#ColoradoRiver: Conservation is the primary tool for @CAPArizona reduction targets #COriver

The Central Arizona Aqueduct delivers water from the Colorado River to underground aquifers in southern Arizona. UT researcher Bridget Scanlon recommends more water storage projects like the aqueduct to help protect against variability in the river’s water supply. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

From The Western Farm Press (Cary Blake):

The winter and spring storms were a real blessing for Arizona producers, says Chuck Cullom, CAP’s Colorado River programs manager.

In “August 2016, the probability of shortage (in Arizona) was greater than 50 percent for the next five years – for every year – upwards of 60 percent.”

Today, shortage prospects have dropped to about 30 percent.

“The risk has essentially been cut in half for the next five years because of the snowpack this year. We’ve (Colorado basin) had an incredibly wet December and January,” Cullom told about 900 agricultural folks gathered in late February for the 2017 Southwest Ag Summit held at Yuma, Ariz.

Cullom noted, “While I’m enthusiastic about the improvement it’s temporary and the structural deficit will erase these gains over the next couple of years.”

A Colorado River level one emergency shortage call was originally expected as early as last year or this year. The extra basin moisture could push back water reductions to central Arizona farms to about 2019 or later.

Lake Mead from Hoover Dam December 13, 2016.


Meanwhile, Arizona water leaders have their eyes peeled on the water mark at Lake Mead, the storage reservoir for the lower basin states and the largest reservoir in the nation. When the Mead dipstick measures water under the 1,075-foot mark around August of any given year, the secretary of the Interior can declare a Colorado River level one shortage call.

Arizona, specifically the central portion, would face the first water cuts under a shortage for the three lower basin states – California, Arizona, and Nevada. The annual Colorado River apportionment for these three states is 4.1 million acre feet for California, 2.4 million AF – Arizona, and 300,000 AF – Nevada.

California has senior rights in the lower basin and would receive every drop of water under its 4.1 million AF allotment under a level one shortage situation. Only Arizona’s allotment would be cut by 325,000 AF total which includes the 200,000 to 220,000 AF specifically earmarked for agriculture (75 percent of the reduction).

Also cut would be 75,000 to 100,000 acre feet of water (25 percent) normally shifted to underground storage (excess pool) by the Arizona Banking Authority and held for Arizona water emergencies.


Cullom says water delivery cutbacks to food and fiber growers in Arizona’s tri-county area would be “unfortunate.”

“Arizona has some of the most efficient agriculture in the West, if not the nation,” Cullom told the told the Ag Summit crowd. “(It would be) a significant reduction to ag.”

The water reductions would impact about 17 irrigation districts with CAP contracts.

With less surface water available to grow food and fiber, many farmers in the affected areas would be required to shift to more groundwater use to irrigate crops. This could be a serious problem for some growers as many old wells are in disrepair and repairs would be expensive at a time when grower prices for many of the major crops grown in the area – wheat, alfalfa, and cotton – are low. Some farm fields would likely be fallowed.

Under a level one call, the greater Yuma area in the state’s southwestern most reaches – regarded as the nation’s “winter salad bowl” leafy greens capital – would receive 100 percent of its river allotment due to its senior Arizona water rights on the river.

Each basin – the upper and lower – receives 7.5 MAF of water annually from the river. The upper basin states include Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, and New Mexico. The lower basin total also includes mandatory Colorado River water sent to the Republic of Mexico.


Cullom spent part of his presentation discussing various conservation efforts to reduce Colorado River water use inside and outside the CAP service area on a voluntary compensated basis – basically paying people not to use water.

One near term strategy is the Lake Mead protection program started in 2014 to keep the lake above the trigger level.

Cullom explains, “Suffering a 320,000 AF reduction for the CAP will impact our customers, the economy of central Arizona which is linked to the ag economy in Yuma, and that starts a problem that would be difficult to stop.”

He discussed a joint upper-lower basin initiative called the Pilot System Conservation Program, a cooperative agreement between the Bureau of Reclamation, Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, CAP, Southern Nevada Water Authority, and Denver Water.

These groups which represent the upper and lower basins are pooling financial resources to fund competitive conservation projects across both basins.

The projects would help mitigate drought across the entire Colorado River basin to help all users offset declining reservoir levels at lakes Mead and Powell. Lake Powell is the storage reservoir for the upper basin states, and the second largest U.S. reservoir.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.