border, which would function like savings accounts and could store water conserved by Upper Basin states. Colorado water experts are keeping a close eye on how these accounts might work.

โ€œPutting water in Powell is a good thing, but nobody in the Upper Basin wants to send water to protect Powell that ultimately just runs downstream,โ€ said Steve Wolff, general manager of the Southwestern Water Conservation District based in Durango.

The experts wanted to know more about how conservation pools would function; how federal authorities in the basin might expand; which reservoirs will be included in the plan; what the impacts to the Grand Canyon would be under the different plans; and ultimately, what plan will stabilize the system.

Theyโ€™ll have to wait to find out: The bureau is expected to release a deeper analysis of how each alternative could impact water management in different conditions later this year.

The Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s final selection will likely mix and match elements of the different alternatives, said Carly Jerla, senior water resource program manager with the Bureau of Reclamation in a December presentation in Las Vegas.

โ€œItโ€™s a shame we donโ€™t have a combined Upper Basin and Lower Basin plan right now,โ€ Udall said. โ€œOnce Reclamation does its modeling, weโ€™ll learn a lot. But we need a combined plan.โ€

More by Shannon Mullane

Map credit: AGU

#Arizona Governor Hobbs proposes adding over $60 million to defend Stateโ€™s waterย future — Doug MacEachern (Arizona Department of Water Resources) #aridification

Arizona Rivers Map via Geology.com.

Click the link to read the release on the ADWR website (Doug MacEachern):

January 30, 2025

A breakdown of water-related investments included in the recently released Executive Budget proposal from Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs:

$14.6M Deposit to WIFA Water Conservation Grant Fund

Governor Hobbs has now allocated $14.6 million to the Water Conservation Grant Fund to enable the Water Infrastructure Finance Authority (WIFA) to continue investing in generational water conservation projects.

Thanks to $200 million awarded by the State in federal funds allocated through the American Rescue Plan Act, WIFA has been able to fund conservation-focused projects across Arizona. To date, WIFA has funded over 150 water conservation projects. The Governorโ€™s 2025 Executive Budget proposal includes investments in current and future water solutions, including WIFAโ€™s funding for rural water supply development and long-term augmentation.

These critical resources will help ensure that rural areas can invest in the infrastructure they need to be water resilient, statewide efforts continue their investment in the infrastructure Arizona needs to find sustainable, renewable water supplies for the future. These investments speak directly to the mission of WIFA, which has been to augment and expand Arizonaโ€™s water supplies.

$12M Grant for City of Buckeye Renewable Water Infrastructure

By enrolling in the new Alternative Designation of 100-year Assured Water Supply (ADAWS) Program, the City of Buckeye has committed to increasing the sustainability of its water resource portfolio, a major step forward toward creating sustainable growth. This allocation of $12 million will help Buckeye build infrastructure to reuse its effluent supplies and recover them from a hydrologically connected area; facilitating sustainable growth and increased use of renewable water supplies.

  • $7M Statewide Groundwater Monitoring and Data Collection

These allocations will provide ADWR with much needed additional tools to ย ensure that Arizonaโ€™s groundwater resources are properly managed and protected. Governor Hobbs has invested $7 million to ADWR to install groundwater monitoring index wells throughout rural Arizona to observe declining groundwater levels and inform ongoing groundwater protection efforts. Without these index wells, ADWR hydrologists are less able to accurately assess the health of groundwater supplies in rural areas.

  • $5.5M For ADWR Hydrogeologic Studies in Priority Groundwater Basins

To help rural communities understand and protect their groundwater supplies, ADWR hydrologists create groundwater models that help water managers and community leaders understand the conditions of their aquifers. This $5.5 million investment will allow ADWR hydrogeologists to collect key hydrogeologic information to build these critical models in groundwater basins experiencing severe water declines.

  • $3.45M ADWR Leading Edge Satellite Water Monitoring Systems & Equipment

This investment with ADWR funds the acquisition and use of cutting-edge technologies including absolute gravity survey equipment to monitor aquifer conditions, funding for the Arizona Continuously Operating Reference Stations (AZCORS) Network that provides critical GPS data for scientists, engineers, and surveyors throughout Arizona. It provides funds for satellite monitoring of statewide water demand, and funding for ADWR contractual partnerships with the US Geological Survey (USGS) to collect key water use data.

#Colorado Water Congress Annual Convention Day 1: Russ George is the 2025 Aspinall Award recipient

Russ George recipent of the 2025 Aspinall Award at the Colorado Water Congress Annual Convention.

Here are my posts from yesterday via Bluesky (click on the “Latest” tab: https://bsky.app/search?q=%23CWCAC2025.

#Drought news January 30, 2025: In #Colorado, abnormally dry conditions and moderate drought expanded over the west, south and southwest portions of the state with a new area of severe drought added in the south

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:
This Week’s Drought Summary

A dry week dominated the weather over much of the country with only portions of southern California and in the South along the Gulf Coast recording significant precipitation for the week. The current week started with a significant, even historical, winter storm event that impacted the coastal areas of the Gulf Coast. Several locations set all-time records for snow amounts with some locations in Louisiana having 9-10 inches of snow for the event. Some locations in the Florida panhandle also recorded 6-9 inches of snow during this event. Colder-than-normal temperatures dominated the country with the coldest readings in the Southeast, where departures were 10-15 degrees below normal, and in the northern Rocky Mountains with similar departures from normal. Portions of the northern Plains were warmer than normal, with temperatures 5-10 degrees above normal in the Dakotas and into portions of eastern Montana and western Minnesota…

High Plains

Northern areas were warmer than normal with departures of 3-9 degrees above normal in the Dakotas and northeastern Montana. Colder-than-normal temperatures dominated the rest of the region with some areas of Wyoming 12-15 degrees below normal for the week. Areas of western South Dakota, southwest North Dakota, southeast Montana and northeast Wyoming improved this week as conditions over the last few months were reassessed and the indicators were not aligning with the drought depiction. In many instances the drought is still considered severe or worse, but where the intensity was reduced, it was due to not all the indicators converging to what was being shown. In Wyoming, conditions were improved in the central and southwest where severe and moderate drought as well as abnormally dry conditions were improved. Some extreme drought was extended in the Wind River where snow and precipitation numbers supported the change…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 28, 2025.

West

Temperatures were colder than normal over almost the entire region, with departures of 9-12 degrees below normal in the northern Rocky Mountains and 3-6 degrees below normal most other places. Most of the region was drier than normal this week with only some areas of southern California, western Arizona and eastern Montana recording above-normal precipitation. The dryness allowed for the expansion of moderate drought into the central valley of California where the water year has continued to be drier than normal. In Arizona, the winter continues to be on the dry side and allowed for the expansion of moderate, severe and extreme drought conditions over the western, northern and southern portions of the state. In Nevada, moderate and severe drought were expanded over the eastern part of the state and were also expanded in the southern portions of Utah. Abnormally dry and moderate drought conditions expanded over western Washington and abnormally dry conditions were filled in over northwest Montana. In Colorado, abnormally dry conditions and moderate drought expanded over the west, south and southwest portions of the state with a new area of severe drought added in the south…

Most of the region was dry for the week outside of those areas impacted by the winter storm that traversed across the Gulf Coast areas of Texas and into central Louisiana and Mississippi. Temperatures were cooler than normal over the entire region with the greatest departures over southern Louisiana into Mississippi where temperatures were 12-16 degrees below normal. Improvements were made to the abnormally dry conditions in Mississippi and in portions of east Texas. Severe and extreme drought was expanded in southern Texas with regards to the long-term drought signals in place, especially on the hydrologic systems in the region. Dryness continues in Tennessee with degradation in the southern, middle and eastern potions of the state as moderate, severe and extreme drought all expanded this week…

Looking Ahead

Over the next five to seven days, it is anticipated that some of the coastal areas of the Pacific Northwest could see some dryness alleviated with rains from northern California to Washington. Precipitation chances appear to be good over the northern and central Rocky Mountains. The most active rainfall pattern is expected to be from the southern Plains into the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic where some areas of Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas will see 2-3 inches of rain. Dry conditions will continue in the Southwest and northern Plains along with most of the Florida peninsula.

The 6-10 day outlooks show that the probability of below-normal temperatures is greatest in the Pacific Northwest and across the northern part of the United States into the High Plains. The best chances of above-normal temperatures will be over the Four-Corners region and along the southern tier of the U.S. into the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic. The greatest chances of above-normal precipitation will be over northern California into the Great Basin and the northern Rocky Mountains as well as over the Midwest. The best chances of seeing below-normal precipitation are over the Southwest and along the Gulf Coast of Florida.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 28, 2025.

#Colorado Water Congress Annual Convention #CWCAC2025

I’m at the Colorado Water Congress Annual Convention. The next 3 days should be a hoot!

Speaker Bios and Agenda: https://coloradowatercongress.growthzoneapp.com/ap/CloudFile/Download/pMmYw69p

Coyote Gulch, Bike to Work Day 2024. The photo was taken on the Clear Creek Trail on my way to the N-line Commuter Rail so I guess it was โ€œBike and Ride Trains to Work Dayโ€ for Coyote Gulch.

Gen Z Fears Clean Water Shortages, Displacement Due to #ClimateChange — Walton Family Foundation

Click the link to read the release on the Walton Family Foundation website (Mark Shields):

January 28, 2025

74% of Gen Zers say climate change threatens the clean water supply in the U.S.

WASHINGTON, D.C. โ€” Jan. 28, 2025 โ€” The Walton Family Foundation and Gallup released a new report today examining Gen Zโ€™s experiences with climate change and water issues, shedding light on their concerns about climate events and the potential impact on their generationโ€™s future. The research finds water issues top the list of Gen Zโ€™s climate worries, with individual perspectives shaped by diverse experiences and beliefs.

Of 12 climate-related issues measured in the study, majorities of Gen Zers express โ€œsomeโ€ or โ€œa great dealโ€ of worry about nine, including five related to water. This is true regardless of location, with water pollution and the health of fish and oceans ranking among the top three concerns in every U.S. Census region. While a majority of Gen Zers nationwide (61%) have reported experiencing a water-related climate issue in the past two years, water-related problems are more commonly reported by those in the Central and Western U.S.

When considering how these issues may affect their future, Gen Zers report concern about the availability of clean water and the potential need to relocate. Those who have experienced climate-related events at a higher rate are more likely to worry about these impacts . T here are notable differences across demographic groups. Hispanic (36%) and Black (34%) Gen Zers are more likely than their White (27%) peers to have experienced unsafe tap water . They are also more likely to believe there will not be enough clean water for their generation to live in the future (41% of Hispanic and 34% of Black Gen Zers, compared with 24% of W hite Gen Zers). Adult Gen Zers are significantly more likely to worry about needing to move due to climate change compared with their 12- to 17-year-old counterparts (40% vs. 27%, respectively).

Denver School Strike for Climate, September 20, 2019.

There is large-scale unity among young people on the importance of protecting water quality. Seventy-four percent of Gen Zers say it is โ€œvery importantโ€ to protect oceans, lakes and rivers from pollution, with another 19% saying it is โ€œsomewhat important.โ€ Gen Z acknowledges the adverse effects of climate change on water resources: 74% of Gen Zers say climate change impacts the amount of clean water available in the U.S. โ€œsomewhatโ€ (47%) or โ€œa great dealโ€ (27%). There is solid bipartisan agreement on the inadequacy of current water protection efforts: M ajorities of both Democratic (88%) and Republican (63%) Gen Z adults say the U.S. is โ€œprobablyโ€ or โ€œdefinitelyโ€ not doing enough to protect water.

โ€œGen Z is united in their deep concern for water protection and availability, recognizing it as a critical issue that touches us all โ€” regardless of where we live or who we are,โ€ said Moira Mcdonald, Environment Program Director at the Walton Family Foundation. โ€œAs we look to the future, there’s a growing sense of urgency. Young people fear inheriting a world where clean water is scarce and climate change continues to worsen. We need to work on solutions to ensure clean, safe water remains accessible for generations to come.โ€

Looking ahead, Gen Zers are pessimistic about the trajectory of climate change โ€” 67% believe climate change will worsen in their lifetime. And rates of pessimism are about 10 percentage points higher among those who have recently experienced a climate-related issue such as flooding, drought or unsafe tap water. Among voting-age Gen Zers, majorities of both Democrats and Republicans believe it is very or somewhat unlikely that climate change will be stopped.

Methodology

Results are based on a Gallup Panelโ„ข web survey conducted Aug. 6-14, 2024, with a sample of 2,832 12- to 27-year-olds from across the U.S. The Gallup Panel is a probability-based panel of U.S. adults. Data were weighted to match demographic targets of age, gender, education, race, Hispanic ethnicity and Census region for 12- to 27-year-olds, using the most recent five-year population estimates from the American Community Survey.

Twelve- to 17-year-old children, as well as some 18-year-olds, were reached through adult members of the Gallup Panel who indicated they had at least one child aged 18 or younger living in their household. The remaining 18- to 27-year-old respondents are members of the Gallup Panel.

For the total sample of 2,832 respondents, the margin of sampling error is +/-2.9 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Margins of error for subgroups are higher; selected subgroups are reported below. All margins of error reported are adjusted to account for the design effect.

Bone-dry winter in the San Juans — Allen Best (BigPivots.com) #SanJuanRiver #DoloresRiver #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification

Lee Ferry, the dividing line between the upper and lower basin states of the Colorado River Basin. Photo credit: Allen Best

Click the link to read the article on the Big Pivots website (Allen Best):

January 28, 2025

Itโ€™s part of a theme. Does Colorado need to start planning for potential Colorado River curtailments?

Snow in southwestern Colorado has been scarce this winter. Archuleta County recently had a grass fire. A store manager at Terryโ€™s Ace Hardware in Pagosa Springs tells me half as many snowblowers have been sold this winter despite new state rebates knocking 30% off the price of electric models.

Near Durango, snowplows normally used at a subdivision located at 8,000 feet remain unused. At Chapman Hill, the in-town ski area, all snow remains artificial, and itโ€™s not enough to cover all the slopes. A little natural snow would help, but none is in the forecast.

Snow may yet arrive. Examining data collected on Wolf Creek Pass since 1936, the Pagosa Sunโ€™s Josh Kurz found several winters that procrastinated until February. Even when snow arrived, though, the winter-end totals were far below average.

All this suggests another subpar runoff in the San Juan and Animas rivers. They contribute to Lake Powell, one of two big water bank accounts on the Colorado River. When I visited the reservoir in May 2022, water levels were dropping rapidly. The manager of Glen Canyon Dam pointed to a ledge below us that had been underwater since the mid-1960s. It had emerged only a few weeks before my visit.

That ledge at Powell was covered again after an above-average runoff in 2023. The reservoir has recovered to 35% of capacity.

A ledge that had been used in the construction of Glen Canyon Dam emerged in spring 2022 after about 50 years of being underwater.  Photo May 2022/Allen Best

Will reservoir levels stay that high? Probably not, and that is a significant problem. Delegates who wrangled the Colorado River Compact in a lodge near Santa Fe in 1922 understood drought, at least somewhat. They did not contemplate the global warming now underway.

In apportioning the river flows, they also assumed an average 17.5 million acre-feet at Lee Ferry, the dividing line between the upper and lower basins. Itโ€™s a few miles downstream from Glen Canyon Dam and upstream from the Grand Canyon. Even during the 20th century the river was rarely that generous. This century it has become stingy, with average annual flows of 12.5 million acre-feet. Some worry that continued warming during coming decades may further cause declines to 9.5 million acre-feet.

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2024. Credit: Brad Udall

Colorado State Universityโ€™s Brad Udall and other scientists contend half of declining flows should be understood as resulting from warming temperatures. A 2024 study predicts droughts with the severity that formerly occurred once in 1,000 years will by mid-century become 1-in-60 year events.

How will the seven basin states share this diminished river? Viewpoints differ so dramatically that delegates from the upper- and lower-basin states loathed sharing space during an annual meeting in Las Vegas as had been their custom. Legal saber-rattling abounds. A critical issue is an ambiguous clause in the compact about releases of water downstream to Arizona and hence Nevada and California.

Colorado transmountain diversions via the State Engineer’s office

Might Colorado need to curtail its diversions from the Colorado River? That would be painful. Roughly half the water for cities along the Front Range, where 88% of Coloradans live, comes from the Colorado River and its tributaries. Transmountain diversions augment agriculture water in the South Platte and Arkansas River valleys. The vast majority of those water rights were adjudicated after the compact of 1922 and hence would be vulnerable to curtailment. Many water districts on the Western Slope also have water rights junior to the compact.

In Grand Junction last September, Andy Mueller, the general manager of the Colorado River Water Conservation District, the primary water policy agency for 15 of Western Slope counties, made the case that Colorado should plan for compact curtailments โ€” just in case. The district had earlier sent a letter to Jason Ullmann, the state water engineer, asking him to please get moving with compact curtailment rules.

Eric Kuhn, Muellerโ€™s predecessor at the district, who is now semi-retired, made the case for compact curtailment planning in the Spring 2024 issue of Colorado Environmental Law Review. Kuhnโ€™s piece runs 15,000 words, all of them necessary to sort through the tangled complexities. Central is the compact clause that specifies the upper basin states must not cause the flow at Lee Ferry, just below todayโ€™s Glen Canyon Dam, to be depleted below an aggregate of 75 million acre-feet on a rolling 10-years basis.

That threshold has not yet been met โ€” yet. Kuhn describes a โ€œrecipe for disasterโ€ if it is. He foresees those with agriculture rights on the Western Slope being called upon to surrender rights. He and Mueller argue for precautionary planning. That planning โ€œcould be contentious,โ€ Kuhn concedes, but the โ€œadvantages of being prepared for the consequences of a compact curtailment outweigh the concern.โ€

Last October, after Muellerโ€™s remarks in Grand Junction, I solicited statements from Colorado state government. The Polis administration said it would be premature to plan compact curtailment. The two largest single transmountain diverters of Colorado River Water, Denver Water and Northern Water, concurred.

Front Range cities, including Berthoud, above, are highly reliant upon water imported from the Colorado River and its tributaries. December 2023 photo/Allen Best

Recently, I talked with Jim Lochhead. For 25 years he represented Colorado and its water users in interstate Colorado River matters. He ran the stateโ€™s Department of Natural Resources for four years in the 1990s and, ending in 2023, wrapped up 13 years as chief executive of Denver Water. Lochhead, who stressed that he spoke only for himself, similarly sees compact curtailment planning as premature.

โ€œIt just doesnโ€™t make sense to go through that political brain damage until we really have to,โ€ he said. โ€œHopefully we wonโ€™t have to, because (the upper and lower basins) will come up with a solution.โ€

Lochhead does believe that a negotiated solution remains possible, despite the surly words of recent years…

โ€œWe need to figure out ways to negotiate an essentially shared sacrifice for how weโ€™re going to manage the system, so it can be sustainable into the future,โ€ he said. This, he says, will take cooperation that so far has been absent, at least in public, and it will also take money.

Instead, weโ€™ll have to slog along. The runoff in the Colorado River currently is predicted to be 81% of average. It fits with a theme. Unlike the children of Lake Wobegone, most runoffs in the 21st century have been below average.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

North Fork Valley team wins prize for innovative agrivoltaics project — Pete Kolbenschlag and Brandy Emesal (#Colorado Farm and Food Alliance) #GunnisonRiver

Vegetable harvest at an agravoltaic operation. Photo credit: Colorado Farm & Food Alliance

Click the link to read the release on the Colorado Farm and Food Alliance website (Pete Kolbenschlag and Brandy Emesal):

Colorado Farm & Food Alliance leads effort to advance in Department of Energy Community Power Accelerator Prize

HOTCHKISS, CO (January 27, 2025) โ€” The U.S. The Department of Energy (DOE) announced this
month that a North Fork Valley solar partnership is one of four teams to win a national $200,000
Community Power Accelerator Prize. The North Fork based team now advances to the third and final
round, and a $150,000 prize, in this community solar competition sponsored by the DOE National Solar
Energy Technologies Office.

The Colorado Farm and Food Alliance-led team seeks to advance several community-based solar projects that prioritize agriculture, community benefit and renewable energy generation. The
Accelerator Prize award will be used for engineering and other studies at Thistle Whistle Community
Solar project near Hotchkiss and to study the feasibility of a second installation at a former coal mine
site near Paonia. Both locations are in Delta County, Colorado.

Partners in developing these projects include Colorado Farm & Food Alliance, Thistle Whistle
Community Solar, Mirasol Agrivoltaics and Switchback Restoration, along with community leaders. The
award will help to advance at least two community solar projects, starting with a small agrivoltaic array
at Thistle Whistle Farm near Hotchkiss. This innovative project will pair agricultural production with solar
energy and provide clean power to local farms and residents through the Delta Montrose Electric
Association (DMEA) grid.

โ€œI am eager to see this project completed, to benefit my farm and to help provide energy cost savings to
other local farms and households,โ€ said Mark Waltermire, owner of Thistle Whistle Farm. โ€œThe
Community Power prize has been vital in helping to keep this project moving forward.โ€
Now completing pre-development, the Thistle Whistle Community Solar project will:

  • Generate clean, renewable energy for local communities
  • Preserve agricultural land through dual-use farming practices
  • Increase energy equity through community-solar, returning cost savings to system subscribers
  • Create new economic opportunities for local farmers
  • Support local food systems while advancing clean energy goals
  • Document best practices for agrivoltaic system design and lessons learned for community solar
  • Monitor wildlife corridors and habitat enhancement
  • Research water conservation benefits in dual-use systems
  • Demonstrate pollinator-friendly vegetation management
  • Study microclimatic effects on crop yields

The second project is in early pre-development, but will help support mine-site remediation and climate
harm reduction at a former coal mine as well as provide an additional community-solar benefit.
“This recognition from the Department of Energy validates our vision for community-based rural
renewables that support both our agricultural heritage and greater energy equity,” said Pete
Kolbenschlag, with the Colorado Farm and Food Alliance and prize team captain. “These projects
demonstrate how rural communities can lead the way in innovative clean energy solutions that preserve
farmland, benefit residents and integrate with local livelihoods.”
The North Fork Valley team is still participating in this national competition. In the third, and final, round
teams must demonstrate that they have secured the funding necessary to develop their community
solar projects. As part of the Phase 3 competition, the project team will be able to present their vision at
the Community Power PitchFest event at the DOE Headquarters in Washington, D.C. on March 6,

The Community Power Accelerator Prize is part of the American Made Challenge program, with
funding coming from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law passed by Congress in 2021.
As part of its mission, the Colorado Farm and Food Alliance provides a platform for rural leadership to
develop and implement local solutions that model climate action and strengthen farm and food system
resilience. It is the named partner of the Community Power Accelerator Prize.

Mirasol Agrivoltaics is a recently established Colorado nonprofit with a mission to educate about and to
help develop community solar projects in the North Fork Valley. With this award it will be able to fill a
new and needed leadership role in supporting clean energy, cost savings, and community-based
solutions through the Thistle Whistle Community Solar and future projects.

Learning and demonstration gardens at Arbol Farm, Paonia, CO. Photo credit: Colorado Farm and Food Alliance

#CRWUA2024 Through the Eyes of Young Professionals — Oliver Skelly,ย Aidan Stearns, and Andrew Teegarden (Getches-Wilkinson Center) #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification

Colorado River “Beginnings”. Photo: Brent Gardner-Smith/Aspen Journalism

Click the link to read the article on the Getches-Wilkinson Center website (Oliver Skelly,ย Aidan Stearns, and Andrew Teegarden):

December 17, 2024

The Annual Colorado River Water Users Association (CRUWA) Conference in Las Vegas was one of the busiest in recent years. Part of the increased participation stems from the current impasse in negotiations for the Post-2026 Operating Guidelines for Lakes Powell and Mead. Tensions could be felt in the hallways and discussions by nearly 1,500 attendees.

Pressures came to a head during the Upper and Lower Basin Panels. Coloradoโ€™s lead negotiator, Becky Mitchell, noted it was disappointing that all seven of the basin states were in Las Vegas and were unable to set a meeting where potential compromises could be discussed. Another Upper Basin Negotiator, Brandon Gebhart, spoke out against the posturing and inability to compromise.

Others on the Lower Basin Panel, such as JB Hamby, struck a different chord; the Lower Basin has been taking steps to lower water use despite the massive population, agricultural economy, and climate change. These realities are extremely troubling because it seems to be further entrenching the states in their own positions and is reducing their ability to compromise. In fact, Arizonaโ€™s Governor Katie Hobbs has begun setting aside money within the state budget for potential litigation efforts on the Colorado River. However, litigation did not seem to be the preferred alternative to solve the current breakdown in negotiations. A separate panel talked about the realities of litigation which could take decades, cost millions of dollars, and put the power to decide the outcome in the hands of judges which cannot fully capture the complexity and needs of each community partner along the river.

Outside of the programming, the entire Getches-Wilkinson Center Staff was honored to attend the Water & Tribes Initiative Luncheon which kicked off the start of the conference. During the lunch, attendees discussed potential alternatives for the Bureau of Reclamation to consider which would provide operational flexibility and account for tribal water usage.

Another highlight was the ability to talk with other colleagues and peers in the water space. Networking at large conferences has been one of the best parts of these events because they allow for more understanding within the water community. Despite the tensions, the water community was able to come together and discuss how we can solve the problems on the Colorado River equitably.

Unfortunately, CRUWA did not result in any big break through or give the states more clarity on how the Colorado will be managed. Although, leaders painted a clear picture of how difficult litigation will become if we are unable to agree. Complex scenarios require complex solutions and until someone can capture and account for all of them, compromise may be difficult to obtain. Allowing compromise and the goal of a stable river basin to drive the creation of alternatives will bring us to a place where all who utilize the river feel heard. Negotiators can get there, but it will take more time and dedicated effort to do so.

Aidan Stearns current 3L at Colorado Law and GWC Research Assistant:

From December 4-6, a variety of Colorado River advocates including lawyers, engineers, legislators, scientists, and tribal representatives gathered at the Paris Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada for the Colorado River Water Users Association (CRWUA) Conference. This year, which was my first time attending the conference, CRWUA was focused on post-2026 operations of the Colorado River. Negotiations over post-2026 operations have been contentious, to say the least. CRWUA served as an opportunity to share all the various points of view with the Colorado River community.

Since it was my first time attending CRWUA, I had one simple goal heading into the conference: listen. CRWUA further affirmed a belief I held when I started law school almost three years ago: that a degree in environmental engineering would be a beneficial foundation for legal practice. One of the first sessions I attended was about the risks of litigation, where attorneys representing various upper and lower basin interests discussed what the path of litigation may look like based on past precedent. Those panelists are often tasked with the challenge of applying modern engineering and scientific concepts to legal doctrine dating back to the 1800s, something I hope to pursue in my own legal career.

Outside of the conference sessions, my most impactful interactions came from meeting conference attendees and listening to their unique perspective on Colorado River water issues. I spoke to a range of individuals including attorneys who worked solely with upper basin agricultural water users to lower basin tribal councilmembers.

Despite the difficult conversations that were had at CRWUA regarding post-2026 operations, a thread of hope seemed to weave through every session. Julie Vano, the Research Director for Aspen Global Change Institute, emphasized in a panel on extreme weather events the importance of not becoming paralyzed by uncertainty when using models. Panelists also expressed that they felt hope because of the resilience of people. Panelists expressed that there is no one to blame but us, but in that, there is hope in the innovation and partnership that people are capable of. No one person is going to have the magic solution to managing water issues in the Colorado River Basin. The solution is going to come from collaboration along with being able to listen to and respect the perspectives that people bring to the table.

Oliver Skelly, current 3L at Colorado Law and GWC Conscience Bay Company Western Water Policy Fellow:

When the GWC invited me to spend the week before final exams with them in Las Vegas I could hardly contain my excitement: My first CRWUA! And what a time for it, with the ongoing negotiations over the post-2026 guidelines atop the agenda. Studying could wait.

As the conference unfolded, most of what I’d heard about CRWUA’s substance proved true: If you wanted platitudes, pay attention to the panels; if you wanted juicy hot takes, plug yourself into the hallway conversations. “The Upper Basin can’t just keep saying no to everything!” “Lots of snarky remarks from the Lower Basin today.” One attendee told me the words “climate change” were not even allowed in the agenda 10 years ago – a shocking and rather unnerving remark given where things stand now. (Fortunately for all involved, it’s allowed now.)

That said, the official events were not without their fireworks. The threat of litigation has entered the discourse as negotiations appear to be breaking down, and both basin panels made that abundantly clear. And the conference had many other panels discussing interesting ideas, including recent developments with tribal water rights, regenerative agriculture, urban water efficiency measures, and Kevin Fedarko discussing his new book about his walk through the Big Ditch. Still, the large, seemingly immovable rift between Upper and Lower Basin proposals remained center stage. 

The ultimate takeaway is nothing new: The future of the Colorado River remains uncertain. But CRWUA lives on, and it has found itself a new repeat customer. Many thanks to the GWC and its sponsors for making this trip possible for me.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

The January 2025 24-month study is a major caution sign for the #ColoradoRiver Basin — Eric Kuhn, John Fleck, and Jack Schmidt (InkStain.net) #COriver #aridification

The Tripwire. Credit: InkStain.net

Click the link to read the article on the InkStain.net website (Eric Kuhn, John Fleck, and Jack Schmidt):

January 22, 2025

On January 16th, the Bureau of Reclamation released the January 2025 24-Month Study. Based on the January 1st runoff forecast into Lake Powell, the projected โ€œmost probableโ€ annual release from Glen Canyon Dam for Water Year 2026 is now 7.48 maf. This needs to be taken as a significant caution sign because it shows that we are on a clear trajectory to hit what Coloradoโ€™s Jim Lochhead first called the 1922 Compactโ€™s first โ€œtripwireโ€ (82.5 maf/10-year) as early as 2027. Given the current stalemate between the Upper and Lower Division States over how the reservoir system should be operated, it means the potential for basin-wide litigation is now in the โ€œRed Zone.โ€

The January 24-Month study is the first in each water year to be based on a published forecast from the Colorado Basin River Forecast Centerโ€™s runoff model โ€“ the first to be based on actual snowpack. The January 1st runoff forecast for unregulated April-July inflow to Lake Powell was 5.15 maf (about 81% of average). This results in a projected 12/31/2025 elevation of Lake Powell of less than 3575โ€™ making the annual release for Water Year 2026 7.48 maf. Of course, the forecast will change as the winter progresses. In fact, the January mid-month forecast dropped by 300,000 acre-feet to 4.85 maf. At this point in the winter our confidence in the โ€œmost probableโ€ forecast is low and in recent years, the track record has been to overstate future runoff suggesting that the we should pay equal attention to the โ€œminimum probableโ€ forecast. (See Wang et al, Evaluating the Accuracy of Reclamationโ€™s 24-Month Study Lake Powell Projections.) Also remember that the actual decision on the WY 2026 release is not made until the Spring runoff is over and the August 24-Month study is released.

Lee/Leeโ€™s/Lees Ferry on the Colorado River. Photo by John Fleck

A 7.48 maf release from Glen Canyon Dam bodes trouble for the basin because it takes us very close to the tripwire. Simply put, the tripwire is the ten-year flow at Lee Ferry at which the Lower Division States can claim the Upper Division States are in violation of the 1922 Compact. Under the compact, the Upper Division States have two specific flow obligations at Lee Ferry: (1) to not cause the ten-year flow to be depleted below 75 maf every ten consecutive years, and (2) to deliver one half of the annual delivery to Mexico under the 1944 Treaty if the โ€œsurplusโ€ is not sufficient. If there is no surplus and the delivery to Mexico is 1.5 maf/year, the Upper Divisionโ€™s share is 750,000 af/year, resulting in a total ten-year delivery obligation of 82.5 maf. Since under Minute 323, Mexico shares in mainstem shortages, recent annual deliveries have been less than 1.5 maf. To keep the math simple, letโ€™s call the current obligation (with no surplus) 82.0 maf. With a 7.48 maf release in WY 2026, the ten-year flow for 2017-2026 will be about 82.8 maf.

Keep in mind that the obligation of the Upper Division States to Mexico under the 1922 Compact has been a disputed issue since the Treaty was signed in 1944. The Lower Division believes there is no current surplus, thus the obligation is one half of the Treaty delivery. The Upper Division believes that since the Lower Basin is currently overusing its 1922 Compact apportionment, this overuse is surplus, and thus, must be delivered to Mexico. Following this thread, if the overuse is greater than 1.5 maf/year, the Upper Division would have no obligation to Mexico.

With an 82.8 maf ten-year flow at the end of Water Year 2026, the Upper Division States are still slightly above the tripwire with a cushion of about 800,000 af. The problem is what happens in the next one to three years. From 2015-2019 annual the annual Glen Canyon Dam releases were 9.0 maf/year. Note, the annual release from Glen Canyon Dam and the flow at Lee Ferry are not quite the same, the Paria River and leakage around the dam contribute another 100,000 -150,000 af/year to the flow at Lee Ferry (bonus flows). Because of the way the ten-year math works, at the end of WY 2027, the Lee Ferry flow for WY 2017 (~9.2 maf) will drop out and be replaced by the 2027 Lee Ferry flow, thus, to keep the ten-year flow greater than 82.0 maf, the 2027 flow will have to be at least 8.4 maf. AND, there are two more 9.0 maf releases in the pipeline, WYs2018 and 2019! That means that when those drop out of the sequence, the risk of the basin stumbling across the tripwire into litigation grows.

To stay above 82.0 maf, the total deliveries at Lee Ferry for the three-year period of 2027-2029, the annual release from Glen Canyon Dam will have to average about 8.8 maf/year (factoring in the bonus flows). Since 2012, the average unregulated inflow to Lake Powell is about 8.2 maf/year. After deducting 500,000 af/year of gross evaporation from the reservoir, the โ€œnet-of-evaporationโ€ annual inflow is only about 7.7 maf/year. Going back to 2000, the net inflow is about 7.9 maf/year. Thus, to avoid going below the 82.0 maf tripwire, it will take either above average (post-2000) hydrology or continuing to draw down Lake Powell levels. If the hydrology is a bit drier than the post-2000 (or post-2012) levels, maintaining at least 82.0 maf/10-year may require drawing Lake Powell below minimum power. As Lake Powell levels approach minimum power, we approach environmental and power generation tripwires.

The fact that weโ€™re on track for another year of below-average inflows to Lake Powell, another 7.48 maf/year annual release from Glen Canyon Dam, and on a trajectory to drop below a 1922 Compact tripwire adds another level of urgency for the basin states to break their current impasse over the how the system will be operated post-2026. The chances of Lee Ferry flows dropping below the 82 maf tripwire are high. The Colorado River Basin needs to be fully prepared before this occurs. With every 24-Month study, the basinโ€™s litigation clock is getting closer and closer to that midnight hour.

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2024. Credit: Brad Udall

Money for the #ColoradoRiver faces an uncertain fate under Trump — Alex Hager (KUNC.org)

The Colorado River flows through the Shoshone diversion structure on Jan. 29, 2024. A group trying to purchase Shoshone’s water was set to receive $40 million from the federal government. Their efforts, along with dozens of other projects across the West, will have to wait. Photo credit: Alex Hager/KUNC

Click the link to read the article on the KUNC.org website (Alex Hager):

January 27, 2024

This story is part of ongoing coverage of the Colorado River, produced by KUNC and supported by the Walton Family Foundation.

Payments to help Western states respond to drought are on pause after an order from President Donald Trump. A pool of $388.3 million from the Inflation Reduction Act had already been allocated to fund water conservation projects by the Biden administration, and its future now hangs in the balance.

The Colorado River supplies water for about 40 million people from Wyoming to Mexico, but its stretched thin. Climate change is cutting into supplies, and the cities and farms that depend on it are struggling to cut back on demand. Federal funding has been a pivotal part of Western statesโ€™ response to that reality, with billions of dollars from the Biden administration helping pay for a wide variety of programs โ€“ incentivizing farmers to use less water on their crops, improving wildlife habitat and much more.

This latest tranche of money was originally destined for projects in Colorado, Utah, Wyoming, New Mexico, and four different Native American tribes. A specific list of projects the Biden Administration wanted to fund was released in the waning days of its time in the White House. Days later, shortly after his inauguration, President Trump signed an executive order calling for the government to โ€œimmediately pause disbursement of funds appropriated under the Inflation Reduction Act.โ€

Those awaiting the federal funds hope that the pause is only temporary.

Steve Wolff, general manager of the Southwestern Water Conservation District in Durango, Colorado, is awaiting news on the fate of $25.6 million originally designated for his group to improve habitats in wetlands and streams.

โ€œI just hope that both Democrats and Republicans across the West recognize the importance of this funding and what it does for local communities,โ€ Wolff said. โ€œAnd that they will be able to push the right political buttons in D.C. to make this money get distributed as it was presented by the Bureau of Reclamation.โ€

Officials with the Bureau of Reclamation, the federal agency which manages dams and reservoirs across the West, did not respond to KUNCโ€™s request for comment.

A moose walks alongside the Green River in Sublette County, Wyoming on March 27, 2024. A project to improve riparian habitat along the Green River is among those awaiting details on $388.3 million in federal grants. Photo credit: Alex Hager/KUNC

The list of projects awaiting funding is long. Colorado alone accounts for 16 different projects, all of which are awaiting at least half a million dollars. Money was also allocated to ten projects in Utah, five in Wyoming, two in New Mexico, six on tribal land and three that span state lines.

Utahโ€™s Division of Wildlife Resources would receive up to $37.2 million for five different projects. A spokeswoman for that agency told KUNC that its experts โ€œseem confidentโ€ that the projects will still be funded, and the agency understands the federal pause on Inflation Reduction Act funding to be more focused on energy-related programs.

Shoshone Hydroelectric Plant back in the days before I-70 via Aspen Journalism

The single largest grant in the funding pool is for the Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project in Colorado. The Colorado River District is in the midst of a yearslong push to buy water currently used by a hydroelectric plant and make sure it keeps flowing to Western Colorado. The plan would quell long-held anxieties that a fast-growing city in the Denver area could buy the water instead. The agency has been slowly pooling money from local governments towards its $99 million goal, but this federal grant of up to $40 million represents the biggest chunk of money it would put toward the purchase.

Alex Funk, a water policy expert at the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership, said the government typically has a lengthy review process for grants like these, and the Biden Administration reviewed and announced them extraordinarily quickly.

โ€œWe’re certainly anticipating a thoughtful review of some of these awards,โ€ Funk said. โ€œBut we’re hoping that that momentum continues.โ€

Some of Funkโ€™s work receives funding from the Walton Family Foundation, which also supports KUNCโ€™s Colorado River coverage.

While Trumpโ€™s team has given relatively few indications about how it will deal with Colorado River matters, Interior Secretary nominee Doug Burgum spoke about them briefly during a Senate confirmation hearing. Funk called those comments โ€œlargely encouraging,โ€ especially when it comes to the tense negotiations about water sharing between states that use the Colorado River.

โ€œ[Burgum] certainly signaled that he wanted his agency to be supportive of ongoing dialog and collaboration to keep that process on track,โ€ Funk said.

Shortly after Trump won the 2024 election, top water negotiators said they did not expect the new president to shake up their talks, and said federal water policymakers have typically been technocrats, shielded from partisan turnover in Washington, D.C.

In December, a number of water policy experts expressed concern about the future of federal funding after the Biden Administration supplied Colorado River users with a โ€œonce-in-a-generation windfall.โ€

Trump unravels US climate agenda as he promises to โ€˜drill, baby, drillโ€™ — Joseph Wintersย &ย Naveena Sadasivam (Grist.org)

John Kerry, then U.S. secretary of state, with China’s special representative on climate change, Xie Zhenhua, at the 2015 Paris climate conference. FRANCOIS MORI / AP PHOTO

Click the link to read the article on the Grist website (Joseph Wintersย &ย Naveena Sadasivam):

January 20, 2025

Within hours of being sworn into office on Monday, President Donald Trump announced a spate of executive orders and policies to boost oil and gas production, roll back environmental protections, withdraw from the Paris climate accord, and undo environmental justice initiatives enacted by former president Joe Biden.

Conventional wisdom โ€” and political donations โ€” would indicate that Republicans are friendlier than Democrats to the oil and gas industry. And, in fact, thatโ€™s probably true: Democrats are more likely to pass regulations on drilling; Republicans are more likely to give oil corporations massive tax cuts. But in spite of all of that, Over the last fifty years, Republican presidents have been more likely to oversee crude oil production declines, while production has generally increased under Democrats, with the exception of the Clinton administration. In fact, the current surge in production began during Obamaโ€™s first year, and has continued through Bidenโ€™s entire term. This doesnโ€™t mean that Democrats spur production. What it means is that more regulations donโ€™t hamper production, and rescinding those regulations โ€” and corporate tax cuts โ€” donโ€™t spur production. There are many forces in play, and the occupant of the White House is merely one of them, and a relatively insignificant one at that. Source: EIA, Land Desk.

Trump has called climate change a โ€œhoax,โ€ and appointed oil industry executives and climate skeptics to his Cabinet. His first-day actions represent a complete remaking of the countryโ€™s climate agenda, and set the tone for his administrationโ€™s approach to energy and the environment over the next four years.

โ€˜Drill, baby, drillโ€˜

Among the most significant actions Trump took Monday was declaring โ€œan energy emergency,โ€ which he framed as part of his effort to rein in inflation and reduce the cost of living. He pledged to โ€œuse all necessary resources to build critical infrastructure,โ€ an unprecedented move that could grant the White House greater authority to expand fossil fuel production. He also signed an executive order โ€œto encourage energy exploration and production on federal lands and waters, including on the Outer Continental Shelf,โ€ and another expediting permitting and leasing in Alaska, including in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. 

โ€œWe will have the largest amount of oil and gas of any country on Earth, and we are going to use it,โ€ Trump said during his inaugural address. โ€œWe are going to drill, baby, drill.โ€

The U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve can store 714 million barrels of crude oil, but currently holds about 395 million. Under his administration, he said, the cache will be filled โ€œup again right to the top.โ€ He also said the country will export energy โ€œall over the world.โ€

โ€œWe will be a rich nation again,โ€ he said, standing inside the Capitol Rotunda, โ€œand it is that liquid gold under our feet that will help.โ€

Richard Klein, a senior research fellow for the international nonprofit Stockholm Environment Institute, noted that fossil fuel companies extracted record-high amounts of oil and gas during the Biden administration. Even if it is technologically possible to boost production further, itโ€™s unclear whether that will reduce prices. 

Dan Kammen, a professor of energy at the University of California, Berkeley, said it is a โ€œdirect falsehoodโ€ that increasing fossil fuel extraction would drive down inflation. He agreed that the U.S. should declare a national energy emergency โ€” but for reasons exactly the opposite of what Trump had in mind. โ€œWe need to quickly move to clean energy, to invest in new companies across the U.S.,โ€ Kammen told Grist.

Denver Waterโ€™s sustainability operations include generating energy from solar power panels installed on the roof of its Administration Building, parking garage and over its visitorโ€™s parking lot at its Operations Complex near downtown. Photo credit: Denver Water.

Exiting the Paris Agreement (again)

Trump delivered on his promise to once again withdraw from the 2015 Paris Agreement, the United Nations pact agreed upon by 195 countries to limit global warming that the new president referred to on Monday as a โ€œrip-off.โ€ In addition to signing an executive order saying the U.S. would leave the agreement โ€” titled Putting America First in International Environmental Agreements โ€” Trump also signed a letter to the United Nations to set the departure in motion. Due to the rules governing the accord, it will take one year to formally withdraw, meaning U.S. negotiators will participate in the next round of talks in Brazil at the end of the year. By this time next year, however, the U.S. could join Iran, Libya, and Yemen as the only nations that arenโ€™t part of the accord. 

โ€œIt simply makes no sense for the United States to voluntarily give up political influence and pass up opportunities to shape the exploding green energy market,โ€ Ani Dasgupta, president and CEO of the nonprofit World Resources Institute, said in a statement. Only 2 in 10 Americans support quitting the Paris Agreement, according to a poll by the Associated Press.

Trumpโ€™s announcement came just 10 days after the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration declared 2024 Earthโ€™s hottest year on record, one marked by life-threatening heat waves, wildfires, and flooding around the world. Experts say things will only get worse unless the U.S. and other countries do more to limit greenhouse gas emissions. 

โ€œMuch of the very fabric of life on Earth is imperiled,โ€ climate scientists wrote last October. They noted then, even before Trumpโ€™s election, that global policies were expected to cause temperatures to climb 2.7 degrees Celsius (6.9 degrees Fahrenheit) by 2100. One analysis by Carbon Brief estimated that a second Trump administration would result in an extra 4 billion metric tons of climate pollution, negating all of the emissions savings from the global deployment of clean energy technologies over the past five years โ€” twice over.

Coyote Gulch’s Leaf in Byers Canyon on the way to Steamboat Springs August 21, 2017.

Reversing course on electric vehicles 

Trump also took action to revoke โ€œthe electric vehicle mandate,โ€ in keeping with his campaign promise to support autoworkers.

โ€œIn other words, youโ€™ll be able to buy the vehicle of your choice,โ€ he said during his inaugural address โ€” even though there isย no national mandateย requiring the sale of electric vehicles and consumers are free to purchase any vehicle of their liking. [ed. emphasis mine] The Biden administration did promote the technology by finalizing rules that limit the amount ofย tailpipe pollution over time so thatย electric vehicles make up the majority of automobiles sold by 2032. Under Biden, the U.S. also launched aย $7,500 tax creditย for consumer purchases of EVs manufactured domestically and planned to funnel roughlyย $7.5 billionย toward building charging infrastructure across the country.ย 

โ€œRolling back incentives to build electric vehicles in the United States is going to cost jobs as well as raise the price of travel,โ€ said Costa Samaras, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Carnegie Mellon University who served as a senior policy leader in the Biden White House. โ€œFueling up an electric vehicle costs between one-third and one-half as much as driving on gasoline, not to mention the benefits for reducing air pollution. Ultimately, to lower the price of energy for U.S. consumers, we need to diversify the sources of energy that weโ€™re using and ensure that these are clean, affordable, and reliable.โ€

Youth activists rally for climate justice in front of the US Capitol in Washington,DC (photo from earlier in the year). Image: Lorie Shaull,CC BY-SA 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

Rescinding environmental justice initiatives

Trump signed a single executive order undoing nearly 80 Biden administration initiatives, including rescinding a directive to federal agencies to incorporate environmental justice into their missions. The Biden-era policy protected communities overburdened by pollution and directed agencies to work more closely with them.  

That move was part of a broader push that Trump described as an attempt to create a โ€œcolor-blind societyโ€ by stopping the government from โ€œtrying to socially engineer race and gender into every aspect of public and private life.โ€ Klein said the objective was โ€œembarrassing.โ€ Kammen said it was a โ€œhuge mistakeโ€ to move away from environmental justice priorities.

Cheyenne Ridge, located between Burlington and Cheyenne Wells, near the Kansas border, is one of many wind projects on Coloradoโ€™s eastern plains. Soon, new transmission will enable far more wind and solar projects. Photos/Allen Best Photo credit: Allen Best/The Mountain Town News

Blocking new wind energy 

Trump officially barred new offshore wind leases and will review federal permitting of wind projects, making good on a promise to โ€œend leasing to massive wind farms that degrade our natural landscapes and fail to serve American energy consumers.โ€ The move is likely to be met with resistance from members of his own party. The top four states for wind generation โ€” Texas, Iowa, Oklahoma, and Kansas โ€” are solidly red, and unlikely to acquiesce. Even Trumpโ€™s pick for Interior secretary, Doug Burgum, refused to disavow wind power during a hearing last week, saying he would pursue an โ€œall of the aboveโ€ energy strategy.

Many state and local policymakers, including the members of America Is All In, a climate coalition made up of government leaders and businesses from all 50 states, pledged to take up the mantle of climate action in the absence of federal leadership.

โ€œRegardless of the federal governmentโ€™s actions, mayors are not backing down on our commitment to the Paris Agreement,โ€ said Phoenix Mayor Kate Gallego, in a statement. โ€œOur constituents are looking to us to meet the moment and deliver meaningful solutions.โ€

El Paso County to consider forever chemicals testing agreement with Air Force — #Colorado Politics #PFAS

Fountain Creek photo via the Fountain Creek Watershed Flood Control and Greenway District

Click the link to read the article on the Colorado Politics website (Savannah Eller). Here’s an excerpt:

January 22, 2025

The El Paso County Board of County Commissioners will soon have an option on the table to formalize a forever chemicals testing agreement with the Air Force over wells at Fountain Creek Regional Park. Todd Marts, El Paso County director of community services, said in an informal meeting with commissioners on Tuesday that the U.S. Air Force has been regularly testing wells for two forever chemical types in “surrounding areas” including the park. The agreement would formalize continued access for the military…

Widefield aquifer via the Colorado Water Institute.

Residents in and around Fountain and Security-Widefield were previously exposed to elevated levels of forever chemicals from firefighting foams used on Peterson Space Force Base. The communities have since put in systems to treat groundwater…The county did not have immediate plans to mitigate forever chemicals in park water, with Melvin pointing out that the chemicals lived up to their name. El Paso County’s parks department is considering the addition of a third well to serve the Fountain Creek Nature Center, will would also be subject to testing under the access agreement with the Air Force. The contract will allow military access for testing for one year, with the option to renew for nine years. The El Paso County commissioners will vote on the agreement as an item at an upcoming public meeting.ย 

#ColoradoRiverโ€™s โ€œessentialโ€ conservation program, now lapsed, faces Trump spending freeze. Can lawmakers bring it back?: System Conservation Pilot Program pays people to use less water for farming — The #Denver Post #COriver #aridification

At the confluence of Canyon Creek and the Colorado River. Photo credit: Friends of Canyon Creek

Click the link to read the article on The Denver Post website (Elise Schmelzer). Here’s an excerpt:

The pilot program has paid water users โ€” mostly farmers and ranchers โ€” in the four states in the Colorado Riverโ€™s Upper Basin to voluntarily use less river water than their water rights allow. Farmers from Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah could choose not to irrigate some of their land orย to grow a crop that uses less water. Over the last two years, the Upper Colorado River Commission has spent $44.6 million to conserve 101,441 acre-feet of water, enough water to supply more than 200,000 households with a yearโ€™s worth of water. But federal lawmakers late last year failed to pass a bill that would reauthorizeย the System Conservation Pilot Program, or SCPP. That lapse has forced the programโ€™s managers toย cancel plans to begin accepting applications early this month for 2025 projectsย and has jeopardized the effortโ€™s near-term future. Congressional leaders from Colorado and other states in the drought-stricken river basin on Tuesdayย filed legislationย that would restart the System Conservation Pilot Program. The bill โ€” the Colorado River Basin System Conservation Extension Act โ€” is sponsored by lawmakers from both political parties who represent Colorado, Wyoming and Utah…

President Donald Trump, on the first day of his new administration,ย issued an executive orderย freezingย spending from the Inflation Reduction Act. That law was part of billions of dollars of investments by former President Joe Bidenโ€™s administration into clean energy and climate change-related projects, including $125 million for the SCPP. While more than $80 million remains allocated for the SCPP, the program cannot continue until Congress reauthorizes it and the administration allows Inflation Reduction Act spending again.

Replacing grass can help save water, but just how much? — Alex Hager (KUNC.org) #conservation #aridification

Chris Bowers (right) surveys a site where nonfunctional turf is being replaced on the University of Northern Colorado campus on January 15, 2025. The landscaping change will bring water use on that patch of campus down from about 3 million gallons each year to 1 million. Photo credit: Alex Hager/KUNC

Click the link to read the article on the KUNC website (Alex Hager):

January 23, 2025

This story is part of ongoing coverage of water in the West, produced by KUNC in Colorado and supported by the Walton Family Foundation. KUNC is solely responsible for its editorial coverage.

Way before spring, when the trees are leafless skeletons and the grass is dry and beige, the people in charge of helping plants blossom at the University of Northern Colorado were hard at work. Chris Bowers, the schoolโ€™s energy and sustainability manager walked through the churned-up dirt of a construction site near the campus commons building. Sparse and brown on a chilly January day, he laid out a vision for the spaceโ€™s future in warmer months.

โ€œThere will be people hanging out and studying and eating lunch and using a space that was not used at all before,โ€ Bowers said.

This site is an experiment in reshaping the unused grassy expanses that sprawl across campus. For decades, the area was a patch of green grass that fell into the category of โ€œnonfunctional turfโ€ โ€“ a term water experts use to describe grass that serves no purpose besides aesthetics.

Now, as part of a statewide effort to save water, Coloradoโ€™s government is trying to convince people and institutions to rip out their thirsty grass lawns and replace them with native plants and more functional space. It comes amid an urgent need to cut down on water use, but there are limits to the amount of water that can be saved.

With the help of a state grant and money from the nonprofit Western Resource Advocates, UNCโ€™s patch of grass โ€” which long served no purpose besides looking pretty โ€” will be replaced with a patio, spots for hammocks and native prairie grasses.

โ€œThis is the first step in what we hope is a push forward in this becoming more of a standard across campus,โ€ Bowers said.

While UNC is only replacing grass in a relatively small area for now, the water savings are fairly substantial. That area will see its water use go down from about three million gallons each year to about one million. UNC officials said the native plants in that area may actually demand more water than is currently used during their first three years of growth but will need less in the long term. Some years, they said, those plants might require no irrigation water and grow using only water that falls from the sky.

The project is part of a program from the Colorado Water Conservation Board, the stateโ€™s top water management agency. It gave grants to fifty different water-saving projects, the majority of which are on the Front Range.

A car drives by a turf replacement project at the University of Northern Colorado on January 15, 2025. Proponents of the work hope its location near a busy road, will help raise awareness about water-saving landscaping. Photo credit: Alex Hager/KUNC

As Colorado โ€“ and more broadly, the arid Southwest โ€“ struggles with drought and long-term drying due to climate change, policymakers are under pressure to cut back on water use. Coloradoโ€™s turf replacement program is borne out of that reality, but it may only be able to make a minuscule dent in the stateโ€™s overall water use.

The overwhelming majority of the stateโ€™s water โ€” between 80-90% โ€” is used for agriculture. Only 7% of the stateโ€™s water is used by cities and towns, and only 2.7% of the stateโ€™s water is used outdoors in cities and towns. So any efforts to cut down on lawn watering will only be working within that tiny slice of the stateโ€™s overall water portfolio.

A 2024 report from the CWCB estimated how much water could reasonably be saved through turf replacement programs. After taking out water used for trees and shrubs, and functional turf like sports fields or city parks โ€” which experts say are worth watering โ€” state officials think they can save .004% of the stateโ€™s total water use.

The CWCB requested $1.4 million in its 2025 budget to run a more complete analysis of land cover across Colorado and get a more accurate appraisal of how much nonfunctional turf there is across the state.

Jenna Battson, the agencyโ€™s outdoor water conservation coordinator, said programs to replace nonfunctional turf are still worthwhile, especially as a way to give people a visible reminder of ways to cut back on water use.

โ€œThey think, โ€˜Oh, I can do this and save water,โ€™ and then it might cascade and allow them to start thinking about other ways that they can reduce their water use,โ€ she said. โ€œWhich I think will have a broader impact than just the water savings on its face.โ€

Battson said a turf replacement project like UNCโ€™s, on a college campus near a busy road, might have an added impact because of what she called โ€œthe neighbor effect.โ€

โ€œIf you’re doing more really public spaces that are highly visible,โ€ Battson said.โ€ That impact can also spread because people are seeing it.โ€

Larger projects like the one on UNCโ€™s campus will certainly deliver water savings, but what actually happens to that saved water is another question entirely. In cities across the arid West, conserving municipal water rarely means more water is left in the rivers that supply them.

Around Colorado and the Southwest, some cities have instituted conservation measures to help facilitate further growth. In Colorado Springs, for example, a regime of grass replacement and lawn watering restrictions has allowed the city to grow by about 40% while bringing average per capita water use down by nearly 40%, and total water deliveries down by about 25%.

Those kinds of savings are especially important in Greeley, where population growth has exploded in recent years. Between 2022 and 2023, Greeley grew by 3.1%, far and away the largest rate of growth among Coloradoโ€™s 15 largest cities.

Lindsay Rogers, policy manager for municipal conservation at Western Resource Advocates, says those water savings are still valuable.

โ€œIt’s very possible that the savings from the UNC project are not going to end up back in the Poudre River,โ€ she said. โ€œBut there’s still a huge benefit to using those savings to support new growth, as opposed to relying on new supplies.โ€

Western Resource Advocates helped pay for the UNC project. The group also receives funding from the Walton Family Foundation, which supports KUNCโ€™s Colorado River coverage.

Clinton Meagher nails artificial turf into the ground at a Henderson, Nevada home on June 15, 2021. Aggressive water conservation measures have helped the Las Vegas area bring its water use down while adding population. Photo credit: Luke Runyon/KUNC

Turf replacement programs have been switched into hyperspeed in the cities that need it most. While the practice is still gaining traction in Colorado, fast-growing cities elsewhere in the Colorado River basin have leaned hard into it.

In Las Vegas, which has a relatively small allocation of water from the Colorado River, the city has grown by about 750,000 people since 2002 and managed to bring down its use of Colorado River water by 26%. Those kinds of savings are partially thanks to a turf removal program going back more than two decades, but also a uniquely aggressive enforcement strategy in which a team of investigators drives around issuing fines for water waste.

While similar efforts are unlikely in Colorado anytime soon, policymakers are pushing ahead to cut back on nonfunctional grass to save more water in cities.

The Colorado Water Conservation Board is still taking proposals for more water conservation projects like the one at UNC. It recently picked seven projects that are close to getting approved. Battson said thereโ€™s already high demand for the next round of funding, which is about $470,000.

Starting January 1, 2026, a new statewide law will go into effect prohibiting local governments from allowing new nonfunctional turf to be planted.

Mrs. Gulch’s landscape September 14, 2023.

San Luis Peoplesโ€™ Ditch: Historic acequia in desperate need of repair: #RioGrande Basin Roundtable approves funding requests for Phase I of the rehabilitation project — Evan Arvizu (AlamosaCitizen.com)

Erosion and years of freezing and thawing after more than six decades of use have left the San Luis Peoplesโ€™ Ditch with large cracks in multiple places along the channel. Credit: Mark Obmaskic

Click the link to read the article on the Alamosa Citizen website (Evan Arvizu):

January 24, 2025

The San Luis Peoplesโ€™ Ditch, an acequia that holds the first adjudicated water rights in the region, granted in 1852, is the oldest continuously used community irrigation ditch in Colorado. The ditch has significant ties to local cultural heritage and a storied past connected to traditional water management practices. Itโ€™s also in desperate need of repairs. 

Years of wear and tear on the channel have resulted in a cracked concrete infrastructure that reduces the efficiency of water transport and harms irrigators. The San Luis Peoplesโ€™ Ditch Rehabilitation Project is working to solve this problem. 

At last weekโ€™s Rio Grande Basin Roundtable meeting, funding for Phase I of the project was approved. Now, sponsors will work to get final approval from the Colorado Water Conservation Board and figure out contracts. If everything goes to plan, all three tasks in Phase I, expected to cost a combined $45,000, will begin in the fall of 2025. 

A marker commemorating The San Luis Peoplesโ€™ Ditch as the oldest continuously used community irrigation ditch in Colorado. Credit: Mark Obmaskic

Originally a shallow hand-dug acequia, the San Luis Peoplesโ€™ Ditch was lined with concrete in the early 1960s to maximize water delivery to the area. It was incorporated in 1967, and currently serves 16 parciantes, affiliated water-users, irrigating more than 2,000 acres of crops like hay and alfalfa. 

Having already lasted more than 60 years, this concrete addition has long outlived the usual expected lifespan of 25 years. Now, erosion from more than six decades of use has left it in urgent need of attention. Years of freezing and thawing has caused large cracks in multiple places along the channel, significantly reducing the amount of water delivered to irrigators. 

Acequias โ€“ gravity-fed, community-managed irrigation systems โ€“ distribute water and snowmelt through hand-dug channels to agricultural fields for both crops and livestock. The acequia system was brought to the southwest United States by farmers emigrating to the San Luis Valley from Mexico. Used in arid landscapes around the world, the practice originated in North Africa to distribute water from rivers to desert valleys. It was brought to Spain by the Moors, and brought to Mexico by the Spaniards during the colonial period. 

Traditionally, acequias function on the idea of communal maintenance and equal water sharing during times of abundance and shortage, overseen by a mayordomo or ditch manager. This structure instills important cultural values centered around collective responsibility and respect for community and the environment. 

The unique, longstanding cultural practices as well as the physical structures of the nearly 1,000 acequias that exist in Colorado and New Mexico today are facing a multitude of threats, including modernization, socio-economic, political, and environmental pressures.

While just one of many factors impacting acequias and agricultural communities in the San Luis Valley, drought and environmental changes that impact water availability are a serious concern. Demand for water already exceeds supply in the region, and drought conditions like increased temperatures continue to intensify such processes as evapotranspiration that decrease accessible irrigation water. The drought that the southwest has experienced in the last two decades is severe, with 2002 being the worst drought on record. Identified by climate scientists and the USDA Climate Hub as a potentially emerging megadrought, itโ€™s been the driest 22-year period in over a thousand years

Changing precipitation patterns, even with potential increases in the form of intense rainstorms, put acequia systems at risk due to a lack of major water storage capabilities. Adapting to these changes could mean shifting growing seasons and irrigation schedules. Ultimately, compounding impacts of climate change make maximizing available water even more crucial for irrigators and farmers in the Valley. 

โ€œEvery drop counts as we face these dry times,โ€ said Amber Pacheco, deputy general manager of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District, emphasizing the importance of improving aging infrastructure to lessen water loss. 

Credit: Mark Obmaskic

Phase I of the Rehabilitation Project will get these improvements started. With three main tasks, this phase is focused on surveying and assessing the current conditions of the ditch infrastructure in order to recommend repairs and improvements. 

The first task will encompass a GPS and aerial drone survey, and a component survey of the 3.5 mile ditch. The surveys will check structures, turnouts, piped road crossings, and more, taking note of sections that need to be repaired or upgraded. 

The second task will involve an engineer analyzing the structural integrity of the concrete infrastructure, identifying weak spots and areas most at risk of failure. An evaluation of the hydraulic efficiency will also take place, modeling how the water is moving through the channel to find obstructions or specific structures that are problematic. 

The third task is a comprehensive final report detailing all of the findings, recommending locations for repairs and improvements, and estimating costs for the next phase of the project. It will be used to determine an actionable plan and request funding for the actual concrete replacement. 

The existence of the Peoplesโ€™ Ditch acts as the physical legacy of those who built it hundreds of years ago. Many current users of the ditch are descendants of the original builders, marking generations of connection and rich heritage embedded in the land and acequia system. The San Luis Peoplesโ€™ Ditch Rehabilitation Project aims to enhance the performance and longevity of the ditch while preserving the existing infrastructure and its deep-rooted cultural significance.

Evan Arvizu

Evan Arvizu is an intern with the Rural Journalism Institute of the San Luis Valley. Sheโ€™s a senior at Colorado College majoring in Environmental Anthropology and minoring in Journalism. More by Evan Arvizu

San Luis People’s Ditch March 17, 2018. Photo credit: Greg Hobbs

How do President Trumpโ€™s Executive Orders Impact Your Clean Water? — Leda Hua (AmericanRivers.org)

Merrimack River, New Hampshire | Merrimack River Watershed Council

Click the link to read the article on the American Rivers website (Leda Hua):

January 22, 2025

Following his inauguration, President Trump issued a number of executive orders focused on climate and energyโ€”actions that could have major impacts on the rivers and clean water that all Americans depend on. President Trump has said he wants our country to have โ€œthe cleanest water,โ€ which is why we must prevent any actions that harm our rivers and drinking water sources.   

Thatโ€™s why we need a responsible national energy strategy that is considerate of our water resources. Responsible energy development means meeting the needs of people without damaging the environment that our health and water wealth depend on.  

No matter who you are or where you live, we all need clean, safe, reliable drinking water. Most of our countryโ€™s water comes from rivers. Public opinion research shows that Republican, Democrat, and Independent voters of all ages and races overwhelmingly support protections for clean water.  Clean water is a basic need, a human right, and a nonpartisan issue we can all agree on. 

The details and implementation of these executive orders will matter as we pursue the dual goals of energy and water security. 

We cannot return to days where polluters were allowed to devastate rural and urban communities and their natural resources. But these executive orders eliminate efforts to safeguard communities from environmental harm, putting their drinking water at risk.  

In addition to protecting Americans from pollution, we also need to help families and businesses prepare for increasingly extreme weather. As Asheville, North Carolina and other communities in the Southeast continue to recover from Hurricane Helene, and thousands in Los Angeles are without homes following recent catastrophic fires, we should be bolstering policies to fight climate change and working to strengthen communities in the face of severe floods, droughts, and fires.  

Created by Imgur user Fejetlenfej , a geographer and GIS analyst with a โ€˜lifelong passion for beautiful maps.โ€™ It highlights the massive expanse of river basins across the country โ€“ in particular, those which feed the Mississippi River, in pink.

Stable on the #ColoradoRiver: When โ€œgoodโ€ is not good enough — John Fleck and Jack Schmidt (InkStain.net) #COriver #aridification

Stable isnโ€™t good enough. Credit: Jack Schmidt/InkStain

Click the link to read the article on the InkStain.net website (John Fleck and Jack Schmidt):

January 14, 2025

Preliminary year-end Colorado River numbers are stark. Total basin-wide storage for the last two years has stabilized, oscillating between 30 and 27 maf (million acre-feet), where storage sits at the start of 2025[1]. That is lower than any sustained period since the Riverโ€™s reservoirs were built (Fig. 1). Stable is better than declining, but we did not succeed in rebuilding reservoir storage during 2024โ€™s excellent snowpack but modest inflow. Although reservoir storage significantly increased after the gangbuster 2023 snowmelt year, we have not protected the storage gained in 2024 when inflow to Lake Powell was ~85% of normal from a 130% of normal snowpack. We canโ€™t rely on frequent repeats of 2023; we must do better at increasing storage in modest inflow years like 2024.

Why is this happening?

Less water. Credit: InkStain

The phrase โ€œthe new normalโ€ can be misleading, suggesting a new, more stable state for the climate. Itโ€™s not gonna be stable. But by one reasonable measure โ€“ total estimated natural flow in the Colorado River at Lees Ferry โ€“ Calendar Year 2024 was typical of the first quarter of the 21st century, with a preliminary estimate of 12.1 million acre-feet โ€œnatural flow.โ€ Thus, the calendar year average annual natural flow at Lees Ferry between 2000 and 2024 has been 12.4 maf/yr, down from 14.3 maf for the period 1930-1999. An additional 770,000 af/yr in side inflows between Lees Ferry and Lake Mead add to the available water supply[2].

That we made the cuts needed to stabilize reservoir levels with a natural flow at Lees Ferry as low as 12.1maf would have been a substantial achievement in the wetter โ€œbefore times.โ€ Now, itโ€™s table stakes. The most important point is that we absolutely did not rebuild storage in 2024, despite a 130 percent snowpack. We must do better in reducing total basin consumptive use.

Once again in 2024, we saw substantial water use reductions among the states of the Lower Colorado River Basin. Total U.S. Lower Basin main stem use of 6.08 maf is the lowest since 1985 (meaning the lowest since the Central Arizona Project came on line). Californiaโ€™s use, based on preliminary numbers published by Reclamation seems to be the lowest since 1950, and use by the Imperial Irrigation District seems to be the absolute lowest in a dataset that goes back to 1941. These are important achievements, to be celebrated.

With regard to the other two major U.S. areas of use โ€“ Lower Basin tributaries and the Upper Basin as a whole โ€“ we have no idea what 2024 consumptive use was. This is a problem. Lower Basin main stem use is quantified through Reclamationโ€™s annual accounting reports and reported on a nearly daily basis during the course of the water year. River flows and reservoir levels across the basin are similarly reported in public, transparent ways. Thatโ€™s how weโ€™re able to provide the data you see above. Anyone can download and crunch the numbers. The general public canโ€™t readily do that for consumptive use in the Upper Basin or Lower Basin tributaries.

As Elinor Ostrom noted in her classic bookย Governing the Commons,ย shared understanding of the resource is crucial to successful water management. Increasingly, areas of uncertainty have become contested ground, as the genuine technical uncertainties collide with the motivated reasoning of political actors across the basin. [ed. emphasis mine]

With respect to the Upper Basin, we note that the rhetoric that Upper Basin water users suffer shortages in dry years has shifted to a broader claim that Upper Basin users always suffer shortages. We quote here from the Upper Basin statesโ€™ January 2 press release: โ€œThere are acute hydrologic shortages in the Upper Basin every year โ€“ there simply isnโ€™t enough water in any year to satisfy current needs in the Upper Basin every year. The Upper Basin has made uncompensated cuts to their water users every year for the past 24 years.โ€ Some of the data to support this assertion was presented at the December 2024 UCRC meeting, and we look forward to a more complete and transparent accounting of these data, because these data are crucial to a robust Colorado River management discussion. The Upper Basinโ€™s experience of โ€œacute hydrologic shortages โ€ฆ every yearโ€ is exactly what John Wesley Powell described in 1878 in the first edition of The Arid Lands Report.  Nothing has changed, and the challenge of agriculture throughout the watershed has been well known for 150 years. We also note that consumptive use data throughout the basin has not been integrated with the important findings of Richter et al (2024) who documented the proportion of water used by different agricultural sectors. They estimated that 55% of all Colorado River water use supplies livestock feed.

We leave a discussion of Lower Basin tributary use for another post but note that in both the cases of the Upper Basin use and Lower Basin tributary use, the numbers are entangled in the current Upper Basin-Lower Basin feud, which makes serious efforts to think about how to manage water at the Basin scale, rather than simply defending parochial interests, much more difficult. It is important that the general public not employed by a state or water agency, and therefore not beholden to local parochial interests, help the basin community as a whole navigate these technical issues.

Conclusion

The stable reservoir levels at the end of 2024, despite another year of deep Lower Basin water use reductions, should be cause for alarm. Deeper cuts are needed. But without a shared understanding of water use elsewhere in the basin, weโ€™re flying blind.

[1] Basin-wide reservoir storage reached a peak of 29.7 maf on 13 July 2023 and was subsequently drawn down to 27.5 maf by mid-April 2024. Inflow from 2024 snowmelt rebounded basin-wide storage to 30.0 maf on 6 July 2024, and storage was subsequently drawn down to 27.4 maf by 31 December 2024. Retention of storage in Lake Mead and Lake Powell has been somewhat better during the same period. Combined storage in Lake Mead and Lake Powell peaked in mid-July 2023 at 18.0 maf, declined to 17.1 maf by mid-May 2024, increased to 18.5 maf on 8 July 2024, and was 17.3 maf on 31 December 2024. Thus, storage in the two largest reservoirs at yearโ€™s end was slightly greater than it was at its spring 2024 minimum just before storage increased when significant snowmelt reached Lake Powell.

[2]ย This estimate is calculated as the difference between annual flow measured just upstream from Diamond Creek in western Grand Canyon and measured at Lees Ferry.

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2024. Credit: Brad Udall

A Guide to Fighting for Wild Rivers | Presented by OARS

Yampa River near Deer Lodge Park. Photo credit: Allen Best/Big Pivots

Premiered Jan 22, 2025

Discover the magic of the Yampa, the last wild river in the Colorado River Basin, and learn how to build a movement to protect a wild river near you. Step 1: Be proactiveโ€ฆ Since 2012, OARS has joined forces with American Rivers and Friends of the Yampa, to host an annual Yampa River Awareness Project (YRAP) river trip. This initiative invites key decision-makers, stakeholders, and activists on a transformative rafting journey along the free-flowing Yampa River, offering them the chance to experience firsthand what could be lost if the river is threatened by a major dam, diversion, or dewatering project. Filmed during the 2024 YRAP trip, A Guide to Fighting for Wild Rivers illustrates how immersing people in a riverโ€™s beauty and sharing its ecological significance fosters deep, personal connections that inspire long-term conservation. Each trip builds a growing network of passionate river defenders, united by a shared commitment to preserving the Yampa for future generations. Explore Yampa River rafting trips: https://bit.ly/49DoNCA The step-by-step conservation model shared in the film takes a cue from early river crusaders like David Brower, Bus Hatch, and Martin Litton, whose advocacy efforts helped achieve several major conservation wins for western rivers, galvanized by peopleโ€™s love of a place.

๐ŸŽฅ Film by Logan Bockrath

Announcement: Public water systems grant availability for emerging contaminants: Grant application deadline is March 21 — #Colorado Department of Public Heakth & Environment

Firefighting foam containing PFAS chemicals is responsible for contamination in Fountain Valley. Photo via USAF Air Combat Command

From email from CDPHE:

January 24, 2025

The Water Quality Control Division (division) is pleased to announce the Request for Applications (RFA) for the Emerging Contaminants in Small or Disadvantaged Communities Grant Program. This RFA is open as of January 24, 2025. 

This program helps non-transient, non-community or community public water systems in small or disadvantaged communities. The funds can help with planning, design, and infrastructure to reduce public health risks from emerging contaminants, including PFAS (per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances), manganese, and others. 

The details of this RFA are located on the divisionโ€™s website. Written questions and inquiries regarding the RFA are due on February 7, 2025, by 2:00 p.m. MDT.

The application deadline is March 21, 2025, at 11:59 p.m. MDT.
Lenguaje y accesibilidad
Si necesita ayuda en espaรฑol o en otro idioma, pรณngase en contacto con la divisiรณn escribiendo a cdphe.commentswqcd@state.co.us.

17 #Colorado water, #drought projects in limbo after Trump halts spending from Biden-era law — Shannon Mullane (Fresh Water News)

Dillon Reservoir is Denver Waterโ€™s largest reservoir. It sends water to the Front Range via the 23-mile-long Roberts Tunnel under the Continental Divide. Photo credit: Denver Water.

Click the link to read the article on the Water Education Colorado website (Shannon Mullane):

January 23, 2024

On Friday, in the last hours of the Biden administration, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation announced it would spend $388.3 million for environmental projects in Colorado and three other Colorado River Basin states.

Now that funding is in limbo.

The money was set to come from a Biden-era law, the Inflation Reduction Act. On Monday, President Donald Trump ordered federal agencies to halt spending money under the act. Lawmakers were still trying to understand whether the freeze applied to the entire Inflation Reduction Act or portions of it as of Wednesday afternoon.

Shoshone Falls hydroelectric generation station via USGenWeb

The new executive order focused on energy spending but also raised questions about funding for environmental projects in the Colorado River Basin, including $40 million for western Coloradoโ€™s effort to buy powerful water rights tied to Shoshone Power Plant on the Colorado River and 16 other projects in Colorado.

Past regulations have been burdensome and impeded the development of the countryโ€™s energy resources, according to the executive order.

โ€œIt is thus in the national interest to unleash Americaโ€™s affordable and reliable energy and natural resources,โ€ the order said. โ€œThis will restore American prosperity โ€” including for those men and women who have been forgotten by our economy in recent years.โ€

The president issued dozens of executive actions within hours of his inauguration, including rescinding 78 of former President Joe Bidenโ€™s executive actions.

Where spending is stalled, federal agencies will have 90 days to review their funding processes to make sure they align with the Trump administrationโ€™s policies.

For now, the future is unsure for 42 environmental projects in four states โ€” Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.

Environmental efforts for the Colorado River

The proposed projects focus on improving habitats, ecological stability and resilience against drought in the Colorado River Basin, where prolonged drought and overuse have cast uncertainty over the future water supply for 40 million people. Reclamation also awarded $100 million for Colorado River environmental projects in Arizona, California and Nevada.

Coloradans were promised up to about $135 million from the Inflation Reduction Act as part of the Upper Basin Environmental Drought Mitigation Program. Itโ€™s one of many buckets that have distributed money from the act to Colorado.

This map shows the 15-mile reach of the Colorado River near Grand Junction, home to four species of endangered fish. Map credit: CWCB

With the funding, people around the state hope to upgrade infrastructure to help protect 15 miles of key habitat near Grand Junction for endangered species on the Colorado River. They want to improve aquatic habitats along rivers in Grand County, where low flows threaten fish and aquatic life, and restore ancient, water- and carbon-storing fens.

โ€œIt wasnโ€™t surprising, but we still need to wait to see how it gets interpreted, and what itโ€™s going to apply to or not apply to,โ€ said Steve Wolff, general manager of the Southwestern Water Conservation District. The district joined with local partners to apply for funding for 17 projects in southwestern Colorado and was awarded $25.6 million.

โ€œWe would all be very disappointed if any of this money was removed,โ€ Wolff said. โ€œThese funds are really bipartisan and are meant to get put on the ground and do good work.โ€

The town of Silverton, Colorado, USA as seen from U.S. Route 550. By Daniel Schwen – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10935432

One of those projects aims to restore ancient fens along Highway 550, known as the Million Dollar Highway, between Silverton and Ouray in southwestern Colorado.

These fens, between 6,000 and 14,000 years old, naturally store carbon and slow runoff from the mountains, helping to maintain flows into the summer when water runs low and demand outpaces supply. Drought, a history of mining, and human impacts in the area have degraded the fen ecosystems over time, said Jake Kurzweil, a hydrologist with Mountain Studies Institute in southwestern Colorado.

The project managers want to hire locally to help the rural economy. And the work would help restore river ecosystems where they begin โ€” at their headwaters โ€” if the funding actually comes through.

โ€œUntil thereโ€™s a contract in place, we wonโ€™t be including it in our budgets,โ€ Kurzweil said. โ€œWeโ€™re optimistically hopeful, but not counting our chickens before they hatch.โ€

Of the 42 Upper Colorado River projects awarded funds from the Inflation Reduction Act, 17 projects would include work in Colorado:

San Juan River Basin. Graphic credit Wikipedia.
  • Southern Ute Indian Tribeโ€™s Pine River Environment Drought Mitigation Project: Up to $16.7 million:ย The funding would improve the health of the Pine River watershed, fish passage,ย deteriorating infrastructure,ย and water quality while addressing drought impacts.
Shoshone Hydroelectric Plant back in the days before I-70 via Aspen Journalism
  • Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project: Up to $40 million:ย The funding would go toward the $99 million purchase of theย Shoshone Power Plantโ€™s water rightsย by the Colorado River Water Conservation District. The district says it will protect future water supplies for ecosystems, farms, ranches, communities and recreational businesses.
The Dolores River shows us whatโ€™s at stake in the fight to protect the American West — Conservation Colorado
  • Addressing Drought Mitigation in Southwestern Colorado: Up to $25.6 million:ย The funding would support 17 projects in the Dolores and San Juan river basins in southwestern Colorado. The projects aim to restore ecosystems and enhance biodiversity and water resources while supporting local communities and endangered species.
Tomichi Creek, a tributary of the Gunnison River, runs through the Peterson Ranch property. The Colorado Water Conservation Board holds an instream flow water right for 18 cfs on the creek in this stretch. CREDIT: HEATHER SACKETT/ASPEN JOURNALISM
  • Grand Mesa and Upper Gunnison Watershed Resiliency and Aquatic Connectivity Project: Up to $24.3 million:ย The funding would restore watersheds to combat drought impacts to water quality and habitat in western Colorado.
Orchard Mesa circa 1911
  • Orchard Mesa Irrigation District Conveyance Upgrades for 15-Mile Reach Flow Enhancement: Up to $10.5 million:ย The funding would convert open canals into pressurized pipelines, improving water delivery efficiency and reducing environmental stressors. This upgrade aims to support endangered fish species by enhancing streamflow in a critical stretch of the Colorado River.
A man fishes along Blue River. The federal government Dec. 19, 2023, announced a $1.8 million grant for a habitat restoration on a section of the Blue River. Blue River Watershed Group/Courtesy photo
  • Enhancing Aquatic Habitat in Colorado River Headwaters: Up to $7 million:ย The funding would restore streamย habitats along the Fraser,ย Blue and Colorado rivers in Grand County through channel shaping and bank stabilization.
Coyote Gulch on the Yampa River Core Trail August 24, 2022.
  • Yampa River/Walton Creek Confluence Restoration Project: Up to $5 million:ย The funding would restore river and floodplain habitat around Steamboat Springs.
Yellow-billed cuckoos have nearly been extirpated from the western U.S. Photo courtesy Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory.
  • Drought Resiliency on Western Colorado Conserved Lands: Up to $4.6 million:ย The funding would help improve wetlands, floodplains, erosion control structures and habitat for at-risk species like the yellow-billed cuckoo and Gunnison sage-grouse.
The Colorado River, which feeds into Lake Powell, begins its 1,450-mile journey in Rocky Mountain National Park near Grand Lake, Colorado. Denver Water gets half of its water from tributaries that feed into the Colorado River. Some of these tributaries include the Fraser River in Grand County and the Blue River in Summit County. Photo credit: Denver Water
  • Upper Colorado Basin Aquatic Organism Passage Program: Up to $4.2 million:ย The funding would restore stream habitat in Grand County to improve biodiversity, habitats, fish passage and drought resilience.
Palisade peach orchard
  • Conversion of Wastewater Lagoons into Wetlands: Up to $3 million:ย The funding would turn outdated sewer lagoons intoย wetlands to improve biodiversityย and habitat for migratory waterfowl and endangered fish species in Palisade.
Fruita Reservoir #2 Dam Removal & Comprehensive Environmental Restoration. Photo credit: SGM
  • Fruita Reservoir Dam Removal: Up to $2.8 million:ย The funding would remove a dam on Piรฑon Mesa to restore wetlands, habitat and biodiversity.
Beaver dam analog. Photo: Juliet Grable
  • Monitoring and Quantifying the Effectiveness of Beaver Dam Analogs on Drought Influenced Streams in the Upper Colorado River Basin: Up to $1.9 million:ย The funding would restore degraded headwater meadows by implementing structures that mimic theย natural functions of beaver dams.
Uncompahgre River Valley looking south
  • Uncompahgre Tailwater Rehabilitation Project: Up to $1.8 million:ย The funding would stabilize stream banks, restore aging infrastructure and improve the river habitat to help with ecological health and recreational opportunities.
Photo credit: Town of Gypsum
  • Eagle River Habitat Improvement, Gypsum Ponds State Wildlife Area: Up to $1.5 million:ย The funding would improve fish habitat and water quality along the Eagle River in Eagle County.
Bicycling the Colorado National Monument, Grand Valley in the distance via Colorado.com
  • Orchard Mesa and Grand Valley Metering Efficiency Project: Up to $1.5 million:ย The funding would improve water management in the Grand Valley through the installation of advanced metering technology and real-time remote monitoring systems.
Biologists say federal target numbers are too low to ensure recovery of the Gunnison sage-grouse, which is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The bird’s largest population is in the Gunnison basin. Photo credit: Colorado Parks and Wildlife.
  • Habitat Restoration in the Gunnison Basin: Up to $750,000:ย ย The funding would use low-tech restoration structures to restore habitat for the endangeredย Gunnison sage-grouseย in the Gunnison River Basin.
Toxic-algae blooms appeared in Steamboat Lake summer of 2020. The lake shut down for two weeks after harmful levels of a toxin produced by the blue-green algae were found in the water. As climate change continues, toxic blooms and summer shutdowns of lakes are predicted to become more common. Photo credit: Julie Arington/Aspen Journalism
  • Cyanobacteria Monitoring and Treatment for Drought-driven Blooms in a High Elevation, Upper Colorado Reservoir to save Ecosystem Function: Up to $518,000:ย The funding would use real-time water quality monitoring tools and targeted treatments toย combat algal bloomsย and restore aquatic health at Williams Fork Reservoir.

More by Shannon Mullane

The Bureau of Reclamation has scheduled an increase in the release from Navajo Dam from 350 cubic feet per second (cfs) to 400 cfs for Friday, January 24th, at 4:00 AM.ย #SanJuanRiver #ColoradoRiver

Since the late 1980’s, this waterfall formed from interactions among Lake Powell reservoir levels and sedimentation that redirected the San Juan River over a 20-foot high sandstone ledge [Dominy Formation]. Until recently, little was known about its effect on two endangered fishes. Between 2015-2017, more than 1,000 razorback sucker and dozens of Colorado pikeminnow were detected downstream of the waterfall. Credit: Bureau of Reclamation

From email from Reclamation (Western Colorado Area Office):

Releases are made for the authorized purposes of the Navajo Unit, and to attempt to maintain a target base flow through the endangered fish critical habitat reach of the San Juan River (Farmington to Lake Powell).  The San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program recommends a target base flow of between 500 cfs and 1,000 cfs through the critical habitat area.  The target base flow is calculated as the weekly average of gaged flows throughout the critical habitat area from Farmington to Lake Powell. 

Harriet Crittenden LaMair to Step Down as CEO of High Line Canal Conservancy After More Than a Decade of Transformational Leadership

High Line Canal Conservancy Board Chair, Paula Herzmark, and CEO, Harriet Crittenden LaMair. Photo by Evan Semรณn Photography 720-620-6767

Click the link to read the release on the High Line Canal Conservancy website (Suzanna Fry Jones):

DENVER, CO โ€“ January 23, 2025 โ€“ The High Line Canal Conservancy announced today that Harriet Crittenden LaMair, the organizationโ€™s founding CEO, will step down after 11 years of visionary leadership. Harriet will remain in her role until mid-2025 to ensure a seamless transition as the Conservancy begins its next chapter.

โ€œThe preservation and protection of the High Line Canal have been my passion for the past 11 years,โ€ said LaMair. โ€œIt has been an honor and joy to work with so many friends and partners to secure a vital future for the old Canal. Given the Canal safeguards that we have put in place, I am confident this is the right time to step away from leading the Conservancy. Together with Denver Water, local governments and private support, we have permanently protected the Canal under a conservation easement, improved community access and safety and established a strong stewardship endowment, forever ensuring improved care along all 71 miles,โ€ said LaMair.

LaMairโ€™s impact is significant, having spearheaded the creation of the High Line Canal Conservancy in 2014, transforming it from a startup nonprofit into a trusted regional leader. Under LaMairโ€™s leadership, the Conservancy has achieved historic milestones: securing over $33 million in private investment matched by public funds for more than $100 million in Canal improvements, establishing a Canal Collaborative that unites 14 jurisdictions, launching impactful community programs and protecting the Canal with a conservation easement.

High Line hero in action! Harriet Crittenden LaMair rallies the team and community to protect and celebrate the 71-mile treasure during an event along the trail in Aurora. Photo by Evan Semรณn Photography

โ€œHarriet has been a trusted leader and champion for the Canal over the years and has set us up for success,โ€ said Arapahoe County Commissioner Carrie Warren-Gully. โ€œWe would not be where we are today without her tenacity, vision and commitment to the long-term protection and stewardship of the Canal. She is leaving a lasting legacy and big shoes to fill โ€” and a collective awareness that we all have a responsibility to care for this regional treasure now and forever.โ€

LaMairโ€™s contributions have garnered regional and national acclaim, including the 2017 Jane Silverman Ries Award and the 2022 Denver Regional Council of Governments Metro Vision Award.

โ€œHarrietโ€™s leadership has been nothing short of transformative, shaping the High Line Canal Conservancy into a trusted and respected regional leader,โ€ said Alan Salazar, CEO of Denver Water. โ€œHer unwavering passion for the natural world and her exceptional ability to bring people together have united communities and organizations around a shared vision for the Canalโ€™s future. Denver Water is proud to have partnered with Harriet and the Conservancy in this remarkable journey, and her legacy will undoubtedly inspire continued stewardship and collaboration for generations to come.โ€

Paula Herzmark, Chair of the High Line Canal Conservancy Board, credited LaMair with being the driving force behind the Conservancyโ€™s success: โ€œThrough her vision and determination, she not only built an organization but also inspired a regional movement that will benefit communities for generations. We owe her an incredible debt of gratitude for her leadership and passion for this remarkable resource.โ€

As the Conservancy moves forward, it remains steadfast in its mission to preserve and enhance the 71-mile High Line Canal. Over the next three years, the organization will implement more than 30 improvement projects, expand community programs and advance natural resource management initiatives. Herzmark reiterated the Boardโ€™s commitment to building on LaMairโ€™s legacy, stating, โ€œAs Harriet transitions from her role, we remain committed to carrying forward the legacy she created.โ€

The Conservancyโ€™s Board is actively preparing for this leadership transition and is committed to identifying a new CEO who will continue advancing the Conservancyโ€™s mission and vision. More information about the job posting will be shared in the coming weeks. In the meantime, interested parties can contact employment@highlinecanal.org for inquiries.

About the High Line Canal Conservancy
The High Line Canal Conservancy is a nonprofit dedicated to preserving, protecting and enhancing the 71-mile High Line Canal. Since its founding in 2014, the Conservancy has led a regional effort to ensure the Canal remains a vibrant and enduring resource. Learn more atย HighLineCanal.org.

The High Line Canal Collaborative celebrates a historic moment, marking the land transfer of a portion of the Canal from Denver Water to Arapahoe County. Left to Right: Harriet Crittenden LaMair (High Line Canal Conservancy), Paula Herzmark (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Dessa Bokides (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Amy Heidema (Denver Water), Mark Bernstein (Denver Parks and Recreation), Diana Romero Campbell (Denver City Council), Tom Roode (Denver Water), Alan Salazar (Denver Water), Jim Lochhead (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Steve Coffin (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Laura Kroeger (Mile High Flood District), Lora Thomas (Douglas County Commission), Evan Ela (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Melissa Reese-Thacker (South Suburban Parks and Recreation), Dan Olsen (Southeast Metro Stormwater Authority), Pam Eller (South Suburban Parks and Recreation Board of Directors), Earl Hoellen (Cherry Hills Village City Council), Jeff Baker (Arapahoe County Commission), Leslie Summey (Arapahoe County Commission), Shannon Carter (Retired – Arapahoe County Open Spaces), Bill Holen (Arapahoe County Commission), Carrie Warren-Gully (Arapahoe County Commission), Gretchen Rydin (Littleton City Council), Gini Pingenot (Arapahoe County Open Spaces), Amy Wiedeman (City of Centennial), Suzanne Moore (City of Greenwood Village), Brian Green (Aurora Parks, Recreation and Open Space), Nicole Ankeney (Aurora Parks, Recreation and Open Space). Photo by Evan Semรณn Photography

#Drought news January 23, 2025: The recent snows in the Rocky Mountains allowed for some drought intensity reductions in northern #Colorado and with western and north central #Wyoming. Colorado had moderate drought expand in the south.

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

Almost all the U.S. experienced a cooler-than-normal week, with only a handful of areas being above normal. The coolest readings were in the Rocky Mountains, where departures were up to 15 degrees below normal, while the warmest areas were in central and northern California, New England, and south Florida, where departures were a few degrees above normal. Precipitation was also greatest in the Rocky Mountains where the upper elevations recorded a good week of snow. Precipitation was widely scattered throughout the Southeast where some portions of north Florida had over 200% of normal precipitation for the week. At the end of the period, a cold air mass settled in over the eastern two-thirds of the country, bringing cold air all the way down into the deep South with winter storms along the Gulf Coast. There are multiple regions that have had several weeks of dryness with minimal precipitation. Even though it is winter, and drought tends to move slower due to reduction of demand, these areas will continue to be monitored for degradation if the pattern continues and the data support it…

High Plains

Some of the coldest air of the year settled into the region over the last week. Departures from normal temperatures were 12-15 degrees below normal in portions of Wyoming, South Dakota, and Colorado, and into Kansas and Nebraska. Dry conditions dominated the region with only portions of southwest Kansas and the Plains of Wyoming and Colorado recording precipitation. December and January are the driest months of the year and deficits are accumulating with little to no precipitation over the last several weeks. Conditions will continue to be monitored for further degradation in the region…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 21, 2025.

West

It was a dry week for most of the region outside of the accumulated snow in the Rocky Mountains and into northern New Mexico. Temperatures were mainly cooler than normal over the region, with portions of the Rocky Mountains 12-15 degrees below normal for the week. Portions of northern and central California were near normal to slightly above normal for temperatures this week. The abysmal start to the water year continues over much of southern California, southern Nevada and Utah, and into Arizona and New Mexico. Most of the managed water systems are fine in the region after two consecutive wet winters, but the short-term drought indicators for the current water year are highlighting the significant short-term drought in the Southwest into southern California. Degradation to drought status continued this week with drought expanding and intensifying over much of southern California. Abnormally dry conditions expanded over much of western New Mexico and northeastern Arizona, with extreme drought expanding over western Arizona and severe drought expanding over southwest Utah. The recent wet pattern was enough to remove the remaining abnormally dry conditions out of central Oregon while the recent snows in the Rocky Mountains allowed for some drought intensity reductions in northern Colorado and with western and north central Wyoming. Colorado had moderate drought expand in the south, with a new pocket of abnormally dry conditions added in the Southwest…

South

Temperatures were cooler than normal for the region this week with most areas 5-10 degrees below normal. It was mostly a dry week throughout the region with only areas of southern Texas recording above-normal precipitation. Some areas are pushing 60 or more days without any significant precipitation in portions of Oklahoma and Texas, but as it is climatologically the driest time of the year for some of these areas, drought degradation has been slow. Changes this week included an expansion of abnormally dry conditions over extreme northwest Arkansas and central Texas. Moderate drought also expanded over portions of central Texas due to reports of crop losses due to lack of soil moisture in the region. Extreme drought expanded along the Big Bend of Texas where hydrological indicators are supporting the expansion. Some improvements to the severe and extreme drought were made in middle Tennessee, but abnormally dry conditions were expanded in the southwest portion of the state…

Looking Ahead

Over the next five to seven days, it is anticipated that the greatest precipitation will be over the South into the Southeast from east Texas into western Alabama. Much of the country will see little to no precipitation with the most active precipitation areas from California into Wyoming and Montana, but amounts will generally be less than 1 inch for most locations. Temperatures are anticipated to be warmest over the central Plains to the upper Midwest with departures of 5-10 degrees above normal. The coolest temperatures will be in the west with most areas 5-10 degrees below normal.

The 6-10 day outlooks show that the probability of below-normal temperatures is greatest over the Southwest and in New England, while the greatest chances of above normal temperatures are over the High Plains and upper Midwest. Above-normal chances of above-normal precipitation are greatest over the southern United States from New Mexico into the Mid-Atlantic. The best chances of below normal precipitation are over the West and High Plains into the Midwest.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 21, 2025.

Release from the Friends of Canyon Creek (FriendsOfCanyonCreek.com): Oppose Nutrient Farms’ planned unit development at Garfield County Planning Commission on January 29th at 6 pm

At the confluence of Canyon Creek and the Colorado River. Photo credit: Friends of Canyon Creek

From email from the Friends of Canyon Creek (Chuck Montera):

January 22, 2025

Members of the coalition Friends of Canyon Creek are in opposition to a planned unit development (PUD) that is set for a hearing before Garfield County Planning Commission on Wednesday, January 29 at 6 pm. Approval of the Nutrient Farms PUD would have a devastating effect to Canyon Creek and the surrounding community. Friends of Canyon Creek, comprised of citizens, water rights holders, landowners and environmental interests, oppose this PUD because of its source of water โ€“ a new draw out of Canyon Creek.ย 

The Nutrient Farms PUD would divert nearly 9 cubic feet per second (cfs) of water (approximately 5 million gallons per day) from Canyon Creek, year-round, about 1.5 miles north of its confluence with the Colorado River. This water would be piped through the old Vulcan Ditch, through AVLT conservation easements, across dangerous and unstable hillside that burned and slid during the 2007 fire, under 6&24, and under I-70 and the railroad before even crossing the Colorado River to the south side. This is why the old Vulcan Ditch hasnโ€™t carried water nor been maintained to cross the Colorado in decades; it’s unstable, dangerous and inefficient.

Friends of Canyon Creek formed to protect this watershed and ensure it flows for future generations. 

We are opposed to the PUD as written for the following reasons:

  1. Drying up the creek would have significant environmental consequences, including harming local trout populations and destroying riparian ecosystems.
  2. FOCCโ€™s legal counsel believes Nutrient Farms has no legal right to divert Canyon Creek. This issue is currently before the Colorado Water Court.
  3. Last and perhaps most important, drying up Canyon Creek would hinder firefighting efforts and heighten risks for local property owners.

Nutrient Farms has the legal right to divert its water directly from the Colorado River, completely avoiding harm to Canyon Creek. They claim Colorado River is not high enough in quality to water crops. This is counter to the fact the Colorado River provides water to 40+ million people and irrigates 5.5 million acres of crops.

Our group does not oppose a new local farm, we oppose killing a creek to irrigate that farm.

We encourage concerned citizens to contact the Garfield County Planning Commission and BOCC and voice your opinions about this PUD. There will be a public comment period during the meeting if you want to speak out. For more information go to https://friendsofcanyoncreek.com.

The American Oil Industryโ€™s Playbook, Illustrated: How Drillers Offload Costly Cleanup Onto the Public — Mark Olalde, illustrations by Peter Arkle (ProPublica.org) #ActOnClimate

Abandoned gas well located in Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge. By Hillebrand, Steve, USFWS – https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/13540/rec/9, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=113189594

Click the link to read the article on the ProPublica website:

by Mark Olalde, illustrations by Peter Arkle, special to ProPublica

December 30, 2024

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Series: Unplugged:Will Taxpayers Foot the Oil Industryโ€™s Cleanup Bill?

More in this series

In December 1990, officials in the federal agency tasked with regulating offshore oil and gas drilling received a memo with a dire warning: America faced a ticking time bomb of environmental liability from unplugged oil and gas wells, wrote the agencyโ€™s chief of staff. Those wells and their costly cleanup obligations were being concentrated in the hands of cash-strapped drillers at the same time as production was shrinking. (The document, unearthed by public interest watchdog organization Documented, was shared with ProPublica and Capital & Main.)

More than three decades later, little action has been taken to heed that warning, and the time bomb is threatening to explode.

More than 2 million oil and gas wells sit unplugged across the country. Many leak contaminants like brine, methane and benzene into waterways, farmland and neighborhoods. The industry has already left hundreds of thousands of old wells as orphans, meaning companies walked away, leaving taxpayers, government agencies or other drillers on the hook for cleanup.

Americaโ€™s oil fields are increasingly split between a small number of wells producing record profits and everything else. Researchers estimate roughly 90% of wells are already dead or barely producing.

Consider the Permian Basin, the worldโ€™s most productive oil field, stretching from West Texas across southeastern New Mexico.

โ€œThe Permian is the oil patchโ€™s Alamo โ€” thatโ€™s where itโ€™s retreating to,โ€ Regan Boychuk, a Canadian oil cleanup researcher, said of the oil industry. โ€œThatโ€™s their last stand.โ€

Even here, many wells sit idle and in disrepair. Itโ€™s time to plug them, according to a growing chorus of researchers, environmentalists and industry representatives.

The question of who pays for cleanup remains unanswered. Time and again, oil companies have offloaded their oldest wells. Their tactics are not written down in one place or peddled by a single law firm โ€” but companies follow an unmistakable pattern. The strategy, which is legal if followed properly, has become such a tried-and-true endeavor that researchers and environmentalists dubbed it โ€œthe playbook.โ€

Clark Williams-Derry, an analyst with clean-energy-focused think tank the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, studies fossil fuel companiesโ€™ cleanup costs. โ€œThereโ€™s almost a cheerleading squad for shedding your liabilities, like a snake sheds its skin and just slithers away,โ€ he said.

Should you want to become an oil executive and try this strategy yourself, hereโ€™s how it works โ€ฆ

As you launch your business, begin by collecting subsidies, tax breaks and other incentives from the government to guarantee you can pump oil and gas profitably. Globally, fossil fuel subsidies total in the trillions each year, according to organizations such as the International Monetary Fund.

Next, start pumping and profiting.

As you set up your business, create layers of shell companies. Down the road, theyโ€™ll provide a firewall between you and your liabilities โ€” key among them, cleanup costs.

Once oil and gas production slows, sell low-producing wells. Smaller drillers operating on thinner margins, known in the business as โ€œscavenger companies,โ€ will be happy to take them off your hands.

Rinse and repeat by selling wells as their profits slow to a trickle. Theyโ€™ll be sold again to ever-smaller companies that teeter on the edge of insolvency. Maintenance and environmental stewardship will usually fall by the wayside as companies eke out a profit. Studies show that the number of environmental violations rises as wells pass to less-capitalized drillers. But these wells arenโ€™t your problem any longer.

Pull any remaining profits before regulators hit you with violations and fines for your remaining wells that arenโ€™t pumping and may be leaking.

Then, idle the wells โ€” pausing production, but not plugging them or cleaning up โ€” and walk away. Regulators are typically tasked with ensuring that as much oil as possible is pumped out of the ground, so rules allow wells to sit idle, instead of being plugged, in case prices surge and it becomes profitable to restart them. However, a study in California found that, after wells are inactive for only 10 months, thereโ€™s a 50-50 chance they will never produce again.

Regulators will likely grow tired of asking you to clean up your wells, but you can make the case for leaving them unplugged for now. Pitch grand plans, as other drillers have โ€” maybe repurposing the wells for bitcoin mining, carbon sequestration or the synthesis of hydrogen fuel โ€” that require the wells to remain open.

When regulatorsโ€™ patience has reached its limit, remind them what will happen if they come down hard on you. Fines or other extra costs could force your business into bankruptcy, leaving your unplugged wells as orphans and taxpayers on the hook. Ask them if they want to be responsible for that catastrophe.

โ€œThe root of the problem is thereโ€™s no regulator of the oil industry across North America,โ€ Boychuk said, adding that โ€œthe rule of law has never applied to oil and gas.โ€

When regulators finally act, declare bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code is meant to protect businesspeople like you who took risks. More than 250 oil and gas operators in the U.S. filed for bankruptcy protection between 2015 and 2021, according to law firm Haynes Boone. (Industry groups estimate there are several thousand oil companies in the country.)

Regulators only require oil and gas companies to set aside tiny bonds that act like a security deposit on an apartment. Because you didnโ€™t clean up your wells, youโ€™ll lose that money, but itโ€™s a fraction of the profits youโ€™ve banked or the cost of the cleanup work. ProPublica and Capital & Main found that bonds typically equal less than 2% of actual cleanup costs.

And as you finalize your exit, the labyrinth of shell corporations you set up should act as corporate law intends, protecting you from future responsibility. Such companies, little more than stacks of paper, will be responsible for your liabilities, not you. Even if regulators know who is behind a company, it becomes increasingly difficult to penetrate each layer of a business to go after individual executives.

โ€œItโ€™s the essence of corporate law,โ€ Williams-Derry said.

Now that youโ€™ve offloaded your wells, youโ€™re free to start fresh โ€” launch a new oil company and buy some of your old wells for pennies on the dollar, a proven option. Maybe you leave oil entirely โ€” thatโ€™s also tried-and-true. Or become a vintner and open a winery just down the road from the wells you left as orphans โ€” you wouldnโ€™t be the first.

For its part, the oil industry downplays the so-called playbook and the countryโ€™s orphan well epidemic. โ€œThereโ€™s a general trend, which is there are very few orphan wells,โ€ said Kathleen Sgamma, who has been among oil companiesโ€™ most vocal proponents as president of the Western Energy Alliance, an industry trade group. Plus, she said, companiesโ€™ bonds and statesโ€™ orphan well funds help pay for plugging.

But those tasked with addressing the reality of the countryโ€™s orphan wells disagree. โ€œWe have a welfare system for oil and gas. I hope you understand that,โ€ said New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands Stephanie Garcia Richard, who oversees the stateโ€™s public lands. New Mexico has already documented more than 1,700 orphan wells across the state. โ€œWe have oil and gas welfare queens.โ€

In New Mexico, Garcia Richard is trying to hold accountable one of the myriad drillers that have followed key steps in the playbook, the oil company known as Siana.

Siana is made up of two related entities โ€” Siana Oil and Gas Co. LLC and Siana Operating LLC โ€” based in Midland and Conroe, Texas. The company operated 11 wells in southeastern New Mexico in the heart of the Permian Basin.

In reality, Siana is the corporate shield for a man named Tom Ragsdale. After he aggregated his few wells, he generated cash through a trickle of oil and gas production and set up a business injecting other companiesโ€™ wastewater into his wells to dispose of it. But the state worried that Ragsdaleโ€™s operations were polluting the environment and that he was refusing to pay royalties and rental fees he owed the state, according to State Land Office staff.

Ragsdale did not respond to repeated requests for comment from ProPublica and Capital & Main. He also did not appear for a pretrial conference after the state brought legal action against Siana, court records show, and a state court judge ruled against his companies.

Siana was responsible for at least 16 spills, according to New Mexico Oil Conservation Division data, mainly spilling whatโ€™s called produced water, a briny wastewater that comes to the surface alongside oil and gas. โ€œCorrosionโ€ and โ€œEquipment Failureโ€ were among the causes.

The State Land Office hired an engineering firm to study the damage. The firm produced a damning 201-page report in 2018, finding oil and salt contamination exceeding state limits at Sianaโ€™s most polluted site. At high enough levels, these substances can kill plants, harm wildlife and impact human health.

The State Land Office estimated that cleaning up that site alone would cost about $1 million.

In 2020, New Mexico won a judgment against Ragsdaleโ€™s companies that, with interest, is now worth more than $3.5 million. But it wonโ€™t cover the cleanup cost. Between a small bond and the judgment, the state has been able to recover a mere $50,000 or so from Siana and related entities.

When the state tried to collect the rest, Ragsdale placed Siana Oil and Gas in bankruptcy protection in June 2023. Although he listed the company as having millions in assets at the time of the bankruptcy, the company had only $20,500 in a bank account. Court records show Siana is responsible for between $1 million and $10 million in liabilities, including money owed to the state of New Mexico, other oil companies, various counties and others.

Stickers plastered around Sianaโ€™s drill sites โ€” on which the companyโ€™s name is misspelled โ€” provide phone numbers to call in case of leaks or other emergencies. None went to Ragsdale or Siana employees. A man named William Dean answered one number. He owned a local oil field services company called Deanโ€™s Pumping that was contracted to work on Sianaโ€™s wells, but Ragsdale stopped paying its bills, ultimately owing his company tens of thousands of dollars, Dean said.

โ€œHe was trying to half-ass things,โ€ Dean said of Ragsdale. โ€œI donโ€™t know what happened to Tom.โ€

Sianaโ€™s bankruptcy case is ongoing, but Ragsdale has been largely unresponsive even in those proceedings.

Siana is, Garcia Richard said, โ€œan exemplar of how our system has failed.โ€ Although he was very nearly free of his old wells, Ragsdale flouted the playbook and ignored the bankruptcy judgeโ€™s demands that he participate in the case. In an unusual move, the judge in late September issued a warrant for Ragsdaleโ€™s arrest to compel him to hand over certain data. The U.S. Marshals Service was investigating Ragsdaleโ€™s whereabouts but had not taken him into custody as of mid-December, according to an agency representative.

The day after the judge issued the arrest warrant, the bankruptcy trustee filed a complaint alleging Ragsdale had committed fraud, siphoning about $2.4 million from Siana to purchase real estate in Houston.

That money could have gone toward cleaning up the mess left to New Mexico taxpayers.

ProPublica and Capital & Main visited Sianaโ€™s 11 wells in late 2023. At one drill site, methane leaked from a wellhead that had also stained the surrounding land black from spilled oil. The air was sour with the smell of toxic hydrogen sulfide. A nearby tank that held oil for processing was rusted through. Another had leaked an unidentified liquid. There appeared to be hoofprints where cattle had tracked through the polluted mud.

ProPublica and Capital & Main found oil spills at multiple Siana wells. At others, the idle pump jacks stood silent โ€” corroded skeletons at the end of the line, the detritus of another run through the playbook.

Efforts to reform the system that has shielded oil companies from liability have been haphazard. When the federal government rewrote its rule setting bond levels on federal public land earlier this year, a simple math error meant the government would ask oil companies to set aside around $400 million less in bonds than it wouldโ€™ve otherwise. And when states have tried to pass reforms, theyโ€™ve been stymied by state legislatorsโ€™ and regulatorsโ€™ chummy relationships with the industry.

As an ever-greater share of wells go offline and the economy transitions to cleaner forms of energy, policymakers face a choice: Do they focus attention on propping up or cleaning up the industry?

Sgamma of the Western Energy Alliance gives voice to one path forward. โ€œAny time a well goes into an orphan status, itโ€™s not a good thing,โ€ Sgamma said, yet her group has been instrumental in killing efforts to address the orphan well epidemic and the oil industryโ€™s contributions to climate change. Her organization is suing to halt the federal rule that sought to bring bonding levels closer to true plugging costs.

Sgamma co-authored the energy section of Project 2025, the conservative policy paper with deep ties to the first Trump administration that lays out policy priorities for a conservative White House. The plan would โ€œStop the war on oil and natural gas,โ€ reopen undeveloped habitat from Alaska to Colorado for drilling, increase the number of sales for oil leases on public lands and shrink federal environmental agencies. President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly indicated this closely aligns with his vision for pumping Americaโ€™s โ€œliquid gold.โ€ He has begun staffing his administration with pro-oil and gas figures.

The future for which Sgamma is fighting sees a resilient American oil and gas industry, able to โ€œtake a lot of punchesโ€ while continuing to grow unabated.

Or thereโ€™s the future Garcia Richard, who oversees New Mexicoโ€™s public land, envisions. She has paused the leasing of public land to drillers until the Legislature forces oil companies to pay state taxpayers higher royalties that reflect fair market rates. She directed her staff to aggressively pursue companies like Siana. And her office is preparing to raise required bonding levels. As she talked about this work, she held up the literal rubber stamp that imparts the State Land Officeโ€™s seal on documents, suggesting thatโ€™s not how business is done anymore. She also held up a small notebook where she tracks the numerous companies her office is pursuing for polluting the stateโ€™s land and water.

In her future, Garcia Richard said, oil drillers wouldnโ€™t behave like Siana and Ragsdale. โ€œA good-acting company is a company that understands thereโ€™s a cost of doing business that shouldnโ€™t be borne by the landowner, shouldnโ€™t be borne by the taxpayers,โ€ she said. But in the modern American oil industry, she added, the playbook and the still-burning fuse of the cleanup time bomb represent little more than โ€œWild West behavior.โ€

Snow scientists say cloud seeding has big potential — Alex Hager (KUNC.org)

Scenes from the Seeded and Natural Orographic Wintertime Clouds: The Idaho Experiment (SNOWIE) project, which was undertaken in Idahoโ€™s Payette Basin in winter 2017. Credit: Joshua Aikins via Aspen Journalism

Click the link to read the article on the KUNC website (Alex Hager):

January 20, 2025

This story is part of ongoing coverage of the Colorado River, produced by KUNC in Colorado and supported by the Walton Family Foundation. KUNC is solely responsible for its editorial coverage.

It sounds like science fiction, but humans have the power to change the weather. What they donโ€™t have, though, is enough data about how well it works.

Thatโ€™s according to a new study from the Government Accountability Office, which recently released a report on cloud seeding โ€“ a technology that adds chemical compounds to existing clouds and can cause them to drop more rain or snow.

Cloud seeding can seem like an obvious solution for the drought-stricken Colorado River Basin, which gets most of its water from Rocky Mountain snowmelt and has seen a downward trend in annual supplies. Historically, policymakers have been slow to embrace the technology, choosing to focus more money and energy on reducing water demand rather than increasing water supply. Meanwhile, advocates for the practice say increased cloud seeding makes sense now.

The GAOโ€™s study says reliable information on the effectiveness of cloud seeding could be standing in the way of a broader rollout, because policymakers donโ€™t currently know if itโ€™s worth the money.

โ€œThe people in charge of making those decisions have to consider return on investment,โ€ said Karen Howard, the GAOโ€™s director of science, technology assessment, and analytics. โ€œWhen it’s not entirely clear what the effectiveness is, I think those decisions can be difficult to make.โ€

The GAO report identified a few other obstacles besides the limited data.

One of the most common methods of cloud seeding involves the addition of silver iodide to clouds. That chemical compound is considered safe, but the report says more testing is needed to make sure itโ€™s still safe when applied across wider areas.

In its current capacity, Howard said, cloud seeding work could be useful to add more snow to an individual ski resort, but those efforts would need to get a lot bigger to make a significant impact on the amount of snowmelt that feeds major Western rivers.

โ€œAlmost all cloud seeding is very local in nature,โ€ she said. โ€œSo you would need a lot of seeding operations in order to cover an entire mountain range.โ€

Snowy mountains loom over Colorado’s Lake Dillon reservoir on April 22, 2024. The Colorado River system gets the vast majority of its water from mountain snowmelt, so water managers eagerly watch high-altitude weather to build forecasts for water supply. Alex Hager/KUNC

Meanwhile, on the ground in Colorado, one of the stateโ€™s foremost cloud seeding experts says more funding is needed to expand the stateโ€™s work.

โ€œAbsolutely, I’m confident that it’s effective,โ€ said Andrew Rickert, manager of the Colorado Water Conservation Boardโ€™s weather modification program. โ€œThat doesn’t mean that we can’t make it better.โ€

Rickert said he works with a roughly $1.5 million budget. That is relatively modest in comparison to the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on developing other solutions to the Colorado Riverโ€™s supply-demand imbalance โ€“ such as paying farmers to use less water on their crops or developing technology that can recycle sewage back into drinking water. He also pointed to other state and private programs around the region that are quietly making advances to cloud seeding technology.

โ€œWe have the data that cloud seeding works,โ€ he said. โ€œWe’ve been doing it since the early 1950s. I wish we had more funding to throw behind this.โ€

Cloud-seeding graphic via Science Matters

So, if the technology is effective and government agencies are spending billions to try and solve the Colorado River Crisis, why arenโ€™t they doing more to boost cloud seeding?

โ€œThe problem is levels of magnitude above what any weather modification can fix,โ€ said Amy Ostdiek, chief of the interstate, federal and water information section at the Colorado Water Conservation Board.

Ostdiek said cloud seeding is โ€œone of the tools in the toolkitโ€ for Colorado and other states dealing with dry conditions, and emphasized the importance of reining in water demand.

โ€œWe know [cloud seeding] is not going to solve all of the basinโ€™s problems, but we know that it works for a limited purpose,โ€ she said. โ€œSo it’s not as controversial or as sexy as all the other things going on in the basin. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t work, it’s just kind of chugging along.โ€

Rickert, who directs Coloradoโ€™s cloud seeding program, thinks itโ€™s worth big investment even as policymakers focus on demand reductions.

โ€œYou have people like Elon Musk trying to get us to Mars, but you know, why wouldnโ€™t he put serious money behind cloud seeding?โ€ Rickert said. โ€œYou have like representative Marjorie Taylor Greene spouting all this stuff about geoengineering. Let’s put some real science and money behind this and show people that we can increase our water in a safe and efficient manner.โ€

Scenes from the Seeded and Natural Orographic Wintertime Clouds: The Idaho Experiment (SNOWIE) project, which was undertaken in Idahoโ€™s Payette Basin in winter 2017. Credit: Joshua Aikins via Aspen Journalism

Alternatives Report: Post-2026 Operational Guidelines and Strategies for #LakePowell and #LakeMead — Reclamation

Click the link to access the report. Here’s the executive summary:

January 2025

In December 2007 the Secretary of the Interior adopted coordinated operating guidelines for operation of Glen Canyon Dam and Hoover Dam for an interim period that expires in 2026.To address long-term Colorado River operations after the expiration of these guidelines, the United States Department of the Interior initiated a National Environmental Policy Act process on June 16, 2023, to develop and adopt successor domestic guidelines and agreements for the operation of Glen Canyon Dam and Hoover Dam to take effect in mid-2026, before the current operational framework expires. On November 20, 2024, the Bureau of Reclamation published the range of alternatives planned for analysis in the draft environmental impact statement and committed to providing additional information in a subsequent report. This report describes these alternatives and the process for developing them in more detail.

The alternatives were developed over the past year and incorporate considerable input received from the Colorado River Basin States, Colorado River Basin Tribes, conservation organizations, other federal agencies, and other stakeholders during that time. Throughout 2024, the Bureau of Reclamation worked extensively with these key partners to integrate their input into the range of alternatives. The alternatives identified in this report provide a reasonable and broad range of Colorado River operations that capture an appropriate range of potential environmental impacts from implementing new operational guidelines post-2026.

The five alternatives described in detail in this report are:

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2024. Credit: Brad Udall

No Action Alternative โ€“ Included as a requirement of the National Environmental Policy Act, the No Action Alternative assumes Colorado River operations would revert to annual determinations announced through the Annual Operating Plan for Colorado River Reservoirs process and be based on operating guidance in place prior to the adoption of the 2007 Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead.

Federal Authorities Alternative โ€“ This alternative is designed to achieve protection of critical infrastructure within the Department of the Interiorโ€™s and Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s current statutory authorities and absent new stakeholder agreements.

Federal Authorities Hybrid Alternative โ€“ This alternative is based on proposals and concepts from Tribes, federal agencies, and other stakeholders and is designed to achieve protection of critical infrastructure while benefitting key resources through an approach to distributing storage between Lake Powell and Lake Mead that enhances the reservoirsโ€™ ability to support the Colorado River Basin.

Receding waters at Lone Rock in Lake Powell illustrate the impacts of megadrought. Hydroelectric generation will be endangered if the lake continues to shrink. Credit: Colorado State University

Cooperative Conservation Alternative โ€“ This alternative is informed by a proposal submitted by a consortium of conservation organizations with the goal of stabilizing system storage, integrating stewardship and mitigation strategies of Lake Powell and Lake Mead, maintaining opportunities for binational cooperative measures, incentivizing water conservation, and designing flexible water management strategies.

Hoover Dam with Lake Mead in the background December 3, 2024.

Basin Hybrid Alternative โ€“ This alternative reflects components of the proposals and concepts submitted by the Upper Division States, Lower Division States, and Colorado River Basin Tribes that could provide a basis for coordinated operations and may facilitate greater agreement across the Basin.

Releasing the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s intended approach to the alternatives in advance of publishing the draft environmental impact statement enhances transparency and public understanding of this important National Environmental Policy Act process and provides greater opportunities for collaboration. Information submitted following the November 20, 2024, publication of the range of alternatives has not been considered in this report. Following the publication of this report, the Bureau of Reclamation will continue its efforts working with Colorado River Basin partners and stakeholders and will analyze information submitted after November 20, 2024. The Bureau of Reclamation will also prepare the environmental impact analysis for the draft environmental impact statement.

Colorado River “Beginnings”. Photo: Brent Gardner-Smith/Aspen Journalism

Southwestern Water Conservation District awarded $25.6M grant: Money will fund projects supporting aquatic ecosystems during periods of #drought — The #Durango Herald

A headgate on an irrigation ditch on Maroon Creek, a tributary of the Roaring Fork River. Photo credit: Aspen Journalism/Brent Gardner-Smith

Click the link to read the article on The Durango Herald website (Jessica Bowman):

January 21, 2025

A news release from the SWCD said the funding will support 17 projects aimed at supporting aquatic ecosystems during periods of drought across the Dolores and San Juan River Basins in Southwest Colorado. General Manager of SWCD, Steve Wolff, said the projects will address three broad categories: the removal of invasive plants, erosion control and habitat connectivity…One example Wolff provided was the rebuilding of headgates โ€“ structures at the tops of stream diversions that regulate water flow โ€“ to allow fish to move upstream and downstream during periods of drought. The projects were selected on their feasibility, readiness and level of local engagement, and had the support of 37 different federal, state, tribal and local entities representing regional and local stakeholders.

In 2023, the SWCD board of directors organized a partnership of over 30 regional groups in preparation for the B2E grant application after recognizing the need for rural stakeholders in Southwest Colorado to compete more effectively for federal funding. Southwest Colorado has always needed a lot of funding; it has numerous small conservation districts, irrigation districts and conservation groups that individually lack the capacity to prepare applications for large federal grants, Wolff said. The final grant contract isnโ€™t expected to be executed until late 2025 or early 2026. All funding must be spent by Sept. 30, 2031.

San Juan River Basin. Graphic credit Wikipedia.
Dolores River watershed

The Donald Trump Burr Trail? Oy! Plus: More Biden public lands action; uranium mine safety violations — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org)

The Burr Trail as it approaches the western boundary of Capitol Reef National Park. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on the Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

January 17, 2024

๐Ÿคฏ Crazytown Chronicle ๐Ÿคก

You really canโ€™t make this stuff up: The Garfield County board of commissioners really wants to name a highway in their midst after President-elect Donald Trump. They will consider two options at their Jan. 27 meeting, with the first one being to change the โ€œBurr Trail Scenic Backwayโ€ to the โ€œDonald J. Trump Presidential Burr Trail Backway.โ€

Oy frigging vey.

The Burr Trail, which runs from Boulder, Utah, through Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, the Waterpocket Fold, and Capitol Reef National Park, ending up just outside Ticaboo, started out as a livestock trail in the 1880s and is named after rancher John Atlantic Burr. It is now not only a spectacularly scenic drive, but also one of the most controversial roads in the West.

Portions of the trail became a road in 1948, when the Atomic Energy Commission bulldozed the switchbacks through the Waterpocket Fold to provide motorized access to uranium mining claims. According to a National Park Service history, the road was widely used by uranium miners throughout the โ€˜50s and into the โ€˜60s. In 1967 the federal government funded improvements to the route as part of a project to provide road access to the new Bullfrog Marina on Lake Powell (which started filling up in 1963)

The Silver Bullet on the Burr Trail just above the switchbacks in Capitol Reef National Park. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Ever since, Garfield County has wanted to continue to improve the road and, ultimately, pave its entire 66 miles, thinking it would attract a more conventional, bigger-spending brand of tourists than the dirtbag backpackers that frequented the region in the 70s and 80s. The county was in tough shape economically, largely because market forces were crushing the uranium mining industry and small-scale ranching, and so it was looking to fill the void with tourism. In 1983, Wayne County Commissioner and paving advocate H. Dell LeFevre told the New York Times:

Coyote Gulch’s VW Bus South Park 1973.

Environmental groups and the National Park Service, however, have pushed back, saying paving the gravel, washboarded route would encroach on federal lands and increase access โ€” and impacts โ€” to the backcountry. Conservationists launched lawsuits countering county claims that it owns the road and should control how itโ€™s maintained.

The Burr Trail thus became yet another symbol in the long-running culture war over roads, federal land management, and an arcane federal mining law statute known as RS-2477.

In 1987, as an environmental lawsuit seeking to block blacktopping made its way through the courts, someone poured sugar into the fuel tanks of Garfield County bulldozers being used to work on the Trail, a la the Monkey Wrench Gang. A local uranium miner and founding member of what would become the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance was charged with the crime but acquitted.

Shortly thereafter, a district judge ruled against the environmentalists and allowed the BLM to greenlight Garfield Countyโ€™s bid to blacktop the section of road from Boulder to the western boundary of Capitol Reef National Park.

That didnโ€™t end the battle, however. Garfield County has continued its crusade to pave the remainder of the route, and the Burr Trail has been featured in many a court case. In 1996, the National Park Service dragged the county to court after its crews bulldozed a hill to fix a blind corner. And in 2019, Trumpโ€™s Bureau of Land Management permitted it to chip-seal a seven-mile section on the other side of Capitol Reef NP; the county carried out the work before environmentalists had a chance to challenge it. A judge ultimately let the asphalt remain.2

The Burr Trail, in other words, is almost as polarizing as a certain president-elect, which could be one reason a rural Utah county wants to rename the backroad after a Manhattan real estate baron and reality TV show host who has never set foot in that part of the world and sure as hell couldnโ€™t tell a juniper from a piรฑon tree even if a giant coyote whacked him over his orange head with it.

But Garfield County Commissioner Leland Pollack says he wants to rename the route to show his appreciation for Trumpโ€™s first-term policies, including shrinking Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, telling KSL: โ€œThis is just a sign of appreciation. This guy right here was good to Garfield County and he was good to all of the Western public land counties.โ€ Sure, Leland.

The Grand Staircase-Escalante Partners opposes the renaming, even going so far as to refuse to utter the proposed new name in its press release. The statement notes:

๐ŸŒต Public Lands ๐ŸŒฒ

In its waning days, the Biden administration has been quite active on the public lands front. In a future post Iโ€™ll get into Bidenโ€™s environmental legacy, but for now hereโ€™s a quick rundown of some of the administrationโ€™s latter-day moves:

  • Bidenโ€™s designation of the Chuckwalla National Monument in southern California adds another link to what is now being called the Moab to Mojave Conservation Corridor, a strip of protected lands that follows the Colorado River from southeastern Utah to the Mojave Desert. Prior to Chuckwalla, Biden bolstered the corridor by restoring Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments and by establishing the Baaj Nwaavjo Iโ€™tah Kukveni and Avi Kwa Ame national monuments.
Source: National Parks Conservation Association
  • The administration finalized the management plans for both Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments. Iโ€™m not going to give a full rundown on the plans here, because they are so similar to the draft plans, which I detailed in earlier dispatches (GSENM & Bears Ears). There are a few modifications, however. Perhaps most significant is that a ban on recreational shooting throughout Bears Ears was scaled back to apply only to campgrounds, developed recreation sites, rock writing sites, and structural cultural sites. Meanwhile, both plans, especially Bears Ears, take an overly laissez faire approach to livestock grazing, perpetuating impacts on ecological and cultural resources.
  • The federal Bureau of Land Management terminated Utahโ€™s right of way for a proposed four-lane highway across the Red Cliffs Conservation Area outside St. George. The state and Washington County have been trying for years to build the road in order to โ€œaccommodateโ€ the areaโ€™s breakneck growth. In 2020, the Trump administration finally issued a right of way, but conservationists sued and forced the BLM to reconsider. In December, the agency sided with the conservationists, revoking the right of way and suggesting St. George expand the existing Red Hills Parkway rather than build a new road through desert tortoise habitat.
  • The Interior Department launched the process of banning new mining claims and mineral leases on about 270,000 acres of federal land (plus an additional 40,000 acres of private land the feds hope to acquire) near Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge in Nevada. Conservationists had been looking to get added protections on the area after lithium mining and geothermal energy companies began eyeing it.

***

Republican lawmakers have launched their latest bid to diminish a presidentโ€™s power to protect landscapes and cultural resources. This week, Rep. Celeste Maloy, of Utah (and who happens to be Ammon Bundyโ€™s cousin), and Rep. Mark Amodei, of Nevada, introduced the Ending Presidential Overreach on Public Lands Act, which would gut the 1906 Antiquities Act and end a presidentโ€™s power to establish national monuments. I doubt this will make it very far, since national monuments and parks are pretty damned popular, and Grand Canyon, Zion, Arches, and many other national parks were first established as national monuments under the Antiquities Act.

***

On that note, the Senate held hearings on Trumpโ€™s nominee for Interior Secretary, Doug Burgum. Burgum is the former governor of North Dakota, which, by the way, is not considered a public lands state. So itโ€™s a bit bizarre that heโ€™s even being considered for this position โ€” except he is big on fossil fuels and is clearly on board with Trumpโ€™s โ€œdrill, baby, drill-energy dominanceโ€ approach. In the clips I saw, Burgum displayed a lack of knowledge on the public lands he will probably soon oversee. For example, he talked about timber harvesting on public lands, when most public-land logging occurs on U.S. Forest Service land, which is overseen by the Agriculture Department, not Interior. Then he responded to a question about the aforementioned Antiquities Act, saying: โ€œThe 1905 Antiquities Act โ€ฆ itโ€™s original intention was to protect โ€ฆ antiquities โ€ฆ areas like Indiana Jones type archaeological protections.โ€ Uhhhโ€ฆ that would be the 1906 act, buddy. And what the hell are Indiana Jones type archaeological protections? Do we really want an Interior Secretary who gleans his knowledge from the movies? Oy.

During his confirmation hearing this AM, @dougburgum.bsky.social said the Antiquities Act was meant only for "Indiana Jones-type archeological protections."Does he know his hero Teddy Roosevelt used the AA to protect 800,000 acres in and around the Grand Canyon?

Center for Western Priorities (@westernpriorities.org) 2025-01-16T19:54:10.979Z

โ›๏ธMining Monitor โ›๏ธ

Energy Fuels โ€” the owner of the White Mesa uranium mill and the Pinyon Plain mine โ€” is perhaps the most active of all the uranium companies making a lot of noise about exploration and reopening long-idled facilities. They are also the most vocal, telling reporters that current safety and environmental standards and regulations and enforcement are far better than during the Cold War era when the industry ravaged lives and the landscape.

As if to prove the point, the federal Mine Safety & Health Administration recently issued 16 citations to Energy Fuels and its contractors working on the companyโ€™s La Sal Mines Complex in southeastern Utah. Violations related to radon concentration and radon monitoring requirements, worker training, personal protection equipment use, and explosive material storage.

Sarah Fields, of Uranium Watch, says sheโ€™s โ€œnever seen this many violations of this nature at an operating uranium mine from a single inspection.โ€

One of the contractors, Three Steps Resources, is run by Kyle Kimmerle, holder of numerous mining claims throughout southern Utah and a party to Utahโ€™s lawsuit seeking to revoke Bears Ears National Monument.


1 LeFevre would become an outspoken opponent of Bill Clintonโ€™s 1996 designation of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Interestingly, many opponents of that and the Bears Ears designation worried that they would increase industrial-scale tourism.

2 Garfield County also wants to pave a portion, at least, of the Hole-in-the-Rock road, which also crosses a section of GSENM near Escalante. Conservationists are also pushing back.

$24.97 million to support #RioGrande headwaters conservation projects: Federal funding comes in final days of Biden Administration; will support restoration efforts in #Colorado and #NewMexico — #Alamosa Citizen

Rio Grande, looking south near Cole Park. The Alamosa Riverfront Project is among several that received funding last week under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Credit: The Citizen

Click the link to read the article on the Alamosa Citizen website:

January 20, 2025

Conservationists focused on the Rio Grande Basin signal it as an initial win in a battle for federal dollars to address the impacts of drought and the need for a sustainable water supply.

Theyโ€™ve seen how the federal government has kicked into gear to address the same issues on the Colorado River Basin, and have wondered why the Rio Grande Basin largely has been ignored.

Until now. 

The U.S. Department of Interior and Bureau of Reclamation announced last week in the final days of the Biden Administration a $24.97 million award to support water conservation and habitat restoration efforts in the headwaters of the Rio Grande.

Itโ€™s a drop in the bucket compared to the billions that have been awarded to projects on the Colorado River, but itโ€™s a start.

โ€œTodayโ€™s announcement provides a critical down payment that will make the headwaters of the Rio Grande better prepared to handle the ongoing impacts of drought, while supporting state and local efforts to sustainably manage water supplies for future generations,โ€ said Alexander Funk, Director of Water Resources, Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.

The money came through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and was among the final announcements by the Biden Administration of funding awarded through the federal legislation. 

The significance of that is nobody in the agriculture, conservation, and water world knows if the incoming Trump Administration will carry on with the Inflation Reduction Act, or if that particular federal legislation and the $369 billion approved by Congress falls to the wayside.

โ€œWeโ€™re shocked we got anything,โ€ said Amber Pacheco of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and member of the Rio Grande Basin Roundtable. She described a rush at the end to send to the Bureau of Reclamation โ€œshovel-readyโ€ projects that could earn IRA funding.

โ€œIt was a โ€˜quick overnight, send some projects that we can fund,โ€™โ€ said Pacheco.

Rio Grande and Pecos River basins. Map credit: By Kmusser – Own work, Elevation data from SRTM, drainage basin from GTOPO [1], U.S. stream from the National Atlas [2], all other features from Vector Map., CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11218868

Out of the award comes funding for a variety of projects in the San Luis Valley as well projects for the middle Rio Grande in New Mexico. Overall, $18 million will go toward Rio Grande Basin projects in Colorado and $7 million for Rio Grande restoration efforts in New Mexico.

The San Luis Valley and Conejos Water Conservancy Districts, the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and the Rio Grande National Forest in southern Colorado are among the eight recipients selected under one cooperative agreement to receive $24.9 million for several drought resiliency activities in the Upper Rio Grande Basin, the Bureau of Reclamation said in announcing the money.

For the Valley, those projects will include the Alamosa Riverfront Restoration project; Rio Grande Reservoir Low Flow Valve; Pine River Weminuche Pass Ditch Turnback Structure; Lower Conejos River Restoration Project; Platoro Reservoir Restoration and Wildfire Risk Mitigation Project โ€“ Phase 1; Saguache Creek Multi-benefit Restoration at Upper Crossing Station; and Rio Grande Confluence Restoration Project, among others.

โ€œThis announcement shows that when Colorado and New Mexico work together, big things can help that benefit fish and wildlife, support local economies, and tackle some of the regionโ€™s most pressing water challenges,โ€ said Funk.

โ€œThe Rio Grande is the underpinning that supports the economic and ecological health of the region. This funding allows conservation partners to critically address and relieve the challenges this habitat and community have experienced from long-term drought and sustainability insecurity,โ€ said Tracy Stephens, senior specialist for riparian connectivity at The National Wildlife Federation. โ€œWe applaud the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s investment and recognition of the importance of riparian health and habitat connectivity. This funding is an important step forward in a collective effort to achieve well-connected and functional riparian corridors to protect the wellbeing of people, plants, and wildlife in the Upper Rio Grande.โ€

Screen shot from the Vimeo film, “Rio Grande Headwaters Restoration Project: Five Ditches,” https://vimeo.com/364411112

Report details the stateโ€™s โ€˜meaningfulโ€™ progress getting more water to the #GreatSaltLake — ย Kyle Dunpheyย (#Utah News Dispatch) #aridification

The shores of the Great Salt Lake near Syracuse are pictured on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)

Click the link to read the article on the Utah News-Dispatch website (Kyle Dunphey):

January 15, 2025

For the last several years, Utahโ€™s lawmakers and environmental officials have made getting water to the Great Salt Lake a priority, through policies like letting the state lease water rights from farmers, or installing new equipment to measure water flows. 

Now, a new report details the progress and impacts some of those policies are having, calling the work done so far โ€œmeaningful.โ€ 

On Tuesday, the Great Salt Lake Strike Team issued its 2025 data and insights summary, released just in time for lawmakers to review for the upcoming General Legislative Session, which starts next week.

The Great Salt Lake hit a historic low in 2022, bottoming out at 4,188.5 feet. Lawmakers and state officials prioritized the lake that following legislative session โ€” then the winters of 2023 and 2024 brought above-average snowfall, causing the lake levels to rebound slightly. On Wednesday, both the north and south arms hovered around 4,192 feet, still several feet below the โ€œecologically healthyโ€ level of 4,198 feet. 

Formed in 2023, the Great Salt Lake Strike Team is made up of researchers from the University of Utah and Utah State University, working with officials from the Utah departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Food, Environmental Quality and more. 

The data-heavy 28-page report released this week outlines everything from the economic benefit of the Great Salt Lake, to locations of the dust โ€œhotspotsโ€ on the dry lakebed that pose a health risk to the Wasatch Front, to models for future scenarios, and more.

The shores of the Great Salt Lake near Antelope Island are pictured on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)

The report also details some of the progress made in the last year that delivered more water to the lake. Consider this:

  • More than 288,000 acre-feet of water has been approved to flow to the lake, through users either leasing or donating their water right to the state. Thatโ€™s enough water to fill both Jordanelle and Rockport reservoirs, although the report notes thatโ€™s just whatโ€™s been approved, and doesnโ€™t represent the actual amount of water thatโ€™s been delivered.ย 
  • The Legislature is spending $1 million in one-time funds and $1 million in annual funds to install measurement infrastructure so the Utah Division of Water Rights can see exactlyย how much water is flowing to the lake. An additional $3 million from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Geological Survey is also going toward measurement equipment.ย 
  • In addition to funding for water monitoring, state and federal governments have thrown nearly $100 million at the lake for various projects, includingย $50 millionย from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for conservation; $5.4 million from the state for wetland conservation; $22 million from the state for Great Salt Lake water infrastructure projects; $15 million from the state to the Great Salt Lake Commissionerโ€™s Office to help lease water; and $1.5 million to start a state-funded study exploring ways to deliver more water from Utah Lake to the Great Salt Lake.
  • Compass Minerals and Morton Salt, which both operate on the lake, donated a total of 255,298 acre-feet of water to the state.ย Compass Mineralsย is also relinquishing about 65,000 acres of leased land to the state for conservation purposes.ย 
  • Lawmakers in 2024 passed a number of bills to help the lake, including tightened regulations and taxes on mineral extraction, allowing agricultural water users to sell leased water and restricting the use of overhead sprinklers for new government construction in the Great Salt Lake Basin.ย 
  • There have also been some environmental wins. Brine shrimp populations are rebounding, with a 50% increase in egg numbers compared to last year. American white pelicans returned to their nesting sites on the lake. And the state removed 15,600 acres of phragmites, an invasive plant.

The report notes that the state has made โ€œmeaningful progress.โ€ And while it clarifies that the report is purely data-focused and doesnโ€™t make policy recommendations, it does lay out โ€œpotential policy levers.โ€ 

An American avocet is pictured at the Great Salt Lake near Antelope Island on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)

That includes greater incentives for water leasing. The state made several new options available for water right holders, including letting farmers lease water for a portion of the year, water banking (which gives water users more flexibility over leasing agreements) and applications allowing users to quantify water saved through optimization projects. 

But according to the report, the state hasnโ€™t yet received any applications for these three programs. 

The Utah Legislature also recently subsidized the installation of secondary water meters, so water districts know how much theyโ€™re using โ€” those meters are often associated with water savings. The report recommends water districts in the Great Salt Lake Basin donate or lease that saved water for the lake. 

โ€œAll indications demonstrate that delivering more water to the lake is a far more cost-effective solution than managing the impacts of a lake at a perpetually low level,โ€ said Brian Steed, the co-chair of the strike team and Great Salt Lake Commissioner. โ€œWe can invest time and financial resources now or pay much later. Fortunately, we have great data and a balanced and workable plan to succeed.โ€

Sunset from the western shore of Antelope Island State Park, Great Salt Lake, Utah, United States.. Sunset viewed from White Rock Bay, on the western shore of Antelope Island. Carrington Island is visible in the distance. By Ccmdav – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2032320

Water-short #RepublicanRiver Basin hits farm dry-up milestone, as #Kansas looks on — Jerd Smith (Fresh Water News)

Republican River in Colorado January 2023 near the Nebraska border. Photo credit: Allen Best/Big Pivots

Click the link to read the article on the Water Education Colorado website (Jerd Smith):

January 16, 2025

Farm communities on the Eastern Plains, under the gun to deliver water to Kansas and Nebraska, are poised to permanently retire 17,000 acres of land, with the help of $30 million in state and federal funding.

Creating a balance of water that’s taken from aquifers and water that replenishes aquifers is an important aspect of making sure water will be available when itโ€™s needed. Image from โ€œGetting down to facts: A Visual Guide to Water in the Pinal Active Management Area,โ€ courtesy of Ashley Hullinger and the University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center

From Wray, to Yuma to Burlington, growers are being paid to permanently shut off irrigation wells linked to the Republican River to ensure the vital waterway can deliver enough water to neighbors to the east, as required under the Republican River Compact of 1943.

As of this month, ranchers had already retired 10,000 acres under the program, and the rest will be set aside in coming months.

By 2029, the region must retire an additional 8,000 acres, as required under a compact resolution signed in 2016, for a total of 25,000 acres, according to Deb Daniel, general manager of the Republican River Water Conservation District, which is overseeing the initiative.  This is occurring in an area on the south fork of the river.

According to Colorado State University it is one of the largest dry-ups of irrigated agricultural lands in the West.

The dry-up has allowed Colorado to meet a critical deadline with Kansas, demonstrating that it was making progress on the goal.

Coloradoโ€™s Republican River Basin. Credit: State of Colorado.

โ€œWe did it,โ€ said Daniel. But more work remains. 

The 2022 funding came under the American Rescue Plan Act, the COVID-relief program that Congress approved giving states hundreds of millions of dollars to buffer the effects of the pandemic.

Through that program, Colorado lawmakers approved $30 million to the Republican and $30 million to the Rio Grande Basin as well for a similar program.

This year, the Republican Basin will receive another $6 million in state funding to continue paying farmers to permanently shut off wells.

โ€œAgriculture is the economic driver for the northeastern counties of Colorado. This is a difficult situation for the producers,โ€ said Jason Ullmann, state engineer with the Colorado Division of Water Resources. โ€œI know this work hasnโ€™t been easy, and more must be done. I applaud the Republican River Water Conservation District for their major efforts to reach this deadline,โ€ he said in a statement.

A new analysis shows a nearly 30% decline in Coloradoโ€™s irrigated lands in the last 25 years, driven in part by the stateโ€™s legal obligations to deliver water across state boundaries, as in the Republican Basin. Other factors include declining river flows due to climate change and drought, and the dry-up of farmlands by fast-growing cities.

Daniel said water officials hope they can continue to pay farmers to permanently retire land and to do so in a way that doesnโ€™t cripple the regional economy.

โ€œWe need time to let these communities adjust, to adapt to having less irrigated agriculture. As these wells go down, our communities are adjusting, but most of the time, unless they have other industries, the communities just go away,โ€ Daniel said.

More by Jerd Smith

More than 9,000 Landsat images provide vegetation health metrics for the Republican River Basin. Credit: David Hyndman

Forest Service presents results of beaver inventory — Heather Sackett (AspenJournalism.org) #FryingpanRiver #RoaringForkRiver #ColoradoRiver

Beavers have constructed a network of dams and lodges on this Woody Creek property. Pitkin County funded a two-year beaver inventory in the headwaters of the Roaring Fork and its tributaries. Credit: HEATHER SACKETT/Aspen Journalism

Click the link to read the article on the Aspen Journalism website (Heather Sackett):

January 17, 2025

Thanks to Pitkin County, local land managers now have more information about beavers and their habitat, which could eventually lead to projects aimed at improving stream conditions.

Over the summers of 2023 and 2024, technicians with the U.S. Forest Service covered roughly 353,000 acres of land throughout the headwaters of the Roaring Fork River and its tributaries, surveying 296 randomly chosen sites on 66 streams for beavers, their dams and lodges or other signs they had once been there like chewed sticks. The surveys, which were funded with $100,000 from Pitkin County Healthy Rivers, found that 17% of the sites were currently occupied by beaver, 34% of the sites had some signs of beaver and 37% of sites had evidence of past beaver occupation. 

Clay Ramey, a fisheries biologist with the White River National Forest, presented the findings of the two-year inventory to the Healthy Rivers board at its regular meeting Thursday evening. 

โ€œIt would seem that while beaver were once common there, the vegetation has shifted from aspen to conifer and therefore that area doesnโ€™t appear to have a lot of potential for beaver in its current state,โ€ the inventory report reads.

Another interesting finding from the inventory is that there is less willow found in areas where cattle graze. But what that means for beavers is unclear. 

โ€œThe beavers are occupying grazed areas and ungrazed areas basically to the same extent,โ€ Ramey said. โ€œSo there was nothing to suggest that beavers are avoiding or being excluded from grazed areas.โ€

Samantha Alford, right, and Stephanie Lewis, technicians with the U.S. Forest Service, measure the slope and width of Conundrum Creek in summer 2023. A two-year inventory of beavers in the headwaters of the Roaring Fork watershed recorded where beavers currently live and where they lived in the past. Credit: HEATHER SACKETT/Aspen Journalism

The information gleaned from the inventory will now help the Forest Service decide where to do prescribed burns and stream restoration projects in an effort to create more and better beaver habitat. Ramey said the Forest Service is undergoing a National Environmental Protection Act process for projects on Fourmile Creek and Middle Thompson Creek. Both creeks had evidence of extensive use by beavers in the past, but Fourmile in particular is currently under-utilized by the animals, with only 3% of sites currently occupied by beavers. Growing more willows may entice beavers back.

Pitkin County Healthy Rivers, whose mission includes improving water quality and quantity, has been working over the past few years to educate the public about the benefits to the ecosystem of having North Americaโ€™s largest rodent on the landscape. Funding the Forest Service beaver inventory is part of the organizationโ€™s โ€œBring Back Beaversโ€ campaign. 

Prized for their pelts by early trappers and later seen as a nuisance to farmers and ranchers, beavers were killed in large numbers and their populations have still not fully recovered. But there has been a growing recognition in recent years that beavers play a crucial role in the health of ecosystems. By building dams that pool water, the engineers of the forest can transform channelized streams into sprawling, soggy floodplains that recharge groundwater, create habitat for other species, improve water quality, and create areas resistant to wildfires and climate change. 

Healthy Rivers Board Chair Kirstin Neff said the ultimate driver of the organizationโ€™s commitment to bringing back beavers is an interest in the health of the Roaring Fork watershed. 

โ€œOur goal is to get good habitat work done on the ground,โ€ Neff said. โ€œThe things weโ€™re concerned about are water availability for wildlife and downstream users and things like wildfire risk.โ€ 

Aspen Journalism, which is solely responsible for its editorial content, is supported by a grant from the Pitkin County Healthy Community Fund.

This story is provided by Aspen Journalism, a nonprofit, investigative news organization covering water, environment, social justice and more. Visit aspenjournalism.org.

Map of the Roaring Fork River drainage basin in western Colorado, USA. Made using USGS data. By Shannon1 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69290878

Lousy #RioGrande #snowpack, but the runoff forecast is not as bad as I thought! — John Fleck (InkStain.net)

Click the link to read the article on the InkStain.net website (John Fleck):

January 9, 2025

The January NRCS Rio Grande runoff forecast is lousy: a mid-point forecast of 65 percent of average at Otowi (upstream of Albuquerque) and 37 percent of average at San Marcial (downstream of Albuquerque). Based on the current snowpack, I expected worse. Forecaster Karl Wetlaufer, in the email distributing the numbers, explains:

Wetlaufer also reminds us that thereโ€™s a lot of snowpack season ahead of us. The numbers above are the median forecast. The one-in-ten wettest side (10 percent exceedence) is ~115% of average at Otowi, and the one-in-ten dry (90 percent exceedence) is less than 20% of average.

EPA takes unprecedented step to remove uranium waste from the Navajo Nation: The decision opens the door for new ways to manage uranium pollution on tribal land — Natalia Mesa (High Country News)

Red Water Pond Road Community leader, Larry King, addresses plans to relocate the Quivera Mine Waste Pile that is located about 1,000 feet from the closest residence. Shayla Blatchford

Click the link to read the article on the High Country News website (Natalia Mesa):

January 17, 2025

As a child, herding her grandmotherโ€™s sheep, Teracita Keyanna unknowingly wandered onto land contaminated with radioactive waste from three abandoned uranium mine and mill waste sites located near her home on the Navajo Nation. 

Keyanna and other Dinรฉ citizens have been living with the consequences of uranium mining near the Red Water Pond Road community since the 1960s. But now, uranium waste rock that has sat for decades at a Superfund site will finally be moved to a landfill off tribal land.

โ€œThis is a seismic shift in policy for Indigenous communities,โ€ said Eric Jantz, an attorney for the New Mexico Environmental Law Center. 

On Jan. 5, in a first-of-its-kind move, the Environmental Protection Agency signed an action memo to transport 1 million cubic yards of low-grade radioactive waste from the Quivira Mining Co. Church Rock Mine to a disposal site at the Red Rock Regional Landfill. The Northwest New Mexico Regional Solid Waste Authority owns and operates the landfill, which is located about 6 miles east of Thoreau, New Mexico. 

โ€œI feel like our community has finally had a win,โ€ Keyanna said. She is a member of the Red Water Pond Road Community Association, a grassroots organization made up of Dinรฉ families that have been advocating for the waste removal for almost two decades. โ€œItโ€™ll help the community heal.โ€

Companies extracted an estimated 30 million tons of uranium ore on or near the Navajo Nation from 1944 to 1986, largely to fuel the federal governmentโ€™s enormous nuclear arsenal. When the mines were abandoned in the 1980s, the toxic waste remained. Today, there are hundreds of abandoned mines in plain sight on the Navajo Nation, contaminating the water, air and soil. Altogether, there are an estimated 15,000 uranium mines across the West โ€” 1,200 of them on the Navajo Nation alone โ€” with the majority located in the Four Corners region. 

The impact of all this mining on Dinรฉ communities has been devastating. A 2008 study found uranium contamination in 29 water sources across the Navajo Nation, while other studies show that people living near waste sites face a high risk of kidney failure and various cancers. 

At Quivira, the cleanup is set to begin in early 2025 and will continue for six to eight years, according to an EPA news release. The permitting process, which will provide opportunity for public comment, will be overseen by the New Mexico authority that manages the proposed waste site and is responsible for its long-term safety monitoring.  

Mine Waste Area with Limited Vegetation. Photo credit: EPA

The EPA had considered multiple options for waste remediation. But for years, Red Water Pond Road advocates and other local organizations continually pushed it to simply remove the waste, a course of action that the EPA has never taken before, even though the Navajo Nation has repeatedly called for the federal government to move all uranium waste from Dinรฉ tribal land. 

Throughout the Navajo Nation, said Jantz, โ€œprior to this decision, EPAโ€™s primary choice in terms of remediation of mine was to bury the piles under some dirt and plant some grass seeds on top, called cap in place.โ€ But studies have shown that this approach is not effective at containing radioactive waste in the long term, he said. 

The agency took a similar approach when addressing the other uranium waste in the Church Rock area. In 2013, the EPA and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees uranium mine-waste cleanup, dumped 1 million cubic yards of waste from the Northeast Church Rock Mine โ€” a different waste site, roughly 3 miles from the Quivira Mine โ€” on top of existing tailings located half a mile from the Red Water Pond Road communities. 

But the EPA plans to handle the Quivira Mineโ€™s waste differently, placing it in geoengineered disposal cells with a groundwater leak protection system after it is moved off-site, an approach that Jantz called โ€œstate-of-the-art.โ€

The Quivira Mine cleanup is part of the 2014 Tronox settlement, which provided $5.15 billion to clean up contaminated sites across the United States. The settlement allocated $1 billion of those funds to clean up 50 uranium mines across the Navajo Nation. 

There is a lot more to be done, said Susan Gordon, coordinator for the Multicultural Alliance for a Safe Environment, a grassroots organization led by uranium-impacted communities. Hundreds of abandoned mines pepper the Navajo Nation, and the EPA has not formulated a broader plan to clean up the majority of them. Funding is also an issue, she added. 

What the EPAโ€™s decision means for the future of uranium mine waste remediation is unclear. Under other circumstances, Jantz said that the decision would signal a sea change for the EPAโ€™s policy of removing waste from the Navajo Nation. But the incoming Trump administration has not indicated its policy on hazardous waste disposal.

As Jantz put it, โ€œAll bets are off.โ€

Graphic credit: Environmental Protection Agency

How America courted increasingly destructive wildfires โˆ’ and what that means for protecting homesย today — The Conversation #ActOnClimate

The Palisades Fire spreads near homes amid a powerful windstorm on Jan. 7, 2025. Mario Tama/Getty Images

Justin Angle, University of Montana

The fires burning in the Los Angeles area are a powerful example of why humans have learned to fear wildfire. Fires can level entire neighborhoods in an instant. They can destroy communities, torch pristine forests and choke even faraway cities with toxic smoke.

Over a century of fire suppression efforts have conditioned Americans to expect wildland firefighters to snuff out fires quickly, even as people build homes deeper into landscapes that regularly burn. But as the LA fires show, and as journalist Nick Mott and I explored in our book โ€œThis Is Wildfire: How to Protect Your Home, Yourself, and Your Community in the Age of Heatโ€ and 2021 podcast โ€œFireline,โ€ this expectation and our societyโ€™s relationship with wildfire need to change.

Over time, extensive fire suppression, home construction in high fire-risk areas and climate change have set the stage for the increasingly destructive wildfires we see today.

The legacy of fire suppression

The way the U.S. deals with wildfires today dates back to around 1910, when the Great Burn torched about 3 million acres across Washington, Idaho, Montana and British Columbia. After watching the fireโ€™s swift and unstoppable spread, the fledgling U.S. Forest Service developed a military-style apparatus built to eradicate wildfire.

The U.S. got really good at putting out fires. So good that citizens grew to accept fire suppression as something the government simply does.

A black and white photo shows a man standing on a mountaintop rock looking through binoculars, with mountains in the background. Another sits on the rock beside him.
A ranger and forest guard on fire patrol duty near Thompson Falls, Mont., in 1909. Forest Service photo by W.J. Lubken

Today, state, federal and private firefighters deploy across the country when fires break out, along with tankers, bulldozers, helicopters and planes. The Forest Service touts a record of snuffing out 98% of wildfires before they burn 100 acres (40 hectares).

One consequence in a place like Los Angeles is that when a wildfire enters an urban environment, the public expects it to be put out before it causes much damage. But the nationโ€™s wildland firefighting systems arenโ€™t designed for that.

Wildland firefighting tactics, such as digging lines to stop a fire from spreading and steering fires toward natural fuel breaks, donโ€™t work in dense neighborhoods like Pacific Palisades. Aerial water and retardant drops canโ€™t happen when high winds make it unsafe to fly. At the same time, the regionโ€™s municipal firefighting forces and water systems werenโ€™t designed for this sort of fire โ€“ a conflagration engulfing entire neighborhoods quickly overwhelms the system.

Long ago, Southern Californiaโ€™s scrub-forest ecosystems would periodically burn, limiting fuel for future fires. But aggressive fire suppression and inattention to urban overgrowth have left excessive, easy-to-ignite vegetation in many areas. Itโ€™s unclear, however, whether prescribed burning could have prevented this catastrophe.

This is primarily a people problem. People have built more homes and cities in fire-prone areas and done so with little regard for wildfire resilience. And the greenhouse gases released by decades of burning fossil fuels to run power plants, industries and vehicles have caused global temperatures to rise, compounding the threat.

An illustration of the wildland urban interface, showing homes in the mountain foothills next to a city in a valley.
The wildland-urban interface starts on the edges of cities where homes are built closer to forests and grasslands. Courtesy of Jessy Stevenson

Climate change and wildfires

The relationship between climate and wildfire is fairly simple: Higher temperatures lead to more fire. Higher temperatures increase moisture evaporation, drying out plants and soil and making them more likely to burn. When hot, dry winds are blowing, a spark in an already dry area can quickly blow up into dangerous wildfire.

Given the rise in global temperatures that the world has already experienced, much of the western U.S. is actually in a fire deficit because of the practice of suppressing most fires. That means that, based on historical data, we should expect far more fire than weโ€™re actually seeing.

Fortunately, there are things everyone can do to break this cycle.

Why the West needs prairie dogs: Theyโ€™re among the regionโ€™s most despised species, but some tribes, researchers and landowners are racing to save them. — Christine Peterson (High Country News), Photography — Louise Johns

Prairie dogs emerge from their burrow in a colony on American Prairie in Montana. Prairie dogs, once one of the most abundant animals on the prairie, now occupy 2% of their historic range.Louise Johns/High Country News

Click the link to read the article on the High Country News website (Christine Peterson, Photography — Louise Johns:

The prairie dog caught in Trap 69 was angry. And who could blame her? After waking up in her burrow on a mid-September morning, sheโ€™d waddled innocently outside for a breakfast of mini marshmallows and carrots, only to find herself stuck in a wire cage and carried across the prairie. Then a pair of human hands had gripped her like a burrito while two more hands put a black rubber tracking collar around her neck.ย 

The situation was worse than she realized: Prairie dogs are among the most maligned and persecuted animal species in the Western U.S. So maligned, in fact, that a 2020 survey in northern Montana found that well over half the areaโ€™s landowners believed prairie dogs should not live on public land. 

To make matters even grimmer, this particular prairie dog had fleas. And those fleas could have been carrying the bacteria that causes plague โ€” the Black Death. โ€œItโ€™s not great,โ€ commented researcher Jesse Boulerice as he adjusted his gentle grip around her midsection.

The rodent responded by biting into Boulericeโ€™s leather glove, hanging on with her two front teeth while researchers swiped a black streak of Clairolโ€™s Niceโ€™n Easy hair dye down her back. 

Though black-tailed prairie dogs have a long-standing reputation as pests, their ingenious tunnel systems and industrious prairie pruning make them one of the Westโ€™s primary ecosystem engineers. Some researchers call them the โ€œchicken nuggets of the prairieโ€; if a prairie species eats meat, it almost certainly eats prairie dogs. Without prairie dogs, black-footed ferrets would never survive outside zoos and breeding facilities, and we would have far fewer mountain ploversburrowing owls, swift foxes, and ferruginous hawks

Before 1800, an estimated 5 billion prairie dogs lived from Canada to Mexico, covering the West with underground apartment complexes that shifted over the centuries like sand dunes. The Lakota, Dakota and other Indigenous peoples of the prairie shaped and depended on the ecosystems prairie dogs created. Some relied on prairie dogs for nourishment during thin times, or used them as a ceremonial food. 

But European settlers were remarkably effective at shooting and poisoning prairie dogs and plowing up their burrows. Today, the five prairie dog species occupy just 2% of their historic range, and some occupy even less. 

Prairie dogs still survive in many of their historic territories: Black-tailed prairie dogs, known for their especially large, dense colonies, persist in isolated pockets of the prairie east of the Rocky Mountains from Canada to Mexico. White-tailed prairie dogs live in parts of Montana, Wyoming, Utah and Colorado. Gunnisonโ€™s prairie dogs eke out an existence in southern Colorado, and Utah prairie dogs live in, well, Utah. Mexican prairie dogs still hang on in small slices of northern Mexico. But many of these populations are too small to serve their ecosystems as they once did.

Within this familiar story of colonization and species decline, however, are more hopeful stories of creativity and adaptation: Researchers are using pedometer-like devices to map prairie dogsโ€™ underground tunnels, remote-controlled badgers to understand prairie dog alarm calls and Kitchen-Aid mixers to craft solutions to deadly disease. After decades of restoration work by tribal wildlife managers, prairie dogs, black-footed ferrets, swift foxes and bison are once again roaming the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation in north-central Montana, one of the few places in the world where all four species coexist. Some private landowners, meanwhile, are finding ways to tolerate the rodents. Together, these researchers, managers and landowners are striving to conserve the Westโ€™s remaining prairie dogs and the prairie that depends on them. 

Jesse Boulerice, research ecologist with the Smithsonianโ€™s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, inspects a prairie dog his team trapped at American Prairie in Montana. The researchers aim to better understand prairie dog movements. Louise Johns/High Country News

ONCE THE COLLARED prairie dog was returned to her Tru Catch wire cage to await release, Boulerice reached into the next trap in line. 

Boulerice is part of a team from the Smithsonianโ€™s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute that is collaring and tracking prairie dogs at American Prairie โ€” formerly the American Prairie Reserve โ€” in central Montana. Each collar measures the animalโ€™s acceleration and angle; by triangulating with locations picked up by sensors posted on poles throughout the colony, researchers can determine where and how far the prairie dogs travel both above and below ground. The Clairol dye patterns provide one more way to tell whoโ€™s who in a colony of look-alikes. 

Though other researchers have studied prairie dogsโ€™ aboveground lives, no one really knows what they do underground. Satellite imagery can be used to track Arctic terns over Alaska or grizzly bears deep in the wilderness, but it canโ€™t penetrate the Earth. Decades ago, researchers laboriously excavated a white-tailed prairie dog burrow in southern Montana, revealing features like โ€œsleeping quarters,โ€ hibernacula, and a โ€œmaternity areaโ€ โ€” but such work is invasive and yields little data on the animalsโ€™ movements. 

At American Prairie in September, the Smithsonian team was joined by researchers from Swansea University in Wales who had developed the tracking collars Boulerice used. The collars were originally designed to study penguins underwater, an environment similarly resistant to conventional satellite tracking.  

Prairie dogs arenโ€™t the only occupants of prairie dog burrows. The mazes of tunnels and rooms also provide shelter for black-footed ferrets, swift foxes and untold numbers of insects. Burrowing owls shimmy their puffball bodies into the tunnels, where they raise their chicks on the plentiful bugs. Prairie rattlesnakes, tiger salamanders, horned lizards and badgers use them, too. 

And as climate extremes become more common aboveground, these burrows may become even more important. 

โ€œBy creating tunnels, theyโ€™re also creating a thermal refuge,โ€ said Hila Shamon, the director of the Smithsonianโ€™s Great Plains Science Program and principal investigator of the colony-mapping project. โ€œThe prairie can be so hot in the summer or brutally, brutally cold in the winter. You donโ€™t have any shade or place to hide from the cold โ€ฆ and conditions in the tunnel systems are consistent.โ€

Prairie dogs spend much of the day and all night in their burrows, living in family coteries composed of one male, three or four females and the yearโ€™s young. Their tunnel systems, which can extend across an area larger than  a football field, are like bustling apartment complexes where every family has its separate unit. Residents periodically pop out of doors to grab food, gossip about the neighbors and scan for danger. 

โ€œIn the prairie,โ€ Shamon said, โ€œthereโ€™s a whole world thatโ€™s happening beneath the ground that we canโ€™t see. But it exists, and itโ€™s very deep, and itโ€™s important.โ€

Aboveground, the effect of prairie dogs on the landscape is more obvious. โ€œPrairie dogs create an entirely novel habitat type,โ€ said Andy Boyce, a Smithsonian research ecologist. โ€œThey graze intensely. They increase the forbs and flowering plants, and they clip woody vegetation. They will eat and nibble on a new woody plant until it tips over and dies.โ€

The landscape created by prairie dogs may look barren, but the reality is more nuanced. A healthy prairie isnโ€™t an uninterrupted sea of grass; itโ€™s  made up of grass and shrubs, wetlands and wildflowers and even large patches of bare dirt that allow prairie dogs โ€” and other species โ€” to spot approaching predators. 

Bison like to wallow in the dirt exposed by prairie dogs, and graze on the nutritious grass and plants that resprout after a prairie dog pruning. Mountain plovers and thick-billed longspurs frequently nest on the grazed surface of prairie dog towns. (Both birds have declined along with prairie dogs; the mountain plover has been proposed for protection under the Endangered Species Act.) 

Prairie dog colonies may also provide other species with a home-alarm system. โ€œYou have 1,000 little pairs of eyeballs constantly searching for predators all around you and then vocalizing loudly when they see them,โ€ Boyce said. To test this hypothesis, Boyceโ€™s Ph.D. student Andrew Dreelin attached a taxidermied badger to a remote-controlled car and drove it near long-billed curlew nests in Montana prairie dog colonies. He then measured how nesting curlews responded to the badger with and without a warning from the prairie dogs. 

Results are pending, said Dreelin, but heโ€™s certain that โ€œweโ€™ve only just started to scratch the surface on the multifaceted ways that prairie dogs could shape the lives of birds on the prairie.โ€ 

A prairie dog is collared by Smithsonian scientists at American Prairie. Louise Johns/High Country News

IN EARLY OCTOBER, about 500 miles south of American Prairie, Colten Salyer also donned thick leather gloves to protect himself from an angry mammalโ€™s teeth. Then he opened a cat carrier filled with paper shavings and a member of a species once considered extinct. 

The young black-footed ferret inside bared its long white canines. Bred at the National Black-Footed Ferret Conservation Center in northern Colorado, she was one of 20 about to be reintroduced to southcentral Wyomingโ€™s Shirley Basin.

The black-footed ferret is North Americaโ€™s only native ferret and one of only three ferret species in the world. And if thereโ€™s one thing black-footed ferrets need, itโ€™s prairie dogs. They eat them almost exclusively, and they use their tunnels to live, hunt and reproduce, slipping in and out of burrows as they move like water across the landscape. 

In 1980, black-footed ferrets were declared extinct, most likely extinguished by disease, development and endless prairie dog poisoning campaigns. But in 1981, a northern Wyoming ranch dog proudly presented his owners with his most recent treasure: a dead ferret. A local taxidermist confirmed that it was, in fact, a black-footed ferret, a member of a tiny remnant population. 

The newly discovered ferrets lived in the wild until 1985, when biologists discovered that disease had killed all but 18. At that point, they scooped up the remaining ferrets and took them to captive breeding facilities. Only seven successfully reproduced, but those seven now have more than 11,000 descendants. In 2020, researchers used DNA from a wild-caught ferret with no surviving offspring to produce the first cloned ferret. Since then, they have created two more cloned individuals, and this past November, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced that one had given birth to healthy kits.

Captive-bred ferrets have now been released across the West. But to survive long-term, they need prairie dog colonies. And prairie dogs arenโ€™t popular with their human neighbors. 

Because they eat the same grass cows do. And they make holes. 

โ€œI was running to rope a yearling once, and I stood up in the saddle and was about to open my hand โ€” and all of a sudden the horseโ€™s front end disappeared,โ€ said Salyer, a ranch manager in Shirley Basin who volunteered to help with the releases. His horse had sunk a hoof into a prairie dog hole, a misstep that sent Salyer tumbling to the ground.  

Both Salyer and his horse were fine, and he shrugged after telling the story.But most ranchers have, or have heard, similar stories, many of which end with a valued horse breaking a leg. Thereโ€™s no way to know how frequently horses injure themselves in burrows, but the stories spread as fast as a prairie fire. 

Whatโ€™s certain is that prairie dogs eat grass. Quite a bit of grass: A single prairie dog can devour up to 2 pounds of green grass and non-woody plants every week, according to Montana State University. For ranchers who use that vegetation to feed their cows, prairie dogs look like competition. Researchers, however, say the effects of prairie dogs on livestock forage are mixed. Black-tailed prairie dogsโ€™ propensity to clip and mow, for instance, results in plants with higher fat and protein and lower fiber. โ€œAcross years, enhanced forage quality may help to offset reductions in forage quantity for agricultural producers,โ€ a study published in 2019 by Rangeland Ecology and Management reported.

This uncertainty has led to some bureaucratic contradictions. The Wyoming Department of Agriculture labels prairie dogs as pest species and offers training in properly using pesticides to kill them; at the same time, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department lists the black-tailed prairie dog as a species of greatest conservation need

Smithsonian ecologist Jesse Boulerice holds one of the tracking collars used to study prairie dogs at American Prairie. Louise Johns/High Country News
A collared prairie dog waits to be released. Louise Johns/High Country News
A collared prairie dog is released through a tube that researchers use to check that the sensors on the collars are working properly. Louise Johns/High Country News

Until the 1990s, said Randy Matchett, a Fish and Wildlife Service biologist in central Montana, prairie dogs were so despised in places like Phillips County, Montana, that the Bureau of Land Management produced maps of their colonies designed for sport shooters. Attitudes havenโ€™t changed much: In 2020, 27 years after an initial survey of attitudes toward black-tailed prairie dogs and black-footed ferrets in Montana, researchers found that feelings about them had barely budged

Matchett said that when he tells his Montana neighbors that only 2% of prairie dogs remain, a common attitude is: โ€œWhat the hellโ€™s the holdup getting rid of that last 2%?โ€

Chamois Andersen, a Defenders of Wildlife senior field representative, has spent decades working with landowners in prairie dog-rich places, and sheโ€™s persuaded some to allow researchers to survey their land for black-footed ferrets in exchange for funds for noxious weed removal. She speculates that younger generations of ranchers are more open to prairie dog conservation and to partnerships with public agencies and wildlife groups.

Matchett is less optimistic. Even the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service, which together manage one of the largest black-footed ferret colonies in the world in South Dakotaโ€™s Conata Basin, poison some prairie dogs on federal land to prevent the population from moving onto private property.

Not all prairie dogs are equally reviled. White-tailed prairie dogs like those in Shirley Basin live at lower densities and tend to clip plants farther up the stems, making them less obvious to the casual observer. Landowners, as a result, are often more tolerant of them than their black-tailed cousins, said Andrew Gygli, a small-carnivore biologist for Wyoming Game and Fish. 

Bob Heward, whose family started ranching in Shirley Basin more than a century ago, understands that a disliked species can also be useful. 

He invites recreational shooters to target prairie dogs on his land, but he wonโ€™t use poison to kill the rodents because he knows they provide food for other species. Prairie dogs are a โ€œnuisance,โ€ he said, but theyโ€™re also as inevitable as the wind: โ€œWeโ€™ve learned to live with them. Theyโ€™ve been here longer than I have.โ€

THE MALE SWIFT FOX at the end of the trap line was chunky, at least by swift fox standards: Though he weighed only about 5 pounds, his belly was round beneath his fluffy fur. His black eyes carefully followed Smithsonian researcher Hila Shamon as she loaded him into the backseat of her four-door pickup, covering the trap with a blanket as she prepared to transport him from this ranch north of Laramie, Wyoming, to a new home on the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation in Montana. 

Unlike black-footed ferrets, swift foxes can survive without prairie dogs, but when prairie dogs are scarce they suffer from the loss of food, Shamon said, and are deprived of the shelter they find in prairie dog burrows. So they, too, declined as prairie dogs were exterminated and prairie habitat was converted into cropland. By the early 1900s, they had disappeared from Canada, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma. 

But swift foxes still live in parts of the West โ€” and in some places, their populations are being restored. For the last five years, Shamon and her team have trapped swift foxes in Wyoming and Colorado and trucked them to Fort Belknap. This rectangle of grassland, buttes and prairie breaks near the Canadian border is home to the Nakoda (Assiniboine) and Aโ€™aninin (Gros Ventre), both Great Plains peoples. Today, it is one of the only places in the world where prairie dogs, swift foxes, black-footed ferrets and bison co-exist. 

Montana State Sen. Mike Fox (Gros Ventre), D, who served as Fort Belknapโ€™s director of Fish and Wildlife from 1991 to 2001, oversaw early efforts to restore buffalo, swift foxes and black-footed ferrets to the reservation. The goal was to โ€œcreate a steady, healthy population of native animals that were driven to extinction because of the different uses of the land,โ€ he said. โ€œLike when they started poisoning the prairie dogs off in the โ€™30s and โ€™40s and wiped out the ferrets that were native here, and the same with the swift fox. We want to make as complete an ecosystem as we can, along with the buffalo.โ€

The tribes worked with the Fish and Wildlife Service to reintroduce black-footed ferrets, and, with researchers at the Smithsonian, World Wildlife Fund and other organizations, to bring back the swift fox. The collaborators spent two years planning the swift fox capture and translocation, Shamon said, considering factors like habitat quality, community attitudes and the overall risk to a re-established population. 

Swift foxes had already been reintroduced in parts of Alberta and Saskatchewan and on the Blackfeet and Fort Peck reservations. The reintroduction at Fort Belknap continued the tribesโ€™ restoration efforts and added a possible point of connectivity for other populations. 

A Smithsonian researcher inspects a prairie dog her team trapped at American Prairie, a nature reserve in north-central Montana. Louise Johns/High Country News

Tribal members living on and near the Fort Belknap Reservation have largely supported the reintroduction of native prairie species, especially after prairie dog numbers were diminished by an outbreak of disease in the late โ€™90s, Fox said. Now that the population is recovering and has started to clear larger areas of grass, however, some tribal members who raise cattle have begun expressing frustration to the tribal council. 

โ€œWildlife and cattle will graze prairie dog colonies because of the new growth coming back throughout the year,โ€ said Fox. โ€œIt makes it look even worse because itโ€™s attractive to wildlife and domestic cattle, and they do their part. When it starts looking like a moonscape is when we get people noticing the most.โ€

He tells people that the little grass-eating rodents are necessary, and notes that the โ€œmoonscapesโ€ arenโ€™t as widespread as they may seem. But like non-Native ranchers across the West, some tribal members equate abundant prairie dogs with fewer cows. Fox doesnโ€™t believe the council will allow widespread prairie dog poisoning on tribal lands โ€” especially since the reservation now hosts black-footed ferrets โ€” but he does worry that opposition could intensify.

Bronc Speak Thunder (Assiniboine), director of the Fort Belknap Buffalo Program, has also heard people complain about prairie dogs, though he added that โ€œpeople complain about a lot of stuff.โ€

The tribes arenโ€™t actively restoring prairie dogs, he said; theyโ€™re simply refraining from poisoning and shooting them. He sees that prairie dogs benefit tribal land by creating more habitat for ground-nesting birds and serving as food for swift foxes, coyotes, hawks and eagles. They also encourage the growth of nutritious grass for bison. โ€œLike life, itโ€™s a big circle, and thatโ€™s where it fits,โ€ he said. โ€œTheyโ€™re part of the ecosystem that exists, and if you take something out, it throws everything off.โ€

Jessica Alexander, wildlife biologist with the Smithsonian, releases a swift fox into the wild on the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation. Louise Johns/High Country News

WHEN I MET Randy Matchett, the Fish and Wildlife Service biologist, he sported a cowboy hat and graying horseshoe mustache and carried a handful of Smurf-blue flea-control pellets, each slightly smaller than a marble. The pellets, which Matchett produced in his workshop at the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Lewistown, Montana, are his latest attempt to protect prairie dogs from a fatal disease.

The pellets contain Fipronil, an insecticide used in treatments likeFrontline to keep fleas and ticks away from household pets, and are flavored with peanut butter and molasses to increase their chances of ending up in prairie dog bellies. Matchett dyes them blue because research shows prairie dogs are attracted to the color, and because the dye stains their feces, making it easy to estimate how many animals have consumed the pellets. Once ingested, Matchett hopes, his โ€œFipBitsโ€ will kill the fleas that land on and bite prairie dogs, including the fleas carrying the bacteria that causes plague. 

Yes, that plague. The bacte-ria Yersinia pestis causes bubonic plague, which became known as the Black Death after it killed at least 25 million Europeans during the 14th century.

In 1900, the disease arrived in North America via San Francisco, carried by rats stowed away on ships. During the following decades, the development of antibiotics controlled the disease in humans, but plague continued to spread among rodent species, affecting black-footed ferrets, rabbits and squirrels. First detected in prairie dogs in 1936, it devastated populations already hit hard by the conversion of the prairie to agriculture โ€” and it remains a major threat to prairie dogs.

โ€œOnce colonies have plague, they can disappear in two weeks,โ€ said Shamon. โ€œThere will be thousands of acres chirping with thousands or tens of thousands of animals and in two weeks, you will go map it, and theyโ€™re gone.โ€

A plague vaccine does exist, and is used to protect highly endangered species like black-footed ferrets. But itโ€™s simply not possible to jab every prairie dog in the West. Matchett, who as a Fish and Wildlife biologist is responsible for conserving endangered species, got involved in plague prevention in the early 1990s, initially dusting prairie dog colonies for fleas. In 2013, he began testing oral vaccines in Montana colonies, working in parallel with researchers in seven other states. The first-generation vaccines were red, peanut-butter flavored cubes with a biomarker that tinted prairie dog whiskers pink. Matchett and his colleagues in Colorado also developed vaccine pellets that they mass-produced using a Lithuanian carp bait-making machine. Matchett helped craft a pellet shooter that could be bolted to the front of a four-wheeler.

With the new vaccines primed to launch, Matchett felt hopeful. The World Wildlife Fund, which helped fund some of the work, felt hopeful, too. But in 2018, after years of trials with thousands of prairie dogs, he and other researchers concluded that even when a colony was given oral vaccinations, the number of prairie dogs that survived a plague outbreak was too small to support a black-footed ferret population. 

So Matchett pivoted. If he couldnโ€™t inoculate prairie dogs against plague, maybe he could kill the fleas that carried the bacteria. What if he could persuade prairie dogs to eat Fipronil? 

He made a new set of pellets with the same bait machine, this time using his wifeโ€™s grandmotherโ€™s Kitchen-Aid mixer to blend various types of flour, vital wheat gluten, peanut butter, molasses and other food-grade ingredients with a soupรงon of flea killer. Early results have been promising: While adult fleas arenโ€™t affected until they bite a prairie dog thatโ€™s ingested a pellet, not every flea needs to be killed; studies have shown that in general, fleas donโ€™t trigger plague outbreaks until they reach a critical mass. And flea larvae appear to die when they crawl into or consume treated prairie dog poop, suggesting that the pellets could tamp down flea reproduction as well as kill the adult insects. 

FipBits arenโ€™t the only way to reduce the toll plague takes on prairie dogs, but Matchett believes theyโ€™re the most likely to work. In his office, perched on stacks of files, are the remnants of another of his many assaults on the problem: dozens of vials of alcohol, each containing bits of prairie dog ears. In 2007 and 2008, Matchett and his colleagues collected the snippets from prairie dogs that had survived plague outbreaks, hoping genetic analysis would explain their fortitude. The material has yet to be analyzed owing to a โ€œcombination of lack of funding, interest, time and capability,โ€ Matchett said, but he hopes new funding will allow him and his collaborators to return to the project.

Despite the setbacks, Matchett believes researchers can find a way to control plague in prairie dogs. Human intolerance, as he sees it, is a more stubborn problem. Places like Fort Belknap and the Conata Basin of South Dakota โ€” where prairie dogs are, at least for now, allowed to flourish โ€” remain few and far between. 

At his shop in Lewistown, Montana, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist Randy Matchett holds the flea-control pellets he hopes will help reduce the toll plague takes on prairie dogs. Louise Johns/High Country News
Matchett tests the pellet shooter he helped create (left to right). Louise Johns/High Country News

DRIVE SOUTH from Fort Belknap down Highway 191, head east on a straight gravel road, and youโ€™ll find one more place where prairie dogs are left in peace.

American Prairie began in 2001 as an effort to protect and restore Montanaโ€™s grasslands. The nonprofit now manages more than 527,000 acres of private land and federal and state leases. Its ultimate goal is to connect 3.2 million acres of prairie, providing habitat for an array of species from bison to mountain plovers to black-footed ferrets. To the casual observer, American Prairieโ€™s lands may already look like intact prairie, though ecologists like Daniel Kinka canโ€™t help noticing the nonnative crested wheatgrass and the hundreds of miles of fencing. 

โ€œThis is kind of like the Field of Dreams model: If you build it, they will come,โ€ said Kinka, American Prairieโ€™s director of rewilding. โ€œA better habitat houses more wildlife, and the wildlife that are here are perfectly capable of restoring themselves.โ€

American Prairie prohibits the poisoning and shooting of prairie dogs on its land, and it regularly hosts research projects such as the Smithsonianโ€™s burrow mapping โ€” which may help explain how plague spreads within colonies โ€” and Matchettโ€™s tests of plague-mitigation tools. Prairie dogs, said Kinka, are the โ€œunsung heroes of a prairie ecosystem,โ€ important to all the other species American Prairie is trying to foster. And as researchers have found, the woody plants that prairie dogs chew down to clear their line of sight tend to be replaced by nutritious grasses and wildflowers, suggesting that even cattle may benefit from their presence. 

The possibility that prairie dogs could be good for cattle, or at least not as bad as generally believed, is met with skepticism by American Prairieโ€™s neighbors, many of whom see the nonprofit as a threat to ranching. Signs posted along highways in Phillips County, Montana, read โ€œSave the American Cowboy. Stop American Prairie Reserve.โ€ For now, Kinka isnโ€™t trying to convince anyone to like or even appreciate prairie dogs, aiming instead for tolerance.

The black-tailed prairie dog complex studied by the Smithsonian team at American Prairie is a noisy place, filled with the barks and trills of hundreds of creatures. As I stood beside researcher Jesse Boulerice, listening, it was easy to imagine that the rodents were doing just fine. But theyโ€™re not. Will they ever be allowed to exist in numbers like this throughout their historic range?

Boulerice surveyed the surface of the colony, which was covered with dried plant nubs and bare mounds of dirt, and said he wasnโ€™t sure. 

Then he released a collared prairie dog who wagged her chubby butt in the air as she scurried into a nearby hole. She promptly popped back up, chirping out a message weโ€™ll never understand. Perhaps she was warning her colony-mates to watch out for those marshmallows and carrots; they hide a nasty trap.

Or maybe she was scolding us โ€” telling us exactly what she thought of our species before she disappeared into her burrow, leaving us to decide the future of hers.   

Prairie dogs emerge from their burrows at American Prairie. Louise Johns/High Country News

This story is part of High Country Newsโ€™ Conservation Beyond Boundaries project, which is supported by the BAND Foundation.

We welcome reader letters. Email High Country News at editor@hcn.org or submit a letter to the editor. See our letters to the editor policy.

This article appeared in the January 2025 print edition of the magazine with the headline โ€œThe prairie dog conundrum.โ€

Colorado Secures $177 Million in Federal Funding for Water Projects — #Colorado Water Conservation Board

View of Shoshone Hydroelectric Plant construction in Glenwood Canyon (Garfield County) Colorado; shows the Colorado River, the dam, sheds, a footbridge, and the workmen’s camp. Creator: McClure, Louis Charles, 1867-1957. Credit: Denver Public Library Digital Collections

Click the link to read the release on the Colorado Water Conservation Board website:

January 17, 2025โ€”The Bureau of Reclamation announced this week nearly $177 million in funding for water projects in the Upper Rio Grande and Upper Colorado River basins in Colorado. These fundsโ€”awarded from Bucket 2 Environmental Drought Mitigation (B2E) and Inflation Reduction Act programsโ€”will help Colorado better address the impacts to our water supplies and aquatic ecosystems from a hotter, drier future. The Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) shares the excitement of all the organizations receiving fundingโ€”the awards are a testament to their hard work. The CWCB is proud to have supported several of the awardees with matching funds and technical assistance while developing their applications.

โ€œWe are thrilled to see this funding go towards these critical projects in Colorado. We are particularly proud to have played a role in assisting these projects in securing funding through CWCBโ€™s grant programs including our Federal Technical Assistance Grant Program, Projects Bill Grants Program and Wildfire Ready Watershed Grants Program,โ€ said Lauren Ris, CWCB Director. โ€œBy building upon the capacity of our local partners, we provide resources and guidance to navigate complex federal funding processes.โ€

The funded projects span a diverse range of initiatives that deliver impactful outcomes for Colorado communities. CWCB funding supported applications for:

  • Upper Rio Grande Basin Drought Resiliency Activities: CWCB provided a $195,000 Local Capacity Grant to the Rio Grande Headwaters Restoration Foundation, which helped secure aย $24.9 million IRA award through the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s โ€œOther Basinsโ€ Program. These projects are essential to addressing the long-term drought and water security in the basin.ย 
  • Addressing Drought Mitigation in Southwest Colorado: CWCB provided a $156,706 Local Capacity Grant to the San Juan Resource Conservation and Development Council (in partnership with Southwestern Water Conservation District) which helped secure up to $25.6 million in B2E funding to enhance drought resilience and habitat restoration efforts in southwest Colorado.
  • Orchard Mesa Irrigation District Conveyance Upgrades for 15-Mile Reach Flow Enhancement:ย CWCB provided a $73,250 Local Capacity Grant to Farmers Conservation Alliance (in partnership with Orchard Mesa Irrigation District) which helped secure up to $10.5 million in B2E funding to modernize irrigation systems and improve water efficiency.
  • Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project:ย CWCB provided a $20 million Projects Bill Grant to the Colorado River Water Conservation District which helped secure up toย $40 million in B2E funding to acquire the Shoshone water right.ย 
  • Drought Resiliency on Western Colorado Conserved Lands:ย CWCB provided a $434,130 Local Capacity Grant to the Colorado River Water Conservation District (in partnership with Shavano Conservation District) which helped secure up to $4.6 million in B2E funding to address drought challenges in western Colorado.
  • Forest Resiliency in the Headwaters of the Colorado: CWCB provided a $93,850 Wildfire Ready Watersheds Grant to Grand County which supported the development of the โ€œGrand County Wildfire Ready Action Plan,โ€ which helped secure up to $32.6 million in multistate B2E funding for wildfire mitigation efforts.

CWCB is committed to continuing to be a partner of communities statewide so that they are best positioned to secure federal funding and implement lasting solutions for Colorado water challenges. The 2024 Federal Technical Assistance Grant cycle is completed, and more information about 2025 applications will be announced this Spring. 

Biden-Harris Administration announces new Colorado River Environmental Funding Totaling over $388.3 Million

Ducks taking flight from the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam. Reclamation photo by Pablo Mena.

Click the link to read the release on the Reclamation website:

January 17, 2025

WASHINGTON โ€” The Bureau of Reclamation today announced initial selections under the Upper Colorado River Basin Environmental Program for a $388.3 million investment from President Bidenโ€™s Investing in America agenda to improve wildlife and aquatic habitats, ecological stability and resilience against drought. The funding supports 42 projects in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, as well as Tribal initiatives that will provide environmental benefits or the restoration of ecosystem and natural habitats. To view a full list of projects, visit Reclamationโ€™s website. Individualized criteria for some projects are included in the descriptions at the link. 

Additionally, Reclamation announced approximately $100 Million funding opportunity for the companion program in the Lower Basin, which seeks to fund projects that provide environmental benefits in Arizona, Nevada, and California. 

โ€œThese historic environmental investments will restore and improve natural resources supporting the long-term sustainability of the Colorado River Basin, which includes nine National Parks across the seven states and is an essential habitat for more than a dozen endangered species,โ€ Commissioner Camille Calimlim Touton said.  โ€œAs we continue to develop the drought resiliency of the basin through investments in water conservation and efficiency projects, we canโ€™t forget that a sustainable basin can only exist if there is a healthy environment.โ€

 This is the first round of projects funded from the Upper Basin Environmental Drought Mitigation Program through the Inflation Reduction Act. More announcements are expected in the coming months, including projects from the most recent Upper Basin environmental announcement, which closed Jan. 10, 2025. Reclamation will begin negotiations with successful applicants to ensure funding conditions are met before funding is obligated. Funding for the Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project will not be obligated until the Colorado water court enters a final decree; in addition, the agreement will contain provisions requiring Reclamationโ€™s written consent for any water right changes. The conditions precedent set by the State of Colorado for their funding of the Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project must also be met prior to the obligation of federal funds. Funding for the Pine River Environment Drought Mitigation Project is subject to negotiation concerning operation, maintenance and replacement costs and other appropriate considerations. 

Reclamationโ€™s new funding opportunity for proposed ecosystem restoration or improvements projects in the Lower Colorado River Basin is also funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, and will consider projects that provide environmental benefits, or ecosystem and habitat restoration projects that address issues directly caused by drought in the Lower Colorado Basin Region under Phase 3 of the Lower Colorado River Basin System Conservation and Efficiency Program. Reclamation expects to announce projects by spring 2025 and award approximately $100 million for planning, design, construction, and/or implementation of projects. Project and applicant eligibility information is available on the Bureau of Reclamation website

The Biden-Harris administration has led a comprehensive effort to make Western communities more resilient to climate change and address the ongoing megadrought across the region by harnessing the full resources of President Bidenโ€™s historic Investing in America agenda. As climate change has accelerated over the past two decades, the Colorado River Basin experienced the driest period in over one thousand years. Together, the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provide the largest investment in climate resilience in our nationโ€™s history, including $15.4 billion for Western water across federal agencies to enhance the Westโ€™s resilience to drought and deliver unprecedented resources to protect the Colorado River System for all whose lives and livelihoods depend on it. This includes $5.35 billion for over 577 projects in the Colorado River Basin states.ย 


Projects in Colorado

Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project: Up to approximately $40m

Funding is provided to permanently protect the Shoshone Water Rights in the Upper Colorado River Basin to ensure a reliable water supply for ecosystem, agricultural, municipal, and recreational uses. Key components include maintaining the historical flow regime, eliminating risks of abandonment due to plant decommissioning, and facilitating instream flow use by the Colorado Water Conservation Board. Funds will not be obligated or expended until a final Colorado water court decree is entered confirming water rights and the agreement will contain provisions requiring written consent of Reclamation on any water right changes. The conditions precedent set by the State of Colorado for their funding of the Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project must also be met prior to the obligation of federal funds.

Addressing Drought Mitigation in Southwest Colorado: Up to approximately $25.6m

Funding is provided for restoring ecosystems and improving river and connection of waterways in southwestern Colorado. It involves a collaborative effort to enhance biodiversity and water resources while supporting local communities and endangered species.

Grand Mesa and Upper Gunnison Watershed Resiliency and Aquatic Connectivity Project: Up to approximately $24.3m

Funding is provided to implement watershed restoration actions to combat drought effects in western Colorado. Through a variety of strategies, it enhances water quality, habitat resilience, and connectivity for aquatic species.

Orchard Mesa Irrigation District Conveyance Upgrades for 15-Mile Reach Flow Enhancement: Up to approximately $10.5m

Funding is provided to convert open canals into pressurized pipelines, improving water delivery efficiency and reducing environmental stressors. This upgrade supports the recovery of endangered fish species by enhancing streamflow in the critical 15-mile reach of the Colorado River.

Enhancing Aquatic Habitat in Colorado River Headwaters: Up to approximately $7m

Funding is provided to restore stream habitats along the Fraser, Blue and Colorado rivers in Grand County, enhancing aquatic ecosystems through channel shaping and bank stabilization through collaboration with key conservation partners.

Yampa River/Walton Creek Confluence Restoration Project: Up to approximately $5m

Funding is provided to restore river and wetland ecosystems in Steamboat Springs through restoration of river and floodplain habitat and the rehabilitation of riparian and wetland area thereby enhancing ecological health and promoting biodiversity. It addresses drought impacts by improving water quality, habitat complexity, and community resilience.

Drought Resiliency on Western Colorado Conserved Lands: Up to approximately $4.6m

Funding is provided to implement various ecological restoration strategies, including the restoration of wetlands, reconnection of floodplains, the installation of erosion control structures to reduce sediment transport and enhance water quality, while promoting habitat restoration for at-risk species like the yellow-billed cuckoo and Gunnison sage-grouse.

Upper Colorado Basin Aquatic Organism Passage Program: Up to approximately $4.2m

Funding is provided to restore stream habitat in Grand County, promoting biodiversity and resilience against drought conditions while enhancing habitat connectivity and improving fish passage for native species, particularly Colorado River cutthroat trout.

Conversion of Wastewater Lagoons into Wetlands: Up to approximately $3m

Funding is provided to transform outdated sewer lagoons into wetlands, enhancing biodiversity and providing habitat for migratory waterfowl and endangered fish species in the town of [Palisade]. Once completed, the wetlands will improve water quality and increase native plant diversity, recharging groundwater and supporting up to 75% of commercially harvested fish.

Fruita Reservoir Dam Removal: Up to approximately $2.8m

Funding is provided to remove a dam on Pinon Mesa, restoring wetlands and enhancing biodiversity and wildlife habitat while ensuring ecological resilience through water pooling, pipeline removal and comprehensive habitat restoration efforts.

Monitoring and Quantifying the Effectiveness of Beaver Dam Analogs on Drought Influenced Streams in the Upper Colorado River Basin: Up to approximately $1.9m

Funding is provided to restore degraded headwater meadows by implementing structures that mimic the natural functions of beaver dams. These interventions enhance ecosystem resilience, improve water retention, and support native species.

Uncompahgre Tailwater Rehabilitation Project: Up to $1.8m

Funding is provided to address habitat degradation, enhancing ecological health and recreational opportunities through rehabilitation of river habitat, restoration aging structures, and implementation of bank stabilization techniques.

Eagle River Habitat Improvement, Gypsum Ponds State Wildlife Area: Up to approximately $1.5m

Funding is provided to enhance Eagle River in Eagle County, improving fish habitat and increasing resilience to low flows and drought while supporting local ecosystems and enhancing water quality.

Orchard Mesa and Grand Valley Metering Efficiency Project: Up to approximately $1.5m

Funding is provided to enhance water management in the Grand Valley through the installation of advanced metering technology and SCADA systems. This project addresses drought conditions by improving water use efficiency and supporting local aquatic ecosystems.

Habitat Restoration in the Gunnison Basin: Up to approximately $750k

Funding is provided to restore stream habitats in the Gunnison Basin, implementing low-tech restoration structures to enhance ecosystem resilience and support habitat for the endangered Gunnison Sage-Grouse.

Cyanobacteria Monitoring and Treatment for Drought-driven Blooms in a High Elevation, Upper Colorado Reservoir to save Ecosystem Function: Up to approximately $518k

Funding is provided to restore aquatic health at Williams Fork reservoir by deploying real-time water quality monitoring tools and implementing targeted hydrogen peroxide treatments to combat algal blooms. It enhances water quality management to protect ecosystems and support community recreational activities.

Another blast of Arctic air: this time, with a stretched but strong polar vortex — NOAA

Click the link to read the article on the NOAA website (Amy Butler and Laura Ciasto):

January 16, 2025

Weโ€™re briefly popping in because another surge of very cold air looks to drop down from the Arctic over a large region of the central US this weekend and into early next week. We know that the question will be asked: is the cold related to the polar vortex this time? So here we are to provide some answers.

There are two points we want to emphasize:

1. The polar vortex strength, as measured by the speed of the winds around the 60N latitude circle and 10 hPa pressure level, remains stronger than average, and is currently forecast by most models to return to near-record strong wind speeds into early February.

Observed and forecasted (NOAA GEFSv12) wind speed in the polar vortex compared to the natural range of variability (faint blue shading). Since mid-November, the winds at 60 degrees North (the mean location of the polar vortex) have been stronger than normal. According to the GEFSv12 forecast issued on January 15 2025, those winds are forecast to remain stronger than normal for at least the next few weeks (bold red line). NOAA Climate.gov image, adapted from original by Laura Ciasto.

Normally, if the polar vortex is communicating with the surface, which it finally has been in the last couple of days, a strong polar vortex would be associated with persistent warmth over much of Europe, Asia, and the eastern US. (A strong polar vortex is usually associated with a northward shifted jet stream that keeps the coldest air corralled over the pole.) Europe and Asia are indeed anticipating warmer than average conditions next week, but not the US. So something else is going on over the US that is overwhelming the โ€œstrong polar vortexโ€ signal.

2. We discussed how we didnโ€™t think the shape or stretching of the polar vortex contributed to the last cold air outbreak, because in the lower stratosphere the vortex was shifted towards Asia and not stretched over North America. However, in this case, the vortex is actually forecast to stretch throughout its entire depth (10-30 miles above the surface) over Canada and the Hudson Bay. So unlike last week, this time the stretched out polar vortex may be associated with the forecasted southward shift of the jet stream, which allows the troposphereโ€™s cold Arctic air to spill into the continental US.

The forecasted structure of the tropospheric jet stream (yellow) and several levels of the stratospheric polar vortex from the lower stratosphere to the upper stratosphere in the NOAA GFS model for 17 January 2025 (initialized on 16 January 2025). The contours show how the stretched polar vortex corresponds to the southward shift of the jet stream over North America. NOAA Climate.gov image, adapted from original by Laura Ciasto.

However, we want to reemphasize that โ€œassociated withโ€ still does not mean one thing caused another, and in this case, itโ€™s still difficult to understand what is causing what. Additionally, a strong ridge of high pressure has been building up simultaneously near Alaska, which can also help force the jet stream to dive down south over the continental US and bring cold Arctic air with it, independent of the polar vortex.

Downstream of a “ridge” over Alaska, the jet stream (the winds at the 250-millibar pressure level) is forecasted to make a deep dip (known as a “trough” to meteorologists) into the United States over the weekend of January 18, 2025, according to NOAA’s Global Forecast System. NOAA Climate.gov animation based on a screen recording from theย Earth Null School website.

To sum up: Unlike last time (Jan 5-7), the stretching of the polar vortex is extending through the entire column and is โ€œin-syncโ€ with the extension of the jet. But we donโ€™t know the directionality (what caused what), and other tropospheric factors like the strong Alaskan ridging are definitely big players. And while things are more in-line this time, cold air outbreaks donโ€™t only happen because of the polar vortex.

#Colorado in 2024: fourth warmest year on record: Just 2 all-time lows compared to 120 all-time highs — Allen Best (BigPivots.com) #ActOnClimate

Click the link to read the article on the Big Pivots website (Allen Best):

January 11, 2025

It was another warm year in Colorado, part of a theme. Russ Schumacher, the state climatologist, reports 2024 was the 4th warmest on record, 3 degrees warmer than the 20th century average when temperatures across the state were averaged for the year.

Eight of the 10 warmest years in Coloradoโ€™s recorded history have been since 2012.

From his base in Akron, 115 miles northeast of Denver, Joel Schneekloth observed temperatures that fit in with this trend.

โ€œWe really had warm days but even warmer nights,โ€ reported Schneekloth, who is a regional water specialist with the Colorado Water Institute. โ€œBut we didnโ€™t have a string of 100 degree days like we had in 2012 and 2002. We had 100 just once or twice this year.โ€

To be clear, it can still get cold in Colorado. This is not quite up to Lake Wobegon standards, where all the children are above average. But all the action has been on the high side of the thermometer โ€” or on the lack of cold.. That was particularly true in December.

The Colorado Climate Center reported 120 new all-time high temperatures along with 25 tied records. Nights, as Schneekloth noted, were also warm. There were 129 records for the high minimum temperature.

On the flip side, it had two all-time cold temperatures.

Notable was the warmth of December. โ€œIt was very warm across Colorado, or perhaps more accurately, there was a distinct lack of cold,โ€ Schumacher wrote.

โ€œIt really was the lack of any real cold in December that led to the record-breaking temperatures for the month,โ€ he told Big Pivots.

โ€œHighs in the low 70s arenโ€™t especially remarkable in December, but many stations set records for the warmest low temperature for December. For example, at Sedgwick, the lowest temperature in December was 11F โ€“ the previous warmest low temperature for December was 9F. This is true at numerous stations in northeastern Colorado. Fort Collins only got down to 15 in December. The previous record  was 12 Akron only got to 10; the previous record was 8.โ€

At many stations, the second or third warmest low for December was just the previous year (2023), a December with a similar lack of cold.

Precipitation, on the other hand, was above average statewide but not abnormally so, 35th wettest in records across the past 130 years. The story of rain and snow, however, was not uniform. The southern San Luis Valley had its wettest calendar year on record. Lands north of Fort Collins and Greeley, along the Wyoming border, much drier than average.

Congressional delays cause uncertainty for water conservation program: Upper #Colorado River Commission not yet accepting applications for System Conservation in 2025 — Heather Sackett (AspenJournalism.org) #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification #CRWUA2024

These hay bales stand ready to be collected on a ranch outside of Carbondale in July 2024. A program that pays irrigators in the Upper Colorado River Basin to cut back is facing uncertainty in 2025 because of Congressional delays.ย Credit:ย Heather Sackett/Aspen Journalism

Click the link to read the article on the Aspen Journalism website (Heather Sackett):

January 11, 2025

A federally funded water conservation program in the Upper Colorado River Basin is facing uncertainty for 2025 after the bill to authorize funding for it stalled in Congress late last year.

On Friday, Upper Colorado River Commission Executive Director Chuck Cullom said the commission planned to communicate to participants in the 2024 System Conservation Pilot Program that the UCRC is not accepting applications at this time for a 2025 program. Officials will let people know later this month if and when the application process will open for 2025. 

According to a post on the UCRCโ€™s website, which has since been removed, applications were potentially going to be available Jan. 9, with a now-cancelled informational webinar scheduled for Jan. 10. 

Officials are holding out hope that the program can still get federal authorization in time for water users โ€” mostly farmers and ranchers โ€” in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming to conserve water during the upcoming growing season. 

โ€œThe commission recognizes that SCPP has been an important and useful tool for the Upper Basin to understand the opportunities and issues that conservation programs represent,โ€ Cullom said. โ€œWe are hopeful we will have that tool available in 2025 and again in 2026.โ€

The System Conservation Pilot Program, which pays water users who volunteer to cut back, was restarted in 2023 as part of the Upper Basinโ€™s 5-Point Plan, designed to protect critical infrastructure from plummeting reservoir levels. Over two years, the program spent about $45 million to save about 101,000 acre-feet of water. Funding for SCPP comes from $125 million allocated through the Inflation Reduction Act.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s authorization to spend this money expired in December and now must be renewed if the program is to continue.

Anthony Rivera-Rodriguez, a press secretary with the office of U.S. Sen. John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., said lawmakers plan to introduce a new bill for funding authorization in the next couple of weeks. He said funding for Western drought programs has not been controversial and has received bipartisan support. The authorization didnโ€™t pass in December, he said, because lawmakers simply ran out of time before the end of the session. The Colorado Sun reported last month that the Senate passed the Colorado River Basin System Conservation Extension Act, but the House of Representatives โ€œleft it on the chopping block as lawmakers raced to pass legislation to avoid a government shutdown.โ€

โ€œWe are trying to get this authorized as soon as we possibly can,โ€ Rivera-Rodriguez said.

SCPP has been dogged by controversy since it was rebooted in 2023. The program originally took place from 2015 to 2018. 

SCPP has been criticized for aย lack of transparencyย in the 2023 program, not measuring and tracking how much of the conserved water eventually makes it to Lake Powell, and for its potential negative impacts, in general, to the agricultural communities of the Western Slope and, in particular, to anย irrigation company in the Grand Valley. In response to the second criticism, officials are working on how Upper Basin states could โ€œget creditโ€ for conserved water through aย memorandum of understandingย with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

Delta County farmer Paul Kehmeier kneels by gated pipes in his familyโ€™s alfalfa field. Kehmeier participated in the 2024 System Conservation Pilot Program and said he would again in 2025 if funding is reauthorized by Congress. Credit: Natalie Keltner-McNeil/Aspen Journalism

Whether reauthorization will come quickly enough for Upper Basin agricultural producers to participate in the upcoming irrigation season remains to be seen. Short notice and a hasty rollout of SCPP for the 2023 growing season meant low participation numbers for that year, with just 66 water-saving projects and about 38,000 acre-feet conserved across the four Upper Basin states. The number of projects in 2024 jumped to 109, with about 64,000 acre-feet conserved.

A last-minute reprieve for the program wouldnโ€™t be a problem for one Delta County rancher who participated in SCPP in 2024. Paul Kehmeier enrolled 58 acres of his ranch in the program last year and said he plans to participate again if the program is extended. 

โ€œThere are two reasons that Iโ€™m planning to participate,โ€ Kehmeier said. โ€œOne is that the money is very good, and second is that I donโ€™t think we in the Upper Basin can stick our heads in the sand on all this big river stuff. โ€ฆ My irrigation season starts April 1, so anytime up until the last day of March, if I had a chance to participate, I would jump at the chance.โ€

The reauthorization of System Conservation comes at a pivotal moment for water users on the Colorado River. Negotiations between the Upper Basin states and the Lower Basin states (California, Arizona, Nevada) on how shortages will be shared after 2026 have ground to a halt. Lower Basin water managers say all seven states that use the Colorado River must share cuts under the driest conditions, while Upper Basin officials maintain they already take cuts in dry years because they are squeezed by climate change and canโ€™t rely on the massive storage buckets of Lake Powell and Lake Mead for their water supply. Upper Basin leaders also maintain that they shouldnโ€™t have to share additional cuts because their states have never used the entire 7.5 million-acre-foot apportionment given to them by the Colorado River Compact, while the Lower Basin regularly uses its full allotment.

But there has been a recognition in recent months by some Upper Basin officials that their states will have to participate in some kind of future conservation program โ€” SCPP or otherwise โ€” on a river whose flows have declined over the past two decades due to drought and climate change. 

โ€œAs we get more familiar with this, maybe that can be ramped up to 100,000, 200,000 (acre-feet), I donโ€™t know,โ€ Esteban Lopez, the UCRC commissioner from New Mexico, told attendees at the December Colorado River Water Users Association Conference in Las Vegas. โ€œMaybe we can get there, maybe we canโ€™t. But the point is: We will conserve and we will commit to conserve what we can conserve when thereโ€™s water available and put it in an account in Lake Powell.โ€

This story ran in the Jan. 12 edition of The Aspen Times and SkyHi News.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

U.S. Representative Joe Neguse Announces $2.4 Million in Infrastructure Funding for Water Resiliency & Restoration Projects in Grand and Boulder Counties

Colorado Rivers. Credit: Geology.com

January 10, 2025

Lafayette, CO โ€” Today, House Assistant Minority Leader Joe Neguse, Co-Chair of the Colorado River Caucus, announced $2.4 million from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for two projects in Coloradoโ€™s 2nd District aimed at restoring and improving the ecological conditions of local waterways and aquatic habitat near the communities of Granby and Boulder. These investments were allocated by the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s WaterSMART Environmental Water Resources Projects program.

โ€œLocal communities are instrumental in protecting and restoring Coloradoโ€™s rivers and streams. This important funding will support locally driven projects that enhance watershed health and resiliency, restore ecological conditions, and embody the spirit of ecological stewardship,โ€ said Assistant Leader Neguse. 

โ€œColorado is focused on protecting our vital water sources so that there is plenty of clean water for our communities and environment. I applaud Rep. Neguse’s leadership in Congress to pass federal legislation that is delivering for Colorado, and thank our State agencies and Coloradans carrying out these important projects,โ€ said Governor Jared Polis.

Projects in Coloradoโ€™s 2nd Congressional District include the Upper Colorado River Ecosystem Enhancement Project, managed by the Grand County Learning By Doing Cooperative Effort (LBD), and the Boulder Creek Headwaters Resiliency Project, led by the Boulder Watershed Collective. Additional information on both can be found HERE and below: 

  • $1,425,859ย for the Upper Colorado River Ecosystem Enhancement Project, to restore two stream reaches on the Fraser River and Willow Creek near the community of Granby.ย 
  • $954,204ย for the Boulder Creek Headwaters Resiliency Project, to restore and improve the ecological condition of 181 acres of degraded aquatic and riparian habitat, and 2.8 miles of wet meadow streams throughout the Boulder Creek Watershed near Boulder.ย 

โ€œThis is just another great example of the successful collaboration taking place in Grand County across a wide range of stakeholders that is resulting in very tangible improvements in the ecological health of the Colorado River headwaters,โ€ according to a statement from the Grand County Learning By Doing Management Committee. 

โ€œThe projects selected are working through a collaborative process to achieve nature-based solutions for the health of our watersheds and river ecosystems to increase drought resiliency,โ€ said Reclamation Commissioner Camille Calimlim Touton. โ€œThis historic investment from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law gives Reclamation the opportunity to continue to collaborate with our stakeholders to leverage funds for these multi-benefit projects.โ€

โ€œDenver Water is proud to support ongoing stream improvement projects like those to be funded in this latest round of federal funding. Congratulations to Grand County Learning by Doing on this award. We look forward to working with our partners on the upcoming restoration work to Willow Creek and the Fraser River to benefit the Colorado River Basin,โ€ said Rick Marsicek, Chief of Water Resource Strategy at Denver Water.

Background

Assistant Leader Joe Neguse, whose district includes the headwaters of the Colorado River, has been steadfast in his efforts to address water-related issues, working to enact significant bills that invest in drought resilience and water management, while providing environmental benefits. Most recently, President Joe Biden signed his bill to extend authorization for the highly successful Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basins Endangered Fish Recovery Programs into law. Neguse also recently enacted the Drought Preparedness Act and Water Monitoring and Tracking Essential Resources (WATER) Data Improvement Act

As co-founder and Co-Chair of the Congressional Colorado River Caucus, Neguse has brought together a bipartisan mix of lawmakers each representing a state along the Colorado River Basin. The group is working to build consensus on critical issues plaguing the river and support the work of the Colorado River Basin states on how best to address the worsening levels of drought in the Colorado River Basin. 

The Rocky Mountains have gotten near-average snow this year. So, why are forecasts for #LakePowell inflows so low? — The Salt Lake Tribune #snowpack #runoff

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map January 16, 2025 via the NRCS.

Click the link to read the article on The Salt Lake Tribune website (Anastasia Hufham). Here’s an excerpt:

January 15, 2025

Snowpack levels across the Upper Colorado River Basin are close to average for this time of year, but forecasters say that might not translate to a comfortable year for the Colorado River…Moser reported that snow levels above Lake Powell, which straddles Utahโ€™s shared state line with Arizona, are 94% of average as of Jan. 1. (โ€œAverage,โ€ in forecasting, refers to the average precipitation between 1991 and 2020.) But forecasters currently predict that runoff into the reservoir between April and July will only be 81% of the thirty-year average. Thatโ€™s a drop from theย December forecast, which projected inflows of 92% of average…

Utahโ€™s soil moisture is also below average and worse than it was this time last year. That could impact how much water reaches the Colorado River and Lake Powell, since dry soil absorbs melting snow, leaving less water to run off mountains and into reservoirs this spring. In terms of actual water, 81% of normal runoff into Lake Powell between April and July is 5.15 million acre-feet; the median runoff over the last thirty years has been 6.13 million acre-feet.

Video: “Shoshone: The River’s Sentinel” — The #ColoradoRiver District #COriver #aridification

The Shoshone hydro plant in Glenwood Canyon. The River District has made a deal with Xcel Energy to buy the water rights associated with the plant to keep water flowing on the Western Slope. Credit: Heather Sackett/Aspen Journalism

The century-old water rights of the Shoshone Power Plant are essential to maintaining the flow and vitality of Colorado’s namesake river. The Colorado River District, alongside a diverse coalition of supporters, is working tirelessly to safeguard this critical resource, ensuring its benefits endure for ecosystems, communities, and future generations across Coloradoโ€™s Western Slope. Learn more at keepshoshoneflowing.org Learn more about the Colorado River District at ColoradoRiverDistrict.org

#Drought news January 16, 2025: D1 was expanded across southwestern #Colorado due to low snow water equivalent and 60-day SPI

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

On January 9 and 10, a low pressure system tracked along the Gulf Coast and resulted in widespread precipitation (1 to 2.5 inches, liquid equivalent) from eastern Texas and the Lower Mississippi Valley east to the Florida Panhandle. On the northern extent of this storm, snow blanketed areas from Oklahoma and Arkansas to north Georgia. This precipitation during the second week of January supported drought improvement. However, drought expanded and intensified for the Florida Peninsula, eastern North Carolina, west-central Texas, and the Southwest. During the first two weeks of January, multiple Arctic surface highs shifted south from Canada and temperatures (January 1-13) averaged 4 to 8 degrees F below normal for much of the Great Plains, Middle to Lower Mississippi Valley, and Southeast. A very dry start to the wet season continued to affect southern California with worsening drought conditions, periodic Santa Ana winds, and large wildfires. Enhanced trade winds, typical during a La Niรฑa winter, resulted in improving drought for the windward side of the Hawaiian Islands…

High Plains

The Central High Plains continued to have worsening drought conditions and moderate drought (D1) was expanded across portions of southwestern Nebraska using 60-day SPI, soil moisture below the 10th percentile, and the NDMC short-term blend. Although light precipitation (less than 0.5 inch, liquid equivalent) fell across parts of south-central to southeastern Kansas, this precipitation was too low to justify any improvements. Elsewhere, across the Central to Northern Great Plains, no changes were made as early to mid-January is a dry time of year. D1 was expanded across southwestern Colorado due to low snow water equivalent and 60-day SPI…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 14, 2025.

West

Severe drought (D2) was expanded to include all of southern California due to the very dry start to the water year to date (WYTD) from October 1, 2024 to January 13, 2025. The D2 coverage coincides with where WYTD precipitation has averaged less than 5 percent of normal. [ed. emphasis mine] A number of locations, including San Diego, are having their driest start to the water year. The D2 covers Los Angeles and Ventura counties which are being affected by periodic Santa Ana winds drying out vegetation and large wildfires. Following the two wet winters, the large reservoirs throughout California are at or above-normal. Based on 90-day SPI, declining soil moisture, and low snow water equivalent, a 1-category degradation was warranted for parts of Arizona and southwestern Utah. A mix of improvements and degradations were made to Idaho and the depiction is generally consistent with the 2024-2025 WYTD precipitation and snowpack. Eastern Washington and much of Oregon are drought-free, but low snowpack supports moderate drought (D1) along the northern Cascades of Washington. A 1-category improvement was justified for a portion of central Montana, based on 90-day SPEI along with snow water equivalent (SWE) above the 75th percentile. As of January 14, SWE was above-normal (period of record: 1991-2020) across the southern Cascades along with eastern Oregon and southwestern Idaho. SWE varies for the Sierra Nevada Mountains, those numbers are beginning to decrease after a drier-than-normal start to January. SWE remained well below-normal across the Four Corners Region…

South

More than 1 to 1.5 inches of precipitation (liquid equivalent) supported improvements for portions of eastern Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The small areas of severe drought (D2) were discontinued in northeastern Mississippi due to: 28-day average streamflows near the 20th percentile, soil moisture recovery, and a consensus of SPIs in D1 at worst. In addition, there is no support for maintaining D2 in the NDMC short- and long-term blends. Precipitation during the first two weeks of January resulted in a slight reduction in extreme drought (D3) across south-central Tennessee. For central Texas which received generous precipitation for this time of year, low 28-day streamflows (below the 20th percentile in D1 and 10th percentile in D2) precluded a larger area for a 1-category improvement. D2 to D3 drought was expanded across the Edwards Plateau of Texas due to 28-day average streamflows below the 10th and 5th percentile, respectively…

Looking Ahead

Another Arctic air outbreak is forecast for the central and eastern U.S. during mid-January as surface high pressure shifts south from Canada. By January 20, subzero minimum temperatures are expected as far south as the Central Great Plains, Middle Mississippi Valley, and Ohio Valley. During January 16-20, little to no precipitation is forecast from the West Coast to the Mississippi Valley with light to moderate precipitation amounts (0.5 to 1 inch) limited to the Southeast. These amounts, however, have been sufficient for rainfall to almost keep up with demand, and the near-normal amounts the past 2 weeks have kept the area out of D0 conditions for the time being, but the situation needs to be closely monitored for signs of increasing dryness impacts. Daily rainfall reports are not available for Mili since the start of January 2025, but 45.59โ€ fell during October-December 2024, above the normal of 36.55โ€ and well above the amount needed to keep up with demand, which is sufficient to keep D0 conditions at bay regardless the rainfall during the past 2 weeks.

The Climate Prediction Centerโ€™s 6-10 day outlook (valid January 21-25, 2025) favors below-normal temperatures to persist for much of the contiguous U.S. with the largest below-normal temperature probabilities (exceeding 80 percent) extending from the Mid-Atlantic and Ohio Valley south to the Gulf Coast. Elevated above-normal precipitation probabilities are forecast for the northern Great Plains, Gulf Coast, and portions of the Southeast. Below-normal precipitation is favored for the West, Central Great Plains, Midwest, and New England.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 14, 2025.

Record precipitation in 2024 gave little relief to irrigators: Most of the water ended up in the soil, not the unconfined aquifer — @AlamosaCitizen #RioGrande #SanLuisValley

Gauging station near Mogote on the Conejos River. Record precipitation did not translate to record river flows. Credit: The Citizen

Click the link to read the article on the Alamosa Citizen website:

January 15, 2025

Alamosa never gets 16 inches of total precipitation in a year. Never. Ever. Except that it did in 2024. 

Turns out, 2024 was among the wettest on record across the San Luis Valley going back to 1895, with all six counties registering historic levels of precipitation. Here are the precipitation totals by county, according to data from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information:

  • Alamosa County, 16.75 inches
  • Conejos County, 24.29 inches
  • Costilla County, 22.53 inches
  • Mineral County, 32.60 inches
  • Rio Grande County, 19.66 inches
  • Saguache County, 21.86 inches

The headscratching is how so much moisture was realized in a year when the unconfined aquifer of the Upper Rio Grande Basin dropped to near its lowest level, which became problematic for irrigators who are under orders by the state of Colorado to reduce their groundwater pumping to help recover the ailing aquifer.

โ€œTwo things,โ€ said Cleave Simpson, general manager of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and local hay grower. โ€œWe didnโ€™t have continuous steady snowpack in the winter months that put us in a good position, and then the volume of snow we got was on top of drier conditions last fall where moisture, instead of showing up in a stream, ends up in the ground in soil conditions.

โ€œSo to that end, this year at my farm in October, I get an inch and a half of rain, in October. That never, ever happens. So the hope is then, that nice soil moisture that we got in October will set us up for success.โ€

Craig Cotten, division engineer for the Colorado Division of Water Resources, said the wet 2024 was a boon to local farmers and their efforts to recover the Valleyโ€™s aquifers. What it didnโ€™t do was increase the amount of water stored in reservoirs.

โ€œThe reservoirs in the Rio Grande Basin in Colorado typically store water in winter when the senior priority ditches are shut off. The reservoirs can also store during the irrigation season, but only if there is a significant amount of water in the rivers to serve not only the irrigation ditches but the reservoirs as well,โ€ said Cotten.

โ€œThis typically requires very high river flows, which did not occur in 2024 even with the rain events that were the primary reason for the high precipitation total in 2024. The significant rains in the Rio Grande Basin did increase the river flows, but not enough to get the reservoirs into priority. The increase in reservoir storage in 2024 was about typical of what occurs in an average year.โ€

Without the high levels of precipitation in 2024, the critical unconfined aquifer was in danger of falling to a level of storage nobody was expecting to see after years of irrigators working to reduce their groundwater pumping.

Colorado precipitation for the 12 months ending January 15, 2024. Credit: High Plains Regional Climate Center.

โ€œThe large amount of precipitation in the Rio Grande Basin during the summer of 2024 helped the unconfined aquifer in multiple ways,โ€ said Cotten. โ€œThis precipitation increased the streamflow in the Rio Grande throughout the summer, allowing the ditches and canals to divert more water than they otherwise would have.

โ€œThis increased diversion in turn allowed delivery of a higher amount of water into recharge pits and the aquifer. The precipitation also helped to meet the irrigation needs of the crops, allowing the farmers to not pump their wells as much as they would otherwise.โ€

The hope among local farmers is that the wet fall months of 2024, when October and November delivered more than 11 inches of snow, will translate into an above-average spring runoff and give a boost to surface water coming into the Valley in 2025.

Rio Grande and Pecos River basins. Map credit: By Kmusser – Own work, Elevation data from SRTM, drainage basin from GTOPO [1], U.S. stream from the National Atlas [2], all other features from Vector Map., CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11218868