#AnimasRiver: EPA worker will not face prosecution — The Farmington Daily Times #GoldKingMine

This image was taken during the peak outflow from the Gold King Mine spill at 10:57 a.m. Aug. 5. The waste-rock dump can be seen eroding on the right. Federal investigators placed blame for the blowout squarely on engineering errors made by the Environmental Protection Agency’s-contracted company in a 132-page report released Thursday [October 22, 2015]
This image was taken during the peak outflow from the Gold King Mine spill at 10:57 a.m. Aug. 5. The waste-rock dump can be seen eroding on the right. Federal investigators placed blame for the blowout squarely on engineering errors made by the Environmental Protection Agency’s-contracted company in a 132-page report released Thursday [October 22, 2015]

From The Farmington Daily Times (Noel Lyn Smith):

The Colorado U.S. Attorney’s Office will not prosecute a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency employee in connection to the Gold King Mine spill.

The decision was reached on Oct. 6 and after the EPA’s Office of Inspector General submitted information about whether the employee may have violated the Clean Water Act and provided false statements, according to an update released this week by the Office of Inspector General.

Jeffery Dorschner, spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Colorado, declined to comment about the decision today. The update does not name the employee or provide details about the allegations.

The update states the Office of Inspector General will prepare and submit a Report of Investigation to the EPA’s senior management for review. There is no requirement to submit the report by a certain time, Office of Inspector General spokesman Jeff Lagda said.

EPA officials have taken responsibility for causing the August 2015 mine blowout that released approximately 880,000 pounds of heavy metals into a tributary of the Animas River.

Congressional delegates from New Mexico remain steadfast in holding accountable those responsible for the spill.

Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., said he looks forward to reviewing the Office of Inspector General report and will ensure the EPA acts on the findings.

“This decision will not affect my work one bit to ensure the people who are still hurting as a result of the spill are compensated,” Udall said in an emailed statement, adding he continues to push the EPA to reimburse state and local governments for responding to the spill.

Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., said in an email the EPA’s course of action for cleaning up the mine “fell far short of the standards.” He added communities need reimbursement for response costs and called for reforming outdated policies regarding mine cleanup.

“We shouldn’t wait for more disasters to strike. Western communities deserve full and complete protection of their water, land and livelihoods,” Heinrich said.

Rep. Ben Ray Luján, D-N.M., said he is “deeply concerned” by the EPA’s failures and will “closely” review the report findings.

“In the meantime, I will continue to fight to make the affected communities whole, to ensure robust long-term water quality monitoring, and to prevent a disaster like this from occurring again,” Luján said in an email.

Gold King Mine entrance after blowout August 2015
Gold King Mine entrance after blowout August 2015

Navajo Nation President Russell Begaye was among those who visited the mine in the days that followed the spill.

Begaye said EPA administrators and engineers were informed by hydrologists and other experts the mine was unsafe.

“It was the administrators who had these documents that were aware of potential explosions and the pressure that had built up,” he said in an email. “They knew about this and they did nothing. They allowed a single worker to sit in the backhoe and start to clean out the area.”

Begaye added that to place blame on one individual is “unfounded.”

Navajo Nation Council Speaker LoRenzo Bates said the decision by the Colorado U.S. Attorney’s Office has no impact on the lawsuit the tribe filed against the EPA and other entities in August.

“The nation has spoken and is holding the U.S. EPA responsible,” Bates said in a phone interview.

The action by the attorney’s office also prompted response from leaders of two House committees.

Reps. Rob Bishop, R-Utah, Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, and Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., have asked U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch to meet with the committees by Oct. 26 to explain the decision.

In their letter to Lynch, they wrote that congressional staff learned about the Colorado U.S. Attorney’s decision on Tuesday during a conference call with the Office of Inspector General.

During the call, the office stated it found evidence of criminal wrongdoing by the EPA, the letter states.

“By not taking up the case, the Department of Justice looks like it is going easy on its colleagues in EPA,” the representatives wrote.

A staff member with the Committee on Natural Resources, which Bishop chairs, said Lynch had not respond to the request as of today.

On April 7,  2016, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed adding the “Bonita Peak Mining District” to the National Priorities List, making it eligible for Superfund. Forty-eight mine portals and tailings piles are “under consideration” to be included. The Gold King Mine will almost certainly be on the final list, as will the nearby American Tunnel. The Mayflower Mill #4 tailings repository, just outside Silverton, is another likely candidate, given that it appears to be leaching large quantities of metals into the Animas River. What Superfund will entail for the area beyond that, and when the actual cleanup will begin, remains unclear. Eric Baker
On April 7, 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency proposed adding the “Bonita Peak Mining District” to the National Priorities List, making it eligible for Superfund. Forty-eight mine portals and tailings piles are “under consideration” to be included. The Gold King Mine will almost certainly be on the final list, as will the nearby American Tunnel. The Mayflower Mill #4 tailings repository, just outside Silverton, is another likely candidate, given that it appears to be leaching large quantities of metals into the Animas River. What Superfund will entail for the area beyond that, and when the actual cleanup will begin, remains unclear.
Eric Baker

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s