USGS: Most River Flows across the U.S. are Altered by Land and Water Management, Leading to Ecological Degradation

A picture named usdroughtmonitor11022010

Here’s the link to the report here’s the release from the USGS (Daren Carlisle/Kara Capelli):

The amount of water flowing in streams and rivers has been significantly altered in nearly 90 percent of waters that were assessed in a new nationwide USGS study. Flow alterations are a primary contributor to degraded river ecosystems and loss of native species.

“This USGS assessment provides the most geographically extensive analysis to date of stream flow alteration,” said Bill Werkheiser, USGS Associate Director for Water. “Findings show the pervasiveness of stream flow alteration resulting from land and water management, the significant impact of altered stream flow on aquatic organisms, and the importance of considering this factor for sustaining and restoring the health of the Nation’s streams and ecosystems.”

Flows are altered by a variety of land- and water-management activities, including reservoirs, diversions, subsurface tile drains, groundwater withdrawals, wastewater inputs, and impervious surfaces, such as parking lots, sidewalks and roads.

“Altered river flows lead to the loss of native fish and invertebrate species whose survival and reproduction are tightly linked to specific flow conditions,” said Daren Carlisle, USGS ecologist and lead scientist on this study. “These consequences can also affect water quality, recreational opportunities and the maintenance of sport fish populations.”

For example, in streams with severely diminished flow, native trout, a popular sport fish that requires fast-flowing streams with gravel bottoms, are replaced by less desirable non-native species, such as carp. Overall, the USGS study indicated that streams with diminished flow contained aquatic communities that prefer slow moving currents more characteristic of lake or pond habitats.

“Management practices related to water demand continue to alter stream flows in many places,” said Jeff Ostermiller, Water Quality Manager with the Utah Division of Water Quality. “Understanding the ecological effects of these flow alterations helps water managers develop effective strategies to ensure that water remains sufficiently clean and abundant to support fisheries and recreation opportunities, while simultaneously supporting economic development.”

Annual and seasonal cycles of water flows — particularly the low and high flows — shape ecological processes in rivers and streams. An adequate minimum flow is important to maintain suitable water conditions and habitat for fish and other aquatic life. High flows are important because they replenish floodplains and flush out accumulated sediment that can degrade habitat.

“While this study provided the first, national assessment of flow alteration, focused studies within specific geographic regions will provide a better understanding of the ecological effects of altered stream flows, which can be more effectively applied to local water management challenges,” said Carlisle.

The severity and type of stream flow alteration varies among regions, due to natural landscape features, land practices, degree of development, and water demand. Differences are especially large between arid and wet climates. In wet climates, watershed management is often focused on flood control, which can result in lower maximum flows and higher minimum flows. Extremely low flows are the greatest concern in arid climates, in large part due to groundwater withdrawals and high water use for irrigation.

The study identified over 1,000 unimpaired streams to use as reference points to create stream flow models. The models were applied to estimate expected flows for 2,888 additional streams where the USGS had flow monitoring gauges from 1980-2007. The estimated values for the 2,888 streams were compared to actual, measured flows to determine the degree to which streams have been altered.

This study was conducted by the USGS National Water-Quality Assessment Program, which has assessed the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of streams and rivers across the nation since 1991.

For more than 125 years, the USGS has served as the Nation’s water monitoring agency, including flow and quality in selected streams and rivers across the United States. USGS continues to work closely with the Environmental Protection Agency and other federal agencies, states and local watersheds to assure that USGS monitoring and assessments provide useful information for managing and protecting streams throughout the Nation.

Water-quality data from more than 1,300 locations, much of it in real-time, are available through USGS Water Quality Watch. Additional information about surface water, groundwater and water quality is available at the National Water Information System Web Interface. You can also receive instant, customized updates about water conditions by subscribing to WaterAlert.

More coverage from The Summit County Citizens Voice (Bob Berwyn):

Flows are altered by a variety of land- and water-management activities, including reservoirs, diversions, subsurface tile drains, groundwater withdrawals, wastewater inputs, and impervious surfaces, such as parking lots, sidewalks and roads.

“Altered river flows lead to the loss of native fish and invertebrate species whose survival and reproduction are tightly linked to specific flow conditions,” said Daren Carlisle, USGS ecologist and lead scientist on this study. “These consequences can also affect water quality, recreational opportunities and the maintenance of sport fish populations.”

For example, in streams with severely diminished flow, native trout, a popular sport fish that requires fast-flowing streams with gravel bottoms, are replaced by less desirable non-native species, such as carp. Overall, the USGS study indicated that streams with diminished flow contained aquatic communities that prefer slow moving currents more characteristic of lake or pond habitats.

More USGS coverage here.

NIDIS Weekly Climate, Water and Drought Assessment Summary of the Upper Colorado River Basin

A picture named usdroughtmonitor11022010

Here are the notes for this week.

Don’t forget to register for the online webinar next week.

Mesa State College: The Effects of Water Management on Native Fishes in the Dolores and Yampa River Basins – Hydrology Matters

A picture named snaggletoothrdoloresriver.jpg

From email from Mesa State College (Gigi Richard)

Our next presentation in the Fall 2010 Natural Resources of the West: Water seminar series a project of the Water Center at Mesa State College will be…

Monday 8 November, 4:00 pm
Saccomanno Lecture Hall, Wubben Science Building, Room 141 (WS 141)
Mesa State College

The Effects of Water Management on Native Fishes in the Dolores and Yampa River Basins – Hydrology Matters

David Graf, Water Resource Specialist, Colorado Division of Wildlife

Seminars are free and open to the public, no registration necessary.
For the entire seminar series schedule, please see:

http://home.mesastate.edu/~grichard/WSS/Seminar2010.html

For more information please contact:

Prof. Gigi Richard, 970.248.1689, grichard@mesastate.edu
Prof. Tamera Minnick, 970.248.1663, tminnick@mesastate.edu

More Dolores River watershed coverage here. More Yampa River basin coverage here.

Energy policy — hydroelectric: Public Comments Sought on Potential Hydropower Development at Existing Reclamation Facilities

A picture named hydroelectricdam.jpg

Here’s the release from the Bureau of Reclamation (Peter Soeth):

The Bureau of Reclamation has issued a Federal Register Notice announcing the availability for public review and comment the Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities Draft Report (pdf). This draft report is an assessment of the economic and technical potential for hydropower development at existing Reclamation owned non-powered dams and structures.
The draft report provides an inventory of hydropower potential at existing Reclamation sites using broad energy and economic criteria. It does not make any recommendation for development of the sites included in the report.

Reclamation signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Department of Energy and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to increase renewable energy generation by focusing on development of sustainable, low impact, and small hydropower projects. To help meet the goal of the MOU, Reclamation produced an updated list of facilities and sites best suited for projects to increase sustainable hydropower generation.

Comments may be submitted by mail or email to:

Michael Pulskamp
Bureau of Reclamation
Denver Federal Center, Bldg 67
PO Box 25007
Denver, CO 80225
Email: mpulskamp@usbr.gov

Comments must be received by December 3, 2010.

The draft report and Federal Register Notice is available for download on Reclamation’s website at www.usbr.gov/power/.

More hydroelectric coverage here and here.

Energy policy — nuclear: The Colorado Department of Natural Resources gives Cotter Corp two weeks to berm uranium tailing piles at dormant mine near the Dolores River

A picture named uranium.jpg

From The Denver Post (Bruce Finley):

The regulators ordered Cotter to build berms around the 300 to 500 tons of uranium ore by Nov. 17 and to remove the uranium by early next year. “The worry is that an inactive mine can have maintenance and upkeep problems. It could cause polluted runoff,” said Bob Randall, deputy director of Colorado’s Department of Natural Resources. “What we want Cotter to do is clear it. They’ve got to put the berms up. They’ve got two weeks to do it.” Regulators also have ordered Cotter to submit an environmental protection plan.

Separately, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment officials are poised to renew Cotter’s water-discharge permit for the mine, requiring compliance with current federal standards, said Steve Gunderson, the agency’s water-quality director…

Cotter’s mine sits on federal Bureau of Land Management land, leased by the U.S. Department of Energy. It is one of several uranium sites where state environmental overseers are pressing Cotter for cleanup action.

More nuclear coverage here and here.

New study questions the effectiveness of cloud seeding

A picture named cloudseedingexplained.jpg

From Science Daily:

…research now reveals that the common practice of cloud seeding with materials such as silver iodide and frozen carbon dioxide may not be as effective as it had been hoped. In the most comprehensive reassessment of the effects of cloud seeding over the past fifty years, new findings from Prof. Pinhas Alpert, Prof. Zev Levin and Dr. Noam Halfon of Tel Aviv University’s Department of Geophysics and Planetary Sciences have dispelled the notion that seeding is an effective mechanism for precipitation enhancement.

The findings were recently reported in Atmospheric Research…

During the course of his study, Prof. Alpert and his colleagues looked over fifty years’ worth of data on cloud seeding, with an emphasis on the effects of seeding on rainfall amounts in a target area over the Sea of Galilee in the north of Israel. The research team used a comprehensive rainfall database and compared statistics from periods of seeding and non-seeding, as well as the amounts of precipitation in adjacent non-seeded areas. “By comparing rainfall statistics with periods of seeding, we were able to show that increments of rainfall happened by chance,” says Prof. Alpert. “For the first time, we were able to explain the increases in rainfall through changing weather patterns” instead of the use of cloud seeding.

More cloud seeding coverage here and here.

Energy policy — oil and gas: New produced water facility planned for south of Rifle

A picture named derrick.jpg

From the Grand Junction Free Press (John Colson):

The Greenback Produced Water Recovery LLC will be building what is technically termed a “solid waste disposal site and facility” on a 40-acre property known locally as the Shaeffer Ranch, about four miles south of Interstate 70, southeast of Rifle. The facility, according to documents on file with Garfield County, will “treat, store and reuse produced water from oil and gas operations.” The facility will occupy about 11 acres of the larger parcel. According to Dan Packard, one of the company’s representatives, produced water will be trucked to the facility from well pads throughout the region, where it will be filtered, separated from any remaining oil and gas, clarified and “air stripped.” It can then be put into the same tanker trucks that brought the water to the facility in the first place, and taken back to the drilling pads for reuse…

Packard said that, once treated, the water is suitable for use in toilets and for hand-washing, and that it will be put to those uses at the facility itself.

More OIl and Gas coverage here and here.