Energy policy — geothermal: The Bureau of Land Management has incorporated public comments for the proposed Chalk Creek lease

A picture named geothermalenergy.jpg

Here’s an in-depth background article about the proposed sale from Joe Stone writing for The Mountain Mail. Click through and read the whole thing. Here’s an excerpt:

The U.S. Bureau of Land Management will address public concerns about the Mount Princeton geothermal lease through a combination of lease stipulations and studies required by the National Environmental Policy Act. In announcing the lease sale, the bureau released an environmental compliance document known as a Determination of NEPA Adequacy which describes issues raised by 278 public comments and how those issues will be addressed.

More geothermal coverage here and here.

2010 Colorado elections: John Salazar profile

A picture named saguachecreek.jpg

From the Colorado Connection (Chris Buckley):

A farmer and rancher from Manassa, Salazar has supported agricultural issues for years. “I used to serve on the Rio Grande Water Conservation District when we fought these big multi-million dollar corporations that were trying to dry up agriculture and move the water to the Front Range,” Salazar said. “It was then I was asked to run for the state legislature, because it was when Governor Owens wanted to run what was called Referendum A. It was a $10 billion bonding authority to build water projects, but nobody talked about where that water was going to come from. We knew for a fact it would be water that would dry up farms and would be moved to the urban areas. I’ve been a strong supporter of protecting agriculture in Colorado and it was shortly after that that my predecessor decide to retire from Congress, so I was asked to run for that seat, and we were just coming off that big referendum win where I led a bipartisan coalition of state legislators across the entire state, and we won that referendum in every single county in the state at the editorial board level, basically.”

One of his biggest accomplishments, he said, is finally helping to secure funding for the Arkansas Valley conduit. It’s a project to provide water to the lower Arkansas valley communities. President Kennedy signed the original authorization back in 1962. “What ended up happening is that was never funded. After 50 years we got that done and I’m very proud of that,” Salazar said.

More 2010 Colorado elections coverage here.

Energy policy — coal: The San Juan Citizen’s Alliance and two other environmental groups plan lawsuit against the Office of Surface Mining over San Juan River mercury levels

A picture named coalfiredpowerplant.jpg

From The Durango Herald (Dale Rodebaugh):

A lawsuit will be supported by a “biological opinion” from the Fish and Wildlife Service regarding the proposed Desert Rock power station, which is now on hold, Eisenfeld said. The study was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request after it was withdrawn by the Bureau of Indian Affairs for which it had been prepared. Navajo Mine, located one mile southwest of Fruitland, N.M., plans to be the source of coal for the Desert Rock plant. The mine is owned by BHP Billiton. In 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency withdrew its air-pollution permit for Desert Rock for failure to follow through on Endangered Species Act requirements. The biological opinion shows that mercury and selenium pollution from regional coal mining is pushing the pikeminnow and razorback sucker to extinction, Eisenfeld said. “We don’t think the Office of Surface Mining is doing its job,” Eisenfeld said…

The biological opinion sheds a poor light on all coal mining and power plant operations in the region, not only BHP Billiton, he said. Mercury, a powerful neurotoxin, impairs reproduction in fish and accumulates in rivers through emissions and runoff, Eisenfeld said. The Fish and Wildlife opinion found that 64 percent of Colorado pikeminnow in the San Juan River exceed the mercury threshold for reproductive impairment, Eisenfeld said. Forty percent of razorback suckers in the San Juan River also meet contamination thresholds…

Taylor McKinnon, with the Center for Biological Diversity, said the Department of the Interior should not rubber-stamp coal development that its own science says is causing fish extinctions. “At stake are two species of fish, millions of people’s drinking water and one of the West’s loveliest rivers.”

Here’s a release from the Center for Biological Diversity (Taylor McKinnon/Anna Frazier/Mike Eisenfeld/Brad Bartlett):

Conservation and citizen groups today filed a 60-day notice of intent to sue the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Office of Surface Mining for failing to conduct Endangered Species Act consultations prior to authorizing the renewal of an operating permit for the Navajo Coal Mine in northwest New Mexico. The agency was required to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to avoid impacts to threatened and endangered species from the mining of coal at Navajo Mine, its combustion at Four Corners Power Plant and coal-combustion waste dumping.

The Center for Biological Diversity, DinĆ© Citizens Against Ruining Our Environment (CARE) and San Juan Citizens Alliance filed today’s notice, represented by the Energy Minerals Law Center.

The groups’ lawsuit will be substantiated by newly obtained government records showing how mercury and selenium pollution from regional coal development is driving endangered fish in the San Juan River toward extinction. A draft Fish and Wildlife ā€œbiological opinionā€ for the proposed Desert Rock Energy Project concludes that mercury and selenium pollution from regional coal combustion, including from Four Corners Power Plant, would be ā€œlikely to jeopardize the continued existence of the Colorado pikeminnow and razorback suckerā€ — two highly endangered fish species in the San Juan River, a tributary to the Colorado.

ā€œThe Department of the Interior cannot simply rubber-stamp the same lethal coal development that its own science says is causing fish extinctions.ā€ said Taylor McKinnon with the Center for Biological Diversity. ā€œAt stake are two species of fish, millions of people’s drinking water, and one of the West’s loveliest rivers.ā€

ā€œThe draft biological opinion for Desert Rock provides solid evidence that San Juan River watershed and the continued viability of native species has been severely impaired in the San Juan River because of coal and other energy development,ā€ said Mike Eisenfeld of SJCA. ā€œRecovery of this river and ecosystem is imperative. Downstream communities rely on San Juan River water, and the agencies must take action to reduce and eliminate the impacts from industrial pollution.ā€

In 2009 the Environmental Protection Agency withdrew its air-pollution permit for the Desert Rock Energy Project, citing the need for completion of Endangered Species Act consultations. The newly released biological opinion was prepared by Fish and Wildlife as part of that consultation, and its ā€œjeopardyā€ determination is believed to have been a fatal blow to the future of the Desert Rock. Like the Four Corners Power Plant, Desert Rock, had it been built, would have burned coal from the Navajo Coal Mine.

ā€œOSM’s decision to renew operations at BHP’s Navajo Mine without consulting with FWS and addressing the findings of the Desert Rock biological opinion violates the Endangered Species Act,ā€ said Brad Bartlett, an attorney with the Energy Minerals Law Center. ā€œWith the ESA consultation demanded by today’s notice letter, BHP’s Navajo Coal Mine will be faced with the same facts that Desert Rock faced in consultation — facts that led FWS to determine that species in San Juan River are in jeopardy because of the toxic legacy being left by the Four Corners’ coal industrial complex.ā€

ā€œOSM’s permitting decision does not evaluate the hydrological impacts of BHP’s nearly half-century of permanent disposal of over a half-billion tons of CCW at the mine and contribution to mercury cycling in the San Juan environment,ā€ said Anna Frazier, executive director of DinĆ© CARE. ā€œWater is life, water is sacred to the Navajo (DinĆ©) people living in the Four Corners area. Our survival has been dependent on the river for irrigation, for fishing, for watering animals, a place of prayer and offering. The legacy of coal development and waste disposal at the mine threatens our health, our plants and animals, and the very existence of the DinĆ©.”[…]

The Four Corners region near the San Juan River is home to two of the largest and dirtiest coal-fired power plants in the United States — the Four Corners Power Plant and the San Juan Generating Station. A third coal-fired power plant originally proposed for the area, the Desert Rock Energy Project, is now on hold. The BHP Navajo Coal Company’s (BNCC) Navajo Coal Mine is located south of Fruitland, New Mexico. It supplies coal to Four Corners Power Plant and is intended to feed Desert Rock Energy Project if it’s constructed. This complex of coal facilities emits CO2, mercury, selenium and other heavy metals into the air and water, which threaten both human health and the survival and recovery of endangered species like the Colorado pikeminnow and razorback sucker.

Mercury accumulates in rivers through emissions, deposition and runoff. Fish are exposed to mercury through diet; mercury in the water column accumulates up the food chain and primarily affects top predators such as the Colorado pikeminnow. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that impairs the reproductive health of fish via portions of the brain that regulate the production and timing of sex steroids; therefore it primarily affects survival of offspring rather than directly killing exposed individuals.

Selenium accumulates in rivers through erosion of selenium-rich soils, coal mining and energy development, and emissions and discharges from coal-fired power plants. Fish are exposed to selenium through a selenium-rich invertebrate diet. As with mercury, adult fish with diets high in selenium do not experience mortality themselves; instead, they deposit excess selenium in the yolks of developing eggs. Newly hatched fry from these eggs use the yolk as an energy and protein source; it is at this stage that developmental anomalies occur. The deformities are either lethal or cause the fry to be more susceptible to predators or other environmental stressors.

Fish and Wildlife’s draft biological opinion shows that 64 percent of Colorado pikeminnow in the San Juan River currently exceed mercury contamination thresholds for reproductive impairment; it predicts that number will rise to 72 percent by 2020 with additional pollution. The document also predicts that selenium pollution from agricultural discharges and ongoing coal combustion would cause 71 percent of those fishes’ offspring to be deformed in a way that harms growth, reproduction or survival. Similarly, the opinion predicts that 85 percent of razorback sucker offspring would be deformed by selenium pollution and notes 40 percent of razorback suckers in the San Juan River already meet contamination thresholds for those deformities.

BHP’s Navajo Mine is located on Navajo Nation lands within Chaco Wash, which is connected with Chaco Culture National Park. Beginning in 1971, BHP began accepting approximately 1.9 million cubic yard (ā€œmcydā€) of coal combustion waste (ā€œCCWā€) from the Four Corners Power Plant annually for use as ā€œminefill.ā€ CCW consists of fly ash, scrubber sludge and bottom ash. According to the EPA, thousands of pounds of mercury are disposed of in the Navajo Mine annually as minefill.

More coal coverage here.

Rio Grande Basin Roundtable meeting recap

A picture named riograndebasin.jpg

From the Valley Courier (Ruth Heide):

ā€œWe are very concerned in the Del Norte area and should be for the whole of the Valley for pollution of our underground water,ā€ Wiescamp said. Wiescamp said a Houston-based firm, Dan A. Hughes, owns mineral rights up San Francisco Creek and may seek permission to drill. Wiescamp said the potential drill site is next to an area drilled in the early 1980’s when an exploratory well was drilled about 4,200 feet. Wiescamp added that Owen Scherzer of Twin Pines Ranch remembered when artesian geothermal water with a temperature of 110 degrees was hit at 4,100-4,200 feet, so it could be possible that exploratory oil and gas drilling could hit underground water sources. ā€œThat tells me we are playing with fire,ā€ Wiescamp said. ā€œThere’s a lot of our water running underneath … We are very concerned about the punching into our source of water with hydraulic ā€˜fracking’ chemicals that they use … We just hope they run into a dry hole…

Colorado Division of Water Resources Division 3 Engineer Craig Cotten said he had also been contacted by several people who were concerned about this, and he had been contacted by the drilling company. ā€œThe Division of Water Resources doesn’t really have any say in these types of wells unless they produce water,ā€ he said. However, he has contacted the oil and gas commission to recommend precautions be taken during any drilling, should it occur.

Rio Grande Roundtable Board Chairman Mike Gibson said representatives from the oil and gas company came to his office as well. He is district manager for the San Luis Valley Water Conservancy District. Gibson suggested the roundtable board set up a sub-committee, and Wiescamp and others volunteered to sit on it.

More IBCC — basin roundtables coverage here.

2010 Colorado elections: Gubernatorial debate recap

A picture named purgatoireriver.jpg

From The Pueblo Chieftain (Patrick Malone):

On water, Tancredo called for a balance between rural and urban interests in the state. He said conservation is a necessity. Maes said more water storage options are needed, and exploring the leasing of water rights that might deter sales that diminish the fabric of rural areas. He favors encouraging that water be kept in the part of the state where it originates.

Hickenlooper took a global view of water in Colorado. “I understand there are a lot of arguments about who owns the water in Colorado,” Hickenlooper said. “There are thousands of lawyers that make a living on it in court. Metaphorically, I think you could say the waters of Colorado belong to all of Colorado. If agriculture is the muscle of Colorado, water is the lifeblood.” He noted that he appoints the Denver water board. “We have been able to cut the consumption of water by 20 percent in the Denver metro area. If you’re selling millions of gallons of water, you have to replace the water in the pump. I say perhaps what makes Denver Denver is that it’s in Colorado, and that we should make sure every drop of water in the Arkansas (River) stays there. “We import so much of our oil, just think about if we start importing our food. We have to make sure that resource is protected. ā€œWe have to make sure that the ones with resources don’t buy off the weakest in the herd. I think by collaborating, we can solve this.ā€

More 2010 Colorado elections coverage here.