Upper Arkansas Water Conservancy District directors agreed to continue pursuing the districtās proposed Multi-use Project during the monthly board meeting Thursday in Salida. Director Greg Felt, Salida, provided an overview of the project, which has remained largely dormant for the past 2 years, and noted the widespread appeal of the project among diverse state agencies, local government entities and the conservation and recreation communities.
Benefits of the project would include:
⢠Preservation of agricultural irrigation.
⢠Two water storage reservoirs.
⢠Alluvial aquifer water storage.
⢠Conservation easements.
⢠Wildlife corridor protections.
⢠Protections for deer and elk populations.
⢠Drought water supply.
⢠New public access to the Arkansas River.
⢠New boating access to the river.
⢠Hydroelectric electricity generation.
Felt pointed out that these benefits align almost perfectly with Colorado water management objectives as identified by the Statewide Water Supply Initiative, or SWSI (swahzee), 2010 report.
Major components of the project would include Chaffee Countyās most senior water right, the Trout Creek Ditch; the Helena Ditch; Moltz Reservoir; a proposed gravel pit reservoir; and 6,000-12,000 acre-feet of proposed aquifer storage.
Felt said significant challenges facing the project include financing and working with five different property owners.
District Manager Terry Scanga said he sent a proposal to the Colorado Water Conservation Board concerning the project and the potential for financing through the CWCB and said he would follow up to get a meeting set.
District Engineer Ivan Walter said, āThe project is thereā from an engineering standpoint and in terms of SWSI objectives. āIt would be a missed opportunity if the Upper Ark (district) didnāt do it.ā
Director Jeff Ollinger, Buena Vista, has a background in finance and suggested using the CWCB finance application to prepare for the CWCB meeting. He also noted the potential for the district to leverage other assets as collateral to obtain sufficient financing for the project.
Ollinger also stressed the need to accurately assess the risks associated with the project, citing the potential for wildfire in the Trout Creek drainage and the potential for a hazardous material spill along U.S. 24/285 between Johnson Village and Trout Creek Pass.
Either of these events could significantly affect water quality and, therefore, the ability of the Multi-use Project to generate revenue to make loan payments.
Prior to the regular board meeting, directors met as the Enterprise Committee. Agenda items for the committee meeting included a financial report, an augmentation report, a reservoir and water storage report, and a precipitation and streamflow report.
In other business, Upper Ark directors:
Learned that Upper Colorado Basin snowpack conditions are similar to those in 2011 when the Frying Pan-Arkansas Project delivered 98,900 acre-feet of water to the Arkansas River and that the district has requested 1,000 acre-feet of project water for 2014.
Heard a legislative report from consultant Ken Baker, who said the Flex Water Market bill had been changed to prevent leased water from being diverted outside the basin of historic use for the water right in question.
Voted to drop Water Court case 95CW234, involving district efforts to extend augmentation services into the Texas Creek drainage.
Heard a presentation by U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Colorado Office Chief David Mau about the detrimental effects of wildfire runoff on water quality and how to mitigate those effects.
Learned the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District approved a stipulation in Water Court case 04CW95 and signed a storage agreement with the Upper Ark district.
Were reminded that four directorsā seats are up for reappointment, and candidates have until May 1 to submit an application.
Learned district staff members are developing a memorandum of understanding with the town of Buena Vista for the Cottonwood Creek Integrated Management Plan.
Agreed to have legal counsel draft comments regarding the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agencyās proposed rules pertaining to water resources.