17 #Colorado water, #drought projects in limbo after Trump halts spending from Biden-era law — Shannon Mullane (Fresh Water News)

Dillon Reservoir is Denver Waterโ€™s largest reservoir. It sends water to the Front Range via the 23-mile-long Roberts Tunnel under the Continental Divide. Photo credit: Denver Water.

Click the link to read the article on the Water Education Colorado website (Shannon Mullane):

January 23, 2024

On Friday, in the last hours of the Biden administration, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation announced it would spend $388.3 million for environmental projects in Colorado and three other Colorado River Basin states.

Now that funding is in limbo.

The money was set to come from a Biden-era law, the Inflation Reduction Act. On Monday, President Donald Trump ordered federal agencies to halt spending money under the act. Lawmakers were still trying to understand whether the freeze applied to the entire Inflation Reduction Act or portions of it as of Wednesday afternoon.

Shoshone Falls hydroelectric generation station via USGenWeb

The new executive order focused on energy spending but also raised questions about funding for environmental projects in the Colorado River Basin, including $40 million for western Coloradoโ€™s effort to buy powerful water rights tied to Shoshone Power Plant on the Colorado River and 16 other projects in Colorado.

Past regulations have been burdensome and impeded the development of the countryโ€™s energy resources, according to the executive order.

โ€œIt is thus in the national interest to unleash Americaโ€™s affordable and reliable energy and natural resources,โ€ the order said. โ€œThis will restore American prosperity โ€” including for those men and women who have been forgotten by our economy in recent years.โ€

The president issued dozens of executive actions within hours of his inauguration, including rescinding 78 of former President Joe Bidenโ€™s executive actions.

Where spending is stalled, federal agencies will have 90 days to review their funding processes to make sure they align with the Trump administrationโ€™s policies.

For now, the future is unsure for 42 environmental projects in four states โ€” Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming.

Environmental efforts for the Colorado River

The proposed projects focus on improving habitats, ecological stability and resilience against drought in the Colorado River Basin, where prolonged drought and overuse have cast uncertainty over the future water supply for 40 million people. Reclamation also awarded $100 million for Colorado River environmental projects in Arizona, California and Nevada.

Coloradans were promised up to about $135 million from the Inflation Reduction Act as part of the Upper Basin Environmental Drought Mitigation Program. Itโ€™s one of many buckets that have distributed money from the act to Colorado.

This map shows the 15-mile reach of the Colorado River near Grand Junction, home to four species of endangered fish. Map credit: CWCB

With the funding, people around the state hope to upgrade infrastructure to help protect 15 miles of key habitat near Grand Junction for endangered species on the Colorado River. They want to improve aquatic habitats along rivers in Grand County, where low flows threaten fish and aquatic life, and restore ancient, water- and carbon-storing fens.

โ€œIt wasnโ€™t surprising, but we still need to wait to see how it gets interpreted, and what itโ€™s going to apply to or not apply to,โ€ said Steve Wolff, general manager of the Southwestern Water Conservation District. The district joined with local partners to apply for funding for 17 projects in southwestern Colorado and was awarded $25.6 million.

โ€œWe would all be very disappointed if any of this money was removed,โ€ Wolff said. โ€œThese funds are really bipartisan and are meant to get put on the ground and do good work.โ€

The town of Silverton, Colorado, USA as seen from U.S. Route 550. By Daniel Schwen – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=10935432

One of those projects aims to restore ancient fens along Highway 550, known as the Million Dollar Highway, between Silverton and Ouray in southwestern Colorado.

These fens, between 6,000 and 14,000 years old, naturally store carbon and slow runoff from the mountains, helping to maintain flows into the summer when water runs low and demand outpaces supply. Drought, a history of mining, and human impacts in the area have degraded the fen ecosystems over time, said Jake Kurzweil, a hydrologist with Mountain Studies Institute in southwestern Colorado.

The project managers want to hire locally to help the rural economy. And the work would help restore river ecosystems where they begin โ€” at their headwaters โ€” if the funding actually comes through.

โ€œUntil thereโ€™s a contract in place, we wonโ€™t be including it in our budgets,โ€ Kurzweil said. โ€œWeโ€™re optimistically hopeful, but not counting our chickens before they hatch.โ€

Of the 42 Upper Colorado River projects awarded funds from the Inflation Reduction Act, 17 projects would include work in Colorado:

San Juan River Basin. Graphic credit Wikipedia.
  • Southern Ute Indian Tribeโ€™s Pine River Environment Drought Mitigation Project: Up to $16.7 million:ย The funding would improve the health of the Pine River watershed, fish passage,ย deteriorating infrastructure,ย and water quality while addressing drought impacts.
Shoshone Hydroelectric Plant back in the days before I-70 via Aspen Journalism
  • Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project: Up to $40 million:ย The funding would go toward the $99 million purchase of theย Shoshone Power Plantโ€™s water rightsย by the Colorado River Water Conservation District. The district says it will protect future water supplies for ecosystems, farms, ranches, communities and recreational businesses.
The Dolores River shows us whatโ€™s at stake in the fight to protect the American West — Conservation Colorado
  • Addressing Drought Mitigation in Southwestern Colorado: Up to $25.6 million:ย The funding would support 17 projects in the Dolores and San Juan river basins in southwestern Colorado. The projects aim to restore ecosystems and enhance biodiversity and water resources while supporting local communities and endangered species.
Tomichi Creek, a tributary of the Gunnison River, runs through the Peterson Ranch property. The Colorado Water Conservation Board holds an instream flow water right for 18 cfs on the creek in this stretch. CREDIT: HEATHER SACKETT/ASPEN JOURNALISM
  • Grand Mesa and Upper Gunnison Watershed Resiliency and Aquatic Connectivity Project: Up to $24.3 million:ย The funding would restore watersheds to combat drought impacts to water quality and habitat in western Colorado.
Orchard Mesa circa 1911
  • Orchard Mesa Irrigation District Conveyance Upgrades for 15-Mile Reach Flow Enhancement: Up to $10.5 million:ย The funding would convert open canals into pressurized pipelines, improving water delivery efficiency and reducing environmental stressors. This upgrade aims to support endangered fish species by enhancing streamflow in a critical stretch of the Colorado River.
A man fishes along Blue River. The federal government Dec. 19, 2023, announced a $1.8 million grant for a habitat restoration on a section of the Blue River. Blue River Watershed Group/Courtesy photo
  • Enhancing Aquatic Habitat in Colorado River Headwaters: Up to $7 million:ย The funding would restore streamย habitats along the Fraser,ย Blue and Colorado rivers in Grand County through channel shaping and bank stabilization.
Coyote Gulch on the Yampa River Core Trail August 24, 2022.
  • Yampa River/Walton Creek Confluence Restoration Project: Up to $5 million:ย The funding would restore river and floodplain habitat around Steamboat Springs.
Yellow-billed cuckoos have nearly been extirpated from the western U.S. Photo courtesy Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory.
  • Drought Resiliency on Western Colorado Conserved Lands: Up to $4.6 million:ย The funding would help improve wetlands, floodplains, erosion control structures and habitat for at-risk species like the yellow-billed cuckoo and Gunnison sage-grouse.
The Colorado River, which feeds into Lake Powell, begins its 1,450-mile journey in Rocky Mountain National Park near Grand Lake, Colorado. Denver Water gets half of its water from tributaries that feed into the Colorado River. Some of these tributaries include the Fraser River in Grand County and the Blue River in Summit County. Photo credit: Denver Water
  • Upper Colorado Basin Aquatic Organism Passage Program: Up to $4.2 million:ย The funding would restore stream habitat in Grand County to improve biodiversity, habitats, fish passage and drought resilience.
Palisade peach orchard
  • Conversion of Wastewater Lagoons into Wetlands: Up to $3 million:ย The funding would turn outdated sewer lagoons intoย wetlands to improve biodiversityย and habitat for migratory waterfowl and endangered fish species in Palisade.
Fruita Reservoir #2 Dam Removal & Comprehensive Environmental Restoration. Photo credit: SGM
  • Fruita Reservoir Dam Removal: Up to $2.8 million:ย The funding would remove a dam on Piรฑon Mesa to restore wetlands, habitat and biodiversity.
Beaver dam analog. Photo: Juliet Grable
  • Monitoring and Quantifying the Effectiveness of Beaver Dam Analogs on Drought Influenced Streams in the Upper Colorado River Basin: Up to $1.9 million:ย The funding would restore degraded headwater meadows by implementing structures that mimic theย natural functions of beaver dams.
Uncompahgre River Valley looking south
  • Uncompahgre Tailwater Rehabilitation Project: Up to $1.8 million:ย The funding would stabilize stream banks, restore aging infrastructure and improve the river habitat to help with ecological health and recreational opportunities.
Photo credit: Town of Gypsum
  • Eagle River Habitat Improvement, Gypsum Ponds State Wildlife Area: Up to $1.5 million:ย The funding would improve fish habitat and water quality along the Eagle River in Eagle County.
Bicycling the Colorado National Monument, Grand Valley in the distance via Colorado.com
  • Orchard Mesa and Grand Valley Metering Efficiency Project: Up to $1.5 million:ย The funding would improve water management in the Grand Valley through the installation of advanced metering technology and real-time remote monitoring systems.
Biologists say federal target numbers are too low to ensure recovery of the Gunnison sage-grouse, which is listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. The bird’s largest population is in the Gunnison basin. Photo credit: Colorado Parks and Wildlife.
  • Habitat Restoration in the Gunnison Basin: Up to $750,000:ย ย The funding would use low-tech restoration structures to restore habitat for the endangeredย Gunnison sage-grouseย in the Gunnison River Basin.
Toxic-algae blooms appeared in Steamboat Lake summer of 2020. The lake shut down for two weeks after harmful levels of a toxin produced by the blue-green algae were found in the water. As climate change continues, toxic blooms and summer shutdowns of lakes are predicted to become more common. Photo credit: Julie Arington/Aspen Journalism
  • Cyanobacteria Monitoring and Treatment for Drought-driven Blooms in a High Elevation, Upper Colorado Reservoir to save Ecosystem Function: Up to $518,000:ย The funding would use real-time water quality monitoring tools and targeted treatments toย combat algal bloomsย and restore aquatic health at Williams Fork Reservoir.

More by Shannon Mullane

The Bureau of Reclamation has scheduled an increase in the release from Navajo Dam from 350 cubic feet per second (cfs) to 400 cfs for Friday, January 24th, at 4:00 AM.ย #SanJuanRiver #ColoradoRiver

Since the late 1980’s, this waterfall formed from interactions among Lake Powell reservoir levels and sedimentation that redirected the San Juan River over a 20-foot high sandstone ledge [Dominy Formation]. Until recently, little was known about its effect on two endangered fishes. Between 2015-2017, more than 1,000 razorback sucker and dozens of Colorado pikeminnow were detected downstream of the waterfall. Credit: Bureau of Reclamation

From email from Reclamation (Western Colorado Area Office):

Releases are made for the authorized purposes of the Navajo Unit, and to attempt to maintain a target base flow through the endangered fish critical habitat reach of the San Juan River (Farmington to Lake Powell).  The San Juan River Basin Recovery Implementation Program recommends a target base flow of between 500 cfs and 1,000 cfs through the critical habitat area.  The target base flow is calculated as the weekly average of gaged flows throughout the critical habitat area from Farmington to Lake Powell. 

Harriet Crittenden LaMair to Step Down as CEO of High Line Canal Conservancy After More Than a Decade of Transformational Leadership

High Line Canal Conservancy Board Chair, Paula Herzmark, and CEO, Harriet Crittenden LaMair. Photo by Evan Semรณn Photography 720-620-6767

Click the link to read the release on the High Line Canal Conservancy website (Suzanna Fry Jones):

DENVER, CO โ€“ January 23, 2025 โ€“ The High Line Canal Conservancy announced today that Harriet Crittenden LaMair, the organizationโ€™s founding CEO, will step down after 11 years of visionary leadership. Harriet will remain in her role until mid-2025 to ensure a seamless transition as the Conservancy begins its next chapter.

โ€œThe preservation and protection of the High Line Canal have been my passion for the past 11 years,โ€ said LaMair. โ€œIt has been an honor and joy to work with so many friends and partners to secure a vital future for the old Canal. Given the Canal safeguards that we have put in place, I am confident this is the right time to step away from leading the Conservancy. Together with Denver Water, local governments and private support, we have permanently protected the Canal under a conservation easement, improved community access and safety and established a strong stewardship endowment, forever ensuring improved care along all 71 miles,โ€ said LaMair.

LaMairโ€™s impact is significant, having spearheaded the creation of the High Line Canal Conservancy in 2014, transforming it from a startup nonprofit into a trusted regional leader. Under LaMairโ€™s leadership, the Conservancy has achieved historic milestones: securing over $33 million in private investment matched by public funds for more than $100 million in Canal improvements, establishing a Canal Collaborative that unites 14 jurisdictions, launching impactful community programs and protecting the Canal with a conservation easement.

High Line hero in action! Harriet Crittenden LaMair rallies the team and community to protect and celebrate the 71-mile treasure during an event along the trail in Aurora. Photo by Evan Semรณn Photography

โ€œHarriet has been a trusted leader and champion for the Canal over the years and has set us up for success,โ€ said Arapahoe County Commissioner Carrie Warren-Gully. โ€œWe would not be where we are today without her tenacity, vision and commitment to the long-term protection and stewardship of the Canal. She is leaving a lasting legacy and big shoes to fill โ€” and a collective awareness that we all have a responsibility to care for this regional treasure now and forever.โ€

LaMairโ€™s contributions have garnered regional and national acclaim, including the 2017 Jane Silverman Ries Award and the 2022 Denver Regional Council of Governments Metro Vision Award.

โ€œHarrietโ€™s leadership has been nothing short of transformative, shaping the High Line Canal Conservancy into a trusted and respected regional leader,โ€ said Alan Salazar, CEO of Denver Water. โ€œHer unwavering passion for the natural world and her exceptional ability to bring people together have united communities and organizations around a shared vision for the Canalโ€™s future. Denver Water is proud to have partnered with Harriet and the Conservancy in this remarkable journey, and her legacy will undoubtedly inspire continued stewardship and collaboration for generations to come.โ€

Paula Herzmark, Chair of the High Line Canal Conservancy Board, credited LaMair with being the driving force behind the Conservancyโ€™s success: โ€œThrough her vision and determination, she not only built an organization but also inspired a regional movement that will benefit communities for generations. We owe her an incredible debt of gratitude for her leadership and passion for this remarkable resource.โ€

As the Conservancy moves forward, it remains steadfast in its mission to preserve and enhance the 71-mile High Line Canal. Over the next three years, the organization will implement more than 30 improvement projects, expand community programs and advance natural resource management initiatives. Herzmark reiterated the Boardโ€™s commitment to building on LaMairโ€™s legacy, stating, โ€œAs Harriet transitions from her role, we remain committed to carrying forward the legacy she created.โ€

The Conservancyโ€™s Board is actively preparing for this leadership transition and is committed to identifying a new CEO who will continue advancing the Conservancyโ€™s mission and vision. More information about the job posting will be shared in the coming weeks. In the meantime, interested parties can contact employment@highlinecanal.org for inquiries.

About the High Line Canal Conservancy
The High Line Canal Conservancy is a nonprofit dedicated to preserving, protecting and enhancing the 71-mile High Line Canal. Since its founding in 2014, the Conservancy has led a regional effort to ensure the Canal remains a vibrant and enduring resource. Learn more atย HighLineCanal.org.

The High Line Canal Collaborative celebrates a historic moment, marking the land transfer of a portion of the Canal from Denver Water to Arapahoe County. Left to Right: Harriet Crittenden LaMair (High Line Canal Conservancy), Paula Herzmark (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Dessa Bokides (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Amy Heidema (Denver Water), Mark Bernstein (Denver Parks and Recreation), Diana Romero Campbell (Denver City Council), Tom Roode (Denver Water), Alan Salazar (Denver Water), Jim Lochhead (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Steve Coffin (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Laura Kroeger (Mile High Flood District), Lora Thomas (Douglas County Commission), Evan Ela (High Line Canal Conservancy Board of Directors), Melissa Reese-Thacker (South Suburban Parks and Recreation), Dan Olsen (Southeast Metro Stormwater Authority), Pam Eller (South Suburban Parks and Recreation Board of Directors), Earl Hoellen (Cherry Hills Village City Council), Jeff Baker (Arapahoe County Commission), Leslie Summey (Arapahoe County Commission), Shannon Carter (Retired – Arapahoe County Open Spaces), Bill Holen (Arapahoe County Commission), Carrie Warren-Gully (Arapahoe County Commission), Gretchen Rydin (Littleton City Council), Gini Pingenot (Arapahoe County Open Spaces), Amy Wiedeman (City of Centennial), Suzanne Moore (City of Greenwood Village), Brian Green (Aurora Parks, Recreation and Open Space), Nicole Ankeney (Aurora Parks, Recreation and Open Space). Photo by Evan Semรณn Photography

#Drought news January 23, 2025: The recent snows in the Rocky Mountains allowed for some drought intensity reductions in northern #Colorado and with western and north central #Wyoming. Colorado had moderate drought expand in the south.

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

Almost all the U.S. experienced a cooler-than-normal week, with only a handful of areas being above normal. The coolest readings were in the Rocky Mountains, where departures were up to 15 degrees below normal, while the warmest areas were in central and northern California, New England, and south Florida, where departures were a few degrees above normal. Precipitation was also greatest in the Rocky Mountains where the upper elevations recorded a good week of snow. Precipitation was widely scattered throughout the Southeast where some portions of north Florida had over 200% of normal precipitation for the week. At the end of the period, a cold air mass settled in over the eastern two-thirds of the country, bringing cold air all the way down into the deep South with winter storms along the Gulf Coast. There are multiple regions that have had several weeks of dryness with minimal precipitation. Even though it is winter, and drought tends to move slower due to reduction of demand, these areas will continue to be monitored for degradation if the pattern continues and the data support it…

High Plains

Some of the coldest air of the year settled into the region over the last week. Departures from normal temperatures were 12-15 degrees below normal in portions of Wyoming, South Dakota, and Colorado, and into Kansas and Nebraska. Dry conditions dominated the region with only portions of southwest Kansas and the Plains of Wyoming and Colorado recording precipitation. December and January are the driest months of the year and deficits are accumulating with little to no precipitation over the last several weeks. Conditions will continue to be monitored for further degradation in the region…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 21, 2025.

West

It was a dry week for most of the region outside of the accumulated snow in the Rocky Mountains and into northern New Mexico. Temperatures were mainly cooler than normal over the region, with portions of the Rocky Mountains 12-15 degrees below normal for the week. Portions of northern and central California were near normal to slightly above normal for temperatures this week. The abysmal start to the water year continues over much of southern California, southern Nevada and Utah, and into Arizona and New Mexico. Most of the managed water systems are fine in the region after two consecutive wet winters, but the short-term drought indicators for the current water year are highlighting the significant short-term drought in the Southwest into southern California. Degradation to drought status continued this week with drought expanding and intensifying over much of southern California. Abnormally dry conditions expanded over much of western New Mexico and northeastern Arizona, with extreme drought expanding over western Arizona and severe drought expanding over southwest Utah. The recent wet pattern was enough to remove the remaining abnormally dry conditions out of central Oregon while the recent snows in the Rocky Mountains allowed for some drought intensity reductions in northern Colorado and with western and north central Wyoming. Colorado had moderate drought expand in the south, with a new pocket of abnormally dry conditions added in the Southwest…

South

Temperatures were cooler than normal for the region this week with most areas 5-10 degrees below normal. It was mostly a dry week throughout the region with only areas of southern Texas recording above-normal precipitation. Some areas are pushing 60 or more days without any significant precipitation in portions of Oklahoma and Texas, but as it is climatologically the driest time of the year for some of these areas, drought degradation has been slow. Changes this week included an expansion of abnormally dry conditions over extreme northwest Arkansas and central Texas. Moderate drought also expanded over portions of central Texas due to reports of crop losses due to lack of soil moisture in the region. Extreme drought expanded along the Big Bend of Texas where hydrological indicators are supporting the expansion. Some improvements to the severe and extreme drought were made in middle Tennessee, but abnormally dry conditions were expanded in the southwest portion of the state…

Looking Ahead

Over the next five to seven days, it is anticipated that the greatest precipitation will be over the South into the Southeast from east Texas into western Alabama. Much of the country will see little to no precipitation with the most active precipitation areas from California into Wyoming and Montana, but amounts will generally be less than 1 inch for most locations. Temperatures are anticipated to be warmest over the central Plains to the upper Midwest with departures of 5-10 degrees above normal. The coolest temperatures will be in the west with most areas 5-10 degrees below normal.

The 6-10 day outlooks show that the probability of below-normal temperatures is greatest over the Southwest and in New England, while the greatest chances of above normal temperatures are over the High Plains and upper Midwest. Above-normal chances of above-normal precipitation are greatest over the southern United States from New Mexico into the Mid-Atlantic. The best chances of below normal precipitation are over the West and High Plains into the Midwest.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 21, 2025.

Release from the Friends of Canyon Creek (FriendsOfCanyonCreek.com): Oppose Nutrient Farms’ planned unit development at Garfield County Planning Commission on January 29th at 6 pm

At the confluence of Canyon Creek and the Colorado River. Photo credit: Friends of Canyon Creek

From email from the Friends of Canyon Creek (Chuck Montera):

January 22, 2025

Members of the coalition Friends of Canyon Creek are in opposition to a planned unit development (PUD) that is set for a hearing before Garfield County Planning Commission on Wednesday, January 29 at 6 pm. Approval of the Nutrient Farms PUD would have a devastating effect to Canyon Creek and the surrounding community. Friends of Canyon Creek, comprised of citizens, water rights holders, landowners and environmental interests, oppose this PUD because of its source of water โ€“ a new draw out of Canyon Creek.ย 

The Nutrient Farms PUD would divert nearly 9 cubic feet per second (cfs) of water (approximately 5 million gallons per day) from Canyon Creek, year-round, about 1.5 miles north of its confluence with the Colorado River. This water would be piped through the old Vulcan Ditch, through AVLT conservation easements, across dangerous and unstable hillside that burned and slid during the 2007 fire, under 6&24, and under I-70 and the railroad before even crossing the Colorado River to the south side. This is why the old Vulcan Ditch hasnโ€™t carried water nor been maintained to cross the Colorado in decades; it’s unstable, dangerous and inefficient.

Friends of Canyon Creek formed to protect this watershed and ensure it flows for future generations. 

We are opposed to the PUD as written for the following reasons:

  1. Drying up the creek would have significant environmental consequences, including harming local trout populations and destroying riparian ecosystems.
  2. FOCCโ€™s legal counsel believes Nutrient Farms has no legal right to divert Canyon Creek. This issue is currently before the Colorado Water Court.
  3. Last and perhaps most important, drying up Canyon Creek would hinder firefighting efforts and heighten risks for local property owners.

Nutrient Farms has the legal right to divert its water directly from the Colorado River, completely avoiding harm to Canyon Creek. They claim Colorado River is not high enough in quality to water crops. This is counter to the fact the Colorado River provides water to 40+ million people and irrigates 5.5 million acres of crops.

Our group does not oppose a new local farm, we oppose killing a creek to irrigate that farm.

We encourage concerned citizens to contact the Garfield County Planning Commission and BOCC and voice your opinions about this PUD. There will be a public comment period during the meeting if you want to speak out. For more information go to https://friendsofcanyoncreek.com.

The American Oil Industryโ€™s Playbook, Illustrated: How Drillers Offload Costly Cleanup Onto the Public — Mark Olalde, illustrations by Peter Arkle (ProPublica.org) #ActOnClimate

Abandoned gas well located in Lower Rio Grande Valley National Wildlife Refuge. By Hillebrand, Steve, USFWS – https://digitalmedia.fws.gov/digital/collection/natdiglib/id/13540/rec/9, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=113189594

Click the link to read the article on the ProPublica website:

by Mark Olalde, illustrations by Peter Arkle, special to ProPublica

December 30, 2024

ProPublica is a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative newsroom. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox.

Series: Unplugged:Will Taxpayers Foot the Oil Industryโ€™s Cleanup Bill?

More in this series

In December 1990, officials in the federal agency tasked with regulating offshore oil and gas drilling received a memo with a dire warning: America faced a ticking time bomb of environmental liability from unplugged oil and gas wells, wrote the agencyโ€™s chief of staff. Those wells and their costly cleanup obligations were being concentrated in the hands of cash-strapped drillers at the same time as production was shrinking. (The document, unearthed by public interest watchdog organization Documented, was shared with ProPublica and Capital & Main.)

More than three decades later, little action has been taken to heed that warning, and the time bomb is threatening to explode.

More than 2 million oil and gas wells sit unplugged across the country. Many leak contaminants like brine, methane and benzene into waterways, farmland and neighborhoods. The industry has already left hundreds of thousands of old wells as orphans, meaning companies walked away, leaving taxpayers, government agencies or other drillers on the hook for cleanup.

Americaโ€™s oil fields are increasingly split between a small number of wells producing record profits and everything else. Researchers estimate roughly 90% of wells are already dead or barely producing.

Consider the Permian Basin, the worldโ€™s most productive oil field, stretching from West Texas across southeastern New Mexico.

โ€œThe Permian is the oil patchโ€™s Alamo โ€” thatโ€™s where itโ€™s retreating to,โ€ Regan Boychuk, a Canadian oil cleanup researcher, said of the oil industry. โ€œThatโ€™s their last stand.โ€

Even here, many wells sit idle and in disrepair. Itโ€™s time to plug them, according to a growing chorus of researchers, environmentalists and industry representatives.

The question of who pays for cleanup remains unanswered. Time and again, oil companies have offloaded their oldest wells. Their tactics are not written down in one place or peddled by a single law firm โ€” but companies follow an unmistakable pattern. The strategy, which is legal if followed properly, has become such a tried-and-true endeavor that researchers and environmentalists dubbed it โ€œthe playbook.โ€

Clark Williams-Derry, an analyst with clean-energy-focused think tank the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, studies fossil fuel companiesโ€™ cleanup costs. โ€œThereโ€™s almost a cheerleading squad for shedding your liabilities, like a snake sheds its skin and just slithers away,โ€ he said.

Should you want to become an oil executive and try this strategy yourself, hereโ€™s how it works โ€ฆ

As you launch your business, begin by collecting subsidies, tax breaks and other incentives from the government to guarantee you can pump oil and gas profitably. Globally, fossil fuel subsidies total in the trillions each year, according to organizations such as the International Monetary Fund.

Next, start pumping and profiting.

As you set up your business, create layers of shell companies. Down the road, theyโ€™ll provide a firewall between you and your liabilities โ€” key among them, cleanup costs.

Once oil and gas production slows, sell low-producing wells. Smaller drillers operating on thinner margins, known in the business as โ€œscavenger companies,โ€ will be happy to take them off your hands.

Rinse and repeat by selling wells as their profits slow to a trickle. Theyโ€™ll be sold again to ever-smaller companies that teeter on the edge of insolvency. Maintenance and environmental stewardship will usually fall by the wayside as companies eke out a profit. Studies show that the number of environmental violations rises as wells pass to less-capitalized drillers. But these wells arenโ€™t your problem any longer.

Pull any remaining profits before regulators hit you with violations and fines for your remaining wells that arenโ€™t pumping and may be leaking.

Then, idle the wells โ€” pausing production, but not plugging them or cleaning up โ€” and walk away. Regulators are typically tasked with ensuring that as much oil as possible is pumped out of the ground, so rules allow wells to sit idle, instead of being plugged, in case prices surge and it becomes profitable to restart them. However, a study in California found that, after wells are inactive for only 10 months, thereโ€™s a 50-50 chance they will never produce again.

Regulators will likely grow tired of asking you to clean up your wells, but you can make the case for leaving them unplugged for now. Pitch grand plans, as other drillers have โ€” maybe repurposing the wells for bitcoin mining, carbon sequestration or the synthesis of hydrogen fuel โ€” that require the wells to remain open.

When regulatorsโ€™ patience has reached its limit, remind them what will happen if they come down hard on you. Fines or other extra costs could force your business into bankruptcy, leaving your unplugged wells as orphans and taxpayers on the hook. Ask them if they want to be responsible for that catastrophe.

โ€œThe root of the problem is thereโ€™s no regulator of the oil industry across North America,โ€ Boychuk said, adding that โ€œthe rule of law has never applied to oil and gas.โ€

When regulators finally act, declare bankruptcy. The Bankruptcy Code is meant to protect businesspeople like you who took risks. More than 250 oil and gas operators in the U.S. filed for bankruptcy protection between 2015 and 2021, according to law firm Haynes Boone. (Industry groups estimate there are several thousand oil companies in the country.)

Regulators only require oil and gas companies to set aside tiny bonds that act like a security deposit on an apartment. Because you didnโ€™t clean up your wells, youโ€™ll lose that money, but itโ€™s a fraction of the profits youโ€™ve banked or the cost of the cleanup work. ProPublica and Capital & Main found that bonds typically equal less than 2% of actual cleanup costs.

And as you finalize your exit, the labyrinth of shell corporations you set up should act as corporate law intends, protecting you from future responsibility. Such companies, little more than stacks of paper, will be responsible for your liabilities, not you. Even if regulators know who is behind a company, it becomes increasingly difficult to penetrate each layer of a business to go after individual executives.

โ€œItโ€™s the essence of corporate law,โ€ Williams-Derry said.

Now that youโ€™ve offloaded your wells, youโ€™re free to start fresh โ€” launch a new oil company and buy some of your old wells for pennies on the dollar, a proven option. Maybe you leave oil entirely โ€” thatโ€™s also tried-and-true. Or become a vintner and open a winery just down the road from the wells you left as orphans โ€” you wouldnโ€™t be the first.

For its part, the oil industry downplays the so-called playbook and the countryโ€™s orphan well epidemic. โ€œThereโ€™s a general trend, which is there are very few orphan wells,โ€ said Kathleen Sgamma, who has been among oil companiesโ€™ most vocal proponents as president of the Western Energy Alliance, an industry trade group. Plus, she said, companiesโ€™ bonds and statesโ€™ orphan well funds help pay for plugging.

But those tasked with addressing the reality of the countryโ€™s orphan wells disagree. โ€œWe have a welfare system for oil and gas. I hope you understand that,โ€ said New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands Stephanie Garcia Richard, who oversees the stateโ€™s public lands. New Mexico has already documented more than 1,700 orphan wells across the state. โ€œWe have oil and gas welfare queens.โ€

In New Mexico, Garcia Richard is trying to hold accountable one of the myriad drillers that have followed key steps in the playbook, the oil company known as Siana.

Siana is made up of two related entities โ€” Siana Oil and Gas Co. LLC and Siana Operating LLC โ€” based in Midland and Conroe, Texas. The company operated 11 wells in southeastern New Mexico in the heart of the Permian Basin.

In reality, Siana is the corporate shield for a man named Tom Ragsdale. After he aggregated his few wells, he generated cash through a trickle of oil and gas production and set up a business injecting other companiesโ€™ wastewater into his wells to dispose of it. But the state worried that Ragsdaleโ€™s operations were polluting the environment and that he was refusing to pay royalties and rental fees he owed the state, according to State Land Office staff.

Ragsdale did not respond to repeated requests for comment from ProPublica and Capital & Main. He also did not appear for a pretrial conference after the state brought legal action against Siana, court records show, and a state court judge ruled against his companies.

Siana was responsible for at least 16 spills, according to New Mexico Oil Conservation Division data, mainly spilling whatโ€™s called produced water, a briny wastewater that comes to the surface alongside oil and gas. โ€œCorrosionโ€ and โ€œEquipment Failureโ€ were among the causes.

The State Land Office hired an engineering firm to study the damage. The firm produced a damning 201-page report in 2018, finding oil and salt contamination exceeding state limits at Sianaโ€™s most polluted site. At high enough levels, these substances can kill plants, harm wildlife and impact human health.

The State Land Office estimated that cleaning up that site alone would cost about $1 million.

In 2020, New Mexico won a judgment against Ragsdaleโ€™s companies that, with interest, is now worth more than $3.5 million. But it wonโ€™t cover the cleanup cost. Between a small bond and the judgment, the state has been able to recover a mere $50,000 or so from Siana and related entities.

When the state tried to collect the rest, Ragsdale placed Siana Oil and Gas in bankruptcy protection in June 2023. Although he listed the company as having millions in assets at the time of the bankruptcy, the company had only $20,500 in a bank account. Court records show Siana is responsible for between $1 million and $10 million in liabilities, including money owed to the state of New Mexico, other oil companies, various counties and others.

Stickers plastered around Sianaโ€™s drill sites โ€” on which the companyโ€™s name is misspelled โ€” provide phone numbers to call in case of leaks or other emergencies. None went to Ragsdale or Siana employees. A man named William Dean answered one number. He owned a local oil field services company called Deanโ€™s Pumping that was contracted to work on Sianaโ€™s wells, but Ragsdale stopped paying its bills, ultimately owing his company tens of thousands of dollars, Dean said.

โ€œHe was trying to half-ass things,โ€ Dean said of Ragsdale. โ€œI donโ€™t know what happened to Tom.โ€

Sianaโ€™s bankruptcy case is ongoing, but Ragsdale has been largely unresponsive even in those proceedings.

Siana is, Garcia Richard said, โ€œan exemplar of how our system has failed.โ€ Although he was very nearly free of his old wells, Ragsdale flouted the playbook and ignored the bankruptcy judgeโ€™s demands that he participate in the case. In an unusual move, the judge in late September issued a warrant for Ragsdaleโ€™s arrest to compel him to hand over certain data. The U.S. Marshals Service was investigating Ragsdaleโ€™s whereabouts but had not taken him into custody as of mid-December, according to an agency representative.

The day after the judge issued the arrest warrant, the bankruptcy trustee filed a complaint alleging Ragsdale had committed fraud, siphoning about $2.4 million from Siana to purchase real estate in Houston.

That money could have gone toward cleaning up the mess left to New Mexico taxpayers.

ProPublica and Capital & Main visited Sianaโ€™s 11 wells in late 2023. At one drill site, methane leaked from a wellhead that had also stained the surrounding land black from spilled oil. The air was sour with the smell of toxic hydrogen sulfide. A nearby tank that held oil for processing was rusted through. Another had leaked an unidentified liquid. There appeared to be hoofprints where cattle had tracked through the polluted mud.

ProPublica and Capital & Main found oil spills at multiple Siana wells. At others, the idle pump jacks stood silent โ€” corroded skeletons at the end of the line, the detritus of another run through the playbook.

Efforts to reform the system that has shielded oil companies from liability have been haphazard. When the federal government rewrote its rule setting bond levels on federal public land earlier this year, a simple math error meant the government would ask oil companies to set aside around $400 million less in bonds than it wouldโ€™ve otherwise. And when states have tried to pass reforms, theyโ€™ve been stymied by state legislatorsโ€™ and regulatorsโ€™ chummy relationships with the industry.

As an ever-greater share of wells go offline and the economy transitions to cleaner forms of energy, policymakers face a choice: Do they focus attention on propping up or cleaning up the industry?

Sgamma of the Western Energy Alliance gives voice to one path forward. โ€œAny time a well goes into an orphan status, itโ€™s not a good thing,โ€ Sgamma said, yet her group has been instrumental in killing efforts to address the orphan well epidemic and the oil industryโ€™s contributions to climate change. Her organization is suing to halt the federal rule that sought to bring bonding levels closer to true plugging costs.

Sgamma co-authored the energy section of Project 2025, the conservative policy paper with deep ties to the first Trump administration that lays out policy priorities for a conservative White House. The plan would โ€œStop the war on oil and natural gas,โ€ reopen undeveloped habitat from Alaska to Colorado for drilling, increase the number of sales for oil leases on public lands and shrink federal environmental agencies. President-elect Donald Trump has repeatedly indicated this closely aligns with his vision for pumping Americaโ€™s โ€œliquid gold.โ€ He has begun staffing his administration with pro-oil and gas figures.

The future for which Sgamma is fighting sees a resilient American oil and gas industry, able to โ€œtake a lot of punchesโ€ while continuing to grow unabated.

Or thereโ€™s the future Garcia Richard, who oversees New Mexicoโ€™s public land, envisions. She has paused the leasing of public land to drillers until the Legislature forces oil companies to pay state taxpayers higher royalties that reflect fair market rates. She directed her staff to aggressively pursue companies like Siana. And her office is preparing to raise required bonding levels. As she talked about this work, she held up the literal rubber stamp that imparts the State Land Officeโ€™s seal on documents, suggesting thatโ€™s not how business is done anymore. She also held up a small notebook where she tracks the numerous companies her office is pursuing for polluting the stateโ€™s land and water.

In her future, Garcia Richard said, oil drillers wouldnโ€™t behave like Siana and Ragsdale. โ€œA good-acting company is a company that understands thereโ€™s a cost of doing business that shouldnโ€™t be borne by the landowner, shouldnโ€™t be borne by the taxpayers,โ€ she said. But in the modern American oil industry, she added, the playbook and the still-burning fuse of the cleanup time bomb represent little more than โ€œWild West behavior.โ€

Snow scientists say cloud seeding has big potential — Alex Hager (KUNC.org)

Scenes from the Seeded and Natural Orographic Wintertime Clouds: The Idaho Experiment (SNOWIE) project, which was undertaken in Idahoโ€™s Payette Basin in winter 2017. Credit: Joshua Aikins via Aspen Journalism

Click the link to read the article on the KUNC website (Alex Hager):

January 20, 2025

This story is part of ongoing coverage of the Colorado River, produced by KUNC in Colorado and supported by the Walton Family Foundation. KUNC is solely responsible for its editorial coverage.

It sounds like science fiction, but humans have the power to change the weather. What they donโ€™t have, though, is enough data about how well it works.

Thatโ€™s according to a new study from the Government Accountability Office, which recently released a report on cloud seeding โ€“ a technology that adds chemical compounds to existing clouds and can cause them to drop more rain or snow.

Cloud seeding can seem like an obvious solution for the drought-stricken Colorado River Basin, which gets most of its water from Rocky Mountain snowmelt and has seen a downward trend in annual supplies. Historically, policymakers have been slow to embrace the technology, choosing to focus more money and energy on reducing water demand rather than increasing water supply. Meanwhile, advocates for the practice say increased cloud seeding makes sense now.

The GAOโ€™s study says reliable information on the effectiveness of cloud seeding could be standing in the way of a broader rollout, because policymakers donโ€™t currently know if itโ€™s worth the money.

โ€œThe people in charge of making those decisions have to consider return on investment,โ€ said Karen Howard, the GAOโ€™s director of science, technology assessment, and analytics. โ€œWhen it’s not entirely clear what the effectiveness is, I think those decisions can be difficult to make.โ€

The GAO report identified a few other obstacles besides the limited data.

One of the most common methods of cloud seeding involves the addition of silver iodide to clouds. That chemical compound is considered safe, but the report says more testing is needed to make sure itโ€™s still safe when applied across wider areas.

In its current capacity, Howard said, cloud seeding work could be useful to add more snow to an individual ski resort, but those efforts would need to get a lot bigger to make a significant impact on the amount of snowmelt that feeds major Western rivers.

โ€œAlmost all cloud seeding is very local in nature,โ€ she said. โ€œSo you would need a lot of seeding operations in order to cover an entire mountain range.โ€

Snowy mountains loom over Colorado’s Lake Dillon reservoir on April 22, 2024. The Colorado River system gets the vast majority of its water from mountain snowmelt, so water managers eagerly watch high-altitude weather to build forecasts for water supply. Alex Hager/KUNC

Meanwhile, on the ground in Colorado, one of the stateโ€™s foremost cloud seeding experts says more funding is needed to expand the stateโ€™s work.

โ€œAbsolutely, I’m confident that it’s effective,โ€ said Andrew Rickert, manager of the Colorado Water Conservation Boardโ€™s weather modification program. โ€œThat doesn’t mean that we can’t make it better.โ€

Rickert said he works with a roughly $1.5 million budget. That is relatively modest in comparison to the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on developing other solutions to the Colorado Riverโ€™s supply-demand imbalance โ€“ such as paying farmers to use less water on their crops or developing technology that can recycle sewage back into drinking water. He also pointed to other state and private programs around the region that are quietly making advances to cloud seeding technology.

โ€œWe have the data that cloud seeding works,โ€ he said. โ€œWe’ve been doing it since the early 1950s. I wish we had more funding to throw behind this.โ€

Cloud-seeding graphic via Science Matters

So, if the technology is effective and government agencies are spending billions to try and solve the Colorado River Crisis, why arenโ€™t they doing more to boost cloud seeding?

โ€œThe problem is levels of magnitude above what any weather modification can fix,โ€ said Amy Ostdiek, chief of the interstate, federal and water information section at the Colorado Water Conservation Board.

Ostdiek said cloud seeding is โ€œone of the tools in the toolkitโ€ for Colorado and other states dealing with dry conditions, and emphasized the importance of reining in water demand.

โ€œWe know [cloud seeding] is not going to solve all of the basinโ€™s problems, but we know that it works for a limited purpose,โ€ she said. โ€œSo it’s not as controversial or as sexy as all the other things going on in the basin. That doesn’t mean it doesn’t work, it’s just kind of chugging along.โ€

Rickert, who directs Coloradoโ€™s cloud seeding program, thinks itโ€™s worth big investment even as policymakers focus on demand reductions.

โ€œYou have people like Elon Musk trying to get us to Mars, but you know, why wouldnโ€™t he put serious money behind cloud seeding?โ€ Rickert said. โ€œYou have like representative Marjorie Taylor Greene spouting all this stuff about geoengineering. Let’s put some real science and money behind this and show people that we can increase our water in a safe and efficient manner.โ€

Scenes from the Seeded and Natural Orographic Wintertime Clouds: The Idaho Experiment (SNOWIE) project, which was undertaken in Idahoโ€™s Payette Basin in winter 2017. Credit: Joshua Aikins via Aspen Journalism

Alternatives Report: Post-2026 Operational Guidelines and Strategies for #LakePowell and #LakeMead — Reclamation

Click the link to access the report. Here’s the executive summary:

January 2025

In December 2007 the Secretary of the Interior adopted coordinated operating guidelines for operation of Glen Canyon Dam and Hoover Dam for an interim period that expires in 2026.To address long-term Colorado River operations after the expiration of these guidelines, the United States Department of the Interior initiated a National Environmental Policy Act process on June 16, 2023, to develop and adopt successor domestic guidelines and agreements for the operation of Glen Canyon Dam and Hoover Dam to take effect in mid-2026, before the current operational framework expires. On November 20, 2024, the Bureau of Reclamation published the range of alternatives planned for analysis in the draft environmental impact statement and committed to providing additional information in a subsequent report. This report describes these alternatives and the process for developing them in more detail.

The alternatives were developed over the past year and incorporate considerable input received from the Colorado River Basin States, Colorado River Basin Tribes, conservation organizations, other federal agencies, and other stakeholders during that time. Throughout 2024, the Bureau of Reclamation worked extensively with these key partners to integrate their input into the range of alternatives. The alternatives identified in this report provide a reasonable and broad range of Colorado River operations that capture an appropriate range of potential environmental impacts from implementing new operational guidelines post-2026.

The five alternatives described in detail in this report are:

Udall/Overpeck 4-panel Figure Colorado River temperature/precipitation/natural flows with trend. Lake Mead and Lake Powell storage. Updated through Water Year 2024. Credit: Brad Udall

No Action Alternative โ€“ Included as a requirement of the National Environmental Policy Act, the No Action Alternative assumes Colorado River operations would revert to annual determinations announced through the Annual Operating Plan for Colorado River Reservoirs process and be based on operating guidance in place prior to the adoption of the 2007 Colorado River Interim Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for Lake Powell and Lake Mead.

Federal Authorities Alternative โ€“ This alternative is designed to achieve protection of critical infrastructure within the Department of the Interiorโ€™s and Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s current statutory authorities and absent new stakeholder agreements.

Federal Authorities Hybrid Alternative โ€“ This alternative is based on proposals and concepts from Tribes, federal agencies, and other stakeholders and is designed to achieve protection of critical infrastructure while benefitting key resources through an approach to distributing storage between Lake Powell and Lake Mead that enhances the reservoirsโ€™ ability to support the Colorado River Basin.

Receding waters at Lone Rock in Lake Powell illustrate the impacts of megadrought. Hydroelectric generation will be endangered if the lake continues to shrink. Credit: Colorado State University

Cooperative Conservation Alternative โ€“ This alternative is informed by a proposal submitted by a consortium of conservation organizations with the goal of stabilizing system storage, integrating stewardship and mitigation strategies of Lake Powell and Lake Mead, maintaining opportunities for binational cooperative measures, incentivizing water conservation, and designing flexible water management strategies.

Hoover Dam with Lake Mead in the background December 3, 2024.

Basin Hybrid Alternative โ€“ This alternative reflects components of the proposals and concepts submitted by the Upper Division States, Lower Division States, and Colorado River Basin Tribes that could provide a basis for coordinated operations and may facilitate greater agreement across the Basin.

Releasing the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s intended approach to the alternatives in advance of publishing the draft environmental impact statement enhances transparency and public understanding of this important National Environmental Policy Act process and provides greater opportunities for collaboration. Information submitted following the November 20, 2024, publication of the range of alternatives has not been considered in this report. Following the publication of this report, the Bureau of Reclamation will continue its efforts working with Colorado River Basin partners and stakeholders and will analyze information submitted after November 20, 2024. The Bureau of Reclamation will also prepare the environmental impact analysis for the draft environmental impact statement.

Colorado River “Beginnings”. Photo: Brent Gardner-Smith/Aspen Journalism

Southwestern Water Conservation District awarded $25.6M grant: Money will fund projects supporting aquatic ecosystems during periods of #drought — The #Durango Herald

A headgate on an irrigation ditch on Maroon Creek, a tributary of the Roaring Fork River. Photo credit: Aspen Journalism/Brent Gardner-Smith

Click the link to read the article on The Durango Herald website (Jessica Bowman):

January 21, 2025

A news release from the SWCD said the funding will support 17 projects aimed at supporting aquatic ecosystems during periods of drought across the Dolores and San Juan River Basins in Southwest Colorado. General Manager of SWCD, Steve Wolff, said the projects will address three broad categories: the removal of invasive plants, erosion control and habitat connectivity…One example Wolff provided was the rebuilding of headgates โ€“ structures at the tops of stream diversions that regulate water flow โ€“ to allow fish to move upstream and downstream during periods of drought. The projects were selected on their feasibility, readiness and level of local engagement, and had the support of 37 different federal, state, tribal and local entities representing regional and local stakeholders.

In 2023, the SWCD board of directors organized a partnership of over 30 regional groups in preparation for the B2E grant application after recognizing the need for rural stakeholders in Southwest Colorado to compete more effectively for federal funding. Southwest Colorado has always needed a lot of funding; it has numerous small conservation districts, irrigation districts and conservation groups that individually lack the capacity to prepare applications for large federal grants, Wolff said. The final grant contract isnโ€™t expected to be executed until late 2025 or early 2026. All funding must be spent by Sept. 30, 2031.

San Juan River Basin. Graphic credit Wikipedia.
Dolores River watershed

The Donald Trump Burr Trail? Oy! Plus: More Biden public lands action; uranium mine safety violations — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org)

The Burr Trail as it approaches the western boundary of Capitol Reef National Park. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Click the link to read the article on the Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

January 17, 2024

๐Ÿคฏ Crazytown Chronicle ๐Ÿคก

You really canโ€™t make this stuff up: The Garfield County board of commissioners really wants to name a highway in their midst after President-elect Donald Trump. They will consider two options at their Jan. 27 meeting, with the first one being to change the โ€œBurr Trail Scenic Backwayโ€ to the โ€œDonald J. Trump Presidential Burr Trail Backway.โ€

Oy frigging vey.

The Burr Trail, which runs from Boulder, Utah, through Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, the Waterpocket Fold, and Capitol Reef National Park, ending up just outside Ticaboo, started out as a livestock trail in the 1880s and is named after rancher John Atlantic Burr. It is now not only a spectacularly scenic drive, but also one of the most controversial roads in the West.

Portions of the trail became a road in 1948, when the Atomic Energy Commission bulldozed the switchbacks through the Waterpocket Fold to provide motorized access to uranium mining claims. According to a National Park Service history, the road was widely used by uranium miners throughout the โ€˜50s and into the โ€˜60s. In 1967 the federal government funded improvements to the route as part of a project to provide road access to the new Bullfrog Marina on Lake Powell (which started filling up in 1963)

The Silver Bullet on the Burr Trail just above the switchbacks in Capitol Reef National Park. Jonathan P. Thompson photo.

Ever since, Garfield County has wanted to continue to improve the road and, ultimately, pave its entire 66 miles, thinking it would attract a more conventional, bigger-spending brand of tourists than the dirtbag backpackers that frequented the region in the 70s and 80s. The county was in tough shape economically, largely because market forces were crushing the uranium mining industry and small-scale ranching, and so it was looking to fill the void with tourism. In 1983, Wayne County Commissioner and paving advocate H. Dell LeFevre told the New York Times:

Coyote Gulch’s VW Bus South Park 1973.

Environmental groups and the National Park Service, however, have pushed back, saying paving the gravel, washboarded route would encroach on federal lands and increase access โ€” and impacts โ€” to the backcountry. Conservationists launched lawsuits countering county claims that it owns the road and should control how itโ€™s maintained.

The Burr Trail thus became yet another symbol in the long-running culture war over roads, federal land management, and an arcane federal mining law statute known as RS-2477.

In 1987, as an environmental lawsuit seeking to block blacktopping made its way through the courts, someone poured sugar into the fuel tanks of Garfield County bulldozers being used to work on the Trail, a la the Monkey Wrench Gang. A local uranium miner and founding member of what would become the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance was charged with the crime but acquitted.

Shortly thereafter, a district judge ruled against the environmentalists and allowed the BLM to greenlight Garfield Countyโ€™s bid to blacktop the section of road from Boulder to the western boundary of Capitol Reef National Park.

That didnโ€™t end the battle, however. Garfield County has continued its crusade to pave the remainder of the route, and the Burr Trail has been featured in many a court case. In 1996, the National Park Service dragged the county to court after its crews bulldozed a hill to fix a blind corner. And in 2019, Trumpโ€™s Bureau of Land Management permitted it to chip-seal a seven-mile section on the other side of Capitol Reef NP; the county carried out the work before environmentalists had a chance to challenge it. A judge ultimately let the asphalt remain.2

The Burr Trail, in other words, is almost as polarizing as a certain president-elect, which could be one reason a rural Utah county wants to rename the backroad after a Manhattan real estate baron and reality TV show host who has never set foot in that part of the world and sure as hell couldnโ€™t tell a juniper from a piรฑon tree even if a giant coyote whacked him over his orange head with it.

But Garfield County Commissioner Leland Pollack says he wants to rename the route to show his appreciation for Trumpโ€™s first-term policies, including shrinking Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, telling KSL: โ€œThis is just a sign of appreciation. This guy right here was good to Garfield County and he was good to all of the Western public land counties.โ€ Sure, Leland.

The Grand Staircase-Escalante Partners opposes the renaming, even going so far as to refuse to utter the proposed new name in its press release. The statement notes:

๐ŸŒต Public Lands ๐ŸŒฒ

In its waning days, the Biden administration has been quite active on the public lands front. In a future post Iโ€™ll get into Bidenโ€™s environmental legacy, but for now hereโ€™s a quick rundown of some of the administrationโ€™s latter-day moves:

  • Bidenโ€™s designation of the Chuckwalla National Monument in southern California adds another link to what is now being called the Moab to Mojave Conservation Corridor, a strip of protected lands that follows the Colorado River from southeastern Utah to the Mojave Desert. Prior to Chuckwalla, Biden bolstered the corridor by restoring Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments and by establishing the Baaj Nwaavjo Iโ€™tah Kukveni and Avi Kwa Ame national monuments.
Source: National Parks Conservation Association
  • The administration finalized the management plans for both Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears national monuments. Iโ€™m not going to give a full rundown on the plans here, because they are so similar to the draft plans, which I detailed in earlier dispatches (GSENM & Bears Ears). There are a few modifications, however. Perhaps most significant is that a ban on recreational shooting throughout Bears Ears was scaled back to apply only to campgrounds, developed recreation sites, rock writing sites, and structural cultural sites. Meanwhile, both plans, especially Bears Ears, take an overly laissez faire approach to livestock grazing, perpetuating impacts on ecological and cultural resources.
  • The federal Bureau of Land Management terminated Utahโ€™s right of way for a proposed four-lane highway across the Red Cliffs Conservation Area outside St. George. The state and Washington County have been trying for years to build the road in order to โ€œaccommodateโ€ the areaโ€™s breakneck growth. In 2020, the Trump administration finally issued a right of way, but conservationists sued and forced the BLM to reconsider. In December, the agency sided with the conservationists, revoking the right of way and suggesting St. George expand the existing Red Hills Parkway rather than build a new road through desert tortoise habitat.
  • The Interior Department launched the process of banning new mining claims and mineral leases on about 270,000 acres of federal land (plus an additional 40,000 acres of private land the feds hope to acquire) near Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge in Nevada. Conservationists had been looking to get added protections on the area after lithium mining and geothermal energy companies began eyeing it.

***

Republican lawmakers have launched their latest bid to diminish a presidentโ€™s power to protect landscapes and cultural resources. This week, Rep. Celeste Maloy, of Utah (and who happens to be Ammon Bundyโ€™s cousin), and Rep. Mark Amodei, of Nevada, introduced the Ending Presidential Overreach on Public Lands Act, which would gut the 1906 Antiquities Act and end a presidentโ€™s power to establish national monuments. I doubt this will make it very far, since national monuments and parks are pretty damned popular, and Grand Canyon, Zion, Arches, and many other national parks were first established as national monuments under the Antiquities Act.

***

On that note, the Senate held hearings on Trumpโ€™s nominee for Interior Secretary, Doug Burgum. Burgum is the former governor of North Dakota, which, by the way, is not considered a public lands state. So itโ€™s a bit bizarre that heโ€™s even being considered for this position โ€” except he is big on fossil fuels and is clearly on board with Trumpโ€™s โ€œdrill, baby, drill-energy dominanceโ€ approach. In the clips I saw, Burgum displayed a lack of knowledge on the public lands he will probably soon oversee. For example, he talked about timber harvesting on public lands, when most public-land logging occurs on U.S. Forest Service land, which is overseen by the Agriculture Department, not Interior. Then he responded to a question about the aforementioned Antiquities Act, saying: โ€œThe 1905 Antiquities Act โ€ฆ itโ€™s original intention was to protect โ€ฆ antiquities โ€ฆ areas like Indiana Jones type archaeological protections.โ€ Uhhhโ€ฆ that would be the 1906 act, buddy. And what the hell are Indiana Jones type archaeological protections? Do we really want an Interior Secretary who gleans his knowledge from the movies? Oy.

During his confirmation hearing this AM, @dougburgum.bsky.social said the Antiquities Act was meant only for "Indiana Jones-type archeological protections."Does he know his hero Teddy Roosevelt used the AA to protect 800,000 acres in and around the Grand Canyon?

Center for Western Priorities (@westernpriorities.org) 2025-01-16T19:54:10.979Z

โ›๏ธMining Monitor โ›๏ธ

Energy Fuels โ€” the owner of the White Mesa uranium mill and the Pinyon Plain mine โ€” is perhaps the most active of all the uranium companies making a lot of noise about exploration and reopening long-idled facilities. They are also the most vocal, telling reporters that current safety and environmental standards and regulations and enforcement are far better than during the Cold War era when the industry ravaged lives and the landscape.

As if to prove the point, the federal Mine Safety & Health Administration recently issued 16 citations to Energy Fuels and its contractors working on the companyโ€™s La Sal Mines Complex in southeastern Utah. Violations related to radon concentration and radon monitoring requirements, worker training, personal protection equipment use, and explosive material storage.

Sarah Fields, of Uranium Watch, says sheโ€™s โ€œnever seen this many violations of this nature at an operating uranium mine from a single inspection.โ€

One of the contractors, Three Steps Resources, is run by Kyle Kimmerle, holder of numerous mining claims throughout southern Utah and a party to Utahโ€™s lawsuit seeking to revoke Bears Ears National Monument.


1 LeFevre would become an outspoken opponent of Bill Clintonโ€™s 1996 designation of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. Interestingly, many opponents of that and the Bears Ears designation worried that they would increase industrial-scale tourism.

2 Garfield County also wants to pave a portion, at least, of the Hole-in-the-Rock road, which also crosses a section of GSENM near Escalante. Conservationists are also pushing back.

$24.97 million to support #RioGrande headwaters conservation projects: Federal funding comes in final days of Biden Administration; will support restoration efforts in #Colorado and #NewMexico — #Alamosa Citizen

Rio Grande, looking south near Cole Park. The Alamosa Riverfront Project is among several that received funding last week under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Credit: The Citizen

Click the link to read the article on the Alamosa Citizen website:

January 20, 2025

Conservationists focused on the Rio Grande Basin signal it as an initial win in a battle for federal dollars to address the impacts of drought and the need for a sustainable water supply.

Theyโ€™ve seen how the federal government has kicked into gear to address the same issues on the Colorado River Basin, and have wondered why the Rio Grande Basin largely has been ignored.

Until now. 

The U.S. Department of Interior and Bureau of Reclamation announced last week in the final days of the Biden Administration a $24.97 million award to support water conservation and habitat restoration efforts in the headwaters of the Rio Grande.

Itโ€™s a drop in the bucket compared to the billions that have been awarded to projects on the Colorado River, but itโ€™s a start.

โ€œTodayโ€™s announcement provides a critical down payment that will make the headwaters of the Rio Grande better prepared to handle the ongoing impacts of drought, while supporting state and local efforts to sustainably manage water supplies for future generations,โ€ said Alexander Funk, Director of Water Resources, Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership.

The money came through the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and was among the final announcements by the Biden Administration of funding awarded through the federal legislation. 

The significance of that is nobody in the agriculture, conservation, and water world knows if the incoming Trump Administration will carry on with the Inflation Reduction Act, or if that particular federal legislation and the $369 billion approved by Congress falls to the wayside.

โ€œWeโ€™re shocked we got anything,โ€ said Amber Pacheco of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and member of the Rio Grande Basin Roundtable. She described a rush at the end to send to the Bureau of Reclamation โ€œshovel-readyโ€ projects that could earn IRA funding.

โ€œIt was a โ€˜quick overnight, send some projects that we can fund,โ€™โ€ said Pacheco.

Rio Grande and Pecos River basins. Map credit: By Kmusser – Own work, Elevation data from SRTM, drainage basin from GTOPO [1], U.S. stream from the National Atlas [2], all other features from Vector Map., CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11218868

Out of the award comes funding for a variety of projects in the San Luis Valley as well projects for the middle Rio Grande in New Mexico. Overall, $18 million will go toward Rio Grande Basin projects in Colorado and $7 million for Rio Grande restoration efforts in New Mexico.

The San Luis Valley and Conejos Water Conservancy Districts, the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and the Rio Grande National Forest in southern Colorado are among the eight recipients selected under one cooperative agreement to receive $24.9 million for several drought resiliency activities in the Upper Rio Grande Basin, the Bureau of Reclamation said in announcing the money.

For the Valley, those projects will include the Alamosa Riverfront Restoration project; Rio Grande Reservoir Low Flow Valve; Pine River Weminuche Pass Ditch Turnback Structure; Lower Conejos River Restoration Project; Platoro Reservoir Restoration and Wildfire Risk Mitigation Project โ€“ Phase 1; Saguache Creek Multi-benefit Restoration at Upper Crossing Station; and Rio Grande Confluence Restoration Project, among others.

โ€œThis announcement shows that when Colorado and New Mexico work together, big things can help that benefit fish and wildlife, support local economies, and tackle some of the regionโ€™s most pressing water challenges,โ€ said Funk.

โ€œThe Rio Grande is the underpinning that supports the economic and ecological health of the region. This funding allows conservation partners to critically address and relieve the challenges this habitat and community have experienced from long-term drought and sustainability insecurity,โ€ said Tracy Stephens, senior specialist for riparian connectivity at The National Wildlife Federation. โ€œWe applaud the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s investment and recognition of the importance of riparian health and habitat connectivity. This funding is an important step forward in a collective effort to achieve well-connected and functional riparian corridors to protect the wellbeing of people, plants, and wildlife in the Upper Rio Grande.โ€

Screen shot from the Vimeo film, “Rio Grande Headwaters Restoration Project: Five Ditches,” https://vimeo.com/364411112

Report details the stateโ€™s โ€˜meaningfulโ€™ progress getting more water to the #GreatSaltLake — ย Kyle Dunpheyย (#Utah News Dispatch) #aridification

The shores of the Great Salt Lake near Syracuse are pictured on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)

Click the link to read the article on the Utah News-Dispatch website (Kyle Dunphey):

January 15, 2025

For the last several years, Utahโ€™s lawmakers and environmental officials have made getting water to the Great Salt Lake a priority, through policies like letting the state lease water rights from farmers, or installing new equipment to measure water flows. 

Now, a new report details the progress and impacts some of those policies are having, calling the work done so far โ€œmeaningful.โ€ 

On Tuesday, the Great Salt Lake Strike Team issued its 2025 data and insights summary, released just in time for lawmakers to review for the upcoming General Legislative Session, which starts next week.

The Great Salt Lake hit a historic low in 2022, bottoming out at 4,188.5 feet. Lawmakers and state officials prioritized the lake that following legislative session โ€” then the winters of 2023 and 2024 brought above-average snowfall, causing the lake levels to rebound slightly. On Wednesday, both the north and south arms hovered around 4,192 feet, still several feet below the โ€œecologically healthyโ€ level of 4,198 feet. 

Formed in 2023, the Great Salt Lake Strike Team is made up of researchers from the University of Utah and Utah State University, working with officials from the Utah departments of Natural Resources, Agriculture and Food, Environmental Quality and more. 

The data-heavy 28-page report released this week outlines everything from the economic benefit of the Great Salt Lake, to locations of the dust โ€œhotspotsโ€ on the dry lakebed that pose a health risk to the Wasatch Front, to models for future scenarios, and more.

The shores of the Great Salt Lake near Antelope Island are pictured on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)

The report also details some of the progress made in the last year that delivered more water to the lake. Consider this:

  • More than 288,000 acre-feet of water has been approved to flow to the lake, through users either leasing or donating their water right to the state. Thatโ€™s enough water to fill both Jordanelle and Rockport reservoirs, although the report notes thatโ€™s just whatโ€™s been approved, and doesnโ€™t represent the actual amount of water thatโ€™s been delivered.ย 
  • The Legislature is spending $1 million in one-time funds and $1 million in annual funds to install measurement infrastructure so the Utah Division of Water Rights can see exactlyย how much water is flowing to the lake. An additional $3 million from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Geological Survey is also going toward measurement equipment.ย 
  • In addition to funding for water monitoring, state and federal governments have thrown nearly $100 million at the lake for various projects, includingย $50 millionย from the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for conservation; $5.4 million from the state for wetland conservation; $22 million from the state for Great Salt Lake water infrastructure projects; $15 million from the state to the Great Salt Lake Commissionerโ€™s Office to help lease water; and $1.5 million to start a state-funded study exploring ways to deliver more water from Utah Lake to the Great Salt Lake.
  • Compass Minerals and Morton Salt, which both operate on the lake, donated a total of 255,298 acre-feet of water to the state.ย Compass Mineralsย is also relinquishing about 65,000 acres of leased land to the state for conservation purposes.ย 
  • Lawmakers in 2024 passed a number of bills to help the lake, including tightened regulations and taxes on mineral extraction, allowing agricultural water users to sell leased water and restricting the use of overhead sprinklers for new government construction in the Great Salt Lake Basin.ย 
  • There have also been some environmental wins. Brine shrimp populations are rebounding, with a 50% increase in egg numbers compared to last year. American white pelicans returned to their nesting sites on the lake. And the state removed 15,600 acres of phragmites, an invasive plant.

The report notes that the state has made โ€œmeaningful progress.โ€ And while it clarifies that the report is purely data-focused and doesnโ€™t make policy recommendations, it does lay out โ€œpotential policy levers.โ€ 

An American avocet is pictured at the Great Salt Lake near Antelope Island on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. (Photo by Spenser Heaps for Utah News Dispatch)

That includes greater incentives for water leasing. The state made several new options available for water right holders, including letting farmers lease water for a portion of the year, water banking (which gives water users more flexibility over leasing agreements) and applications allowing users to quantify water saved through optimization projects. 

But according to the report, the state hasnโ€™t yet received any applications for these three programs. 

The Utah Legislature also recently subsidized the installation of secondary water meters, so water districts know how much theyโ€™re using โ€” those meters are often associated with water savings. The report recommends water districts in the Great Salt Lake Basin donate or lease that saved water for the lake. 

โ€œAll indications demonstrate that delivering more water to the lake is a far more cost-effective solution than managing the impacts of a lake at a perpetually low level,โ€ said Brian Steed, the co-chair of the strike team and Great Salt Lake Commissioner. โ€œWe can invest time and financial resources now or pay much later. Fortunately, we have great data and a balanced and workable plan to succeed.โ€

Sunset from the western shore of Antelope Island State Park, Great Salt Lake, Utah, United States.. Sunset viewed from White Rock Bay, on the western shore of Antelope Island. Carrington Island is visible in the distance. By Ccmdav – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2032320

Water-short #RepublicanRiver Basin hits farm dry-up milestone, as #Kansas looks on — Jerd Smith (Fresh Water News)

Republican River in Colorado January 2023 near the Nebraska border. Photo credit: Allen Best/Big Pivots

Click the link to read the article on the Water Education Colorado website (Jerd Smith):

January 16, 2025

Farm communities on the Eastern Plains, under the gun to deliver water to Kansas and Nebraska, are poised to permanently retire 17,000 acres of land, with the help of $30 million in state and federal funding.

Creating a balance of water that’s taken from aquifers and water that replenishes aquifers is an important aspect of making sure water will be available when itโ€™s needed. Image from โ€œGetting down to facts: A Visual Guide to Water in the Pinal Active Management Area,โ€ courtesy of Ashley Hullinger and the University of Arizona Water Resources Research Center

From Wray, to Yuma to Burlington, growers are being paid to permanently shut off irrigation wells linked to the Republican River to ensure the vital waterway can deliver enough water to neighbors to the east, as required under the Republican River Compact of 1943.

As of this month, ranchers had already retired 10,000 acres under the program, and the rest will be set aside in coming months.

By 2029, the region must retire an additional 8,000 acres, as required under a compact resolution signed in 2016, for a total of 25,000 acres, according to Deb Daniel, general manager of the Republican River Water Conservation District, which is overseeing the initiative.  This is occurring in an area on the south fork of the river.

According to Colorado State University it is one of the largest dry-ups of irrigated agricultural lands in the West.

The dry-up has allowed Colorado to meet a critical deadline with Kansas, demonstrating that it was making progress on the goal.

Coloradoโ€™s Republican River Basin. Credit: State of Colorado.

โ€œWe did it,โ€ said Daniel. But more work remains. 

The 2022 funding came under the American Rescue Plan Act, the COVID-relief program that Congress approved giving states hundreds of millions of dollars to buffer the effects of the pandemic.

Through that program, Colorado lawmakers approved $30 million to the Republican and $30 million to the Rio Grande Basin as well for a similar program.

This year, the Republican Basin will receive another $6 million in state funding to continue paying farmers to permanently shut off wells.

โ€œAgriculture is the economic driver for the northeastern counties of Colorado. This is a difficult situation for the producers,โ€ said Jason Ullmann, state engineer with the Colorado Division of Water Resources. โ€œI know this work hasnโ€™t been easy, and more must be done. I applaud the Republican River Water Conservation District for their major efforts to reach this deadline,โ€ he said in a statement.

A new analysis shows a nearly 30% decline in Coloradoโ€™s irrigated lands in the last 25 years, driven in part by the stateโ€™s legal obligations to deliver water across state boundaries, as in the Republican Basin. Other factors include declining river flows due to climate change and drought, and the dry-up of farmlands by fast-growing cities.

Daniel said water officials hope they can continue to pay farmers to permanently retire land and to do so in a way that doesnโ€™t cripple the regional economy.

โ€œWe need time to let these communities adjust, to adapt to having less irrigated agriculture. As these wells go down, our communities are adjusting, but most of the time, unless they have other industries, the communities just go away,โ€ Daniel said.

More by Jerd Smith

More than 9,000 Landsat images provide vegetation health metrics for the Republican River Basin. Credit: David Hyndman

Forest Service presents results of beaver inventory — Heather Sackett (AspenJournalism.org) #FryingpanRiver #RoaringForkRiver #ColoradoRiver

Beavers have constructed a network of dams and lodges on this Woody Creek property. Pitkin County funded a two-year beaver inventory in the headwaters of the Roaring Fork and its tributaries. Credit: HEATHER SACKETT/Aspen Journalism

Click the link to read the article on the Aspen Journalism website (Heather Sackett):

January 17, 2025

Thanks to Pitkin County, local land managers now have more information about beavers and their habitat, which could eventually lead to projects aimed at improving stream conditions.

Over the summers of 2023 and 2024, technicians with the U.S. Forest Service covered roughly 353,000 acres of land throughout the headwaters of the Roaring Fork River and its tributaries, surveying 296 randomly chosen sites on 66 streams for beavers, their dams and lodges or other signs they had once been there like chewed sticks. The surveys, which were funded with $100,000 from Pitkin County Healthy Rivers, found that 17% of the sites were currently occupied by beaver, 34% of the sites had some signs of beaver and 37% of sites had evidence of past beaver occupation. 

Clay Ramey, a fisheries biologist with the White River National Forest, presented the findings of the two-year inventory to the Healthy Rivers board at its regular meeting Thursday evening. 

โ€œIt would seem that while beaver were once common there, the vegetation has shifted from aspen to conifer and therefore that area doesnโ€™t appear to have a lot of potential for beaver in its current state,โ€ the inventory report reads.

Another interesting finding from the inventory is that there is less willow found in areas where cattle graze. But what that means for beavers is unclear. 

โ€œThe beavers are occupying grazed areas and ungrazed areas basically to the same extent,โ€ Ramey said. โ€œSo there was nothing to suggest that beavers are avoiding or being excluded from grazed areas.โ€

Samantha Alford, right, and Stephanie Lewis, technicians with the U.S. Forest Service, measure the slope and width of Conundrum Creek in summer 2023. A two-year inventory of beavers in the headwaters of the Roaring Fork watershed recorded where beavers currently live and where they lived in the past. Credit: HEATHER SACKETT/Aspen Journalism

The information gleaned from the inventory will now help the Forest Service decide where to do prescribed burns and stream restoration projects in an effort to create more and better beaver habitat. Ramey said the Forest Service is undergoing a National Environmental Protection Act process for projects on Fourmile Creek and Middle Thompson Creek. Both creeks had evidence of extensive use by beavers in the past, but Fourmile in particular is currently under-utilized by the animals, with only 3% of sites currently occupied by beavers. Growing more willows may entice beavers back.

Pitkin County Healthy Rivers, whose mission includes improving water quality and quantity, has been working over the past few years to educate the public about the benefits to the ecosystem of having North Americaโ€™s largest rodent on the landscape. Funding the Forest Service beaver inventory is part of the organizationโ€™s โ€œBring Back Beaversโ€ campaign. 

Prized for their pelts by early trappers and later seen as a nuisance to farmers and ranchers, beavers were killed in large numbers and their populations have still not fully recovered. But there has been a growing recognition in recent years that beavers play a crucial role in the health of ecosystems. By building dams that pool water, the engineers of the forest can transform channelized streams into sprawling, soggy floodplains that recharge groundwater, create habitat for other species, improve water quality, and create areas resistant to wildfires and climate change. 

Healthy Rivers Board Chair Kirstin Neff said the ultimate driver of the organizationโ€™s commitment to bringing back beavers is an interest in the health of the Roaring Fork watershed. 

โ€œOur goal is to get good habitat work done on the ground,โ€ Neff said. โ€œThe things weโ€™re concerned about are water availability for wildlife and downstream users and things like wildfire risk.โ€ 

Aspen Journalism, which is solely responsible for its editorial content, is supported by a grant from the Pitkin County Healthy Community Fund.

This story is provided by Aspen Journalism, a nonprofit, investigative news organization covering water, environment, social justice and more. Visit aspenjournalism.org.

Map of the Roaring Fork River drainage basin in western Colorado, USA. Made using USGS data. By Shannon1 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=69290878

Lousy #RioGrande #snowpack, but the runoff forecast is not as bad as I thought! — John Fleck (InkStain.net)

Click the link to read the article on the InkStain.net website (John Fleck):

January 9, 2025

The January NRCS Rio Grande runoff forecast is lousy: a mid-point forecast of 65 percent of average at Otowi (upstream of Albuquerque) and 37 percent of average at San Marcial (downstream of Albuquerque). Based on the current snowpack, I expected worse. Forecaster Karl Wetlaufer, in the email distributing the numbers, explains:

Wetlaufer also reminds us that thereโ€™s a lot of snowpack season ahead of us. The numbers above are the median forecast. The one-in-ten wettest side (10 percent exceedence) is ~115% of average at Otowi, and the one-in-ten dry (90 percent exceedence) is less than 20% of average.

EPA takes unprecedented step to remove uranium waste from the Navajo Nation: The decision opens the door for new ways to manage uranium pollution on tribal land — Natalia Mesa (High Country News)

Red Water Pond Road Community leader, Larry King, addresses plans to relocate the Quivera Mine Waste Pile that is located about 1,000 feet from the closest residence. Shayla Blatchford

Click the link to read the article on the High Country News website (Natalia Mesa):

January 17, 2025

As a child, herding her grandmotherโ€™s sheep, Teracita Keyanna unknowingly wandered onto land contaminated with radioactive waste from three abandoned uranium mine and mill waste sites located near her home on the Navajo Nation. 

Keyanna and other Dinรฉ citizens have been living with the consequences of uranium mining near the Red Water Pond Road community since the 1960s. But now, uranium waste rock that has sat for decades at a Superfund site will finally be moved to a landfill off tribal land.

โ€œThis is a seismic shift in policy for Indigenous communities,โ€ said Eric Jantz, an attorney for the New Mexico Environmental Law Center. 

On Jan. 5, in a first-of-its-kind move, the Environmental Protection Agency signed an action memo to transport 1 million cubic yards of low-grade radioactive waste from the Quivira Mining Co. Church Rock Mine to a disposal site at the Red Rock Regional Landfill. The Northwest New Mexico Regional Solid Waste Authority owns and operates the landfill, which is located about 6 miles east of Thoreau, New Mexico. 

โ€œI feel like our community has finally had a win,โ€ Keyanna said. She is a member of the Red Water Pond Road Community Association, a grassroots organization made up of Dinรฉ families that have been advocating for the waste removal for almost two decades. โ€œItโ€™ll help the community heal.โ€

Companies extracted an estimated 30 million tons of uranium ore on or near the Navajo Nation from 1944 to 1986, largely to fuel the federal governmentโ€™s enormous nuclear arsenal. When the mines were abandoned in the 1980s, the toxic waste remained. Today, there are hundreds of abandoned mines in plain sight on the Navajo Nation, contaminating the water, air and soil. Altogether, there are an estimated 15,000 uranium mines across the West โ€” 1,200 of them on the Navajo Nation alone โ€” with the majority located in the Four Corners region. 

The impact of all this mining on Dinรฉ communities has been devastating. A 2008 study found uranium contamination in 29 water sources across the Navajo Nation, while other studies show that people living near waste sites face a high risk of kidney failure and various cancers. 

At Quivira, the cleanup is set to begin in early 2025 and will continue for six to eight years, according to an EPA news release. The permitting process, which will provide opportunity for public comment, will be overseen by the New Mexico authority that manages the proposed waste site and is responsible for its long-term safety monitoring.  

Mine Waste Area with Limited Vegetation. Photo credit: EPA

The EPA had considered multiple options for waste remediation. But for years, Red Water Pond Road advocates and other local organizations continually pushed it to simply remove the waste, a course of action that the EPA has never taken before, even though the Navajo Nation has repeatedly called for the federal government to move all uranium waste from Dinรฉ tribal land. 

Throughout the Navajo Nation, said Jantz, โ€œprior to this decision, EPAโ€™s primary choice in terms of remediation of mine was to bury the piles under some dirt and plant some grass seeds on top, called cap in place.โ€ But studies have shown that this approach is not effective at containing radioactive waste in the long term, he said. 

The agency took a similar approach when addressing the other uranium waste in the Church Rock area. In 2013, the EPA and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which oversees uranium mine-waste cleanup, dumped 1 million cubic yards of waste from the Northeast Church Rock Mine โ€” a different waste site, roughly 3 miles from the Quivira Mine โ€” on top of existing tailings located half a mile from the Red Water Pond Road communities. 

But the EPA plans to handle the Quivira Mineโ€™s waste differently, placing it in geoengineered disposal cells with a groundwater leak protection system after it is moved off-site, an approach that Jantz called โ€œstate-of-the-art.โ€

The Quivira Mine cleanup is part of the 2014 Tronox settlement, which provided $5.15 billion to clean up contaminated sites across the United States. The settlement allocated $1 billion of those funds to clean up 50 uranium mines across the Navajo Nation. 

There is a lot more to be done, said Susan Gordon, coordinator for the Multicultural Alliance for a Safe Environment, a grassroots organization led by uranium-impacted communities. Hundreds of abandoned mines pepper the Navajo Nation, and the EPA has not formulated a broader plan to clean up the majority of them. Funding is also an issue, she added. 

What the EPAโ€™s decision means for the future of uranium mine waste remediation is unclear. Under other circumstances, Jantz said that the decision would signal a sea change for the EPAโ€™s policy of removing waste from the Navajo Nation. But the incoming Trump administration has not indicated its policy on hazardous waste disposal.

As Jantz put it, โ€œAll bets are off.โ€

Graphic credit: Environmental Protection Agency

How America courted increasingly destructive wildfires โˆ’ and what that means for protecting homesย today — The Conversation #ActOnClimate

The Palisades Fire spreads near homes amid a powerful windstorm on Jan. 7, 2025. Mario Tama/Getty Images

Justin Angle, University of Montana

The fires burning in the Los Angeles area are a powerful example of why humans have learned to fear wildfire. Fires can level entire neighborhoods in an instant. They can destroy communities, torch pristine forests and choke even faraway cities with toxic smoke.

Over a century of fire suppression efforts have conditioned Americans to expect wildland firefighters to snuff out fires quickly, even as people build homes deeper into landscapes that regularly burn. But as the LA fires show, and as journalist Nick Mott and I explored in our book โ€œThis Is Wildfire: How to Protect Your Home, Yourself, and Your Community in the Age of Heatโ€ and 2021 podcast โ€œFireline,โ€ this expectation and our societyโ€™s relationship with wildfire need to change.

Over time, extensive fire suppression, home construction in high fire-risk areas and climate change have set the stage for the increasingly destructive wildfires we see today.

The legacy of fire suppression

The way the U.S. deals with wildfires today dates back to around 1910, when the Great Burn torched about 3 million acres across Washington, Idaho, Montana and British Columbia. After watching the fireโ€™s swift and unstoppable spread, the fledgling U.S. Forest Service developed a military-style apparatus built to eradicate wildfire.

The U.S. got really good at putting out fires. So good that citizens grew to accept fire suppression as something the government simply does.

A black and white photo shows a man standing on a mountaintop rock looking through binoculars, with mountains in the background. Another sits on the rock beside him.
A ranger and forest guard on fire patrol duty near Thompson Falls, Mont., in 1909. Forest Service photo by W.J. Lubken

Today, state, federal and private firefighters deploy across the country when fires break out, along with tankers, bulldozers, helicopters and planes. The Forest Service touts a record of snuffing out 98% of wildfires before they burn 100 acres (40 hectares).

One consequence in a place like Los Angeles is that when a wildfire enters an urban environment, the public expects it to be put out before it causes much damage. But the nationโ€™s wildland firefighting systems arenโ€™t designed for that.

Wildland firefighting tactics, such as digging lines to stop a fire from spreading and steering fires toward natural fuel breaks, donโ€™t work in dense neighborhoods like Pacific Palisades. Aerial water and retardant drops canโ€™t happen when high winds make it unsafe to fly. At the same time, the regionโ€™s municipal firefighting forces and water systems werenโ€™t designed for this sort of fire โ€“ a conflagration engulfing entire neighborhoods quickly overwhelms the system.

Long ago, Southern Californiaโ€™s scrub-forest ecosystems would periodically burn, limiting fuel for future fires. But aggressive fire suppression and inattention to urban overgrowth have left excessive, easy-to-ignite vegetation in many areas. Itโ€™s unclear, however, whether prescribed burning could have prevented this catastrophe.

This is primarily a people problem. People have built more homes and cities in fire-prone areas and done so with little regard for wildfire resilience. And the greenhouse gases released by decades of burning fossil fuels to run power plants, industries and vehicles have caused global temperatures to rise, compounding the threat.

An illustration of the wildland urban interface, showing homes in the mountain foothills next to a city in a valley.
The wildland-urban interface starts on the edges of cities where homes are built closer to forests and grasslands. Courtesy of Jessy Stevenson

Climate change and wildfires

The relationship between climate and wildfire is fairly simple: Higher temperatures lead to more fire. Higher temperatures increase moisture evaporation, drying out plants and soil and making them more likely to burn. When hot, dry winds are blowing, a spark in an already dry area can quickly blow up into dangerous wildfire.

Given the rise in global temperatures that the world has already experienced, much of the western U.S. is actually in a fire deficit because of the practice of suppressing most fires. That means that, based on historical data, we should expect far more fire than weโ€™re actually seeing.

Fortunately, there are things everyone can do to break this cycle.

What fire managers can do

First, everyone can accept that firefighters canโ€™t and shouldnโ€™t put out every low-risk wildfire.

Remote fires that pose little threat to communities and property can breathe life into ecosystems. Frequent, natural fires can also help avoid catastrophic fires that occur when too much underbrush has built up for fuel. And they create fuel breaks on the landscape that could halt the advance of future flames.

A firefighter walks beside a line of low-level flames in a forest. The tree canopies aren't burning, only the ground-level vegetation is.
Controlled burns are used to clear out undergrowth that can fuel catastrophic blazes under dry, windy conditions. U.S. Forest Service

Fire managers have advanced mapping technology that can help them decide when and where forests can burn safely. Thoughtful prescribed burning โ€“ meaning low-intensity fires intentionally set by professionals โ€“ can offer many of the same benefits as the flames that historically burned in forests and grasslands.

The Forest Service is aiming to ramp up its prescribed burning on more acres in more areas across the country. However, the agency struggles to train adequate staff and pay for the projects, and environmental reviews sometimes cause yearslong delays. Other groups offer beacons of hope. Indigenous groups across the country, for example, are returning fire to the landscape.

Adapting homes to fire risk

More than one-third of U.S. homes are in whatโ€™s known as the wildland-urban interface โ€“ the zone where houses and other structures intermingle with flammable vegetation. This zone now includes many urban areas where wildfire risk was not considered when their cities were developed.

The biggest risk to homes comes from burning embers blowing on the wind and landing in weak spots that can set a house ablaze. Those embers can ride high winds for multiple miles to nestle in dry leaves or pine needles clogging a gutter, a wood-shingle roof, or shrubs, trees and other flammable vegetation close to a structure.

An illustration of a house with trees certain distances and advice on how to keep the home safe from fires.
Owning a home in the wildland-urban interface means paying attention to fire risks. Risks are highlighted on the left and solutions on the right. Courtesy of Jessy Stevenson

Some of these vulnerabilities are easy to fix. Cleaning a homeโ€™s gutters or trimming back too-close vegetation requires little effort and tools already around the house.

Grant programs exist to help harden homes against wildfire. But enormous investment is needed to get the work done at the scale the fire risk requires. For example, nearly 1 million U.S. homes in wildfire-prone areas have highly combustible wooden roofs. Retrofitting those roofs will cost an estimated US$6 billion, but that investment could save lives and property and reduce wildfire management costs in the future.

Homeowners can look to resources such as Firewise USA to learn about the โ€œhome ignition zone.โ€ It describes the types of vegetation and other flammable objects that become high risks at different distances from a structure and steps to make properties more fire resilient. https://www.youtube.com/embed/M9sel3wcBLg?wmode=transparent&start=0 The fire chief for Spokane, Wash., explains ways to protect your property from wildfires.

For example, homes should not have flammable plants, firewood, dried leaves or needles, or anything burnable, on or under decks and porches within 5 feet (1.5 meters) of the house. Between 5 and 30 feet (9 meters), grasses should be mowed short, and the tree canopy should be at least 10 feet (3 meters) from the structure.

The key takeaway is that homeowners must begin to view their homes as potential fuel for a wildfire.

Rebuilding right

A possible outcome of Californiaโ€™s devastating fires is that states and communities could enact forward-looking wildfire resilience policies. These can include developing zoning rules and regulations that require developers to build with fire-resistant materials and designs. Or they might prohibit building in areas where the risk is too high.

Californiaโ€™s move to fast-track reconstruction, if it isnโ€™t planned with wildfire safety requirements, will just set up the state for more fire disasters. The International Wildland-Urban Interface Code, which provides guidance for safeguarding homes and communities from wildfire, has been adopted in jurisdictions in at least 24 states. California is not one of them.

A man carries a chain saw through an overgrown area with trees behind him.
Protecting homes from wildfires includes maintaining a safe perimeter clear of potential fuel for a fire. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Living in a world with wildfire

Prevention and suppression will always be critical pieces of wildfire strategy. Though promising new firefighting technologies are being developed, adapting to a fiery future means everyone has a role.

Educate yourself on how wildfire is managed in your area. Understand and address risks to your home and community. Help your neighbors. Advocate for better wildfire planning, policy and resources.

Living in a world where more wildfire is inevitable requires that everyone see themselves as part of solving the problem. It means we must accept that some fire is natural and essential and that some places we love might be too dangerous to protect.

This is an updated version of an article originally published Aug. 22, 2023.

Justin Angle, Professor of Marketing, University of Montana

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Why the West needs prairie dogs: Theyโ€™re among the regionโ€™s most despised species, but some tribes, researchers and landowners are racing to save them. — Christine Peterson (High Country News), Photography — Louise Johns

Prairie dogs emerge from their burrow in a colony on American Prairie in Montana. Prairie dogs, once one of the most abundant animals on the prairie, now occupy 2% of their historic range.Louise Johns/High Country News

Click the link to read the article on the High Country News website (Christine Peterson, Photography — Louise Johns:

The prairie dog caught in Trap 69 was angry. And who could blame her? After waking up in her burrow on a mid-September morning, sheโ€™d waddled innocently outside for a breakfast of mini marshmallows and carrots, only to find herself stuck in a wire cage and carried across the prairie. Then a pair of human hands had gripped her like a burrito while two more hands put a black rubber tracking collar around her neck.ย 

The situation was worse than she realized: Prairie dogs are among the most maligned and persecuted animal species in the Western U.S. So maligned, in fact, that a 2020 survey in northern Montana found that well over half the areaโ€™s landowners believed prairie dogs should not live on public land. 

To make matters even grimmer, this particular prairie dog had fleas. And those fleas could have been carrying the bacteria that causes plague โ€” the Black Death. โ€œItโ€™s not great,โ€ commented researcher Jesse Boulerice as he adjusted his gentle grip around her midsection.

The rodent responded by biting into Boulericeโ€™s leather glove, hanging on with her two front teeth while researchers swiped a black streak of Clairolโ€™s Niceโ€™n Easy hair dye down her back. 

Though black-tailed prairie dogs have a long-standing reputation as pests, their ingenious tunnel systems and industrious prairie pruning make them one of the Westโ€™s primary ecosystem engineers. Some researchers call them the โ€œchicken nuggets of the prairieโ€; if a prairie species eats meat, it almost certainly eats prairie dogs. Without prairie dogs, black-footed ferrets would never survive outside zoos and breeding facilities, and we would have far fewer mountain ploversburrowing owls, swift foxes, and ferruginous hawks

Before 1800, an estimated 5 billion prairie dogs lived from Canada to Mexico, covering the West with underground apartment complexes that shifted over the centuries like sand dunes. The Lakota, Dakota and other Indigenous peoples of the prairie shaped and depended on the ecosystems prairie dogs created. Some relied on prairie dogs for nourishment during thin times, or used them as a ceremonial food. 

But European settlers were remarkably effective at shooting and poisoning prairie dogs and plowing up their burrows. Today, the five prairie dog species occupy just 2% of their historic range, and some occupy even less. 

Prairie dogs still survive in many of their historic territories: Black-tailed prairie dogs, known for their especially large, dense colonies, persist in isolated pockets of the prairie east of the Rocky Mountains from Canada to Mexico. White-tailed prairie dogs live in parts of Montana, Wyoming, Utah and Colorado. Gunnisonโ€™s prairie dogs eke out an existence in southern Colorado, and Utah prairie dogs live in, well, Utah. Mexican prairie dogs still hang on in small slices of northern Mexico. But many of these populations are too small to serve their ecosystems as they once did.

Within this familiar story of colonization and species decline, however, are more hopeful stories of creativity and adaptation: Researchers are using pedometer-like devices to map prairie dogsโ€™ underground tunnels, remote-controlled badgers to understand prairie dog alarm calls and Kitchen-Aid mixers to craft solutions to deadly disease. After decades of restoration work by tribal wildlife managers, prairie dogs, black-footed ferrets, swift foxes and bison are once again roaming the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation in north-central Montana, one of the few places in the world where all four species coexist. Some private landowners, meanwhile, are finding ways to tolerate the rodents. Together, these researchers, managers and landowners are striving to conserve the Westโ€™s remaining prairie dogs and the prairie that depends on them. 

Jesse Boulerice, research ecologist with the Smithsonianโ€™s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, inspects a prairie dog his team trapped at American Prairie in Montana. The researchers aim to better understand prairie dog movements. Louise Johns/High Country News

ONCE THE COLLARED prairie dog was returned to her Tru Catch wire cage to await release, Boulerice reached into the next trap in line. 

Boulerice is part of a team from the Smithsonianโ€™s National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute that is collaring and tracking prairie dogs at American Prairie โ€” formerly the American Prairie Reserve โ€” in central Montana. Each collar measures the animalโ€™s acceleration and angle; by triangulating with locations picked up by sensors posted on poles throughout the colony, researchers can determine where and how far the prairie dogs travel both above and below ground. The Clairol dye patterns provide one more way to tell whoโ€™s who in a colony of look-alikes. 

Though other researchers have studied prairie dogsโ€™ aboveground lives, no one really knows what they do underground. Satellite imagery can be used to track Arctic terns over Alaska or grizzly bears deep in the wilderness, but it canโ€™t penetrate the Earth. Decades ago, researchers laboriously excavated a white-tailed prairie dog burrow in southern Montana, revealing features like โ€œsleeping quarters,โ€ hibernacula, and a โ€œmaternity areaโ€ โ€” but such work is invasive and yields little data on the animalsโ€™ movements. 

At American Prairie in September, the Smithsonian team was joined by researchers from Swansea University in Wales who had developed the tracking collars Boulerice used. The collars were originally designed to study penguins underwater, an environment similarly resistant to conventional satellite tracking.  

Prairie dogs arenโ€™t the only occupants of prairie dog burrows. The mazes of tunnels and rooms also provide shelter for black-footed ferrets, swift foxes and untold numbers of insects. Burrowing owls shimmy their puffball bodies into the tunnels, where they raise their chicks on the plentiful bugs. Prairie rattlesnakes, tiger salamanders, horned lizards and badgers use them, too. 

And as climate extremes become more common aboveground, these burrows may become even more important. 

โ€œBy creating tunnels, theyโ€™re also creating a thermal refuge,โ€ said Hila Shamon, the director of the Smithsonianโ€™s Great Plains Science Program and principal investigator of the colony-mapping project. โ€œThe prairie can be so hot in the summer or brutally, brutally cold in the winter. You donโ€™t have any shade or place to hide from the cold โ€ฆ and conditions in the tunnel systems are consistent.โ€

Prairie dogs spend much of the day and all night in their burrows, living in family coteries composed of one male, three or four females and the yearโ€™s young. Their tunnel systems, which can extend across an area larger than  a football field, are like bustling apartment complexes where every family has its separate unit. Residents periodically pop out of doors to grab food, gossip about the neighbors and scan for danger. 

โ€œIn the prairie,โ€ Shamon said, โ€œthereโ€™s a whole world thatโ€™s happening beneath the ground that we canโ€™t see. But it exists, and itโ€™s very deep, and itโ€™s important.โ€

Aboveground, the effect of prairie dogs on the landscape is more obvious. โ€œPrairie dogs create an entirely novel habitat type,โ€ said Andy Boyce, a Smithsonian research ecologist. โ€œThey graze intensely. They increase the forbs and flowering plants, and they clip woody vegetation. They will eat and nibble on a new woody plant until it tips over and dies.โ€

The landscape created by prairie dogs may look barren, but the reality is more nuanced. A healthy prairie isnโ€™t an uninterrupted sea of grass; itโ€™s  made up of grass and shrubs, wetlands and wildflowers and even large patches of bare dirt that allow prairie dogs โ€” and other species โ€” to spot approaching predators. 

Bison like to wallow in the dirt exposed by prairie dogs, and graze on the nutritious grass and plants that resprout after a prairie dog pruning. Mountain plovers and thick-billed longspurs frequently nest on the grazed surface of prairie dog towns. (Both birds have declined along with prairie dogs; the mountain plover has been proposed for protection under the Endangered Species Act.) 

Prairie dog colonies may also provide other species with a home-alarm system. โ€œYou have 1,000 little pairs of eyeballs constantly searching for predators all around you and then vocalizing loudly when they see them,โ€ Boyce said. To test this hypothesis, Boyceโ€™s Ph.D. student Andrew Dreelin attached a taxidermied badger to a remote-controlled car and drove it near long-billed curlew nests in Montana prairie dog colonies. He then measured how nesting curlews responded to the badger with and without a warning from the prairie dogs. 

Results are pending, said Dreelin, but heโ€™s certain that โ€œweโ€™ve only just started to scratch the surface on the multifaceted ways that prairie dogs could shape the lives of birds on the prairie.โ€ 

A prairie dog is collared by Smithsonian scientists at American Prairie. Louise Johns/High Country News

IN EARLY OCTOBER, about 500 miles south of American Prairie, Colten Salyer also donned thick leather gloves to protect himself from an angry mammalโ€™s teeth. Then he opened a cat carrier filled with paper shavings and a member of a species once considered extinct. 

The young black-footed ferret inside bared its long white canines. Bred at the National Black-Footed Ferret Conservation Center in northern Colorado, she was one of 20 about to be reintroduced to southcentral Wyomingโ€™s Shirley Basin.

The black-footed ferret is North Americaโ€™s only native ferret and one of only three ferret species in the world. And if thereโ€™s one thing black-footed ferrets need, itโ€™s prairie dogs. They eat them almost exclusively, and they use their tunnels to live, hunt and reproduce, slipping in and out of burrows as they move like water across the landscape. 

In 1980, black-footed ferrets were declared extinct, most likely extinguished by disease, development and endless prairie dog poisoning campaigns. But in 1981, a northern Wyoming ranch dog proudly presented his owners with his most recent treasure: a dead ferret. A local taxidermist confirmed that it was, in fact, a black-footed ferret, a member of a tiny remnant population. 

The newly discovered ferrets lived in the wild until 1985, when biologists discovered that disease had killed all but 18. At that point, they scooped up the remaining ferrets and took them to captive breeding facilities. Only seven successfully reproduced, but those seven now have more than 11,000 descendants. In 2020, researchers used DNA from a wild-caught ferret with no surviving offspring to produce the first cloned ferret. Since then, they have created two more cloned individuals, and this past November, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service announced that one had given birth to healthy kits.

Captive-bred ferrets have now been released across the West. But to survive long-term, they need prairie dog colonies. And prairie dogs arenโ€™t popular with their human neighbors. 

Because they eat the same grass cows do. And they make holes. 

โ€œI was running to rope a yearling once, and I stood up in the saddle and was about to open my hand โ€” and all of a sudden the horseโ€™s front end disappeared,โ€ said Salyer, a ranch manager in Shirley Basin who volunteered to help with the releases. His horse had sunk a hoof into a prairie dog hole, a misstep that sent Salyer tumbling to the ground.  

Both Salyer and his horse were fine, and he shrugged after telling the story.But most ranchers have, or have heard, similar stories, many of which end with a valued horse breaking a leg. Thereโ€™s no way to know how frequently horses injure themselves in burrows, but the stories spread as fast as a prairie fire. 

Whatโ€™s certain is that prairie dogs eat grass. Quite a bit of grass: A single prairie dog can devour up to 2 pounds of green grass and non-woody plants every week, according to Montana State University. For ranchers who use that vegetation to feed their cows, prairie dogs look like competition. Researchers, however, say the effects of prairie dogs on livestock forage are mixed. Black-tailed prairie dogsโ€™ propensity to clip and mow, for instance, results in plants with higher fat and protein and lower fiber. โ€œAcross years, enhanced forage quality may help to offset reductions in forage quantity for agricultural producers,โ€ a study published in 2019 by Rangeland Ecology and Management reported.

This uncertainty has led to some bureaucratic contradictions. The Wyoming Department of Agriculture labels prairie dogs as pest species and offers training in properly using pesticides to kill them; at the same time, the Wyoming Game and Fish Department lists the black-tailed prairie dog as a species of greatest conservation need

Smithsonian ecologist Jesse Boulerice holds one of the tracking collars used to study prairie dogs at American Prairie. Louise Johns/High Country News
A collared prairie dog waits to be released. Louise Johns/High Country News
A collared prairie dog is released through a tube that researchers use to check that the sensors on the collars are working properly. Louise Johns/High Country News

Until the 1990s, said Randy Matchett, a Fish and Wildlife Service biologist in central Montana, prairie dogs were so despised in places like Phillips County, Montana, that the Bureau of Land Management produced maps of their colonies designed for sport shooters. Attitudes havenโ€™t changed much: In 2020, 27 years after an initial survey of attitudes toward black-tailed prairie dogs and black-footed ferrets in Montana, researchers found that feelings about them had barely budged

Matchett said that when he tells his Montana neighbors that only 2% of prairie dogs remain, a common attitude is: โ€œWhat the hellโ€™s the holdup getting rid of that last 2%?โ€

Chamois Andersen, a Defenders of Wildlife senior field representative, has spent decades working with landowners in prairie dog-rich places, and sheโ€™s persuaded some to allow researchers to survey their land for black-footed ferrets in exchange for funds for noxious weed removal. She speculates that younger generations of ranchers are more open to prairie dog conservation and to partnerships with public agencies and wildlife groups.

Matchett is less optimistic. Even the U.S. Forest Service and National Park Service, which together manage one of the largest black-footed ferret colonies in the world in South Dakotaโ€™s Conata Basin, poison some prairie dogs on federal land to prevent the population from moving onto private property.

Not all prairie dogs are equally reviled. White-tailed prairie dogs like those in Shirley Basin live at lower densities and tend to clip plants farther up the stems, making them less obvious to the casual observer. Landowners, as a result, are often more tolerant of them than their black-tailed cousins, said Andrew Gygli, a small-carnivore biologist for Wyoming Game and Fish. 

Bob Heward, whose family started ranching in Shirley Basin more than a century ago, understands that a disliked species can also be useful. 

He invites recreational shooters to target prairie dogs on his land, but he wonโ€™t use poison to kill the rodents because he knows they provide food for other species. Prairie dogs are a โ€œnuisance,โ€ he said, but theyโ€™re also as inevitable as the wind: โ€œWeโ€™ve learned to live with them. Theyโ€™ve been here longer than I have.โ€

THE MALE SWIFT FOX at the end of the trap line was chunky, at least by swift fox standards: Though he weighed only about 5 pounds, his belly was round beneath his fluffy fur. His black eyes carefully followed Smithsonian researcher Hila Shamon as she loaded him into the backseat of her four-door pickup, covering the trap with a blanket as she prepared to transport him from this ranch north of Laramie, Wyoming, to a new home on the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation in Montana. 

Unlike black-footed ferrets, swift foxes can survive without prairie dogs, but when prairie dogs are scarce they suffer from the loss of food, Shamon said, and are deprived of the shelter they find in prairie dog burrows. So they, too, declined as prairie dogs were exterminated and prairie habitat was converted into cropland. By the early 1900s, they had disappeared from Canada, Montana, North Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma. 

But swift foxes still live in parts of the West โ€” and in some places, their populations are being restored. For the last five years, Shamon and her team have trapped swift foxes in Wyoming and Colorado and trucked them to Fort Belknap. This rectangle of grassland, buttes and prairie breaks near the Canadian border is home to the Nakoda (Assiniboine) and Aโ€™aninin (Gros Ventre), both Great Plains peoples. Today, it is one of the only places in the world where prairie dogs, swift foxes, black-footed ferrets and bison co-exist. 

Montana State Sen. Mike Fox (Gros Ventre), D, who served as Fort Belknapโ€™s director of Fish and Wildlife from 1991 to 2001, oversaw early efforts to restore buffalo, swift foxes and black-footed ferrets to the reservation. The goal was to โ€œcreate a steady, healthy population of native animals that were driven to extinction because of the different uses of the land,โ€ he said. โ€œLike when they started poisoning the prairie dogs off in the โ€™30s and โ€™40s and wiped out the ferrets that were native here, and the same with the swift fox. We want to make as complete an ecosystem as we can, along with the buffalo.โ€

The tribes worked with the Fish and Wildlife Service to reintroduce black-footed ferrets, and, with researchers at the Smithsonian, World Wildlife Fund and other organizations, to bring back the swift fox. The collaborators spent two years planning the swift fox capture and translocation, Shamon said, considering factors like habitat quality, community attitudes and the overall risk to a re-established population. 

Swift foxes had already been reintroduced in parts of Alberta and Saskatchewan and on the Blackfeet and Fort Peck reservations. The reintroduction at Fort Belknap continued the tribesโ€™ restoration efforts and added a possible point of connectivity for other populations. 

A Smithsonian researcher inspects a prairie dog her team trapped at American Prairie, a nature reserve in north-central Montana. Louise Johns/High Country News

Tribal members living on and near the Fort Belknap Reservation have largely supported the reintroduction of native prairie species, especially after prairie dog numbers were diminished by an outbreak of disease in the late โ€™90s, Fox said. Now that the population is recovering and has started to clear larger areas of grass, however, some tribal members who raise cattle have begun expressing frustration to the tribal council. 

โ€œWildlife and cattle will graze prairie dog colonies because of the new growth coming back throughout the year,โ€ said Fox. โ€œIt makes it look even worse because itโ€™s attractive to wildlife and domestic cattle, and they do their part. When it starts looking like a moonscape is when we get people noticing the most.โ€

He tells people that the little grass-eating rodents are necessary, and notes that the โ€œmoonscapesโ€ arenโ€™t as widespread as they may seem. But like non-Native ranchers across the West, some tribal members equate abundant prairie dogs with fewer cows. Fox doesnโ€™t believe the council will allow widespread prairie dog poisoning on tribal lands โ€” especially since the reservation now hosts black-footed ferrets โ€” but he does worry that opposition could intensify.

Bronc Speak Thunder (Assiniboine), director of the Fort Belknap Buffalo Program, has also heard people complain about prairie dogs, though he added that โ€œpeople complain about a lot of stuff.โ€

The tribes arenโ€™t actively restoring prairie dogs, he said; theyโ€™re simply refraining from poisoning and shooting them. He sees that prairie dogs benefit tribal land by creating more habitat for ground-nesting birds and serving as food for swift foxes, coyotes, hawks and eagles. They also encourage the growth of nutritious grass for bison. โ€œLike life, itโ€™s a big circle, and thatโ€™s where it fits,โ€ he said. โ€œTheyโ€™re part of the ecosystem that exists, and if you take something out, it throws everything off.โ€

Jessica Alexander, wildlife biologist with the Smithsonian, releases a swift fox into the wild on the Fort Belknap Indian Reservation. Louise Johns/High Country News

WHEN I MET Randy Matchett, the Fish and Wildlife Service biologist, he sported a cowboy hat and graying horseshoe mustache and carried a handful of Smurf-blue flea-control pellets, each slightly smaller than a marble. The pellets, which Matchett produced in his workshop at the Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Lewistown, Montana, are his latest attempt to protect prairie dogs from a fatal disease.

The pellets contain Fipronil, an insecticide used in treatments likeFrontline to keep fleas and ticks away from household pets, and are flavored with peanut butter and molasses to increase their chances of ending up in prairie dog bellies. Matchett dyes them blue because research shows prairie dogs are attracted to the color, and because the dye stains their feces, making it easy to estimate how many animals have consumed the pellets. Once ingested, Matchett hopes, his โ€œFipBitsโ€ will kill the fleas that land on and bite prairie dogs, including the fleas carrying the bacteria that causes plague. 

Yes, that plague. The bacte-ria Yersinia pestis causes bubonic plague, which became known as the Black Death after it killed at least 25 million Europeans during the 14th century.

In 1900, the disease arrived in North America via San Francisco, carried by rats stowed away on ships. During the following decades, the development of antibiotics controlled the disease in humans, but plague continued to spread among rodent species, affecting black-footed ferrets, rabbits and squirrels. First detected in prairie dogs in 1936, it devastated populations already hit hard by the conversion of the prairie to agriculture โ€” and it remains a major threat to prairie dogs.

โ€œOnce colonies have plague, they can disappear in two weeks,โ€ said Shamon. โ€œThere will be thousands of acres chirping with thousands or tens of thousands of animals and in two weeks, you will go map it, and theyโ€™re gone.โ€

A plague vaccine does exist, and is used to protect highly endangered species like black-footed ferrets. But itโ€™s simply not possible to jab every prairie dog in the West. Matchett, who as a Fish and Wildlife biologist is responsible for conserving endangered species, got involved in plague prevention in the early 1990s, initially dusting prairie dog colonies for fleas. In 2013, he began testing oral vaccines in Montana colonies, working in parallel with researchers in seven other states. The first-generation vaccines were red, peanut-butter flavored cubes with a biomarker that tinted prairie dog whiskers pink. Matchett and his colleagues in Colorado also developed vaccine pellets that they mass-produced using a Lithuanian carp bait-making machine. Matchett helped craft a pellet shooter that could be bolted to the front of a four-wheeler.

With the new vaccines primed to launch, Matchett felt hopeful. The World Wildlife Fund, which helped fund some of the work, felt hopeful, too. But in 2018, after years of trials with thousands of prairie dogs, he and other researchers concluded that even when a colony was given oral vaccinations, the number of prairie dogs that survived a plague outbreak was too small to support a black-footed ferret population. 

So Matchett pivoted. If he couldnโ€™t inoculate prairie dogs against plague, maybe he could kill the fleas that carried the bacteria. What if he could persuade prairie dogs to eat Fipronil? 

He made a new set of pellets with the same bait machine, this time using his wifeโ€™s grandmotherโ€™s Kitchen-Aid mixer to blend various types of flour, vital wheat gluten, peanut butter, molasses and other food-grade ingredients with a soupรงon of flea killer. Early results have been promising: While adult fleas arenโ€™t affected until they bite a prairie dog thatโ€™s ingested a pellet, not every flea needs to be killed; studies have shown that in general, fleas donโ€™t trigger plague outbreaks until they reach a critical mass. And flea larvae appear to die when they crawl into or consume treated prairie dog poop, suggesting that the pellets could tamp down flea reproduction as well as kill the adult insects. 

FipBits arenโ€™t the only way to reduce the toll plague takes on prairie dogs, but Matchett believes theyโ€™re the most likely to work. In his office, perched on stacks of files, are the remnants of another of his many assaults on the problem: dozens of vials of alcohol, each containing bits of prairie dog ears. In 2007 and 2008, Matchett and his colleagues collected the snippets from prairie dogs that had survived plague outbreaks, hoping genetic analysis would explain their fortitude. The material has yet to be analyzed owing to a โ€œcombination of lack of funding, interest, time and capability,โ€ Matchett said, but he hopes new funding will allow him and his collaborators to return to the project.

Despite the setbacks, Matchett believes researchers can find a way to control plague in prairie dogs. Human intolerance, as he sees it, is a more stubborn problem. Places like Fort Belknap and the Conata Basin of South Dakota โ€” where prairie dogs are, at least for now, allowed to flourish โ€” remain few and far between. 

At his shop in Lewistown, Montana, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service biologist Randy Matchett holds the flea-control pellets he hopes will help reduce the toll plague takes on prairie dogs. Louise Johns/High Country News
Matchett tests the pellet shooter he helped create (left to right). Louise Johns/High Country News

DRIVE SOUTH from Fort Belknap down Highway 191, head east on a straight gravel road, and youโ€™ll find one more place where prairie dogs are left in peace.

American Prairie began in 2001 as an effort to protect and restore Montanaโ€™s grasslands. The nonprofit now manages more than 527,000 acres of private land and federal and state leases. Its ultimate goal is to connect 3.2 million acres of prairie, providing habitat for an array of species from bison to mountain plovers to black-footed ferrets. To the casual observer, American Prairieโ€™s lands may already look like intact prairie, though ecologists like Daniel Kinka canโ€™t help noticing the nonnative crested wheatgrass and the hundreds of miles of fencing. 

โ€œThis is kind of like the Field of Dreams model: If you build it, they will come,โ€ said Kinka, American Prairieโ€™s director of rewilding. โ€œA better habitat houses more wildlife, and the wildlife that are here are perfectly capable of restoring themselves.โ€

American Prairie prohibits the poisoning and shooting of prairie dogs on its land, and it regularly hosts research projects such as the Smithsonianโ€™s burrow mapping โ€” which may help explain how plague spreads within colonies โ€” and Matchettโ€™s tests of plague-mitigation tools. Prairie dogs, said Kinka, are the โ€œunsung heroes of a prairie ecosystem,โ€ important to all the other species American Prairie is trying to foster. And as researchers have found, the woody plants that prairie dogs chew down to clear their line of sight tend to be replaced by nutritious grasses and wildflowers, suggesting that even cattle may benefit from their presence. 

The possibility that prairie dogs could be good for cattle, or at least not as bad as generally believed, is met with skepticism by American Prairieโ€™s neighbors, many of whom see the nonprofit as a threat to ranching. Signs posted along highways in Phillips County, Montana, read โ€œSave the American Cowboy. Stop American Prairie Reserve.โ€ For now, Kinka isnโ€™t trying to convince anyone to like or even appreciate prairie dogs, aiming instead for tolerance.

The black-tailed prairie dog complex studied by the Smithsonian team at American Prairie is a noisy place, filled with the barks and trills of hundreds of creatures. As I stood beside researcher Jesse Boulerice, listening, it was easy to imagine that the rodents were doing just fine. But theyโ€™re not. Will they ever be allowed to exist in numbers like this throughout their historic range?

Boulerice surveyed the surface of the colony, which was covered with dried plant nubs and bare mounds of dirt, and said he wasnโ€™t sure. 

Then he released a collared prairie dog who wagged her chubby butt in the air as she scurried into a nearby hole. She promptly popped back up, chirping out a message weโ€™ll never understand. Perhaps she was warning her colony-mates to watch out for those marshmallows and carrots; they hide a nasty trap.

Or maybe she was scolding us โ€” telling us exactly what she thought of our species before she disappeared into her burrow, leaving us to decide the future of hers.   

Prairie dogs emerge from their burrows at American Prairie. Louise Johns/High Country News

This story is part of High Country Newsโ€™ Conservation Beyond Boundaries project, which is supported by the BAND Foundation.

We welcome reader letters. Email High Country News at editor@hcn.org or submit a letter to the editor. See our letters to the editor policy.

This article appeared in the January 2025 print edition of the magazine with the headline โ€œThe prairie dog conundrum.โ€

Colorado Secures $177 Million in Federal Funding for Water Projects — #Colorado Water Conservation Board

View of Shoshone Hydroelectric Plant construction in Glenwood Canyon (Garfield County) Colorado; shows the Colorado River, the dam, sheds, a footbridge, and the workmen’s camp. Creator: McClure, Louis Charles, 1867-1957. Credit: Denver Public Library Digital Collections

Click the link to read the release on the Colorado Water Conservation Board website:

January 17, 2025โ€”The Bureau of Reclamation announced this week nearly $177 million in funding for water projects in the Upper Rio Grande and Upper Colorado River basins in Colorado. These fundsโ€”awarded from Bucket 2 Environmental Drought Mitigation (B2E) and Inflation Reduction Act programsโ€”will help Colorado better address the impacts to our water supplies and aquatic ecosystems from a hotter, drier future. The Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) shares the excitement of all the organizations receiving fundingโ€”the awards are a testament to their hard work. The CWCB is proud to have supported several of the awardees with matching funds and technical assistance while developing their applications.

โ€œWe are thrilled to see this funding go towards these critical projects in Colorado. We are particularly proud to have played a role in assisting these projects in securing funding through CWCBโ€™s grant programs including our Federal Technical Assistance Grant Program, Projects Bill Grants Program and Wildfire Ready Watershed Grants Program,โ€ said Lauren Ris, CWCB Director. โ€œBy building upon the capacity of our local partners, we provide resources and guidance to navigate complex federal funding processes.โ€

The funded projects span a diverse range of initiatives that deliver impactful outcomes for Colorado communities. CWCB funding supported applications for:

  • Upper Rio Grande Basin Drought Resiliency Activities: CWCB provided a $195,000 Local Capacity Grant to the Rio Grande Headwaters Restoration Foundation, which helped secure aย $24.9 million IRA award through the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s โ€œOther Basinsโ€ Program. These projects are essential to addressing the long-term drought and water security in the basin.ย 
  • Addressing Drought Mitigation in Southwest Colorado: CWCB provided a $156,706 Local Capacity Grant to the San Juan Resource Conservation and Development Council (in partnership with Southwestern Water Conservation District) which helped secure up to $25.6 million in B2E funding to enhance drought resilience and habitat restoration efforts in southwest Colorado.
  • Orchard Mesa Irrigation District Conveyance Upgrades for 15-Mile Reach Flow Enhancement:ย CWCB provided a $73,250 Local Capacity Grant to Farmers Conservation Alliance (in partnership with Orchard Mesa Irrigation District) which helped secure up to $10.5 million in B2E funding to modernize irrigation systems and improve water efficiency.
  • Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project:ย CWCB provided a $20 million Projects Bill Grant to the Colorado River Water Conservation District which helped secure up toย $40 million in B2E funding to acquire the Shoshone water right.ย 
  • Drought Resiliency on Western Colorado Conserved Lands:ย CWCB provided a $434,130 Local Capacity Grant to the Colorado River Water Conservation District (in partnership with Shavano Conservation District) which helped secure up to $4.6 million in B2E funding to address drought challenges in western Colorado.
  • Forest Resiliency in the Headwaters of the Colorado: CWCB provided a $93,850 Wildfire Ready Watersheds Grant to Grand County which supported the development of the โ€œGrand County Wildfire Ready Action Plan,โ€ which helped secure up to $32.6 million in multistate B2E funding for wildfire mitigation efforts.

CWCB is committed to continuing to be a partner of communities statewide so that they are best positioned to secure federal funding and implement lasting solutions for Colorado water challenges. The 2024 Federal Technical Assistance Grant cycle is completed, and more information about 2025 applications will be announced this Spring. 

Biden-Harris Administration announces new Colorado River Environmental Funding Totaling over $388.3 Million

Ducks taking flight from the Colorado River downstream of Glen Canyon Dam. Reclamation photo by Pablo Mena.

Click the link to read the release on the Reclamation website:

January 17, 2025

WASHINGTON โ€” The Bureau of Reclamation today announced initial selections under the Upper Colorado River Basin Environmental Program for a $388.3 million investment from President Bidenโ€™s Investing in America agenda to improve wildlife and aquatic habitats, ecological stability and resilience against drought. The funding supports 42 projects in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Wyoming, as well as Tribal initiatives that will provide environmental benefits or the restoration of ecosystem and natural habitats. To view a full list of projects, visit Reclamationโ€™s website. Individualized criteria for some projects are included in the descriptions at the link. 

Additionally, Reclamation announced approximately $100 Million funding opportunity for the companion program in the Lower Basin, which seeks to fund projects that provide environmental benefits in Arizona, Nevada, and California. 

โ€œThese historic environmental investments will restore and improve natural resources supporting the long-term sustainability of the Colorado River Basin, which includes nine National Parks across the seven states and is an essential habitat for more than a dozen endangered species,โ€ Commissioner Camille Calimlim Touton said.  โ€œAs we continue to develop the drought resiliency of the basin through investments in water conservation and efficiency projects, we canโ€™t forget that a sustainable basin can only exist if there is a healthy environment.โ€

 This is the first round of projects funded from the Upper Basin Environmental Drought Mitigation Program through the Inflation Reduction Act. More announcements are expected in the coming months, including projects from the most recent Upper Basin environmental announcement, which closed Jan. 10, 2025. Reclamation will begin negotiations with successful applicants to ensure funding conditions are met before funding is obligated. Funding for the Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project will not be obligated until the Colorado water court enters a final decree; in addition, the agreement will contain provisions requiring Reclamationโ€™s written consent for any water right changes. The conditions precedent set by the State of Colorado for their funding of the Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project must also be met prior to the obligation of federal funds. Funding for the Pine River Environment Drought Mitigation Project is subject to negotiation concerning operation, maintenance and replacement costs and other appropriate considerations. 

Reclamationโ€™s new funding opportunity for proposed ecosystem restoration or improvements projects in the Lower Colorado River Basin is also funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, and will consider projects that provide environmental benefits, or ecosystem and habitat restoration projects that address issues directly caused by drought in the Lower Colorado Basin Region under Phase 3 of the Lower Colorado River Basin System Conservation and Efficiency Program. Reclamation expects to announce projects by spring 2025 and award approximately $100 million for planning, design, construction, and/or implementation of projects. Project and applicant eligibility information is available on the Bureau of Reclamation website

The Biden-Harris administration has led a comprehensive effort to make Western communities more resilient to climate change and address the ongoing megadrought across the region by harnessing the full resources of President Bidenโ€™s historic Investing in America agenda. As climate change has accelerated over the past two decades, the Colorado River Basin experienced the driest period in over one thousand years. Together, the Inflation Reduction Act and Bipartisan Infrastructure Law provide the largest investment in climate resilience in our nationโ€™s history, including $15.4 billion for Western water across federal agencies to enhance the Westโ€™s resilience to drought and deliver unprecedented resources to protect the Colorado River System for all whose lives and livelihoods depend on it. This includes $5.35 billion for over 577 projects in the Colorado River Basin states.ย 


Projects in Colorado

Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project: Up to approximately $40m

Funding is provided to permanently protect the Shoshone Water Rights in the Upper Colorado River Basin to ensure a reliable water supply for ecosystem, agricultural, municipal, and recreational uses. Key components include maintaining the historical flow regime, eliminating risks of abandonment due to plant decommissioning, and facilitating instream flow use by the Colorado Water Conservation Board. Funds will not be obligated or expended until a final Colorado water court decree is entered confirming water rights and the agreement will contain provisions requiring written consent of Reclamation on any water right changes. The conditions precedent set by the State of Colorado for their funding of the Shoshone Water Rights Preservation Project must also be met prior to the obligation of federal funds.

Addressing Drought Mitigation in Southwest Colorado: Up to approximately $25.6m

Funding is provided for restoring ecosystems and improving river and connection of waterways in southwestern Colorado. It involves a collaborative effort to enhance biodiversity and water resources while supporting local communities and endangered species.

Grand Mesa and Upper Gunnison Watershed Resiliency and Aquatic Connectivity Project: Up to approximately $24.3m

Funding is provided to implement watershed restoration actions to combat drought effects in western Colorado. Through a variety of strategies, it enhances water quality, habitat resilience, and connectivity for aquatic species.

Orchard Mesa Irrigation District Conveyance Upgrades for 15-Mile Reach Flow Enhancement: Up to approximately $10.5m

Funding is provided to convert open canals into pressurized pipelines, improving water delivery efficiency and reducing environmental stressors. This upgrade supports the recovery of endangered fish species by enhancing streamflow in the critical 15-mile reach of the Colorado River.

Enhancing Aquatic Habitat in Colorado River Headwaters: Up to approximately $7m

Funding is provided to restore stream habitats along the Fraser, Blue and Colorado rivers in Grand County, enhancing aquatic ecosystems through channel shaping and bank stabilization through collaboration with key conservation partners.

Yampa River/Walton Creek Confluence Restoration Project: Up to approximately $5m

Funding is provided to restore river and wetland ecosystems in Steamboat Springs through restoration of river and floodplain habitat and the rehabilitation of riparian and wetland area thereby enhancing ecological health and promoting biodiversity. It addresses drought impacts by improving water quality, habitat complexity, and community resilience.

Drought Resiliency on Western Colorado Conserved Lands: Up to approximately $4.6m

Funding is provided to implement various ecological restoration strategies, including the restoration of wetlands, reconnection of floodplains, the installation of erosion control structures to reduce sediment transport and enhance water quality, while promoting habitat restoration for at-risk species like the yellow-billed cuckoo and Gunnison sage-grouse.

Upper Colorado Basin Aquatic Organism Passage Program: Up to approximately $4.2m

Funding is provided to restore stream habitat in Grand County, promoting biodiversity and resilience against drought conditions while enhancing habitat connectivity and improving fish passage for native species, particularly Colorado River cutthroat trout.

Conversion of Wastewater Lagoons into Wetlands: Up to approximately $3m

Funding is provided to transform outdated sewer lagoons into wetlands, enhancing biodiversity and providing habitat for migratory waterfowl and endangered fish species in the town of [Palisade]. Once completed, the wetlands will improve water quality and increase native plant diversity, recharging groundwater and supporting up to 75% of commercially harvested fish.

Fruita Reservoir Dam Removal: Up to approximately $2.8m

Funding is provided to remove a dam on Pinon Mesa, restoring wetlands and enhancing biodiversity and wildlife habitat while ensuring ecological resilience through water pooling, pipeline removal and comprehensive habitat restoration efforts.

Monitoring and Quantifying the Effectiveness of Beaver Dam Analogs on Drought Influenced Streams in the Upper Colorado River Basin: Up to approximately $1.9m

Funding is provided to restore degraded headwater meadows by implementing structures that mimic the natural functions of beaver dams. These interventions enhance ecosystem resilience, improve water retention, and support native species.

Uncompahgre Tailwater Rehabilitation Project: Up to $1.8m

Funding is provided to address habitat degradation, enhancing ecological health and recreational opportunities through rehabilitation of river habitat, restoration aging structures, and implementation of bank stabilization techniques.

Eagle River Habitat Improvement, Gypsum Ponds State Wildlife Area: Up to approximately $1.5m

Funding is provided to enhance Eagle River in Eagle County, improving fish habitat and increasing resilience to low flows and drought while supporting local ecosystems and enhancing water quality.

Orchard Mesa and Grand Valley Metering Efficiency Project: Up to approximately $1.5m

Funding is provided to enhance water management in the Grand Valley through the installation of advanced metering technology and SCADA systems. This project addresses drought conditions by improving water use efficiency and supporting local aquatic ecosystems.

Habitat Restoration in the Gunnison Basin: Up to approximately $750k

Funding is provided to restore stream habitats in the Gunnison Basin, implementing low-tech restoration structures to enhance ecosystem resilience and support habitat for the endangered Gunnison Sage-Grouse.

Cyanobacteria Monitoring and Treatment for Drought-driven Blooms in a High Elevation, Upper Colorado Reservoir to save Ecosystem Function: Up to approximately $518k

Funding is provided to restore aquatic health at Williams Fork reservoir by deploying real-time water quality monitoring tools and implementing targeted hydrogen peroxide treatments to combat algal blooms. It enhances water quality management to protect ecosystems and support community recreational activities.

Another blast of Arctic air: this time, with a stretched but strong polar vortex — NOAA

Click the link to read the article on the NOAA website (Amy Butler and Laura Ciasto):

January 16, 2025

Weโ€™re briefly popping in because another surge of very cold air looks to drop down from the Arctic over a large region of the central US this weekend and into early next week. We know that the question will be asked: is the cold related to the polar vortex this time? So here we are to provide some answers.

There are two points we want to emphasize:

1. The polar vortex strength, as measured by the speed of the winds around the 60N latitude circle and 10 hPa pressure level, remains stronger than average, and is currently forecast by most models to return to near-record strong wind speeds into early February.

Observed and forecasted (NOAA GEFSv12) wind speed in the polar vortex compared to the natural range of variability (faint blue shading). Since mid-November, the winds at 60 degrees North (the mean location of the polar vortex) have been stronger than normal. According to the GEFSv12 forecast issued on January 15 2025, those winds are forecast to remain stronger than normal for at least the next few weeks (bold red line). NOAA Climate.gov image, adapted from original by Laura Ciasto.

Normally, if the polar vortex is communicating with the surface, which it finally has been in the last couple of days, a strong polar vortex would be associated with persistent warmth over much of Europe, Asia, and the eastern US. (A strong polar vortex is usually associated with a northward shifted jet stream that keeps the coldest air corralled over the pole.) Europe and Asia are indeed anticipating warmer than average conditions next week, but not the US. So something else is going on over the US that is overwhelming the โ€œstrong polar vortexโ€ signal.

2. We discussed how we didnโ€™t think the shape or stretching of the polar vortex contributed to the last cold air outbreak, because in the lower stratosphere the vortex was shifted towards Asia and not stretched over North America. However, in this case, the vortex is actually forecast to stretch throughout its entire depth (10-30 miles above the surface) over Canada and the Hudson Bay. So unlike last week, this time the stretched out polar vortex may be associated with the forecasted southward shift of the jet stream, which allows the troposphereโ€™s cold Arctic air to spill into the continental US.

The forecasted structure of the tropospheric jet stream (yellow) and several levels of the stratospheric polar vortex from the lower stratosphere to the upper stratosphere in the NOAA GFS model for 17 January 2025 (initialized on 16 January 2025). The contours show how the stretched polar vortex corresponds to the southward shift of the jet stream over North America. NOAA Climate.gov image, adapted from original by Laura Ciasto.

However, we want to reemphasize that โ€œassociated withโ€ still does not mean one thing caused another, and in this case, itโ€™s still difficult to understand what is causing what. Additionally, a strong ridge of high pressure has been building up simultaneously near Alaska, which can also help force the jet stream to dive down south over the continental US and bring cold Arctic air with it, independent of the polar vortex.

Downstream of a “ridge” over Alaska, the jet stream (the winds at the 250-millibar pressure level) is forecasted to make a deep dip (known as a “trough” to meteorologists) into the United States over the weekend of January 18, 2025, according to NOAA’s Global Forecast System. NOAA Climate.gov animation based on a screen recording from theย Earth Null School website.

To sum up: Unlike last time (Jan 5-7), the stretching of the polar vortex is extending through the entire column and is โ€œin-syncโ€ with the extension of the jet. But we donโ€™t know the directionality (what caused what), and other tropospheric factors like the strong Alaskan ridging are definitely big players. And while things are more in-line this time, cold air outbreaks donโ€™t only happen because of the polar vortex.

#Colorado in 2024: fourth warmest year on record: Just 2 all-time lows compared to 120 all-time highs — Allen Best (BigPivots.com) #ActOnClimate

Click the link to read the article on the Big Pivots website (Allen Best):

January 11, 2025

It was another warm year in Colorado, part of a theme. Russ Schumacher, the state climatologist, reports 2024 was the 4th warmest on record, 3 degrees warmer than the 20th century average when temperatures across the state were averaged for the year.

Eight of the 10 warmest years in Coloradoโ€™s recorded history have been since 2012.

From his base in Akron, 115 miles northeast of Denver, Joel Schneekloth observed temperatures that fit in with this trend.

โ€œWe really had warm days but even warmer nights,โ€ reported Schneekloth, who is a regional water specialist with the Colorado Water Institute. โ€œBut we didnโ€™t have a string of 100 degree days like we had in 2012 and 2002. We had 100 just once or twice this year.โ€

To be clear, it can still get cold in Colorado. This is not quite up to Lake Wobegon standards, where all the children are above average. But all the action has been on the high side of the thermometer โ€” or on the lack of cold.. That was particularly true in December.

The Colorado Climate Center reported 120 new all-time high temperatures along with 25 tied records. Nights, as Schneekloth noted, were also warm. There were 129 records for the high minimum temperature.

On the flip side, it had two all-time cold temperatures.

Notable was the warmth of December. โ€œIt was very warm across Colorado, or perhaps more accurately, there was a distinct lack of cold,โ€ Schumacher wrote.

โ€œIt really was the lack of any real cold in December that led to the record-breaking temperatures for the month,โ€ he told Big Pivots.

โ€œHighs in the low 70s arenโ€™t especially remarkable in December, but many stations set records for the warmest low temperature for December. For example, at Sedgwick, the lowest temperature in December was 11F โ€“ the previous warmest low temperature for December was 9F. This is true at numerous stations in northeastern Colorado. Fort Collins only got down to 15 in December. The previous record  was 12 Akron only got to 10; the previous record was 8.โ€

At many stations, the second or third warmest low for December was just the previous year (2023), a December with a similar lack of cold.

Precipitation, on the other hand, was above average statewide but not abnormally so, 35th wettest in records across the past 130 years. The story of rain and snow, however, was not uniform. The southern San Luis Valley had its wettest calendar year on record. Lands north of Fort Collins and Greeley, along the Wyoming border, much drier than average.

Congressional delays cause uncertainty for water conservation program: Upper #Colorado River Commission not yet accepting applications for System Conservation in 2025 — Heather Sackett (AspenJournalism.org) #ColoradoRiver #COriver #aridification #CRWUA2024

These hay bales stand ready to be collected on a ranch outside of Carbondale in July 2024. A program that pays irrigators in the Upper Colorado River Basin to cut back is facing uncertainty in 2025 because of Congressional delays.ย Credit:ย Heather Sackett/Aspen Journalism

Click the link to read the article on the Aspen Journalism website (Heather Sackett):

January 11, 2025

A federally funded water conservation program in the Upper Colorado River Basin is facing uncertainty for 2025 after the bill to authorize funding for it stalled in Congress late last year.

On Friday, Upper Colorado River Commission Executive Director Chuck Cullom said the commission planned to communicate to participants in the 2024 System Conservation Pilot Program that the UCRC is not accepting applications at this time for a 2025 program. Officials will let people know later this month if and when the application process will open for 2025. 

According to a post on the UCRCโ€™s website, which has since been removed, applications were potentially going to be available Jan. 9, with a now-cancelled informational webinar scheduled for Jan. 10. 

Officials are holding out hope that the program can still get federal authorization in time for water users โ€” mostly farmers and ranchers โ€” in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming to conserve water during the upcoming growing season. 

โ€œThe commission recognizes that SCPP has been an important and useful tool for the Upper Basin to understand the opportunities and issues that conservation programs represent,โ€ Cullom said. โ€œWe are hopeful we will have that tool available in 2025 and again in 2026.โ€

The System Conservation Pilot Program, which pays water users who volunteer to cut back, was restarted in 2023 as part of the Upper Basinโ€™s 5-Point Plan, designed to protect critical infrastructure from plummeting reservoir levels. Over two years, the program spent about $45 million to save about 101,000 acre-feet of water. Funding for SCPP comes from $125 million allocated through the Inflation Reduction Act.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s authorization to spend this money expired in December and now must be renewed if the program is to continue.

Anthony Rivera-Rodriguez, a press secretary with the office of U.S. Sen. John Hickenlooper, D-Colo., said lawmakers plan to introduce a new bill for funding authorization in the next couple of weeks. He said funding for Western drought programs has not been controversial and has received bipartisan support. The authorization didnโ€™t pass in December, he said, because lawmakers simply ran out of time before the end of the session. The Colorado Sun reported last month that the Senate passed the Colorado River Basin System Conservation Extension Act, but the House of Representatives โ€œleft it on the chopping block as lawmakers raced to pass legislation to avoid a government shutdown.โ€

โ€œWe are trying to get this authorized as soon as we possibly can,โ€ Rivera-Rodriguez said.

SCPP has been dogged by controversy since it was rebooted in 2023. The program originally took place from 2015 to 2018. 

SCPP has been criticized for aย lack of transparencyย in the 2023 program, not measuring and tracking how much of the conserved water eventually makes it to Lake Powell, and for its potential negative impacts, in general, to the agricultural communities of the Western Slope and, in particular, to anย irrigation company in the Grand Valley. In response to the second criticism, officials are working on how Upper Basin states could โ€œget creditโ€ for conserved water through aย memorandum of understandingย with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.

Delta County farmer Paul Kehmeier kneels by gated pipes in his familyโ€™s alfalfa field. Kehmeier participated in the 2024 System Conservation Pilot Program and said he would again in 2025 if funding is reauthorized by Congress. Credit: Natalie Keltner-McNeil/Aspen Journalism

Whether reauthorization will come quickly enough for Upper Basin agricultural producers to participate in the upcoming irrigation season remains to be seen. Short notice and a hasty rollout of SCPP for the 2023 growing season meant low participation numbers for that year, with just 66 water-saving projects and about 38,000 acre-feet conserved across the four Upper Basin states. The number of projects in 2024 jumped to 109, with about 64,000 acre-feet conserved.

A last-minute reprieve for the program wouldnโ€™t be a problem for one Delta County rancher who participated in SCPP in 2024. Paul Kehmeier enrolled 58 acres of his ranch in the program last year and said he plans to participate again if the program is extended. 

โ€œThere are two reasons that Iโ€™m planning to participate,โ€ Kehmeier said. โ€œOne is that the money is very good, and second is that I donโ€™t think we in the Upper Basin can stick our heads in the sand on all this big river stuff. โ€ฆ My irrigation season starts April 1, so anytime up until the last day of March, if I had a chance to participate, I would jump at the chance.โ€

The reauthorization of System Conservation comes at a pivotal moment for water users on the Colorado River. Negotiations between the Upper Basin states and the Lower Basin states (California, Arizona, Nevada) on how shortages will be shared after 2026 have ground to a halt. Lower Basin water managers say all seven states that use the Colorado River must share cuts under the driest conditions, while Upper Basin officials maintain they already take cuts in dry years because they are squeezed by climate change and canโ€™t rely on the massive storage buckets of Lake Powell and Lake Mead for their water supply. Upper Basin leaders also maintain that they shouldnโ€™t have to share additional cuts because their states have never used the entire 7.5 million-acre-foot apportionment given to them by the Colorado River Compact, while the Lower Basin regularly uses its full allotment.

But there has been a recognition in recent months by some Upper Basin officials that their states will have to participate in some kind of future conservation program โ€” SCPP or otherwise โ€” on a river whose flows have declined over the past two decades due to drought and climate change. 

โ€œAs we get more familiar with this, maybe that can be ramped up to 100,000, 200,000 (acre-feet), I donโ€™t know,โ€ Esteban Lopez, the UCRC commissioner from New Mexico, told attendees at the December Colorado River Water Users Association Conference in Las Vegas. โ€œMaybe we can get there, maybe we canโ€™t. But the point is: We will conserve and we will commit to conserve what we can conserve when thereโ€™s water available and put it in an account in Lake Powell.โ€

This story ran in the Jan. 12 edition of The Aspen Times and SkyHi News.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

U.S. Representative Joe Neguse Announces $2.4 Million in Infrastructure Funding for Water Resiliency & Restoration Projects in Grand and Boulder Counties

Colorado Rivers. Credit: Geology.com

January 10, 2025

Lafayette, CO โ€” Today, House Assistant Minority Leader Joe Neguse, Co-Chair of the Colorado River Caucus, announced $2.4 million from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for two projects in Coloradoโ€™s 2nd District aimed at restoring and improving the ecological conditions of local waterways and aquatic habitat near the communities of Granby and Boulder. These investments were allocated by the Bureau of Reclamationโ€™s WaterSMART Environmental Water Resources Projects program.

โ€œLocal communities are instrumental in protecting and restoring Coloradoโ€™s rivers and streams. This important funding will support locally driven projects that enhance watershed health and resiliency, restore ecological conditions, and embody the spirit of ecological stewardship,โ€ said Assistant Leader Neguse. 

โ€œColorado is focused on protecting our vital water sources so that there is plenty of clean water for our communities and environment. I applaud Rep. Neguse’s leadership in Congress to pass federal legislation that is delivering for Colorado, and thank our State agencies and Coloradans carrying out these important projects,โ€ said Governor Jared Polis.

Projects in Coloradoโ€™s 2nd Congressional District include the Upper Colorado River Ecosystem Enhancement Project, managed by the Grand County Learning By Doing Cooperative Effort (LBD), and the Boulder Creek Headwaters Resiliency Project, led by the Boulder Watershed Collective. Additional information on both can be found HERE and below: 

  • $1,425,859ย for the Upper Colorado River Ecosystem Enhancement Project, to restore two stream reaches on the Fraser River and Willow Creek near the community of Granby.ย 
  • $954,204ย for the Boulder Creek Headwaters Resiliency Project, to restore and improve the ecological condition of 181 acres of degraded aquatic and riparian habitat, and 2.8 miles of wet meadow streams throughout the Boulder Creek Watershed near Boulder.ย 

โ€œThis is just another great example of the successful collaboration taking place in Grand County across a wide range of stakeholders that is resulting in very tangible improvements in the ecological health of the Colorado River headwaters,โ€ according to a statement from the Grand County Learning By Doing Management Committee. 

โ€œThe projects selected are working through a collaborative process to achieve nature-based solutions for the health of our watersheds and river ecosystems to increase drought resiliency,โ€ said Reclamation Commissioner Camille Calimlim Touton. โ€œThis historic investment from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law gives Reclamation the opportunity to continue to collaborate with our stakeholders to leverage funds for these multi-benefit projects.โ€

โ€œDenver Water is proud to support ongoing stream improvement projects like those to be funded in this latest round of federal funding. Congratulations to Grand County Learning by Doing on this award. We look forward to working with our partners on the upcoming restoration work to Willow Creek and the Fraser River to benefit the Colorado River Basin,โ€ said Rick Marsicek, Chief of Water Resource Strategy at Denver Water.

Background

Assistant Leader Joe Neguse, whose district includes the headwaters of the Colorado River, has been steadfast in his efforts to address water-related issues, working to enact significant bills that invest in drought resilience and water management, while providing environmental benefits. Most recently, President Joe Biden signed his bill to extend authorization for the highly successful Upper Colorado and San Juan River Basins Endangered Fish Recovery Programs into law. Neguse also recently enacted the Drought Preparedness Act and Water Monitoring and Tracking Essential Resources (WATER) Data Improvement Act

As co-founder and Co-Chair of the Congressional Colorado River Caucus, Neguse has brought together a bipartisan mix of lawmakers each representing a state along the Colorado River Basin. The group is working to build consensus on critical issues plaguing the river and support the work of the Colorado River Basin states on how best to address the worsening levels of drought in the Colorado River Basin. 

The Rocky Mountains have gotten near-average snow this year. So, why are forecasts for #LakePowell inflows so low? — The Salt Lake Tribune #snowpack #runoff

Westwide SNOTEL basin-filled map January 16, 2025 via the NRCS.

Click the link to read the article on The Salt Lake Tribune website (Anastasia Hufham). Here’s an excerpt:

January 15, 2025

Snowpack levels across the Upper Colorado River Basin are close to average for this time of year, but forecasters say that might not translate to a comfortable year for the Colorado River…Moser reported that snow levels above Lake Powell, which straddles Utahโ€™s shared state line with Arizona, are 94% of average as of Jan. 1. (โ€œAverage,โ€ in forecasting, refers to the average precipitation between 1991 and 2020.) But forecasters currently predict that runoff into the reservoir between April and July will only be 81% of the thirty-year average. Thatโ€™s a drop from theย December forecast, which projected inflows of 92% of average…

Utahโ€™s soil moisture is also below average and worse than it was this time last year. That could impact how much water reaches the Colorado River and Lake Powell, since dry soil absorbs melting snow, leaving less water to run off mountains and into reservoirs this spring. In terms of actual water, 81% of normal runoff into Lake Powell between April and July is 5.15 million acre-feet; the median runoff over the last thirty years has been 6.13 million acre-feet.

Video: “Shoshone: The River’s Sentinel” — The #ColoradoRiver District #COriver #aridification

The Shoshone hydro plant in Glenwood Canyon. The River District has made a deal with Xcel Energy to buy the water rights associated with the plant to keep water flowing on the Western Slope. Credit: Heather Sackett/Aspen Journalism

The century-old water rights of the Shoshone Power Plant are essential to maintaining the flow and vitality of Colorado’s namesake river. The Colorado River District, alongside a diverse coalition of supporters, is working tirelessly to safeguard this critical resource, ensuring its benefits endure for ecosystems, communities, and future generations across Coloradoโ€™s Western Slope. Learn more at keepshoshoneflowing.org Learn more about the Colorado River District at ColoradoRiverDistrict.org

#Drought news January 16, 2025: D1 was expanded across southwestern #Colorado due to low snow water equivalent and 60-day SPI

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

On January 9 and 10, a low pressure system tracked along the Gulf Coast and resulted in widespread precipitation (1 to 2.5 inches, liquid equivalent) from eastern Texas and the Lower Mississippi Valley east to the Florida Panhandle. On the northern extent of this storm, snow blanketed areas from Oklahoma and Arkansas to north Georgia. This precipitation during the second week of January supported drought improvement. However, drought expanded and intensified for the Florida Peninsula, eastern North Carolina, west-central Texas, and the Southwest. During the first two weeks of January, multiple Arctic surface highs shifted south from Canada and temperatures (January 1-13) averaged 4 to 8 degrees F below normal for much of the Great Plains, Middle to Lower Mississippi Valley, and Southeast. A very dry start to the wet season continued to affect southern California with worsening drought conditions, periodic Santa Ana winds, and large wildfires. Enhanced trade winds, typical during a La Niรฑa winter, resulted in improving drought for the windward side of the Hawaiian Islands…

High Plains

The Central High Plains continued to have worsening drought conditions and moderate drought (D1) was expanded across portions of southwestern Nebraska using 60-day SPI, soil moisture below the 10th percentile, and the NDMC short-term blend. Although light precipitation (less than 0.5 inch, liquid equivalent) fell across parts of south-central to southeastern Kansas, this precipitation was too low to justify any improvements. Elsewhere, across the Central to Northern Great Plains, no changes were made as early to mid-January is a dry time of year. D1 was expanded across southwestern Colorado due to low snow water equivalent and 60-day SPI…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 14, 2025.

West

Severe drought (D2) was expanded to include all of southern California due to the very dry start to the water year to date (WYTD) from October 1, 2024 to January 13, 2025. The D2 coverage coincides with where WYTD precipitation has averaged less than 5 percent of normal. [ed. emphasis mine] A number of locations, including San Diego, are having their driest start to the water year. The D2 covers Los Angeles and Ventura counties which are being affected by periodic Santa Ana winds drying out vegetation and large wildfires. Following the two wet winters, the large reservoirs throughout California are at or above-normal. Based on 90-day SPI, declining soil moisture, and low snow water equivalent, a 1-category degradation was warranted for parts of Arizona and southwestern Utah. A mix of improvements and degradations were made to Idaho and the depiction is generally consistent with the 2024-2025 WYTD precipitation and snowpack. Eastern Washington and much of Oregon are drought-free, but low snowpack supports moderate drought (D1) along the northern Cascades of Washington. A 1-category improvement was justified for a portion of central Montana, based on 90-day SPEI along with snow water equivalent (SWE) above the 75th percentile. As of January 14, SWE was above-normal (period of record: 1991-2020) across the southern Cascades along with eastern Oregon and southwestern Idaho. SWE varies for the Sierra Nevada Mountains, those numbers are beginning to decrease after a drier-than-normal start to January. SWE remained well below-normal across the Four Corners Region…

South

More than 1 to 1.5 inches of precipitation (liquid equivalent) supported improvements for portions of eastern Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. The small areas of severe drought (D2) were discontinued in northeastern Mississippi due to: 28-day average streamflows near the 20th percentile, soil moisture recovery, and a consensus of SPIs in D1 at worst. In addition, there is no support for maintaining D2 in the NDMC short- and long-term blends. Precipitation during the first two weeks of January resulted in a slight reduction in extreme drought (D3) across south-central Tennessee. For central Texas which received generous precipitation for this time of year, low 28-day streamflows (below the 20th percentile in D1 and 10th percentile in D2) precluded a larger area for a 1-category improvement. D2 to D3 drought was expanded across the Edwards Plateau of Texas due to 28-day average streamflows below the 10th and 5th percentile, respectively…

Looking Ahead

Another Arctic air outbreak is forecast for the central and eastern U.S. during mid-January as surface high pressure shifts south from Canada. By January 20, subzero minimum temperatures are expected as far south as the Central Great Plains, Middle Mississippi Valley, and Ohio Valley. During January 16-20, little to no precipitation is forecast from the West Coast to the Mississippi Valley with light to moderate precipitation amounts (0.5 to 1 inch) limited to the Southeast. These amounts, however, have been sufficient for rainfall to almost keep up with demand, and the near-normal amounts the past 2 weeks have kept the area out of D0 conditions for the time being, but the situation needs to be closely monitored for signs of increasing dryness impacts. Daily rainfall reports are not available for Mili since the start of January 2025, but 45.59โ€ fell during October-December 2024, above the normal of 36.55โ€ and well above the amount needed to keep up with demand, which is sufficient to keep D0 conditions at bay regardless the rainfall during the past 2 weeks.

The Climate Prediction Centerโ€™s 6-10 day outlook (valid January 21-25, 2025) favors below-normal temperatures to persist for much of the contiguous U.S. with the largest below-normal temperature probabilities (exceeding 80 percent) extending from the Mid-Atlantic and Ohio Valley south to the Gulf Coast. Elevated above-normal precipitation probabilities are forecast for the northern Great Plains, Gulf Coast, and portions of the Southeast. Below-normal precipitation is favored for the West, Central Great Plains, Midwest, and New England.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 14, 2025.

Record precipitation in 2024 gave little relief to irrigators: Most of the water ended up in the soil, not the unconfined aquifer — @AlamosaCitizen #RioGrande #SanLuisValley

Gauging station near Mogote on the Conejos River. Record precipitation did not translate to record river flows. Credit: The Citizen

Click the link to read the article on the Alamosa Citizen website:

January 15, 2025

Alamosa never gets 16 inches of total precipitation in a year. Never. Ever. Except that it did in 2024. 

Turns out, 2024 was among the wettest on record across the San Luis Valley going back to 1895, with all six counties registering historic levels of precipitation. Here are the precipitation totals by county, according to data from the NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information:

  • Alamosa County, 16.75 inches
  • Conejos County, 24.29 inches
  • Costilla County, 22.53 inches
  • Mineral County, 32.60 inches
  • Rio Grande County, 19.66 inches
  • Saguache County, 21.86 inches

The headscratching is how so much moisture was realized in a year when the unconfined aquifer of the Upper Rio Grande Basin dropped to near its lowest level, which became problematic for irrigators who are under orders by the state of Colorado to reduce their groundwater pumping to help recover the ailing aquifer.

โ€œTwo things,โ€ said Cleave Simpson, general manager of the Rio Grande Water Conservation District and local hay grower. โ€œWe didnโ€™t have continuous steady snowpack in the winter months that put us in a good position, and then the volume of snow we got was on top of drier conditions last fall where moisture, instead of showing up in a stream, ends up in the ground in soil conditions.

โ€œSo to that end, this year at my farm in October, I get an inch and a half of rain, in October. That never, ever happens. So the hope is then, that nice soil moisture that we got in October will set us up for success.โ€

Craig Cotten, division engineer for the Colorado Division of Water Resources, said the wet 2024 was a boon to local farmers and their efforts to recover the Valleyโ€™s aquifers. What it didnโ€™t do was increase the amount of water stored in reservoirs.

โ€œThe reservoirs in the Rio Grande Basin in Colorado typically store water in winter when the senior priority ditches are shut off. The reservoirs can also store during the irrigation season, but only if there is a significant amount of water in the rivers to serve not only the irrigation ditches but the reservoirs as well,โ€ said Cotten.

โ€œThis typically requires very high river flows, which did not occur in 2024 even with the rain events that were the primary reason for the high precipitation total in 2024. The significant rains in the Rio Grande Basin did increase the river flows, but not enough to get the reservoirs into priority. The increase in reservoir storage in 2024 was about typical of what occurs in an average year.โ€

Without the high levels of precipitation in 2024, the critical unconfined aquifer was in danger of falling to a level of storage nobody was expecting to see after years of irrigators working to reduce their groundwater pumping.

Colorado precipitation for the 12 months ending January 15, 2024. Credit: High Plains Regional Climate Center.

โ€œThe large amount of precipitation in the Rio Grande Basin during the summer of 2024 helped the unconfined aquifer in multiple ways,โ€ said Cotten. โ€œThis precipitation increased the streamflow in the Rio Grande throughout the summer, allowing the ditches and canals to divert more water than they otherwise would have.

โ€œThis increased diversion in turn allowed delivery of a higher amount of water into recharge pits and the aquifer. The precipitation also helped to meet the irrigation needs of the crops, allowing the farmers to not pump their wells as much as they would otherwise.โ€

The hope among local farmers is that the wet fall months of 2024, when October and November delivered more than 11 inches of snow, will translate into an above-average spring runoff and give a boost to surface water coming into the Valley in 2025.

Rio Grande and Pecos River basins. Map credit: By Kmusser – Own work, Elevation data from SRTM, drainage basin from GTOPO [1], U.S. stream from the National Atlas [2], all other features from Vector Map., CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11218868

Research letter: Crowdsourced Data Reveal Shortcomings in Precipitation Phase Products for Rain and Snow Partitioning — AGU

Figure 1: The sample size and spatial distribution of the MRoS data across ecoregions within CONUS. The gray shaded area represents the high-resolution (250 m) global mountains version 3 derived from terrain characteristics (Karagulle et al., 2017; referred to as K3 mountains). The level-3 code for each ecoregion is also shown and they are: 1-Coast Range, 2-Puget Lowlands, 3-Willamette Valley, 4-Cascades, 5-Sierra Nevada, 8-Southern California Mountains, 9-Eastern Cascade Slopes and Foothills, 12-Snake River Plain, 13-Central Basin and Range, 14-Mojave Basin and Range, 15-Northern Rockies, 16-Idaho Batholith, 17-Middle Rockies, 18-Wyoming Basin, 20-Colorado Plateaus, 21-Southern Rockies, 25-High Plains, 26-Southwestern Tablelands, 43-Northwestern Great Plains, 58-Northeastern Highlands, 59-Northeastern Coastal Zone, 60-Northern Allegheny Plateau, 78- Klamath Mountains, and 83-Eastern Great Lakes Lowlands.

Click the link to access the letter on the AGU website (Guo Yu,ย Keith S. Jennings,ย Benjamin J. Hatchett,ย Anne W. Nolin,ย Nayoung Hur,ย Meghan Collins,ย Anne Heggli,ย Sonia Tonino,ย Monica M. Arienzo). Here’s the abstract:

December 23, 2024

Reanalysis products support our understanding of how the precipitation phase influences hydrology across scales. However, a lack of validation data hinders the evaluation of a reanalysis-estimated precipitation phase. In this study, we used a novel dataset from the Mountain Rain or Snow (MRoS) citizen science project to compare 39,680 MRoS observations from January 2020 to July 2023 across the conterminous United States (CONUS) to assess three precipitation phase products. These products included the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA-2), and the North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS-2). The overall critical success indices for detecting rainfall (snowfall) for IMERG, MERRA-2, and NLDAS-2 were 0.51 (0.79), 0.49 (0.77), and 0.54 (0.53), respectively. These indices show that IMERG and MERRA-2 reasonably classify snowfall, whereas NLDAS-2 overestimates rainfall. All products performed poorly in detecting subfreezing rainfall and snowfall above 2ยฐC. Therefore, crowdsourced data provides a unique validation source to improve the capabilities of reanalysis products.

Key Points

  • The Mountain Rain or Snow citizen science project collected a novel dataset of 39,680 observations of precipitation phases across the US
  • The precipitation reanalysis products performed poorly in detecting subfreezing rainfall and snowfall above 2ยฐC
  • The crowdsourced data provides a unique validation source to improve the capabilities of reanalysis products

Plain Language Summary

Distinguishing between rain and snow is challenging. This study used a unique crowdsourced dataset from the Mountain Rain or Snow (MRoS) project to allow researchers to better assess the accuracy of reanalysis products used to differentiate rain from snow. We compared the citizen science data with results from three reanalysis products. We found that these reanalysis products all performed poorly in detecting rainfall at subfreezing rainfall or snowfall at warmer air temperatures. Crowdsourced data could help enhance methods used to determine precipitation phases and improve real-time weather forecasts.

Forecast: #ColoradoRiver flow to #LakePowell will only reach 81% of normal in 2025 — 8NewsNow.com #COriver #aridification #GunnisonRiver

A Reclamation map, released January 10, 2025, of the upper basin showed snowpack levels โ€” more specifically, snow water equivalent (SWE) levels โ€” at 93% of normal for this time of year.

Click the link to read the article on the 8NewsNow.com website (Greg Haas). Here’s an excerpt:

January 10, 2025

An early season forecast indicates Lake Powell will get only about 81% of its normal water flow because of dry conditions around much of the Upper Colorado River Basin. Officials emphasized that forecasts this early can be inaccurate, and they represent the โ€œmost probableโ€ conditions identified by the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center (CBRFC), part of the National Weather Service. The forecast was based on data collected up until Jan. 1. Lake Powell, the nationโ€™s second-largest reservoir, is currently 37% full, according to the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation…

The Lake Powell forecast is a summary of the hydrologic conditions throughout the entire Upper Colorado River Basin,โ€ Cody Moser, a hydrologist with CBRFC said. โ€œLake Powell forecasting 5,150 KAF โ€” or thousand-acre-feet โ€” which is 81% of the 1991 through 2020 normal.โ€ Graphics showed the normal flow at 6,300 KAF.

The CBRFC briefing on Friday estimated the flow into Lake Powell would be below normal levels, despite good conditions in two regions that are crucial to the Colorado Riverโ€™s water supply โ€” the Colorado Headwaters and the Gunnison region.

#Colorado to start regulating emission of 5 air toxics that make people sick: The new regulations will be rolled out in phases over the course of 2025 and into 2026 — The #Denver Post

Metro wastewater plant in Denver.

Click the link to read the article on The Denver Post website (Noelle Phillips). Here’s an excerpt:

January 13, 2025

Five new compounds soon will be listed as priority toxic air contaminants in Colorado and, over the next two years, the stateโ€™sย Department of Public Health and Environmentย andย Air Quality Control Commissionย will determine out how to regulate them. The stateโ€™sย Air Pollution Control Divisionย will recommend five compounds to be regulated to the commission during its two meetings that begin Thursday. The creation of the list of toxic air contaminants is the result of a years-long effort from environmentalists and public health advocates who want the state to do more to protect people from the pollution that can cause cancers, such as leukemia and lymphoma, and lung diseases, such as asthma, and can harm womenโ€™s reproductive health. For years, environmentalists have complained that air pollution permits issued by the federal and state governments allow companies to pollute with little attention given to how much of those contaminants are dangerous to human health…

The five toxic air contaminants beingย proposed for regulationย are:

  • Acrolein, which is created when fossil fuels are burned by wood-burning, industrial boilers and reciprocating engines, and it is also used to make a polymer for paints, coatings and adhesives. Acute, short-term inhalation can cause eye and respiratory tract irritation. It is not considered a cancer risk.
  • Benzene, a carcinogen released when fossil fuels are burned, including in car exhaust and oil and gas extraction and production. It also is created by cement manufacturing, waste disposal and wood burning. Acute exposure may cause drowsiness, dizziness and headaches, as well as eye, skin and respiratory tract irritation, and unconsciousness at high levels. Chronic inhalation has caused cancer, various blood disorders and affects womenโ€™s reproductive organs, the Environmental Protection Agency has reported.
  • Ethylene oxide, which is used to make other products such as antifreeze, textiles, adhesives, plastics and detergents. Itโ€™s used to sterilize medical equipment, including atย Terumo BTC in Lakewood to sanitize medical equipment. It causes cancers in humans, including lymphoma, myeloma, leukemia and breast cancer.
  • Hydrogen sulfide, highly toxic gas that smells like rotten eggs. It is released by wastewater treatment facilities, meat processing facilities, petroleum refining, manufacturing of asphalt and roofing material and places where large quantities of manure are stored. It can cause people to pass out due to high exposure. Low exposure can cause headaches, memory loss, balance problems and fatigue. It is not considered a carcinogen but data is limited on how it affects childrenโ€™s health or womenโ€™s reproductive health, according to the EPA.
  • Hexavalent chromiumย is a by-product of industrial processes such as metal fabricating and by burning coal for electricity. It can leak into water systems and into the air. It can cause cancer and impact the respiratory system, kidneys, liver, skin and eyes, the EPAโ€™s website says.

Meet the Navajo professor mapping the impact of climate change on Indigenous land — Boise State Public Radio

Michael Charles. Photo credit: Cornell University

Click the link to read the article on the Boise State Public Radio website (Daniel Spaulding). Here’s an excerpt:

January 13, 2025

Rising seas are forcing Indigenous communities to move. Higher temperatures are causing drought and loss of traditional foods. Michael Charles, a Navajo professor at Cornell University, is trying to quantify the impact of climate change on Indigenous life in North America. Our Living Lands producer Daniel Spaulding spoke to Charles about his work. Charlesโ€™ย researchย includes a number of environmental issues impacting Indigenous communities, including air pollution, mining, and migration. To do this, Charles is focusing on Indigenous knowledge of traditional foods, land, and climate patterns.

โ€œWe’ll continue to see those knowledge systems evolving, but we’re also going to see continued disconnect on how well we can use our past knowledge systems,โ€ Charles said. โ€œSo it’s going to be an interesting path forward to see how we adapt and evolve.โ€

Peggy Mott selected to lead Reclamationโ€™s Dam Safety Program: Reclamationโ€™s Dam Safety Program evaluates existing dams for safety concerns and implements proactive solutions when needed

Peggy Mott, P.E. Photo credit: Reclamation

Click the link to read the release on the Reclamation website:

January 13, 2025

DENVER โ€” The Bureau of Reclamation selected Peggy Mott, P.E., as the chief of dam safety. Mott will oversee Reclamationโ€™s Dam Safety Program and is responsible for Reclamationโ€™s high hazard potential dams. If these dams were to fail or were improperly operated could result in loss of life or significant economic loss. This oversight ensures Reclamationโ€™s dams do not present an unreasonable risk to people, property or the environment. 

Key for the success for Reclamationโ€™s Dam Safety Program is leveraging relationships throughout Reclamation and with stakeholders. One close relationship the Dam Safety Office maintains is with the Asset Management Division, another office within the Dam Safety and Infrastructure Directorate. 

โ€œThe Dam Safety and Infrastructure Directorate provides reliable stewardship and oversight of Reclamationโ€™s diverse infrastructure portfolio. We effectively manage risk and maximize the value of Reclamationโ€™s assets for our stakeholders and American public,โ€ said Dam Safety and Infrastructure Director Miguel Rocha. โ€œPeggyโ€™s experience across multiple domains will be valuable as she takes on this important role leading the program and working with our local, regional, and national partners.โ€  

Mott joined Reclamation 2019 in the Dam Safety Office as a program manager and supervisory civil engineer. Prior to joining Reclamation, Mott was a regional dam safety officer with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Prior to joining federal government, she worked with dams and dam safety with the Colorado Department of Natural Resources. She also served as the State Buildings Delegate for the capital construction and controlled maintenance program for the Colorado Department of Human Services. Mott began her career as a systems engineer for Lockheed-Martin. 

Mott earned a Bachelor of Science in Engineering Physics from the Colorado School of Mines and a Master of Science in Civil Engineering from the University of Colorado. She is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Colorado. 

Supreme Court rejects #Utah, #Wyoming claims on federal public lands — Angus M. Thuermer Jr. (WyoFile.com)

US Flag at Hoover Dam as the Olympic Torch passed over the dam in 1996

Click the link to read the article on the WyoFile.com website (Angus M. Thuermer Jr.):

January 14, 2025

It took the U.S. Supreme Court 12 words and one period to dismiss more than 300 pages of legal arguments in which Utah, Wyoming and other Western states sought to establish control and ownership of millions of acres of federally managed public land.

Utah, Wyomingโ€™s lone U.S. Rep. Harriet Hageman, state legislators, Gov. Mark Gordon and many others sought an emergency hearing to argue that the federal government illegally owns property that rightfully belongs to Western states. Wyoming and other parties filed briefs of their own supporting the Beehive Stateโ€™s assertion that federal ownership was detrimental to those commonwealths.

The filings appear to be unappreciated by the justices.

โ€œThe motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied,โ€ the court said in an order filed Monday.

Utahโ€™s petition generated another 424 pages of legal entreaties by its supporters and critics, a count that includes rebuttals by the United States and the Ute Tribe.

Utah claimed the federal government could not own and control โ€œunappropriated lands,โ€ which are those not specifically designated for use by an enumerated federal power. Utah targeted 18.5 million acres of Bureau of Land Management property belonging to all Americans.

Beehivers first said they wanted the court to โ€œdisposeโ€ of the BLM property, then clarified that the state just wanted the court to say it is unconstitutional for the government to hold โ€œunappropriatedโ€ acreage.

Hageman claimed that federal ownership is an occupation equivalent to a casus belli, a situation that justifies war or conflict between nations. โ€œ[T]he standard is whether the federal governmentโ€™s actions would amount to an invasion and conquest of that land ifโ€”assuming a counterfactualโ€”Utah were a separate sovereign nation,โ€ Hagemanโ€™s filing states.

Twenty-six Wyoming lawmakers also saddled up for Utah, urging the court to take up the case and saying their support does not mean they will not seek other federal property for the Equality State. The perturbed posse said its claims could extend to โ€œall former federal territorial lands โ€ฆ now held by the United States โ€ฆ [including] parks, monuments, wilderness, etc.โ€

Six of the sympathetic signatories โ€” Sens. Tim French (R-Powell), Larry Hicks (R-Baggs), Bob Ide (R-Casper), John Kolb (R-Rock Springs), Dan Laursen (R-Powell) and Cheri Steinmetz (R- Lingle) โ€” voted for a draft bill that would allocate $75 million for the Legislature, independent of the executive branch or other state entities, to litigate against the federal government. Senate File 41 โ€œFederal acts-legal actions authorizedโ€ will be considered when the Legislature convenes today.

Gordon was more reserved in Wyomingโ€™s official state plea, alleging โ€œharms that federal ownership โ€ฆ uniquely imposes on western States on a daily basisโ€ as a reason for the Supreme Court to immediately take up the case.

The next coordination meeting for the operation of the Navajo Unit is scheduled forย Tuesday, January 21st 2025, at 1:00 pm

The outflow at the bottom of Navajo Dam in New Mexico. Photo: Brent Gardner-Smith/Aspen Journalism

From email from Reclamation (Susan Novak Behery):

January 13, 2025

This meeting is open to the publicย and will be held as a virtual-only meeting.

CLICK HERE TO JOIN AT THE MEETING TIME

This link should open in any smartphone, tablet, or computer browser, and does not require a Microsoft account.  You will be able to view and hear the presentation as it is presented.   

A copy of the presentation and meeting summary will be distributed to this email list and posted to our website following the meeting. If you are unable to connect to the video meeting, feel free to contact me (information below) following the meeting for any comments or questions.  

The meeting agenda will include a review of operations and hydrology since August, current soil and snowpack conditions, a discussion of hydrologic forecasts and planned operations for remainder of this water year, updates on maintenance activities, drought operations, and the Recovery Program on the San Juan River.    If you have any suggestions for the agenda or have questions about the meeting, please call Susan Behery at 970-385-6560, or email sbehery@usbr.gov.  Visit the Navajo Dam website at https://www.usbr.gov/uc/water/crsp/cs/nvd.html for operational updates.

The next coordination meeting for the operation of the Aspinall Unit is scheduled for Thursday, January 23rd 2025, at 1:00 pm #GunnisonRiver

Crystal Dam, part of the Colorado River Storage Project, Aspinall Unit. Credit Reclamation.

From email from Reclamtion (Erik Knight):

This meeting will be held at the Western Colorado Area Office in Grand Junction, CO. There will also be an option for virtual attendance via Microsoft Teams. A link to the Teams meeting is below. 

The meeting agenda will include updates on current snowpack, forecasts for spring runoff conditions and spring peak operations, the weather outlook, and planned operations for the remainder of the year. 

Handouts of the presentations will be emailed prior to the meeting.

Microsoft Teams Need help?

Join the meeting now

Meeting ID: 277 950 010 81

Passcode: nY7qX7sr

The December 2024 briefing is hot off the presses from Western Water Assessment

Click the link to read the briefing on the Western Water Assessment website:

January 10, 2025 – CO, UT, WY

Despite below average precipitation and warm temperatures during December, snow water equivalent (SWE) is near-normal for about half the region. Below average SWE conditions exist in northern Wyoming, southwestern Colorado and southern Utah, especially in the Escalante and Virgin River Basins where SWE is less than 45% of average. The first seasonal streamflow forecasts suggest near-average runoff in Colorado (90-100%), below average runoff in Utah (80-90%) and much below average runoff in Wyoming (50-80%). Drought conditions were relatively stable during December and cover 39% of the region. Previous forecasts of emerging La Niรฑa conditions did not prove correct; Pacific Ocean temperatures remain near-average (ENSO-neutral) and are expected to remain so through spring. NOAA seasonal forecasts suggest the possibility of above average precipitation in northern Colorado, northern Utah and Wyoming during January and in Wyoming for January-March.

December precipitation in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming was below to much below average except for portions of northern Utah and western Wyoming that saw slightly above average precipitation. Large areas of southern Utah, southern Colorado and central to southeastern Wyoming received less than 50% of December precipitation. In eastern Colorado, many locations received record-low December precipitation. Central Colorado, central Utah and western Wyoming received slightly below average December precipitation.

Regional temperatures were at least 3 degrees above average across all locations. Large areas of Colorado and Utah experienced temperatures that were 6-9 degrees above average. In Wyoming, nearly all locations were 6-9 degrees above average during December and central Wyoming average temperatures were 9-12 degrees above average. Record hot December temperatures were recorded in northern Wyoming.

Snow water equivalent was near-normal (median) for about half of the region on January 1, including most of the Upper Colorado River and Great Basins. Below normal January 1st SWE conditions prevailed in southern Utah, southwestern Colorado and northern Wyoming. The majority of river basins in Colorado and Utah saw a significant decrease in SWE conditions relative to median during December. On a statewide basis, January 1st SWE conditions in Colorado and Utah were near normal (95%) and below normal in Wyoming (83%). Southern Utah is currently experiencing the worst snow drought conditions with the Virgin River Basin at 39% normal and the Escalante River Basin at 43% normal. Six snotel sites in southwestern Utah had no snow on January 1st which set or tied the lowest SWE totals on record. An additional 3 snotel sites in Wyoming had their lowest January 1st SWE conditions on record and an additional 4 sites in Wyoming had the second lowest January 1st SWE value.

The first seasonal streamflow forecasts of the 2025 water year suggest near-average runoff in Colorado river basins and below average runoff in all other regional river basins. In Colorado, seasonal streamflow forecasts suggest between 90-100% of average runoff for all river basins. Runoff in most Utah river basins is forecasted at 80-90% of average except for the Upper Bear (94%), Lower Bear (77%), Escalante (60%) and Virgin (50%). In Wyoming, the seasonal streamflow forecast for the Upper Green, North Platte, Snake and Yellowstone is 70-80% while streamflow forecasts for the Bighorn, Cheyenne, Powder and Tongue River Basins range from 50-60% of average. Except for Blue Mesa Reservoir, below average inflow is forecasted for all other major Upper Colorado River Reservoirs including Lake Powell (81%), Flaming Gorge (69%), McPhee (76%) and Navajo (78%).

Regional drought coverage continued a decreasing trend in December and now covers 39% of the region, compared to 42% of the region in early December. Wyoming remains the epicenter of regional drought with 88% of the state experiencing drought conditions and 26% of the state in extreme drought. The area of extreme drought in the Snake River basin expanded in December. In Colorado, abnormal dry (D0) conditions emerged in the San Juan Mountains and D1 drought conditions were removed near the headwaters of the Arkansas and Colorado Rivers. Drought conditions in Utah were relatively unchanged during December.

West Drought Monitor map January 7, 2025.

Despite previous forecasts indicating the formation of La Niรฑa conditions in the Pacific Ocean, December Pacific Ocean sea-surface temperatures were consistent with ENSO-neutral conditions and there is a 60-80% probability of ENSO-neutral conditions persisting through spring 2025. NOAA monthly forecasts for January suggest an increased probability of above average precipitation for Wyoming, northern Colorado and northern Utah. There is an increased probability of below average precipitation for southern Utah and southwestern Colorado. NOAA forecasts also suggest an increased probability for above average temperatures for the entire region during January. On the three-month timescale, there is an increased probability of above average precipitation for Wyoming and below average precipitation for southern Utah and southern Colorado. The NOAA seasonal forecast for January-March indicates an increased probability of below average temperatures in Wyoming and above average temperatures for southern Utah and southern Colorado.

The New Experimental Winter Forecast is a tool that projects December-March precipitation in the western United States using Pacific and Atlantic Ocean temperatures. The most current forecast uses October – November ocean temperatures and indicates slightly above average winter precipitation for much of the region. The regional pattern of precipitation reflects average Pacific Ocean and warm Atlantic Ocean temperatures. Slightly above average winter precipitation is forecasted for most of the region with the highest precipitation relative to average in southern Utah and the lowest in central Wyoming and eastern Colorado.

December Climate Almanac.ย Much above average to record hot December temperatures in Wyoming are reflected in the temperature extremes. The highest daily maximum, the minimum maximum and minimum temperatures in the region were observed in Wyoming where temperatures are typically colder than Colorado and Utah.

AI has an environmental problem. Hereโ€™s what the world can do about that — United Nations Environment Programme #ActOnClimate

Click the link to read the article on the UN Environment Programme website:

September 21, 2024

There are high hopes that artificial intelligence (AI) can help tackle some of the worldโ€™s biggest environmental emergencies. Among other things, the technology is already being used to map the destructive dredging of sand and chart emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas.  

But when it comes to the environment, there is a negative side to the explosion of AI and its associated infrastructure, according to a growing body of research. The proliferating data centres that house AI servers produce electronic waste. They are large consumers of water, which is becoming scarce in many places. They rely on critical minerals and rare elements, which are often mined unsustainably. And they use massive amounts of electricity, spurring the emission of planet-warming greenhouse gases.  

โ€œThere is still much we donโ€™t know about the environmental impact of AI but some of the data we do have is concerning,โ€ said Golestan (Sally) Radwan, the Chief Digital Officer of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). โ€œWe need to make sure the net effect of AI on the planet is positive before we deploy the technology at scale.โ€  

This week, UNEP released an issue note that explores AIโ€™s environmental footprint and considers how the technology can be rolled out sustainably. It follows a major UNEP report, Navigating New Horizons, which also examined AIโ€™s promise and perils. Hereโ€™s what those publications found. 

First of all, what is AI? 

AI is a catch-all term for a group of technologies that can process information and, at least superficially, mimic human thinking. Rudimentary forms of AI have been around since the 1950s. But the technology has evolved at a breakneck pace in recent years, in part because of advances in computing power and the explosion of data, which is crucial for training AI models. 

Why are people excited about the potential of AI when it comes to the environment? 

The big benefit of AI is that it can detect patterns in data, such as anomalies and similarities, and use historic knowledge to accurately predict future outcomes. That could make AI invaluable for monitoring the environment, and helping governments, businesses and individuals make more planet-friendly choices. It can also enhance efficiencies. UNEP, for example, uses AI to detect when oil and gas installations vent methane, a greenhouse gas that drives climate change.  

Advances like those are fostering hope that AI could help the world tackle at least some aspects of the triple planetary crisis of climate changenature and biodiversity loss, and pollution and waste

So how is AI problematic for the environment? 

Most large-scale AI deployments are housed in data centres, including those operated by cloud service providers. These data centres can take a heavy toll on the planet. The electronics they house rely on a staggering amount of grist: making a 2 kg computer requires 800 kg of raw materials. As well, the microchips that power AI need rare earth elements, which are often mined in environmentally destructive ways, noted Navigating New Horizons.  

The second problem is that data centres produce electronic waste, which often contains hazardous substances, like mercury and lead.  

Third, data centres use water during construction and, once operational, to cool electrical components. Globally, AI-related infrastructure may soon consume six times more water than Denmark, a country of 6 million, according to one estimate. That is a problem when a quarter of humanity already lacks access to clean water and sanitation.  

Finally, to power their complex electronics, data centres that host AI technology need a lot of energy, which in most places still comes from the burning of fossil fuels, producing planet-warming greenhouse gases. A request made through ChatGPT, an AI-based virtual assistant, consumes 10 times the electricity of a Google Search, reported the International Energy Agency. While global data is sparse, the agency estimates that in the tech hub of Ireland, the rise of AI could see data centres account for nearly 35 per cent of the countryโ€™s energy use by 2026.

Driven in part by the explosion of AI, the number of data centres has surged to 8 million from 500,000 in 2012, and experts expect the technologyโ€™s demands on the planet to keep growing. 

Some have said that when it comes to the environment, AI is a wildcard. Why is that?  

We have a decent handle on what the environmental impacts of data centres could be. But itโ€™s impossible to predict how AI-based applications themselves will affect the planet. Some experts worry they may have unintended consequences. For example, the development of AI-powered self-driving cars could cause more people to drive instead of cycling or taking public transit, pushing up greenhouse gas emissions. Then there are what experts call higher-order effects. AI, for example, could be used to generate misinformation about climate change, downplaying the threat in the eyes of the public. 

Is anybody doing anything about the environmental impacts of AI? 

More than 190 countries have adopted a series of non-binding recommendations on the ethical use of AI, which covers the environment. As well, both the European Union and the United States of America have introduced legislation to temper the environmental impact of AI. But policies like those are few and far between, says Radwan. 

โ€œGovernments are racing to develop national AI strategies but rarely do they take the environment and sustainability into account.โ€ฏThe lack of environmental guardrails is no less dangerous than the lack of other AI-related safeguards.โ€ 

How can the world rein in the environmental fallout from AI? 

In the new issue note, UNEP recommends five main things. Firstly, countries can establish standardized procedures for measuring the environmental impact of AI; right now, thereโ€™s a dearth of reliable information on the subject. Secondly, with support from UNEP, governments can develop regulations that require companies to disclose the direct environmental consequences of AI-based products and services. Thirdly, tech companies can make AI algorithms more efficient, reducing their demand for energy, while recycling water and reusing components where feasible. Fourthly, countries can encourage companies to green their data centres, including by using renewable energy and offsetting their carbon emissions. Finally, countries can weave their AI-related policies into their broader environmental regulations.

UNEP is focused on helping the world better navigate the environmental challenges of tomorrow. To do that, we have ramped upย our work on strategic foresight, scanning the horizon for emerging threats to the planet. This process culminated in the development ofย Navigating New Horizons โ€“ A Global Foresight Report on Planetary Health and Human Wellbeing, which was published earlier this year.ย  Produced in collaboration with the International Science Council, it examined eight global shifts accelerating the triple planetary crisis of climate change, nature and biodiversity loss, and pollution and waste.ย 

#Colorado #snowpack approaching normal levels — The #PagosaSprings Sun

Click the link to read the article on the Pagosa Springs Sun website (Garrett Fevinger). Here’s an excerpt:

January 9, 2025

As of Jan. 8, the statewide snowpack pack stood at 95 percent of the 30-year median, according to data from the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) โ€” an improvement from weeks earlier when those levels tracked significant lower.

The San Miguel, Dolores, Animas, and San Juan basins measured to be at 84 percent of its 30-year median snowpack as Individual local levels were slightly lower, with the Upper San Juan area at 73 percent of its median snowpack, the Piedra area at 79 percent, and the Conejos area at 60 percent of its median. As of Jan. 8, 45 inches of snow were measured atop the Wolf Creek summit, which sits at 68 percent of its median snowpack, according to the NRCS.

River flows

The San Juan River was flowing at a rate of 42.9 cubic feet per second (cfs) through Pagosa Springs as of 9 a.m. Wednesday, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Based on 89 years of water records, the median flow for the same date is 54 cfs, with a record high flow of 112 cfs in 1987. The lowest recorded flow for the date is 28 cfs in 1990.

Assessing the U.S. #Climate in 2024 — NOAA #ActOnClimate

Image Courtesy of Jake Fortune, NOAA NCEI

Click the link to read the article on the NOAA website:

January 10, 2025

2024 was the warmest year on record for the contiguous U.S.; Hurricane Helene was the seventh-most-costly Atlantic hurricane on record

Key Points:

  • Theย average annual temperature of the contiguous U.S.ย was 55.5ยฐF, 3.5ยฐF above average and the warmest in the 130-year record.ย 
  • Annual precipitationย for the contiguous U.S. was 31.58 inches, 1.66 inches above average, ranking in the wettest third of the historical record (1895โ€“2024).ย 
  • The Atlantic basin saw 18 named tropical cyclones and five landfalling hurricanes during 2024โ€”an above-average season. Hurricane Helene was the seventh-most-costly Atlantic hurricane on record.
  • The tornado count for 2024 was second highest on record behind 2004 (1,817 tornadoes) with at least 1,735 confirmed tornadoes. When looking at EF-2+ tornadoes, 2024 was the most active year since the historic 2011 season.
  • Hurricane Heleneโ€™s extensive damage topped the list of 27 separateย billion-dollar weather and climate disasterย events identified during 2024โ€”the second-highest annual disaster count in the 45-year record.ย 
  • Drought coverage across the contiguous U.S. ranged from a minimum extent of 12 percent on June 11โ€”the smallest contiguous U.S. footprint since early 2020โ€”to a maximum coverage of 54 percent on October 29.

Other Highlights:

Temperature

For the year,ย temperaturesย were much-above average across nearly the entire contiguous U.S., with record warm temperatures across parts of the Southwest, Deep South and from the Upper Midwest to the central Appalachians and into the Northeast. Seventeen states (Texas, Oklahoma, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, West Virginia, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Maryland, New York, Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine) ranked warmest on record while all but two remaining states across the Lower 48 ranked as one of the warmest five years on record. Theย U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN)ย also indicated that 2024 was theย warmest year on recordย (2005โ€“24).

The Alaska Januaryโ€“December temperature was 28.9ยฐF, 2.9ยฐF above the long-term average, ranking in the warmest third of the 100-year record for the state. Much of the state had temperatures that were above average for the 12-month period with pockets of near average conditions in the southern and eastern mainland as well as the Panhandle.dle.

Precipitation

Precipitationย was above average across portions of the West, central Rockies, Deep South, Upper Midwest, Great Lakes, Southeast and Northeast. Precipitation was below average across much of the Northern Rockies and Plains, parts of the Southwest and portions of the Ohio Valley and Mid-Atlantic region. Louisiana ranked 10th wettest for this 12-month period.

Januaryโ€“December 2024 ranked near the middle of the 100-year record for Alaska, with below-average precipitation observed across parts of the Aleutians, Northwest Gulf, Cook Inlet, Northeast Gulf and much of the Panhandle region. Average- to above-average precipitation occurred throughout much of the rest of the state.

Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters

The Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters update is a quantification of the weather and climate disasters that in 2024 led to more than $1 billion in collective damages for each event. During 2024, the U.S. experienced 27 weather and climate disasters each incurring losses that exceeded $1 billion. 2024 ranked second highest for the number of billion-dollar disasters in a calendar year. These disasters included: 17 severe storms, five tropical cyclones, two winter storms, one flooding event, one drought/heat wave and one wildfire event.

The U.S. cost for these disasters in 2024 was $182.7 billion and was fourth highest on record. The total annual cost may rise by several billion as additional costs from identified events are reported over time. There were at least 568 fatalities associated with these eventsโ€”the eighth-highest number of fatalities on record. The costliest events in 2024 were:

  • Hurricane Helene was the costliest event in 2024. It made landfall as a Category 4 storm in the Big Bend region of Florida on September 26, caused catastrophic flash flooding and power outages impacting millions of people from Florida to North Carolina and resulted in at least 219 fatalities. Helene was the deadliest Atlantic hurricane since Maria (2017) and the deadliest to strike the U.S. mainland since Katrina (2005). The current estimated total cost of this disaster was $78.7 billion.
  • Category 3 Hurricane Milton made landfall near Tampa, Florida on October 9, caused widespread power outages and flooding and spawned tornadoes across the state. The current estimated total cost of this disaster was $34.3 billion.

Over the last 10 years (2015โ€“24), 190 separate billion-dollar disasters have killed at least 6,300 people and cost approximately $1.4 trillion in damage.

This is also a record 14th consecutive year where the U.S. experienced 10 or more billion-dollar disasters and the fifth consecutive year (2020โ€“24) where 18 or more billion-dollar disasters impacted the U.S.

Since records began in 1980, the U.S. has sustained 403 separate weather and climate disasters where overall damages/costs reached or exceeded $1 billion (based on the CPI adjustment to 2024) per event. The total cost of these 403 events exceeds $2.915 trillion.

Tropical Cyclones

Record- to near-record sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic basin helped fuel the active season that formed 18 named tropical systems during 2024. Eleven of these storms were hurricanes (tied with 1995 for fifth highest on record), including five that intensified to major hurricanes (tied with 1995, 1999, 2008 and 2010 for sixth highest), two of which were Category 5 storms. Five of these 11 hurricanes made landfall in the U.S. (tied with 1893, 2004 and 2005 for fourth highest) and include: Hurricanes Beryl, Debby, Francine, Helene and Milton. Hurricane Helene was the seventh-most-costly Atlantic hurricane on record.

Tornadoes

As the Storm Prediction Center continues to confirm the tornadoes that occurred during 2024, the current count is 1,735, which is the second-highest number of confirmed tornadoes on record (2004 had 1,817) and 142 percent of the 30-year (1991โ€“2020) average of 1,225. Four EF-4 tornadoes were confirmed during 2024 and occurred in: Elkhorn, Nebraska (April 26), Marietta, Oklahoma (April 27), Barnsdall, Oklahoma (May 6) and Greenfield, Iowa (May 21).

Wildfires

The number of wildfires in 2024 was approximately 90 percent of the 20-year (2001โ€“20) average with more than 61,000 wildfires reported over the year. The  total number of acres burned from these wildfiresโ€”8.8 million acresโ€”was 26 percent above the 20-year average of nearly seven million acres. The Park Fire, the fourth-largest wildfire in California history, burned nearly 430,000 acres and destroyed over 600 structures.

Alaska saw a below average wildfire year, with approximately 667,000 acres burned during the 2024 fire seasonโ€”about two-thirds of the stateโ€™s seasonal average.

Drought

The year began with approximately 33 percent of the contiguous U.S in drought. Drought coverage shrank as the year progressed and reached the minimum extent for the year at 12 percent on June 11โ€”the smallest contiguous U.S. drought footprint since early 2020. As the summer progressed, hot and dry conditions led to the expansion of drought across the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic as well as across the Plains. By October 29, the extent of drought peaked for the year with more than half of the contiguous U.S. (54 percent) in drought, covering significant portions of the Northwest, Southwest, northern and central Rockies, Plains, Great Lakes, the western and central Gulf Coast states as well as the central Appalachians, Mid-Atlantic and portions of the Northeast.  

Snowfall

The 2023โ€“24 snow season was above average across the southern Cascades, Sierra Nevada, Bitterroots, central and southern Rockies as well as portions of the Adirondack, Green and White mountains in the Northeast. Seasonal snowfall was at least three or more feet below average across parts of the northern Cascades, northern Rockies, the northern Plains as well as much of the Great Lakes and Northeast.

The 2024โ€“25 snowfall season to-date from October 1โ€“December 31, 2024 saw above-average snowfall for locations along the West Coast impacted by early-season atmospheric river events. This includes much of the Cascades, northern Sierra Nevada range, Bitterroots as well as the highest elevations of the central Rockies and adjacent Plains along with locations downwind of the Great Lakes. Snowfall deficits prevailed across the southern Sierra Nevada range and from the northern Rockies to the Upper Midwest and across portions of New England.

Climate Extremes Index

The U.S. Climate Extremes Index (USCEI) for 2024 was more than double the average value, ranking highest in the 115-year record. Extremes in warm maximum and minimum temperatures were both highest on record and the primary contributors to this elevated USCEI value for the nation as well as the regions. In addition, all nine climate regionsโ€™ USCEI values ranked in the top-10 percent of extremes. Annual extremes across the Southeast and South regions were highest and second highest on record, respectively, and can also be attributed to extremes in one-day precipitation. Near-record extremes across the Upper Midwest were also due to elevated extremes in one-day precipitation and ranked third highest. Across the Northeast, wet Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) values and the number of days with precipitation were elevated and across the Northwest, extremes in one-day precipitation and days with precipitation contributed to the much-above average USCEI values for 2024. The USCEI is an index that tracks extremes (falling in the upper or lower 10 percent of the record) in temperature, precipitation, drought and landfalling tropical cyclones across the contiguous U.S.

This annual summary from NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information is part of the suite of climate services NOAA provides to government, business, academia and the public to support informed decision-making. For more detailed climate information, check out our comprehensive Annual 2024 U.S. Climate Report. For additional information on the statistics provided here, visit the Climate at a Glance and National Maps webpages.

Saving the #GreatSaltLake by Rebalancing Its Water Budget — Brian Richter (SustainableWaters.org)

Exposed shoreline of the Great Salt Lake in Utah (USA). The lakeโ€™s level has dropped 14 feet (4.2 meters) over the past three decades, creating an enormous public health threat from windblown dust, placing global seafood production at risk, and disrupting a continental migratory flyway. Photo by Brian Richter

Click the link to read the article on the Sustainable Waters website (Brian Richter):

January 8, 2025

In recent years Iโ€™ve had the great fortune to be able to work with some amazing teams of researchers to explore the causes of water scarcity across many geographies, including the Colorado River, the Rio Grande, the Western US, and around the globe. Importantly, weโ€™ve gone beyond just documenting the problems or threats caused by water shortages and have offered effective, proven solutions for sustainably rebalancing over-drafted water budgets. Our studies have looked at ways of conserving water in irrigated agriculture through crop shifting and other on-farm strategies as well as ways to conserve water in cities and industries.

Our just-published study of the Great Salt Lake in Utah (USA) was one of the most fascinating and enjoyable projects Iโ€™ve been involved with. I learned a great deal from our research!

I came to appreciate the hydrologic hyper-sensitivity of endorheic (lacking outflow) lakes. The Great Salt Lake is the largest saline lake in North America and the eighth largest in the world. Other big ones include the Aral Sea in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan and Lake Urmia in Iran. All of these lakes teeter on a delicate balance between river inflows and evaporative losses from the lakes. The Great Salt Lake began to slip into long-term deficit way back in the mid-1800s when Mormon settlers from the eastern US began to capture the inflowing water from tributary rivers to expand their irrigated farms. The ensuing slow shrinkage of the lake was briefly interrupted by huge snowfalls in the 1980s and 1990s, but climate warming began to accelerate the lakeโ€™s demise since 2000. The lake dropped 14 feet (4.2 meters) and lost two-thirds of its volume during the past three decades.

The primary cause of the lakeโ€™s decline is the diversion of nearly two-thirds of the inflowing water for use in cities, industries, and irrigated farming. Farms are by far the biggest anthropogenic water consumer, accounting for 71% of water consumption, and 80% of this farm water goes to irrigated cattle-feed crops (alfalfa and grass hay). Credit: Brian Richter
Credit: Brian Richter/Sustainable Waters

The outsized contribution of irrigated cattle-feed crops to water shortages is repeated in most other river basins in the western US, and in many other water-scarce regions of our planet. As Iโ€™ve said in previous blogs, farmers and ranchers grow these crops for a simple business reason: our beef and dairy demands create a price for these crops that is quite attractive to farmers. In the past two decades, dairy consumption in the US has risen by 12%, driven mostly by increased demand for yogurt (+220%) and cheese (+28%).

In our paper, we took a close look at a variety of ways to rebalance the Great Salt Lakeโ€™s water budget by reducing production of these cattle-feed crops, along with urban and industrial water conservation. We concluded that saving the Great Salt Lake will require an overall reduction of consumptive water use by 35%; a reduction of 15% is needed to stabilize the lake to keep it from declining further, and another 20% will be needed to replenish the lake to an ecologically safe level.

Saving the Great Salt Lake will come with an eye-popping price tag: it will take at least $100 million per year for a decade to get the lake back to a safe level. However, when you put that cost in perspective, it translates to about $29 per Utah resident per year, or far less than 1% of the stateโ€™s annual budgets.

The challenges of water scarcity are growing rapidly with climate warming in many regions of the globe. Given that nearly 90% of all โ€œblueโ€ water (from rivers, lakes, aquifers) consumed in the world goes to irrigated agriculture, resolving water scarcity and keeping pace with climate change is going to necessarily require not just unprecedented levels of urban water conservation but also a massive transformation of what we grow on farms, and how we grow it. Because these agricultural changes commonly elicit fierce political resistance and high costs, political leaders are loathe to touch it. However, illustrative success stories are emerging around the world, demonstrating that with proper consideration of farmer needs, values, and cultures, and with financial compensation and technical support to ease difficult transitions, we can meet these challenges.

It begins by acknowledging the nature and size of the challenge, and demanding bold leadership from our decision makers. We can only run from water shortages and climate change for so long before truly disastrous consequences befall us.

Sunset from the western shore of Antelope Island State Park, Great Salt Lake, Utah, United States.. Sunset viewed from White Rock Bay, on the western shore of Antelope Island. Carrington Island is visible in the distance. By Ccmdav – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2032320

Can โ€œFloating Poolsโ€ be the template for future management of the #ColoradoRiver? — Jack Schmidt and Eric Kuhn (InkStain.net) #COriver #aridification #CRWUA2024

Attendees of the Colorado River Water Users Association watch negotiators Estevan Lรณpez of New Mexico and Becky Mitchell of Colorado speak on a panel Thursday, December 5, 2024, at the Paris Hotel and Casino. The Upper and Lower basin states are at an impasse about how cuts will be shared and reservoirs operated after 2026. CREDIT: LUKE RUNYON/THE WATER DESK

Click the link to read the article on the InkStain.net website (Jack Schmidt and Eric Kuhn):

January 9, 2024

The press coverage of the December 2024 Colorado River Water Users Association (CRWUA) meeting mostly focused on the ongoing stalemate between representatives of the Upper and Lower Division States over their competing proposals for how the Colorado River Systemsโ€™ big reservoirs will be operated after the 2007 Interim Guidelines terminate in 2026.  The headlines included words such as โ€œturbulentโ€, โ€œbitterโ€, โ€œblusterโ€, and โ€œsparโ€. Indeed, there was tension in the air, and the potential for interstate litigation was a topic of much discussion both on the formal agenda and in the hallways where, traditionally, progress is often made between competing interests.

While the press focus on the tension and divisiveness was unavoidable, I believe that there were good reasons for some guarded optimism.

For the ongoing effort to renegotiate the post-2026 operating guidelines, a consortium of seven environmental NGOs has also made a detailed proposal.  Their proposal is referred to as the โ€œCooperative Conservationโ€ proposal. One of the four action alternatives that Reclamation will analyze, Alternative #3, is patterned after the NGO submittal.  At CRWUA, John Berggren of Western Resource Advocates, who along with Jennifer Pitt and others prepared the proposal, made a presentation on the proposal.  Like the other submitted proposals, the cooperative conservation alternative proposes sophisticated operational rules for Lakes Mead and Powell based on combined system storage and actual hydrology. Where the Cooperative Conservation proposal breaks new ground is the concept of a Conservation Reserve Pool, and this idea could lead the basin toward a practical on-the-ground solution. Indeed, the Gila River Indian Community introduced at CRWUA a similar concept in the form of a Federal Protection Pool made up of stored water in both Lake Powell and Lake Mead. These proposals, taken separately, together, or in some combined and moderated form, might serve as a catalyst for compromise.

As proposed, both the Conservation Reserve Pool and the Federal Protection Pool would be filled with water conserved by reductions in consumptive use and perhaps augmentation from programs in both basins and this water could be stored anywhere in the system. This water would be โ€œoperationally neutralโ€ and thus invisible to the underlying system management operating rules. From an accounting perspective, this Pool would โ€œfloatโ€ above other water in the reservoirs. Floating Pools operate separately from and above the prior appropriation system of water allocation on the Lower River and are invisible to the rules that dictate annual releases from Glen Canyon Dam. Thus, these proposals impart important operational flexibility.  In many ways, Floating Pools split the babyโ€”they incentivize innovative conservation measures that allow participants to find value they would not have been able to realize under the prior appropriation systemโ€”yet they insulate the prior appropriation system and thus are more protective of higher-priority water users than operationally non-neutral ICS.  Itโ€™s a stretch to say there is something here for everyone, but there may be enough to kick-start otherwise stalled conversations.

In their proposal, the Lower Division States have offered to take up to 1.5 maf/year of mainstem shortages. Where the two basins remain deadlocked is what happens in those years when shortages exceed the amount the Lower Division States are willing to accept.  The Lower Division States have proposed that the two basins share the additional required shortages up to a maximum shortage of 3.9 maf/year.  The Upper Division States have said, โ€œNo, because we already suffer large hydrologic shortages in dry years, and we have not used our full compact entitlement; the Lower Division should cover all of the shortages.โ€ In their presentation, however, the Upper Division Commissioners (UCRC members) left the door open for continuing discussions between the two divisions. In his remarks, New Mexico Commissioner Estevan Lopez stated that under what he referred to as โ€œparallel activitiesโ€, the Upper Division States might be willing to discuss conserving โ€œ100,000, maybe 200,000 acre-feet per year.โ€

Water in Floating Pools could be used for a variety of purposes including environmental management, fostering binational programs, and supplementing scheduled water deliveries. During his CRWUA presentation, John Berggren mentioned an obvious use for this pool.  Water stored in the Pool by conserved consumptive use programs in the Upper Division States could be used as an Upper Division contribution during years when mainstem shortages to the Lower Division States exceed a negotiated amount.  Of course, the Lower Basin is unlikely to accept Upper Basin creation of Floating Pools made up of water for which there is no current consumptive use. This water is already โ€œsystem waterโ€ and is now being used by existing Lower Basin water agency. Thus, it would be necessary to develop a program to account for and certify savings in the Upper Basin.  Further, the thorny problem of shepherding (legally protecting the conserved water so that it ends up in system storage) needs to be overcome. For a perspective on this issue, see Heather Sacket. Undeveloped Tribal water is a controversial sticking-point in this regard, with strong feelings and strong arguments on all sides.

If the Upper Division States were to conserve 200,000 acre-feet per year for five years and deposit that saved water in a conservation reserve โ€œFloating Poolโ€, something like 900,000 acre-feet could be available for shortage sharing (after accounting for reservoir evaporation). (We use 900,000 af as an example only, how much water the Upper Division States would have to contribute and maintain in a Floating Pool would have to be negotiated between the two divisions.)  In their presentation, the Lower Division principals pointed out that had their proposal been in place beginning in 2007, there has yet to be a year when shortage sharing would have been required. Note, this conclusion is very sensitive to โ€œinitial conditions.โ€ In 2007, total storage in Lake Mead and Lake Powell was about 8 maf more than it is today. If the 21st century hydrology continues, shortages greater than 1.5 maf/year are likely to occur.

What would the Upper Division States get in return?  During the term of the new post-2026 operating guidelines (which we all assume will also be โ€œinterimโ€), the Upper Division would benefit by the Lower Division agreeing to remove the threat of litigation over a โ€œcompact call.โ€ For a perspective on the potential impacts of a โ€œcallโ€ in Colorado see The Risks and Potential Impacts of a Colorado River Compact Curtailment on Colorado River In-Basin and Transmountain Water Rights Within Colorado.

Carefully crafted with appropriate guardrails, Floating Pool concepts can be a catalyst for compromise between the two divisions that give both parties something they need.

How do Floating Pool alternatives fit with the Schmidt, Kuhn, Fleck management approach?  Based on our conversations with the authors of the cooperative conservation proposal, we believe the two approaches agree โ€” that our management proposal fits on top of and complements their proposal quite well.  In my presentation at CRWUA, I emphasized that, like future hydrology, there is great uncertainty in the future needs of the riverโ€™s ecosystem and societyโ€™s values.  Itโ€™s almost a certainty that in the future, prescribed annual releases from Glen Canyon Dam will cause an unacceptable and unanticipated outcome to some river or reservoir resource. When that happens, our flexible management approach and accounting system keeps the basins โ€œwhole.โ€

Is using the concept of Floating Pools as a catalyst to break the stalemate between the two basins without warts? โ€“ of course not.  There are important considerations regarding the use of undeveloped waterโ€”Tribal or otherwise, and the devil is in the details when it comes to developing appropriate guardrails for annual and total accumulation in such a Pool, the number and type of participants, annual debits, and other important qualifications. Even conserving 100,000 acre-feet per year in the Upper Division States, with acceptable verification, could be a stretch, especially if there is less federal money in the future, as there almost certainly will be.  Finally, it might put off addressing fundamental problems with the law of the river until the new post-2026 operating rules again expire. When they do, the 1922 Compact and 1944 Treaty with Mexico will still be in place, and these agreements collectively allocate 17.5 maf/year of consumptive use on a river that is only producing 13-13.5 maf/year of water at the international boundary (and runoff continues to decline).  What the Floating Pool concept might accomplish is to significantly reduce the temptation and threat of unpredictable interstate litigation, keep the basinโ€™s stakeholders talking to each other, and give us time to move toward more foundational change in how the river is managed.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

Hay is sucking the Great Salt Lake dry: New study finds cattle-feed irrigation is primary culprits in water body’s shrinkage — Jonathan P. Thompson (LandDesk.org) #aridification

Click the link to read the article on the Land Desk website (Jonathan P. Thompson):

January 7, 2025

๐Ÿฅต Aridification Watch ๐Ÿซ

Detail from an 1852 map of the Great Salt Lake by J.W. Gunnison and Charles Preuss.

About 18,000 years ago, Lake Bonneville spread across about 20,000 square miles of what is now northwestern Utah. It was some 1,000 feet deep in places during its maximum extent, was fed by snowmelt and runoff from the mountains, and discharged into the Snake River in Idaho. Over the millennia, climate change shrunk the lake, leaving behind the Great Salt Lake and vast salt flats โ€” shimmering plains of light and ghosts of that ancient water body.

In 1847, upon seeing the remnants of Lake Bonneville, Brigham Young declared it the โ€œright placeโ€ for the nascent Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints to set up its base. Perhaps that was simply because he and his followers were tired of traveling, or maybe he sensed the more-than-passing resemblance to the Dead Sea in the Judeo-Christian holy lands. In any event, the new settlers eventually introduced large-scale agriculture, a rapidly growing population, and industry to the valley โ€” all of which consumed water that would otherwise run into the lake โ€” and eventually the Great Salt Lake began shrinking yet again. In 2022 it reached a record low level, covering just 860 square miles, compared to 2,500 back in the late 1980s.

The Great Salt Lake in 1987 and in 2021. The water dropped so low that Antelope Island ceased being an island. Source: Google Earth.

One culprit is the climate change-exacerbated mega-drought that has dragged on for over two decades. The other is the same infliction that plagues nearly every other Western water body: overconsumption. And a new, detailed accounting of consumption on the lakeโ€™s feeder streams finds that the biggest consumer is agriculture, and the crops responsible for guzzling the most water are cattle feed crops such as alfalfa and grass hay.

Though itโ€™s not surprising, itโ€™s always a bit of a downer to be reminded that my Chunky Monkey, green-chile cheeseburger, and yogurt habits are contributing to the depletion of not just the Colorado River, but also the Great Salt Lake.

Source: โ€œReducing Irrigation of Livestock Feed is Essential to Saving Great Salt Lakeโ€ by Brian Richter, et al.

The new study, โ€œReducing irrigation of livestock feed is essential to saving Great Salt Lake,โ€ by Brian D. Richter, Kat F. Fowler, et al, and published in Environmental Challenges, builds upon other works, including โ€œEmergency measures needed to rescue Great Salt Lake from ongoing collapse,โ€ by Benjamin W. Abbot et al. The titles say it all: The largest saline lake in the Western hemisphere, which nourishes a rich ecosystem, is a major stop along the Pacific Flyway, and supports some 9,000 jobs and $2.5 billion in economic output each year, is in serious trouble.

And rescuing it, the authors say, will โ€œrequire a massive transformation of agricultural production in the basin, particularly in cattle-feed production. Failure to implement the agricultural adjustments needed to arrest the decades-long decline of the lake will lead to serious and escalating threats to regional-scale public health, a continental-scale migratory flyway, and global-scale shocks in seafood production.โ€

The new studyโ€™s findings include:

  • โ€œThe lakeโ€™s shrinkage is attributable toย anthropogenic consumption of 62% of river waterย that would have otherwise reached and replenished the lake.โ€
  • The Great Salt Lake reached its highest level in more than a century in 1987, following a series of extremely wet winters, but has been dropping by about four inches per year on average since then. From 1989 to 2022, the lakeย lost 10.2 million acre-feetย and the surface level dropped 14 feet.
  • Lake shrinkage is bad for human health because itย mobilizes dust containing toxic heavy metals such as arsenic, copper, lead, zinc, cadmium, mercury and other metals, many of them from mining runoff.
  • Great Salt Lake is theย worldโ€™s largest supplier of brine shrimp eggs,ย a key food source for the aquaculture industry. As the lake shrinks, salinity increases, stressing the brine shrimp and lower production.
  • The lake is aย crucial nexus within Pacific Flyway, and the birds eat brine shrimp and brine flies. Wilsonโ€™s Phalaropes and Eared Grebes are threatened by the decline of GSL, and they could be listed under the Endangered Species Act, which could impact industry around the lake.
  • Aggregate water consumption from both anthropogenic and environmental (riparian evapotranspiration and lake evaporation) sourcesย exceeded lake inputs from river inflows and direct precipitationย by 309,664 acre-feet per year on average from 1989-2022.
  • Irrigated farms now cover 791 square miles within the basin, with 70% of the acreage dedicated to growing cattle feed crops. Thereโ€™s also public land grazing leases, which cover more than half of the 21,000-square-mile Great Salt Lake basin and provide additional forage for about 10% of all cattle in the basin.
  • The 2022 U.S. Agricultural Census countedย nearly 1 million cattleย within the basin; about 70% were beef and 30% dairy.
  • Alfalfa farms within GSL basinย produce an average of 3.7 tons per acre, for a total of 951,889 tons per year, or a little over half of all the alfalfa grown in Utah.
  • Alfalfa water use per year is estimated at 617,034 acre-feetย and other hay use 291,695 acre-feet, for a grand total of more than 900,000 acre-feet (or about 57% of all anthropogenic uses in the basin).
  • About 38% of the cattle feed grown in the basin stays in the basin, with about 25% exported to the Snake River basin in Idaho, andย 13% going to California, the nationโ€™s leading milk producer. An estimated 17% is exported internationally, primarily to China and the Middle East.
  • Cattle feed crops in the basinย produced an estimated $162 million in cash receiptsย in 2021, or about .07% of Utahโ€™s GDP. But alfalfa prices jumped about 85% between 2000 and 2021, mainly driven by rising demand from dairy as Americans eat more yogurt and cheese. That makes alfalfa a more lucrative crop for its growers, andย ceasing production would have an outsized local impact.

Currently the lake is suffering from an annual water deficit of about 310,000 acre-feet. But researchers believe the strains of climate change will keep driving the deficit higher, and point to the need to bring the lake back up from its diminished levels. Some are pushing for up to 1 million acre-feet in consumption cuts per year, but Richter and company are suggesting a more politically palatable 650,000 acre-feet per year. Still, thatโ€™s a boatload of water.

So how to get there? Once again the obvious solution โ€” stop growing alfalfa โ€” is also the most contentious, and far more complicated than it appears. The economic impact would be devastating locally, and would also change the communitiesโ€™ cultures. Farmers tend to hold the most senior water rights, meaning they legally can continue to use that whatever however they please. And paying farmers to fallow that much land would not only be prohibitively expensive, but also would create other problems, such as dust and noxious weed proliferation.

The authors present a range of less drastic, but still ambitious โ€” and painful โ€” options, including:

  • They found they couldย reduce crop water consumption by 91,500 acre-feet per yearย by replacing alfalfa with winter wheat. Split-season irrigation, or reducing the number of cuttings from three to one, couldย save another 477,130 acre-feetย (but would reduce alfalfa and hay production by 61%).
  • Combining split-season irrigation and partial fallowing could achieve the 650,000 acre-feet target, but it wouldย cost $76 million per yearย for foregone alfalfa production plus $21 million for reduced grass hay production.
  • If the municipal and industrial and mineral extraction sectors cut consumption by 20%, it couldย reduce the deficit by about 110,000 acre-feet,ย leaving agriculture to pick up the remaining 550,000 acre-feet through the above strategies.
  • Temporary leasing of agricultural water rights wouldย cost as much as $423 millionย annually, but would give farmers more flexibility over what they do with the land (and it would only be temporary).

โ€œUltimately the debate about whether to save the GSL will be about cultural issues, not economics or food security,โ€ the authors conclude. โ€œThe potential solutions outlined here implicate lifestyle changes for as many as 20,000 farmers and ranchers in the basin. In this respect the GSL serves as a microcosm of the socio-cultural changes facing many river basin communities in the increasingly water-scarce wester U.S. and around the globe.โ€

Think like a watershed: Interdisciplinary thinkers look to tackle dust-on-snow

Jonathan P. Thompson

November 5, 2024

๐Ÿฅต Aridification Watch ๐Ÿซ

Read full story

The January 10, 2025 #Colorado Water Supply Report is hot off the presses from the NRCS

Click the link to read the report on the NRCS website. Here’s an excerpt:

#Colorado Water Supply Outlookย – January 10, 2025: Early Accumulation in Southern Basins, Sustained Development in Northern Colorado — NRCS #snowpack

Sheep Mountain. Photo credit: NRCS

Click the link to read the release on the NRCS website:

January snowpack conditions reveal contrasting trends across Colorado, with early season storms boosting accumulation in the southern basins before tapering off, while northern basins were favored through December and received a notable boost from early January storms.


Denver, CO โ€“ January 10th, 2025 โ€“ Statewide snow water equivalent (SWE) is 108 percent of the 1991-2020 median as of January 7th. For context, SWE at this time last year was 76 percent of median, reflecting very different early season conditions. A notable storm during the first week of January 2025 delivered higher amounts of snowfall to northern basins. SNOTEL site Tower recorded impressive gains, with a SWE increase of 6.3 inches. Statewide, streamflow forecasts at the 50 percent exceedance probability are 99 percent of median. Water year to date precipitation as of January 1st is above normal at 104 percent of median and jumped to 108 percent of median on January 7th.  

Early season storms brought snowfall to southern basins, leading to above average accumulation by mid-November. The combined San Miguel-Dolores-Animas-San Juan (SMDASJ) reached 171 percent of median by mid-November before tapering to 87 percent of median following several dry weeks. Despite recent dry weeks, late season monsoonal precipitation improved soil moisture levels, enhancing the basinโ€™s overall runoff efficiency. At the start of the 2025 water year, soil moisture levels in southern basins ranged from 90 percent to 130 percent of median.  The Upper Rio Grande also had a strong early season start and peaked at 203 percent of median snowpack in November and is now at 82 percent of median. The Arkansas basin is currently at 103 percent of median, maintaining above normal snowpack levels through December.  

Between October and early November, statewide precipitation reached 110 percent of median, with southern basins benefitting most from consistent storms. During this period, basins like the SMDASJ and Upper Rio Grande were well above normal at 186 and 168 percent of median, respectively. In contrast, the South Platte and Laramie-North Platte basins received 55 and 65 percent of October median precipitation, respectively. November precipitation continued a varied trend highlighting a boost in eastern basins such as the South Platte at 167 percent of median and the Arkansas at 209 percent of median. Although December conditions remained dry for most basins, with statewide 30-day precipitation at 74 percent of median on January 1st, northern regions received relatively higher precipitation. For this 30-day period on January 1st the South Platte is at 100 percent of median, the Laramie-North Platte at 103 percent and the Yampa-White-Little Snake at 95 percent of median.  

Streamflow forecasts range from 82 percent in the Laramie-North Platte to 107 percent in the Arkansas basin at the 50 percent exceedance probability. While many forecasts remain near or slightly below median, the range of exceedance probabilities illustrates varying levels of uncertainty across basins. โ€œJanuary forecasts also have the widest range of exceedance probabilities, given that there is still much snow accumulation season to come, so as always we encourage you to consider the full suite of exceedance probabilities in addition to the 50%,โ€ noted Karl Wetlaufer, NRCS forecast hydrologist, emphasizing the importance of monitoring future conditions. Another good reminder to consider the full suite of exceedance forecasts rather than focusing solely on median values when interpreting potential outcomes. 

As of January 2025, reservoir storage across Colorado stands at 93 percent of median statewide, a slight decline from the same time last year but not drastically lower. Reservoir levels reflect carryover from last season, with many basins showing relatively stable conditions. The Arkansas and Upper Rio Grande basins, report 114 and 124 percent of median storage, respectively, highlighting increased storage compared to the previous year. Conversely, the Gunnison and SMDASJ basins report below median storage. โ€œReservoir levels at this time of year are more of a baseline rather than a predictor, as they depend on upcoming snowmelt contributions during spring runoff,โ€ notes Nagam Gill, NRCS hydrologist. 

* San Miguel-Dolores-Animas-San Juan River basinย 
* *For more detailed information about January mountain snowpack refer to the ย January 1stย Colorado Water Supply Outlook Report.ย For the most up to date information about Colorado snowpack and water supply related information, refer to theย Colorado Snow Survey website.ย ย 

Interior secretary manages vast lands that all Americans share โˆ’ and can sway the balance between conservation andย development — The Conversation

Visitors trek the Sand to Snow National Monument in Southern California, a popular area for camping, hiking, hunting and other activities. Bob Wick, BLM/Flickr

Emily Wakild, Boise State University

The Department of the Interior was created in 1849 as the United States was rapidly expanding and acquiring territory. It became known as โ€œthe department of everything elseโ€ for its enormous portfolio of missions, which ranged from western expansion to oversight of the District of Columbia jail.

Interior handles natural resources and domestic affairs โ€“ primarily managing 480 million acres (200 million hectares) of federal lands and developing the assets that they hold. Many of these lands are officially open for multiple uses, including energy development, mining, logging, livestock grazing and recreation. Those activities have numerous constituencies, whose interests can clash.

U.S. map showing public lands controlled by the Interior Department and data on their use.
The Interior secretary oversees many types of activities on and beneath lands that represent about 21% of the total surface area of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior

The Interior secretaryโ€™s main job is to promote thoughtful planning that balances resource development and conservation. One strategic role has been expanding energy production, including oil, natural gas, wind and solar power, on federal lands.

Under Republican administrations, the focus often swings toward resource development. Democratic administrations often put greater emphasis on conservation and nonextractive land uses, such as recreation. The secretaryโ€™s actions can play a big role in setting direction for the agency.

Since Interior controls access to valuable natural resources, secretaries also get sued a lot over issues ranging from endangered species protection to water rights.

A motley collection of bureaus

Interior has about 70,000 employees whose missions fall largely into three buckets: managing public lands and wildlife; meeting U.S. trust responsibilities to Native American communities; and regulating energy, water and mining resources on federal lands and in federal waters offshore.

These functions are spread among 11 bureaus whose activities can conflict. For example, there has been heated debate within Interior about how to manage the scenic Bears Ears National Monument in Utah. This site was designated as a monument by President Barack Obama in 2016, drastically reduced by President Donald Trump in 2017, and then restored to its original size by President Joe Biden in 2021. Reflecting these shifts, Interiorโ€™s priorities for Bears Ears have toggled between opening it for mining, co-managing it with area tribes and preserving it for public enjoyment.

Many of Interiorโ€™s offices have changed dramatically over time in response to evolving environmental and cultural values. For example, the Bureau of Land Management was widely known for years as the โ€œBureau of Livestock and Miningโ€ because its decisions closely reflected the interests of those industries.

Even now, ranchers can graze sheep and cattle on public lands at rates generally lower than comparable fees on state or private ranges. And mining companies donโ€™t pay royalties to the Treasury for producing gold, silver, copper and other valuable minerals on federal lands.

However, today the bureau also manages land for conservation โ€“ including a 35 million-acre (14 million-hectare) system of National Conservation Lands. In 2024, the agency adopted a public lands rule that explicitly recognizes the importance of protecting clean water, managing for land health and restoring degraded lands.

Filling up the West

When Congress created the Interior Department, the young United States was in the process of nearly doubling its size after the U.S.-Mexican War. Gold had just been discovered in California, triggering a huge migration west. The scramble to occupy these lands and convert them into stable revenue sources drove Interiorโ€™s early activities.

As the U.S. government removed Native peoples from their ancestral homes and folded largely arid and unsettled lands into the public domain, Interior became a landlord and an agent of development in the West. The federal government gave millions of acres to white settlers in an effort to populate these new territories.

But not all lands met settlersโ€™ needs, especially in dry zones. As a result, much of the arid West remained under federal control. Given this legacy, it is not surprising that most senior officials at Interior have come from western states.

U.S. national parks, monuments, wildlife refuges and other Interior lands have become economic engines for many western towns, attracting private ranches, hotels, restaurants and businesses. In this way, federal lands return tremendous wealth to adjacent communities, particularly with the growth of the outdoor recreation industry.

Nonetheless, many western states resent federal control over broad swaths of territory within their borders and periodically make claims to these lands. Since states donโ€™t have the financial resources to manage roads or fight fires on such large expanses, it is likely that they would sell off large portions of these lands, privatizing them.

For this reason, many conservation groups and outdoor sporting organizations oppose transferring federal lands to the states. Interior secretaries may be called on to mediate these disputes or defend federal interests in court. https://www.youtube.com/embed/iUnV9CLsbO8?wmode=transparent&start=0 The state of Utah is suing the U.S. government for control over 18.5 million acres of federal land โ€“ about one-third of the territory in the state.

Over the past half-century, there has been ongoing debate about whether the royalties and fees the agency charges for federal land use return fair value to taxpayers, or if the agency has been โ€œcapturedโ€ by extractive industries such as mining, ranching, logging, and oil and gas production. The secretary can send important signals about which way an administration tilts.

Indian Affairs and trust responsibilities

Another central Interior role is managing U.S. government relations with American Indian and Alaska native tribes. The departmentโ€™s Bureau of Indian Affairs, created in 1824, works with 574 federally recognized tribes with more than 2 million enrolled members.

Interior manages 55 million acres of land and 57 million acres of subsurface mineral rights in trust for the tribes. This essentially means that Interior agencies earn revenue and disperse funds to tribal members, in part to make up for depriving Native Americans of their rightfully held resources over 150 years of displacement.

Even after federal policy became more supportive of Tribal governance and self-determination in the 1970s, Interior did a poor job of fulfilling its key trust responsibilities. In 2009 the agency settled a US$3.4 billion class-action lawsuit, acknowledging that for decades the federal government had mismanaged tribal resources and failed to pay revenues to Indian landowners for resources produced from their lands.

Well into the 1970s, Interior also was charged with trying to assimilate Native Americans into U.S. society by forcibly removing children from their homes and families and placing them in boarding schools. These institutions punished children for speaking native languages and separated them from their cultural traditions.

Starting in 2021, under Secretary Deb Haaland โ€“ the first Native American to lead the Interior Department โ€“ the agency launched an initiative to document and interpret the experiences of survivors and the intergenerational effects of this policy on Native Americans whose ancestors were sent to the schools. https://www.youtube.com/embed/Ui9jCp1yuws?wmode=transparent&start=0 In a 2022 report, the U.S. government acknowledged for the first time its role in carrying out forced assimilation of Native American children at government-run boarding schools.

This land is your land

Interiorโ€™s reach is vast, but the resources that it controls and the investments it makes in keeping large landscapes connected provide tremendous services. Debate about the merits of public versus private management of these lands is likely to continue.

Growing interest in outdoor recreation and the rise of remote work are putting new pressure on public lands. Finding solutions will require many different land users, as well as state governments and gateway towns, to collaborate. The Interior secretary can play an important role in helping strike those balances.

This story is part of a series of profiles of Cabinet and high-level administration positions.

Emily Wakild, Cecil D. Andrus Endowed Chair for the Environment and Public Lands, Boise State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Local drought could impact the West’s water supply: Western Slope has a vital role in water supply for #ColoradoRiver Basin — The #Telluride Daily Planet #COriver #aridification

West Drought Monitor map January 7, 2025.

Click the link to read the article on the Telluride Daily Planet website (Sophie Stuber). Here’s an excerpt:

January 7, 2025

Although Telluride is in the depths of winter, states are still negotiating a new agreement for the Colorado River basin. About 85% of the Colorado River begins as snow in Colorado and Wyomingโ€™s mountains. The 1,450-mile river provides water to about 40 million people in the U.S. and Mexico and is key to the $5 billion annual agriculture economy. Across the state, snowpack is at 97% of the median. Locally, in the San Miguel-Dolores-Animas-San Juan River Basin, snow water equivalent is at 75% of median.

Map of the Colorado River drainage basin, created using USGS data. By Shannon1 Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0

Coloradoโ€™s Western Slope river basins are essential to the health of the whole basin as well the economy and natural environment. Regional water managers often compete for water demands for agriculture, environmental flows and downstream deliveries to Lake Powell and Lake Mead, which store much of the regionโ€™s water. The current operational guidelines for the Colorado River will expire at the end of 2026. Drought in the Western Slope can significantly impact both local water use and deliveries to Lake Powell, and drought is likely to become more prevalent with climate change…A recent study, published in Nov. 2024, analyzed local drought vulnerability in Western Slope and the consequences for the region, going into the Colorado River basin. โ€œStreamflow declines driven by an optimistic climate change scenario can transition the system to a drier regime and increase drought impacts,โ€ the studyโ€™s authors write. The study developed a model to create streamflow scenarios and the potential impacts of drought in the region. The model showed elevated drought risks to downstream water users, agriculture and the environment…

The San Miguel Watershed Coalition recently released a new planning document for the whole watershed, including floodplain reconnection and beaver-based restoration projects. Much of this work involves federal land managers because more than 50% of the watershed is federally owned…Other important research includes how to better predict how snowpack is transformed into snowmelt and runoff into watersheds, collaborating with Airborne Snow Observatories (ASO), which provides basin-wide measurements of snow water equivalent and forecasts of snowmelt runoff.

The view from an Airborne Snow Observatory plane as it flies over a mountainous region to capture data on the snowpack. Photo credit: Airborne Snow Observatories Inc.

January 2025 update: La Niรฑa is here — NOAA #ENSO

Click the link to read the article on the NOAA website (Emily Becker):

January 9, 2025

La Niรฑa conditions emergedย in the tropical Pacific in December. Thereโ€™s a 59% chance La Niรฑa will persist through Februaryโ€“April, followed by a 60% chance of neutral conditions in Marchโ€“May. Read on for the recent observations that led us to declare the (long-awaited) onset of La Niรฑa and lots of details for current and potential upcoming conditions.

Just the facts, maโ€™am

A quick briefing, if youโ€™re just joining usโ€”La Niรฑa is one phase of the El Niรฑo/Southern Oscillation (ENSO), a pattern of sea surface temperature and atmospheric changes in the tropical Pacific Ocean. La Niรฑaโ€™s signature is cooler-than-average surface water in the east-central Equatorial Pacific, while its counterpart, El Niรฑo, features warmer-than-average surface water. The atmospheric circulation over the tropical Pacific, called the Walker circulation, exhibits characteristic changes during La Niรฑa and El Niรฑo, so we call ENSO a โ€œcoupledโ€ ocean-atmosphere system. ENSO is a seasonal phenomenon, meaning it lasts for several months in a row. The atmospheric changes of ENSO are communicated all around the world, changing temperature and rain/snow patterns in known ways.

Time to get down to brass tacks

Ok! Weโ€™ve been expecting La Niรฑa to show up since last spring. While sheโ€™s dragged her heels, all the pieces came together this past month.

The tropical Pacific sea surface temperature loitered in ENSO-neutral since April 2024, with our primary ENSO monitoring index, the Niรฑo-3.4 index, within 0.5 ยฐC of the long-term average. In December, however, the Niรฑo-3.4 index was -0.6 ยฐC, according to the ERSSTv5, our most reliable long-term sea surface temperature dataset.

2-year history of sea surface temperatures in the Niรฑo-3.4 region of the tropical Pacific for all La Nina events since 1950 (gray lines) and the recent (2024-25) event (purple line). After staying in neutral for most of 2024, the Niรฑo-3.4 index passed the La Niรฑa threshold in December 2024. Graph by Emily Becker based on monthly Niรฑo-3.4 index data from CPC using ERSSTv5.

With the Niรฑo-3.4 Index exceeding the La Niรฑa threshold of -0.5 ยฐC, we can move on to the second box on our flowchartโ€”do we think the Niรฑo-3.4 index is going to stay in La Niรฑa territory for the next several seasons? (โ€œSeasonsโ€ here means any 3-month-average period.) The consensus among our computer climate models is yes. Also, there is a substantial amount of cooler-than-average water under the surface of the tropical Pacific, which will provide a source for the surface over the next few months.  

So, weโ€™re on to the third box, which has actually been checked for a while now (more on that later). The atmosphere has been looking La Niรฑa-ish for months, with stronger-than-average trade winds, more clouds and rain over Indonesia, and drier conditions over the central Pacificโ€”all hallmarks of an amped-up Walker circulation. In December, the Equatorial Southern Oscillation Index (EQSOI), which measures the difference in surface pressure between the western and eastern Pacific, was 1.5 (positive values indicate a stronger Walker circulation). In fact, this is the 5th-strongest December EQSOI in the historical record. Drumrollโ€ฆ La Niรฑa conditions have developed.

This animation shows weekly sea surface temperatures in the Pacific Ocean compared to average from October 14 2024โ€“January 5 2025. Orange and red areas were warmer than average; blue areas were cooler than average. The sea surface temperature in the key ENSO-monitoring region of the tropical Pacific (outlined with black box) was slightly below average for many weeks, but the cooler-than-average region has strengthened lately. NOAA Climate.gov animation, based on Coral Reef Watch Data and maps from NOAA View. View the full-size version in its own browser window.

Break it down for me

There are a lot of different tidbits I want to tell you about this month, so letโ€™s go Q&A-style.

How long will La Niรฑa last?

Thereโ€™s a reason our flowchart says โ€œthe next several seasonsโ€ instead of providing a specific number: we can make predictions, but itโ€™s impossible to know ahead of time exactly how long La Niรฑa conditions will last. To be categorized as a La Niรฑa event in our historical record, the three-month-average Niรฑo-3.4 Index (the Oceanic Niรฑo Index) needs to stay at least 0.5 ยฐC below average for at least five consecutive, overlapping seasons. Current odds are 60% that the Marchโ€“May Oceanic Niรฑo Index will be neutral, which would make this event last fewer than five. Thatโ€™s not to say itโ€™s impossible for this La Niรฑa to last longer, of courseโ€”nature is always full of surprises!  There is a ~40% chance for La Niรฑa to persist into March-May 2025.

How strong will La Niรฑa be?

Itโ€™s very likely this La Niรฑa will be weak, with the Niรฑo-3.4 index unlikely to reach -1.0 ยฐC for a season. This is based on computer model guidance and how late in the year La Niรฑa conditions emerged. ENSO events peak in the northern Hemisphere winter, and thereโ€™s just not a lot of time for La Niรฑa to strengthen.

Can La Niรฑa still affect our winter climate?

Sure can, although a weak La Niรฑa tends to have a weaker influence over temperature and precipitation patterns.

Why was La Niรฑa so slow to develop?

The short answer to this is โ€œwe donโ€™t yet know.โ€ The emergence of La Niรฑa-like atmospheric conditions before substantial tropical Pacific Ocean surface cooling was unusual, though. The global oceans have been running much, much warmer than average for more than a year, which might have had a hand in La Niรฑaโ€™s delay. When we calculate the Niรฑo-3.4 index but account for the temperature of the tropical oceans (the โ€œRelative Niรฑo-3.4 indexโ€) we get an index thatโ€™s been in La Niรฑa territory for months. Only this past year or so has the difference between the traditional and relative Niรฑo-3.4 indexes been so large, and weโ€™re still researching this new measurement and all the implications for ENSO development and impacts in a warmer world.

Has La Niรฑa had any impact on temperature and rain patterns yet?

La Niรฑa affects global climate primarily through atmospheric changes, and since the tropical atmosphere has been looking like La Niรฑa for a while, this is a reasonable question! The global climate is incredibly complicated, and even a big factor like ENSO is only one player. Other climate patternsclimate change trends, and random variability can have a strong influence on overall seasonal patterns. That said, itโ€™s interesting that the Octoberโ€“December 2024 temperature and rain/snow patterns over the U.S. resemble the expected patterns from previous La Niรฑa events. See the Octoberโ€“December La Nina temperature and rain/snow maps, and hereโ€™s the general page if you would like to poke around.

Map showing the difference from average precipitation during Octoberโ€“December 2024. Green areas received more rain and snow than the 1991โ€“2020 average, while brown areas received less. The pattern here resembles what we would expect in Octoberโ€“December during La Niรฑa. Map by climate.gov from CPC data.

Temperature has a strong influence from climate trends, and the Octoberโ€“December 2024 temperature pattern over the U.S. is clearly dominated by more warmth.

Map showing the difference from average temperature during Octoberโ€“December 2024. Orange areas were warmer than the 1991โ€“2020 average. The pattern here resembles what we would expect in Octoberโ€“December from combined climate trends and La Nina. Map by climate.gov from CPC data.

Youโ€™re running out of column inches. Any last tidbits?

Thanks for asking! Speaking of La Niรฑa impacts, you might recall thereโ€™s a link between La Niรฑa and active Atlantic hurricane seasons. In brief, La Niรฑa reduces vertical wind shearโ€”the difference between near-surface winds and upper-level windsโ€”and makes it easier for hurricanes to grow. Interestingly, the Augustโ€“October 2024 wind shear in the Atlantic Main Development Region (an area of the Atlantic where hurricanes tend to develop) was the weakest since 1950 (h/t NOAAโ€™s Matt Rosencrans). We canโ€™t say how much of it was related to La Niรฑa, but given the relative Niรฑo-3.4 index has been in La Niรฑa territory for a while now, itโ€™s an interesting situation that bears more research.

The bottom line

As this unusual La Niรฑa progresses, weโ€™ll be here to keep you updated on all things ENSO!

Here are the typical outcomes from both El Niรฑo and La Niรฑa for the US. Note each El Niรฑo and La Niรฑa can present differently, these are just the average impacts. Graphic credit: NWS Salt Lake City office

#Drought news January 9, 2025: Based on 30 to 60-day SPI along with a lack of early season snowpack, a 1-category degradation was made to southwestern #Colorado, SWE was below-normal across the Four Corners Region

Click on a thumbnail graphic to view a gallery of drought data from the US Drought Monitor website.

Click the link to go to the US Drought Monitor website. Here’s an excerpt:

This Week’s Drought Summary

On January 4 and 5, a low pressure system developed across the Central Great Plains and then tracked eastward to the Mid-Atlantic. Along its track, widespread precipitation (1 to 2 inches, liquid equivalent) was observed throughout eastern Kansas, Missouri, the Ohio and Tennessee Valleys, Central Appalachians, and Mid-Atlantic. Total snowfall amounts were near or more than a foot in portions of these areas. This winter storm also resulted in freezing rain for the Ohio Valley and parts of Virginia and West Virginia. Drought improvements were generally made to portions of the central and eastern U.S. where precipitation amounts exceeded 1 or 1.5 inches, liquid equivalent. Drought coverage and intensity continued its decline for the Upper Ohio Valley and New England. After the winter storm exited the East Coast, an arctic air outbreak overspread the eastern two-thirds of the lower 48 states. A favorable start to the wet season coupled with above-normal snowpack supported a decrease in drought coverage across the Pacific Northwest. Conversely, drought worsened for southern California and the Southwest. Alaska and Puerto Rico remained drought-free, while short-term drought intensified across Hawaii…

High Plains

Based on 30 to 60-day SPI along with a lack of early season snowpack, a 1-category degradation was made to southwestern Colorado. Farther to the north across northwestern Colorado, improving snowpack resulted in a minor reduction in abnormal dryness (D0). Southwestern Nebraska has received little to no precipitation during the past 7 weeks, prompting an expansion of D0. In addition, above-normal temperatures during the late fall and into the early winter exacerbated increasing short-term dryness. Heavy precipitation (more than 1 inch, liquid equivalent) for this time of year resulted in a 1-category improvement to northeastern Kansas. No changes were made to the Dakotas and early January is one of the driest times of the year…

Colorado Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 7, 2025.

West

A dry start to the winter and using 90-day SPI and soil moisture, moderate drought (D1) was expanded across southern California. The NDMC short-term blend, 90-day SPI, and many 28-day average streamflows below the 10th percentile supported the addition of severe drought (D2) to portions of southern California. The Santa Ana winds during early January are likely to exacerbate the worsening drought conditions. Consistent with the NDMC short-term blend along with 30 to 120-day SPI, D2 was expanded for portions of southeastern Arizona and southwestern New Mexico. Based on water year to date (WYTD: October 1, 2024 to January 6, 2025) precipitation averaging above normal and snow water equivalent (SWE) above the 80th percentile, a 1-category improvement was made to southwestern Idaho, eastern to central Oregon, eastern Washington and a small part of northwestern Montana. This 1-category improvement is also supported by NDMC drought blends and SPIs at various time scales. As of January 7, SWE was above-normal (period of record: 1991-2020) across the southern Cascades along with eastern Oregon and southwestern Idaho. SWE was highly variable for the Sierra Nevada Mountains and below-normal across the Four Corners Region…

South

Based on 30 to 120-day SPI, 28-day streamflow, and soil moisture, a 1-category degradation was made to portions of the Edwards Plateau of Texas. SPIs at various time scales and soil moisture supported a 1-category degradation as well for parts of the Rio Grande Valley. Heavy rainfall during late December supported additional improvements across southeastern Texas. Recent rainfall (1 to 2 inches) prompted a 1-category improvement to parts of Mississippi and Tennessee. Despite the recent rainfall, 28-day average streamflow and 90-day SPI support a continuation of D1-D3 intensity for the Tennessee Valley. Although precipitation was lighter this past week, the lack of any support among the indicators for D0 and D1 led to improvements to much of Arkansas…

Looking Ahead

A low pressure system is forecast to develop along the western Gulf Coast by January 10 with a rapid eastward track offshore of the Mid-Atlantic one day later. A large area of 1 to 2.5 inches of rainfall is expected for eastern Texas and the Lower Mississippi Valley, while accumulating snow occurs from the southern Plains east to the Tennessee Valley and Southern Appalachians. High elevation snow is forecast to shift east from the Cascades to the northern Rockies on January 10 and 11. Farther south across California, dry weather is likely to persist through mid-January. On January 13, another Arctic high is forecast to shift south from Canada to the Great Plains.

The Climate Prediction Centerโ€™s 6-10 day outlook (valid January 14-18, 2025) favors below-normal temperatures for a majority of the lower 48 states. The largest below-normal temperature probabilities (exceeding 80 percent) are forecast for the Southeast. An increased chance of above-normal temperatures is limited to the Dakotas and Minnesota. Below-normal precipitation is most likely across the Pacific Northwest, Great Basin, and much of California. Elevated above-normal precipitation probabilities are forecast for the Southwest, Texas, and High Plains, while below-normal precipitation is slightly favored along the East Coast.

US Drought Monitor one week change map ending January 7, 2025.

Just for grins here’s a slideshow of early January US Drought Monitor maps for the past few years.

Cleanup of abandoned uranium mines set to start after Navajo Nation, EPA reach agreement — AZCentral.com

Graphic credit: Environmental Protection Agency

Click the link to read the article on the AZCentral.com website (Arlyssa D. Becenti). Here’s an excerpt:

January 8, 2025

After years of demanding the cleanup of uranium waste at the Kerr-McGee Quivira Mines on the Navajo Nation community advocates got the news this week that the Environmental Protection Agency will remove waste rock from three areas of the site and move it to a new off-site repository. The removal of over 1 million cubic yards of radioactive waste from the sites about 20 miles northeast of Gallup will begin in early 2025, the EPA said. The waste will be taken to a new off-site repository at Red Rocks Landfill east of Thoreau, N.M. The process, including permitting, construction, operation and closure of the repository, is expected to take 6-8 years.

โ€œI feel as though our community finally has something of a win,โ€ said Teracita Keyanna, a member of the executive committee for Red Water Pond Road Community Association. โ€œRemoving the mine waste from our community will protect our health and finally put us back on a positive track to Hรณzhวซ.โ€

Commercial exploration, development, and mining of uranium at Quivira Mines began in the late 1960s by the Kerr-McGee Corporation and later its subsidiary. The mine sites are the former Church Rock 1 (CR-1) mining area; the former Church Rock 1 East (CR-1E) mining area; and the Kerr-McGee Ponds area. The mines were in operation from 1974 to the mid-1980s and had produced about 1.2 million tons of ore, making them among the 10 highest producing mines on the Navajo Nation…From World War II until 1971, the U.S. government was the sole purchaser of uranium ore, driving extensive mining operations primarily in the southwestern United States. These efforts employed many Native Americans and others in mines and mills. Between 1944 and 1986, nearly 30 million tons of uranium ore were extracted from Navajo lands under leases with the Navajo Nation. With over 500 abandoned uranium mines โ€” many say the total could be in the thousands โ€” clean up of mines has always been a battle.