Aspinall Unit update

A picture named aspinallunitdescription.jpg

From email from Reclamation (Dan Crabtree):

Reclamation will be reducing releases from Crystal Reservoir during the coming weeks in response to the dry fall conditions and to provide low river elevations for the Brown Trout spawn. The target base flow for the Black Canyon will be 400 cfs this winter due to the current dry conditions. On Saturday October 16th at 4:00 p.m., releases from Crystal dam will be reduced by 100 cfs resulting in a flow in the Black Canyon and Gunnison Gorge of about 500 cfs. During the coming weeks, as the Uncompahgre Valley Water Users reduce diversions through the Gunnison Tunnel, there will probably be some minor flow fluctuations in the river. Flows in the Gunnison Gorge and Black Canyon will settle in the 400 cfs range sometime during the last two weeks of October.

More Aspinall Unit coverage here.

Fryingpan-Arkansas Project update

A picture named fryingpan.jpg

From email from Reclamation (Kara Lamb):

It is the time of year where we start making adjustments to Ruedi Dam for our fall and winter release schedule. As a result, we will curtail releases from Ruedi to the Fryingpan tomorrow, October 15, by about 35 cfs. This will put around 75 cfs in the ‘Pan at the Ruedi Dam gage.

Inflow to the reservoir has been dropping over the course of this week. It is currently around 45 cfs. The reservoir water elevation is at 7738 feet.

More Fryingpan-Arkansas Project coverage here.

Energy policy — oil shale: Three research projects are moving on to an NEPA review

A picture named shelloilshaleprocess3

Update: Here’s a release about the oil shale NEPA review from Governor Ritter’s office (Evan Dreyer):

GOV. RITTER STATEMENT ON BLM STEPS TOWARD OIL SHALE RD&D LEASING

Gov. Bill Ritter issued the following statement today regarding the U.S. Bureau of Land Management’s steps toward additional oil shale research activities:

ā€œBLM Director Bob Abbey’s announcement that it will continue to analyze three oil shale research proposals follows Interior Secretary Salazar’s important reforms in Research, Development & Demonstration leasing. The RD&D program that this Administration is implementing has elements that I have long supported, including constraints on the size of leases and substantial due diligence and reporting requirements.

ā€œColorado has always supported a robust RD&D process to research and evaluate the technologies that could be used to develop oil shale and to better understand the environmental impacts.

ā€œThe potential for oil shale development in Colorado, and the economic opportunity that it represents, is huge. But the prospect of commercial-scale activities raises significant questions about how oil shale can be successfully integrated into our state’s economy and how we can protect the state’s environment, water, wildlife and communities.

ā€œThe RD&D program is wisely designed to answer fundamental questions about the feasibility of the technologies, their likely impacts on the environment and communities of Western Colorado, and their use of our scarce and valuable water supplies. As I have always maintained, these questions must be answered before oil shale research can transition to commercial development.

ā€œI’m therefore pleased that Director Abbey is taking such a thoughtful approach.ā€

Here’s the release from the Bureau of Land Management (Matt Spangler/Vince Vogt):

The Bureau of Land Management today announced that it has taken a key step to advance research on an important potential source of domestic energy.

The BLM’s Washington, D.C., Office has completed its review of three nominations for oil shale Research, Development, and Demonstration (RD&D) leases in Colorado and Utah. These second-round leases would allow the proponents to test the feasibility of various oil shale recovery technologies on public lands in the two states. The nominations will now be forwarded to the agency’s Colorado and Utah State Offices for the next phase in the review process.

BLM Director Bob Abbey said, “To determine whether oil shale will be a viable energy source on a commercial scale, we need to support critical research to answer fundamental questions about the feasibility of the technologies, their impacts on the environment and local communities, and their use of water. This second round of leases will help us answer those critical questions so that we can chart a safe, orderly, and responsible path for our energy future.”

Abbey added, “The BLM is committed to careful consultation with all affected stakeholders in the oil shale process, including states, counties and tribes. The analysis that our states will now conduct will help us chart a wise path for western shale oil resources.”

In November 2009, the BLM published a notice in the Federal Register calling for nominations for a potential second round of oil shale RD&D leases, following the awarding of six leases in an initial round in 2007.

The BLM solicited nominations of parcels, not to exceed 160 acres, for the conduct of oil shale research, development, and demonstration under a 10-year lease term. Applicants could also identify up to an additional 480 acres to be reserved for a potential commercial lease, for a total of 640 acres. The lease size available for commercial development was reduced from the 5,120 acres in the first round of leasing because the substantial reserves represented by 640 acres are more than adequate for a major oil shale production operation. The second- round leases would contain substantial diligence requirements, including specific timeframes for submitting plans of development, obtaining state and local permits, developing infrastructure, and submitting quarterly reports.

The BLM received three nominations in early 2010: two in Colorado, from ExxonMobil Exploration, Co., and Natural Soda Holdings, Inc.; and one in Utah, from AuraSource, Inc.

Earlier this year, the BLM formed an Interdisciplinary Review Team (IDRT) with representatives of the Governors of Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming; the Department of Energy; and the Colorado School of Mines. The team recommended that all three nominations be advanced.

The Colorado and Utah offices will now conduct National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews of the nominations. The analyses may take from four to 18 months to complete, depending upon the complexity of the resource issues to be analyzed.

Oil shale is a fine-grained sedimentary rock containing organic matter from which shale oil may be produced. The organic matter, derived mainly from aquatic organisms, is called kerogen.

According to the United States Geological Survey, the U.S. holds more than half of the world’s oil shale resources. More than 70 percent of the U.S. supply lies on Federal lands in Colorado, Utah, and Wyoming.

From the Deseret News (Amy Joi O’Donoghue):

Colorado and Utah offices of the BLM will now complete a federally mandated environmental review. That could take up to 14 months. One lease is held by AuraSource in Utah, while the other two are in Colorado with Exxon?Mobil Exploration Co., and Natural Soda Holdings Inc.

AuraSource Chief Financial Officer Eric Stoppenhagen said the two-year-old company uses a low-temperature catalytic process to recover oil from oil shale, relying on less than one barrel of water per barrel of shale oil that is produced. Water consumption is driven more by mining and road dust control, as well as reclamation efforts. In China, AuraSource’s plant in Qinzhou has the processing capacity of 1 million tons of oil shale.

BLM’s director Bob Abbey said the projects will serve as a good blueprint to answer fundamental questions about the technology of oil shale extraction. “To determine whether oil shale will be a viable energy source on a commercial scale, we need to support critical research to answer fundamental questions about the feasibility of the technologies, their impacts on the environment and local communities, and their use of water,” Abbey said. “This second round of leases will help us answer those critical questions so that we can chart a safe, orderly and responsible path for our energy future.”[…]

Environmental groups, however, blasted the announcement. “Oil shale is nothing more than a dirty, expensive pipe dream,” said Bobby McEnaney, lands advocate for the Natural Resources Defense Council. “This administration is making smart decisions by investing in clean energy that will create jobs and reduce our dependence on oil. Oil shale undermines that effort,” McEnaney said.

More coverage from the Colorado Independent (David O. Williams):

BLM director Bob Abbey today announced the federal agency has reviewed nominations for three potential lease-holders — ExxonMobil and Natural Soda in Colorado and AuraSource in Utah – and will now forward them on to state regulatory agencies for the next phase of consideration. ā€œThe potential for oil shale development in Colorado, and the economic opportunity that it represents, is huge,ā€ [Governor Ritter] said in a release. ā€œBut the prospect of commercial-scale activities raises significant questions about how oil shale can be successfully integrated into our state’s economy and how we can protect the state’s environment, water, wildlife and communities.ā€

ā€œPeople have been trying to figure out how to suck the hydrocarbons out of these rocks for over a century,ā€ former oil shale worker Craig Thompson said in a release. Thompson is now a professor of engineering at Western Wyoming Community College and on the board of the National Wildlife Federation. ā€œNo one has found an economic solution. When Exxon pulled the plug on their $5 billion gamble and laid off 2,200 workers, the West learned a bitter lesson. The last thing we need is another pipe dream and another economic ā€˜bust.ā€™ā€

More coverage from the Denver Business Journal (Cathy Proctor):

The leases — the second round of federal oil shale leases offered in recent years — underwent review at federal agency’s headquarters in Washington and now will undergo additional review by BLM personnel in Colorado and Utah, the agency said. The department-level review team included representatives of the governors of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming, the U.S. Department of Energy and the Colorado School of Mines. The team recommended that all three nominations be moved to state-level reviews. The BLM’s Colorado and Utah offices will now conduct National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews of the proposals, a process that could take four to 18 months to complete, according to the BLM.

More oil shale coverage here.

Animas-La Plata Project: Planner to host a series of public meetings to help chart the course of recreation at Lake Nighthorse

A picture named lakenighthorserisingwaters052010

From The Durango Herald (Dale Rodebaugh):

“People are afraid they’re going to get run over,” [Planner Joy Lujan] said. “They fear they aren’t going to be heard.” She wants to dispel these fears by engaging the public in a series of open meetings starting early next month and ending early next year.

Meetings will include:

•One or two open houses with self-explanatory information stations and project participants to answer questions.

•Forums at which members of the public can express opinions. Keypad polling will determine support for different positions.

•Structured workshops to reach tentative agreements on issues such as boating. Motorized versus nonmotorized craft is one contentious topic.

•Design workshops that bring preferred recreation options into the plan.

•A session to review the overall recreation blueprint before it is adopted…

The Animas-La Plata Water Conservancy District took on the job of providing recreation at the lake 18 months ago after Colorado State Parks said it was broke. They caught a break when the National Park Service offered free for two years the services of Lujan to lead the public-participation aspect of a recreation plan. DHM Design of Durango is the consultant on technical and financial matters.

More Animas River watershed coverage here and here.

2010 Colorado elections: The Pueblo Chieftain editorial board endorses John Hickenlooper over Dan Maes and Tom Tancredo

A picture named huerfanoriver1

From The Pueblo Chieftain:

As mayor, and as a former private entrepreneur, he has been able to shrink the size of Denver’s government. He promises to do likewise as governor…

During a Chieftain-sponsored forum in Pueblo this week, Mr. Hickenlooper stated that ā€œwe should make sure every drop of water in the Arkansas (River) stays there. We import so much of our oil, just think about if we start importing our food. We have to make sure that resource is protected.ā€

More 2010 Colorado elections coverage here.

Blue Mesa Reservoir storage pool to protect against a Colorado River Compact call?

A picture named coloradoriverbasin.jpg

The Arkansas and Gunnison Basin roundtables are hoping to push along a storage pool of 200,000 acre-feet of water to protect transmountain diversions junior to the Colorado River Compact. Here’s a report from Chris Woodka writing for The Pueblo Chieftain. From the article:

The roundtable is developing the plan in conjunction with the Gunnison Basin Roundtable. It would release water from storage in Blue Mesa to prevent curtailment of diversions if downstream states in the Colorado River Compact issue a call on the river…

The plan of the Arkansas and Gunnison roundtables would be to store up to 200,000 acre-feet of water to release during dry times in order to allow transmountain diversions to continue. ā€œOur motivation is that almost all of our transmountain rights are junior to the conditional rights of energy companies on the Western Slope,ā€ said Gary Barber, chairman of the roundtable. ā€œFor the Gunnison folks, it would shift management to within the state of Colorado.ā€

The process of getting the Bureau of Reclamation to agree to a storage contract that would renew annually is complicated and the roundtables want to send a team to Washington to explore the possibility, rather than a letter which was proposed at the last meeting…

The group voted to send [Jim Broderick, vice chairman of the Arkansas Basin Roundtable], who has worked with top Reclamation officials through his position as executive director of the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District, to Washington. Under the joint proposal, the Gunnison roundtable would send a representative, and top state water officials would also attend. ā€œWe want to see if the water in Blue Mesa could be put to use for the whole state,ā€ Broderick said…

The plan would not allow water from the Gunnison River to be pumped over the Continental Divide, which is still fiercely opposed by water interests in the Gunnison basin, said Jeris Danielson, a water consultant and former state engineer. The storage account proposed in the agreement would provide protection for absolute water rights — water that has been put to a beneficial use rather than simply claimed — prior to Sept. 10, 2010, explained Alan Hamel, executive director of the Pueblo Board of Water Works. It would allow for protection of existing water rights or against depletions in the Arkansas, South Platte and Colorado basins, but would not preclude development of future transmountain projects, he said. ā€œThe idea would be to develop a pool of water to be used against a call from the downstream states,ā€ Hamel said. ā€œOther entitlements within the state could still be developed.ā€

Colorado’s Front Range imports nearly 500,000 acre-feet (160 billion gallons) annually from the Western Slope. The Arkansas Valley imports about 130,000 acre-feet (42 billion gallons) annually, through the Twin Lakes, Boustead, Homestake and Carlton tunnels, as well as several ditches.

More IBCC — basin roundtables coverage here.