Well, #COP24 wrapped up with a commitment to implement the Paris Accords, but not before young Swede Greta Thunberg delivered a scolding message to the folks who are not treating Climate Change like the crisis it is.
From CommonDreams.org (Jon Queally):
“”We can no longer save the world by playing by the rules,” says Greta Thunberg, “because the rules have to be changed.” — Greta Thunberg
Striking her mark at the COP24 climate talks taking place this week and next in Poland, fifteen-year-old Greta Thunberg of Sweden issued a stern rebuke on behalf of the world’s youth climate movement to the adult diplomats, executives, and elected leaders gathered by telling them she was not there asking for help or demanding they comply with demands but to let them know that new political realities and a renewable energy transformation are coming whether they like it or not.
“Since our leaders are behaving like children, we will have to take the responsibility they should have taken long ago,” said Thunberg, who has garnered international notoriety for weekly climate strikes outside her school in Sweden, during a speech on Monday.
Thunberg said that she was not asking anything of the gathered leaders—even as she sat next to UN Secretary General António Guterres—but only asking the people of the world “to realize that our political leaders have failed us, because we are facing an existential threat and there’s no time to continue down this road of madness.”
Thunberg explained that while the world consumes an estimated 100 million barrels of oil each day, “there are no politics to change that. There are no politics to keep that oil in the ground. So we can no longer save the world by playing by the rules, because the rules have to be changed.”
“So we have not come here to beg the world leaders to care for our future,” she declared. “They have ignored us in the past and they will ignore us again. We have come here to let them know that change is coming whether they like it or not. The people will rise to the challenge.”
“On climate change,” said Kevin Anderson, professor of energy and climate change at the University of Manchester, the teenage Thunberg “demonstrates more clarity and leadership in one speech than a quarter of a century of the combined contributions of so called world leaders. Wilful ignorance and lies have overseen a 65 percent rise in CO2 since 1990. Time to hand over the baton.”
Watch Thunberg’s full remarks:
The climate crisis, she said, “is the biggest crisis humanity has ever faced. First we have to realize this and then as fast as possible do something to stop the emissions and try to save what we can save.”
From Medium.com (Mark Watts):
Climate science tells us that 1.5°C is likely to become the most important number in human history
There is nothing in the laws of physics and chemistry to prevent humanity from stopping global heating getting out of control. Yet there is also no historical precedent for the scale and pace of the political and economic transformation that is needed to achieve that goal. This was the message of the the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change’s(IPCC) ‘Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C’ (SR1.5), released earlier this year.
While at the climate talks in Poland this week the leaders of the USA, Russia and Saudi Arabia have been explicitly arguing against using science to inform inter-governmental decisions, showing unprecedented levels of cynicism and irresponsibility, cities and their networks are clear: we welcome the clarity of the global climate science community and thank the IPCC for their fundamental work. C40, indeed, has adopted 1.5°C as our only science-based target since December 2016.
It is indeed in the world’s greatest cities that our collective fate on this planet will be determined.
As Al Gore has pointed out, the current generation of leaders are the first to benefit from unequivocal science and data on climate change. Those in office today are also likely to be amongst the last who are in a position to make decisions that will prevent global heating accelerating past 1.5°C.
It is a big responsibility but also a huge opportunity to achieve change that will reap numerous immediate rewards, as well as incalculable benefits for generations to come.
To help mayors of the world’s most influential and powerful cities to deliver on this incredible responsibility and opportunity, C40 Cities, the Global Covenant of Mayors, and 18 scientists from the IPCC SR1.5 today released the Summary for Urban Policymakers: What the IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C means for cities.
The 1.5°C crossroads
The Summary makes it clear that the only “science-based” target for humanity’s long-term future, is to limit global heating below 1.5°C and sets out that:
Allowing global warming to reach 2°C or higher will massively increase food insecurity, water shortages, poverty and take a devastating toll on human health.
We are not on track: current commitments by national governments will deliver between 2.9 and 3.4 °C of average global warming by the end of the century. This is potentially devastating for human society.
To achieve a 2 in 3 chance of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C we must reduce our global CO2 emissions to zero within the next two decades.
Even if this is achieved, significant investments in adaptation are likely to still be required to reduce risks and impacts. However, adaptation has limits. Exceeding 1.5°C will lead us into a highly uncertain world where not all systems can adapt, and not all impacts can be reversed.
Realistically, a 1.5°C world can only happen if major policy decisions are taken in the next four to five years. Each year we delay the start of emission reductions that the science makes clear we need, the window to reach zero emissions on a pathway to 1.5°C is reduced by two years. Each year, the task becomes more difficult and more expensive.
Action in towns, cities and regions
The IPCC identifies crucial areas of action in urban areas that will be key to national governments meeting their targets and unlocking a 1.5°C future for us all. Many C40 cities have already made action commitments across these areas, which could form the basis of global targets for all towns and cities:
Buildings and energy: New urban construction everywhere must consume near-zero energy by the 2020s. In the Global North, 5% of all buildings must be retrofitted every year from 2020. The C40 action commitment on Buildings, signed by 22 cities, 12 global businesses, and 4 states/regions is to make all new buildings net zero carbon by 2030. A sub-set of cities have also committed to only own, occupy or lease buildings that are net zero by the same deadline. Transport and urban planning: To hit the necessary emissions reductions from transport systems will require a major transformation in how citizens move around cities. Millions more journeys will need to be on foot or bike or avoided all together. Urban transport will need to run on electricity from a grid powered by renewable energy. The C40 action commitment, signed by 26 cities, is to make a major area of the city a fossil-fuel free zone, maximising cycling and walking, by 2030; and to only purchase zero-emission buses from 2025 at the latest. Green infrastructure: Trees, parks, green roofs and water features must come to dominate the urban landscape, helping reduce climate risks whilst also bringing down GHG emissions. Sustainable and resilient land use: Cities will be increasingly exposed to climate related floods, heatwaves wild fires and sea level rise. Planning decisions made today must help reduce those risks and prepare for those consequences. Sustainable water management: Waste water recycling, storm water diversion, and smart urban design can reduce the risks of climate related flooding and reduce demand for fresh water.
Whilst prepared for urban policy makers, the Summary is clear that city governments cannot do this alone. Action from regional and national governments is vital to enable cities to deliver the necessary transformations. In particular, to keep global heating to a minimum of 1.5°C will require:
1. Energy grid decarbonization: Renewables will need to supply 70–85% of electricity by 2050. Cities and urban areas can only deliver their fair share of emissions reductions if the electricity grid is decarbonised.
2. Accountable multi-level governance: Local action and participatory processes are most effective when local and regional governments are supported by national governments.
3. Finance: To stay below 1.5°C, we can expect the level of investment to be orders of magnitude greater than previously thought. In the energy sector alone, it is estimated that we will need an investment of US$2.4 trillion annually between 2016 and 2035 to keep to the target.
Getting to 1.5°C: A call to action
The sobering conclusion of the Summary for Urban Policymakers is that we need to pursue aggressive strategies to limit global heating to 1.5°C, while preparing our towns, cities for the climate impacts that are already happening.
We have also seen in recent weeks that it is very easy to get climate action wrong. President Macron’s combination of tax cuts for the wealthy, along with fuel duty rises which have disproportionately effect those on lower incomes, has provoked a strong reaction across France. As a result, climate action is wrongly tainted as being unfair and reducing the social and economic well-being of the majority, while the one percent can afford to carry on polluting.
Instead, climate justice and social justice need to go hand and hand. That is why we need inclusive and just climate action that delivers for all citizens in every part of the globe. Without urgent action, continued progress will become incredibly challenging. In this sense, action on climate change is development.
Citizens are increasingly demanding action and changing their own lifestyles. Mayors can take heart from this and engage with communities to drive bigger changes. The Global Climate Action Summit in San Francisco this year showed the huge latent potential for regional government, business and cities to work together, whatever their respective national governments’ levels of ambition.
Therefore, 1.5°C is likely to become the most important number in human history.
It is already the target adopted by C40, since 2016, as the level of ambition needed to be part of our network. I am looking forward to working with C40 mayors and all our partners in 2019 to redouble our efforts to make this transformation a reality.
From the BBC (Matt McGrath):
Last-minute rows over carbon markets threatened to derail the two-week summit – and delayed it by a day.
Delegates believe the new rules will ensure that countries keep their promises to cut carbon.
The Katowice agreement aims to deliver the Paris goals of limiting global temperature rises to well below 2C.
“Putting together the Paris agreement work programme is a big responsibility,” said the chairman of the talks, known as COP24, Michal Kurtyka.
“It has been a long road. We did our best to leave no-one behind.”
What did the delegates focus on?
The summit accord, reached by 196 states, outlines plans for a common rulebook for all countries – regulations that will govern the nuts and bolts of how countries cut carbon, provide finance to poorer nations and ensure that everyone is doing what they say they are doing.
Sorting out the rulebook sounds easy but is very technical. Countries often have different definitions and timetables for their carbon cutting actions.
Poorer countries want some “flexibility” in the rules so that they are not overwhelmed with regulations that they don’t have the capacity to put into practice.
The idea of being legally liable for causing climate change has long been rejected by richer nations, who fear huge bills well into the future.
A deadlock between Brazil and other countries over the rules for the monitoring of carbon credits threatened to derail the talks.
Brazil had been pushing for a weaker set of rules on carbon markets, despite strong opposition from many other countries. These discussions have now been deferred until next year.
Further tensions emerged last weekend, scientists and delegates were shocked when the US, Saudi Arabia, Russia and Kuwait objected to the meeting “welcoming” a recent UN report on keeping global temperature rise to within the 1.5C limit.
The report said the world is now completely off track, heading more towards 3C this century.
In a compromise, the final statement from the summit welcomed the “completion” of the report and invited countries to make use of it.
Is this enough?
Laurence Tubiana, a key architect of the Paris agreement, and now with the European Climate Foundation, said the agreement was a big boost for the Paris pact.
“The key piece was having a good transparency system because it builds trust between countries and because we can measure what is being done and it is precise enough,” she told BBC News on the sidelines of this meeting.
“I am happy with that. Nobody can say that’s not clear, we don’t know what to do, or that it’s not true anymore. It’s very clear,”
She said that countries like Russia- which had refused to ratify the Paris agreement because it wasn’t sure about the rules – could no longer use that excuse.
However some observers say the deal is not sufficiently strong to deal with the urgency of the climate problem.
In the words of one delegate, “it’s what’s possible, but not what’s necessary”.
What about cutting carbon faster?
There has been a big push for countries to up their ambition, to cut carbon deeper and with greater urgency.
Many delegates want to see a rapid increase in ambition before 2020 to keep the chances of staying under 1.5C alive.
Right now, the plans that countries lodged as part of the Paris agreement don’t get anywhere near that, described as “grossly insufficient” by one delegate from a climate vulnerable country.
Business is also looking for a signal from this meeting about the future.
“Companies are ready to invest and banks are ready to finance,” said Carlos Salle from Spanish energy conglomerate, Iberdrola.
“So we need that greater ambition in the policy to enable business to move further and faster.”
“There is No silver bullet, as they say, but there is plenty of silver buckshot” — Katherine Hayhoe