Parachute Creek Spill: Amount of contaminated groundwater siphoned from the spill has surpassed 369,000 gallons #ColoradoRiver

parachutecreekspilllocation2013.jpg

From The Denver Post (Bruce Finley):

The amount of contaminated groundwater siphoned from the spill, revealed in March, also is growing and has surpassed 369,000 gallons. While 155,000 gallons already was buried in a disposal well, 214,000 gallons currently in storage tanks will be treated on site and pumped back into groundwater along the creek, Colorado health officials said in response to queries last week.

Six months after the spill by Williams energy companies, which tainted the creek with cancer-causing benzene, the continuing cleanup and looming restoration work show a widening impact on resources. An underground plume created by the spill covers 10.6 acres and is still contaminating groundwater…

Along Parachute Creek, “all remaining petroleum-contaminated soil associated with the pipeline release will be removed from the site by the end of July,” said Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment spokesman Mark Salley. “The cleanup of hydrocarbons will continue until recoverable hydrocarbon is no longer present in the groundwater and the hydrocarbon is no longer contaminating the groundwater.”

An additional 280 cubic yards of contaminated soil has already been sent to the East Carbon Development Co. landfill, located 150 miles southeast of Salt Lake City. It handles heavy-duty waste such as New York harbor dredgings and Los Angeles sludge. Williams and CDPHE worked out the plan for removal of excavated soil. No deadline for completion of the overall cleanup and restoration has been set. Neither the CDPHE nor the COGCC has imposed penalties on Williams…

Williams officials contend 80 percent of spilled liquids evaporated and that 10,122 gallons entered soil.

Chemicals in the liquids include benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, hexanes and heptanes, CDPHE officials said. Other chemicals found in recovery trenches — tetrachloroethene and bromoform — are not from natural gas liquids.

Oil and gas industry response crews dug trenches and have been collecting the concentrated hydrocarbon liquids — an effort to stop the contamination of groundwater. Those liquids — about 7,490 gallons collected so far — can be cycled back into Williams’ plant.

A system for treating contaminated groundwater on-site, tested last weekend, must remove contaminants so that water can be discharged under a permit through a filtration system into groundwater along the creek, Salley said. The contaminated groundwater “will be treated to meet standards before being returned to the water table,” he said, “and does not pose a risk to public health.”

More oil and gas coverage here and here.

Maroon Creek: Pitkin County is first with instream pact with the Colorado Water Conservation Board

cascadefallsroaringforkriver06082010.jpg

From the Aspen Daily News (Brent Gardner-Smith):

It has cost $200,000 and taken four years, but Pitkin County is poised to become the first county in Colorado to sign a long-term lease with the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) to leave water in a river for environmental purposes and also have the deal sanctified in state water court. The deal will allow Pitkin County to legally let up to 3.83 cubic feet per second (cfs) of water run freely past the Stapleton Brothers ditch headgate on Maroon Creek near Iselin Field. The water, part of a senior water right the county holds on Stapleton Ditch, will be protected for the benefit of the riparian ecosystem as it flows to lower Maroon Creek and into the Roaring Fork River as far as Owl Creek.

Pitkin County Attorney John Ely has been pioneering this two-step approach since early 2009 and now says the county has reached consensus with opposing water rights owners in water court. The proposed decree “has been accepted in principal by all the opposers and is currently being circulated for execution,” Ely wrote in a June 20 memo…

In practice, the county has not been diverting about half of the 8 cfs of water it owns in the Stapleton Ditch for years. It initially pursued protection for 4.3 cfs of the Stapleton ditch water, which has a senior water right dating to 1904. Ely said the county’s water was not legally protected as an environmental flow right and the county was potentially vulnerable to abandonment claims in water court since it was not using the water as decreed for irrigation.

The county’s efforts started in 2008 after the passage of Colorado House Bill 1280, which reduced the long-term financial downside to using water for environmental purposes. In November 2009, the county approved a long-term trust agreement with the CWCB, becoming the first, and still the only, county to do so after the passage of HB 1280. The CWCB is the state entity in charge of overseeing environmental instream-flow rights in Colorado streams, rivers and lakes. “This is the first county that we’ve entered into this type of relationship with and we hope it is a template for other counties to follow,” said Linda Bassi, the section chief of the CWCB’s stream and lake protection division…

The county wanted to help protect the rivers’ ecosystems, but it also wanted to establish a new process under Colorado law, retain its water rights, and have the option to terminate the lease — after an initial 10-year period — and take back its water rights, Ely said…

The most water the county will be able legally leave in lower in Maroon Creek is 3.83 cfs and the average amount is 1.22 cfs from May to October. The CWCB has a 1976 instream-flow right of 14 cfs on Maroon Creek, which due to its relatively young age has a lower priority than many other rights. And between the confluence of Maroon Creek and the confluence of Owl Creek, the county can leave up to 3.54 cfs water (1.13 cfs on average) in the Roaring Fork River, where the CWCB has a summer flow right of 55 cfs and a winter flow right of 30 cfs. Those protective rights date to 1985. “It still can have meaningful benefits by helping with temperature issues,” Bassi said about the water in the Fork just below Maroon Creek. “And it provides an incremental level of usable habitat for fish and other organisms. It is definitely going to be a benefit.”

Ely said the county also showed that securing both a long-term lease and a change decree in water court is possible, since it has never been done before in this manner…

…overall, Bassi said Pitkin County’s procedural efforts have been productive and bode well for additional efforts to protect river ecosystems. “It always helps to have an example of how these tools work in the real world, that the sky didn’t fall when they did it, and that it really can work,” Bassi said. “We’re really happy that we’re finally close to a decree.”

More instream flow coverage here.