First snows in #Colorado — @Russ_Schumacher (@ColoradoClimate Center) #snowpack

Click the link to read the article on the Colorado Climate Center blog (Russ Schumacher):

October 18, 2024

Our last blog post took a look at the timing of first freezes in Colorado. October has been extremely warm thus far, and many parts of the state are still awaiting their first freeze of the fall (though some of those locations may get one this weekend with the cold air moving in.) In this post, we’ll look at the data for another sign of autumn in Colorado: the first snowfall.

Colorado Public Radio’s Joe Wertz published a nice summary of when the average first snow happens in Colorado. When he asked me about this data, it turned out to be surprisingly difficult to find! The average date of first snow is not a part of the official NOAA “normals” dataset, so I had to do some calculations myself. The CPR story has an interactive map, and we now have one on our website here. I encourage you to read the story, and we’ll add a little more detail here.

Map showing the median date of the first snowfall of the season. See an interactive version (where you can mouse over each individual station) at https://climate.colostate.edu/normals_stn_select_snow.html

As with first freezes, the timing of the first snow varies a lot across Colorado, and it is largely tied to elevation. Among long-term climate stations, the median earliest (i.e., half of years would be earlier and half of years later) first snow is at Climax in Lake County, at over 11000 feet in elevation, on September 20. (If we had observing stations on the highest mountain peaks in Colorado, the idea of “first snow” would not be helpful, as they can get snow at any time of year.) At the other extreme are low-elevation stations in western and southeastern Colorado, where the first snow doesn’t fall until sometime in November in most years. Gateway in Mesa County, one of the warmest locations in the state, takes the prize for latest average first snow: November 25. The rest of the state falls somewhere in between. For the Front Range urban corridor, mid-to-late October is the most typical time for the first snow, while areas in the foothills and mountains are generally in late September or early October. Some mountain locations got their first snow of this fall in the September 22-23 storm: if they did, that was a little earlier than usual. And the rest will likely get their first in the current storm, which is a little later than usual.

Of course, the averages are just averages, and in Colorado we know that variations can be huge. As one example, in Fort Collins, the most common timing for the first snow is in late October, but it has happened as early as September 8, which just happened in 2020, and as late as December 13, in 1965.

Is the snow season changing?

Next, we’ll take a look at the stations that have consistently reported snowfall since at least 1980, and see whether the timing of the first and last snowfall has been changing. Along the Front Range and the southeastern Plains, the timing of the first snow has been creeping later in recent decades, by a week or two at most stations. But the last snow in the spring has also been trending later. So the length of the snow season is somewhat shorter in these areas, but overall it is mainly starting a little later and ending a little later.

Map showing the change over the period 1980-2024 in the median date of first snow in the fall. Trends toward longer snow seasons (earlier in the fall, later in the spring) are shown in blue; toward shorter snow seasons in red.
Map showing the last snow in the spring. Trends toward longer snow seasons (earlier in the fall, later in the spring) are shown in blue; toward shorter snow seasons in red.

Mountain locations don’t show much change in timing, and there are a few mountain stations where the first snow has trended earlier over this time period. What caught my eye on these maps was far northeast Colorado: the stations at Holyoke and south of Sedgwick. (These stations have excellent records with very diligent volunteer observers.) The average first snow has shifted about a week earlier, and the last snow about 2-3 weeks later, meaning that the snow season is around a month longer now than it was a few decades ago. Cochetopa Creek, south of Gunnison, and Crestone in Saguache County, have similar trends toward longer snow seasons.

What does this all mean?

These trends in the timing of the first snow in eastern Colorado do generally line up with recent trends in temperature in Colorado, where the falls have gotten a lot warmer, but the springs haven’t warmed nearly as much.  Because it needs to be relatively cold to snow, it makes sense that the odds have been tilted away from early-fall snow, but still allow snow to regularly happen in April and May. But it’s also important to take these changes with a grain of salt: as I told CPR, snow is very challenging to measure accurately, and measurement protocols have been inconsistent over time, so some of the changes may be as much a function of measurement differences than of real changes in the climate.

And lastly, is there a connection between whether the first snow is early or late, and the total amount of snow that falls over the season as a whole? Again, it depends where you are. In places that average a lot of snow every year (i.e., the mountains), there’s no correlation between the timing of the first snow and the seasonal total. Starting the accumulation season a week or two early or late comes out in the wash when you get hundreds of inches of snow each year. But the relationship is stronger than I might have expected in the less-snowy parts of the state.

Correlation between the date of the first snow in the fall and the total snowfall over the entire season. Blue shading indicates that a later first snow is correlated to less total snowfall for the season.

At most lower-elevation stations, there is a modest negative correlation between the date of the first snow and the total snowfall for the season (shown in blue on the map), meaning that a later start tends to mean less snow overall. On the northern Front Range, these correlations are pretty weak, but at some southeastern Colorado stations, the correlation is surprisingly strong. For example, here is the graph for Rocky Ford:

Comparison of the date of the first snowfall (horizontal axis) to the season total snowfall (vertical axis, in inches), at the Rocky Ford 2SE station. The median first snowfall date (November 16) and the average seasonal total (24.6″) are shown with dashed lines. The regression line for these two quantities is shown in the thick blue line, and the correlation coefficient is -0.44. This indicates that years with a later first snow have some tendency to also have less total snowfall.

The average first snow at Rocky Ford is in mid-November, and the average total is about 25”. An early first snow doesn’t guarantee a large seasonal total: some very dry winters had an early start. But interestingly, there’s never been a big snow year at Rocky Ford if there’s no snowfall until late November (or later). This may be a bit of a “chicken-or-egg” argument: is the total lower because the snow season was shorter, or was the season shorter because the weather patterns didn’t favor snow in the fall? Either way, there is at least some connection at these lower-elevation locations.

To summarize, if you’re concerned about this year’s snowpack in the mountains, there’s no reason to be worried by the fact that there hasn’t been much snow yet – there is a very long accumulation still ahead. But if you like to see lots of snow at your lower-elevation location, the chances of a big snowfall year do start to decline when the first flakes don’t fly until late in the fall.

First salmon since 1912 spotted in #Oregon’s Klamath Basin months after dam removal — Oregon Department of Wildlife

Fall-run Chinook Salmon, Oct. 16, 2024, photo by Mark Hereford, ODFW.

Click the link to read the release on the Oregon Department of Wildlife website (Mark Hereford and Benji Ramirez):

Oct. 17, 2024

KLAMATH FALLS, Ore. – On October 16, a fall-run Chinook salmon was identified by ODFW’s fish biologists in a tributary to the Klamath River above the former J.C. Boyle Dam, becoming the first anadromous fish to return to the Klamath Basin in Oregon since 1912 when the first of four hydroelectric dams was constructed, blocking migration.

The salmon and others likely traveled about 230 miles from the Pacific ocean to reach the tributary only months after four Klamath River dams were removed to ensure fish passage from California to Oregon.

“This is an exciting and historic development in the Klamath Basin that demonstrates the resiliency of salmon and steelhead,” said ODFW Director Debbie Colbert. “It also inspires us to continue restoration work in the upper basin. I want to thank everyone that has contributed to this effort over the last two decades.”

A closer look at same fall-run Chinook Salmon seen on Oct. 16, 2024, in a tributary of the Klamath River after removal of the dams marking the first fish to return since 1916. Photo by Jacob Peterson, ODFW.

“The return of our relatives the c’iyaal’s is overwhelming for our tribe. This is what our members worked for and believed in for so many decades,” said Roberta Frost, Klamath Tribes Secretary. “I want to honor that work and thank them for their persistence in the face of what felt like an unmovable obstacle. The salmon are just like our tribal people, and they know where home is and returned as soon as they were able,” added Frost.

“c’iyaal’s are culture carriers,” said Natalie Ball, Klamath Tribes Council Woman. “I’m excited for their return home and for us to be in relation with them again.”

Fish biologists have been surveying the Klamath River and tributaries since dam removal as part of the agency’s responsibility to monitor the repopulation of anadromous fish species to the basin in collaboration with The Klamath Tribes.

Mark Hereford, ODFW’s Klamath Fisheries Reintroduction Project Leader, was part of the survey team that identified the fall-run Chinook. His team was ecstatic when they saw the first salmon.

“We saw a large fish the day before rise to surface in the Klamath River, but we only saw a dorsal fin,” said Hereford. “I thought, was that a salmon or maybe it was a very large rainbow trout?” Once the team returned on Oct. 16 and 17, they were able to confirm that salmon were in the tributary.

ODFW, The Klamath Tribes and other partners have been working together on this historic restoration project to monitor Chinook salmon, coho salmon, steelhead, and Pacific lamprey once they are able to repopulate habitat above the dams.

Photos and video by ODFW:
A fall-run Chinook Salmon seen on Oct. 16, 2024, in a tributary of the Klamath River after removal of the dams marking the first fish to return since 1916. Photo by Mark Hereford, ODFW.
https://dfw.state.or.us/news/images/2024/Oct_16_2024_Fall-run_Chinook_Salmon_Klamath_River_Oregon_01_ODFW_photo.jpg

A closer look at same fall-run Chinook Salmon seen on Oct. 16, 2024, in a tributary of the Klamath River after removal of the dams marking the first fish to return since 1916. Photo by Jacob Peterson, ODFW.
https://dfw.state.or.us/news/images/2024/Oct_16_2024_Fall-run_Chinook_Salmon_Klamath_River_Oregon_02_ODFW_photo.jpg

Fall-run Chinook Salmon, Oct. 16, 2024, photo by Mark Hereford, ODFW.
https://dfw.state.or.us/news/images/2024/Fall-run_Chinook_salmon_in_tributary_of_Klamath_River_Oregon_first_salmon_survey_post_dam_removal_Oct_16_2024_ODFW_photo_4.jpg

Underwater video of a fall-run Chinook Salmon on Oct. 16, 2024, in a tributary of the Klamath River after removal of the dams: https://youtu.be/uqHou-eHwDg

fall-run Chinook Salmon seen on Oct. 16, 2024, in a tributary of the Klamath River after removal of the dams marking the first fish to return since 1916. Photo by Mark Hereford, ODFW.